Pedro L. Gonzalez
1,683 words
On Tuesday, Breitbart ran an antifa style dox hit piece against Pedro Gonzalez. The article contained messages from Gonzalez candidly discussing race and Jewish power. But the unfiltered messages we’re supposed to clutch our pearls over are all quite level headed, such as “Yeah like not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are” and “Minorities like me see America for what it is—a country built by whites, that can only survive if whites survive, And it is my job to make whites wake up. Because if they don’t we are all f—ed. Especially people like me.” There’s nothing that is actually vulgar or hateful, just objective facts and reasonable beliefs that are “problematic” in “our democracy.”
Other heresies of Gonzalez include admiring BAP and Nick Fuentes before he went off the deep end, and reading the “Nazi” philosopher Oswald Spengler who actually ended up having major disagreements with the NSDAP. How absolutely dare he read such forbidden books of eldritch knowledge!
Pedro Gonzalez’s dox might be the part of a wider pattern. A few days earlier, the sorry remnants of the Proud Boys instigated an altercation with the Rose City Nationalists, and then attempted to dox some of their members. In the process they appear to have erroneously doxed a random Jewish man as belonging to Patriot Front — which is not even the correct nationalist group. Conservatives lack the weaponized autism of 4chan as much as they lack conviction and class.
Their logic, as explained by Benny Johnson of TPUSA on Twitter was “This is a win, win. Let’s say these really ARE just dumb racist punks. Not welcome. They have no place in our movement. Now they’re exposed. Good. If they ARE Feds, this is a taxpayer funded psy-op meant to defame and entrap innocent Americans. Now they’re exposed. Good. W.”[1]
Perhaps this emerging pattern of conservatives attacking nationalists is a coincidence or from unusually high levels of summer pollen putting people in a bad mood. But in politics things tend to happen because someone willed it, so I suspect it is more likely that somebody from Conservatism Inc. or the Trump campaign issued a directive for total war.
This feels reminiscent of the Spanish Civil War, in which the Republicans allied with the church burning Communists against the Nationalists. This is despite how we on the dissident right have generally engaged with conservatives honorably. Take for example how we heckled Charlie Kirk during the “groyper wars.”[2] We did not dox anybody, and doing so was unthinkable. Instead, we exercised our First Amendment rights to honorably engage Kirk and other intellectual rivals in “the free market place of ideas” which they are always going on about.
I do not want a total war with the conservatives. But if they punch right using antifa tactics and maliciously defame nationalists as feds, then a total war they shall have.
Nathan Damigo has suggested that a solution to conservatives defaming nationalists as feds is to have people infiltrate the establishment and obtain evidence that conservatives are committing defamation with malicious intent.[3] In addition to paving the way to a possible legal victory, this would also be a win in the court of public opinion. This tactic could easily be applied not just towards countering defamation by conservatives, but in countering doxing by them too.
We need to start keeping receipts, as dirty as it may sound. It may offend our sense of honor, but it has become apparent that our enemies, such as Milo Yiannopoulos who has openly bragged about collecting black mail on people, have no honor.
Imagine if anytime one of /our guys/ is doxed, he has a cache of “problematic” messages or recordings by the conservatives who doxed him and/or who are supposed to cancel him. This will result in mutually assured self-destruction.
The source for the naughty messages quoted in the dox seem to be from former close associates of Gonzalez who are now Trump fanatics. If race realism and Jew noticing are truly that awful, doesn’t this make the Trump camp look just as bad, if not worse? It takes little effort to infer that the article’s intent is to retaliate against Gonzalez for his support of DeSantis and criticism of Trump. Apparently, some of Trump’s most fervent supporters had no qualms about being close friends with a “problematic” heretic. Conversations require multiple parties by definition.
This tactic should mostly be reserved for select individuals, since doxing is equivalent to a war crime in the culture war, as it targets not just opponents, but also the families they provide for.
But there may be entire organizations which deserve a blanket fatwa against all of their members, such as Breitbart. Anyone who continues working at Breitbart implicitly endorses doxing other right wingers through their conduct, and therefore like antifa, are fair targets for doxing.
To those who doubt this tactic’s efficacy, consider how Pedro Gonzalez, alongside Tucker Carlson’s canceled top writer Blake Neff, show that our ideas are spreading. I would estimate that at least half of young white males notice Jewish power and race realism, or at the very least play in the kiddie pool with our ideas through memes and irony instead of running in the opposite direction towards “decency.” We have plenty of potential sleeper agents to recruit.
Along with plenty of agents, we also have plenty of targets. Many establishment conservatives make anti-Semitic remarks. We know this because everyone complains about his boss.
In his dox, Gonzalez is quoted as saying “Kirk thinks and acts like the worst kind of Jew,” “And he is in fact beholden to Jews.” It is inconceivable that Kirk does not know about the Jewish Question. And while Kirk is not publicly a race realist in our sense, his Tweets about black violence and criminality since the vehicular terrorist attack in Waukesha are fairly adjacent to what one would find from American Renaissance or The Justice Report. Its not inconceivable that he has said some feisty things about blacks in private.
But I am not suggesting that Charlie Kirk or his staff be doxed. He has not engaged in doxing as far as I know, and he is currently doing more good than harm despite not being our guy. I sincerely hope that he is not doxed, but if he is, that hypothetical presents a whole other angle of attack: doxes that catastrophically backfire.
If he was doxed as making non-kosher comments, would Charlie Kirk go cry in his safe space? At some point, people are simply too big to dox. Kirk’s bosses might have the money, but Kirk has the respect of legions of young people. Kirk could spearhead a schism between the based and cucked factions within TPUSA, and he would most likely come out on top. The end result might transform TPUSA into the white nationalist organization the Left claims it is. When doxing starts to backfire, it will deprive the Left of one of weapons they have relied on the most.
Pedro Gonzalez, along with Blake Neff and the numerous doxes of quality people that came about from Identity Evropa, shows that we nationalists provide critical talent. While it is true that every radical must eventually make his peace with the establishment, the inverse is also true: the establishment will have to make its peace with the radicals.
One of the iconic quotes from Fight Club is “Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not f— with us.” For addressing the conservatives, I would modify it to “Look, the white nationalists you despise are the people you depend on, we intern for your politicians, we volunteer for your phone banks, we go door to door during election season, we run your local college republican and TPUSA chapters. Do not mess with us.” We nationalists can be your best friend or your worse enemy, and our numbers are steadily growing. If we are not given a seat at the table, we might just flip the table over completely. Choose wisely.
Pedro Gonzalez’s dox has a good chance of being one of the first to catastrophically backfire. It lends more credibility to our ideas than it hurts him. He is already thanking people on Twitter for their support. And from one of his quotes, it seems like he felt the day he was purged was inevitable one way or another.
If the DeSantis campaign and Chronicles Magazine defenestrate Pedro Gonzalez, he will fall into our welcoming arms. I’m sure he would be welcomed as a speaker at a Counter-Currents or American Renaissance conference — and without any of the demeaning pandering that Conservatism Inc. displays towards non-whites.
This illustrates another point, which is that the supposedly race blind conservatism of the establishment is nothing but Jewish supremacy. This is shown by how the establishment is perfectly fine with identity politics, such as Blexit, for everyone except whites. Meanwhile, they treat white identity politics as the worse possible evil. Qui bono? Not the other races. As Gonzalez observed, they’re better off in a white majority country.
White Nationalism isn’t just spreading among the white youth. It’s also spreading, or at least being accepted as a valid position, by non-whites. While being cool and sincere has gone a long way in bringing this about, the main reason is that White Nationalism is about promoting the well-being of our race, unlike the Jews who aim to manipulate and exploit all other races.
Whatever happens to Pedro Gonzalez, I don’t see him putting on a small hat and going on an apology tour to Israel — not that the Judeo-conservatives would even allow him to. But he is welcome to join our phalanx where he will find outstanding friends and allies. If conservatives want to cancel talented people, let that be their loss and our gain.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
Notes
[1] https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1672983178103980032?s=20
16 comments
Gonzalez’s fawning support for DeSantis flies in the face of his J-naming. DeSantis is going out of his way to be even more pro-Jew than Trump.
So it seems as if Gonzalez either: 1) is a clout-chasing, dishonest schemer with no true convictions or; 2) changes his mind very quickly.
Every major candidate will support Jews anyway. He might as well get behind a serious politician who can get things done, instead of the over-promising, under-delivering Trump.
I was thinking the same thing.
The first time I ever saw anything by Pedro was about a year ago, and he tweeted something about how the USA is a white country, and it has both a right and a duty to be majority white. I was initially impressed.
But in recent months, you’re right that he appears to be a strong supporter of DeSantis — someone who is of zero use to whites and our country.
He’s probably another non-white grifter — like Candace Owens, Larry Elder, etc
Deciding whether Trump or DeSantis is more beholden to Jews is like trying to decide whether Cthulhu or Yog Sothoth is more eldritch. They’re both bad in different ways.
The other big questions for me is who could cause more chaos for the establishment and accelerate radicalism, along with who could implement better policies for whites. I don’t like Trump but he would cause a liberal meltdown. However, DeSantis might be able to pass better policies for us- albeit he will face some similar issues like an entrenched bureaucracy. Furthermore, MAGA has become a personality cult with too much Qanon insanity.
Trump seems like the best, or least bad decision to me. To Pedro it seemed like DeSantis. Some of the DeSantis support is subversive and astroturfed, but there is a contingent that is sincere such as Ann Coulter, who along with Pedro bring up reasonable criticisms of Trump’s severe personality disorders and betrayal of his base. He obviously sees the J6ers as nothing but a political football to manipulate for his own gain. Plus let’s not forget da Platinum Plan, Chris Wray, or his pardons of blacks and Jews but not whites.
I’m still leaning more towards Trump simply for the chaos he could bring. However, Pedro’s dox makes me more likely to consider switching to DeSantis or doing a write in for Teddy Roosevelt.
Teddy Roosevelt—now there was a president. Probably my second favorite next to Andrew Jackson.
I support Pedro 100%. His campaigning for DeSantis is bothersome, but so is the campaigning for Trump by others. My guidepost is “who stands up for whites?”
Gonzales does speak up for us. Specimens like Rod Dreher and the National Review crowd do not.
Me, too, though I also strongly support DeSantis, and, indeed, seriously question either the legitimacy or the intellect of any self-styled “prowhite” who is not supporting him. He would not only by lightyears be the best President for white preservationism, he promises actually to do some good for our cause – and unlike Grifter Trump, he has a real record of getting things done. To denounce DeSantis because he has to suck up to Jews (ever been to FL?) is just churlish and childish in the extreme. The only way we make any progress within the System is to pit one faction of our competitors/enemies against another, constantly moving the political football towards the endzone, even if we have to do that a yard at a time. DeSantis is the only candidate promising to end illegal immigration, including birthright citizenship.
If a Jared Taylor (who himself is rather quiet on the JQ) clone were to run for office, his chances would be negligible. You have to judge candidates not on how much they suck up, but on the substance of their policies. Right now, DeSantis is literally the ONLY person proposing policies that advance the prowhite agenda, however minimally. EVERY other candidate is openly awful (except Trump, who has already, however, proven himself incompetent and unserious).
I definitely see your point. If you asked me a couple of months ago I would have disagreed, but after some time to digest what’s currently available, I largely concur.
Personally, I am no fan at all of DeSantis. His recent stunt of literally flying to Israel to sign a bill which limits our freedom of speech was literally traitorous in my eyes. However, if he’s serious about deporting all illegals, closing the border, and ending birthright citizenship, he would essentially bring us back to 1986 demographics, and that would give us a tremendous victory in our ultimate quest to save whites and white countries altogether. Then it will be up to us after that to finish the job.
If he had to suck up this badly to the Jews one more time in order to make this Happen, I will begrudgingly accept it. Not one other Republican running outside of DeSantis or Trump has anything whatsoever to offer whites (or American at all) and none have indicated they would do even 10% of whatever Trump and/or DeSantis would pursue. If anything, the others would be just as harmful as Joe Biden, or very close, anyway.
The real test on whether or not to get behind DeSantis over Trump will be when they get on a debate stage together. Both have recently said they will deport illegals, end birthright citizenship, and finish the border wall, but we need to hear how they’d do these things in clear detail, AND it’ll give an opportunity for both of them to “top the other” in order to win voters. In other words, Trump could say he’ll aggressively do all 3 of those things, and DeSantis could counter with “Oh yeah, well I’ll do all 3 of those things AND I’ll sign a LEGAL immigration moratorium for 20 years!” If that’s the case, we need to absolutely get behind DeSantis over Trump.
We will know for certain after they both fight for the nomination, as it will be one of them in the grand scheme of things. But I agree that currently, DeSantis has the upper hand. Absolutely.
Pedro has written about white genocide in Chronicles. Has any other person writing outside of overtly prowhite sites or publications like CC or TOQ ever done that? Pedro cannot be a white nationalist, but he is certainly an honorable ally.
It has backfired tremendously in the comments of Breitbart. It is baffling to see how MAGApedes and Desantis shills have put aside their differences to see the negative utility of Jewish power and Antifa tactics. Suddenly the DR3 posts and all usual talk about elections and even Trump himself are nowhere to be found. People are realizing this isn’t about elections or personalities anymore. Kudos to the hard-working trolls patiently sidestepping notorious censorship to productively spam relevant info in the most anti-intellectual website around for years because it is finally bearing fruit.
It feels like the dam is breaking. I even question if the author himself of that ‘takedown’ was giving Pedro Gonzalez a nod, given how sympathetic it makes him look from beginning to end. It seems like the usual bandaids and diversions aren’t working anymore to steer the goyim noticing back into useless elections. It’s as if ZOG has done too many unforced errors in nailing Trump to a cross as he is still the GOP frontrunner by miles and would absolutely lose to Biden legitimately because he is clearly a spent force. People sense it even if they can’t articulate it.
Cuckservatives are completely untethered right now for the first time in decades. There is no fallback option. The past 3+ years have destroyed their adoration for any sort of law enforcement, medical establishment or electoral integrity, also hastening the decline of church attendance. The Trump regime shut down CIA-backed Islamism long enough for the goofy evangelical crusade to be forgotten about, and thus Christian Zionism too by also exposing via the Abraham Accords that Arabs are all in cahoots. They overplayed the LGBT thing, having already assimilated nearly all of it in less than a decade, but then forcing the next rung too quickly. All that’s left is a recrudescent homophobia, antiwar isolationism, xenophobia etc opposition.
It’s so bad even some adjacent races (mestizos) are cucking their own people to simp for whites, even as their race has the momentum.
Has anyone else seen Roseanne Barr’s video where she denies the holocaust and says Jews are the cause of the world’s problems? How seriously should we take it? Thoughts?
It was a joke. Here’s context. I’ll be writing about the whole silly kerfuffle, as well as whether some topics are “never funny,” for tomorrow’s feature.
Thank you for clearing that up. I shouldn’t have gotten my hopes up.
Oh boy, Breitbart. I remember being a daily reader in 2016. Though I hated their transparent zionist Jew angle which inevitably crops up in every controlled Alt Lite (or Kosher Right) outlet, the comment section told me its readership lay well to the right of its editors, so I was lulled into a false sense of belonging, knowing to simply ignore all the site’s reports on Israel. Even so I gradually stopped reading after Bannon was ousted (remember the HuffPost headline? “Goy-bye!”) and the place became even more subversive. I like to think I was always the level of savvy or “redpilled” I am today, but I’ve actually come a long way in just a few years. Even when we think we’ve reached the end point of our political development there’s always progress to be made, and it’s good to take stock once in a while.
I watched Pedro on Tucker.He was willing to push the issue of anti-Whiteness the furthest of any guests on the show.He named the evil and spoke out against it.I like DeSantis better than Trump,because I think Ron could remain much more focused and accomplish things(look at Florida).I am very disappointed with Breitbart(They have a long history of Jewish infiltration and pandering).The CEO at Breitbart is Larry Solov(another Jew),the senior editorial writer is South African Jew,Joel Pollak.
Before counter-currents it was the Intellectual Dark Web for me , i.e., about 4 Jew intellectuals among them . I was OK with that . They hit on my main gripes concerning intersectionality, xenophile restriction and higher math . I do get the Jewish Question when it is presented in a certain way however being a Gospel Person [esoterically] I can’t go the whole nine yards and say F them all so I see “the Jewish Problem” more as a aphorism .
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.