All for a Prom DateSpencer J. Quinn
I’m sure this was a painful read for many on the Alt Right. It was for me, anyway. The story, a familiar one, can be distilled into four basic parts.
Part One: Father warns daughter not to date black guys or he will cut her off.
Part Two: Daughter takes a black guy to the prom.
Part Three: Father not only cuts her off financially, but texts her an irreversibly abusive rant spiked with numerous F-bombs and N-bombs.
Part Four: Daughter posts father’s vitriol on social media and virtue signals to the world how wonderful she is and how horrible her racist father is.
Of course, the father’s proscription against his daughter dating black guys is correct, both from a racial identity standpoint which defends the propagation of whites as a race, and from a race realist standpoint which protects individuals against the more dangerous aspects of certain non-whites. As a fellow dad, my heart also leaps for the father, fearing that one day, God forbid, I might be in his shoes. Regardless of this – and with the caveat that we really don’t know the whole story behind this sordid reality show – I would still have a very hard time standing by the father in any public forum.
I hate to say it, but despite being right, he is the villain here. Here is a snippet of what he wrote his daughter after being informed of her swarthy suitor:
Shut the f*** up you have no right to talk to me anymore. Go live with the F***IN n*****s. Your pictures are already off my walls. You can go to hell. What the f*** is wrong with you? . . . You want to mingle with Subhumans I’ll treat you accordingly.
You could practically hear the bleeps just by reading it. And it’s all because of one prom date.
My revulsion for the father’s actions exists on many levels, and I don’t think I need to enumerate them here. My sympathy for him goes nearly as deep, however, which is probably why this story put such a thumbprint on me. When I step back and ponder all this, I begin to envy some of the leaders on the Alt Right who either haven’t yet had children or never plan to. Going childless does allow a certain freedom which being rooted to a spouse and children (especially young children) makes tricky, to say the least. And when helming a dissident and somewhat dangerous political movement which calls for a radical change in the present status quo, freedom is certainly a good thing.
Of course, so is having children, the corny-yet-true reasons which also need not be enumerated here. But I am quite sure that those of us who have children, especially daughters, have often wondered how they would react to such a mudsharking scenario – not so much to a poor choice of prom date but to the prospect of having kinky-haired, mocha-brown grandchildren and a daughter or son foolish enough to flout the reality of race along with crime statistics and common sense. This is almost as high on the dread-o-meter as hearing about your child getting in an auto accident or coming down with an incurable disease. This is something you can only Hope Never Happens.
I wish I could offer a way to make sure it never happens, but nothing I can offer can withstand bad luck or fools. Leaving aside children who are mentally ill or unstable, my guess is that simplified yet honest explanations of race realism to children as young as third- or fourth-graders could do a world of good. Don’t be ugly about it, like Archie F-Bomb Bunker above. Don’t appear wishy-washy, either. Most importantly, don’t harp on it all the time or you’ll come across like a one-note blowhard even to your kids. The truth often gets drowned out by snores when you bore your audience.
What complicates matters, however, is that children are often natural rebels. When my oldest son was four, he decided he wanted to see how far Daddy’s authority reached. He knew he wasn’t supposed to eat in the family room, but he took his little peanut butter sandwich cracker into it, anyway. I told him numerous times not to do that. He looked at me defiantly with peanut butter smeared all over his face and placed one foot on the carpet.
Well, of course, within two seconds I snatched him up, took away his cracker, and spanked him. I can assure you he never did that again. Despite this story’s happy ending, however, it does illustrate the dilemma that I am sure most parents face every day. Come down too hard on your kids, and they’ll hate you and want to rebel. Don’t come down on them at all, and you may end up with a daughter like this girl, who was shocked and dismayed that her parents would react so negatively to her new black boyfriend. She had no idea, you see, that her parents would disapprove of such a thing.
The only way to thread this devilishly slender needle, I would think, is to invest the time to get to know your kid and then take it from there. Not much for a pearl of wisdom, but there it is.
As for “The Talk,” we all know about the Derb’s. Of course, it’s excellent. But it is aimed more for purple-pilled, sophisticated young adults who need some guidance making their way in the world. What we’re talking about here are the dangers of miscegenation, especially white-on-black miscegenation. How do we, as parents, get this message through to kids who are being indoctrinated in negrophilia by our popular culture and public schools before they even know about sex?
First, I would always stress the “otherness” of other races. This is something I’ve noticed older generations doing all the time when I was growing up. He’s not just “that guy” over there; he’s “that black guy.” It’s not “the laundromat down the street”; it’s “the Chinese laundromat down the street.” If a person was not white, then his race instantly became his dominating characteristic. This wasn’t mean-spirited or denigrating. It was just how people talked back then. In my parents’ generation, non-whites were unusual because of their race, so it made sense to identify them as such. Exceptions were made, of course, for non-whites we got to know. But there were so few of them that such exceptions were miniscule.
Today, of course, children are taught to ignore race entirely unless mentioning it will make non-whites appear virtuous or whites appear non-virtuous. This is an attempt to turn the tables on whites and “otherize” them. This is also the first step towards anti-white racism: when children become comfortable bringing up whiteness in exclusively negative contexts, it’s not too much of a leap from there to insist that whites should have no racial interests at all.
So, I think white parents should go back to otherizing the other. Do it casually, do it nicely, but do it. And often.
Second, be informed. White parents should not only be aware of the level of revisionism being taught in their children’s schools, but they should also keep information at hand to refute it. With all the brainwashing going on these days, relying on folk wisdom or anecdotal evidence to shake a white child out of hating his ancestors isn’t going to cut it. It’s sad to have to say this, but all race-conscious white parents today should have at least a basic statistical understanding of such topics as:
- Black-white educational and testing gaps
- Black crime and illegitimacy rates
- Anti-white hatred and violence among blacks
- Black unemployment rates
- Wife/girlfriend/child battery in black households
- Drug abuse among blacks
- Divorce and infidelity among black-white couples
- Poverty in black societies, both foreign and domestic, and both current and historic
- Corruption in black-run municipalities
- Regression toward the mean
This by no means is an exhaustive list, and it can be pared down or spruced up depending on the age and intelligence of the child. In any case, the message should be clear: stay away from black people or refute my numbers. Pick one.
Third, follow Newton’s Law of the same number by making the reaction equal and opposite to the action. In the above example, the race realist father flew into raging berserker mode over a single prom date. If that’s all there was to it (and I have no way of knowing if it is), then that’s just plain stupid. Black-white hand holding and puppy love should be strongly discouraged, yes, but the greater concern centers not so much on what it is but for what it could lead to: miscegenation and the erosion of our overall genetic potential and racial strength. That is what we should be fighting most strenuously against, not prom dates. For example, suppose that instead of one’s eighteen-year-old daughter finding a black paramour, it’s one’s slightly nutty sixty-eight-year-old spinster aunt. Bad, sure, but not the end of the world as in the former instance, since children are not going to be part of the equation.
And while we’re talking of children, this says nothing of the antipathy and resentment that our half-black or quarter-black progeny have shown us over the past two centuries and still carry today. Brief biographies of historical figures such as Frederick Douglass, W. E. B. Du Bois, Malcolm X, and contemporary ones such as Barack Obama and his Mulatto Mafia should prove this point well enough.
We should also remember that kids make mistakes and go through phases. If a teenage daughter insists on taking a black guy to the prom, don’t let her go to the prom, revoke some of her privileges, ground her if necessary. But don’t tell her to FOAD as you give her and her belongings a swift kick out of the house. It’s only a prom date, after all. There is a decent chance she’ll mature and see the error of her ways in a few years. Which one of us never did stupid or foolish things when we were young? And who ends up marrying and having kids with their prom dates, anyway?
And another thing: for God’s sake, please, we should keep our profanity-laden race rants to ourselves. Again, the reasons for this are obvious, so I don’t need to enumerate them here. One slightly less than obvious one, however, is quite selfish: people like the raging dad monster above make the rest of us look bad. Impressionable kids like his daughter and her bevy of Facebook friends will liken all race-realists, Alt Right figures, and White Nationalists to people like that: vulgar, spiteful men with poor impulse control. So will cynical liberals and Leftists who know a political opportunity when they see one. The vast majority of us are not at all like that, of course. But thanks to the charming gentleman above, we have one more bad image to live down.
Finally, we should make the consequences clear. From an early age, our children should know that dating blacks will be strongly discouraged. Sexual activity with them will be outright forbidden. Marriage and children with them will result in the complete destruction of the family.
As painful and as awful as that would be, we should tell them that this not a threat. It’s a promise.
George Friedman’s The Next 100 Years
The Psychology of the Politically Correct
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin: Prophet of Eugenics and Race-Realism
Confessions of a White Democrat
Race & the Bible
A Southerner Comes Home: My Escape from New York
Kathleen Casillo Did Nothing Wrong
. . . but What If She Did?
Readings on Race Realism
Race mixing by young whites, especially with blacks, destroys white families. With old people past child bearing age, it’s not such a big deal. But with young people, IT’S DEVASTATING to the WHITE family. I’ve been at family gatherings (not mine) where everyone holds their breath because a mudsharking daughter, grand daughter, niece or cousin produced a mixed race offspring that will be around forever. You can’t speak freely about anything. It astonishes me how many subjects are suddenly off limits when this tragedy happens. Politics. History. Current events. Family history. The only thing subject to free speech is sports, and that’s because Negros are sports icons. The ever present wet blanket of “white guilt” is always there, just below the surface. I hate seeing WHITE people look nervously around and lower their voices before speaking. Like being inmates in our own homes.
So sad, so true!
A much appreciated article about a vexing subject. Very good ideas to cut out the swears, and imitate our grandparents by casually “othering” non-whites
I also think good race-realist praxis could include “strategic exposure” around age 8 or 9: when a child has a strong enough ego to know where they are and aren’t comfortable, but only a very fuzzy sense of politics. Going as a family and/or with a church group to an urban soup kitchen, domestic violence center or even to hand out sandwiches to homeless blacks in a park are excellent ways to bring your children face-to-face with racial differences and hierarchy, and to lay the groundwork for future conversations.
I suppose something was wrong with their relationship anyway…
An acquaintance of mine who shares our racial nationalist beliefs was devastated when his daughter not only dated an American of mixed race but set up home with him in Ireland. Naturally, the situation provoked the deepest heart-searching and it was immediately apparent to him that only absolute honesty both with his daughter and himself would solve the problem and win the day.
Firstly, knowing his daughter to be both intelligent and of impeccable honesty. He knew she would never have defied his wishes over a Coloured man if the man concerned had been entirely without merit. He could understand her motivation however much he might disagree with it. Any blind and unreasonable response would have surely driven an insuperable barrier between them. Likewise, any compromise of principle would only have weakened his daughter’s respect for his integrity and character.
Racism is not founded on prejudice or a shallow emotional reaction against the unfamiliar, but on the knowledge that as individuals we’re only a minute chapter in life’s ongoing evolution. We hold our culture and our gene pool, from which it springs, in trust for the next generation.
Ultimately, his daughter understood, respected this and fortunately things resolved themselves before any real damage was done.
I completely understand why the dad went ballistic over his daughter’s behavior, although it doesn’t seem to matter whether dads, in general, react with anger or acceptance; to the dad’s credit, his external behavior is, at least, aligned with his actual feelings, which is more than I can say for those who bury their true thoughts behind fake smiles and blinking eyes. A few days ago, an older colleague at work was talking excitedly about his twenty-something year old daughter’s expected engagement to a South Indian, expressing his frustration that the engagement had not yet taken place; I had to wonder whether the frustration being expressed wasn’t really a sublimation of feelings about the engagement itself. The root cause of such insolent behavior in young adults, is probably, in most cases, poor parenting and an inconsistent or ill-conceived incentive structure. Cutting off college, cell phone and insurance payments, etc is probably too little too late, but I have to applaud the underlying attempt to enforce the correct behavior.
Sotto voce beats trashy, profanity-laced rants every single time.
I’m not going to click on the links, because I don’t want to contribute to the propagation of this story, but I have to imagine that this man isn’t exactly the sharpest tool in the shed. For those of us who are a little more bright, I’d say that bringing our daughter (or son – men who miscegenate are just as culpable as women who do so!) into the den and explaining – with gentle but deadly seriousness – how devastating interracial “relationships” can be both for the family and for the miscegenator is the best approach. Shouting “fuck you!!” and using the word “nigger” only weakens the point being made, and while ethnonationalism and racial identity are certainly ideals soaked with emotion, they must also be bolstered with reason.
Of course, prophylaxis is the best medicine. Parents need to track their kids’ experiences in school and make sure that cultural Marxist propaganda is swiftly treated (think the father-to-son dinner discussions in American History X).
” I would still have a very hard time standing by the father in any public forum.”
In which case the anti-Whites win again. Including his daughter who was more interested in her virtue-signaling than in respecting her heritage and her father’s wishes. Either we hang together or we shall surely hang separately(H/T Ben Franklin). Which I’m sure the White South Africans could attest to. Stand together under any and all circumstances. Just like the Colored peoples do. Stand together in spite of “bad” words or even violent acts. That’s how THEY win. Our willingness to pick and choose only hurts us. I’ve gotten to the point where these things no longer matter. White Unity uber alles. Nothing above the race. Nothing outside the race. Nothing against the race. All for the race. Easier said than done obviously. But it STILL has to be done. No more cringing. Somebody shoots their arm out and screams HAIL VICTORY and we all scurry away like cockroaches. While the professionally aggrieved snigger at us. So her father was mean so what? I just don’t care. I stand with her father. United.
I have little sympathy for the father, it seems a typical scenario of a White child growing up with no true sense of racial identity, whose parents have negated their vital duties in instilling that identity positively and making their children care about their ancestors and culture and wanting to preserve it, the parents may have ranted about non-Whites their whole life, but that is not positive, it offers no counter or incentive to oppose societies propaganda…so while the parents don’t bother teaching their children anything about who they are, they expect them to naturally stick to their own.
I watch the First 48 with my kids. Plenty of life lessons
All this commotion and she hardly even looks white. I see some middle eastern, jewish, or some other darker genes there.
I mean, at least get the racial facts correct before talking about race.
This young lady is from a small town in Arkansas, as I am from a small town in the South, this is all too common a phenomenon in our region. Young white girls are inundated and bombarded with black hype and culture such as music, movies, and especially athletics from the first days of public school. Our public schools in the small town South with large black populations are in decay, and are breeding grounds for our young girls to fall victim to these savages. Many poor whites cannot afford private schools or moving to white school districts. I saw some of the comments and fallout on social media from this situation, and there were numerous pictures of this girl showing her to look very Caucasian to me. Not all of us are lucky enough to have blond hair and blue eyes. I for one am no ready to give up on our southern girls, and that includes the dark haired ones. The South as a region needs to quit worshiping these black athletes, and start protecting our white girls.
Yes, the whole thing may be Kabuki theatre to placard (((White Prejudice))).
She looks almost “Turkish” in that photo. Or…
Hayes (if her family name) – might be an adaptation of for example, Aas.
Lots of Sephardim in the South: e.g. Joachim Prinz – “The Secret Jews”.
Lots of Ashkenazim in the South, Mid-West, East…. e.g. Stephen Birmingham: “Our “Crowd”.
Lots of Sephardim in the Caribbean, South America: e.g. Edward Kritzler – “Jewish Pirates of the Caribbean”.
Talmud (Babli Yoma 22b) – it is forbidden to count Jews even for a mitzvah.
I’m afraid no secret jewess here or any jewish conspiracy at play. Just a very confused anglo saxon girl in the midst of rampant cultural decay. Drive through the South during April(prom season), and you could write dozens of these articles.
I’d stand with the father anyday–anywhere! He reacted appropriately, the only thing he should have done differently is to told her face what he thought of her, instead of texting her. I am all with the dad here. So he said some things that hurt your little sensitive feelings. Have you ever listened to how blacks talk about whites when they are in charge, or they think that white people are not around–I have? Can you imagine the things the jews say about us in their little enclaves–I do?
My daughter saw a horrible incident when a black man confronted me. That stopped her desire to ever be around them. I did have one call her and I questioned her, but she assured me he was nothing. She is happily married to a blonde haired male with two beautiful white children. Let them see the blacks and explain their behavior.
This article states that children are naturally rebellious, but that is completely wrong. Teen rebellion was memed into existence by jewish intellectual frauds in the 20th Century, and it was specifically directed at Whites to make our children susceptible to jewish programming. Teen rebellion does not exist outside of first world White countries. How often do you see non-Whites rebelling against their parents or “going through a phase?” It doesn’t happen.
The reason why children race mix is because they live in a society that promotes it as the highest good. Whites are bombardment with miscegenation propaganda 24/7, and most White parents are liberals or cuckservatives. If you want to stop your kid from racemixing, you have to be the kind of parent you want them to be eventually. You have to be smart, successful, and better than those around you. If you’re a strong, successful, and race-conscious parent, your kids will naturally follow your trajectory and also marry White.
Boy-beaters too oft,
As in the late Cyril Smith MP for one.
The medieval schoolmaster needed only a boy, a book and a birch….
Not that I have any particular reservations when it comes to a spot of Emersonian Compensation for violent thugs, as in
I think it’s the corpun.com site that refers somewhere to the Isle of Man policeman nick-named “The Ghoul” by his colleagues as he apparently acquired quite a taste for bum-bashing with a spray of twigs.
Note from the above article “The reputation of the birch was worse than the reality.” This was probably true, since the birch (albeit of smaller dimensions than the Manx variety) was still being used at Eton School (“Pop/fenestration”) in the late 1950s/1960s and in British prisons up to either the late 1940s or early 1960s (offhand I forget which). “Mad” Frankie Fraser the notoriously violence-prone gangster in his TV interview I saw screened a year or two ago remarked that before abolition naughty prisononers got either the cat or the birch. The luckless man would be told some days in advance of his impending punishment to reflect upon it. For the cat the upper garments were removed, for the birch it was – let’s be having yer strides mate! Fraser of course was himself birched on more than one occasion and despite saying cor it didn’t half hurt, that didn’t stop him getting repeat helpings. Mind over matter, then.
Violence does solve all problems, one way or another, and permanently or temporarily, but as ever it’s a matter of balance, and being assaulted when a child for routine errancy by a much larger adult with an implement is not something I personally find justifiable – for either party. After all, revenge is a dish best enjoyed cold…
(I remember a teacher informing my middle school class many years ago that an enraged parent came to school after his son was caned and discharged a shotgun into the ceiling. No mention of any police response. Those were the days in the good-old-UK).
My suggestion: mixed-race people are not admitted in White countries but have to live in the negro-countries.
My prediction: no female will choose to live in a negro-country instead of a White country.
This method works because it makes cause – effect clear. It simply brings to mind what “Black” really means. It means no civilisation and no material wealth.
No woman will choose that. Problem solved
(I very much disapprove of spanking children. There may be rare exceptions but generally, calm and loving acting affects the behavior).
At age of 9 I was prone to play truant during my piano lessons on Saturday mornings.
One Saturday morning my piano teacher spotted me in the square and said why have I been missing my Saturday lessons, and were my parents aware of this. I hurriedly replied yes, they know and some story about being ill. The downside of my reply was the teacher also spotted my mother several hours later in the square, and enquired about my malaise affecting my piano classes on Saturday mornings. That afternoon my father walked into the lounge, with a belt, and proceeded , not to spanked me , but to belt me furiously. I can now only remember my howling and crying like a wounded animal. eventually my mother walked in and made him stop the belting. I would kiss my fathers hand a thousand times over and thanked him for the appropriate response to my cheating piano classes. From that day on , the word truant disappeared from my vocabulary. I learnt my lesson, the hard way, never to forget it. There is nothing like a good beating to nip the “rebelliousness ” in the bud.
Mixed race people will enjoy dominance in the non-White countries they will live in. They have no place amongst us.
The full blooded negro has a better character than the mixed in all honesty, as I think Alex Kurtagic also observed.
Mix and you’re out. Forever. For all generations.
The article does not mention that most Black parents themselves have a strong desire – even stronger than Whites, imo, – for their children to marry a Black in order that their grandchildren will look like themselves and help carry on their Black DNA into the future. All perfectly natural inclinations – so long as it is done by Blacks, but never by those ‘evil White racists’
Of course, as well as dumbed-down White trash race-mixing there is also the huge Black underclass of males who take the opportunity to mate with White females – often on a temporary basis – in a futile attempt to raise the IQ of their mulatto offspring and that of Blacks in general. Miscegenation with Whites is the only way that the Black race can gain a higher IQ.
Children actually have very strong natural “racist” instincts. There have been a number of studies that confirm this with infants being able to identify same and different race photos, even prior to them becoming self-aware of what race they are themselves.
Anyone who has raised or been around small children knows that they will eventually make a social gaff and blurt out some harmless racial observation. Most parents leap for the chance of “a teachable moment” to “correct” the “bad behavior.”
My solution has been to not correct them and just allow their healthy, natural instincts and observation skills to develop. You don’t have to be heavy handed in indoctrinating a child, you just have to make sure they are not receiving mixed messages or associate being honest about such topics with being punished.
When they are older (10-12 years old or so) you can explain that it is considered impolite to discuss such things, not because they are untrue, but because it is a peer enforced norm.
Another way to subtly influence is to be race neutral and watch a world star hip hop type video occasionally and say things like “I can’t believe what these kids are doing!” You don’t have to tell them that it is violent, dangerous blacks. They will make the association on their own having seen it with their own two eyes. With less than five viewings of such incidents, paced out over time, never using any racial language, the association is made upon its own, especially if it is unprovoked gang attacks on white women with children present. Occasionally drive through a run down black neighborhood and with zero commentary – let them see collapsed buildings, garbage everywhere, people wandering through traffic, etc…
Once they have seen these kinds of things, no amount of fictional TV shows, commercials, and movies, nor any of the multi-culti crap they are taught in schools will alter their tether to reality.
They will not see black culture as cool and hip. They will associate it with ruin and violence, then make informed decisions to avoid it completely for the rest of their lives.
All you need to do is make her understand that high quality white men will avoid her like the plague. Even the the biggest shitlib white man would not look twice at her, if he had other options.
Men with options (attractive men) don’t touch racemixers.
This is easier for women to comprehend than any HBD statistics. And most white women tacitly understand this, which is why intermarriage rates are comparatively low for whites.
An excellent article on a very important topic! I agree that a profanity laced text was the last in what was probably a long series of ineffective tactics. This kind of stuff is a marathon and not a sprint. A flurry of impassioned activity at the end can never make up for shirking the long slow struggle for years.
I have a very large extended family. Only two relatives (one male and one female) in my generation or younger have had known inter-racial relationships. Both were from the only two families to have divorced (probably not a coincidence). The male took a black girl to his junior dance. The next year he took a white girl and they went on to get married and have three healthy white kids.
Not surprisingly, the female was not so lucky. She gained weight after her parents divorced and her father had a limited presence in her life from age 13 onwards. In those circumstances, whoever gave her attention came out the winner. She had two bastard daughters from the same black man. He never contributed financially and never lived with their children. She never had a serious relationship afterwards.
This result conforms to the results of studies on parent-child value transmission. http://psyc526final.wikispaces.com/file/view/Value+transmission+in+the+family.pdf
After skimming this study, the hierarchy of variables seems to be 1) closeness to the parent, 2) agreement of the value between the parents, 3) that the “adolescents [believe] that their parents also gave importance to autonomy and independence of thought and action (self-direction)” giving them a sense of having choices and coming to their own conclusions.
Also of note, daughters and sons are equally influenced by their fathers. Mothers exert a stronger influence on their daughters adoption of values than their sons. I didn’t catch a comparison of Fathers and Mothers, but, considering the large variations of family status and father’s work-life balance, it would be hard to make an apples-to-apples comparison in such a study.
We live in a culture that is our enemy. That is the fundament that must be explained and exemplified by every white parent. To do anything less is to invite miscegenation. First, indoctrinate your woman – and if she insists on being a ‘liberal’-dump her. Second, throw away the TV. Third, home school your kids. Four, live in as close to a white environment as you can. Five, explain at every opportunity the distinctions in bi-pedal hominids – and never use the confusing terms ‘humanity’ or ‘Homo Sapiens’. Six, study and educate your children in the concept of Identity Christianity so that they will both have a moral sensibility and an ideology to confront the deceptions in ‘human equality’.
If you do these things in a loving manner while they are young they will have a philosophical basis to confront Zog and they’re ego will form around it as a matter of individualism, rather than
adopting an alien belief in rebellion against parental authority.
The ‘abusive’ father above naturally felt that his daughter had a sense of identity that would offset the propaganda of the time. That is why he was so shocked and reacted – really- as the only way he could-cut her off. We can always have more children. Our obligation is not to them ultimately but to our genome. But our ‘girls’ – inherently silly-will too easily fall prey to the desire for affection and attention if they are not educated correctly as children. Look at the Jews and the Mormons. Instruction from childhood is the key.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment