The Foremost Threat to Life on EarthJames Dunphy
Elon Musk insinuates that investing in SpaceX is good because colonizing Mars can be a hedge against something destroying life on Earth. This seems like far-sighted wisdom, but Musk often frames things as a forgone conclusion to induce people to invest in his businesses. For example, he has stated that people should invest in Tesla because it is on the forefront of developing self-driving cars, which he claims will inevitably become the norm.
Before that, he claimed people should invest in Tesla’s electric cars because we’ll eventually run out of fossil fuels and need to run things on electricity.
He has also claimed that humans should get on board with transhumanism — specifically, nanotech endeavors to upgrade the human brain — because otherwise, according to him, machines will render human beings obsolete.
He’s always claiming people should invest in his business ventures because whatever his business is doing is either necessary to forestall doom or will become the norm someday, so we should give him millions of dollars (rather than another businessman) to oversee it. Of course, it is not necessarily true that Musk’s ventures are the best way to achieve these goals.
In Musk’s latest attempt to encourage investment in SpaceX, he suggests something could jeopardize life on Earth — but doesn’t say what. Then he claims people should invest in SpaceX so he can build a colony on Mars to hedge against Earthling extinction.
This got me thinking as to what the biggest threat to life on Earth is. For me, the answer was immediate and obvious: Sub-Saharan Africans are doubling in number every 30 years. There’s a billion of them now; there will be another billion three decades from now, and four billion total by 2092. They’ll all be striving to enter Western nations. After enough decades or centuries of immigration, they may in fact transform them into something like modern South Africa and elect someone like Jacob Zuma, Julius Malema, or Robert Mugabe to be at the helm of a nuclear arsenal.
Mixed-race blacks such as we find in North America, Jamaica, and in Southern Africa (the last being mixed between Bantu and Khoisan people) have the highest murder rates and among the highest rates of psychopathy. Unlike Hispanics, they have among the lowest IQs. The sweet spot for misuse of guns is stupidity, rashness, and malice, and mixed-race Negroids excel in these categories more than other races. The same qualities that make a person misuse guns may make them misuse nukes. There’s probably a ten-fold increased risk of nuclear holocaust once such negroes inherit nukes given that this is the same multiple by which they’re more likely to commit homicide.
Pure black West Africans commit far fewer murders on average than mixed-race blacks. Most whites in America learn they are much kinder than African-Americans on average, but after they enter societies like the United States and the United States, they’ll interbreed with the locals and become mixed-race blacks. Then they’ll probably start murdering people at higher rates as well, as their sort of unstable hybrid DNA animates the Negroid form to its worst actions.
While the future, based on the current Negroid population trends, looks scary, the current situation isn’t all that reassuring, either. If all people currently in the US interbreed, they’ll be genetically on par with Puerto Rico or Colombia (equivocating East Asian DNA with Amerindian DNA). This is what North America will become without additional immigration. With more immigration, North America will continue to exchange white blood for black, Asian, and Amerindian blood. The US will thus transition from being the genetic equivalent of Puerto Rico to a blacker and more Amerindian Panama. Neither political party is offering a way to stop this. The only difference between the Republican and Democrat parties on this issue is not one of results, but only of timeframes. With Republican immigration policy, the US may not become like Panama until, say, 2080; whereas with Democrat policies, it will be racially equivalent to Panama by perhaps 2065. It’s not a question of whether the decay will happen, but of how fast.
Mixing between whites, Asians, Jews, and Arabs may create a people I call “neo-Jews.” They will be smarter than the disproportionately Hispanic and black masses. They may act as an elite and retain control of America’s nuclear arsenal, but with enough centuries of black mass immigration, mixed-race negroes may depose them. Of course, blacks have let cities like Detroit fall into ruins, and perhaps before they can get control of nuclear weapons they’ll let them fall into disrepair as well — but there’s a chance a skeleton crew of neo-Jews will foolishly keep them going until a black dictator can use them. They may be stupid enough to preserve nuclear weapons for the brown people who will replace them.
If whites want to stay collectively white — which data shows 90% of them do in terms of choosing someone with whom to start a family — then they’ll need to retake the entire continents of Europe, Oceania, and North America. The reason is that seceding in only portions of these places will leave open other areas to be overrun with blacks, and history tells us that for genes to spread, people need not live side-by-side. They can instead radiate out incrementally in the form of mixed-race individuals between populations. Admixture may take millennia, but it usually happens. Modern travel methods make interaction easier and will speed it up. A continent of white nations is the best option for long-term survival. This doesn’t mean that breaking off incrementally isn’t a first step, but it shouldn’t be a final goal.
If there’s nothing to fear from negroes armed with nukes, then the status quo is fine. If there is something to fear, then we have two options. One is to promote nuclear disarmament in nations where negroes may immigrate — namely, the US, the UK, and France. This probably won’t happen, though, because their resident elites want to retain nukes as a deterrent against invasion from Russia or China. Still, if these nations disarm themselves, they can eliminate the risk of negroes ever being armed with their nukes in the first place.
The second option, which does not exclude the first, is to stop negroes from immigrating to the UK, the US, and France while stopping them from multiplying in Africa so there won’t be so many who try to immigrate.
There are a few steps we can take to ensure negroes never get control of nuclear weapons:
- Promote the development of robot technology in jobs negro immigrants are taking, wherever possible.
- Convince non-whites, including Hispanics, Asians, North Africans, and full-blooded black people such as Haitians and Africans, to oppose mass immigration to the US, UK, and France, because it may eventually lead to violent, low-IQ, mixed-race negroes getting control of nukes.
- Promote nuclear disarmament in the US, the UK, and France. Even though these nations’ Jewish and white elites and their probable Hispanic and Asian successors will probably never let that happen, it’s worth trying, because it’s good to hedge against mixed-race Negroids of the future inheriting them.
- Because all nations armed with nukes are either multi-racial or non-white, homogeneously white nations such as Poland cannot depend on having their allies’ nuclear weapons as a deterrent against invasion unless they develop their own weapons or else ally with another homogeneously white nation that does. Hence, if they want a guarantee of protection from invasion, and thus existence, they will need to develop their own weapons.
- Get the United Nations and other organizations to set aside billions of dollars for teaching Sub-Saharan Africans how to use birth control so that their fertility stays at or below replacement levels. If Afro-Caribbeans and African-Americans can figure out how to use birth control, there’s no reason Africans can’t.
- The final step is for good white people to outbreed bad ones. The 20% or so in the US who are amenable to white identity politics need to have an average of 4-6 kids each. Assuming that white couples who don’t care about white Identity have only 1.5 kids — which is what they’re doing now — then within 80-110 years, or by 2100 to 2130, their descendants will constitute four to five times more living whites than the descendants of other whites. Hopefully, by that point the tables will have turned and whites lacking ethnocentrism will be the 20% minority. My hope is that this new breed of whites in Western Europe, Oceania, and North America will be as sensible about mass non-white immigration as Eastern Europeans are now. They’ll probably have fewer traits related to factor 1 psychopathy and more related to higher intelligence and higher testosterone levels, and will be more introverted, as all these things correlate with higher levels of honesty — which is sort of the opposite of political correctness. What’s more, by selecting for these things they can ensure they don’t devolve into becoming as bad as negroes.
Negroes armed with nuclear weapons is the foremost threat to life on Earth. Because of their lack of intelligence, the only way they can get them is by flooding into nations that do and then voting themselves in power. We must therefore stop them from flooding into such nations and persuade them to stop multiplying, so there won’t be so many who want to immigrate.
Even if blacks never choose to blow up the world, they’re never going into space — at least not without some genetic edits, which are easier said than done. So before talking about going to Mars, we need to stop mass immigration of Africans throughout the world.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
I’m not really certain what the point of this essay is. Sure, given the many “what-ifs” necessary in the future scenario you paint, blacks with nuclear weapons would be a problem. But that’s only in addition to the other few million problems that would result from blacks becoming the majority in Western countries. And quite honestly, if whites are so idiotic as to allow themselves to become a minority in every one of their countries, I’d prefer the world to end in nuclear holocaust than continue on into whatever future would follow.
As a non-Insider, I haven’t read the post, only the opening paragraph. But if Musk really believes that Mars colonization could be self-sustaining in the absence of a connection to Earth, then I really would NOT invest in Space-X, as he clearly is either stupid or very ignorant. For someone in his business and with his background, he should know better. Mars cannot support human life indigenously. A Mars colony would require a huge transportation lifeline to Earth.
It will be millennia, if ever, until real space exploration and colonization begins. Perhaps there will one day, in a few centuries, be a lunar colony or two, if lunar mining should prove economically viable. But otherwise, the scale of space is so great, so far beyond any currently conceivable technologies to navigate, that, as the great (and rightist) population ecologist Garrett Hardin once put it, for countless future centuries “Earth is our birthplace and will be our boneyard.”
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.