Huckleberry Finn’s father is such a towering, terrifying figure of American literature, it’s a wonder no one’s ever built a drama around him. Maybe we should put together a one-man show: Pap Finn Tonight!
Like that Mark Twain Tonight! entertainment that Hal Holbrook wrote when he was at Denison University in the 1940s — and then kept revising and reviving to moderately amused audiences . . . for the next 70 years. That is, until 2017, when he was 92, and decided to take a rest and focus on more serious dramatic roles. Mark Twain Tonight! had begun as a jokey college project, but over the decades it turned into a tidy nest egg. We all remember Hal Holbrook from TV shows and movies from recent decades. The Firm, from 1993 and starring Tom Cruise, is what always comes to my mind. But actually Hal’s career didn’t take off big time till he was, like, 45. Or maybe 50, when he played Deep Throat in All the President’s Men in 1976.
But in the meantime, he kept doing his Mark Twain thing. Mark Twain Tonight! was a honey of a property because it required no supporting cast, practically no props, and no rights-clearance at all. All Hal Holbrook had to do was edit and recite stuff that the great man himself had scripted for endless lecture tours in the 1890s and 1900s. It seems Twain had gone bankrupt from numerous crazy schemes, and needed to make his fortune back.
All this was on my mind many years ago, when I was with a comedy troupe in the 1980s and actually did write a piece called Pap Finn Tonight! This was just a five-minute skit, an obvious takeoff on Hal Holbrook, though slightly edgier. I seem to have conceived it around the time that Vanessa Williams, our first black Miss America, was shamed out of her crown when Penthouse ran some old nudies of her. Williams was on the cover of People magazine around mid-1984. In my conception, this magazine is what sets old Pap off. He picks it up and waves it around, and does some drunken raving based on his actual rant in Huckleberry Finn, when he’s taken Huck to the cabin and he’s all whiskeyed up. Something like:
They call this a govment? Oh this is a wonderful govment, wonderful. What’s this nigger doin’ on a magazine cover? Oh they say she’s a free nigger. So free she sells naked pitchers of herself. What’s the country a-coming to? I know about these free niggers. One o’ them wouldn’t-a give me the road if I hadn’t shoved him out of the way. I says to the people, why ain’t this nigger wench put up at auction and sold? They call that a govment?
At this point, the audience should be really alarmed and intrigued by Pap. Now the “Stage Manager” comes out, he’s dressed in a black suit and a top hat like the Mute in The Fantasticks, and he stage-whispers to Pap that it’s time get off. Pap berates him the way he berates Huck:
Why ain’t you a sweet-scented dandy? You got top hat, clean suit. I never seen such a son. Why, there ain’t no end to your airs. I’ll take some o’ these frills out o’ you before I’m done with you. I’m a-standing about all I can stand now. So don’t gimme so sass . . .
During this last bit of monologue, the Stage Manager has gone to get his crook. He hooks Pap around the neck and hauls him off the stage as Pap continues to rant. Exeunt.
As a very short, broadly comedic number, the skit bears some similarity to the “Royal Nonesuch” entertainment we read later on in Huckleberry Finn. That’s when the old bald guy with the white beard — the “King,” the one who claims to be the Dauphin of France — paints himself in multicolored spots and stripes, and for a minute or so cavorts naked on all fours before an audience of Arkansas yokels who think they’ve come to see a grand theatrical offering from Edmund Kean. (I could tell you what happens next, but that might be a spoiler.)
My Pap Finn Tonight! was never produced, alas. Because — well, just because. When we did our Sunday afternoon script readings, jaws dropped. I think my colleagues missed the humor, mainly because they just didn’t know Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. They couldn’t relate to its manic outrageousness. Back around 1980, SCTV did skits about poor, starving Okies in the Depression, and they were entirely based on the film version of The Grapes of Wrath. They were hilarious if you knew the source material, but mean and mystifying if you didn’t.
But Pap Finn Tonight! has had a long afterlife in memory. One of our company, who decades later would win an Emmy Award for writing a politically-correct comedy show about two colored guys, would laughingly complain to me: “Every time I move, every time I have to go through all the scripts we have — there it is, staring at me, right on top of the pile! Pap Finn Tonight!”
Ironically, I myself haven’t seen a copy of my script for many years. I was just improvising up above. In the course of a half-dozen transcontinental and trans-Atlantic moves, most of my files and juvenilia went up the spout.
In that old troupe — which shall remain nameless, because a lot of these people still have careers and families — I not only wrote scripts, I was a performer and built props. We performed in downstairs- and upstairs-cabarets in Manhattan, sometimes on TV. Our live sketches were interspersed with video segments, because a lot of our work was simply not feasible on a live stage late at night. For instance, we might have a big number set at an amusement park, and we needed a genuine roller-coaster in the background. Well, you just can’t build that on the stage at the West Bank Café on West 42nd Street (a favorite venue, where our compère was the young and ever-pissed-off Lewis Black), so we put televisions on the side of the stage to show the video skits. It was professional-quality video, because one of our number ran the audio/visual department at AT&T. I’m giving you all these details in case you ever want to run a comedy cabaret yourself.

You can buy Tito Perdue’s novel Cynosura here.
I was particularly fond of my Chitty Chitty Bang Bang sketch, which was all video. This had a car-front prop I built out of posterboard and acrylic paints. The premise here was that Ian Fleming’s famous kiddie book was also his greatest James Bond story. In one scene we have the 007 character in bed post coitum, smoking a cigarette, asking Chitty in a Sean Connery voice, “Was it goood for yoou?”
I pushed the envelope whenever I could, and so my scripts were often shot down as too risky and offensive — for example, Tard School, a script for live performance. This was a takeoff on Dale Carnegie courses that teach nervous losers how to present themselves smoothly and make themselves likable. Maybe even “Make Friends and Influence People,” as the saying goes. I was attuned to such things because I had no social graces whatsoever, and nearly signed up with Dale Carnegie. But I had this theory that most retards were like the rest of us. And so, instead of teaching them to make brooms or whatever, we should teach them to recite a script, put up a big front — present themselves as outgoing, friendly, articulate people. “Hey, I’m glad I’m here, I’m glad you’re here!”
I still believe this was a brilliant idea, and should be implemented in the teaching of the mentally retarded. Life is mostly an act, after all. Sincerity is something you fake. I grew up near a posh boarding school for the retarded, the Devereux Foundation, and we often used their grounds and buildings for parish barbecues and scouting events. We’d occasionally run into some of the inmates, or students, or whatever we called them, who were mostly from rich, often celebrity, families. They weren’t all that feebleminded or helpless. They were just inept. Maybe a bit spastic, perhaps autistic, though we didn’t know about autism then. What these kids — some of whom looked to be 23 — really needed was the Dale Carnegie touch. And that was the moral of Tard School.
It nevertheless frightened the pants off a couple of our folks — specifically, the one-and-a-half Jews in our company. This surprised me, because I’d have expected such folks to dig its offbeat wackiness and faux humanitarianism. But that’s asking for too much. Their problem was simply that my script was about . . . retards. They’d apparently received some ukase from the Community Relations boys, telling them never to mention the feebleminded in a humorous context. So even in the mid-‘80s, certain subjects were being declared verboten. The fact that I’d probably had more experience with retards than most of my colleagues wouldn’t have really carried any weight, so I didn’t argue the matter.
* * *
When I was little, a cousin of mine was given a box set of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, a lavishly illustrated (by Donald McKay) pair of editions that Grosset & Dunlap originally brought out in the 1940s. I think the Book of the Month Club was giving them out as a subscriber bonus around 1960. Said cousin received the books from his grandparents, who later asked if he enjoyed them. Always eager to please, he responded that he particularly enjoyed Huckleberry Finn because Pap Finn would get drunk and beat up Huck — just like his own father beat him up!
I believe this was an accurate description — the parent did indeed say things like, “I never seen such a son,” though with better grammar. But it must have caused a lot of embarrassment and further abuse in that family. Confusion, too, because this drunken father would completely black out on what he said or did, and honestly had no memory of it.
My cousin was seven years old at the time. His father had read Huckleberry Finn when he wasn’t much older. The character of Pap Finn had thus embedded, insinuated itself into the father’s mind way back in 1929, and it came out spontaneously when he was intoxicated and encountered his little son.
“Why ain’t you a sweet-scented dandy?” — there were remarks like that, too. This was not a family tradition; they didn’t all go around channeling Pap Finn, swilling rye and beating each other up. The abuser’s father was in fact a very gentle, if somewhat remote, corporate executive and engineer. It’s not true that abusers were all abused as kids. Abusers might abuse just because they can.
Was Pap Finn a role model for child abusers? It sounds absurd. He’s such a terrible loser, drunk and dirty and determined to grab the fortune that his son somehow lucked into. (Huck owns $6,000 in gold in 1839 dollars, because of treasure he discovered with Tom Sawyer in the first book.) But strange things can come out when people have a load on.

You can buy Charles Krafft’s An Artist of the Right here.
A question that’s easier to answer is where the hell Pap Finn came from. If he was 50 years old in 1839, then he was born in about 1789. One somehow doubts this birth was in Philadelphia, Baltimore, or Boston; and Missouri would be highly unlikely, as it wasn’t even a state until 1820. Pap was most likely born in a western territory, perhaps along the Ohio River in the future states of Ohio, Indiana, or Kentucky. And how did he come to be in a small river town in Missouri? (“St. Petersburg” in these books, presumably based on Twain’s hometown of Hannibal.) Was there a billet for Town Drunk that Pap decided to apply for?
No, the likely answer is that Pap is just an old Kaintuck. A onetime boatman from the flatboat days, before steamboats came to dominate Mississippi travel in the 1820s and ‘30s. Goods traveled down from the Ohio and Mississippi rivers via flatboats. The boatmen got to Natchez, or New Orleans (after Louisiana became part of the Union), sold their goods, and then pretty much had to walk back north via the Natchez Trace, through Mississippi and Tennessee. Pre-1820 these boatmen largely came from Kentucky, hence they were all called Kaintucks. If Huck was 14 (my estimate) in 1839, then he was born in about 1825, right about the time that the flatboat-sailors were being phased out in favor of the new steamboat trade.
Pap most likely washed up on the Missouri waterfront in the 1820s. Presumably he married, and worked odd jobs till he was just too sorry and drunken and unemployable. Mark Twain, aka Samuel Clemens, would have seen such people in riverfront towns when he was growing up.
Huck’s mother died somewhere along the line, probably when Huck was very young, as neither Huck nor Pap make mention of her. Then Pap went away, following the promise of a job, a few years before Adventures of Huckleberry Finn begins. Then he heard rumors that his abandoned son came into a fortune, and so Pap comes right back to St. Petersburg.
And that’s his story, near as I can make out. Pap Finn Tonight!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Note
Article illustrations by E. W. Kemble, Edward Ardizzone, and Donald McKay.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Flannery O’Connor’s Mean Words
-
-
Elspeth in Wonderland
-
Remembering Frederick Charles Ferdinand Weiss (July 31, 1885–March 1, 1968): Smith, Griffith, Yockey, & Hang On and Pray
-
The Cartos, Imperium, and The Truth Seeker — Remembering Willis Carto: July 17, 1926–October 26, 2015
-
The Rose from Pennsylvania: An Interview with Margot Metroland
-
Colin Wilson’s The Angry Years
-
Orwell and the Angries: A Listicle
8 comments
I just read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn for the first time this year after the realization that as a man approaching 42 there are too many classic novels that I have never read. Now I’ve read my fair share of them, but the list of those unread is ten times that. Both books were absolutely wonderful and reaffirmed my original intent that these works are classics for a reason and you need to read them for your own self-growth. I was surprised at the barbaric treatment of Huck by his father, but then lamented that countless children have been and are still subjected to that kind of abuse by someone who should be nurturing and protecting. For all of the humor and lightheartedness at times in the book(not to mention the genius use of first person narrative), The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is pretty sad and tragic as well. I look forward to reading it to my girls some day.
Very small pedantic matter that I had to climb in and un-correct in the article above: the name of the book is Adventures of Huckleberry Finn…not The Adventures…
It’s a thoroughly terrifying book, except for maybe the first three and last three chapters, which are mainly Tom Sawyer garbage. Twain had absolutely no mastery of plot. He could never have done detective stories or hack movie scripts. He created characters, and they would just run away with the story, like Don Quixote.
But the subplots in HF are totally wild. After Twain put the beginnings of the ms. away for 8 or 10 years (he composed it on a newfangled typewriter, just for fun), he brought in the characters of the Duke and Dauphin, who sent the whole story into a loopy stratosphere.
At a time when some people thought SNL was “too edgy,” either of those sketches would have caused those sorts of people to have strokes.
Huck Finn was based on an actual kid, though as far as I know, nobody investigated his real life. So it’s rather interesting to see some backstory on what went wrong with his family.
I read Huckleberry Finn in high school and enjoyed it. I don’t think it is required reading anymore.
“Pap was drunk as a fiddler,” is an amusing line that has stuck with me all these years.
It was enjoyable to see this minor character displayed, and I also liked the illustrations provided. A shame more novels aren’t illustrated anymore. Pap could also have been from Tennessee, as many Missourians made a distinct line from the Carolinas to the Mississippi. I grew up in southern Missouri, and my family came from Tennessee.
I remember when I was in fifth grade our teacher would read Huckleberry Finn to us, her voice steady and warm, and yes, saying “Nigger Jim” with no hesitation at all.
I always thought a film about Tom and Huck twenty years later would have made an enjoyable film. I would see Huck as a Federal Marshal out west, Tom as a Senator or Congressman in hot water but finessing his way out, married to Becky. Has possibilities.
Interesting thing about “Nigger Jim.” The author never uses that expression. Huck refers to “Miss Watson’s Jim,” or I think on one occasion as “Miss Watson’s nigger, Jim.”
Throughout the book, “nigger” is a word used as a social marker, a vulgarism. Quality folks don’t say it. Even Huck doesn’t say it, after that once instance.
That’s the real proscription against the word. It’s not because it’s mean or prejudiced, it’s because it makes you low-class.
So you want to ask, where did we get this notion there was a character named “Nigger Jim”? I think it’s entirely from Ernest Hemingway, in his famous 1935 essay, saying all American literature comes from Huckleberry Finn. You’ll be hard-pressed to find the full essay online!
I believe Twain wrote some sequels, completed or fragmentary. Those might be worth a look.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment