1,484 words
Wajahat Ali
White survival depends on having a clearly defined white identity. Great damage has occurred from the intentional blurring of the boundaries between the races. Too often, otherwise reasonable whites have been lulled to think there are no such boundaries. They commit fuzzy thinking such as “not all of them are like that,” “we all want the same things,” “diversity is our strength,” “the colorblind meritocratic society is the fairest,” and so on. They believe that if we all mix together we will eliminate the animosity between peoples. White advocates can counter such fallacies with all manner of arguments and statistical, scientific and historical facts, all of them adhering to high standards of empirical truth and logic, and still make slow headway in the attempts to demonstrate the differences between peoples and to restore our common identity.
People need to know not only which side they are on, but that different sides even exist. Otherwise, the task of waking white people up to the existential threat they face is much more difficult. The entire mainstream culture, along with the extreme left, has devoted considerable energy to making sure awareness of the differences that separate us does not emerge—at least among the white population (for non-whites, the divisions between whites and all others a continually stoked.)
Part of this intentional blurring has misled people about the real reasons people come to the United States. Many whites are mentally stuck in the distant past, thinking that new immigrants overwhelmingly wish to become Americans, to adopt our ways and assimilate. That belief is pretty much a joke today; people do not emulate those who are so obviously self-destructive. Often, the reasons people flood into the West today are purely economic; they rightfully see us as easy pickings since our government seems to favor them instead of the original founding stock and look the other way when they break laws.
If economic exploitation were the only reason they come, that alone would be cause enough to dam the flood of foreigners. But there is an even darker side to the current wave of migration. Many other immigrants, or their American-born offspring, are blatantly anti-American; they are fueled by a deep sense of Nietzschean ressentiment, with generations of feelings of rage and inferiority repressed by impotence. Now that whites are undergoing civilizational weakness and confusion, they see their opportunities for conquest and retribution.
Most Americans seem unaware of such attitudes, even though, every once in a while, somebody lets it slip that they have come here with bad intent. Central Americans publicly express their desire for a “Reconquista” of North America, but such comments do not make it into the mainstream. Occasionally a Muslim makes a declaration of jihad, but they are dismissed as being part of the fringe.
But the truth has a funny way of emerging into the spotlight despite the desires of the ruling classes. It may have passed out of the 24-hour-news-cycle, but it’s worth remembering what happend on Thanksgiving this year: a prominent Pakistani Muslim said the naughty parts out loud on X, and it didn’t just make the rounds of right-wing media and die there; it become viral and even some major news outlets picked it up. Wajahat Ali, a New York Times columnist, directed his comments directly to whites:
You are losers. You have lost. Your story is a shitty story filled with misery. It’s filled with bland chicken. It’s filled with terrible, terrible dry ass meat. Your music sucks. All your culture sucks. That’s why the kids like listen to black people and their music. That’s why the kids love Latinos. Your parties suck because they’re monochromatic. Our parties have better food, better music, better-looking women.
Ignore the way that he seems to have the intellectual depth of a C-minus high school student despite his lofty position at the Times. And ignore the way that, at times, he seemed to be directing his speech only to “white supremacists”; it was clear his animosity extended to all whites who are not in the Mamdani wing of the Democratic Party. It’s all there: the contempt, the superiority, the suggestion that his side has won the struggle for our nation. The desire for revenge drips from his tongue; he even resorts to hitting below the belt to dance on what he perceives to be the crushed egos of defeated white men:
Guess what? Some white women, you know, the Western Civilization women, the pure women, the Rust Belt women, the real women, they like some of us brown folks. We don’t take them, they come to us. And then we have kids, these beautiful caramel-skin kids. We’re here, you’ve lost.
Boiling down his rambling hour-long rant to its core, he may as well have said: “We brown people hate you. We have contempt for you, see you as inferior. We are taking your land from you, and you can’t stop us.”
By stating these things with such arrogance, such vehemence, such confidence, he has done the white rights movement a great service. He has given the racial boundary a new coat of paint and broadcast it to the entire nation.
Consider the New York Times audience who purportedly read his columns. It will be largely comprised of educated, prosperous white people in their middle years. They voted for Cuomo, not Mamdani (the Times stopped short of endorsing Cuomo but suggested that Mamdani was not ready for the job of mayor). They are the old Democratic Party, not the new party of AOC, Mamdani, and Ali. For some percentage of them, between the recent mayoral race that elevated a communist Indian Muslim to a position of high authority, and Ali’s comments that leave little room for alternate interpretations, the new reality that the newcomers are not our friends might be starting to sink in a bit.
Nobody should expect some mad rush to our side by huge numbers of the Northeast liberal elite, but for some, Ali’s comments, coming so quickly on the heels of Mamdani’s victory, might start a process of questioning long-held beliefs. And that is where our own march to victory gains strength. For, once that questioning process begins, the facts and reason may eventually lead some white New York Times readers and other similar people throughout the nation to a renewed sense of white identity. Remember that, within our own ranks there are many former liberals or leftists. Some are the most prominent among us: Jared Taylor and Kevin MacDonald, to start. And white New York Times readers have resources, educations, influence, and connections—very welcome additions to our cause, indeed.
It is also a positive sign that Ali is declaring victory already—before a significant number of our people have committed to fighting back. Perhaps, before taking his victory lap, he should recall that less than 100,000 British troops were able to control all of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Or that the Spanish conquered the Aztecs with 600 men. And recall Kipling’s foreboding words: “when the Saxon began to hate.”
But Ali seems possessed by his overwhelming case of ressentiment and could not hold his tongue. He assumes that our temporary weakness is permanent, that our total collapse is inevitable. Yet history has many strange twists and turns, and we are a resourceful people.
You can order Loving Our Own here.
Another miscalculation made by Ali is that he sees all “brown people,” that is, all non-whites, as having some kind of universal brotherhood. The only thing that unites them now is a general sense of ressentiment toward whites; if Ali’s hopes are realized and whites are no longer the majority, hatred of whites will no longer be enough to hold his brown coalition together. They will no longer be able to satisfy their goals by taking resources and power away from whites and will be forced to compete with each other. Such competition will likely take some ugly turns. Perhaps the competing groups will then try to curry favor with whites for advantages against either—with great potential for our exploitation once whites realize that we have common interests.
Outbursts of hatred such as Ali’s are likely to become even more common in the near future; he is hardly the only brown newcomer who thinks like this. Some of them see our continual retreat and feel emboldened to speak out. Others feel threatened by the Trump administration’s sporadic attempts at pushback and become stressed into openly spewing their plans and fears.
And each time they speak their true thoughts, they mark the lines between us more starkly, revealing the deep divisions in interests, culture, and morality that naturally occur between peoples. This will make it easier for whites to see our true position—not as cooperative members of a joint venture for a brighter future, but as targets intended for repression and elimination.
Thank you, Wajahat Ali. Keep speaking out and letting whites know how things really are.
27 comments
I know I am speaking to a friendly crowd, but this Ali fuck-wit is such an obnoxious arsehole, that he’s almost funny. This wanker thinks “our” music sucks? There is so much European music that I like (that spans centuries); what does he like? Punjabi techno?
Bland chicken and dry meat? Is that all? Anyway, isn’t that what him and his culture does?
European cooking versus South Asian and Paki-style porridge. Keep talking your b/s and one day you might even believe it y’self, Ali.
I could go on, but I think I’ll sign off.
Your revulsion regarding the brown monkey Wajahat is warranted, but we must never let White traitor freaks, jew subversives, and coloured monkeys get the best of us. They are all sub-human genetic trash, and they resent us for what we can and do produce, and they cannot. It really galls jews and the coloured monkeys that they must live in White nations in order to have a decent life. Nothing these monkeys have to say is worth anything at all.
There was a fair bit of revulsion there, Hammerhead, but this muppet and his ilk are certainly not getting the better of me.
Cheers, and happy new year. To have many foes is a great honour, and the new year year will present us will many opportunities to increase our honour status. Enjoy the fight.
Those disgusting videos of browns ‘cooking’ like a maniac child finger-painting. And the race-mixing Whites, especially women, NEVER go for disgusting piles of shit like this insufferable rat. Their women are ugly and I guess Gordon Ramsay doesn’t know how to season his food either, huh? What cope-flexing from another useless brown moron.
I meant to add that this “Ali” person is a rather ugly specimen as well.
I have seen this article before. Anyway, he is right about the White women coming to them. I saw a couple at the local grocery store that I frequent in the last three weeks. 🙃
Lol. Fortunately, this is not true. I hope you’re being sarcastic.
No one is yearning for Rajesh.
Indian rates of mixing are low and roughly even between the sexes.
I don’t know what Rajesh is, and I am not being sarcastic. The precedent has already been set in the fact that an increasing number of White women have sought out sub-Saharan blacks for mates. If low I.Q. blacks can easily obtain a White mate, then the pajeet from India will just as easily surpass the low I.Q. black in this field. 🙃
Rajesh is a typical Indian name.
Intelligence has little to do with success in the dating market. If it did, Chinese men would be sweeping up white women with ease.
Confidence and physical strength are more important. Black men have these qualities, plus a preference to date outside of their race. Indians do not have any of them.
Time will tell. 🙃
It’s not common but far from rare to see White women with subcontinentals. They don’t at all lack confidence. Understandable, given the rapidity which they can see themselves subduing the demoralised White man.
Absolutely. Mixers either burn the coal or the beans. Our women would rather fuck Brad Pitt for free than this sand rat for money. Hours-long montages of antiWhite vitriolic rants need to be disseminated on X and elsewhere to force our youth to see exactly what these overconfident things think of us.
I certainly don’t see it where live, Pete.
Sorry for my pessimism but so many white people have been brainwashed into believing this nonsense I wouldn’t expect a huge swath of New York Times left wing intellectuals to suddenly rush into our arms.
Ali’s rant will in no way change their opinions of us. To them we are nothing but knuckle dragging cavemen who deserve to be rounded up and thrown into a gulag. They will still hold out hope that the dusky hordes will take notice of their kindness and virtue. They think they will be welcomed into inclusivity so long as they denounce people like us. Sorry folks, but white liberals are the biggest suckers on earth. I’ll even go as far as to say that 98% of white Times readers were nodding in agreement at every word Ali said.
Could not agree more.
As the kids say, 100%.
This idiot ( and physically repulsive at that ) is jealous, envious of whites and has a massive inferiority complex. Point. I stop reading when this article took this non white clown seriously.
We already had a struggle session over this lolcow, this is old milk.
But this is just typical sub-continental caste thinking. Status obsessed, hierarchical, obsessed with who is dominating who, and filled with delusional gloating.
I do find it funny how these people say the most horrendous shit and make out it’s just “satire”. Which this lolcow immediately did to deflect criticism coming from his supporters on the left. Does anyone actually believe that excuse anymore?
Some white lefties do believe Ali’s rant is satire, others don’t care because they are anti-white themselves.
There is also the issue of context. I got into some arguments with liberals about Ali’s anti-white racism, including on Ali’s Substack page. They deflected by saying that he was going after MAGAs because of Trump’s comments on ending “third-world” immigration. However, I believe this argument falls flat as Ali doesn’t go after “red state culture” such as NASCAR or country music. He targets all white food as bland, our parties as boring and our women as unattractive, which is funny, because in hte same video, he also bragged about brown men and their ability to get white women. Clearly, he is jealous and fuming.
We shouldn’t forget that Wajahat Ali is a brown guy who talks about whites not liking our own culture while living in America as a hardcore San Francisco 49ers fan.
Not only that, he dares to say that white music sucks when everything from K-Pop to Punjabi rap is just browns ripping off black music, which is really sad considering these people do not live near blacks. At least rock music post-1960 is distinctly white and separate from the somewhat black origins of 1950s rock n’ roll.
You have to treat leftist egalitarianism as a religion to properly understand it. Dogmatic followers are resistant to evidence and people aren’t as rational as you’d expect. The “satire” excuse is just them assuming Ali’s rant is in response to actual white insecurities and fears, and he’s playing into it as a response. Black rappers in France who rap about killing off the French and taking over use similar excuses, that it’s emotional hyperbole due to “racism”.
The problem is Ali comes from a part of the world where people have a massive complex over intermarriage and actual incel sexual insecurity is common, which makes the satire angle a bit suspect. Take what he says here, swap out the word “white” for a caste/religion/region, and swap out “brown” for a different caste/region/religion, and it’d sound exactly like the pathetic sexual gloating you see in India all the time. Both Hindus and Muslims are terrified of the other side pulling a “love jihad” on them, where they’ll scoop up the outgroup’s women while mateguarding their own. Women don’t have autonomy in this equation, they’re just considered a sexual battleground in a zero sum game. This leads to actual violence, even though they’re literally from the same race and live right next to each other. On Valentine’s day, in India, virgins organize into gangs to beat and harass people with girlfriends at the local park. They hide their virgin rage through excuses of piousness, saying it’s about making sure unmarried couples don’t sin. Similar to how Ali expresses hostility and sexual grievances through a proxy of “satire” in this instance.
But more to your struggles in advocating these ideas. The biggest stumbling block I’ve found for leftist egalitarians is to ask them “Assuming I’m right, and these racial differences are innate, assuming that the races are not equal, what policies would you enact?”. They can’t actually even answer this hypothetical, even the polite and sympathetic ones start stuttering and can’t affirm a single policy change they’d make. I’m sure white nationalists on here could articulate how their policies would change if the races were proven to be cognitively equal, but leftists can’t do the opposite. The dark conclusion I speculate to be true is that many leftist egalitarians would actually want to sterilize, cull, reduce or kill off certain races if they came to believe and understand the true racial disparities. The most harsh eugenic thinking did find its home on the progressive left for a long time, after all. When you understand that accepting racial differences means they start stumbling into territories they consider dark, you can understand why they resist coming around.
As you say, Derek, he did us a favor by speaking out and defining the boundaries between us and them. As for the NYT readership, maybe it will have some effect, but mostly, they still see themselves as the cosmopolitan cool kids versus the deplorable bitter-clingers. Cool kids eat curry while deplorables eat hamburgers.
No, they’re not coming here for the food or anything else culturally about White America. They’re not here to assimilate.
Assuming egalitarians are correct, how their policies helped ease integration over the past several generations?
There is no one more status obsessed than Trump. #2 is Trump.
This comment is for Peter Quint as the thread ended.
You say that time will tell when it comes to brown men pairing up with white women.
I can say as a Canadian who lives in an area that has a massively increasing brown population, time has shown that they have not been successful with the fairer sex from the fairer race. In fact, the issue has been white men marrying brown women, if anything.
Indians bring a lot of problems. Fortunately, miscegenation isn’t one of them.
Ali’s father, and more likely than not, his grandfather, was pro-White. I came to the States in ‘84 and my grandparents were never anti-White. In fact, my grandma complained of the changing demographic at the American airports as she saw less Native Americans (blonde-haired, blue-eyed).
I had two paternal uncles: one was a dirt-blonde with green-eyes and the other was blue-eyed. These (White) traits were a point of pride. I bet my bottom dollar that Ali would be damn proud of having Paki family members with fair traits.
The problem is that a lot of what he blurbed is true. Non-Whites do not compete the way Whites do.
They are collectivist & tribal by nature, trading with other tribes. They do not value owning land. They see land differently than we do. Something that should not be owned by any man or tribe.
Right now, they’re collectively hating Trump & his supporters.
This international oligarchy that Trump is trying to create will live in their underground cities within 2 generations. The rest of us? They do not give a damn.
That’s why the kids like listen to black people and their music. That’s why the kids love Latinos.
Firstly, this premise is questionable. White identity politics is growing in popularity, especially among young White men. I understand the United States is now majority non-White in the youngest demographics, but even so the popularity of rap music seems to be decreasing, with no rap songs in the Billboard Top 40 occurring this year for the first time since 1990. Black fatigue seems to be extending to their music as well.
Secondly, people listen to that music not because it’s intrinsically better than White music, but because the media and music industry are run by anti-White Jews who promote it because it is so lowbrow. Coincidentally, the reason someone as anti-White as Wajahat ( I still can’t believe that is a real name) Ali is a contributor to America’s newspaper of record is also because Jews run the media!
If Whites, and not Jews, controlled the media in the countries we founded, we would both be spared of listening to what passes for black “music” as well as what passes for “commentary” from people like Ali.
I actually watched the full video this rant was sourced from, and he claimed the Great Replacement wasn’t real because White people are a social construct, and therefore we can’t be replaced! Interestingly, Wajahat also spends all his time worrying that White nationalists want to replace liberal democracy with fascism. Someone needs to inform him that liberal democracy is a social construct, so it can’t be replaced, and he is just engaging in baseless conspiracy theorizing.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.