You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here

1,280 words 

Recently, I spoke to some American activists about how White Nationalists can frame our message today.

The basic goal of White Nationalism is very simple: White Nationalism is about giving white people a future again.

Currently, white people have no future. Due to below replacement fertility, mixed marriages, and non-white immigration there are fewer and fewer whites with each passing year, and if these trends continue, whites will simply cease to exist. The White Nationalist solution to this problem is very simple: to reverse these trends.

Most white societies have programs in place to help steadily increase the populations of endangered forms of fish or fowl. So it should be relatively simple to adopt policies to ensure that, for instance, the Italian population of Italy increases rather than decrea

You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here

ses with each passing year.

The most natural reaction to such a proposal is not “Why?” but “Why not?” There are very few people who would simply come out and say they prefer fewer and fewer Italians in Italy, because the genocidal animus and outcome would be obvious.

How can we ensure that Italy becomes steadily more Italian as time goes by, and the same for other white countries?

First and foremost, we must declare that Italy is the homeland of the Italian people. This means the Italian government must put its own people first in all policies. Outsiders must accept the predominance of the Italian people, language, and culture in Italy. Why not?

There’s nothing unfair about that, since presumably most of them have homelands of their own where they can enjoy the same sort of privileges. The international community, moreover, should make it a priority to create such homelands for the stateless peoples of the earth. I call this position “universal ethnonationalism.”

Second, every ethnostate should be committed to pro-natal policies to ensure that its population does not go extinct. Declining white populations are not a mysterious natural phenomenon. They are the products of political and cultural policies, and they can be reversed by better  policies.

Third, every ethnostate needs to engineer migration trends to maintain the predominance of its own people. Again, rising non-white populations in white societies are not a cosmic mystery. They are the products of political decisions that can be reversed by better political decisions.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here

I can envision several objections.

First, if the Italian population of Italy rises steadily year after year, won’t that mean that someday Italy will be standing room only? Won’t Italy be up to its eyeballs in Italians?

It is refreshing to see such a clear understanding of the cumulative effects of slow changes over long periods of time. It is precisely such reasoning that allows us to grasp that, if present trends are not reversed, the Italian people will become extinct. Since this problem is actually happening, let’s focus on it first.

But what is my solution to the specter of Italian overpopulation? That won’t be an issue until long after anyone reading these words is dead, so don’t worry about it. Future generations of Italian statesman can deal with stabilizing Italy’s population. Today, we need to focus on saving Italy from national extinction.

Second, what about minorities? Won’t they fight tooth and nail against these policies? And won’t some white people also oppose us out of protective feelings toward minorities? Yes, there will be opposition to White Nationalist policies. But we don’t have to intellectually convert all our opponents, just enough of them so we can politically defeat the rest.

Moreover, a lot of minorities will go along with programs to increase the white population. After all we are not talking about shooting people, we are simply talking about instituting long term demographic and migration trends that will steadily increase the percentage of the native population in any given society.

That means that minorities will simply have to live with the knowledge that their populations will dwindle over the coming generations.

But we know that they can live with that knowledge just fine, because whites are living with the very same prospects in every one of our homelands today, and only a few of us (so far) are alarmed about it.

Moreover, a Somalian living in Italy can contemplate an ever dwindling population of his kind with equanimity, because he knows that there is a Somali homeland in Africa where there is no shortage of his people. The Italian contemplating his people’s extinction in their own homeland has no such solace.

Another way to reduce objections to White Nationalism is to adopt concrete population goals and timelines. Since being an ethnostate is primarily a normative concept, a nation can become an ethnostate instantaneously simply by deciding that, for instance, Sweden is the homeland of the Swedish people.

But how Swedish does the Swedish ethnostate need to be? If you say 100%, very few people will sign up for that. If you say 90%, a surprising number will be on board. Even more will be willing to entertain such a goal if it is brought about slowly, without violence, simply by changing long-term demographic trends.

This is why, as an interim proposal, I have suggested that American White Nationalists defend the target goal of a 90% white America by 2065, by reversing the anti-white trends set in motion in 1965. Those living in a 90% White Nationalist society who want to have the experience of 100% White Nationalist society would be able to do so, if we simply add freedom of association to the mix.

Such an approach allows whites to have their non-white friends while eating away at the overall non-white population.

The better sort of nonwhites would support such policies as well, because they want to live in white-created societies, and increased whiteness to them connotes more beauty, prosperity, and law and order. To a great extent, their utopia is our utopia as well, which is why they come to white countries in the first place. And, as for the specter of 100% White Nationalism, in such a scenario, that won’t even be a seriously debated until long after they are dead, so why should they worry?

You can buy Greg Johnson’s Truth, Justice, & a Nice White Country here

But what about the tens of millions of recent migrants? All of them have to go back, as quickly as possible. But what about “hard cases”? What about a rocket scientist from Ghana, an award-winning Hottentot novelist, a gourmet chef from Papua, or a didgeridoo virtuoso from the Outback? Surely we can’t summarily deport such elite human capital, regardless of their paperwork?

Here the sheer numbers work for us, for a change, as well as the perennial desire to pass the buck of hard decisions to future generations. We could literally remigrate tens of millions, a process that could take decades, before encountering a single one of these so-called hard cases. So let’s just focus on the easy cases for now: criminals, terrorists, welfare parasites, etc.

I’m betting we’ll get so hooked on the positive results of remigration—higher wages, lower rents, lower crime, less traffic, easier access to medical care, etc.—that nobody will cry about the hard cases when it is their turn.

In sum, our message today is this: white people have no future due to failed social experiments with multiculturalism and open borders. The goal of White Nationalism is to give our race a future again in all of our homelands. First, we must establish normative ethnonationalism in every white nation. Second, we must engineer pro-white demographic and migration trends. After that, we must maintain power and simply allow these positive trends to take effect.

We can kick all the hard decisions down the road to future generations, but in the here and now we can all bask in the happy thought that white people have a future once again.