Counter-Currents
Good Intentions or the Maddest Folly?
Dissident Voices Helping Kamala Harris Win Could Not Be More Wrong
Richard Parker
1,564 words 
There has been increasing chatter and murmurings in right-wing circles denouncing the candidacy of Donald Trump, advocating for either abstention from voting or even voting for Kamala Harris. This commentary runs the gambit, from commentators I actually like and respect, such as the far-right commentator Devon Stack (aka Black Pilled), to more dubious figures, notably Nick Fuentes, whose number of personal shortcomings and bizarre mannerisms raise the question whether he is “black propaganda” (if he is not, he might as well be). All of this is incredibly misguided.
To be sure, both the Trump presidency, his candidacy, and Trump as a person leave much to be desired. Both Trump as an individual as well as his campaign are shamelessly Judeophilic, as was his administration. This is reflected in both policy and his personal life. A recent campaign speech demonstrates this, as well as his pardoning a number of Jewish criminals, including commuting the sentence of Sholom Rubashkin, the mastermind of the Potsville kosher slaughterhouse debacle. There is perhaps no better example demonstrating this in both his professional and personal capacities than Ivanka Trump, given her marriage to Jared Kushner, as well as the scandalous manner in which Trump had appointed her and that husband of hers to handle affairs in his administration. Most recently, his campaign has been rightly criticized if not outright condemned for a number of other things, including pandering to black and other minority voters, even though that has proven to be a most ineffective and disgraceful tactic, while also ignoring the white vote in a few critical swing states, a gaffe that could very well cost him the presidency. His repeated comments about wanting a great deal of “legal immigration,” ostensibly from elite Indians, Chinese, and even Southeast Asians, are also greatly troubling.
These and others criticisms are entirely legitimate, but the suggestion or even insistence that those against the Democrats and the left not vote for him, either by abstaining or voting for Harris, could not be more misguided. One of the underlying currents of this sentiment is clearly the idea of accelerationism, the idea that worse conditions are desirable because they are more likely to hasten a “black swan” event that could lead to outright revolt if not civil war. Those who advocate for such views probably took fiction like Red Dawn a little too seriously. Very much for the worse, the United States government remains an entity that is just as powerful and is it pernicious, an entity that is not a lethal instrument, but wields a number of lethal instruments at its disposal once a political mandate and consolidation of power has been so secured. This is so particularly given the surveillance state that has arisen with the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act, to say nothing of the increasing militarization of the police.
Those inclined to such views often invoke either the Revolutionary War, or how the war machine of the American Empire has not fared well since World War II, unable to vanquish either the Viet Cong or the Taliban, consisting to some degree of rice patty farmers and goat herders while armed with AK-47s, improvised explosive devices, and sandals. Such misguided comparisons fail to take into account how those adversaries hail from an alien culture that does not value human life the way our European tradition does, compounded by the deprivation imposed by poverty and hardship that most Americans can neither fathom nor tolerate. The Revolutionary War is equally unconvincing. No one from that era or in other times passed could even dream of the machinations of either the modern surveillance state, or how utterly devastating modern weaponry is. The British Empire, quite obviously, did not have drones, or tactical nuclear weapons that could eviscerate a pesky stronghold if a particularly ruthless government were so inclined, or any modern weaponry that could obliterate any serious insurrection in an instant. The seat of power of the British Empire, namely the monarchy, was also across the Atlantic, not in the modern era of airline jets, but the age of sail. The British Empire also chose to sue for peace in large part because of greater entanglements with the French, not because the British Empire could not, with proper motivation, ultimately prevail in the Revolutionary War. Both comparisons fail because most Americans, and indeed most whites in Europe and the West, are far too comfortable to endure the sort of deprivation and hardship that the accelerationist model fails to account for accurately.
In considering this position, the role of SCOTUS as well as other administrative appointments cannot be stressed enough. Clarence Thomas, an extraordinary black man no less an outlier than a 6-1 foot woman, is 78 years old. Samuel Alito, who authored the seminal and brilliant Dobbs decision correctly overturning Roe v Wade, is 74 years old. These two justices might be able to serve another four years, but there is a strong likelihood they will not. And if they do, another four years of open border lunacy will push the deteriorating demographics beyond the breaking point, ensuring no Republican will ever win the White House Again. If Kamala Harris wins, these and other justices would have to remain alive and in service for at least eight or twelve years, or more.
Americans are doggedly naïve in thinking that either the Constitution or the government protect so-called “rights” the way high school civics class implores. Hardly inalienable at all, those rights are conferred only so long as there is not a political mandate and the practical ability to remove them by state action. Left-wing circles and institutions of education that have, to put it mildly, succumbed to ideo-political capture, have questioned the “First Amendment,” both as set of social norms valuing freedom of expression and as legal proscription against government censorship for some time, with a majority of millennials and zoomers either believing that the First Amendment does not protect so-called hate speech, or that it ought not to. The abominations that are Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson inform us of the odious sort of Supreme Court nominees Kamala Harris—or her handlers—would appoint if she should be elected. Tim Walz, the vice-presidential candidate, has explicitly stated that so-called “hate speech” and “misinformation” should not enjoy protection from government censorship.
Keir Starmer’s crackdown on right-wing dissidents rightly revolting against some of the more pernicious auspices of the Great Replacement as well as the peculiarly hard stance against January 6 protestors reveal what will happen if Kamala Harris wins. It is not that Donald Trump is the American Caesar, the right-wing authoritarian who can save the West in the spirit of Francisco Franco or Augusto Pinochet. It is that electing Donald Trump “tips the ball” and prevents the Democrats from consolidating power beyond the point of no return. Of course, those of an accelerationist persuasion should realize that the United Kingdom does not have nearly the infrastructure to crack down on dissidents the way the United States can. Such a crackdown in the States would be far more severe, and devastating.
Ultimately, things may have progressed beyond the point of no return, regardless of what happens. Many of these problems needed to have been dealt with long before this author was even born, either in the 1930s and 40s, or even as late as the 1950s should McCarthyism have been correctly regarded as not going nearly far enough. There is also the strong likelihood that the fix is already in—what else could explain such brazen moves by the Democrats, nominating Harris without a primary, choosing Walz as her running mate, among other outrages. That stated, if our civilization is to be rehabilitated, dissident elements must bide for time. As stated, a Trump presidency prevents a further consolidation of power by the Democrats. It also would offer a respite from the free-for-all on the border, whereby the Biden-Harris administration has let in millions of third world black and brown people, which not only begets voter fraud in jurisdictions that issue driver licenses and state identification to illegals, which can then be used to register to vote, but imports “Democrat larvae” by way of anchor babies. The sentiment condemning Trump’s many shortcomings is laudable. The suggestion that it would be preferable for him to no to be elected could not be more ludicrous.
Trump has promised to instigate mass deportations if elected. He also promised “lock up” Hilary Clinton, then stated that was just campaign bluster. Even if he were sincere, an irretrievably corrupt and dysfunctional legal system would tie him up for years, just as it did four to eight years ago on other matters. But a pernicious state preoccupied thwarting Trump is infinitely better than a pernicious state facilitated by this empty vessel of a brown woman, an object of ridicule known as a Witzfigur in the German language; a woman who is no less a puppet than the geriatric, criminal politician who preceded her, a man so brazenly corrupt he rivals that of the Clintons. Some may think that may not matter, but even staving off full consolidation of power for four years could be enough time to gain a critical mass of persons to come to that dark but essential epiphany on matters of race, democracy, and so much more.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
56 comments
An excellent review of reasons to vote for Trump, all correct. I would add, for men, the desirability of keeping power out of women’s hands. We have seen, for at least the last two generations, women becoming more masculine and men, especially White men, becoming more feminine. If you were born with testicles, you need to defend them, for the women are sharpening their knives …
I agree 100% with no female POTUS –a guaranteed recipe for certain hell on earth. One of my first very red-pilling experiences was watching (Israel-First, Brit) PJW’s 10 min documentary ‘The Islamic State of Sweden’ (still on bitchute.) See the first European-feminist govt allow it’s country to become rape capital of the world!
I have 3 young adult sons who never asked to be born. They’re ‘not into politics’; and I’m constantly thinking about their future in America. I couldn’t agree with you more about the importance of keeping Trump & Melania, a masculine (as far as civic nationalist go) White male with his elegant, European, former super-model First Lady, leading America, on the world stage. It will be a morale booster & a visual reminder of what traditional role models should look like for so many young men who have given up on marriage, family. I understand it’s as authentic as any other reality show, but optics do matter. Melania’s role is very ceremonial: support, and be a cheerleader, for her husband, always. Even during fancy state dinner parties & balls, the man leads, and the lady follows his lead, and everything remains orderly.
I feel very to have grown up during the 1980s, perhaps the last American decade when masculine men & feminine women were still celebrated.
“The feminization of men always leads to the masculinization of women.”
Joseph Goebbels, 1934
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb55.htm
Excellent, wise comment. Women in general make poor leaders as well as poor voters. Margaret Thatcher wasn’t as great as her admirers assert, but she was still a supreme exception to the rule against women in leadership roles. I happen to like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has fight in her and mostly for the right things, and would vote for her, despite her being a bit nutty. But she’s another rarity. And the symbolism of confident white man with beautiful wife Trump vs DEI Harris and her liberal Jewish entertainment lawyer husband is indeed yet another reason to support him.
With the catastrophic feminization of an entire generation of men, I can imagine a future where we will need white alpha-female hyena schoolmarms like Thatcher, Greene, Marine Le Pen and others to get anything done. Bleak but I’ll take it over someone like Nick Fuentes.
Thank you, Lord Shang.
When mulling over female leaders, one important distinction which many folks tend to forget when comparing U.S. with other nations is that, unlike UK, for example, America’s POTUS is Also Military Commander in Chief.
I agree. Accelerationism is too risky, and there’s not much margin for error lately. As for now, we should think a few steps ahead and plan for what our line will be whatever outcome the election will bring. Myself, I predict that there will be election tampering just like four years ago, with the media doing their usual shield wall once again.
All of these apologia for voting for Trump favor the same assumption: White Nationalists can arrive at White Nationalism by supporting something other than White Nationalism.
The simple political fact is that in order for the ‘White Nationalist vote to matter, it cannot be given if the candidate isn’t at the very least, openly pro-White Nationalism.
This should be obvious.
In fact, it’s so obvious that only a whole bunch of words could possibly obscure it.
Which is why so much is being written about ‘Why you should vote for a non-White Nationalist.’
One either takes their White Nationalism seriously enough to not support national political candidacies that are not openly pro-White Nationalist.
If candidates can speak openly of their support for the jews, the Negroes, the Browns and the Yellows, then they could speak openly of their support for Whites.
But they don’t. Neither Trump nor Vance offer any policies specifically oriented toward reparations for almost a century of anti-White policies.
Whites are the ‘generic American’ who gets generic support while all of the hypenated-Americans get targeted support.
Either White Nationalism is a specific political position or it’s just ‘conservatism plus slurs’.
If you think White Nationalism is ‘conservatism plus slurs’ then vote Trump.
But it you think revolutionary White racial consciousness matters…
If you think racial separatism is the best way forward for Whites…
If you think Whites should rule their own territories in the interest of Whites…
Then ‘conservatism plus slurs’ should not cut it.
I don’t understand how jaded racial-political purists have argued themselves into being actively anti-Trump. We have a blonde-haired blue-eyed colossus at the head of a quasi-nationalist mass movement bellowing about mass deportations, rooting out the enemy within, non-white invader vermin with bad genes gobbling up our pets and poisoning the blood of the nation. By all means we should agitate his campaign and hopefully administration as much as possible to cater to our priorities and continue to critique his failures and betrayals, but, taking a step back, the metapolitical landscape is unimaginably better than a decade ago and, while all the nationalist intellectuals and shitposters toiling away laid the groundwork, it took Trump to essentially single-handedly upend the reigning cultural orthodoxies and expand the Overton Window to the point where we can get our foot in the door to the halls of power and all issues and narratives are potentially up for grabs. I think if most normal white men went with their gut instincts rather than theorycel-ing themselves into knots, they would naturally ride the fun, goofy, McMeme-able MAGA wave along with all of their not-quite-racially-conscious salt of the earth white countrymen who are the exact (and only) types of people we need to influence in our direction, not write off as hopelessly cucked moronic scum because they haven’t used their guns to spontaneously rise up in an orgy of revolutionary violence. Vote Trump, hope he wins, but either way remain cheerfully resolute and strategize the best courses of action for our cause and our folk regardless of the outcome.
My objection to voting for Trump has nothing to do with racial purism. That’s a straw man. My objection to voting for Trump is that he’s not a White Nationalist and that both he and Vance have openly rejected White Nationalism at different times. If you want to vote for ‘conservatism plus slurs’ go ahead, but it has nothing to do with supporting White Nationalism. You’re giving your vote away to a guy who wouldn’t want it if you attached even 1/1000th of the string the jews have put on their vote.
At some point, White Nationalism has to cease to be a movement of disgruntled White people looking to be recognized and given a seat a the table as ‘conservatives plus slurs’ and direct its energies and resources toward revolutionary White racial consciousness and revolutionary White racial politics.
If Trump can give you what you want, you don’t really need White Nationalism. You can just get buy with ‘conservatism’.
Yeah, I basically agree the current regime is deadly to us as well as terminally ill on its own, and I have heard well reasoned, thought provoking arguments that a Kamal presidency could be better for white interests in the long run, and why Trump doesn’t deserve our vote (at many points I have declared as much myself – the immigration betrayals, the vaxx madness, the pardons for Jew crooks and spies and rappers leaving the Jan 6 political prisoners to rot). I don’t begrudge people who choose not to vote or vote dem or Constitution Party.
I just can’t ignore the irrational, or extra-rational, vibes – the venomous fear of our enemies who wrongly believe him to be the chieftain of the white tribe, the desperate hopes of poor white masses who, also wrongly, see him as the same. Maybe Kamala would ultimately be better for us, maybe not. If white advocates were as organized as the NRA used to be and could openly announce we were withholding support and when we caused Trump’s loss everyone would know that to be true, I would probably join that effort. As it is, not doing something as simple and easy as filling out a ballot because true ethnonationalism is not on the table could be resigning ourselves to inert political irrelevancy.
I know the big orange doofus, while in many ways an extraordinary person, is not a true leader, nor even a plain statesmen. I know that the whole administration and MAGA and Q and whatall will embarrass and disappoint. But that path, like 2015-16, could incrementally (I think 2016 was a not insignificant increment) move the public, especially real Americans, in the right direction. I hope it slowly turns the lens of their perception to things that really, actually matter, instead of “big government,” or “socialism,” or “democrats being the real racists,” or “the CCP,” or whatever silly notion they fancy the cause of the sorry state of their world.
There is no way in the world that if the Kamalamala coterie wins that it will be good for White people.
No Fracking way (sorry for the F).
I used to be a Steward for an electrical and atomic workers Union in Idaho and basically only Democrats were decent regarding Labor.
I voted for Reagan and was not otherwise a huge admirer of Democrats unless they had good ratings with the National Rifle Association and were not anti-White.
But I learned by the Clinton Administration that this was yesteryear. The “new Democrats” were more about Globalization and DEI than anything else including economic progress that might benefit White working people. Even Black Obama had to extenuate greatly until into his second term. In spite of the first Mulatto President, they were able to keep the proverbial Mask in place on their anti-White hatred.
However, with Trump in 2016 actually capturing the nominaton of the other party, the Mask has finally fallen off (as Dr. Goebbels would have put it) on the Democratic Party.
They are the anti-White Party.
The GOPe are wannabe nïggers at best and Trump stole their milk money. This is important, so I hope that it sinks in.
The GOP and Trump may be nearly hopeless, but at least they are NOT the sworn enemy of White People and “White Supremacy.”
Kamalamala is exactly that.
Trump is not our guy, but he got us a narrow sliver of movement in the Right direction (pun intentional) on the frozen Overton Window ─ and that is something we can work with. Bigly.
Hamburger T says that talking about Illegal immigration is bait-and-switch and he is not wrong. This is a crucial issue, yes, and it is a start only ─ one that has resonated with the Deplorables (i.e., decent White people). And to use another metaphor, all journeys begin with a single step.
I was unable to find videos on YouTube of the late Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain campaigning on the border while running for reelection as the senior U.S. Senator from Arizona where he shouts “build the dang wall.” But I can assure you that White Nationalists close to the border issue already know that the GOPe was never more than token-serious on the subject.
President Trump was disappointing but he was considerably more serious. Attorney General Sessions did some good work on border security between Obama and Biden, which would be stupid to dismiss as irrelevant.
The enemy camp certainly does not think so. They are borderline hysterical over the whole issue. The idea of deporting Illegals and their minor “anchor baby” dependants is for them the equivalent of “Gas the Joos.”
Look, if one lives in a razor-thin swing state, then by all means do vote for Trump. I think that is the WN thing to do.
If you live in a solid Red or Blue state it might not matter electorally, but I would urge you to push up the legally-irrelevant “Popular Vote” for Trump regardless, to send a message to the Left.
We can do better things when the proverbial Mask is off on their anti-White agenda and they are running hysterically. We even have a couple of billionaires (at least nominally) in our camp.
That may be nothing more than a clawed foothold with a deep canyon wall still to climb, but it’s a start. WN is either doable or it isn’t.
🙂
I don’t think Harris will be better for Whites. I don’t think Trump will be better for Whites. I don’t think national American politics can be better for Whites because it’s specifically designed to hurt Whites at every opportunity. If White people stopped thinking that national politics was a legitimate way to achieve their objectives and, instead, turned to local politics and the politics of nullification and ‘local rule’, we’d make progress. The national game is rigged. Every time you play, you make ‘the house’ (the jews, especially), more wealthy and more powerful.
The most important political signal pro-Whites and White Nationalists could send to the nation electoral system is ‘We’re not going to play a rigged game. We’re done. No legitimacy for you!’
Then we should start working locally to learn how to keep the lights on and clean water flowing in the case of siege warfare on majority White areas.
Replying to JRE’s comment, dated October 25, 2024 at 11:48 pm
Your view (and the view of many of the people here who support Trump) is, basically, that a Trump presidency will lead to the “Overton window” shift among Whites, meaning to the gradual shifting of the White public consciousness in an explicitly pro-White direction, guided by the intellectual and online White Nationalist elite.
The problem with this thinking, for the United States specifically, are the numbers. The official American census states that the White population in America is 62%, however, this is not correct since the US Census accepts/includes various groups as “White” who really are not, such as Indians, Arabs, many mixed-race Hispanics, Turks, Jews, etc. The real number currently is, at most, 50% (I personally think it is less than that but let’s be optimistic). Not to mention that the White population is, by far, the most advanced in age.
Now, assuming that it takes at least one to two more decades for the racial “Overton window” to shift to a sufficient extent (without a civil war breaking out, in the meantime), this will also mean that, in about a decade, the White population – through aging, race mixing (which is very popular with young Americans) and immigration (especially “legal immigration”, which Trump/Vance have no problem with and actually encourage) – will drop to about 40%. And, in two decades, that number will drop to about 30% (these numbers are consistent with the way White demographics have been declining in America in the last half century). The question then, of course, becomes: what use is an Overton window shift with those kinds of numbers?
Now, just to give some perspective, the White demographics of South Africa were about 20% in the late 1980s, right before the end of Apartheid (1990). Did any member of the international community care about or help this White minority when its rights were stripped away by the new South African government? To give another example, the current demographics of the country of Colombia, in South America, are about 25% White. Columbia is widely considered to be a “shithole” country, which millions of people try to escape every year. Would you like to live in Columbia?
So, my point is that, regardless of who wins the upcoming American “election”, White people will become an absolute minority in the United States in the near future, with demographics equivalent to third-world countries. The long-term demographic shifts leading to this are impossible to reverse. The idea that giving Trump another four years to shift the “Overton window” will magically prevent this is hopium of the strongest kind, especially since Trump already had four years to show his true colors (as George Bush once said, or tried to say, “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me”).
Does this mean, then, that all hope is lost? No, it actually does not. But it does require Americans to face certain realities instead of getting brainlessly high off of the fumes of Trump’s McDonald’s french fry fryer (the growing risks of contracting a terminal E. coli infection from McD’s, notwithstanding). And once those realities are faced, we can then look at other solutions to this unavoidable problem. A large part of whether these solutions can make themselves heard here at CC, specifically, will depend also on the editing team, whom I would strongly encourage to give new writers a voice. Granted, some of these newer solutions will appeal more to younger readers and White nationalists. However, the White race as a whole must not allow older individuals who are only thinking in the short-term (since they might be dead soon and won’t have to experience the post-White racial hell of America) to mislead the young away from a real White future and towards the soothing but, ultimately, fatal poppy fields of Trumplandia.
B.S. I am an older individual and very concerned by a decent White legacy even though (thankfully) I will be dead soon. I’m a younger Boomer (1946-1964).
And GFY if you think that I am not concerned about a White legacy for some reason. That has never been far from my mind since I was a whippersnapper.
For people who are going to use what Mr. Goad calls Generational Astrology, Trump (1946) is an older Boomer and Kamalamala is a younger Boomer (1964).
The Great Savior Barack Hussein Obama was a Boomer too (1961). Considering that Reagan turned 70 after he was inaugurated in 1981, a President elected in 2028 could very well be a Boomer too.
I am not sure if the younger generations have The Right Stuff at all. If they don’t, then our White legacy really is screwed. And it won’t matter who gets the blame.
And btw, Phil Donahue was a “Silent Generation,” born just short of a decade before Trump. The “Astrologists” need to get their dates and terms right.
I have been a true believer and advocate for what is now called White Nationalism for a very long time. I was reading George Lincoln Rockwell and sending my hard-earned farthings to the NSWPP longer than most of you have been alive and clacking on keyboards.
Long before the long gasoline lines of 1973, I understood that the old 1965 America was gone as a tender ten-year-old in 1971 with the appeasement of Communism and the first wage-price freezes, and the ominous glimpses on TV news of the most vile anti-White agitation beginning in the early Sixties when I was growing up in what was still a White America. I started school in Las Vegas in 1966 and it was a Whitetopia compared to today. It did not stay that way for long after the Kennedy-Johnson Civil Rights revolution took bitter root.
WN has never had the electoral numbers to advocate openly for White interests, and that is not going to change with Trump. Nobody seriously believes that.
Trump didn’t get us a seat at the table. We aren’t even in the board room.
What we got was 1) infinitely better judicial appointments than otherwise, 2) the Mask fell off of the Left because of Trump breaking ranks with the Establishment, and thus they could not help their natures and revealed an anti-White hatred for all to see, and 3) the frozen Overton-something window was cracked over to the Right just a little bit, and now we can listen and peer into the spaces that only billionaire establishment contrarians could fear to tread.
We can imagine open pro-White political organizing for the first time ─ maybe ever.
We have a lot to do. I am not sure if anybody is up to muster but I remain hopeful.
Kamalamala will certainly go full bore anti-White, giving millions of Illegals amnesty, and de facto citizenship and thus the Holy vote within a dozen years or so. We might have another White candidate in 2028, but even so, the Kamala regime will be so blindingly anti-White that you will need to wear shades and carry a white cane afterwards (assuming that doing so is not made illegal along with “Hate” Speech and Holodenial).
🙂
I agree with you, of course, but am disturbed by two statements of yours: that you’ll be “dead soon”, and that you were “a ten year old in 1971”. Wait – I was a 10 year old by the start of the Fall school semester in 1971! So I must ask: what do you mean by “soon”? I certainly hope (and live as though) I will NOT be “dead soon”. Within 20 years, quite likely, but is that “soon”? The Left can do tremendous damage over two decades. Look what they’ve done since 2020!
Trump buys us metapolitical awakening time (as I was arguing against Hamburger back in 2020). He just might also build the damn wall (esp if Vance pushes it, as JD knows his future depends on that Wall), as well as follow through on his deportations (I wish Trump would somehow find a legislative or legal way to deputize tens of millions of patriots to help with that; I sure as hell would join up, at least for weekends, and even if they stuck a 63 year old in some logistical or clerical job away from the ‘field’!).
Trump’s judicial appointments will 100% guaranteed be better for whites than Kamala’s.
Trump will 100% guaranteed be better for free speech and gun rights.
Trump will 100% guaranteed be better on not granting an amnesty for tens of millions of aliens.
Trump will 100% guaranteed be better on not using the Deep State against whites, esp dissidents.
Many around here don’t care about this (though they should!), but Trump will 100% guaranteed be better for property rights and the economy than Kamala.
These are reasons enough to hope for a Trump victory. The only downside or other side is what I’ve discussed in comments on another thread. Trump’s erratic behavior and widespread unpopularity will likely lose GOP the House in 26, and very possibly both the Senate and the Presidency in 2028. Will his accomplishments over the next four years have been worth those losses?
Tough prediction.
To respond to the comments from:
Lord Shang October 27, 2024 at 2:55 am
When I say I will be dead soon, I guess that “soon” is relative. I’m not ill but I was run over by a junkie who blew a red light while I was bicycling from my academic drone job. Thanks to good luck and a state health plan, I am still around, although some days maybe not so much.
I am not what I was in my forties, but with two weeks until age 63, I’m still griping about the accident almost two decades later. I was learning to walk again during the Hurricane Katrina event and wondering about all the people in nursing homes left abandoned without electricity and the Darkies marauding about the Chocolate City in simple boats.
Anyway, my chain-smoking grandfather dropped dead at 63 just after he signed up for Social Security. But this is an aberation. My parents are octogenarians who are still alive, and I just did smashingly well on my heart scan.
I have four sisters and a score of nieces and nephews plus spouses and not so many of them are Libtards. It would be nice to see things really turn around for White people before my dotage, but I probably won’t even be able to retire until I do literally drop.
Good health and prosperity to you, Lord Shang, and I always enjoy reading your comments.
🙂
Great comment.
You make only a passing reference to the long-standing GOP-succoring tendencies of some older White folks, yet the navel-gazing responses fixate on that and respond not at all to the scenario of demographic downfall scenario you lay out.
Trump is nothing but a time- and energy- sink for White people. But, he’s made his money building casinos; so he knows what to do with suckers.
Reply to Chloë October 27, 2024 at 2:12 pm
Thank you 🙂
No one has made the argument to vote for Trump on the basis of what, with any certainty, he will do. Because there isn’t anything.
He said repeatedly last time he would ‘Build the wall’, ‘Drain the swamp’ and ‘Lock her up’.
I felt certain we would at least have a border wall when Trump’s first term was finished. But it didn’t happen.
This time there are not even the promises offered by sloganeering.
Wrong. Trump’s judicial appintments at all levels were infinitely better than Hillary’s would have been.
And some border wall was built along the Arizona border with Trump ─ a major smuggling corridor ─ although Congress would not fund it and I never expected that Mexico paying for the Wall was anything other than campaign rhetoric.
As soon as Trump was gone, President Biden tried his level best to open up the Third World floodgates again. And when a Democrat was elected to the Arizona governorship by a sliver in 2022, she wasted no time dismantling parts of the wall that were provisional stopgaps without replacing it with anything better.
Anyway, because the mask fell off on the anti-White Hate regime directly from Trump beoming a politician and trashing the ongoing migrant invasion ─ as any good rayciss gentleman should ─ there is a possibility that White political organization is possible, maybe for the first time ever. My parents voted for George Wallace in 1968, the last time that a third-party candidate ever got ANY electoral votes. He might have done reasonably well as a rayciss Democrat running in 1972 had he not been shot.
Go to a Trump rally and see who goes there if you don’t believe me. They are not dumb Rednecks. The only Darkie that I saw at a Trump rally in Arizona was the guy walking along the queue in three-digit heat selling them t-shirts.
🙂
Re Trump’s judicial appointments (+ Clarence Thomas).
You might want to read Stench, a book by David Brock. Clarence & his wife, along with the Trump justices, are apparently busy as bees converting Amerika into a Christian dictatorship. Here – I’ll sum up its contents with portions of reviews, though all the reviews sound much the same:
“A full-throated denunciation of a corrupt, thoroughly politicized Supreme Court in which the true chief justice is Clarence Thomas…The Court, writes Brock, became Thomas’s the minute Amy Coney Barrett took Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s seat on the bench in 2020…Critics of the current Supreme Court will find plenty of support in Brock’s aggrieved, well-documented exposé.” —Kirkus Reviews
“As David Brock shows in this deeply researched, compelling account, far-right fanatics backed by corporate interests schemed for more than 40 years to capture America’s judiciary with far-reaching consequences for women’s reproductive health, voting rights, sensible gun laws and a clean environment. But the battle isn’t over. The courts are on the ballot again in November. At stake are life-time appointments of ever younger extremists, from the Supreme Court on down, who will lock in for generations their radical, distorted and deeply unpopular views of the Constitution. Brock sounds the alarm. Don’t say you weren’t warned.” —James Carville
“…David Brock was once a “right-wing hit man” who authored successful but misleading political attacks on Anita Hill after she testified in 1992 against the confirmation of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court…”
I didn’t know anything about Ginni Thomas, Clarence’s unpigmented wife (CT’s first wife is a Negro) but she sounds like a right down bad’un and so’s Thomas, too, with all the perks he has bagged over the years. Here’s more on the non-admirable Clarence:
https://www.theroot.com/the-messy-life-of-clarence-thomas-the-evolution-of-pt-1849165127
For those of you who got a kick out of News of the World – I sure did – there’s much easy reading on this pair of conservatives.
I agree that for years the litmus test for Supreme Court appointments was Abortion. This was not very productive governance.
So for some time, Republican Chief Executives have always appointed Catholic justices ─ whilst Democrats have always appointed either Jews, Negroes, or “Wise Latinas.”
Democrats dogwhistle about Abortion “protecting” women when they don’t quite have the consensus to push radical DEI and the latest Woke, or their now-open “fighting White Supremacy” and “Hate” bit.
I don’t care about Abortion but I do care about good 2A rulings, and the situation is lightyears better than it used to be thanks to DJT.
Trump was weak on protecting 1A, but let’s get real. The Democrats are the ones pushing for more censorship and Thoughtcrime laws. Gotta fight those hateful White pipo.
Also, the notion that Trump supports extreme anti-Abortion and Project 25 is Libtard nonsense. The idea that he is Jerry Falwell in an orange pompadour is pretty silly.
The courts now leave many of theses matters up to the states which is what should have been true in the first place ─ although nationwide pro-2A rulings that cramp Libtard styles in anti-gun bastions like the People’s Republic of Chicago, California, NY, and DC, etc. are pretty satisfying wins too. Thanks, DJT.
There is a referendum on the current ballot in Arizona that would basically restore Roe vs. Wade ─ but Abortion in Arizona is currently legal up to 15 weeks, so all this does is mollify butthurt Femtard Democrats who think that the Orange sky is falling ─ and they desperately want to best those Rednecks and also open up the border to robust Third World invasion. Hopefully this pro-Abortion measure fails in the state as it accomplishes nothing. And a secure border has always been a popular issue in Arizona until recent Democrat wins.
Justice Thomas has been a reliable Conservative and never been a problem-Negro, and he is old and will not be around for too much longer. I’d love to see a White Nationalist put in there, but that’s surely a pipe dream for now.
Let us not forget that we also dodged a gnarly bullet thanks to the terminally-ill Ruth Bader Ginsberg not retiring when she should have in order to let President Barry replace her with a fellow-traveller soon enough to get it ratified through the Senate before Orange Man Bad arrived.
So we damn near got Biden’s loathsome AG (((Merrick Garland))) seated onto the SC bench for life were it not for Trump.
I’m an atheist and have little sympathy for things that actually would mean going into a theocratic direction. Church and State should be kept separate. Full Stop.
I’m also Populist and Progressive on many things and have little regard for traditional Chamber-of-Commerce Globaloney Shïthead Republicanism.
I think that we CAN tweak these things with local activism if we are not always locked into fighting extistential battles with anti-White Democrats.
And even if we don’t get past Conservative Boulevard, there is a BIG difference between the Conservative justices currently on the bench and the Jews, Sistuhs, and Wise Latinas that any Democrat would appoint in spades if they are let back into office.
“We don’t make progress by losing.”
Also, the other Federal justices are a mixed bag of tricks, with far too many Commies for my liking. We made good headway under Trump, but backslided significantly on this matter with Biden.
Also, Lord Shang makes a good point that even if the Trumpenführer does a great job if elected in 2024, he will be gone by 2028 and so far there is a slim bench for successors which the Democrats will exploit.
Trump might even lose the Midterms if he does not do more than troll Libtards with his “mean tweets,” but I can’t see how it would not be FAR worse with Kamalamala in the office.
Trump is not going to go full Neocon, either. That is dumbässery. The RINOs such as the Cheneys and the Mittmeister hate his guts. I think that based on Trump’s 2016-2021 track record and other factors, that getting into wars for Israel or otherwise with Trump at the tiller is actually far less likely than with a President Kackles.
Democrats have honed the craft of Interventionist War for a very long time, even if the Bushes put Republican faces onto it.
And again, at least 80 percent of Jews always vote Democrat ─ and they want Trump gone yesterday. This is a pretty good endorsement for The Donald even if he is not our guy.
As was noted a century ago in a certain book by an avuncular man with a moustache, the JQ is about the Diaspora and not what diplomats typically call “that shïtty little country that threatens us with World War Three.”
Trump is far less Kosher than probably any Democrat will ever be. My aunt who was McGovern’s DNC Chair in 1972 lamented how the Joos had sabotaged and taken over the lunch-pail Democratic Party.
And the Civil Rights backlash meant Born Again Jimmy Carter and President Bubba. Until Barry Hussein, that is the only way a Southern boy could be seated into the Oval Office after LBJ left in disgrace.
Democrats have been a lost cause since George Wallace. Our only hope is by strident and crypto local activism and by subverting the GOP towards White interests. But we don’t destroy it by helping the Democrats. And if reasonable Christians can help us, great.
😉
There are no White Nationalist arguments for Trump-Vance. What’s Vance done to advance White interests? Nothing. Trump’s record of failure speaks for itself. Trump was involved in ‘alternative politics’ for decades before the escalator ride in 2015. People pimping the guy act like he was ‘fooled’ by the GOP in 2016, but Trump had been paling around with Roy Cohn and Roger Stone for years. He’s not a clown. He’s a fraud and supposedly pro-White’conservatives’ are just unable to quit their hero-worship and pseudo-pragmatism long enough to see thar they’re using Trump as an excuse to be fooled again. Because sustaining their fantasies a little while longer is so much more appealing than getting down to the realm business implementing a serious effort to acquire power and influence.
If there’s no difference between ‘conservatism plus slurs’ and ‘White Nationalism’ then White Nationalism adds nothing to the political-economic landscape for Whites. No ‘value-add’ at all.
There is no ‘White Nationalist case’ for Trump that isn’t warmed over conservatism.
“dissident elements must bide for time. As stated, a Trump presidency prevents a further consolidation of power by the Democrats”
This is the key point. All of the likely results that you describe of continuing Democratic Party dominance are very dire, and need to be taken seriously. It all points towards further, more severe oppression of whites. I understand the frustration with the feckless, sometimes hostile, sometimes corrupt Republicans, but, to reconsider the old saying in a positive way, at least they’re not driving the car as quickly towards the cliff as the Democrats are.
The accelerationists don’t seem to appreciate how likely a societal collapse can go against their hopes. While they might not be pro-Putin, I’m guessing that some of them look at what happened in 90’s Russia and see the likelihood of a sympatico strongman rising. They ignore the real suffering that Russia endured in those times, plus the possibility that things could have gone in other directions, such as a neo-liberal one. In such times, things easily spin out of control, whatever the best-laid plans. I don’t see evidence that those on the dissident right have the discipline and organization that the Bolsheviks had before 1917. And a civil war can end with results even worse than what the USA experienced. The neo-Confederates in dissident circles ought to at least be able to understand that.
With the surveillance capabilities that you noted, including digital banking, digital ID, facial recognition, etc., a new anti-white regime would very likely make China’s social credit system look mild in comparison. Have the accelerationists been paying attention to all of the anti-white words and actions that Democrats have been spouting now, for several years? The Democratic old guard were bad enough. What is replacing them is even worse.
I will gladly vote for Trump. Not because I am starry-eyed about him, but because the alternative is so much worse and intrinsically hostile, and because, despite Trump’s shortcomings, he has proven himself in some positive ways. As many who know him have said, he tries to put the interests of the whole country first. That’s the best we can hope for, for now.
Regarding the way Trump ultimately declined to lock up Hillary, I think that Paul Manafort was right: Trump decided that for the sake of stability, it was best to let it go.
Invoking ‘accelerationism’ is a distraction. The issue is whether Trump is pro-White. He’s not. If you think ‘White Nationalism’ is ‘conservatism plus slurs’ then go ahead and vote Trump. He won’t conserve anything and he’s not going to protect you if you slur jews, but you go right ahead and believe he will.
I’m not interested in “slurring” anyone. I am interested in practical steps which protect white interests and don’t cause further harm. If you have any such practical proposals to share, then some of us would be glad to learn about them. Encouraging four more years of Democratic power in the White House is only going to cause harm, as some of us have outlined. Very likely much more harm than if Trump is in office.
If you want to go down some revolutionary road, have at it. I won’t be joining you. There are more than enough historical lessons to show what sort of damage is caused by revolutions.
My view is that at this stage pro-White ‘practical politics’ should have an immediate focus on state and local offices. Run on ‘good government’ and keep adverse legislation from reaching the floor for a vote. In the medium term, pro-Whites should begin building the infrastructure for nullification of federal authority. The ability of Washington DC to bully everyone is preferentially directed at Whites, but ‘conservatives’ don’t have to hear anything but ‘Don’t tread on me’. Run on ‘good government’ and ‘Don’t tread on me’ and you can get elected by MAGA populists who worship Negros and jews. Then use that power to create a base that MAGA populists depend on.
The issue is whether Trump is pro-White. He’s not.
He is. He just doesn’t have the luxury of saying it out loud. He has to work within a political, legal, social, and cultural framework that all American politicians have to deal with. I’m not expecting Trump to flawlessly adhere to a White Nationalist program. I’m expecting him to steer the country towards sanity. The Democrats want to drive America off a cliff.
I’m not a follower of QAnon or a believer in’4d chess secret messages’. Trump shoots off his mouth about all kinds of things. But doesn’t talk about White people specifically, ever. Vance will mention White people but only in the context of non-White people.
Using your logic, Trump is also 100% supporting the rise of the Reptile People, he just doesn’t have the luxury of speaking to them directly.
If you want to vote for him, go ahead.
But don’t try to sell that he’s secretly pro-White.
If he knew you were ‘pro-White’ and voting for him, he’d reject you.
“Vance will mention White people but only in the context of non-White people.”
Don’t forget, Vance is married to a non-white (Indian) woman. Whatever positive inclinations and attitudes he has toward whites, will be seriously diluted by having mix-race children.
Using your logic, Trump is also 100% supporting the rise of the Reptile People, he just doesn’t have the luxury of speaking to them directly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a3eCHij4Vo
I don’t think Trump is what I would call pro-White. At best he is not anti-White.
But Trump is certainly less anti-White than Kamalamala, and almost any Democrat since George Wallace.
😉
That is not the only way to phrase the inquiry. For example, one could ask, “Which would be better for white Americans, Trump or Kamala?”
The ship of State turns but slowly; we are not going to move from a black Muslim (and his third-term incarnation, Sleepy Joe) to Kaiser Wilhelm in one election. But, fine, if you want another ten million illegals to come into the country while we shovel money and blood into the furnaces in Ukraine and the Middle East I guess you can sit this one out
A conservative would phrase the question that way. But a White Nationalist should not. A White Nationalist should phrase the question, ‘How are Trump’s policies better for Whites than for non-Whites?’
The whole point of pro-White politics is to give Whites a better deal than non-Whites.
If we all get the same deal, it’s just liberalism…I mean conservatism.
We are always just buying more time, eh?
Any NJP or White Nationalists on the ballot?
If so, I would have voted for them.
No offense, but most of these arguments come from Millennials or Zoomers who have never served in the military nor even fired a gun, and they hold contempt for anybody older than them because they have no historical perspective whatsoever and cannot even imagine what survival skills might be necessary just to survive in an atavistic world, say even an era circa 1900.
Edgy Podcasters(tm) are pandering to a subscription demographic of Kaczynski Bros and Hang Gliding-enthuasiasts who simply cannot imagine how bad things can actually get with a true or even a local civilizational collapse.
A Kamalamala Administration would be intolerable to Whites and lead to exactly the acceleration and systematic tyranny, replacement, and lowered mortality that we do NOT need more of in our lives.
At best a Trump loss would be demoralizating, except to our enemies, and it will certainly lead to more icky Leftist justices, Soros DAs, and Negress regime-enforcers like the ones that have been weaponizing the legal system against Trump ─ or anybody not crusading for DEI that they just do not like.
Trump losing will also mean MUCH more Illegal and non-White immigration. That is a priority Democrat goal, and has been for at least six decades.
Decent White people do not need any of that amped up to 11.
Kamalamala and entourage are strikingly worse than the Trump train.
Kamala Must Lose. Full Stop.
Pennsylvania is a swing state ─ and to hear TRS, for example, shilling against Trump and “all those f’king Boomers [probably mostly graying X’ers] with Trump signs on their lawns” makes me doubt their political analysis and maybe their intelligence.
Also, the argument that Trump is more Kosher somehow than Democrat Kamala is complete and utter bullshït. Trump sucks up to Joos ─ which makes good fodder for edgy podcasters ─ but the Joos do NOT reciprocate. They would rather see him gone, baby gone.
If such a thing is possible at at, it would be far easier to get the GOP off the Kosher teat than the Democrats, who have always made political-machine corruption a feature and not a bug.
Also, the nation is still burned out from a generation of Bush/Obama Forever Wars, so I think the idea that a major war is right on the horizon with either candidate, but especially with Trump, is nonsense.
🙂
Invoking generational differences and ‘my gun is bigger than your gun’ is just a distraction.
The GOP has offered nothing to Whites as specific group. Whites are ‘generic Americans’ who have no right to identity, all while pandering to every ethnic group under the sun, especially Zionist jews.
Why should the GOP pay for the White Nationalist vote when they can get it for free?
If all that White Nationalism amounts to is ‘conservatism plus slurs’ all you’ll get is the same results of the last 70 years: More dispossession. More excuses.
Legal immigration is the vast majority of immigration and Trump has said multiple times he intends to turbo-charge legal immigration. The whole focus on ‘illegal immigration’ is a distraction from the reality that immigration in any form from non-White countries is a threat to White rule.
It’s their straw-dog argument, not mine.
I’m not defending the GOP nor Conservatism. My muddy boots seem to indicate that we have already trodden upon this familiar path many times before.
I don’t really care who “deserves” our support; we will lose if all we can do is follow and not to lead.
We need to effectively eviscerate the Mitt Romney RINOs and the Chamber-of-Commerce GOPe that only want cheap labor, legal immigration, low capital gains taxes, and maybe prayer in public school.
Even when Trumpian campaign rhetoric promises these things, the GOPe want him gone, gone, gone.
They want him gone as bad as the Democrat Left does.
If you come from a border state you will know that Illegal immigration is a massive problem that will only be turned up to 11 under Kamalamala.
That is because her coterie wants White Replacemement like no other. They see themselves as crusaders against White Supremacy, and perhaps they have been blindsided by the Trump train lurching unexpectedly out of oblivion in 2016 from America’s whitebread flyover heartland ─ the unsophisticated primordial “salt” who heard Trump’s dogwhistles.
It is a little like Albion rescuing her forces from the beaches at Dunkirk in 1940 when they were thinking that they had already fought such battles a generation earlier and were now mainly ready not for anything else other than to reap the spoils.
This “White backlash” was caused by Trump and nothing else. I realize that overly-Online guys may think that they can meme things into reality, but that is not how the real world actually works.
The Left tend to revere the leaders of their past as pathbreakers who gave them their rights and their snark and who are now “great shoulders” to stand upon. And they don’t have any icky reservations whatsoever about it either, such as whether those broad shoulders were Joe Stalin, Chairman Mao, or Pol Pot. Their revolutionary zeal is pure and ostensibly non-bourgeois, but their imaginations tend to be characteristically limited and we need to exploit that.
Unfortunately, we don’t have all that many billionaires that are not afraid of them in our arsenal.
If Trump managed to build a wall and otherwise to put the brakes bigly onto Illegal immigration, that would be a huge amount of progress, and a major victory that we could parlay to make a compelling case for ending nearly all immigration and many other priorities (probably without Trump).
🙂
If Trump managed to build a wall and otherwise to put the brakes bigly onto Illegal immigration, that would be a huge amount of progress, and a major victory that we could parlay to make a compelling case for ending nearly all immigration and many other priorities (probably without Trump).
If.
Also, the difference between ‘illegal immigration’ and ‘legal immigration’ is a piece of paper. A piece of paper that Trump has said publicly he wants to stable to every immigrant who graduates from a US university.
The whole point of pounding on ‘illegal immigration’ has been to bait-and-switch ‘conservatives’ down the road.
The GOP has not changed one bit at the national leadership level.
They’re still whores for the Chamber of Commerce and the jews.
Vote as you like.
But thinking that voting for Trump is pro-White is just self-comforting.
Always more time. More time to do what, exactly? Is there a single pro-White organization that is training Whites to take an active role in politics or community organizing? If there was value in more time, we’ve had 70+ years already with literally nothing to show for it in the way of practical politics. If we just take the Trump Era as a baseline, what was accomplished with the ‘time’ we had during the first four years? Or even the most recent 4 years when Trump was crashing around in the political sphere?
I don’t wish to be unkind, but ‘time’ doesn’t seem like the problem with accomplishing anything for Whites.
It’s amazing how much hate Nick Fuentes gets when he’s almost single handedly prevented a huge chunk of Gen Z and younger being taken in by Charlie Kirk/Ben Shapiro et el. He really deserves a lot more respect.
Seriously? Single handedly? A huge chunk? I know Nick tries to show up at Kirk and Shapiro’s events to pick off stragglers. Does that constitute a “huge chuck of Gen Z and younger”? I am sure he does something. But this sounds like empty puffery.
Great article!
🙂
Let’s not fight each other over this.
If not everybody is on the Trump train that’s Trump’s fault. He should have kept his promises. He should have appointed better people and tried harder. He should at least have tried hard to protect his supporters when they were wiped off the Internet, instead of holding a fake “Internet summit” that did not even produce recommendations.
If you are speaking up for Trump you are doing something he didn’t want you to have the right to do. I don’t blame people for being unenthusiastic about that.
What matters is that we center and support the vital interests of our race. When someone says, “we have to stop White genocide; do not vote for Candidate X because they are not opposing White genocide,” they are doing the right thing because they are centering and supporting a vital White interest. When someone says, “we have to disempower antiwhitism; do not vote for Candidate Y because they are not opposing antiwhitism,” they are doing the right thing because they are centering and supporting a vital White interest.
This is how we do our best when both parties are conspiring to keep the vital interests of Whites off the political agenda.
We have to fight over this. What’s at issue is whether ‘White Nationalism’ is ‘conservatism plus slurs’ or whether ‘White Nationalism’ is one feature of the working out of revolutionary White racial consciousness in history.
Why would any Concerned White move toward a ‘White Nationalism’ that cannot conceive of a political position that isn’t wake-riding on existing – entirely failed – political programs of ‘the Left’ and ‘the Right’?
People supporting the ‘White Nationalists for Trump’ present their case as though doing so is a ‘compromise’. But a ‘compromise’ requires the other side to make concessions and I cannot see that Trump/Vance has made any concessions to White identity in any form, let alone White Nationalism.
When you ‘compromise’ without receiving anything in return, it’s not ‘compromise’.
It’s capitulation.
Well, I hope that Trump has learned his lesson and doesn’t install his Jewish son-in-law again in the White House “Kitchen Cabinet.”
Btw, Trump has one child who married Kosher. All of Joe Biden’s kids did so.
I simply can’t understand why White Nationalists would even contemplate voting for Mrs. Emhoff.
🙂
The whole “If it’s not literally Hitler I’m not voting for him” argument is silly. Working in the sandbox we’ve been given is the only option we have right now, and constantly losing will not eventually translate into winning.
Trump is the candidate closest to our side in a really long time. Yes, his Jewish handlers are a huge turn off. But he’s also got others who are at least Our Side Adjacent within his circles and we can hope that he listens to them. He’s leaps and bounds better than any alternative right now. I turned in my ballot this week.
You are spot on! Trump cannot win my blue state, so I had my usual freedom to vote for the most prowhite candidate. I almost always vote 3rd party for President. But this time, the selection was so bad that Trump was by far the racially best candidate. Even 3rd party people this time were awful, esp. on race. So Trump got my vote.
From a pro white perspective, Kamala will take away more money from white america than will trump, so we should vote for trump simply for that reason. No taxation without representation!
If the invasion at the border is not completely ended and the border is not firmly barricaded forever, none of our political yapping will mean a thing.
So far, Trump has been the only one to mention deportation of illegal aliens, so that alone gets my vote.
As for the eternal JQ, each of us must get their tendrils out of our pocketbooks by our credit card debt which is held in their hands by usury. It is said that over 60% of Americans are in credit card debt, so who is to blame for that. Cut up your cards and run your own life.
Ramzpaul sez that Racial Politics is a Dead End.
Read the comments if you are so inclined. You may find them to be rather interesting.
Sample: Trump should change his slogan to “Make America Slightly Less Shitty Again.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yv6OaOkLI
LOL.
I understand that propaganda must appeal to all classes and present to all intelligence quotients, but this is wild weird stuff. What did it used to be called, Castizo Futurism?
I don’t dislike RamZPaul, but he is literally the definition of a Cuckservative.
In reading the YouTube comments, we get the usual suspects operating:
RamZ is a Boomer (barely, born 1963) and that is “the generation most susceptible to propaganda” ─ because they watched I Love Lucy and Giligan’s Island (or whatever) on TV? Something like that. I can remember when the networks en bloc started defaulting to color broadcasts in 1965, but this “hyperreality” thesis is laughable.
I was an amateur radio operator, electronics technician, and broadcasting engineer in the before-time when the Internet was still being devised.
Actually, the generations most susceptible to corporate-media propaganda are every one after the last one. Who is it again who frames their reality from the SmartPhone in their pocket?
There are also the usual trolls who think that the 1969-72 Moon Landings never happened. I don’t know about you but I was pretty proud of six landings plus three flybys where human eyes first saw the far side of the Moon.
Negroes and many Social Justice Warriors love this “Capricorn One” argument because no sub-Saharan African country will ever do space exploration on their own, and because they think that the 25.8 billion taxpayer dollars spent for the Apollo program would have been better spent on Negrolatry and gibbs. This sum is about $ 318 billion in 2022 USD.
By way of comparison, Ukraine has been given about $ 175 billion since the Russian invasion so far. Israel received nearly 18 billion dollars last year alone, and they have received several billion dollars in aid every year from Uncle Sambo for as long as I can remember.
The Vietnam War cost over 50 billion dollars annually from 1965. In today’s dollars, the entire “pretend to fight the Communists in Indochina thing” cost nearly a trillion buckeroons.
Below are a few fun YouTube comments on the RamZ Paul video that I swiped.
🙂
Waving the white flag because of the pile of shoes
Sounds like RamZ Saul
“Building our communities”? Whose community?
The overton window has moved right and left Ramz behind. It’s not 2016 anymore, as the country has massively degraded, and crime has skyrocketed. Both will continue, and people will speak out. Change only comes when it’s harder to tolerate the madness than it is to speak out. I always knew this day would come (same age as Ramz, basically).
Ramzpaul is advocating for America to become Brazil?
Whether Trump is a closet White Nationalist or not, the whole left keeps picking at the idea like a scab and won’t let it heal. This means WN is forcibly pushed into the forefront of public consciousness, and the more that happens the more people will acclimate to the idea that maybe Whites do have legitimate interests. But America is the world-city and all politicians must function within that inescapable fact. Whoever wins, WNs must push harder. I belive a Trump presidency will leave more doors open in its wake for WNs to fill the vacuum of decaying power centers than a Kamala presidency would. Collapse is coming, but a collapse itself does not guarantee that what comes after will be beneficial for Whites. Like Wayne Gretzky we are looking to where the puck *will be*, not where it currently is.
That’s well-said.
Accelerationism might work IF (big “if”) there were a radical movement which had an organization capable of mobilizing large numbers of people. Look at the Bolsheviks in 1917. But there is no such movement on the horizon, at least not in the United States. So “worse” turns into ever more worse.
One reason to support Donald Trump is that as long as he is on the political scene, the ruling regime is fragmented as it tries to take down this upstart. And within the ensuing chaos, astute dissident right cadres can maneuver for advantage.
If Kamala wins ( is installed) I will be stocking up on phenazepam.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment