Counter-Currents
On the Murder of Sam Collington: The Liberal Snake Eats One of Its Own
Spencer J. Quinn
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner
2,497 words
The murder of Sam Collington has the normie in me raging against my dissident self like Norman Bates in a dress.
On November 30 in Philadelphia, a 17-year-old black criminal named Latif Williams shot and killed Collington, who was a white and devoutly Marxist 21-year-old college student. This little news item has put my alter-egos in a tizzy in part because it’s the perfect example of ideology eating itself. A dogmaboros, if you will.
First, you have Collington, who was more than just another soft-headed, liberal undergraduate. He was also an activist in training, a passionate Bernie Bro, and a person who worked with city commissioners and state senators to advance a far-Left agenda. This is how Chris Black of Investment Watch describes him:
An anti-White BLM-supporting communist activist who campaigned for criminal justice reform and against “White supremacy” was killed by a Black man in a mugging in Philadelphia. This took place on Holodomor remembrance day, which he had mocked just hours earlier.
I cannot verify the part about mocking the Holodomor, but the rest of Black’s assessment appears to hold up after a deep dive into Collington’s still-active social media accounts. Collington seems to have been a true believer in Leftist ideology who wandered off the plantation only when attending Free Palestine rallies or retweeting people who claim that Zionism equals White Supremacy.
Collington also retweeted Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner back in August. In it, Krasner asked a court to hold the Philadelphia Police Department in contempt for withholding officer misconduct information. Since it was Krasner’s indulgent attitude on black crime which led directly to Collington’s murder, I’m sure the irony here is lost on no one. (More on Krasner later.)
Judging from the outpouring of sorrow on social media over his death, Collington certainly was more than just a popular guy. Dare I say it, but he seemed genuinely appreciated among his peers. The comments reflecting on his passing are too numerous and heartfelt to seem like generic me-too’s jumping on the grief wagon. One person actually crafted a portrait of Collington in order to commemorate him.
Of course, nowhere among these sympathy tweets and condolences are people connecting the perp’s race to the high rates of black crime. It’s as if Collington had been hit by a bus or succumbed to cancer. The tragedy of his passing is all his friends can talk about, and the very idea that his murder could have been prevented if not for the pro-black, anti-police policies that Collington himself supported is utterly verboten. It’s not like the Eloi sat around and complained about the Morlocks, after all.
Second, we have young Latif Williams of the 75 IQ who lives down to all the negative stereotypes that blacks have earned for themselves in the West. Here is Ralph Cipriano’s reporting in Big Trial:
Williams’s first arrest dates back to November 2017, the month he turned 13, for robbing a college student on the Temple campus of a cell phone, in addition to assaulting her.
Although he was arrested for that robbery, there is no record of the resolution of that case, which may be due to the age of Williams.
On July 20, 2019, Williams was locked up for selling drugs. On Aug. 21, 2020, the D.A.’s office under Larry Krasner withdrew the charges against him.
On May 31, 2020, during the George Floyd riots, Williams was arrested for burglary, rioting and looting. According to the police, Williams kicked a police car window out and spit on the cops.
On Sept. 18, 2020, the D.A.’s office under Larry Krasner withdrew all those charges against Williams.
On Nov. 6, 2020, Williams was arrested for selling drugs. On Sept. 10, 2021, the D.A.’s office under Larry Krasner withdrew those charges.
Need we say more about Latif Williams? He’s about as interesting as a condyloma on the underside of humanity. In a just society, he’d be swinging from the gallows right about now.
Finally, we have Larry Krasner. If anyone can find a better reason for why we have anti-Semitism, I’d like to hear it. As Philadelphia’s District Attorney, this Jew has made it his top priority to defend the interests of black people, squabble with the police, and oversee an increase in crime and murder in the City of Brotherly Love. He was elected in 2017, partially as a result of the $1.7 million his ethnic kinsman George Soros dumped into his campaign coffers. He has sued the Philly Police Department 75 times, as if cops are a more pressing problem than criminals. Furthermore, he’s not terribly interested in enforcing the law.
According to the Daily Mail:
Under Krasner, the future years of incarceration have been cut by half, and the length of parole in probation supervision have been slashed by nearly two-thirds compared to the previous DA.
Krasner, who previously defended Black Lives Matter and Occupy Philadelphia protesters as a lawyer, has clashed with the city’s top cops over his reluctance to prosecute non-violent gun and drug possession crimes, despite a surge in gun violence and rising homicide rates in the City of Brotherly Love.
As of November 21, 2021, there have been 491 homicide victims, a 14 per cent increase from last year’s number of 436, and 283 in 2019.
Looking at Williams’ rap sheet, if Krasner had prosecuted him for non-violent drug possession, Collington would most likely be alive today. But does Krasner even care? The whole idea behind prosecuting non-violent crimes (especially sinister ones such as illegal gun and drug possession) is to send the message that violent crimes will be prosecuted even more harshly. But by going soft on non-violent crime, he’s enabling these non-violent offenders to have contempt for the law. As a result, they keep at it until they eventually do become violent. And only then, in classic Keystone Cops fashion, will Krasner’s DA office be relied upon to act.
Krasner’s big idea is to fight crime at its supposed source, by first addressing the real issues: underfunded schools and high poverty rates. Again, according to the Daily Mail:
‘Yes, enforcement is a small part of the story,’ [Krasner] told the Inquirer earlier this year. ‘The big part of the story is not that. The big part of the story is this city’s chronic failure to invest in prevention that the community is crying out for. That is where we have to go.’
Krasner’s office has argued that there is little evidence that suspects accused of being in possession of guns are responsible for the uptick in gun violence, considering that the recent surge in gun-related arrests has not resulted in a significant decrease in shootings.
You can buy Spencer J. Quinn’s novel Charity’s Blade here.
This is mere sophistry, of course, since gun-related arrests won’t result in a decrease in shootings if the DA lacks the will to prosecute. And who gets to decide what “significant decrease” means in this context? Wouldn’t any decrease in shootings be a welcome change? Meanwhile, murders are skyrocketing in Philly, and Krasner has shown no desire to change tacks. Therefore, we must assume that, in Krasner’s calculating mind, a record number of dead bodies is an acceptable price to pay for Progress — as long as the dead bodies don’t belong to Jews, presumably. As of December 1, that number has reached 510.
To make this story even more sordid, Municipal Court judge Joffie Pittman lowered Williams’ bail for his May 31 arrest to “$200,000 unsecured,” according to Cipriano. This means that Williams didn’t need to pay any money to stay out of jail, although he was ordered to remain under house arrest. Then, on September 30, Judge Martin Coleman granted Krasner’s motion to withdraw all charges against Williams. Both Pittman and Coleman are black.
This story is instructive for multiple reasons, and when looked at in a certain way, it can reveal pathologies on the Left, center, and Right.
For one, the Left’s head-in-the-sand response reveals its moral bankruptcy and leads one to the dogmaboros idea. This response is best exemplified in a tweet by Collington’s friend Douglas Leake, in which, in effect, he doubles down on Leftism:
So, again, Progress supersedes life and limb, even if that life and limb belongs to someone close to you. The Left continues pushing its agenda out of sheer inertia or out of an a priori hatred for those who push the opposite agenda. Either way, the facts on the ground have nothing to do with it, even if people on the Left suffer as a result. This is how the Leftist snake eats itself.
Of course, dogmaboros does not apply merely to Sam Collington’s murder. One need look no further than the Great Terror in the 1930s Soviet Union or the Chinese famines of the late 1950s and early 1960s to find examples of Leftist dogmaboros which far exceed anything found on the Right.
For a more centrist perspective, one could look to the conservative Powerline blog. In his December 1 article, Paul Mirengoff recounts how Krasner’s soft touch on crime has led to more crime in Philadelphia, and then declares the whole situation “sickening.”
Embedded in Mirengoff’s analysis, however, is the assumption that Collington himself would have agreed with him had he been presented with the facts. He wouldn’t have. Further, Mirengoff fails to consider Collington’s absolute devotion to a pernicious and anti-white ideology which most likely destroyed over a hundred million lives less than a century ago. Who knows? Maybe Krasner and Williams did humanity a favor by taking out a future mass-murdering commie? This is highly unlikely, of course, but it is possible, and remains ground where conservatives like Mirengoff fear to tread.
Mirengoff:
There’s a twist to the Williams case. His murder victim was, according to a friend, a “devout Marxist” who “would not want his death to be used to push any sort of right-wing pro-police agenda such as stop and frisk.”
How about prosecuting repeat criminal offenders? Is that a “right-wing pro-police” agenda item?
I don’t know the victim, but I suspect that, Marxist or not, he might want thugs like Williams to be prosecuted before they commit murder. It’s bad enough to be mugged by reality without being murdered by it.
Yes — prosecuting repeat criminal offenders is part of a Right-wing, pro-police agenda — especially when those repeat offenders are black. Furthermore, Collington wouldn’t have wanted “thugs like Williams to be prosecuted before they commit murder.” How could anyone assume that a person as committed to the Left as Collington was would ever want that? It is an axiom on the Left that all races are equal and that blacks are an oppressed race. Consequently, their criminal activities are viewed as a reflection of this oppression and not the result of some genetic defect, as many on the Right (myself included) contend. The best way to reduce black crime would therefore be to not oppress them at all. This logic is counterfactual and self-defeating, but it is consistent if one assumes racial equality as an article of faith, which all Leftists must do.
Unless you have an intellect on the level of Christopher Hitchens, odds are that once you’re trapped in the dogmaboros of the Left, you’ll never escape. The only way out is to be shown the lie behind racial egalitarianism. And this is something that most conservatives are too afraid to do.
Finally, we have the Right’s reaction. As one would expect, schadenfreude is the word of the day when it comes to Sam Collington. Many were relishing the irony and finding the whole situation hilarious. And on this account, boy, did Gab deliver:
Of course, my sympathies are with the Right, and so I believe that the irony and poetic justice behind Collington’s murder cuts closest to the truth. Why should anyone mourn a person eaten by the very beast he helped feed? And knowing how vicious our politics have become, why shouldn’t we dehumanize this little shit Collington and laugh at his untimely demise? Is anyone on the Left presently not doing this over the peaceful January 6 protestors who are still languishing in DC gulags after eleven months? Is anyone on the Left ever shy about doing this over any misfortune which befalls the Right?
Civil war is coming, and perhaps it is best to keep our hatred of the enemy honed nice and sharp at all times. Our very survival may one day depend upon it.
But still, the normie in me just won’t stop raging. Upon reflection, I seem to simultaneously be sympathetic to all three perspectives: Left, center, and Right.
After digging through Collington’s social media, he strikes me as deluded, but well-meaning. He didn’t seem like an antifa type, and his posts were completely devoid of bile and calls for violence. He just seemed like a genuinely nice guy who happened to be entranced by bad ideas (how many of us does that describe at age 21?).
Further, I have to give this kid my surprising respect. I am fairly certain that if I had been gunned down at age 21, you would have been able to count on one hand the number of people my age outside my family who would have been truly aggrieved by my departure. The fact that Collington could inspire such an outpouring of compassion among his peers means he must have been doing something right when he was alive. And he deserves credit for that.
And as for the schadenfreude and laughter coming from the Right, people should keep in mind the old Russian saying: “Beware the traps you set, should you fall in them yourself.” What we see in the Collington affair is the age-old malevolent collusion between Jews and blacks against the interests of whites. This is nothing to laugh at. Yes, they clipped one of their own this time, but next time, it could be any one of us. And then they would be doing the laughing.
I’d also like to think that the Right should be trying at all times to win over folks who haven’t yet been dogmaborosed. Yes, we have the truth on our side, but that’s not enough. In fact, sometimes it makes us complacent. We should always try to present our ideas as moral, factual, and commonsensical. Schadenfreude doesn’t do this. Public expressions of schadenfreude, while tempting and good for morale, will win no converts. Imagine Leftists expressing it over a law-abiding gun owner who accidentally kills himself with his gun. Would this cause anyone on the Right to support gun control? If anything, it would cause us to hate the Left even more. This same calculus applies to the Collington murder. If we stay on point more and laugh less, maybe we’ll be more persuasive in the end.
Finally, I find myself agreeing with Mirengoff as well. The whole affair is sickening. I’m so sickened by it, in fact, I can neither cry with the Left nor laugh with the Right. I just wish I had had the chance to meet Sam Collington before he got trapped in the Left’s insidious dogmaboros. Then I would have shaken his hand, engaged him in debate, and done everything I could to change his mind.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
40 comments
A well-meaning person is not the same as a good man; there is a difference between one who is wise and good, and one who is foolish and friendly.
I am sorry to say that a man was killed by his own beliefs, but if this is not taken as a wake up call for “normies” on the consequences of actions, how are we supposed to convince more converts. A conversion is an experience and deeply personal, all in the DR know this; instead of focusing on social media campaigns, memes and the like, we should focus on infrastructure.
This Collington was a victim–to be sure–but he was a willing participant in the exchange. I (and others like me) are awakened to the reality of liberalism, socialism, Marxism and the system; this is experiential and not easily transmissible to large masses.
Ultimately, when war does arrive, the Centrists and the softer edges of the Left and Right will be forced to fight for one or the other. As Christ himself said; “You are either against me or for me.” We should take that advice and apply it to our struggle.
A centrist is a fence-sitter, they take no side because they lack any sort of religious conviction. They are “sickened” and “shocked”, but cannot take action because of a caustic lack of willpower and wisdom. A centrist is a fool in a deadly game of chess, and in this game, winner takes all.
We need to have a less sympathetic mindset in general to our enemies–both Lefttards and Centrists–to spout sympathy is to give them a tactical advantage. We must be ruthless and cold, order out of chaos, unflinching in the face of an evil god.
A certain degree of ironic commentary is one thing, but I don’t agree that mocking whites who are killed by blacks, however retarded and toxic their beliefs is cool. It’s utterly cowardly and degenerate and it shows how strained sections of the right are, how they lack real victories, how they lack any character and have to find some pitiful spiteful triumph in this stuff. It’s pathetic.
This guy wasn’t killed because he was a Marxist, he was killed because the pos negro saw an easy white target. This victim could have believed anything.
There have been nationalists killed by blacks, there have been combat veterans killed by blacks in convenience stores.
The issue isn’t the belief but the proximity of blacks and the grave dangers to human life they pose.
He was killed because he never learned the ancient adage: “around blacks, never relax.” Had he been one of us he would have, and he might be alive today.
This column reminds me a bit of something I read in Patrick Leigh Fermor’s writings. In his trilogy of books where he recounts his walk at age 18 from the Hook of Holland to Constantinople, one episode is about some German friends he made as he crossed through that country.
One friend showed Paddy the upstairs of the family barn that he had converted into a shrine to National Socialism. Images of Hitler and other leaders on every wall, swastikas, iron crosses, the whole nine. Paddy was impressed. His friend then tells him (paraphrasing) ‘you should have seen this place a year ago; it was wall to wall red with hammer and sickles all over’.
Mr. Collington could have been just as easily cured from his devout Marxism had he lived to a more ripe age. RIP
My thoughts exactly. Many rightists start out as Marxists, myself included, and for many the conversion happens later in life. This could also just be wishful thinking, as this man seemed up to his neck in Marxian efforts, yet all it takes is one niggling realization that Marxism doesn’t work in a multicultural society where the working class are eternally divided and nobody unionizes, and the seeds of doubt are sown.
Of course it is possible that this fellow might have become a better person, and so his death is a possible loss.
But given that Tyrone was probably going to kill a white devil eventually, it is an actual gain that he killed Collington, someone who bears some guilt for America’s out of control racial crisis, rather than an entirely innocent white person.
Thank you for this sane comment. If Collington had survived this attack what are the odds he would have come out of the hospital and said, “Boy, was I wrong! Lock that negro up!!” Zero, I assure you. Idiots like Collington always double down.
And he would likely have blamed his misfortune on ‘gun control’, ‘systemic racism’ or such other BS. Anything but the real problem.
What of the people around him? I’ve seen shit libs become quietly racist after their day of reckoning, and their family n friends.
I really like your reasoning and agree. It’s a bit like a cost benefit analysis.
Can we call this Right-Wing Calculus?
The Science of quantifying a person’s value to White people, whether through their continued existence or abrupt ending of said item.
I was a Marxist at about his age before I woke up to more mainstream politics and then beyond. One can only hope that some of his friends wake up to this “chickens coming home to roost” moment. Sadly, many of them will probably go to their graves hating writers of articles like this one even as they are actually done in by jews or blacks. Great article and great analysis. Thank you.
I agree. Sam Collington got what he deserved. He was a race-traitor. He agitated for BLM – and then a Negro shot him dead. This should be a wake-up call for all those who mourn his passing. And the “progressive” DA, Larry Krasner, should be held to account – he’s a bigger criminal than this so-called “teen.”
A man reaps what he sows.
Not that Collington had had much chance to become a man.
Had he survived the mugging he may have emerged wiser and more conscious. He was a victim of his own hubris. He didn’t get what he deserved, everyone deserves a chance to learn racial survival.
An obituary of George Soros written in this style would focus on his financial brilliance. This kid hated you and would’ve gladly supported you starving to death. If you find yourself plagued by sympathy for him, the path ahead will consume you quickly.
The age difference matters.
I think the nonstop random violence in Philly killed this guy rather than any liberal inability to protect himself against the Black threat. It could have been anybody.
Krasner should definitely be blamed, though.
Well, Collington’s mother wants the perp prosecuted to the full extent of the law; she wants justice. This is unusual, as the victim’s relatives usually ‘forgive’ the feral ape and assist in the defense.
I guess I can muster some pity because I believe Collington was indoctrinated or had ‘religious fervor’ to the point of delusion.
There was guy named Treadwell who wanted to live among the bears, although he knew them to be dangerous predators and opportunistic scavengers. Eventually they devoured him. Then there was the case of Conrado Mores, a marielito who kept trying to climb the fence into the polar bear enclosure at the zoo; eventually he succeeded and the bears used his dead body like a beach ball.
RIP Comrade Collington
This article describes precisely how I felt when I first heard this story.
Glee and laughter as I trawled through his timeline for BLM supporting tweets. (He literally had a “shoot me” tweet days before).
Then some sort of sadness over the whole sorry mess. Could he have been saved sooner or later? Who knows, but I doubt it with the direction his politics were headed.
I want to feel compassion because he was a young dumb kid, but at the same time I could easily imagine him working for our enemies in a few short years. He was going to law school after all, no doubt to join a nonprofit BLM Bail project or whatever.
It’s a weird feeling. Call it: Schadencholy or Melanfreude.
Every form of leftism is a mental disorder, racial traitorism most of all. We must separate from them as well as other races. Eventually, the white leftist genome will go extinct via a combination of miscegenation and childlessness (perhaps with some assimilative disappearance into stronger white genomes able to override the genetic constellation which produced leftist susceptibility).
If only it were that simple. You may never have been a lefty, but many on the dissident right have been, and few, if any, could claim they were mentally ill.
I still think the overall point stands that leftist whites who refuse to abandon their poisonous and self-destructive belief system are going to reduce their numbers through a form of natural selection. This is not something to be lamented. Rather, we should welcome and encourage this phenomenon in every way that it can occur. It reduces the power of our foes and provides excellent rhetorical ammunition for us to use to persuade lefty whites (who still can be persuaded) to join our cause.
It’s kind of an odd position for an American white-nationalist dissident to take, but I’ve long maintained that our greatest obstacle as a people are other whites who embrace multicultural globalist progressive dogma. Jews, though they punch far above their weight class with their scheming and triangulation, are too few in number to pose any sort of threat to us if we commit to a serious fight. I am similarly not concerned with the prospect of blacks or low-IQ hispanic peasants forming a cohesive and genuinely threatening power bloc because they, frankly, are not able to do so without extremely significant outside support. Their individual criminal depredations are fairly predictable and easily circumvented (be where they aren’t, carry firearms, be willing and able to kill defensively).
Lefty whites however are organized, extremely well funded, dedicated , and collectively hold positions of tremendous power in this country. The majority of them that aren’t merely part of the unwashed masses of normies are not going to be persuaded to relinquish their position or their beliefs, and are eventually going to have to be violently accounted for. Sam Collington very obviously fits into this category and thus his death was necessary. He was paid the wages of his own sin and we’re now down one more foe for the coming reckoning.
Exactly the point I’ve been making here at CC for several years. I used to think (far into the 90s) that the problem was malevolent liberal Jewish control of almost all opinion-molding institutions, as well as simple white ignorance and naivete, and that if whites could just access the correct information about the war of dispossession being waged against us, politics would change rapidly.
How wrong I was (though I should have anticipated this)! Of course, the ultimate problem is with a huge portion of whites themselves. No other race is so (indeed, seemingly in the least) prone to ethnomasochism and self-abnegational altruism. Clearly, as Kevin MacDonald has been exploring over the past decade or more, there is some evolved mental defect disproportionately present among whites that renders so many of our people susceptible to race denialism and utopianism (whose ultimate wages are usually not individual death, but undeniably collective racial death). Surely anyone can see that traitors like this Collington creep are in some way mentally disturbed (perhaps a new psychiatric standard needs to be created?)? Their views, especially of race, are totally at variance with easily empirically demonstrable reality, and yet invariably, such creeps choose loyalty to their false understanding over amending their understanding to reflect reality – even when doing so brings them no personal benefits, other than psychic satisfaction. How is that not mental illness (it is certainly insanity by evolutionary standards)?
My conclusion is that vast numbers of whites are inherently (genetically) politico-mentally disturbed. I bet this Collington himself was no carjacker, mugger, rapist, etc. Unlike many on the ground antifa, whom I have argued are disproportionately simple criminals and sadists indulging their evil passions for mayhem and misery infliction while “flying under the radar” of a broader ideological movement, I believe Collington was one of the “true believers”, someone genetically prone to see race denialism as a moral act. I have a good old friend who is exactly like this. He’s a very nice and civic-minded non-Jewish white guy, who would never himself hurt anyone in any way, helps others where he can, but is pathetically prone to egalitarian brainwashing. There is literally no arguing with him. He refuses to relinquish his race utopian vision, no matter how easily I deconstruct and disprove his positions. That is genetics ‘speaking’. There are a lot of whites like my friend (who is not a Marxist, btw; just a skin-crawlingly intersectionally do-gooderist liberal). And if our race is to survive, we race preservationists must separate from them, too – indeed, perhaps even more so than from nonwhites. While I’m a pure ethnostatist (I want a sovereign, 100% all-white territorial polity), a sovereign nation that is composed of, say, 30% nonwhites + 70% whites like us, could itself be a bastion of long term white preservation because we would dominate all political offices and control our own cultural production and educational institutions.
But with (race-)liberal white genomes geographically (and politically) intermixed with white preservationist ones, even in an ethnostate, the tendency over time would be to weaken racial preservationist resolve. Liberals sometimes flee diversity, but almost always bring their own crappy ‘values’ with them, without modification. They never learn because the pull of their innate race-denying egalitarianism is simply too strong. I will never not be disgusted by, say, a smelly, urine-soaked vagrant sitting next to me on the subway. My reaction of disgust is innate. The white libtard will similarly always be disgusted by white pride and race realism. A few can be educated, perhaps the dumber ones, but most cannot. That’s “innateness” means.
This is what gives me hope for the future. It’s white and Jewish liberals who have a birth rate close to zero. If this mental defect is genetic, it’s removing itself from our pool. We’ll be smaller in number in the future but greater in solidarity against leftism
See my comment below. You are correct: I have never been liberal, lefty, etc. I was a campus conservative arguing for Reagan in 1980 (as with many young people today and Trump, we thought he was way further to the Right than he turned out to be), and was already fiercely anti-immigration (for racial reasons; I learned about the other harms much later), as well as resentful of the constant lies authority figures told to exculpate black misbehavior (yes, it was bad in the 1970s and 80s, too – though in a more “bleeding heart liberal” as against today’s harsher progressive marxist way).
Of course many racialists can be forgiven for having once been ‘osmotically’ indoctrinated. Race irrealism is the regnant ideology, and has been since the 60s. However, since the advent of the internet and the proliferation and dissemination of racial truth, there is ever less excuse for not being at least a race realist, if not white preservationist.
You know these libtards, many of them are true believers, and they’ll put themselves out there where the dangerous cretins are, thinking that they will change them with their hearts or some such nonsense. It’s likely the victim was not taking the advisable precautions viz a viz black crime, in which sense he might be considered a victim of the weaponized anti white media, which failed to instill the appropriate sense of risk in him.
You know, in the case of Derrick Todd lee, the black serial killer, many of of the white girls killed by him let him in—there were no signs of forced entry!
As Douglas Leake carelessly and no doubt unwittingly tweeted, a travesty. Here in Britain whenever one of our multicultural treasures runs amok destroying lives, it is customary for the authorities to extract a little Antifa/Kumbayah homily from grieving family and spouses. What a foul practice to use men and women as political pawns when they are at their most vulnerable! If we must copy the Left’s tactics at times, let us at least never stoop to their level of dishonour.
He got what he deserved.
Amen. His delusional politics was a byproduct of a sheltered background. Soft, bourgeois, and arrogant. I doubt he would have been concerned about the murder of a normal conservative white American.
Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.
He got what he deserved. It was poetic justice.
“Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.”
That line didn’t even make sense in Unforgiven, Clint.
I repeat: He got what he deserved.
I add: Good riddance.
Like Kyle Rittenhouse, this young man was an Eagle Scout with a keenly developed sense of social justice. In a sane society he would already have been one of us. Throwing young idealistic white people under a proverbial bus because of their deluded leftist thinking is not a winning strategy.
Nobody here is doing any “throwing under the bus.” Like I said, he might have become a decent human being in another timeline. But in this world, he was a Marxist who openly supported the policies of uncaging feral blacks and weaponizing them against whites. He thought he would be immune to be consequences. He found out. White people will die because of BLM and Soros DAs and Marxist agitation. That’s WHY they do this. I am just glad a guilty white person rather than an innocent one died this time. There will be many more innocent white victims before this is over, and people like Collington will be fighting against us every step of the way.
It’s possible he’d have matured. Not probable. Had he survived the attack he’d have probably not doubled down, even if he didn’t radicalize to the right. It’s a good idea to extend the hand of racial solidarity to young lads like this even if they slap it away in contempt. Lots of young men have an epiphany once they start paying taxes and rent. Most of the women who get cut down by blacks are assorting with them at the time. It’s still a pity that they get murdered or damaged by the experience.
Au contraire, it is the only strategy. Most whites as individuals are not (yet) engaged in a desperate struggle for daily survival. But whites qua whites are indeed fighting such a rearguard struggle for racial preservation and – while there is still time for us to control and choose our destiny – to prevent much, much worse oppression for future generations. We simply lack the energy and resources to de-brainwash every genetically-determined, ethnomasochistic “headcase” like this Collington. Our very best path forward is to separate ourselves from such racially insane whites, and allow their defective genomes over the next century to be “amalgamated” with nonwhites (ie, eliminated from the white gene pool), the sooner the better (see my comments above in this thread).
The author notes the outpouring of grief from people who knew Collington. This is important to understand why his murder will have an effect — and that that effect will be positive for the movement he professed.
“The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church.”
Paradoxical as it sounds to us, Collington’s murder reinforces the faith of his co-religionists, the Woke. He died for the faith and because of it. That makes him a martyr for it.
His friends will blame “the System” for his death, not the black man Williams. In like manner the Christian martyrs blamed pagan Rome for their deaths, not the lions who devoured them in the arena.
I’m sure there were both plenty of Roman spectators who laughed at the demise of those stupid Christians as there were others who simply couldn’t understand how anyone could believe the nonsense the Christians spouted, let alone die for it.
The Romans are estimated to have murdered approximately 2,000 Christians. Even there the Christians in the Colosseum fed to the lions would have only been a fraction of these executions and killings. It’s quite possible that several hundred early Christians were actually criminals: embezzlers deserters murderers thieves and many outright treasonous. The legal authorities disposed of hypocritical filth. Some Christians may have belonged to rival aristocratic factions and their beliefs merely incidental to their deaths. Diocletian looms large in these tales of virtuous Christian women getting abducted and executed. Did deeper and it’s just dynastic politics. Martyrs? ostly bullshit. The Romans killed their nearest rivals for power before and after Christianity. So do we. Given what we do know about Roman practice like decimation, mass enslavement, salting the Earth etc the Romans went soft on these Christians and the persecution’s were figments. If the Christians had been systematically persecuted they’d have vanished. That’s not to say that a myth is as powerful an any fact and perhaps more compelling. Communists in Spain killed about 20,000 clergy and you don’t hear much about them do you?
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment