2,352 words
Diaspora Jews—especially left-wing ones—have been a problematic ethnic minority for multiracial egalitarian societies in the West for many years. This is not merely because Jewish elites tend to feel that they are in a constant state of conflict with their host populations, but also because they often adhere to the following behavior pattern.
- A very high proportion of the Jewish population can be considered “elite,” that is, they are higher than average in intelligence and ethnocentrism, and have will to power.
- There is a striking uniformity of opinion among these elites, especially when they feel the ethnos is threatened.
- They can blend in among whites, especially the white elites.
- They are neurotic, meaning that among other things they will often overreact quite radically to perceived threats.
I am aware that this list might seem skimpy. But if we remove any one of the conditions above, then Jewish behavior will begin to resemble the behavior of other, less problematic ethnicities. I think this list is appropriate because it explains some of the good things Jews can do in the political sphere as well. A great example is how many so-called right-wing, “based” Jews in America have utilized all four of these criteria to combat the Left and the very real threat of Islam.
One such Jew who springs to mind is Laura Loomer.
When I first learned of Loomer years ago, I wanted to like her. During her unsuccessful campaign for Congress back in 2020, I was struck by her Trumpian levels of resilience in the face of leftist smears and cancellations. She was roundly banned from social media, payment processors, and various rideshare and service apps, and still she did not back down. I was further impressed by her 2022 interview with Jared Taylor in which she promised to have Taylor speak on the floor of the House of Representatives if victorious in her second bid for Congress. (She wasn’t.) In 2017, she announced her support for White Nationalism, and in 2020, she described herself as a “proud Islamophobe.” She’s also highly active on X and never fails to call out the Left or Islam, as these recent tweets attest:
She supports using troops against Antifa.
She opposes free healthcare for illegals:
She supports exposing the crimes of the Deep State:
She called for condemning the Muslim mayor of Dearborn for intimidating a Christian resident:
And her adulation of Donald Trump is exuberant (if perhaps a little extreme).
She’s also not afraid of calling a spade a spade while feuding with blacks, as exemplified recently by her very public spat with Congressman Jasmine Crockett. She has accurately referred to Crockett as “ghetto,” a “hoodrat” and a “typical DEI Shaniqua.” She’s not even using what could be called code-speak here. Her contempt of the anti-white blackity-blacks in government is loud and proud—as it should be.
Moreover, Loomer approaches Andrew Anglin levels of racist wit, which is no mean accomplishment. For example, she once said that if Kamala Harris beat Trump, “the White House will smell like curry and White House speeches will be facilitated via a call center.” Not bad, Laura. Not bad.
So what’s not to like about Laura Loomer?
Well, unfortunately, there are a few things. She’s a professional agitator and tireless attention seeker, which, for me at least, can get tiresome. For example, during her 2020 campaign she handcuffed herself to a Twitter office to protest her ban. In 2019, she and three Hispanic men jumped the fence at Nancy Pelosi’s residence to protest her opposition to Trump’s border wall. Most famously, in 2017, she livestreamed her interruption of a production of Julius Caesar because the director dressed the soon-to-be-assassinated Caesar up like Trump. In fairness to Loomer, she hasn’t pulled stunts like these in the last few years, but when she did, she came across more as a troll than as someone to be taken seriously. But on X, she still trolls away. Observe:
Harvey Weinstein fucked your wife. @GavinNewsom
I know you’re mad you have to pretend to still love her as she calls herself the “first partner” and probably still has the taste of Harvey’s dick in her mouth, but that’s not an excuse to try to get Trump officials and ICE… https://t.co/Vqbz50Oulu
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 27, 2025
She also reportedly has had mental health issues, which has led to tabloid-like drama in Trump’s outer circles. (Although Trump’s inner circle wasn’t always that much better.) In 2019, Loomer told The Spectator World that at one point she had suffered from depression and anxiety. She also admitted to doing cocaine. In inter-party squabbling since Trump 2.0, both Milo Yiannopoulos and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene have used this information against Loomer. The Yiannopoulos-Loomer feud in particular was intense.
Another knock on her is that she takes it upon herself to gatekeep the Trump White House as well as the Republican Party. She treats the Right almost as if it were a cult and acts as if she’s the high priestess who decides the line between legitimate opinion and wrongthink. Famously, in April 2025, she convinced Trump to fire a handful of national security officials, ostensibly over their sloppy use of the public Signal app, which somehow included a journalist in their group chat. But it could have been because she deemed them insufficiently loyal to Trump. She also makes unilateral declarations like this one:
Any Republican who criticized President Trump over J6 should be kicked out of the party and socially ostracized. pic.twitter.com/5MYfYr2PFb
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 27, 2025
While she may well have been correct in the first case (I have a feeling she was) and is definitely correct in the second, her autocratic attitude makes me shudder to think of the unnecessary rifts she could cause on the Right whenever she’s not correct. In general, it’s better to work on healing divisions among fellow travelers—or at least coexisting with them—than it is to banish people into the wilderness if they displease you. Sometimes good people get banished, like Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran, and Sam Francis in the 1980s and 1990s.
Unfortunately, Loomer’s worst qualities have been on display very recently. When she detects any criticism or skepticism regarding Israel from the Right, she will lash out almost as viciously in that direction as she does towards the Left. In this way she behaves like a based Ben Shapiro. Where one of Shapiro’s goals is to prune anti-Semitism from mainstream conservatism, one of Laura Loomer’s is to prune it from the Dissident Right. A tougher task, which is maybe why is she is more strident on just about every topic than Shapiro is. (Or it just could be her personality. Who knows?)
In any event, this leads us to the one main player on the Right who has caught flak from both Shapiro and Loomer, but especially from Loomer, as of late: Tucker Carlson.
Carlson recently spoke at the memorial for Charlie Kirk, in which he said this:
Ultimately he [Charlie] was a Christian evangelist. It actually reminds me of my favorite story ever. So it’s about 2000 years ago in Jerusalem, and Jesus shows up and he starts talking about the people in power, and he starts doing the worst thing that you can do, which is telling the truth about people. And they hate it. And they just go bonkers. They hate it. And they become obsessed with making him stop. This guy has got to stop talking. We’ve got to shut this guy up! And I can just sort of picture this scene in a lamplit room with a bunch of guys sitting around eating hummus thinking about what do we do about this guy telling the truth about us? We must make him stop talking! And there’s always one guy with the bright idea, I can just hear him say, “I’ve got an idea! Why don’t we just kill him? That’ll shut him up. That’ll fix the problem!” Hahahahaha!
(Sorry, I just had to include that laugh.)
Anyway, whether Carlson meant it or not, his little speech aggravated the already-livid gash in American rightist circles between Zionism and isolationism. In the former camp we have people like Loomer, Shapiro, and Mark Levin, while in the latter we have people like Carlson, Mark Dice, and likely Charlie Kirk before he was murdered. It’s basically a Jew-Gentile divide with some defectors in either direction such as Glenn Greenwald and Glen Beck. Carlson had already exacerbated things this past summer with his energetic opposition to Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities at Israel’s behest. Some right-wing Jews saw this as an existential insult, and for them his speech at the Kirk memorial pushed the insult even further. In their feverish imaginations, not only did Carlson remind the Jews that they had killed Christ, but he also hinted that they had killed Charlie Kirk as well.
Of course, Carlson said no such thing. He simply relayed a story from the New Testament. But that didn’t stop Laura Loomer from going scorched earth against him. In just a few days, she accused Carlson of blaming the Jews for killing Kirk, she called for the GOP to denounce him, she called him “evil” and “demonic,” and dubbed him “the modern day leader of Hitler youth.”
Of course, in any political movement there will be differences of opinion which lead to factionalism and strife. Loomer’s statements goes well beyond this, however, and become indistinguishable from enemy action. Being a mere human being, I am having a hard time not resenting her for attacking Carlson in his way. Firstly, calling someone a Nazi who doesn’t openly proclaim himself aligned with Nazism (like, for example, Joel Davis), dehumanizes that person. Dehumanization is what you do to enemies, not friends, allies, or neutral parties. Secondly, Carlson is galaxies apart from how Loomer characterizes him. He’s never condemned Israel or Zionism as far as I know. He’s never called for violence or retribution against Jews. He’s also never used language as sweeping as the relatively mild language I employ in the opening paragraphs of this essay. He simply promotes American isolationism in line with the wishes of George Washington. Perhaps he’s motivated in part by guilt over his previous support of wars in the Middle East—back when Jews like Laura Loomer weren’t smearing him with the N-word. Either way, Carlson was perfectly within his rights, both in his opposition to attacking Iran and in accurately relaying a story from the New Testament. This should be clear regardless of how one feels about Israel or Zionism.
Finally, Loomer should know by now that branding someone with the scarlet “N” these days is grounds to get that person murdered. The Charlie Kirk assassination and the two failed Trump assassinations should have made that abundantly clear. By saying what she said, was Laura Loomer actually calling for the assassination of Tucker Carlson? Occam’s Razor tells me probably not. She’s a little unstable to begin with, and when ensconced within that squalid scrolling hate zone of social media, it’s all too tempting to put on your devil horns and remove your rant filter. And since she has the reputation as a flame-throwing provocateur, backtracking would hurt her brand. So she doubled and tripled down on Carlson, not thinking of the possible ramifications of her irresponsibility. That, I think, is the likelier explanation. But I could be wrong.
I will say, however, that if, God forbid, anyone on the Right or Left makes an attempt on Tucker Carlson’s life, everyone on the Right from Trump on down should hold Laura Loomer partly responsible. We should give her the same treatment that she would like to impose on right-wing heretics today. She should be discredited as a closet Bolshevik and Stalinist, treated with the utmost hostility as a traitor, and dropped kicked by the seat of her pants out of the movement and into the arms of the Left. And then she’ll see how far bitching about Islam will get her.
This is why I call for Laura Loomer to publicly apologize to Tucker Carlson—while there is still time to forgive. But if the assassination culture on the Left continues to metastasize, and Tucker—God forbid—goes down, there will no more time for forgiveness. Only hate. And Laura Loomer should get it as bad as anyone on the Left.
Doomsday scenarios aside, however, I still want to like her. Loomer’s interview with Jared Taylor does go a long way with me, even if I personally find her a bit repellent. She does do good work. And I do find the Loomer-Carlson axis to be fascinating. Should the Dissident Right support a more aggressive advocate for our interests in Loomer, who is more likely to stab us in the back? Or should we support a less aggressive advocate for our interests in Carlson, who is less likely to stab us in the back? I’m going with the latter option simply because we have enough enemies on the Left as it is. The Dissident Right can applaud her when she attacks our enemies, but we should never trust her.
When it comes down to it, Laura Loomer behaves Jewishly, as Kevin MacDonald would say. This is the source of our troubles with her. Despite coming from the Right, she follows the above rubric to a tee.
- Above average intelligence and ethnocentrism, plus the will to power? Check.
- Agreement with other Jewish elites when it comes to smearing badthinkers as Nazis? Check.
- Blending in among white elites? Check.
- Neurotic? Yeah, I think we can safely check this box too.
This rubric is not meant to demean Jews. Rather, it reflects a pattern of Jewish diaspora power that Gentiles have been noticing for centuries—a pattern that has led to great death and destruction in the form of communism. Of course, there are Jewish diaspora leaders who set aside their ethnicity. Stephen Miller is a great example. Unfortunately, there are few Stephen Millers and many Jews who fulfill the four criteria above. Laura Loomer shows that Jews don’t have to come from the Left to do so.
26 comments
(Sorry, I just had to include that laugh.) <— That made me laugh.
Quick primary school joke: What goes, ha-ha-ha-plop?
Answer: Someone laughing his head off.
Okay, now, regarding, “This is why I call for Laura Loomer to publicly apologize to Tucker Carlson—while there is still time to forgive…” Spencer, please clarify, is this a serious question, or are you being facetious?
What’s the purpose of compelling speech –forcing a verbal, & totally insincere apology? It seems more sensible to request that she simply announce her intentions of either continuing to do something, or not. Let’s not pretend anyone is sincere in the American mainstream media political show.
I’m reminded of BOE meetings, where panel members have said, “We must respect all opinions!” Um, no, actually we mustn’t. Newsflash: We can still act civil, while having ZERO respect for your completely misguided opinions. I don’t happen to be a phony, thanks.
Excellent article; there really is a “based other” problem. It seems that the JQ is emerging as one of the top white issues (I just finished reading Kevin MacDonald’s C of C–what a tour de force!) As time goes on and the source of our decline becomes more apparent to greater numbers, it may be harder for those like Loomer, for whom all roads lead to Israel, to hold their position on the far right. Eventually, they are going to be forced to make a choice–you can’t side with both the oppressed and their oppressors forever. And it appears her choice has already been made.
Thanks, Derek. I think Loomer would be more palatable to a lot of us if she were more honest about her loyalties. She loves her ethnostate more than ours, that’s what it boils down to. But that does not mean she can’t do good work. She just has to chill with the Nazi name calling.
I am glad you brought up Glen Beck, he would make a great article for what the jews did to him on his discussion of The Creature From Jekyll Island. 🙃
This article summarizes well the problem of the “based other”. I don’t follow Laura Loomer and I don’t know much about what she says and does. I recall that she ran for Congress, which scandalized many on the Left, because they have no tolerance for anyone outside their bubble of lunacy. The Left really hate her, which is always a big plus for me. After reading this article, I don’t trust her. But she seems like a useful ally.
Loomer has done some good things, for instance kicking off the counter-Jeethad, which was a principled populist stance.
But when she started pushing the absurd Qatar talking point and going after Tucker, she was obviously very dishonest, and I had to put her yentaing on mute.
I also find her psychological intensity wearying. This is one of the main reasons for total separation. Jews never give it a rest. Whites, especially reserved WASPy whites, find them pushy. We’ve got better things to do than repel their constant efforts to reshape things to their liking–better things like building civilization. Thus it is best to exclude them entirely.
It has always seemed to me that people on our side are constantly poking fun at her appearance. She is no Kathy Ireland for sure, but she’s not Kathy Bates either. It all seems kind of petty.
I wonder if she has had a “bob job” done on that nose, if not she is not a pure Jew. 🙃
She most certainly had plastic surgery. Back when Lauren Southern was one of the prominent figures of the “alt light”, who some consider fellow travelers in our circles, Loomer sort of changed her appearance to resemble what one might imagine a Lauren Southern/Ben Shapiro hybrid would look like. I think she was trying to compete with Southern because Southern had a lot of thirsty followers, and if there’s one universal truth about Jewish women, they are jealous of beautiful gentile blondes. Even in the picture in this article, you can see that she showed her plastic surgeon a picture of Southern and said “here, I want to look like this”.
At 0:12, a screenshot shows a May 23, 2015 tweet from ☑ @Lauren_Southern
@willfull19 Jewish people are still recovering from the holocaust, and my grandparents escaped the Nazi’s in Denmark and lost everything.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fICGyEKPK4LO
https://internationalplus.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Laura-Loomer-Before-and-After.webp
She looked better pre cosmetic surgery. She ruined herself like Jenifer Grey.
Fred, looks are a very easy thing to go after as looks & fertility are essential to our intrinsic value in a traditional society. This is just one of the reasons having women as elected political leaders is an unnecessary distraction. By choosing such a career, we aren’t within our natural, and most vital element. We’re best qualified as mothers to raise the next generation.
I’m not on twitter, but seeing her tweet @GavinNewsom showcases her coarseness. Women shouldn’t get into such vulgar public exchanges. No woman should strive to win a public vulgarity contest against a man. It’s always a losing battle the ‘fairer’ sex. She would just be debasing herself in the process.
All of that said, over the past 10+ years, Loomer has had several obvious plastic surgeries, including a nose job. There are a few pro-trans groups (so take that for what you will) which released face pics they purport to be Loomer before he became “Laura”. If you search “Laura Loomer” & click ‘see images’ the pics should pop right up.
I agree, Fred. The minute someone goes after an opponent’s looks, his objectivety and credibility suffer. It’s taken as pettiness and cruelty for pettiness’ and cruelty’s sake, and sure to ostracize would-be allies:
“Hey, come join us! We’re White Nationalists.”
“But aren’t you guys the Nazis?”
“Yes, but we also like to berate people for things they have no control over.”
I agree. I don’t like the mean girls nationalist vibe.
Laura’s fashion/surgery mistakes actually argue for her sincerity. I think a totally fake plant would look fairer and feel fouler. She reminds me of certain lower middle class ethnic girls from Long Island, which is I think where she is from. Think the extras in Goodfellas.
Yeah, her looks are irrelevant.
My commentary about her surgery wasn’t really meant to be catty or means spirited. In my other comments I certainly defend her as an ally and I’m not overly concerned with her ethnocentrism. We can understand Jewish power and motives without being cranks. I do find it fascinating, however, that Lauren Southern’s aesthetic was what appeared in my eyes to be what Loomer was going for. It was very jarring when I saw her for the first time, post surgery. I really had to do a double take. But I agree, we don’t want to make unnecessary enemies based on such frivolous things.
Laura Loomer reminds me of the ancient Egyptian sculpture of the wife of Rahotep:
larry joomer is beneath hailee steinfeld, on par with beanie feldstein and a step up from the odious kathy griffin.
I have a soft spot for her. I can sort of respect a certain about of ethnocentrism with Jews, at least the right wing ones. This is why being against Zionism isn’t super high on my priority list. They need some place to live where they don’t harm US, and I’d prefer they be led by Loomer’s ilk.
Connor, Zionism is world-communist totalitarianism led by Judeo-supremacists that require all Gentiles worldwide be their indentured slaves for eternity. I’m not exaggerating. But what is worse than this, is we have way more Christian-Zionists in the U.S. who go along with this, than Jewish Zionists. They are both working on the same religious (& military) quest to bring about the Rapture. The Christians think Jesus will ‘correct’ wayward Jews, & Jews think, “Goyim, you are ours now!”
I mean, I do think that International Jewry conspires through powerful global organizations to position their tribe to its advantage. I think it is an innate, inbred behavior that manifests not only at an individual level but also a social level among their tribe. I know a very smart Jewish man who has all the right-wing characteristics, with a libertarian streak, that Loomer possesses. I was working with him on a project for work and without me even prying for this commentary, he told me that he wasn’t keen on going to Europe for a work trip because of “heightened antisemitism in Europe” at the time. In other words, he gets tribal information through grapevine Jewish networks about the political winds in different parts of the world. Gentiles have no equivalent. About the closest it gets for us is “don’t go into that neighborhood, it’s a bad part of town” as a warning against black violence.
All of this is to say, I don’t have any delusions about Jewish power as it pertains to Zionism. Nor do I discount the obsession with Zionism of some evangelicals. (I’m Christian by the way). But I also know that most of that is just Sunday talk and most Christians don’t really think too much about the “supernatural” aspects of Christianity. It’s just a guidebook for life for most people. The Rapture isn’t going happen, but “end times” most certainly will.
Western Civilization is regressing. Matt Walsh mentioned in his most recent podcast a new “guidance” published by the UK medical elites that says “incest with cousins is actually OK”. In short, because of the vast numbers of third world migrants and their customs, the UK is succumbing to political pressure to politicize what should be cut and dry medical science. This doesn’t bode well for the future. End Times will be here sooner than you think.
Getting a little off topic there, But the Zionism of actionable global politics doesn’t have that mythical Jewish “Gods Chosen” feel to it. Sure, the land they claim is “promised” to them, but if all they’re going to do is live in it, I don’t much care. That’s the Zionism that doesn’t bother me too much.
In order to be bothered by the other stuff about Zionism, I almost have to suspend belief that it might actually come true, which it won’t.
Based/”right-wing characteristics”:
#1A Pro free speech (this includes “antisemitim”; speech criticizing Jews/Israel)
#2A Pro gun (against gun restrictions)
This was foreseeable. A right wing ethnonationalist Jew will by definition hold Israel as a bedrock issue. That’s perfectly logical. While there can be much agreement along the way, they will inevitably come into conflict with our style of America first ethnocentrism somewhere down the line.
Glenn Greenwald is a far leftist who merely was honest about the persecution of trump(Russian collusion hoax et al.) in trumps first term. By showing integrity, he relegated himself to a party of one.
Is the outer-circle Trump drama you are referring to the Loomer Milo debacle? If not, can you elaborate?
I think that is one of the things that made me gravitate towards Amren and Counter-Currents was that Jared Taylor and Greg Johnson respectively came across as normal people. I associate these men and their organizations with great articles and hour plus long podcasts discussing the critical issues of our time. I associate Laura Loomer as the lady that trespassed into the lawn of the Speaker of the House.
I think there’s a time and place for trolling, but shitposting is only going to get you so far.
I made it this far into Spencer’s essay until I found what I was looking for:
…[B]ack when Jews like Laura Loomer weren’t smearing [Tucker Carlson] with the N-word [Nazi]…
Then this, that was enough to let me know I don’t give a shit what Jewess Laura Loomer has to say:
…Despite coming from the Right, she {blah, blah, blah]
So, what does that say about the so-called “Right”?
I don’t even know what the word “based” used like this means. I was based in several military facilities. The Bible is based on a pack of Jewish myths. That’s what I know.
What could that have to do with this “based”Jewess, Ms. Loomer? So I looked it up. Jew-owned Mirrian-Webster tells us it’s a nigger word, picked up later by the alt-right:
The slang use of based is widely credited to Berkeley, California rapper Lil B, whose 2007 album with hip-hop group The Pack was titled Based Boys, and who counts “The BasedGod” among his aliases.
Based means being yourself. Not being scared of what people think about you. Not being afraid to do what you wanna do. Being positive. When I was younger, based was a negative term that meant like dopehead, or basehead. People used to make fun of me. They was like, “You’re based.” They’d use it as a negative. And what I did was turn that negative into a positive. I started embracing it like, “Yeah, I’m based.” I made it mine. I embedded it in my head. Based is positive. —Lil B, quoted in Complex, 9 Jun. 2010
The term was later taken up ironically in online circles by the alt-right in the 2010s, which brought it more attention.
Spencer wrote approvingly of Trump mouthpiece and racial Jew Stephen Miller. Is Miller a Rightist, another based Jew? How about racial Jew Ron Unz. He’s popular with White Rightists. Is he a “based” Jew? If so, where do Rightists draw the line between Aryans and Jews? Just wondering. I’d like to know.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.