2,418 words
Royal Air Farce
As seasoned military historians will know, many of Britain’s Royal Air Force (RAF) pilots during the Second World War were Polish. Today, however, those plucky air aces from a country that historically has been more warred against than warlike (and so know how to defend like furies) would find no place for them in the RAF, and they would be unlikely to get their wings not because of any aerial incapacity, but because they are the wrong color.
The RAF have taken a bit of a break from hiring white men, and the public sector in general is sounding like an eerie echo of the sign often seen in rental properties in Britain’s inner cities in the 1950s and ‘6os: “No coloureds, no dogs, no Irish.” Only now it’s “No whites,” and it’s the RAF and not a bed-sitting room in Walthamstow.
Of course, this is a racist, exclusionist policy which is both gathering pace and not confined to the RAF, whose members famously pronounce the acronym as though it were a noun — as in “raff,” as in “riff-raff,” and as in what the air admirals clearly think white men are.
If the Battle of Britain were to be fought today, the Spitfires’ camouflage would be compromised by the rainbow livery they would be forced to wear; pilots and ground crew would be warned against calling the Luftwaffe the Hun, Jerry, or Bosch for fear of causing offense and being “branded racist” (now more serious than treason); and comic-book fighter pilot Biggles would have to display his personal pronouns on the cockpit of his “kite.”
This is the point at which journalists generally write, “But, joking aside . . .” But if you do that, what are you left with? A disgusting betrayal of “the Few” immortalized by Sir Winston Churchill, the risk that putting sub-standard flyers up there in planes considerably faster and more lethal than Hurricanes would inevitably entail, and proof if proof were needed that Great Britain is no country for white men.
Women are, of course, also to be the beneficiaries of the creeping crawl of equity. But given that “woman” is a word now defined by ideology and not biology, that essentially means anyone who says they are a woman can reach for the skies. Indeed, a transgender “woman,” particularly a black one, would have a considerable advantage at the interview stage.
The only white male Second World War pilot who might have, as it were, stood a chance of joining today’s RAF would have been Sir Douglas Bader, who didn’t let a little thing like losing both legs in an aerobatics crash in 1931 stop him from retraining as a pilot in 1939 and going on to shoot down 22 enemy aircraft and probably more, as some were unconfirmed. He would, of course, be accepted nowadays because of and not despite of his disability.
Uncivil Service
You can sense when there is a British election in the offing because Conservative politicians who are nothing of the sort start pretending they are. Granted, this is not a general election, but Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak have made it to the Conservative Party’s leadership election penalty shoot-out (with Truss the favorite to win), the victor in which becomes party leader, and therefore by default, Prime Minister. There will be much muttering on the Left — and therefore in the media — about the new PM being unelected by the voters, but only by those who don’t fully grasp the British constitution, which would be more or less anyone on the Left, who don’t tend to do knowledge.
The party with the most seats in Parliament is the one whose leader has to stroll round to Buckingham Palace and ask Her Majesty if they can form a government, and that remains the case with a mid-term handover of power. It would be a marvelous end to her reign if this time Queen Elizabeth II replied to the incoming PM, on being asked if Royal permission were being granted to form a government of the nation, along the lines of, “No, you bloody well can’t. Now bugger orf, you oily little tic.” We can all dream.
But if the United Kingdom’s ruling party changes leaders between elections, they are quite entitled to do so. The Tories could elect David Beckham as leader if they so wished, and he would be PM. British readers will remember Gordon Brown taking the helm from Tony Blair. Or perhaps you would rather not, and I apologize for spoiling your day.
But the seasonal gesture from “Tories” to try to shell-game the British electorate into believing they possess even one strand of conservative DNA is par for the course. Primary candidates in the United States are currently up to the same type of thing, with Democrat hopefuls telling everyone in their nauseating campaign videos about how dumb an idea they think Biden’s student debt forgiveness is, despite the fact they almost certainly voted for it. Good luck with that, by the way, American economy. The words straw, camel, and back leap to mind. Essentially, it means many people reading this will be paying off the Gender Studies degree for a man you don’t know, but who has a girl’s name and a curious hairstyle.
But back to the UK. Liz Truss, who clearly wishes to be the new Margaret Thatcher in the same way Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson wanted to be the new Churchill, has promised to trigger the infamous Article 16 within days of her taking over captaincy of the Titanic — sorry, the Edmund Fitzgerald; sorry, the country — and to reform the notoriously Left-leaning civil service, the minions who put into effect whatever fever-dreams are dreamt up in Cabinet meetings at Downing Street.
So the Civil Service has preempted the likelihood of Truss clearing out the woke stables by going on a hiring spree intended to safeguard and even boost the diversity and inclusion jobs the likely next PM is targeting, or is pretending to target. Woke is not an academic fad any more; it is government policy. I have pointed out in prior episodes, probably ad nauseam, my belief that the UK’s current dysfunctional death spiral (and that ofthe West as a whole) is intentional, and a malevolent hybrid of two flowers of evil: Sam T. Harris’s anarcho-tyranny and Russian defector Yuri Bezmenov’s four-stage program to destroy a nation from within. Diversity and inclusion are key components in this toxic mix. Hopefully, the Civil Service will follow the lead of the RAF fly-boys/girls/don’t knows and stop hiring white men.
Black mischief
Marvel comics. Lost in Space. Sneakers. Tom & Jerry. The electric guitar. Sense a connecting thread? All of these were American imports into the UK which lit up my childhood. The US of A used to glow in the dark for us when we were kids. Britain was, to a certain extent, as black-and-white as it looked in the movies, while America was the Technicolor land of cultural razzmatazz, and we wanted it like we wanted ice cream. Sadly, today, not all imports from Stateside are as welcome.
Oxford Street is London’s Fifth Avenue, and is where people come to shop — or, increasingly, shoplift. Footage — can you still call it that? — of a pack of kids openly looting shops (which is what the British call stores) in Oxford Street went what the young people call viral. That is quite appropriate in this instance, as what we are watching resembles a virus, and one which is spreading rapidly.
The “youths” are, it almost goes without remarking, black, and their target is an interesting one. The main store swarmed in the video is called Candy World (another Americanism, as the British still call candy “sweets”), and the spirited young tearaways are therefore not attempting to liberate electronics to sell at a profit. Then, what are they doing stealing candy? As is almost always the case, they are dressed in doubtless expensive clothes and training shoes (another American import we could do without, except for purposes of training) and so can obviously afford candy. What they are doing is showing the rest of us that they can do what they like with a word they wouldn’t understand: impunity. The police, naturally, did not attend the fracas, undoubtedly busy choosing outfits for the next pride march. Also, since George Floyd died resisting arrest thousands of miles away from London, British police have been reluctant to get tangled up with blacks. Justice, law and order tend to take a back seat to protecting your job and pension
Meanwhile, Nottingham was the legendary home of Robin Hood, but this is more robbin’ in the hood. A video of another gang of urchins stealing from a Nottingham McDonald’s (the less said about that American import the better) prompts the same question: Why bother? The answer remains the same: because they can, and it shows who has the power.
This will escalate as feral blacks and the white teenagers who mimic their “dress sense,” accent, and behavior will become emboldened by the lack of police interest in their attacks. There will be a lot more of this. The workers in the establishments attacked will do nothing, and why should they? Why risk getting stabbed for minimum wage? I have myself seen areas of London where black kids are the predators and everyone else the prey, and that was ten years ago. Now, the wildlife just got wilder.
Go south, young man
The Scots are invading England, but these are not tribes of fierce and blue-painted warriors led by Mel Gibson. What Scotland now has in common with Albania is that they are both sending their unwanted to be rehoused by the ever-generous English, who everyone hates right up until the trash needs taking out.
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who Nigel Farage named as the “single most unpleasant leader I have ever met,” has said publicly that there will be a “national initiative to ensure every council has the homes they need and to guarantee the legal rights of everyone in Scotland to a safe home if they find themselves homeless.” When any politician uses a term such as “national initiative,” then, as they say in the Mafia movies, you know someone’s going down. And they are. Down to the Auld Enemy across the border.
It seems harsh that, as well as ferrying the contents of the Maghreb and Albania across the English Channel to despoil Kent’s countryside before mooching on to London to join in enthusiastically in the capital’s thriving drug trade, England may now have to put up with the roving and erratic drinkers of Glasgow — because this is what Sturgeon is mooting — but it serves to prove a point which should not really need to be proven again.
The mainstream media are always accused by the dissident media of hating Britain. This is a scurrilous misrepresentation. England, yes, but all the other tacked-on bits get a pass. The BBC only ever uses the word “England” if they have a bad word to say, but Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are hallowed turf.
To their immense credit — and they have always appeared to me to be a worthwhile and non-partisan charity — Shelter are the ones sounding the warning bagpipes. It is pathetic when charity workers are the ones informing the rest of the populace about government policy and the governments themselves have nary a word to say on the matter. Nevertheless, Scots without a roof over their red-thatched heads will presumably be singing, “Ye take the high road and I’ll take the low road and I’ll be in England afore ye.”
Ticking the boxes
The National Museum Wales (NMW) is, like all good national archives, partly an art gallery. And some of the paintings hung there are so wonderful, such perfect examples of the Western — and therefore white — artistic tradition of oil and canvas, compared to some of the rather more contemporary and often disgusting textile surfaces artists favor today, that they must be subverted and made ugly. Naturally, then, this is what the NMW have gone ahead and done.
I had no idea who Anthony van Dyck was, but the faithful Internet informs me he was “a seventeenth-century Flemish Baroque artist,” and that sounds good enough for me. He is unlikely, one comfortably assumes, to have made his art using tampons or urine. In fact, he was a landscape and seascape painter, and a painting of his showing Wales’ Caernarvon Castle hangs still in the NMW. The problem is that you can’t really see it as well as you used to be able to.
The reason is that another artist, Carwyn Evans, has had an “installation” of thousands of self-assembled cardboard boxes (“installation” means “non-art,” by the way) placed right in front of the painting. You can see Evans’ genius at work here. I’m no art critic but, like a pedestrian in San Francisco, I know shit when I see it and try my utmost to avoid it.
One of the cardinal rules for the progressive is to despoil anything beautiful, and the reason is that it is usually the produce of white people. Ugly is the new beautiful.
It’s just their culture
If you know anything about the so-called “grooming gangs” in Britain you will also know two things: that those gangs were and are Muslim, and that the epicenter of their atrocities is a horrible northern town called Bradford. If you haven’t read Peter McLoughlin’s Easy Meat you should, although it is a tough read.
It seems appropriate, then, after its name has passed into the vernacular, that the city of Bradford receive some sort of national accolade. And so it has. Britain always has a “city of culture,” in place for a year and supposed to represent the best the nation has to offer. Bradford will wear the laurels in 2025.
It’s perfect: British culture will be represented by a city which should be best known for gangs of misshapen golems whose DNA is Pakistani and Bangladeshi, clearly the result of first-cousin marriages, and who have systematically raped thousands of white schoolgirls. Pakistan and Bangladesh are two of the world’s most disgusting countries. How nice that Britain is culturally appropriating from such leaders among the nations.
Here’s to the monarchy!
The Union Jackal
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, paywall members have the ability to edit their comments after publishing them. At Counter-Currents, every man can be an editor! (The edit option ends when the comment thread closes. Currently, that is in 100 days.)
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will also have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram chat group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Good Loving Gone Bad: Nic Roeg’s Bad Timing
-
Unmourned Funeral: Chapter 4
-
The (Soviet) Union Jackal, August 2024
-
Unmourned Funeral: Chapter 3
-
I, Suetonius: Art Over Ideology
-
Served Cold: The Fateful Consequences of Going to Dinner Parties – Part 3
-
Unmourned Funeral: Chapter 2
-
Unmourned Funeral, Chapter 1
22 comments
Pakistan and Bangladesh are two of the world’s most disgusting countries.
Going by this moronic logic, every White nation should also be declared disgusting since Whites have been bombing schools, wedding and funeral processions, homes full of families, sodomizing prisoners at secret locations around the globe, etc., for the last 50 or so years. Also, now that non-Whites are well-entrenched in White societies, it is, therefore, time for some sweet revenge; every White, whether young or old, man or woman, is fair game.
Thankfully, I don’t hold this position because of my cultured upbringing and mental constitution. I don’t tar every White with the same brush. Nor do I indulge in schadenfreude when I see them getting cornered or terrorized in their own domiciles.
I don’t hold any personal animus towards Mr. Gullick.
I hope he reconsiders his vacuous generalizations and realizes that there are Pakistanis like me who feel as much disgust towards these immigrant scum as White Britons; perhaps, more.
Your cause has morality and seriousness on its side. Cheap rants and tirades erode both of them.
BTW congratulations on 75 years of independence for Pakistan. “Pakistan celebrated 75 years of independence on Sunday (Aug 14 & 15th) with official ceremonies in all major cities.” Originally I couldn’t understand why the separation from India but now I’ve come to see that each people are entitled to their own culture and civ. Including of course white people.
@Nicolas Bourbaki
Thanks.
As for the need for separation, firstly, what we refer to as “India” was a geographically fractured entity. Hundreds of sovereign princely states dotted the whole territory. The political center of gravity i.e. Delhi was more an Imperial (Turkic, Mongol, Afghan, and then finally British) measure than something natural or organic. The centrifugal forces remained extremely powerful. They still are despite relentless pressure from the administrative-bureaucracy [a colonial legacy] that operates from Delhi.
Secondly, by the 20th century the north-western part of the Indian subcontinent had already developed a distinct socio-political outlook. It was majority Muslim, contiguous, and heavily Persianized in its literary output. Also, the mighty River Indus provided ample cultivated land for sufficient food production and economic activity. It was bound to have political autonomy.
Thirdly, the British colonial administration created a class of local intermediaries that, because of its access to Western literature, drew inspiration from various European nationalistic undercurrents. When it, then, tried to tweak the local social equation under those alien doctrines, the consequent reaction took many forms. Mobilizations in the name of religion and tradition vitiated the already delicate and sensitive civic environment. The colonial high-ups only exacerbated the situation with their deceit and cunning. They and their local loyalists lacerated the polity of Indian subcontinent. Some of the wounds are still festering.
Lastly, Pakistan manifests a kind of protest against the insistence that Delhi is the undisputed politico-cultural center of Indian subcontinent; and that power must converge on that point. And it doesn’t matter whether the occupant of the throne at Delhi is Hindu or Muslim, Brown or White.
Another great article, but UK readers need to know that Shelter is not a politically neutral charity. It is part of the woke left, as a quick look at its website will confirm. The home page features a black woman and black teenage girl, so it’s reasonably accurate in confirming the charity’s priorities as well as not trying to strain credibility too far by suggesting that there might be a husband/father on the scene. It has a black woman as head of diversity and its latest annual accounts claim that it is committed to becoming an actively anti-racist organisation.
I would urge all UK readers to avoid Shelter and other such organisations and to ensure that charitable giving is directed to organisations which are at least not actively ant-white.
Yes, indeed, I also flinched at the mention of Shelter being some kind of worthwhile charity. I doubt they’ve ever successfully rehoused anyone. Went for help once as I had neighbours (young Spaniards) in the flat below that would hold parties 6 days a week until the small hours and I was out in the streets until 2 or 3 in the morning. Then they would blast music in the mornings. By that time I was a bag of shattered nerves and was slowly losing my mind.
I was told not to make myself homeless, as the council would not consider me. I got no help but I think I might have gotten a form to fill in through the post, asking me to rate how well they’d done.
I no longer step into any of their charity shops
Thanks M.A. for the brief synopsis
“Pakistan manifests a kind of protest against the insistence that Delhi is the undisputed politico-cultural center of Indian subcontinent; ”
This is a problem which our (USA) founders tried to avoid with Washington, DC not having voting rights. Other countries, often in Latin America, Mexico, Panama, Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, etc., have this problem.
Brazil (Brasil) wisely avoided it by building their capital: Brazilia out in the middle of the wilderness.
Of India I’m primarily interested in the “Independent States” or maybe the “Princely States” period. This was preceding British rule and I think may date from the Hellenistic era (ca. 300BC) up until around the 1700’s. I must confess to not knowing much of this era tho. Any good book references would be appreciated. Also I like to collect historically interesting old coins and thus need to know the history before looking for any coins.
@Nicolas Bourbaki
The following are some of the links that would be helpful to gain a familiarity with the history of Indian Subcontinent.
R. C. Majumdar
Jadunath Sarkar
Romila Thapar
Irfan Habib
Five Thousand Years of Pakistan
Ancient Pakistan
In addition to all this, I have some research articles and books in PDF format. Some of them also pertain to numismatics. If you use telegram, my telegram address is >> @MuhammadIzadi . It can be sent via that route.
Regards
By the beard of the Prophet! If Bangladesh and Pakistan are such wonderful places instead of being, like every other Muslim country, famous only for inbreeding, corruption and bestiality, why did your fellow Allah-Botherers come to the filthy decadent pork-eating West?
To call Pakistan and Bangladesh (and, by extension, the simian creatures that inhabit those countries) “disgusting” is to pay them quite a compliment. Disgusting doesn’t begin to capture the essence of those open sewers – or their denizens.
@Sherman McCoy
Ask those [mostly compulsive hedonists and materialists] who have come to your shores. I am neither answerable nor responsible for their actions. Deal with them as you see fit. It is your business not ours.
Still, in my view, filth attracts filth. Perhaps, if Western territories hadn’t been such dens of debauchery and sensuality, they wouldn’t have attracted these low-lives.
Reclaim your lands, restore their dignity, and make it tough, hard, and painful for global scum.
Lastly, try to converse in a respectful manner. It is not that difficult.
My mother grew up in Bradford. She told me to never tell anyone that Bradford was her hometown. And she grew up in the 1950’s. So it’s had a terrible reputation for decades.
Easy Meat by Peter McLoughlin was pulled by the American Amazon.
It WAS there because several reviews linked to it. But if you follow the link it goes to a PAGE REMOVED notice.
As George W. Bush explained, they hate us for our freedoms.
It’s not a “racist” policy, it’s anti-White. We have to stop using the language of our enemies.
“It’s not a “racist” policy, it’s anti-White. We have to stop using the language of our enemies.”
Absolutely right.
The British would not have had all these problems (or most of these problems) if they had been smarter/wiser in 1939-1941 and had not fought against their European brothers Germans for the interests of non-European non-brothers Russians and Americans. But some Englishmen/women still think that they have “won” in 1945.
Damn!
A completely original take I’ve never seen before…of course its basically the anti-White narrative “you deserve it for x” only from supposed pro-White nationalists. Maybe Germany shouldn’t have invaded Poland (I’m aware of the endless nigger-like apologetics for everything Germany/Hitler did being neccessary/acceptable), maybe they should have dealt with the Bolsheviks in WW1 which they could easily have done, maybe, maybe, maybe…
Any British person with sense knows WW2 was a bad pointless war, I’m personally aware of no one that thinks it was worth it, this includes my mother who I stopped trying to convince how bs the holocaust narrative is. At best people rightfully feel pride in British peoples reponse on the home front, I wish that spirit was still a thing.
That´s not about who is guilty and who is innocent. One should know the errors and failures of the past for not repeat them in the future.
Every peoples have their mistakes in the history. For example, it was wrong when our great batyr Edige/Edigu joined Aksak Timur in his struggle with Tohtamys Han, and so the Great Ulus was destroyed. Wrong choice. We cannot correct it, because it was in the 14th century. Ukrainian Hetman Chmelnicki has had his own wrong choice, when he asks Russia for help in his struggle against Poles. It is not possible to correct, because it was in the 17th century.
To whine or sob about it is of no use too. But we have to remember our own mistakes and failures, and to learn from them.
“The British would not have had all these problems (or most of these problems) if they had been smarter/wiser in 1939-1941 and had not fought against their European brothers Germans for the interests of non-European non-brothers Russians and Americans”.
Exactly.
Interesting article which goes over a wide range of issues. I’ll comment on just the RAF aspect of it all. My Dad, incidentally, was of Polish ancestry and joined the US Air Forces during WW-II {then called the Army Air Corps}. He flew bombers; B-17’s and B-25’s during the war and became an officer then. He served in the Pacific theater.
To give the RAF “a run” (i.e. competition) for the title of ‘Most Wokened Service’, the US Armed Forces are also heavily pushing Diversity* in recruiting efforts. I don’t think they’d even take Poles at this point. Recruiting is apparently at an all-time low {ref needed} but fortunately, the Diversity*, “Our Greatest Strength”, more than compensates for the lack in numbers.
*To clarify, Diversity means “no white men”. Thus a force of entirely Black people would also be 100% Diverse, although this might seem counter-intuitive to the uninitiated.
This past week one of the News outlets ran a story that incidents of “sexual assault” experienced a sharp spike in our US Armed Forces. The super-brainiacs working at our Pentagon ascribed this to after-effects of leaving the Pandemic. Given that the Armed Forces were not isolating during the pandemic, I’m not entirely certain of the logic behind this explanation. The article did mention that the timing was unfortunate: coming at a time of low recruiting, low morale, and more public distrust of Government institutions.
An Unawokened would almost be tempted to think that the lower-IQ, uninhibited POCs now making up a larger % of our military were causing this. Almost…
Unless something has passed me by, David Beckham is neither an MP nor a peer, so could not be elected/appointed to any ministerial position, regardless of whether he led the Conservative party.
They would make him a lord just for the goal against Greece.
Sam T. Harris’s anarcho-tyranny
You meant Samuel T. Francis.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment