2,997 words
Who is behind all this summer’s protests of ordinary white British people outside asylum hotels and hostels right across the nation? Logic would dictate that the main answer would be “ordinary white British people”, but no, it is in fact the special child-rape wing of the NSDAP.
Some left-wingers in the UK appear never to have watched a WWII movie all the way to the end, and so do not realize the Nazis finally lost. They apparently have all seen Tinto Brass’ Salon Kitty, however, and so seem to believe that “Nazi” is also a synonym for “rapist” or “pervert”. Hence, reflecting this paranoid theory that Nazi woman-abusers are secretly responsible for all the anti-migrant protests, the below image of a female pro-migrant agitator, dead of both eyes and brain, bearing a hysterical ‘anti-fascist’ placard outside a British migrant hotel, has gone viral online:
To test this theory out, naïve trustafarians in tie-dye shirts like her should be locked up in an asylum hotel for a month with all the inmates; they’ll soon find out what a true Lebensborn convent looks like these days, and it won’t be being run by the Schutzstaffel any more.
Hostel Intent
As usual, the truth is precisely the reverse way around to that presented by the left. The main reason so many British people are protesting outside asylum accommodation is due to rising awareness of the number of rapes and sexual assaults reportedly being committed against underage white females across the country by illegal boat-people and other such incomers under the umbrella of Islam. A very definite image is now beginning to form in the public mind of the stereotypical non-white immigrant being a potential Koran-bashing child-rapist and woman abuser. How best to counter this propagandistically unfortunate image?
One way to do so might be for the left to smear opponents as being ideologically extreme sex-offenders themselves, whether they are or are not. Then, people like the “I FEEL SAFER WITH REFUGEES THAN FASCISTS” woman would be able to point with satisfaction towards supposed rapey anti-immigrant Nazis rallying outside hotels in order to support her childish point.
One man chosen to receive this rather libelous-seeming treatment is Richard Donaldson, a 33-year-old former soldier who says he left the British Army because it was becoming “quite woke”, before setting up something called the Great British National Protest (GBNP), not to be confused with the British National Party (BNP), although some would quite like you to get that impression.
GBNP is devoted towards helping arrange protests outside asylum hotels all across the UK – protests which, to be perfectly honest, would probably have been going to happen organically thanks to local popular demand for such things anyway. I could go online and attempt to “arrange” mass attendance at a Premier League soccer match, but when 55,000 people turn up at Anfield Stadium on a Saturday anyway, like they always do, could I really take the credit for it just because I had made a few Facebook posts? No doubt Donaldson is doing his bit, but headlines like that in the nation’s newspaper of record The Times for 5 August, reading “Former soldier leads anti-migrant protests around the country” are a bit misleading. [1] What does that word “leads” there really mean?
Usefully, Donaldson professes to have compiled a list of every hotel currently being used to house migrants all across the UK, which is great from a researcher’s perspective, but presumably the locals who will be the main attendees at protests outside any given hotel will already know where the nearest rapefugee warehouse to their own home is anyway, so will have no need of Donaldson’s database. If you live in Dundee, maybe it’s nice to know there are three migrant hotels located in Norwich too, but it’s the one in Dundee you’re actually going to be yelling outside, isn’t it?
Still, it’s nice for the mainstream media to pretend there’s an evil mastermind behind all these things, pulling all the strings from the shadows without. If someone was saying that about a rich Jewish agitator like George Soros helping organize and fund BLM protests back in 2020, that would automatically be a mere false antisemitic conspiracy theory, but when it’s an allegedly far-right British guy doing it, it must be the truth. Or is it?
For their profile of Donaldson, The Times seemed content to take their cue from a previous investigation into the man published in mid-July by Hope Not Hate (HNH), who advertise themselves to be an anti-fascist organization, the UK’s rough equivalent of America’s ADL or SPLC. However, since there are very few genuine fascists in the country at present anywhere other than inside HNH’s own minds, they have to content themselves with “exposing” people like Richard Donaldson instead.
Laundering Cash
The most logically effective way of discrediting Donaldson might be to depict him as a mere fantasist. A recent investigation into the man by Searchlight magazine, another leading British anti-fascist outlet, gave its opinion that Donaldson was simply pretending to have organized protests, turning up to events which would have happened anyhow, and then pleading for donations so he could then “organize” some more.
According to Searchlight, Donaldson was so foolish as to post an open admission online that he was using donors’ cash not only to print flyers and placards, but also to pay off his mortgage, purchase food and clothing, and even repair his faulty washing-machine (admissions he now appears to deny). Given that The Times claimed he had received £31,000 in public donations through the crowdfunding site GoFundMe, that must have been one badly malfunctioning washing-machine.
Hope Not Hate’s exposé of Donaldson’s actions seemed to reveal figures may not be the campaigner’s strong suit. One of his protests was to be held on Dover Beach, where many of the boats carrying illegals into Britain land. Following the fine work of his “analytical predictions team”, Donaldson publicly forecast that, so popular had his posts about the rally been, as many as 16 million people were expected to be in attendance; there probably aren’t even 16 million grains of sand on Dover Beach, so to expect 16 million people to fit on it would not be remotely plausible. As such, Donaldson soon rounded his estimated attendance figure down a notch: to 10 million. Then he shaved it down again, to 9 million. It’s a wonder the “anti-fascists” didn’t claim this was all just practice for Donaldson having a big future in the Holocaust denial industry.
Donaldson later explained this was all just part of a jokey social media trick intended to artificially boost attendance by making the assembly sound more popular than it really would be, but if so the ploy did not work. [2] A generous estimate might suggest 250 persons at most turned up. Searchlight estimated about 50 of these were “hard-core fascists” whilst the rest of the crowd were “made up of racist families”, whatever they are. I imagine The Waltons, but with burning crosses.
Had a few dinghies happened to make shore during the meeting, therefore, the anti-immigrant protestors would actually have been badly outnumbered by the immigrants, especially now that they’re floating in 106 to a dinghy. GBNP’s excuse for the low turnout was as follows: 
Would 16 million people have fit onto the trains in any case? (That sounds like another oblique Holocaust denial reference.) There must have been a surprising number of facilities for that same number of people “to park miles away” too.
I personally know nothing about Richard Donaldson, his means nor motives, nor the current status of his troublesome washing machine. Yet, if the above reports are correct, it may well be legitimate for left-wing organizations to present him as being a bit of a dreamer with a taste for making overblown claims. Mockery, therefore, might seem a rational route for the left to go down when attempting to discredit organized anti-migrant protests like this, as seen in the following post from yet another UK ‘anti-fascist’ groupuscle, Truth Against Hate:
But there is a problem with this tactic, isn’t there? Because if you’re going to imply Donaldson is inept and has no meaningful public support beyond around 250 “hard-core fascists” and “racist families”, then this rather contradicts the competing leftist line that individuals like him are the secret string-pullers who are truly behind the much, much larger nationwide anti-immigrant protests, which several thousands of people genuinely have attended. Can you be an evil mastermind and a comical blunderer simultaneously? Only if you are Dr. Evil from Austin Powers, maybe.
Failing the Smear Test
An alternative ploy, therefore, would be to try and discredit all the ordinary British anti-migrant protestors by smearing their basic cause by attempting to draw an exaggerated association between it and the reported actions and opinions of men like Donaldson. And the basic cause of the great mass of anti-migrant protestors is an inarguably righteous one: to stop their kids getting groomed and molested by State-subsidized rapists from Afghanistan and Somalia. This is also what Richard Donaldson says he wants to do, by Hope Not Hate’s own admission:
Donaldson, like many far-right activists, has positioned himself as a savior for women. He often reposts content focusing on sexual violence towards British women by migrant men, and advocating for stronger laws to protect victims of rape. His recent posts have focused on British men rising against “foreign rape gangs”, [do note the inverted commas – HNH must be clarifying that many of the Pakistanis responsible technically have full British passports] fighting back against the injustice of sexual violence.
Nothing wrong with those sentiments, you may say, except HNH quickly then imply they are completely insincere on Donaldson’s behalf, because he has in the past tweeted his support for white men like Donald Trump and Russell Brand, both of whom have been accused of rape themselves. Therefore, argue HNH, Donaldson is “incredibly selective about who he holds accountable for sexual violence. Despite his best efforts to convince us otherwise, he is certainly no advocate for survivors of abuse, evidenced by his continuous support for Trump.”
Also, he once called Kamala Harris a “slut”, thus meaning Donaldson must be a rampant misogynist: 
Maybe he just wanted to insult the woman and “slut” was simply the first slur that came to mind?
Far worse, though, is HNH’s clearly misleading exploitation of the following post from Donaldson in which, in response to the apparent harassment of underage white British girls in a park by foreign males, he said “It’s time [for British men] to protect what is ours.”
Maybe that tweet was indeed somewhat clumsily phrased, but it’s obvious what Donaldson meant here: chivalrous white British men should step in to protect white British children from being raped by outside invaders. But, instead, HNH seem to pretend to believe they think Donaldson’s words actually mean something like “Hey! Why are we letting Pakis rape all the nice white kids? They’re our rightful jail-bait, not theirs!” when there is no evidence whatsoever he thinks any such thing. In HNH’s own description:
Donaldson is not concerned about protecting women from abuse, shown by his support for violent men like Trump, but is concerned about British men protecting women he considers ‘theirs’. Referring to the young women facing assault in the video as ‘ours’ is indicative of the far-right attitude that rape is a violation of what belongs to British men, not a violation of the victim herself.”
This critique is then widened out to somehow apply to anti-migrant protestors as a whole, who now likewise stand exposed as supposedly not truly caring about the sexual abuse of children at all, just about exploiting such an emotive subject for wider racist political ends:
Standing with the victims of grooming gangs would be an honourable and powerful action if it were not against a backdrop of support for other [alleged] perpetrators of sexual violence [like Trump and Brand]. The hypocrisy exposes a hole in Donaldson’s movement which is consistent across the far right, whereby activists decry abuse from non-white men but turn a blind eye, or in some cases actively support, white powerful sexual abusers. This shows that it was never the abuse which motivated their activism, but the opportunity that abuse gave them to exploit a racist narrative.
Hope Not Hate’s website even features an entire article listing alleged and proven pedophiles associated with the various past and present organizations of the prominent English anti-Islam protestor and activist Tommy Robinson. The overall implication is clear. That dizzy bint with the “I FEEL MUCH SAFER WITH REFUGEES THAN FASCISTS” sign we met at the start of this article was correct: you’re more likely to get raped by a ‘Nazi’ (as people like HNH seem to think all people opposed to mass immigration must inevitably be) than by an illegal asylum seeker.
Ominous Signs
But wait! Let’s take a closer look at that photo of the lefty placard-waver again.
She’s not the only one waving signs there, is she? And, if we zoom in on one of them using the magic of contemporary computing technology, we can see that one of them looks like this:
“SMASH FASCISM”, it says, on behalf of something called The Socialist Worker. UK readers will immediately recognize this as the name of a British far-left newspaper, associated with an equally neo-Marxist political outfit, the Socialist Workers’ Party (SWP). What is the SWP’s historic attitude towards matters of rape? Not good.
In 2013, a rape allegation was made against a high-up male SWP official, identified at the time only as “Comrade Delta”, by a 19-year-old female comrade, which led to at least one other woman coming forward and professing to have been similarly abused too. These led to in-house “kangaroo courts” being fashioned, in which one complainant was reportedly harshly questioned about her previous sex-life and drinking habits and, in the words of left-wing newspaper The Guardian, “branded a slut”. That’s a bit worse than just calling Kamala Harris that same thing on the Internet as a joke, isn’t it?
According to one account, which referred to Comrade Delta by his true name of Smith:
Large parts of the organisation operated a loyalty test: if you were willing to back Smith, you could remain in the party. If not, you were told to leave. The atmosphere, at its worst, was as hostile as could be. Members of Smith’s personal anti-fascist bodyguard, men in the late 40s, spat in the faces of a woman in her 20s who disagreed with them. Smith’s supporters threatened to beat up another young, male critic. People were silenced, jeered, told to their faces to leave.
Such kangaroo courts are said to have dealt with the rape allegations rather leniently without even bothering to report them to the police, before explaining this fact away to members as being because the SWP had “no faith in the bourgeois court system to deliver justice.” Sounds almost as bad as sharia – hence the current Islamo-leftist alliance increasingly being cemented in place across Great Britain, perhaps?
These allegations of the way the Party dealt with the affair must presumably not have been entirely baseless, as last year the SWP felt moved to put out an official apology for their conduct in this matter, conduct which the organization admitted could easily have been construed at the time as being one of “rape apologism”. And yet, wherever you go across the UK at the moment in search of anti-migrant protests, in contrast to all the amateurish but sincere home-made and home-painted signs telling the invaders to swim back home to Rapeistan, you will inevitably find row upon row of professionally printed signs bearing SWP logos or that of its in-house newspaper The Socialist Worker. Look, you can even buy them at 50 pence a pop on the paper’s website, to glue onto a piece of hardwood at home before going out Nazi-bashing with them:
Here, then, we have an extremist political organization, who, unlike Richard Donaldson, really do appear to possess the capacity to flood the streets of Great Britain with several thousand de facto Sturmabteilung members, and whose highest echelons really do have a history of alleged rape apologism and cover-up behind them. [3] Aren’t the SWP every bit as guilty of hypocritically hiding their own double-standards upon the ever-emotive issue of sexual abuse for political ends themselves too, therefore? So come on, Hope Not Hate, where’s your investigation into the SWP’s sinister role in all the migrant-related street-protests sweeping Britain at the moment, then?
Oh, that’s right: nowhere. Nowhere at all. And it never will be.
For this silly hippie fool in the photo to march along in the company of a gang of Marxists whose own organization is explicitly known for reportedly belittling rape victims and attempting to dismiss their complaints as being politically inconvenient to them holding a sign saying “I FEEL MUCH SAFER WITH REFUGEES THAN FASCISTS” represents either the very height of hypocrisy, or, if the woman just doesn’t know about the allegations against Comrade Delta, of ignorance. A better sign to hold aloft may have read “I EVEN FEEL SAFER WITH SOMALIS THAN WITH THE SWP”, but if she’d turned up holding one like that I doubt she would have been allowed to go on the march in the first place.
Notes
[1] That was the headline in the print version of The Times, anyway; online, they went with a different one.
[2] You may think Donaldson would have been careful about posting inflated figures of likely attendance at his rallies, having already been wildly deflated when broadcasting his belief that 500,000 persons nationwide would be turning out for a national day of protests outside asylum accommodation earlier this summer; disappointingly, nothing like this number actually came out to wave banners and placards at his so-called Great British National Strike at all.
[3] Although it must be remembered that some SWP members simply attend protests and hand out their pre-printed placards to general unaffiliated protestors, thereby making the organization seem to have much more public support than it actually does.
28 comments
As the proverb goes, if leftists didn’t have double standards, they wouldn’t have any standards at all. That one’s both funny and maddening at the same time.
Good article! I’m glad we sided with Britain in WWI, and WWII. 🙃
Ah, like the sarcasm of the Bard.
Yeah, the USA needed to have a strong military as befitting a continental superpower, but it should not have taken sides in the two World Wars.
🙂
“Ah, like the sarcasm of the Bard.”
As a master of language Shakespeare knew it was preferrable to say hoist rather than hoisted, even though it is grammatically incorrect.
There was a Jim Goad article, might have been here, where he wrote “hoist on his own retard.”
https://ihr.org/other/unknownwarriorsdevlin
Thank you.
And I am grateful for the US’s valiant although tragically unsuccessful efforts to wean Britain away from non-white immigration and Jewish influence.
That was a deft use of a “coordinating conjunction” to start a sentence, and begin a paragraph. 🙃
De-Italicized yankee guineas like me hear the constant mockery that we’re not really White, mocking my mother’s mustache, and Fat Tony who knows a guy that knows a guy, but boy, am I glad that the lion’s roar of Fascism and Romanness is still calling from somewhere in the blood. As always with sad ol’ England, may the palace burn and fall.
I swear there’s very few believers in diversity and multiculturalism anymore. All the people that remain in support of it either have a patronized government job that supports it, are so elderly they don’t care about the future, are sycophantic to government power and enjoy being on the protected side at protests, or are non-whites discretely advancing their group interests.
If things one day reverse, I strongly believe all these leftists types will simply flip across without a second thought, and may even become more dedicated pro-whites than the average person. Leftist numbers are substantially lower than they actually appear. I think it was Goebbels, when commenting on the beefsteak Nazis (Communists who flipped to becoming Brownshirts, brown on the outside, red in the middle), found that the Communist converts were pretty fanatical and loyal. It was the mild Social Democrats that could never really be made into proper Nazis. Most of these modern leftists won’t ever risk anything substantial in service of diversity. Comparisons to the Soviet Union are trite, but I think at the moment it’s comparable to the 1980s where nobody actually believes the ideology anymore.
The geriatrification of the left really should sound some more alarm bells for them, they’re losing numbers to natural attrition so fast. It’s a total reversal of the days when it was the hippie youth that were rebelling against the square older people. They really don’t want non-whites leading the conversation either, because then the true ethnic nature of the conflict will be revealed for everyone to see. Whites on one side, non-whites on the other.
I wish I could be so optimistic. Rather than educable Spartacists like in the good old days, we’re amidst hordes of fanatics whose soft heads have been marinated in their stupid ideology to the point that it’s a religion for them. Some of them will grow out of it, but unfortunately the mind-virus has taken on a life of its own. As Yuri Bezmenov put it long ago:
“Most of the people who graduated in the sixties, drop outs or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern.”
As he put it, doing something about this will require 15-20 years to educate another generation in normal values. (Obviously this would require recapturing opinion-forming institutions first.) Until then, keeping these NPCs from making trouble is going to be a big problem.
That’s a really excellent comment, Chud. I completely agree.
I will embellish : when we talk of the Left we often mean culturally left – antiwhite, feminist, etc. But the economic left are still represented among the cultural left.
I would like to make the point that the nonwhites don’t give a monkeys about economic socialism. That’s a deep point with many facets, but just for now consider Chinese attitudes to workers rights (non existent) black attitudes to gangsterism (surely the most pure form of capitalism), worship of wealth (bling), and the Illuminati. White attitudes to the illuminati tend to be “evil bad guys who rule the world: sinister, evil, secret, duplicitous, paedophile, etc”. Black attitudes to the illuminati are “whooa dem dudes is bad-ASS! Sheeeit? Dey rule da world, n sheit? Get me some o dat bruh!” Blacks just worship the big alpha CEO. They want to be him, and subjugate other blacks. They don’t have this concern with equality we do.
Also cf. Indian attitudes, and even the Japanese were always fervent anti Communists. The only non group who have embraced Socialism is Sudamericans. I’d like to know why that is.
The Leftist coalition is very weak and truly all it has going for it is anti white hate. Once that becomes unpopular, let the chaos begin.
If Christianity, if the Bible explicitly opposed miscegenation, which aligns with the Laws Of Nature, we would not have multiracial societies. Christians would adhere & quote the Bible. This would definitely solve & prevent our path to being exterminated. It is not controversial, actually, it is factual that the Laws Of Nature oppose race mixing for the simple reason that it would lead to the extermination of biodiversity.
There sort of is a precedent, in which the Israelites are commanded to divorce their foreign wives. (It’s in the Book of Ezra, if memory serves.) One time, I showed that to a fundamentalist who was tempted to mix with Blacks, and it set her straight on that. Now she has five beautiful White children, and I can go to my deathbed confident that I didn’t spend my life in vain. Other than that, from a fundamentalist perspective, Heavenly Father purposefully created separate races and nations. It doesn’t make sense that people should undo all this and turn all of humanity into multicultural goulash.
Besides that, there are lots of other reasons not to mix it up!
I only wish my stupid brother and his bitch ex-wife had used their heads before a most sickening adoption after two White daughters and a vasectomy that enrages, haunts, and deeply depresses me to this day so I come on here daily for some kind of belonging/relatableness that helps in the meantime. Onwards we go…
If it’s of any comfort whatsoever, things could be so much worse. The look on the faces of those two White boys surrounded by the little tribe brought in from Sierra Leone says it all:
White Christian Couple Adopts Eight African Children At One Time | Return of Kings (theredarchive.com)
They are thinking my “fucking” parents are crazy! 🙃
“Michael, 16, Samuel, 15, Gabrielle, 12, Levi, 11, Malachi, nine, Judah, eight, Isaiah, seven and Zion, five”
Is it merely a cohencidence that all the black kids’ names are super Jewish?
I have to say one more thing; this is the end state of Christianity; this is the future; this is insanity to the 9th configuration! All in an effort to increase their “heavenly harvest!” I hope the author is right, I hope the big one ended up screwing his wife. If you haven’t looked at this article—please do! The “insult to injury” part is that this article was written by some freak out of India! 🙃
It would be interesting to see where these black adopted children wind up. Will they adjust to life in the U.S. or will they wind up in the criminal justice system?
The comments section on C-C is better than social media in my opinion. The discussions that we have on C-C, you can’t have on social media.
Thank you for taking part. Discussion threads are only as good as their participants.
John: August 21, 2025 If Christianity, if the Bible explicitly opposed miscegenation, which aligns with the Laws Of Nature, we would not have multiracial societies…it is factual that the Laws Of Nature oppose race mixing for the simple reason that it would lead to the extermination of biodiversity.
—
That is a ridiculously big IF, John. Christianity is anti-Nature.
I do not go on the social medium X, but a friend who does, sent me this:
This UK judge is a Jew. He ruled against the local govt that a hotel must continue to house invaders and at great risk and expense to the British people. Hopefully, things will realley kick off. https://x.com/vpopulimedia/status/1961425734200623607
“The insult to injury part is that this article was written by some freak out of India!”
That freak out of India (Roosh) was once upon a time a major figure in the Alt Right when it was in its salad days. Category: manosphere /pick up artist / egotist
Roosh was straight outta the Caucasus (Armenian-Persian) not Indian.
And what does that tell you about the Alt Right? 🙃
That every movement attracts its grifters.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.