Adapted from an address given on May 31, 2025, at a conference organized and hosted by James Edwards in Greenville, South Carolina.
***
Our host has brought us together this weekend to do more than diagnose and explain what’s gone wrong, or to call out those who are responsible.The focus of this conference, he explains, is “on how to effectively leverage the opportunities created by Donald Trump’s re-election,” and to “capitalize on the changing political climate.” Well, doing that demands an honest and realistic assessment of Trump’s career, the MAGA movement that grew from it, and the Trump presidency.
Donald Trump’s astonishing rise to power has been, above all, an expression of deep and growing unhappiness among Americans with what’s become of our country. The Trump-MAGA movement has given voice to the pent-up rage of millions – above all, white middle class and working Americans – who have been ignored and belittled by their political leaders, and who have been made to feel like strangers in their own country.
His success is the result of the mounting disappointment and anger at the ever more obvious failure of the establishment political parties and their leaders, who have held power for decades, and of those who have supported them in the mass media, in Hollywood, in business, and in school and college classrooms. Trump’s ascent to the White House is both a symptom and an accelerator of the breakdown of the liberal democratic order – and the ideology on which it is based – that has prevailed in our country and in western Europe since the end of World War II.
Trump has performed a great service by shaking things up. He has pushed Americans to acknowledge uncomfortable realities that those in power have wanted everyone to ignore. He has pressed Americans to re-consider such important issues as birthright citizenship, and “affirmative action” policies and other programs that discriminate against white citizens – issues that those in power had long regarded as “settled” and not open to question.
While acknowledging positive features of the Trump-MAGA movement, honesty compels us to also frankly acknowledge the very real limits of what that movement and the Trump administration can actually accomplish.
Donald Trump and MAGA movement leaders claim that America is no longer the great country it was and should be because it has been wrecked by evil people. To “Make America Great Again,” they believe, does not require a revolution. It requires only getting rid of those bad people who have done so much to wreck the country. In keeping with its character as a reactionary protest movement, Trump and MAGA Republicans focus on identifying their enemies and removing them from power and influence.
Trump and his colleagues and supporters are clear about who and what they do not like, and want to sweep away. They seem certain, for example, about what books they believe Americans should not read. Accordingly, the Trump administration has been busy removing from libraries books that foster anti-white attitudes, and notably those that promote “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.” However, Trump and the MAGA movement seem to have no idea of just what books should be in libraries, or that Americans should be reading.
That’s because Trump and the MAGA movement has no coherent, self-consistent worldview or historical outlook of its own to replace the ideology that has prevailed in the US for the past 80 years, and which has inexorably brought us to where we are today. As a result, the Trump-MAGA movement has no clear concept of the future other than a vague vision of an America that, once again, is “great” and “winning.”
So often we have heard Republican politicians and commentators tell us that the miserable conditions in US cities – the decay, crime and disorder of Detroit, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and so on – are all because … the mayors of those cities are Democrats. Do they – does anyone – actually believe such nonsense? So often MAGA Republicans tell us that the Democrats are the “real racists,” and insist that, “we” should all think of ourselves simply as human beings and “Americans” – and that our goal is, or should be, a color-blind, non-racial America.
MAGA Republicans complain about “identity politics,” calling it “divisive” and “racist.” It’s difficult to believe that those who make such claims are sincere, given that Trump’s own campaign routinely practiced “identity politics,” with election appeals to blacks, Hispanics, and Jews that promise benefits to members of those racial or ethnic groups.
As part of his effort to win support from black voters in the 2020 election campaign, Donald Trump issued his so-called “Platinum Plan,” which promised that a second Trump administration would make “Juneteenth” a national holiday, and would set up a range of new federal programs that, he claimed, would “increase access to capital in Black communities by almost 500 billion dollars,” thereby “creating 500,000 new black-owned businesses.” When President Biden later made Juneteenth an official federal holiday, Trump claimed credit for it because, he said, he was the one who made the idea “very famous.” During the 2024 presidential election cycle, both the Trump and Harris campaigns made “identity politics” appeals to Jews, running television ads that explained why each candidate was best for Jewish interests.
Although Trump and MAGA Republicans reject anti-white policies, and the outlook on which those polices are based, they do not have an explicitly pro-white outlook. Instead, they believe, or pretend to believe, that race does not matter – that America is so “exceptional” that this country is somehow immune from the realities of biology, of history, and of life itself.
Those who are serious about our country and our future, though, cannot afford to close their eyes to things as they really are. Work and sacrifice based on anything other than a frank and realistic understanding of the great challenges we face is a waste of time and effort. When we carefully consider just what can and should be done, we must be clear-eyed and honest about how profoundly the drastic racial-cultural transformation of our country over the past 80 years has changed everything. To be blunt, the Trump-MAGA diagnosis of what’s wrong with America, and therefore what’s to be done, is woefully inadequate.
In the years just after the end of World War II, the US population was some 90 percent European American. Whites were even a majority in every large US city. Today, only a handful of large US cities still have a majority white population. As everyone here is very aware, the US population is, or very soon will be, a majority non-white. MAGA Americans believe, or at least hope, that in spite of the radical cultural-racial change in the US population since the 1950s, President Trump will somehow restore the united, purposeful USA of a bygone era.
Some of us here this weekend are old enough to remember how many millions of white Americans and so-called conservatives put great hope in Ronald Reagan, another Republican leader whose slogan in the 1980 presidential election campaign was “Let’s Make America Great Again.” In his acceptance speech at the Republican Party national convention that year, Reagan spoke about welcoming Haitians to the US, because – he explained – America is a providentially chosen country for people everywhere who yearn for freedom. “Can we doubt,” he said, “that only a divine providence placed this land, this island of freedom, here as a refuge for all those people in the world who yearn to breath freely: Jews and Christians enduring persecution behind the Iron Curtain, the boat people of Southeast Asia, of Cuba and of Haiti, the victims of drought and famine in Africa, the freedom fighters of Afghanistan, and our own countrymen held in savage captivity.”
I remember the joy of victory shared by millions of white Americans when Reagan was elected president a few months later, and their happiness during the eight years he was in the White House – lifting spirits with inspiring, patriotic rhetoric about American greatness and exceptionalism. Like Trump, Ronald Reagan ignored race – and, not surprisingly, the country’s demographic and cultural de-Europeanization continued during the Reagan years at a brisk pace.
However thrilling election victories by politicians who promise a “great America” may make many of us feel, that is not what really matters. What’s important is not victory for a candidate or a party, but solid, purposeful policies for our people based on a coherent worldview grounded in reality.
During the 2024 election campaign, many MAGA voters were encouraged by the prospect that a second Trump administration would deport one or two or even ten million illegal immigrants. Most Trump supporters today still hope that sweeping policies and measures by the new administration might somehow turn back the clock, and restore an America that once was. The sober truth, though, is that even if all illegal immigration to the US stops tomorrow, and every illegal immigrant is deported or leaves the country, the racial “third-worldization” of the US – the de-Europeanization of the country – will continue, even if at a slower pace.
In his inaugural address in January, and in similar remarks on election night in November, Trump made a point of expressing thanks for the support he had gotten from “African Americans, Hispanic Americans, [and] Asian Americans.” He made no mention of the much more important, indeed, decisive support he received from white Americans. The reason for this “oversight,” if you will, is not ignorance.
To talk explicitly about white American voters, or white American heritage, or white American history, is somehow to detract from the comfortable but delusional assumption of so many of our people that white America is America, and that blacks, Hispanics, and so forth, are more or less adjunct or peripheral population groups that “we” should either ignore or try to uplift and fit in to “our” great country.
Until the middle of the twentieth century, nearly all Americans understood and acknowledged the obvious reality that race matters. Today that’s no longer true. For more than 80 years, white Americans have been subjected to a systematic, organized campaign of social conditioning that promotes a poisonously distorted portrayal of life and history, through television and Hollywood movies, in newspapers and magazines, and in school and college classrooms, all bolstered with reassuring but toxic platitudes by compliant politicians. This well-organized campaign has succeeded in persuading most white Americans – including millions of MAGA-Trump supporters – that race does not or should not matter.
In his inaugural address of January, Donald Trump promised, “America will soon be greater, stronger, and far more exceptional than ever before.” His administration, he said, will “bring back hope, prosperity, safety, and peace for citizens of every race, religion, color and creed.” He promised not only that “we will bring prices down,” but that “the American Dream will soon be back and thriving like never before.” If Trump’s vision of the future is valid, then we – that is, all those who understand that race is not merely a social construct – have been wrong.
It’s possible to ignore reality – but it is not possible to ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. What that means is that the real-life consequences of what the US has become – racially, culturally and socially – impose unequivocal limits on the actual, lasting achievements of a Trump government. Within ten years, and most likely before the end of this second Trump administration, it will be obvious, even to most of his supporters, that the MAGA vision of a “Golden Age” for America is delusional.
In coming years, demographic reality will dispel what’s left of the naïve hopes of a Trumpian restoration, and the foolish view that the realities of biology, history, and life can be ignored. The consequences of this process will also inevitably force a shift in attitudes by white Americans about themselves and their country, especially among younger men and women who have no memory of a time when the US was still an overwhelmingly white nation.
As white Americans become an ever smaller part of the US population, our people will be increasingly forced to acknowledge their declining influence and status, and will be compelled to face the consequences of living as a dwindling minority in the country that was once theirs. Only then will large numbers of white Americans begin to organize in earnest to battle for the rights and interests of our people.
A great change in attitudes among white Americans is coming. As history shows, such a change can happen quickly when the new outlook is in line with sensibilities that already exist, but which have been dormant and unexpressed. Where conditions like those in today’s America existed in the past, similar shifts have taken place quickly.
The history of our own country provides an instructive example. When prominent Americans from the 13 colonies met together in late 1774 as the “Continental Congress,” they still regarded themselves as loyal to Britain and the English king. Their identity was still first and foremost that of British subjects. At that time, George Washington – a delegate at that assembly – was “well satisfied’ that independence from Britain was not “desired by any thinking man in all North America.” As late as July 1775, that is, even after the bloody clashes between colonial militiamen and British soldiers in Massachusetts at Lexington and Concord, as well as at Bunker Hill near Boston, the Continental Congress denied “any designs of separation from Great Britian and establishing independent states.”
But attitudes about identify were changing. By the summer of 1776, a view that just a year earlier had been considered unthinkable was now acceptable, at least to a determined minority of white Americans. In July 1776, the Continental Congress delegates ratified and signed the Declaration of Independence, and thereby proclaimed a new identity for the white people of the former 13 colonies. It was only after five years of suffering and privation in a bloody struggle that often seemed hopeless, and in which support from a foreign country proved decisive, that British military power was broken, thereby securing the future of the new republic.
More importantly, all those who signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776, or who debated and signed the US Constitution of 1787, unanimously regarded the new country as a white people’s republic. This new identity took hold quickly because it fit well with changed conditions, and because it expressed a latent but suppressed sensibility.
In spite of decades of egalitarian propaganda and social conditioning, most white Americans today still have an instinctive sense of “whiteness.” On a certain level, most white Americans already realize, however unclearly, that there is no secure and hopeful future for themselves and their children and grand-children in a non-white, Third-world society. That dim awareness is manifest in how we live and act. For decades, white Americans have shown in their behavior that they prefer to live among, and associate with, people who are like themselves. Even those who claim to love “diversity” move away from neighborhoods that become too non-white.
All the same, most white Americans today are still loyal to the USA, and hope that somehow this increasingly diverse and divided entity can still be held together. For most of our people, a future without the USA is simply unimaginable. That’s understandable, of course. After all, for most of the nearly 250 years that the US has existed, this country’s saga has been a historically unparalleled one of prosperity, innovation, expansion, hegemony, and success.
For reasons already mentioned, only a minority of white Americans today are more concerned about the future of our people than they are about the future of the United States. Because most white Americans today more or less accept that forthrightly affirming our heritage and identity is somehow shameful or embarrassing, they are not yet ready to support candidates who openly defend White interests. As a result, not a single openly, unapologetically pro-white public figure holds elected office right now – at least on the federal level – anywhere in the country.
When we give serious consideration to just what can or should be done in political life, obviously we must take into consideration the actual feelings and attitudes of white voters. The confusion of most white Americans about what it even means to be “American,” together with their ambivalent feelings about race and identity, impose constraints on just what is possible, and not possible, for pro-white candidates. For the foreseeable future, pro-white candidates must be careful about how they express themselves, making sure not to be so explicit that they alarm voters who are afraid of “racism,” but not so timid that they betray our communitarian interests. All the same, the election record of the Trump-MAGA movement shows that millions of white Americans will vote for candidates who openly reject anti-white egalitarian policies, and thereby defend, at least implicitly, white community interests.
As the demographic trends of the past half-century continue, and as ever more white Americans better understand the consequences of those trends, they will be steadily more willing to support candidates who appeal for votes with a white version of “identity politics.” Ever more white voters will be motivated to support candidates who not only highlight and call out the deceit and hypocrisy of the politicians, educators, media masters, and business leaders promoting DEI, “affirmative action” and similar policies, but who also explain just how such policies, and the outlook behind them, harm the interests and future of white Americans.
The outreach of pro-white candidates should be cogent and reasonable, and appeal to a sense of justice and fair play. Such candidates will be all the more effective when they appeal to voters not merely with negative messaging about their opponents, but when they also present positive imagery of our own people, and messaging that inspires hope for a better future for our children. Successful pro-white candidates and activists must learn to be flexible and adaptive in tactics, while always firm and steadfast in principle. That’s not easy to do. It requires patience, self-control, and discernment – virtues that normally come only with experience and age.
In this time of accelerating change and looming challenge, our most pressing task must be to awaken the suppressed but slumbering self-awareness, confidence, and latent strength of our people. Our hopes and efforts must be directed, first and foremost, not to propping up and trying to save the multi-cultural, multi-racial USA. Instead, our focus should be on the well-being and future of our people. In this struggle there will be no easy, “quick fix” victory. In fact, the battle will become more intense after Trump is gone, and the MAGA movement is history.
Happily, there are already encouraging reasons for hope and confidence.
On the intellectual front, we are already prevailing, even if that’s not yet widely understood or acknowledged. Our most formidable adversaries in the battle for ideas are not neo-Marxists or dreamy utopians, but rather the neo-conservative and neo-liberal apologists for the prevailing democratic-capitalist order. Although they defend a System that is still powerful and entrenched, they are very much on the defensive because that order is ever more obviously failing.
These defenders of what they call “democracy” want to suppress and ban popular political parties that they say are not “really” democratic. These champions of “free speech” and “tolerance” ban books, websites, and podcasts that they regard as offensive or hateful. They denounce ethno-nationalism in Hungary and Poland, but defend it in Israel. Their slogans, arguments and ideas are lackluster and uninteresting. No wonder they are increasingly regarded – especially by younger men and women – as ineffectual hypocrites.
In this struggle, we can also take heart from the important work that’s being done to lay a foundation for ultimate victory. Especially encouraging is the rise in recent years of an ever-growing number of capable, smart, and articulate younger white activists, publicists, writers, and organizer. With each passing year, these younger men and women – in our country and overseas – are turning out ever more, and ever better quality, videos, podcasts, websites, essays and books.
In this great, existential struggle of our age, our guiding spirit must not be loathing or hatred of others, but an abiding loyalty, love and devotion for the heritage and future of our own people, sustained by our vision of a secure, hopeful and durable future for our children and for generations of our people not yet born.

24 comments
“Trump made a point of expressing thanks for the support he had gotten from ‘African Americans, Hispanic Americans, [and] Asian Americans.’ He made no mention of the much more important, indeed, decisive support he received from white Americans.”
Indeed whites were the only race that, on balance, voted for Trump. All the peoples he thanked voted against him. No thanks for the one people who actually got him into office.
Overall, this was a well-written and inspiring speech, but we must not assume victory is inevitable. There’s no guarantee whites will wake up. Even South Africa is full of silly leftist egalitarian whites. There’s no guarantee we can break through the propaganda. There’s no guarantee that, as an aging and dwindling minority, we won’t simply be crushed by force. We must remain vigilant, and always work to strengthen our position and carry ourselves towards a better future. No one should assume that someone else will do the work. That way lies death.
I completely agree with what you say. Let’s rejoice in our victories, but let’s not rest on our laurels. Let’s never offer the easy way out, but hard, demanding work to the whites who want to join our cause; for it’s from quality that quantity comes. And let’s remember that everything that is beautiful, great, noble and strong has a beneficial effect over the very long term. It was the sharp intellectual arguments of the white nationalists that convinced me, and nothing else. Systematically prefer the greatness that immortalizes the hero to ephemeral happiness.
Speaking of Ronald Reagan, I remember the strong impression made on me by an extract from his famous speech on “The Evil Empire”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_Empire_speech
As a schoolboy, I had read this extract in a French history textbook (a history textbook for teenagers aged 13-14), which we used as an auxiliary for our lesson on the Cold War. It was the first time in my life that I had read a politician speak with such sincerity and eloquence. All Ronald Reagan’s speeches are available on the Youtube channel of the Reagan Institute and Foundation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXBswFfh6AY&list=PL5ECD54EC3883CF4D
Here are a few videos of his presidential victories in 1980 and 1984. Of course the audience is 99 percent white.
1980: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYESE18B60M
1984: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6Ogyi3Z0KE
“[w]hen they also present positive imagery of our own people, and messaging that inspires hope for a better future for our children.”
This is the key message.
Excellent speech by Mark Weber.
Great article and a pleasant surprise to read Mark Weber here. I share his optimism that at some point our people will wake up and realize what’s been done to them. It’s up to our generation to lay the groundwork and explain how the country has been usurped by people who don’t have their best interests in mind.
Yes sir. At some point, we must have conversations with our family and maybe friends who are MAGA. That is, they just don’t understand that the destruction of America is founded upon the destruction of our race. If you feel your family in that camp is ready for those conversations, then find a good way of having them. If not, find a subtle but good way to prep them for it and do it when properly prepared.
I had the conversation with my family. Part One was just a powerpoint and discussion with slide after slide after slide of screenshots anti-White, genocidal quotes embedded in the most powerful institutions. That was coupled with the sobering, “We aren’t going to get our guns and have a civil war”, reality check. Part Two was an inspiring powerpoint with imagery and anecdotes about the achievements of our ancestors from antiquity until the moon landing. That was accompanied with a tie-in to our specific ancestry and their journey in Iberia from the Gates of Toledo to the Reconquista.
The rest is a slog of helping to acculturate, them and the children and to recreate the ties that have been severed or that were dissolved and never formed. It is a daily process. Show up for you youngsters and help them make Leonidas and Hera hand made Halloween costumes. Show them part one of Netflix Barbarien and teach them that Arminius was their ancestor. Do not show them the black girl-boss Season 2. Unless, they are ready to be taught about White erasure, cultural genocide and how and why they are attacked and dispossessed. There is a time for that.
They must learn what was taken from them, and they must burn with a desire to rebuild and someday take it back. It starts with family and friends who are primed, not ready, but primed for the difficult discussions of sobering reality. Don’t leave it to chance.
Great way to go about things. I myself am not shy about playing Counter-Currents, AmRen or Red Ice podcasts within earshot of anyone, especially the young and impressionable.
The Trevor Lynch books especially, and the essays on video games, Breakfast Club, analog cameras, and sports/muscle cars being kinda fashy and proWhite cool can pique their interest as well more than the pure political.
Well done, talking about these topics offline is difficult, especially with those you love, but good things can come of it if it’s done in a calm, reasoned manner. For me, one of the hardest parts is being patient. Very few people are going to become nationalists in the course of a single conversation. We just have to hope that something we say will stick with them, and that they’ll be inspired to look into it themselves.
It sounds to me like you are going about it in a very intelligent way. Very few tasks are more important than ensuring that White children have a healthy consciousness of their heritage and are able to see through any attempts to make them feel guilty or ashamed of it.
It is tough when you aren’t the parent. In my case the parents get it and accept the macro level facts. However, they love Disney and football. It is a tough dance to find a way to tell them that it is poison they should give it up. At some point all you can do is hope that the other things you do overpower the spirit sickening environment and that they have taken hold as we progress through the darker days ahead.
Like most Whites, they are alarmed by the tranny stuff so that is a good deterrent, and they get and accept the anti-White substrata. However, they still feel very uncomfortable leaving the colorblind, civic-nationalism must be tried harder conditioning. They do not understand it is nothing but an execution chamber holding cell. They won’t give up Disney and football. Behavior changes are a choice that one must feel compelled to make oneself. Only those that fully grasp the sinister ends of the project feel so compelled.
I think the work there is to focus on positive identity. The system’s conditioning makes their minds leap from thinking of race and being White with a White group self interest to that meaning they are hating everyone else. The conditioned social stigma against White Identity is very strong and even constrains very spiritually healthy people.
So I just focus on positive identity. Christmas consists of healthy toy gifts and fun goodies to scratch that itch accompanied by a 12″+ statue of a Western hero or mythological figure for the kids and a Western themed annual fridge calendar so they see healthy images every single day. We are building up quite a living room mantle with a collection of these statues that I get from Medieval Collections. The next addition will be framed summations of each figure. I plan to do the research with the kids to have them help me do one so they participate and make connections. To combat Disney and sports I get the littlest ones to watch a live performance (on YouTube), of a master playing Bach or Mozart …. It is cool because the kids love it and they actually understand the technical brilliance and make the connection between our high art music and the slop they listen to elsewhere.
The adults get a goody and an annual set of goods from pro-White companies like Above Time coffee and Freija’s Majick. Those products are high quality and hopefully become a regular purchase.
It is little stuff. I am open to ideas from others who are seeing what works and what doesn’t. We do what we can, and hope it is enough.
You’re doing good work by instilling in your kids a positive racial identity. Spencer Quinn wrote an essay on the subject five years ago. His advice makes a lot of sense.
https://counter-currents.com/2020/01/red-pilling-our-children/
I’m a younger guy (early 20s) and don’t have any kids yet, but I hope to. I do not look forward to having to worry about all of the enemy propaganda and lies they will be exposed to, and how to combat it. But its something that must be done.
However, they still feel very uncomfortable leaving the colorblind, civic-nationalism must be tried harder conditioning. Then ask them why they live in a White majority neighborhood where diversity isn’t before they respond with NAXALT and remind you of the ethiopian restaurant, the nice Amazon delivery guy, and candace owens to disprove us “racists”, and more importantly why millionaire athletes-all of them-live in the Whitest areas and keep a social distance of at least six miles from the black concoonery.
One bit of advice I gave to a seven-year-old is that some teachers won’t have his best interests in mind. The bad ones include those who try to make them think they’re something they’re not, or try to make them feel guilty about things they didn’t do.
Dave, you mentioned the S. Quinn’s redpilling our children article below. I just read that one ( & its associated comment section) as well as another related essay All for a Prom Date https://counter-currents.com/2017/05/all-for-a-prom-date/ & its comment section.
All I can say is thank God for my ability to eavesdrop on conversations between race-realist White men (when working a coffee counter at a diner at age 16, when trimming hair at a barber shop, and now while perusing comments here at C-C.)
Sometimes I feel like I grew up in Crazytown.
I hope you’re joking about PowerPoint.
I’m not joking about it. I am not joking about this either. The remaining elder in the family was present. The Part One was nothing but quote after quote after quote after quote with screenshots of the source or of a video capture of explicit statements of intent to kill, replace and genocide Whites from every last leading Western institution. The Boomer had a question, “What are your sources?”
We can’t save everyone. In fact, we can’t save anyone. We can only share the information and see who wants to save themselves.
I agree more or less. It’s just comical that WN can be so “White Collar”. Hopefully you provided coffee and donuts.
Terrific speech by Mr. Weber, he lays out the problem perfectly. Conservatism of the Trump variety can serve as a bridge to explicit racialism, but by itself it is nothing more than a suicide cult for Whites.
This excellent speech suggests Dr. Pierce’s lasting influence on Mark from when he worked for him as a young man in the 1970s.
Mark Weber: Work and sacrifice based on anything other than a frank and realistic understanding of the great challenges we face is a waste of time and effort…
What’s important is not victory for a candidate or a party, but solid, purposeful policies for our people based on a coherent worldview grounded in reality…
Numerous Pierce-like quotes in this speech. Those are just a couple.
Will Williams said yesterday: This excellent speech suggests Dr. Pierce’s lasting influence on Mark from when he worked for him as a young man in the 1970s…
A reminder of this little-known fact that I posted in a comment under Wolf Stoner’s essay “The State vs. the Nation” here at C-C, back on 22 February:
Some youngsters at C-C who follow podcasts may be familiar with one of the best weekly ones, Weekly Roundup — with Fróði Midjord & Mark Weber | Guide to Kulchur hosted by Fróði Midjord and Mark Weber. You may know that Weber is the long-time director of the revisionist organization, IHR (Institute of Historical Review}. What you may not know is this, from WikiJews, about the author of this piece 47 years ago about Solzhenitsyn and the importance of truth in our cause:
…Beginning in 1978 Weber became involved with the National Alliance, a far-right white supremacist organization. In 1979 Weber served as the editor of the group’s magazine, the National Vanguard. Throughout the 1980s Weber functioned as the treasurer of the National Alliance’s Cosmotheist Church…
We do not have to look very far into the future to imagine what Mr. Trump’s — the so-called “Peace President’s” — act of war last week for Jewry/Israel against the sovereign nation of Iran, can bring about in retribution.
ALMOST 20 YEARS AGO Ron Paul said, referring to earlier wars for Israel in the Middle East, “We bomb them endlessly and then wonder why they are mad at us.” This is so basic and obvious — yet many Americans, wrapped up in Christian (imagined) righteousness, and worship of their own worst enemies (the Jewish power structure) — can’t see it.
I’m an American. And in the last few days I’ve had a few friends and family members who are legitimately concerned that we could be in danger now. That is, it has finally occurred to them to ask the question, “What if we get bombed?” (After all, Iran has a lot — a lot — of White genes in their genetic background, and they also have the real competence with science and weapons that goes with those genes.) So my friends and family are starting to feel just a tiny bit of fear.
And all I can think is that entire generations in the Middle East have grown up with this fear — multiplied by ten thousand — as a permanent part of their lives. They never knew a time, in a dozen countries, in which they didn’t have to wonder “what if we get bombed?”
What do you think that does to a culture? To a people? To family teachings and traditions? What do you think that does to their view of Israel — and the West and the US that always seem to do Israel’s bidding and regard Israel’s adversaries as subhuman, worthy of death on almost any pretext? After 50 years of that — for most, an entire lifetime — how could these people not think that the US deserved to be destroyed? What else do they even know?
None of this is confusing. These are the stupidly obvious and self evident results of what we have done. Done as slavish servants of the organized Jews.
Let me explain what I think is happening and why siding with Israel is a horrible course of action that will be utterly devastating for us and for most other nations, too. My reasoning is based on obvious, known facts — but these are facts that are openly avoided, downplayed, and suppressed in the Jewish-run US media…
Read the rest of this thought provoking essay, put up here a couple of days ago as “Time to Bomb Country X” at nationalvanguard.org
Ladies and gentlemen, what do you think about the prospect of a third party in America?
In my opinion, if it is intended to be an “actual Republican” party, that would become a spoiler for the existing Republicans, ensuring the daemon rats dictatorship before there comes any actual possibility of the system’s demise. And, if it’s designed as a “sensible centrist” entity, how could it help to bring down the regime?
A person like Musk can create more than one party, of course, e.g. “real Republicans” and “real Democrats”, but I don’t know how it could help the situation.
Anyway, you should understand the American realities better than me.
And who is going to continue Trump’s job?
White Americans are caught up in a sunk cost fallacy brought about by loss aversion. ‘America’ is a failed investment for White people. It cannot be saved by giving more or doing more. The jewish and anti-White ruling class are happy with the results (because their wealth and privilege insulate them from the adverse consequences). The more resources White North Americans put into saving ‘America’ (or ‘Canada’ for that matter), the fewer resources are available for the survival and thriving of White North Americans.
But I don’t think traditional ‘politics’ is quite the right investment vehicle either. Whites need an investment that cannot be derailed by the institutional control possessed by the jews and White anti-Whites. And that’s not ‘politics’ in a media-saturated ‘democracy’ where the media is entirely hostile to White interests.
A better investment is the White people you see every day. Start by simply being more friendly to Whites, kinder. Whites caring about Whites because they are White (and no other reason) is not something our enemies can stop without making it obvious that they are doing it solely because of their hatred of Whites.
The religion of White people needs to be caring about White people because they are White. You can follow this religion every day. All it asks is that you act out your caring on actual White people who you see and meet.
Things are not as they appear in Jew-controlled media: Alternative media say:
Pentagon official axed after calling Israel ‘death cult’, highlighting growing US dissent
TEHRAN – The Pentagon has removed Colonel Nathan McCormack from his sensitive advisory role after his scathing criticism of the Israeli regime, including labeling it a “death cult”
…In April 2024, Colonel McCormack questioned the fundamental nature of the U.S.-Israel relationship, posting, “I’ve lately been considering whether we might be Israel’s proxy and not realized it yet”, adding, “Our worst ‘ally’.
We get literally nothing out of the ‘partnership’ other than the enmity of millions of people in the Middle East [West Asia], Africa and Asia”.
By May, he said “Netanyahu and his Judeo-supremacist cronies” have prolonged conflict for their own political or territorial goals…”
Source: Pentagon official axed after calling Israel ‘death cult,’ highlighting growing US dissent – Tehran Times
* * * * *
Netanyahu to visit White House amid pressure for Gaza ceasefire
“…As Gaza endures relentless and devastating massacres, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to visit Washington early next week for talks with US President Donald Trump, The Times of Israel reported, citing a White House official.
The visit comes amid claims that Washington is intensifying its efforts to end the war on Gaza and secure the release of Israeli captives. However, it is important to note that the US remains complicit in “Israel’s” ongoing aggression for over 600 days, providing military funding, arms, and consistently vetoing ceasefire resolutions at the United Nations.
The July 7 visit will mark Netanyahu’s third meeting with Trump since the latter returned to office in January 2025. It follows a 12-day joint US-Israeli aggression on the Islamic Republic of Iran, during which Iran emerged victorious, forcing “Israel” and the United States to scramble for a ceasefire, namely after its strike on the US base in Qatar on June 23…”
Source: Netanyahu to visit White House amid pressure for Gaza ceasefire | Al Mayadeen English
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.