1,099 words
Last month Sydney Sweeney stirred up a storm by starring in an American Eagle ad, designed to promote the fall 2025 AE fashion line, which featured the phrase, “Sydney Sweeney has Great Jeans.” The wordplay centers on the obvious homonym of jeans and genes – and, from my perspective, the ads were clearly done in a tongue-in-cheek manner. This is an example of one of the clips:
However, in a now deleted video, Sweeney casually repeated the line, “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue.” This caused much weeping and gnashing of teeth among the usual suspects. Leftist media outlets, celebrities, and internet activists argued that the entire campaign was a dog-whistle in support of eugenics, white nationalism, and fascism. The fact that a major company (jokingly) praised a white woman’s appearance, and the genes which underlie it, was unacceptable to the Organized Left. Many argued that it was proof that a cultural transformation was taking place. Feminist authors tended to put less focus on Sweeney’s eye color and more on the fact that she is white and curvy. Meghan Furlano, writing in a piece published by The Conversation, argued that:
With its celebration of Sweeney’s conventionally attractive appearance, American Eagle has reintroduced the “traditional” feminine figure loudly and proudly. In this sense, the campaign symbolizes a changing of the cultural tides: out with body positivity, in with the “amazing rack” and all it signifies.
Furlano’s dismissive comment about Sweeney’s bustline includes a hyperlink to another piece, by Jess Cartner-Morley, which went further by saying that a culture that embraces attraction to large breasts is inherently problematic. The second article, published in The Guardian, includes colorful claims such as:
As a symbol of fertility, full breasts are catnip to a regime obsessed with breeding and keen to limit reproductive freedoms.
Breasts[…] are “visible obstacles to equality, associated with nature and nurture rather than reason and power”.
Such antipathy towards breasts – and male attraction to them – has been common among feminists for ages. I could give examples, from several years ago, of authors arguing that being a self-described “breast man” is potentially sexist and of young women saying that boob guys are racist. Why, one might ask, is there so much focus on male attraction to a woman’s chest? I haven’t seen any similar articles along the lines of “Why Are Leg Guys Weird?” (even though they are, please trust me on this), the focus is always on shaming men for liking cleavage. This trend has become so prominent that one leftist author, Miles Klee, took issue with it and wrote an article entitled “Boob Guys are Not the Enemy.” He couched his arguments in terms like female liberation – which is to say he missed the point.
The attacks on Sweeney, and on female breasts, have very little to do with genuine concern for women or about the pornogriphication of mass marketing. The real reason is that modern feminism is part of a broader anti-white coalition and its supporters don’t like the connotations of an attractive White woman receiving praise.
This is obvious when one looks at the counter-ads that have been produced as a response. Levi’s created several featuring the line, “Beyonce Has Better Jeans.” Another was made by Gap Inc. and features the girl band Katseye. None of the band members are white – the “Swiss star” is half-black – and the ad features an extremely disproportionate number of mixed-race women. In one scene, a group of dancers get down on all fours and point their butts at the camera while doing an interpretive version of donkey kicks (this happens at the 11 second mark). The lyrics “my milkshake is better than yours” play throughout the ad. The obvious implication being that black and mixed-race women are more attractive and have better genes than women like Sweeney.
This ties neatly into the racial undertones of the feminist aversion to breasts. One of ReturnofKing’s most viral articles, published in 2015, pointed out some of the reasons behind America’s embrace of “booty culture.” An analysis of porn searches showed that:
The U.S. is the only first world nation in the Butt column, and that’s primarily because of our large black and Latino populations.
Looking at a state-by-state breakdown, we see the exact same pattern. The states where boobs reign are the whitest ones.
While there are plenty of white “butt guys,” average desires do vary from one race to the next. It’s well known that blacks, in the words of Sir Mix-a-Lot, “like big butts.” When I was in high school, one of the slang terms that black boys (and some white ones) would use for the girls they liked was PAWG: phat ass White girl. Yet I’ve never seen an article by a feminist complaining about that term. This is because feminists are happy to embrace “booty culture” (and the corresponding Africanization of Western culture). They complain about the Dissident Right’s focus on fertility, all while embracing motherhood as a “critical” aspect of black feminism. They attack white women for being too thin and athletic, too curvy and busty, too traditional looking, or “appropriating indigenous styles” when wearing non-European clothes. The goal is to needle and shame white women while promoting the Africanization of Western norms.
There are a sizeable number of White women who are waking up to the implications of this. Whenever I go on TikTok, I find new accounts from women who are doing their best to counter-signal anti-White attitudes. Some have made comedy videos supporting Sweeney:
It’s important for the Dissident Right to avoid falling for demoralization propaganda which tells young men to assume all women are the enemy. While there are many white women who have internalized anti-white ideas, there are also a growing number who are tired of watching a coalition of racial aliens and feminists try to cancel women like Sweeney. One of the simplest steps on our path to success is to engage in local networking and bring high quality people, including women, into our social circles. This is going to become progressively easier as the anti-white coalition continues its devolution. A few years ago, they were telling white women to be quiet and listen to black women, then they went after “Karens,” and now they’re seeing Nazism in a Sydney Sweeney ad. The more they say the quiet part out loud (that they only support white women who reject their own culture and people), the easier it will be for us to gather our best people into a productive movement.
50 comments
Great article! The jews have always got their big hook noses buried in black butt cracks. 🙃
A mental image that is at once amusing and repulsive. Fine work, good sir!
Just like the ghastly Skeksis and negroidal Garthim in the underrated Dark Crystal. And anti-White all-White dependent feminist trash look like Aughra.
Don’t buy any jeans from Levi’s or The Gap Inc.
I take it that American Eagle is not owned by the jews? 🙃
As Tim Kelly put it, the apparent vindication of traditional white beauty in the form of Sydney Sweeny’s “jeans” is just a return to a slightly older form of Jewish subversion or exploitation. Instead of fat black ladies pushing body positivity while spilling grotesquely out of their swimsuits or transgenders masquerading as women, it’s a return to scantily clad pretty white girls or near pornography. Is this a real win? https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757/episodes/2025-08-03T04_48_17-07_00
How prudish do you have to be to call that ad “near pornography?” That discomfort with the human form is unique to the Jewish religions. Europeans were happy to depict fully naked women for centuries. It was recognized as art, and a celebration of the human form.
That art was a celebration of beauty and nobility and was not on display everywhere and always. It was not used as a grotesque, sordid attempt to sell sexuality to the masses for the purpose of making money for grubby little usurers. I prefer Sydney Sweeney to depictions of obese black women and various schemes at false empowerment by obvious social engineers, but using the half naked female form in a deliberately sultry pose to sell a product and maximize profits is not something a healthy society does.
The Sweeney thing will be in the dustbin of history in short time. I’ve had the pleasure of taking a pretty young white girl both clothes and makeup shopping recently. The propaganda in these stores scream at you. There are no Sweeneys there. The models are flat out ugly and mostly black. The posters are saying “you’re not beautiful little white girl. You have to look like Aunt Jemima in a negligee with purple lipstick on in order to be beautiful.” Give it time. In a few months it will be business as usual.
I might have to go to the mall and be an armchair sociologist.
You can’t miss what they’re saying
Taking a white girl clothes shopping sounds like sugar dating which an alarming number of white women are now doing.
did the white thot have any cognitive dissonance? Ive never seen a white woman under 65 have this when confronted with sheer anti whitism from our Jewish media class.
Forget the genes VS jeans part, that’s just to rope you in. This is your typical manipulative commercial – Sweeney looks, talks and acts like a halfwit; it’s embarrassing to watch. It’s not about “good genes”; it’s about a Dumb Blonde fondling her own arse and speaking in a halting, barely coherent manner:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK8s3iqL99c
It is antiWhite, as all ads are. Every last one.
I’m trying to understand what you expect from Sweeney here. She sounds like a halfwit? Is she supposed to be teaching calculus in the ad?
It’s a blue jean advertisement geared toward teenage girls who aren’t shopping for scientific calculators or chemistry sets. They’re shopping for clothes that make them look sexually attractive, and Sweeney is using her bedroom voice. I’m sure she’s not particularly intelligent. Her fame is as an actress playing seductive roles, not as a physicist.
“It’s not about “good genes”; it’s about a Dumb Blonde fondling her own arse and speaking in a halting, barely coherent manner:”
We should all hate and resent the “Dumb Blonde” phrase as an antiwhite slur. There is no basis for it. Blondes are not stupid. There is only one race it demeans: our race.
“It’s not about “good genes”; it’s about a Dumb Blonde fondling her own arse and speaking in a halting, barely coherent manner:”
We should all hate and resent the “Dumb Blonde” phrase as an antiwhite slur. There is no basis for it. Blondes are not stupid. There is only one race it demeans: our race.
That was my point. I guess you are too young to remember the endless “Dumb Blonde” jokes and references in the movies, TV, everywhere in popular culture. This commercial is a full-bore return to that. They have a blonde girl talking and behaving stupidly about – a pair of pants?! She is an actress, doing precisely what she was paid to do by American Eagle.
AE knew damn well there’d be a negative response with the genes/jeans business, thereby providing an excuse for more and more antiWhite invective. Any increase in sales of AE jeans is incidental. It was not about the money.
I agree with Joe. The idea that blonde women are less intelligent than other White women seems to be false. This 2016 study found that blonde women have a slightly higher mean IQ than brunettes or redheads.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305222263_Are_Blondes_Really_Dumb
I agree. But like so much these days, the Left’s response to it has had the virtue of drawing the battle lines more clearly.
Hi Stronza, you bring up interesting points.
For the record, I am not claiming that AE’s ad was pro-White. I am mainly focusing on how the Left’s reaction to it shows an anti-White bias, how the same feminists who write articles shaming men for common heterosexual desires have zero problems with forms of sensuality that they stereotype as “non-White” (J-Lo did a music video called “Booty” and has been described as a Feminist, but Sweeney is mocked for having a big chest – obviously many White men are “butt guys” but in American culture there are racial stereotypes about preferences), and the fact that the constant needling of White women is starting to provoke a reaction.
The only reason I saw the actual commercial was on links to it on dissident websites; probably the same is true of most of the commenters here. I did not take it to be pro-White, or even a “dog whistle”, because I know that the advertising industry (and the fashion industry) is virulently anti-White. Its an attempt to manipulate the average Joe and Jane Whitey into thinking that the advertising propaganda industry has seen the error of its ways, and that, “Hey, it’s okay to be White. Really, it is! You don’t need to cut the cord by tuning out and going your own way.” And on cue, the utterly predictable backlash of seething lefties and triple doses of fat, ugly black women everywhere else. Yes, this advertising campaign knew exactly what the results would be: massive free advertising! American Eagle is Jewish-owned, of course.
I found the ad embarrassing, too; but I was only embarrassed for Miss Sweeney. That ridiculous tone of voice sounded infantile, not seductive.
Its an attempt to manipulate the average Joe and Jane Whitey into thinking that the advertising propaganda industry has seen the error of its ways, and that, “Hey, it’s okay to be White. Really, it is! You don’t need to cut the cord by tuning out and going your own way.”
Very good. Sly & slimy win the day (they think).
“Furlano’s dismissive comment about Sweeney’s bustline includes a hyperlink to another piece, by Jess Cartner-Morley, which went further by saying that a culture that embraces attraction to large breasts is inherently problematic.”
Excellent! I needed a good laugh today!
That is very funny. So many upset liberals must over-analyze natural emotions and healthy instinctual, fertility-related, attraction. Buxomness is very practical with regard to fertility/infant care, specifically, the ability to sustain nourishment for twin babies every 4 hours.
Indeed so. The way I see it, pearl-clutching over natural and normal preferences rooted in evolutionary biology doesn’t make sense. If you found Dolph Lundgren to be more attractive than Woody Allen, I’d be neither surprised nor offended.
Rat face allen probably finds Dolph Lundgren more attractive than his wife/stepdaughter or whatever she is.
Don’t forget that the modern feminist movement was launched by a bunch of frumpy women bitching outside of the Miss America Pageant. I would argue that the basic root of feminism is slave morality envy of better looking women – i.e. “I don’t look good, so looking good is evil and oppressive.”
The critics overlooked the symbolism of the classic mustang she tears out of there in, I didn’t—pure thoroughbred! Look at the girl; look at that car; hear the roar of that engine—classic American thoroughbred all the way! 🙃
Background of American Eagle Outfitters Inc. :
https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/american-eagle-outfitters-inc-history/
[Source “International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 55. St. James Press, 2003.”]
“When American Eagle Outfitters was launched in 1977, it was part of Silvermans Menswear, Inc., a retailing company whose flagship was the Silvermans chain …”
“[ca 1991] In a deal designed to position American Eagle for renewed growth, the Schottenstein family bought the 50 percent of RVI owned by the Silverman family, giving the Schottensteins full control of the company and its only chain. Jay L. Schottenstein became the new chairman and CEO of RVI …”
“In November 1993 an American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. subsidiary was established and it was under this name that RVI and the American Eagle chain emerged in April 1994, with a listing on the NASDAQ stock exchange and with the Schottenstein family maintaining roughly a 60 percent stake in the new company”
Jay Schottenstein returned as CEO in 2015.
Around 2000, his family funded the “The Geraldine Schottenstein Cultural Center on the Midtown Campus of Yeshiva University in New York City”, whose director “praised the Schottenstein family for being in the forefront of leadership and philanthropy on behalf of Yeshiva University and Jewish life.” (link: https://web.archive.org/web/20060911070438/http://www.yu.edu/news_stories/june2003/schottenstein.html ).
Moreover, a 2001 list of “The 30-plus most influential Jews in America” included Jay Schottenstein ( https://archive.is/o5iOO ).
Addenda:
Being bedazzled by mere appearances is the hallmark of low intelligence, and this thing is a great example of the phenomenon. No wonder elites feel so much contempt towards the average American –
a) the Left has a knee-jerk reaction to a decently attractive White woman and a pun with “genes”
b) the conspiracy crowd views this as further evidence that Nazis and Eugenicists are secretly running the big corporations [“See, I told you Alex Jones was right mate!”]
c) the Right takes it as evidence for “our guys” being in charge and/or the “free market” finally self-correcting
… when it’s really just a business family of a certain background manufacturing a scandal for $ and/or tribal reasons. Most media consumers fail to even ask the decisive questions: Who is actually behind [x]/in control of [x] and why now?
Instead, they “enjoy the show” [to quote Q, arguably the most successful “PSYOP” in recent history].
“The military calls their psychological warfare tactics … PSY-OPs. The private sector calls it … Public Relations. Through television, and now on-line platforms, we are bombarded with propaganda, daily we are being mediated by bad actors … foreign and domestic” [John Heart/TekGnostic]
These leftists/neo-liberal mutant variants are absolutely repulsive and extremely loathsome. Nothing but total contempt for everything European on whom their worthless lives depend for everything. They have a schizoidal-negroidal hatred of beauty, hatred of good sense, of decency, sanity, aesthetics, family, children…it’s endless. Is schottenstein the same family that has a 77 volume set of nearly 10,000 pages of the talmud in English and hebrew available?
D’awwww, warms my heart!
A balanced physique is best. That being said, I’m a “butt man”, to use the vulgar parlance of this degenerate epoch. And I think that’s all right and, I daresay, quite White. There’s certainly a precedent for it in White art, as well. I don’t favor the “phat ass” that the subsaharans prefer. Such an ass is disproportionate. Gelatinous, overly-protruding, too spherical, comical, and absurd. I also find the type of modern, low bodyfat %, hard, overly-muscled, and protruding “gym ass” that many White women are building these days to be disproportionate. The wide backside is underappreciated. I prefer a wide ass – even if flat – to a narrow one even if the narrow ass protrudes favorably. I think the width of an ass might have more to do with skeletal and hormonal factors than with exercise-related or directly dietary ones. I think gyms and BBLs are spoiling the physiques of many women…(but not to the same extent that overeating is).
Those vile asses-it looks like she took a dump in her pants. Yoga/pilates asses are preferable to the bulky porterhouse butts of softball pitchers and shot putters but either will suffice.
Even just walking and not eating like a pig should result in a decent butt for most normal White women. If a woman still isn’t satisfied with the results, she could add in some light stair climbing, calisthenics, or other light exercise. Dancing can build an amazing body. Yoga is demonic and so it should be avoided, but in essence you’re saying light exercise is effective and I agree with that. The “need” for a woman to go to a gym and do squats all day while chugging protein shakes is a jew-induced mental disorder.
They hate to see a White girl succeed.
The Sweeney controversy reminds me of the situation with women’s basketball star Caitlin Clark in the WNBA. Clark has drawn thousands of new fans, and the league has exploded in popularity, but many of the Black players resent her for it because she’s White and better looking than them.
White Girl Summer is a wonderful time of year, but some people are just too bitter and jealous to enjoy it. It’s a shame.
If that’s the case, then maybe we should encourage sports fans to wear Caitlin Clark’s jersey. I would rather see whites wear that than the jersey of some black athlete who has contempt for the white fans who support the team that he plays for.
This is a really good idea, actually.
Caitlin Clark is the Steph Curry of the league which has become a morton downey jr. clowny joke of a league. Three dildos thrown on the court in one week, to the odious, extremely unlikable nature of those black female? players. Clark should be seen as a godsend to the WNBA, instead they treat her like she’s a cancer.
Pure slop.
You are banned from commenting here.
The whole “She got what she voted for question” should be addressed more by the movement. It was also all over the Scottish girl axe incident this past week, that sort of infighting. We don’t need it right now, women are actually coming to our side. Try to find young white women at pro-refugee protests nowadays, it’s not 2015 anymore, they’re not doing that stuff.
But on the topic of the article, and this may sound really pathetic to white nationalists, but it’s legitimately true, a good deal of the ethnic resentment towards us is over looks. We tend to think in the movement in terms of IQ tests, civilizational potential, etc, but the formative experiences for people come during those young teenage and early 20s years, when it comes down to who at school you’re dating and what you can do to attract him or her. The non-white ethno-nationalist communities online like r/asianidentity (one of the my favorite lolcow zoos) simultaneously have anti-white rhetoric right alongside a burning obsession to date white women, where they discuss how to and praise others for doing so, yet they’ll also seethe endlessly about the reverse. Absolutely zero self awareness.
It’s also absolutely hilarious when an Asian woman stumbles in being supportive and gets completely blindsided by the hypocrisy, and double hilarious when one tells them to “stop being weird about who Asian women choose to date” and there’s 500+ posts of seethe, people get banned and the thread gets locked.
The darker thing about representation in the media is that it’s no longer just about jewish shenanigans. Non-white women are brooding and envious towards white women, know they’ll stratify at the top as the models and starlets, and so instinctively lash out at any pro-white messaging. And many of the non-white migrants in the west are giddy and happy for the only representation whites have involving them, it’s a form of possessiveness, take a look at how they talk about it. They are actual white supremacists in their hearts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/aznidentity/comments/rxhacd/is_it_time_we_start_asking_where_are_all_the_high/
For all the white nationalists who think about how white men and women are uniquely at odds, you’d never see that level of hypocritical rhetoric on any pro-white space. You’d certainly be banned from commenting here if you did the same, we are actually doing pretty well in that department.
>There are a sizeable number of White women who are waking up to the implications of this. Whenever I go on TikTok, I find new accounts from women who are doing their best to counter-signal anti-White attitudes. Some have made comedy videos supporting Sweeney:
What was once a minor annoyance to white women with token representation is fast becoming a threat to them. They lost basically all their Disney princess movies to envious non-white women weaponizing “euro-centric beauty standards”, they can’t watch their 19th century romance shows without non-whites being there, and they know how these non-women actually feel about them because they’re being more audacious about their rhetoric at schools as their numbers grow.
Excellent comment.
Great article. All of our men should be well dressed, confident and suave in public. All of us have a duty, even if we are in a relationship, to be gentleman in public and flirt, flatter and otherwise be engaging and warm with our women without being creepy. They had so expertly divided our women and our men. This is a good sign. They had it all set up for a long slow, quiet victory, but not being able to help themselves is providing opportunities.
Seemingly unrelated but not is that this is all the more reason not to abandon our institutions. Woman want power and status. If we abandon our institutions, they will just mate with Indian and Chinese men as they obtain more and more wealth and power and we recede. Despite the pogroms and the obstacles we must remain tenacious and claim our spaces.
We are in a great fight. If we run to it with dignity and honor, the best of our women will be attracted to that and come with us.
To those who are deprecating Sweeney, because she doesn’t come across as a rocket scientist, I expect white women to mate with white men, and have at least three children (preferably more)—barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen. There is a better chance of this if she is attractive. 🙃
I don’t like non-Whites bad-mouthing White women. They are our women; if anyone should put them in their place we will.
Actually White men are more inclined to take their women seriously and to treat them kindly than are men of any other race, and this is a good, meritorious thing about White men. So the biologically natural situation of White women is that a White women shouldn’t have to consider the opinions of any non-Whites, whether they are obnoxious non-White men or catty non-White women jealous of the superior beauty of White women, and White women should be folded securely into White families with White children from White husbands who will treat their wives better than non-Whites would.
This is the sort of ideal we should be aiming at.
When antiwhites and jealous non-Whites are bad-mouthing a beautiful White women we should not join the nasty chorus talking about “dumb blondes” and things like that.
The proof is irrefutable! Seeth on nons:
https://youtu.be/SoHpSY3IoAI?si=RqqQ4ZgfNzW_VPcc
But we should also be badmouthing coloreds and punch down to their puny degradation levels where they belong, mocking their sumo noses, blunt lips, foul stink, patrick ewing chimp face lookalikes, their feral nature, bonehead stupidity, where the fuck is dad?, and blatant furious envy of superior White looks and culture. Sydney Sweeney vs gwen berry? Please. No more Mr. Nice White Guy. We have astute political brilliance in all spaces with podcasts and the written word. Turn up the temperature of the burn by brutally mocking and trashing them as HT, Gypsycrusader, and streamerwaffen do, reminding them that they want to be White (beyonce, michael jackson, always moving into White areas) and even their skin tones are descriptive of White people: fair, warm, deep, and cool. People who dismiss such antics as mere anti-intellectual edgelordism should realize the number of attractors these guys have, even a few colored fans cause Whites baring teeth is new and refreshing for them to see Whites punch back and stand up for themselves for the first time in their lives, something cuckservayids on the way out are too weakly limp and raceless to dare attempt.
I’ll be a bit of an historian for a moment and use an example of how advertising has changed over the years. Back in the eighties, Brooke Shields use to do a commercial for Jordache Jeans. She was young and attractive. The jeans that she wore highlighted her body. Back then a commercial like that wasn’t controversial. The only people who disliked it were a lot of parents because their daughters might ask them to buy a pair of these overpriced jeans. Another example were commercials for an aftershave called High Karate from the early seventies. The commercials were ridiculous, but fun to watch. In these commercials, a man would put on High Karate aftershave, and a woman would become very sexually aggressive toward the guy, usually chasing after the him. In some of the commercials it would be several women chasing a man who had put this aftershave on. Everyone in the commercial was white. The women in these commercials were all attractive white women. Commercials like that couldn’t be made today without enraging feminists. There were several of these High karate commercials, but YouTube only has a few of them.
Bigfoot,
You bring up some good points here, and I’m going to elaborate.
The middle aged dad in me, the adult in me, and the prude in me, all dislike hypersexualized advertisements. I don’t particularly like the narcissism that these ads (and their products) create. Those 3 parts of me also agree on a certain level with certain feminist talking points on the issue. Not all points, and not for all the same reasons, but sometime I do come to similar conclusions. I don’t have a daughter, but if I did I would want her to demonstrate that she is good marriage material by being kind, warm, nurturing, empathetic and motherly. The difference between that desire for me, and whatever motives that feminists have for wanting certain things, is that I would want my daughter to put her empathy toward motherhood and creating the next generation of our people. The culture at large wants white women to be the leverage against white men that allows non-whites to steal our birthright from us. Nurturing is good as long as it’s for immigrants and their families. Empathy is good as long as it is for people living in black ghettos. Kindness is good as long as it is not judgmental toward sexual deviants and as long as it is used to neuter masculine attitudes in men.
So sexualizing women too much and directing all of their thoughts, feelings, and emotions toward narcissism has the effect, to me, of wrecking the concept of healthy pair bonding, and it’s just another vector through which our society rejects pre-1960s values in order to make way for the new world order where whites are powerless and alienated.
On the other hand, there is another side of me that does see some good in drawing attention to beautiful white people, especially when their whiteness is the quality that is being emphasized.
Having said that, I fully expect that American Eagle has in the works a men’s jeans advertisement scheme. The same ideas about genes can be conveyed about someone like, for instance, Patrick Mahomes, the KC Chiefs quarterback. His father is a black athlete baseball player. His mother Randi Mahomes is an attractive white woman (and an internet search of her younger self shows that she had great “genes”, even if she wasn’t blonde). So Patrick Mahomes has athletic genes from his father and many of the positive white genes from his mother that contribute toward his intelligence as a quarterback. There is a precedence of using NFL quarterbacks in jeans advertisements. Brett Favre was the Wrangler jeans spokesman for a time I believe. A little more subtle, without using the genres pun, but his athletic physique and rugged good looks were used to sell blue jeans. Make no mistake, AE outfitters doesn’t care about white nationalism. They’re just being sensational to drive sales, and if veering off toward encouraging mulatto hybridization can create a similar frenzy, they’ll to it.
If ruggedness is their chased look, they should go after Wyoming-to-Buffalo QB Josh Allen, or Burrow. Very unfortunate the former married a steinfeld.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.