2,474 words 
So the last three weeks have been a doozy, haven’t they? After four months of Trump 2.0 going from victory to victory as he fulfilled campaign promises and trolled his enemies as only he can, the Trump Train finally skidded to an ignominious halt. First there was his public feud with his former DOGE chief Elon Musk, which was nasty, childish, and embarrassing. Then we had the violent race riots in Los Angeles, which captured headlines for nearly a week. In both cases, Trump seemed to handle himself reasonably well. At the same time however, following the news wasn’t so much fun anymore.
Now with the entry of the United States in the war between Israel and Iran, the news has become quite terrifying. What makes it worse is that I don’t know what sources to trust, and I certainly don’t know what’s happening behind closed doors in the halls of power. What world leaders or the media tell us may or may not be the truth. And, of course, not knowing what exactly happened yesterday severely hampers one’s ability to predict what’s going to happen tomorrow.
Will Iran retaliate or capitulate? I have no idea. What I do know is that the truth is always the first casualty of war. This is how it has to be. After all, it’s better to win a war and lie than tell the truth and come in second. Still, if I put on my White Nationalist hat and step back far enough, I believe I can help organize our thoughts so that racially aware whites can at least know what we agree on, what we disagree on, and why. Perhaps such insights can help us coalesce into a more coherent, less fractious movement.
The facts, put as simply as possible, seem to be the following. After two decades of fretting that Iran is on the brink of obtaining nuclear weapons, the Israelis have finally decided that this time the Iranians are really on the brink of obtaining nuclear weapons. That they have been battling Iranian proxies for the past year and a half during their ethnic cleansing campaign in the Gaza Strip is either a sheer coincidence or the real reason behind all the bluster, depending on whom you talk to. The hostilities began on June 13th with a surprise Israeli attack. After softening Iran up with long-distance bombing, the Israelis roped a seemingly reluctant Donald Trump into mopping up this Middle Eastern mess. On Saturday evening, June 21st, President Trump announced Operation Midnight Hammer in which US forces had eliminated three Iranian nuclear sites. He claimed the attacks were a big success. Then again, everything Trump does is a big success. So who knows how successful these attacks really were?
No information yet on the casualty counts. Hopefully they’re low, given that Israel had already struck these sites, which presumably would have prompted evacuation days ago. It also remains to be seen how the Iranians plan to respond. So far they are talking a good game and backing it up by closing the Strait of Hormuz. But for all we know, they may just be looking for a way to save face before surrendering. Unsurprisingly, Pakistan and Russia seem none too pleased about the attack, but haven’t yet threatened to enter the fray themselves. Who knows how all this will play out?
The first thing that most of us on the dissident right will probably agree on is that this is not our fight. It matters little to us if Iran has nuclear weapons. The Iranians pose no direct threat to white interests in a geopolitical sense, at least no more than Pakistan does. And Pakistan has had nukes for decades. Iranians (and Muslims in general) may pose a demographic threat to whites through immigration, but unless their immigrants roll up on our shores with fissile material strapped to their backs, the nuke issue is really neither here nor there.
This leads us to the second thing we can all agree upon: Donald Trump launched this attack on behalf of Israel, not because flattening the Iranian nuclear program directly benefits the United States. Anyone who believes Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that Iran was planning to nuke New York City is gullible indeed. Claims that Iran was behind Trump’s assassination attempts are almost as sketchy. I would need to see serious proof that the Iranians were first in line among Trump’s well-funded murderer’s row of leftist enemies before subscribing to this particular conspiracy theory.
The third thing we can all agree on is that Trump’s actions have brought us closer to another world war—and not for any good reason. This is scary indeed. Assassinating Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 because he was, according to the Pentagon, “actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region,” was one thing. After all, Soleimani was no innocent babe in the woods, and he was just one guy. But Operation Midnight Hammer is on another level. This was an act of war which can enflame nationalist or religious passions, drag in other nations, and get millions killed. I’m not saying this will happen, but it’s much likelier now than it was on Friday. So much for Trump’s promise of no new wars. Thanks to him, whites in America—and especially in the American military—are in greater danger. And all for the sake of a foreign country wanting to feel more secure in its region—if we take the Israelis at their word, that is. And if they’re lying about their designs, then everything just gets far, far worse, doesn’t it?
The final thing I think we can all agree on is that bombing Iran was a mistake and Trump shouldn’t have done it. Where most folks will disagree, however, will be in assessing the magnitude of this mistake.
I predict that pro-white dissidents will divide into two camps: the Anti-Zionists and the Isolationists. In the next few days world events may hold their differences in stark relief since being in either group reveals how much enmity a person has towards Jews. The greater the enmity, the likelier a person will be in the former group. We should also remember that this is a difference of priorities not fundamentals. We should argue among ourselves, of course, but not get too heated or personal over it.
The Anti-Zionists will paint Israel as a rapacious oppressor which is using Iran’s fictitious nuclear arms program as an excuse to expand its power while it continues to prosecute its genocide in Gaza. As usual, it is employing every species of lie it can to murder Iranian leadership, cripple its defenses, and cajole or strongarm the United States to do its bidding. Yes, the Jews are that powerful. They are also the villains. Not only do they oppress the Palestinians and are hypocritical ethnonationalists, they also work in tandem with their leftist diaspora, which is the driving force behind mass immigration and the cultural decline of the West. Anything that benefits Israel will likely work to everyone else’s detriment in the long run. It is to Donald Trump’s great shame that he has truck with them at all. He has proven himself to be a Zionist stooge and golem. This was a great betrayal, and the complete reversal of all the good things he has accomplished since being reelected.
Anti-Zionists themselves might offer a more nuanced perspective than what I have above, but I think this covers the basics more or less accurately.
The Isolationists, on the other hand, will likely disapprove of the attack as well, but for different reasons and with less Manichean panache. Will this lead to World War III? Will China, Pakistan, or Russia get involved? Will a protracted war with Iran cause refugees to flee to Europe and the United States? Will it engender more terrorism in the West? Will the attack lead to another forever war in the Middle East with American boots on the ground? The primary difference between the Anti-Zionists and the Isolationists is that the former group will view the attack as inherently bad, while the latter will view it as bad only if one or more of the above questions can be answered in the affirmative. If not and if things cool down within the next few weeks, then the attack will eventually be viewed simply as a hiccup—a rather loud, smelly, and obnoxious hiccup, but a hiccup nonetheless within the course of Trump’s otherwise excellent presidency.
And let’s be honest. The Iranians and the Palestinians aren’t innocent either. Their leadership seems to want war with Israel as much as Israel wants war with them. So why get involved in the first place? Didn’t George Washington warn us against foreign entanglements? Haven’t whites in Europe been at war with Muslims on and off for one-and-a-half millennia? Have we forgotten about Islamic terrorism and grooming gangs and no-go zones? Why are the Muslims necessarily in the right in this case just because their enemies happen to be Jews? They aren’t. They really aren’t.
This is why I consider myself more of an Isolationist. It’s not that I lack sympathy for the Anti-Zionist perspective. It’s just that I see this conflict as a land dispute occurring between two different groups of non-whites, and I don’t particularly care who’s in the right. Although we should follow it carefully because like anyone else we may not be immune from its impacts, the level of urgency is simply not high enough to warrant our getting involved. Early nineteenth century Muslim Barbary pirates capturing US vessels and enslaving passengers and crews did give Americans that sense of urgency. Israel claiming—honestly or not—that Iran is about to get nukes while it wages its own vicious little war in Gaza clearly doesn’t.
But as an Isolationist, I would like to raise a novel concern of my own.
In their actions during the past few days, the Israelis have demonstrated three things. First, they put on display the true effectiveness of their military and intelligence community. They managed to attack Iran from secret locations within Iranian borders. They assassinated individual leaders and top nuclear scientists. They had moles everywhere in the Iranian government. And at one point they hacked Iranian state media to urge the Iranian people to rebel against their leaders. Even the Anti-Zionists would have to admit that the Israelis so far have done an excellent job in raining hell down upon the Iranians.
Secondly, the sheer success of Israel intelligence vis-à-vis Iran puts lie to the idea that the Israelis were somehow taken by surprise on October 7th, 2023. They knew damn well the Palestinians were about to attack, and they allowed them to rampage across Israel for hours in order to acquire their much needed casus belli to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians from Gaza. This was their Pearl Harbor, essentially. There is no way an intelligence community as on point as Israel’s could have been caught with their pants down by what amounted to a second-world militia in paragliders.
Finally, the Israelis have shown exactly how ruthless and untrustworthy they are when pursuing their interests. One can support these interests, oppose them, or be neutral. But if the events of the past few days have proven anything, it’s that the Israels will stop at nothing to get what they want. They would cut off a finger if it meant their enemy loses a hand. They would cut off a hand if it meant their enemy loses an arm. This is real Old Testament stuff. Further, it is possible that the true reason why Trump bombed Iran was not because he’s Netanyahu’s Shabbos goy, but rather because the Israelis promised him they’d nuke those sites themselves if he didn’t act. Thus, by taking them out with B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles, Trump was actually saving lives. I have no idea if this is what happened, but I certainly wouldn’t put it past the Israelis to behave like this.
Knowing these three things, a white nationalist can only come to one very unsettling conclusion: If the Israelis can do this to Iran, they could certainly do it to us. And by “us” I don’t mean the United States. By “us” I mean a post-red-state-secession white ethnostate in North America. Because I take White Nationalism seriously and believe that separation from non-whites is the only long-term solution to our people’s current problems, an ethnostate with a perpetual white supermajority should be the goal of every racially aware white. In our minds, we should always be seceding.
In such a future, would the Israelis strike us? Would they launch nuclear armed missiles from submarines three hours after an ethnostate is declared? Netanyahu recently described Iran’s top scientists as “Hitler’s nuclear team.” Clearly, they still have Nazis on the brain. How do you think Netanyahu’s successors would react to Anti-Zionists taking over a million square miles in the former United States? In the neurotic Jewish imagination Anti-Zionists are no different than real Nazis. So the answer is not well, I can assure you. For all we know the Israelis are wargaming this right now.
This is why Anti-Zionists make me nervous. Yes, I hope white dissidents will continue to criticize Israel. Lord knows they deserve it. But when we ignore the sins of the other side—the Iranians and Palestinians in particular, and Muslims in general—that’s when we go from isolation to participation. This, in my mind, is an unnecessary risk. With enough Israel bashing today we may gain ourselves a formidable enemy some time in the future when we might be at our most vulnerable. We might be able to deal with such a threat. Then again, we might not. Either way, I think we need to take such an alarmist possibility into consideration before we opine about the current war.
As for Trump, he needs to tread carefully or he will go from one of the best presidents since George Washington to the absolute worst. He needs to back off and let the Israelis take the lead as much as possible. He also needs to go out of his way to make nice with the Iranians to prevent a nuclear holocaust. If there ever was a time to practice the art of the deal, this is it.
One more thing. Trump should announce that this marks the end of US aid to Israel. For all the anxiety and danger they are putting the world in right now, they deserve not one more red penny moving forward. No more will this small country on the other side of the globe take our wealth and repay us with war after war after war. I’m sure this is something all of us can agree upon.
49 comments
Nice article. I have another idea we should consider. First the context:
ten days ago there was a metropolitan provincial uprising in a major American port city. A colonizing population revolted against the enforcement of our laws and the provincial governor sided with the colonists. The homeland government of the colonists openly called for their colonists to rebel and vote to strike down taxes on the remittances, the extraction of American wealth sent to the colonizer’s homeland. It also openly declared its hostility by declaring our borders illegitimate and declared their intent to reclaim a territory we acquired through purchase. That territory amounts to 1/3rd of the total territory of the United States. There are over 60 million of the colonizers settled in the United States.
What is the United States doing about it? Has it declared war? Has it moved to immediately sanction Mexico and the other Latin American states with their colonizers in America? Has it declared a state of emergency due to a hostile invasion and sent urgent diplomatic missions to those countries? Has it declared the provincial state’s governor and its municipal leaders conspiring with the colonists aiding and abetting an invasion and siding with a hostile foreign power and thus clearly culpable in open treason? Isn’t the Secretary of State a Latin American? How is he compromised due to this?
That is the issue and the angle and our path forward in my opinion. This is a massive existential crisis that America is ignoring while it moves its military might far offshore and spends its energies on that conflict.
We would do well to point out the existential crisis within our own territory. Btw, this existential crisis was predicted by an imperial supporter deep within the empire’s power structure. George Friedman wrote a book called, “The Next 100 Years.” In it, he called for America to invite in huge numbers of people, even to pay them to come, so that its GDP could support the GAE dominating the world through sea and space. He predicted that after the GAE had established perpetual sea and space dominance in 2080 that the Latin Americans that dominate the population of the American heartland, would conspire with Mexico as its compatriots to stage a war within America’s territory.
Well, ten days ago, 60 years ahead of schedule that war started. I think we should point this out and show the extent of the treason at every level of our government. I think we should just name the names and let people see and decide for themselves what the relation is between our foreign adventurism that forsakes our very survival right here in our own homeland. The main thing is to focus all of the attention on us. We should always turn the conversation back home. We must condition Our people to think and speak and worry about home first. That will trigger the most powerful force and channel it to our cause, That force is the survival instinct. Pretending we have the luxury to debate foreign wars keeps that instinct buried.
We must do all we can to keep it awake and sending out the proper signal within the hearts, minds and bodies of Our people. If we do this, we will win.
My $.02
Exactly. We’re being invaded right now. Traitors invite the third-world masses to settle in the US – traitors like George Friedman, whom you mentioned, and many more – most of them Jews like Alejandro Mayorkas. This war against Iran, provoked by Israel, serves as a distraction to what is happening to our own country.
That would make for a good article. Want to write it up and send it in?
Sure. I would love to give that a shot.
“Why are the Muslims necessarily in the right in this case just because …”
I think two arguments can be made why the Muslims are less to blame in this particular case:
(1) The more powerful party usually has the initiative. It can force the weaker side to either submit or enter an escalation spiral. If the Neocon axis was determined to expel the Palestinians and overthrow Iran’s government, then the latter had no option left other than to give up or fight. “It takes two to tango” is correct, but only when there’s some symmetry of power, which isn’t between Palestine and Israel or between Iran and the US.
(2) Two ways to assess who is responsible for a conflict: First interaction & strategic intentions. In Palestine, the first interaction was when Zionists from Europe started colonizing Palestine. The Palestinians had not done anything to the AJ before that, because the two groups had not interacted before. The strategic intentions of Israel are to expel all Palestinians, create “Greater Israel” and dominate the region. The strategic intentions of the Palestinians is to get the Israelis to leave the Levant i.e. a return to the status quo from 1900 or so. In the case of Iran, the first noteworthy interaction between US and Iran was the CIA-backed 1953 coup, which led to 26 years of US-backed dictatorship that made so many enemies in Iran that it led to the Islamic Revolution of 1979. The US’s strategic intentions are to remove the greatest threat to Israel achieving its strategic goals in the region, which is currently Iran. Iranian strategic intentions are (a) to prevent that from happening and (b) establish regional dominance.
Conclusion:
The Palestinians are simply very obstinate (I wonder whether they have inherited that from their Judaean ancestors who fought the Romans way too many times) and suffer from being the most directly in the way of Israeli ambition.
The Iranians want to establish themselves as a regional power, which is why they clash with Israeli/US-interests. Yet: Even if we say that the ambition/intention is the same (dominate the region), it’s also a fact that Iran has a more legitimate claim than either Israel or the US.
“With enough Israel bashing today we may gain ourselves a formidable enemy some time in the future when we might be at our most vulnerable.” You think Jews’ views on white goys has to do with our behavior? Seems like they despise us regardless of what we do, but I take your point that they may bomb a future ethnostate.
Assuming we lack nukes ourselves on the day of secession, having Anti-Zionists instead of Isolationists in charge will make it a lot easier and more tempting for Israel nuke us right away. Maybe they will do it regardless, or maybe not. I hope for both latter cases.
Come on guys. Many of us were saying this from the beginning. We were very consistent, at least I was….we reminded all of you that Trump was just another boomer Republican, but he was just better at communicating. Every one of his policies is exactly the same as the pro business, pro war Republican establishment.
But you didn’t listen then, you won’t now. You will delete this comment. You were so desperate for a savior that you silenced any and all critiques of Trump, pretending that they were all coming from the left, when they weren’t. They were just coming from honest analysis.
All I’m saying is…don’t pretend that we don’t exist. Critiques of Trump came from all over, and you would have realized that if you allowed yourself to listen for a second.
Saviors are dangerous, guys. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don’t. It’s a mixed history and bag, like everything else.
So who should have we voted in if not Trump? Harris? Any Republican? Who exactly would have been better for the WN cause? Name one person who had a realistic chance of being elected who would not have capitulated to the Jew cause and who would also have pushed mass deportation.
Choices in life are rarely black and white but shades of gray. Trump has done great things initially such as eliminating USAID, trying to eliminate the federal education department, aggressively deporting people, trying to reverse birthright citizenship and eliminating the alphabet people from the military etc.
I wish he hadn’t bombed Iran and I truly hope he doesn’t send in ground troops. I really don’t know the rationale behind Trump’s decision but maybe he had no choice. After all he has created a lot of enemies with what he has done so far and maybe he didn’t want to take on another enemy in the form of political war mongers and Jews. Maybe he is a Jew rent boy.
Oh come on. Nobody adjacent to White Nationalism thought that Trump was a Savior.
We all knew that Trump was the least loathsome of a whole lot of very bad choices. But at least until now he has done more for us than anybody else would have, and this was encouraging.
Using USAF B-2s as an adjunct of the IAF in attacking Iran is a pretty nasty faux pas, and I hope that Trump will get plenty of pushback from his base over it. I hope this prospect is at least not too miraculous.
I am grateful every day that the Bidenistas are now gone and that both Hillary and Kamalamala never made it.
🙂
“But you didn’t listen then, you won’t now.”
You were right. I was wrong. Even though the Prime Minister of Israel can get dozens of standing ovations in Congress any time he likes I thought we Whites had more say over our fate than it turns out we do. We can be dragged into wars contrary to our racial interest regardless of what the great mass of White people think. That has been proven. I thought that President Trump would exercise some independent judgement about what was good for America or at least what was good for Israel (bearing in mind that this war might not be good for Israel). He didn’t. He played the role of a puppet of the Jews. He is Zion Don, just as you said.
I’m sorry.
Trump was not “seemingly reluctant” to do this. The US was immediately involved in missile interception, they were immediately backing Israel to the hilt rhetorically, and it barely took a week for them to join the war outright. Obviously the coordination for this attack was underway days prior to its execution. If he had any reluctance at all, he had an easy out because it hasn’t even been three months since his appointed director of national intelligence publicly stated that Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons.
Look, I don’t know how people continue to come up with copes for this. Trump is an enthusiastic Zionist. It’s his most ideologically consistent position throughout his life. He’s been supporting these same things openly at least since he was with the Reform Party. On the campaign trail in 2015 he openly said the Iran nuclear deal was a huge motivating factor for him to run. His first term frankly was more focused on Israel than anything else. On the campaign trail in 2024, he was again very open about his support for Israel. He started taking action immediately to try to strongarm colleges into expelling pro-Palestinian students. Occam’s Razor tells me that this really is a huge priority for him.
Correct. Trump has always been an open, fanatical Zionist. It’s one thing to support Israel, or England, or France. But you still must put the interests of your own country first. Not Trump. Trump has never done that. He puts Israel first, not America. That is the definition of treason.
Agree. That’s why I wrote ‘seemingly,’ implying that he wasn’t reluctant at all.
I apologize for my confusion then. It was caused by the two possible meanings of seemingly. You meant “so as to give the impression of” whereas I thought you meant “as far as one can tell based on available information.” My mistake – I was predisposed to that interpretation by seeing so many other people genuinely trying to say Trump was reluctant.
Businessman President Donald Trump became like War Criminal Bush when he like Bush, was compelled into Middle East blood feud action for Israel and he committed a very violent nasty political murder of that Iranian general. That’s not politics. That’s murder. He endangered himself and us, the people. Trump became an enemy of Iran because he did this. He knows they are after him so he probably just thinks it’s best to help the joos wipe them out, make them surrender, humiliate them, whatever stops the threat to him personally.
Been discussing DJT’s airstrike against Iranian nuclear facilities with various people, especially those of the Boomer tier. Here’s the general consensus:
Iran was responsible for the Hostage Crisis of 1979-81; Iran supported anti-US forces during the two decade Second Persian Gulf War; Iran is behind much of the terrorism in the Middle East and beyond. It is time for some payback.
Another contingent says that they voted for Trump and thus need to support him to avoid dividing the MAGA movement and giving the Left openings which they can exploit.
There is little to no consideration of the long term implications of a conflict with Iran. Look at magazine depth. How many months (or even weeks!) of missiles, fuel, spare parts, etc., does the US and its allies have stockpiled? How many reservists can be mobilized on short order? How will supply chains hold up in the event critical chokepoints (like Hormuz) are closed? Not on the table.
There are deeper political issues. Can the United States (and its NATO partners) fight a foreign war in the face of mass third world migrations? Yes, Trump is getting a handle on the borders back here in the Homeland, but given the millions of unvetted migrants invited in by the previous administration, there may indeed be numerous sleeper cells in place to be activated in the event of a wider war. Recent conflicts in Crimea, Ukraine and the Middle East show how such cells can be a major force multiplier.
And even if those cells do not exist (or were shut down by DHS) there is the wider issue of third worlders supported by hostile elites who can form an insurrectionary base in big American cities. See the recent dust-up in Los Angeles for a harbinger and consider the situation if the Marines were engaged in the Persian Gulf and thus are not in place to defend LA or NYC from rioters. You cannot fight a war on the other side of the globe when the home front is collapsing.
“War is the realm of chaos,” as the man says. The Dissident Right needs to be prepared and develop strategies to move forward in the midst of the ongoing chaos.
Correct. Iran is not our enemy. Nor is Russia. Nor is China. The enemy is internal. Once again, the Jews treacherously open our borders, allowing a foreign invasion.
Interesting, so we have the “payback” group and the “loyalty” group. The former seem to forget or willfully ignore everything the US did to Iran – like invading two of its neighbours (Afghanistan and Iraq) and keeping troops there, with the obvious intention to be able to invade Iran with ground forces. How could the Iranians not respond to that?
There is something ignoble about succumbing to contrived tribal narratives like that. White people should be better than that. I think the “loyalty” group are better people on average, but it’s sad, and they, too, are not being honest.
Been discussing DJT’s airstrike against Iranian nuclear facilities with various people, especially those of the Boomer tier. Here’s the general consensus:
Iran was responsible for the Hostage Crisis of 1979-81; Iran supported anti-US forces during the two decade Second Persian Gulf War; Iran is behind much of the terrorism in the Middle East and beyond. It is time for some payback. And those boomers should be sent, golf clubs, rascals and all, to get their balls shot off for the jews. How that for payback, Zioboomer Gary and Walter Fussbudget?
Interesting article. Sound analysis. The truth is simple, however. Once again, the US has launched a military attack against an innocent victim, without any provocation. Trump is a bully, like the bossy pig in Animal Farm, whom he greatly resembles.
The state of Israel should never have been created in the first place. It has brought disaster to all of humanity. Our uncritical support of Israel has transformed the US into an Evil Empire, just as evil as the former Soviet Union.
Israel is not even the real problem ─ the Diaspora is, and this is the most powerful right here in the United States. If one does not understand this about Zionism then he knows nothing.
Somebody could nuke Israel right off the map and the original problem would remain in force. The Zionist state is a creature of the Diaspora, and most Jews are never even going to live in Israel. At best they want some other devout Jew to make Aliyah and go live there.
Ashkenazi Jews hate Russians, Poles, and Germans in that order. If and when they have a breach with the USA, they will then hate Americans too. It might be less obvious now. As a certain Uncle once said, the vampire parasite is done once it kills its host. Overreach is what Jews have historically always done. That is what we must prepare for and successfully take advantage of in the process.
🙂
We need to get past the binary of the Israeli tail wagging the US dog (per the anti-Zionists) or the Chomsky/Berletic position of Israel as a proxy for the US empire (alongside Ukraine, Taiwan, Philippines). In truth, the US deep state is joined at the hips with the Israeli and UK deep states. See the recent “Myth of the 20th Century” podcast at 36:00 minutes to 40:00 — https://odysee.com/@myth20c:5/iran_strike:9 — There’s no need for White nationalist to demonize Israel if the “tail wagging the dog” model does not capture the true dynamic between Netanyahu and Trump, Israel and US. We need to take not so much an isolationist stance, as outlined by Mr Quinn, but rather a return to US sphere of influence circa 1900.
Which is to say: Although I didn’t care for Trump’s aggressive rhetoric a few months ago toward Canada and Denmark with respect to Greenland, in general we need to make a strategic retreat to a defensible “fortress” North America. Strategic & orderly retreat in combination with mass deportations, border security, investment in infrastructure and renewed manufacturing. Shore up the country, develop the potentialities of the core population, for the sake of posterity. Steadily withdraw from Europe, encourage European rapprochement with Russia to draw the latter away from China’s embrace. We are not going to compete successfully against China by bogging ourselves down in yet another Middle East war. Such foolish ventures and misplaced priorities are precisely what allowed China to make its rapid rise post-2000 and now eclipse us in so many areas. We need to focus on ourselves, on our own true people. And our perfidious elite needs to give up its ambitions for global empire, ambitions that are no longer realistic or attainable, if ever they were.
Good podcast by those M20C guys.
What “deep state” is there in the US other than the Council on Foreign Relations, the oligarchs/big donors, D.C.-based lobbying and the Epstein blackmail network?
The state bureaucracy is not its own power center, intelligence agencies don’t run themselves. Rather, they are tools of deep private networks using the state for their own purposes. And which group controls these networks?
The Israelis/Zionists are not the one in charge – it’s just that they’re joined at the hip with deep private networks in the US because their relatives and co-ethnics dominate those networks at the moment.
It used to be less so – there was a time when the Rockefellers were more influential and calling for fairness towards the Arabs. As a result, a certain lobby started spreading lies about the Rockefellers’ past business relation with Nazi Germany.
I would propose, more as a question than a statement, as I want your persuasion, what of the fidelity argument? Most of our educators, medical staff, and inventors have been Jewish. They created Hollywood. What would our standard of living be without them? Do we not owe them a debt of service for the services they have provided to us? What do you guys think of this?
We owe the jews nothing! All of the creations you have listed, we would have eventually created on our own. 🙃
The problem is their very high trouble-per-capita ratio. After everything that America has done for the Jews, they’ve repeatedly bit the hand that fed them. If they’d stop doing that, then we finally could have normalized relations. They need to realize which side their bread is buttered on, because the tail won’t be able to wag the dog forever, though realistically I’m not expecting miracles any time soon.
Why have I not gotten any likes on this comment?😂
Because your comment is stupid and ignorant.
Lol. I like it. None of these guys get it
We only owe them a punching in the goddamn face till our hands break. And they’ll be lucky to get off with just that and the Rudolf Hess treatment for these monstrous crimes.
DP, what debt of gratitude do the Jews owe US whites regarding our unprecedented tolerance towards them, to say nothing of sacrificing 400k men in a war they pushed us to enter against their perceived enemies as well as the hundreds of billions we have given Israel over the years?
The title says it all. It’s what I’ve been saying recently. Boomers gloating about Iran, because they think Jews are whiter and it gives them the upper hand over browns, don’t understand the Jews will happily do this to you.
It’s a thorough discussion you’ve laid out, and you’ve absolutely correctly (it’s not paranoia) thought ahead. You’ve also weaved through different ends of it, but perhaps it’s then a bit cautious about terms. I’m not worried about what term I come under – ‘anti-Zionist’,’Isolationist’. One just has to assess the situation honestly, and what you feel is what you feel.
Iran and Palestine not being ‘innocent’, how are they are supposed to behave ? How we would respond ?
Alarm… I’ve been alarmed for years. Most of the stuff Unz is posting just now about Jewish terrorism, Jewish assassinations of Western leaders including plans for Truman, Churchill, possibly Bush, I’ve been aware of for ages. I didn’t know, but guessed that Jews wouldn’t like the Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program. And apparently they made efforts to sabotage that too. I was reminded by Unz they had pointed their weapons at the Soviet Union for a long time. Their weapons are believed to already be ‘pointed’ at us, but specifically if nationalist whites broke away in some form, you can bet that will be a specific state of concern for Israel. It’s unlikely to be a massive concern for Iran.
A commenter in another thread say, ‘Iran’s entire reason for being was terrorism’. Just incredible to me how the brain can be wired by Fox news, age and this strange philo-semitic zeal that remains its own disruptive force. Everything becomes inverted.
If Jews are going to threaten the world, blackmail, murder, actively destroy nation states, all bets are off. I’m prepared to say I don’t like Seinfeld enough that I want the world blown up. I don’t dislike Arabs enough to want the world blown up. I will take wignatism over that. And yes I would temporarily align with other races to stop the entire world being blown up by Jews and their boot lickers. And I would take a policy, that we have no power to implement today, to prevent Jews globally from doing this in all kinds of ways and I couldn’t give a damn about the optics.
Who was it that said don’t stop an enemy when they are making a mistake?
Col. Douglas MacGregor is all over the corners of YouTube that I visit saying that this war will destroy Israel (and he thinks that’s a bad thing btw). Of course if Israel thinks they are going down, they may take the entire region down with the Samson option (that’s one way to get rid of the Iranian regime).
History is full of surprises.
How many diaspora jews exist I wonder. Last time I checked there were around 14 million. But of course they don’t like being asked. Jews like Dershowitz are worried that they are disappearing in the diaspora through intermarriage. I don’t think the future is too bright for God’s chosen ones. I like to think some of the Christians are right when they say Trump is the antichrist because he came in as a man of peace only to help unleash holy hell. (Maybe I’m on YouTube too much!)
What are the demographics like on X and who is our target audience?
Pick up the Good Book again and read what the Great Man had to say about Zionism. As time goes on, He is never proven any less correct about most things that matter.
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” – John 8:44
I assume you are talking about Adolf Hitler and his book?🙃
It is definitely fair to consider how it might affect the Zionist project if the United States splits into multiple countries. Hard to say how long Israel could survive without funds and military assistance from the American empire. It’s probably a safe bet that Jews will be the among the fiercest opponents of secessionist movements here, blue-state, red-state, or both, and regardless of whether the secession movements in question are explicitly racialist.
I think secession movements will go mainstream sooner than later, but at the same time, sympathy for Israel is decreasing across the political spectrum. It wouldn’t exactly be a shock if anti-Zionist and isolationist figures in both parties are targeted by the Mossad.
In a white ethnostate, obviously it would be unwise to involve ourselves in the troubles of the Middle East. Depending on the size and population of our state, we might not be strong enough to do so anyway, even if we did want to, which we shouldn’t. Foreign policy will have to center around avoiding conflict with the other state or states that exist in the former US territory, as well as Mexico and Canada.
Dave Chambers: June 23, 2025… Hard to say how long Israel could survive without funds and military assistance from the American empire…
—
It is hard to say only because dissident Whites have yet to organize to resist our replacement. Once effectively organized for own exclusive interests the “shitty little nation” will disappear. It’s putting the cart before the horse to be talking about controlling the purse strings of JOG in these still pre-revolutionary times.
—
It’s probably a safe bet that Jews will be among the fiercest opponents of secessionist movements here, blue-state, red-state, or both, and regardless of whether the secession movements in question are explicitly racialist.
—
Our cause must be implicit (understood) and explicit (clearly stated) — racially exclusive, separate — from Jews, other non-Whites, and most current Whites who will side with the multiracial American herd.
—
… I take White Nationalism seriously and believe that separation from non-whites is the only long-term solution to our people’s current problems… In our minds, we should always be seceding.
—
Thank you. This White boy will always be separating racially, not seceding.
Living here Upper East Tennessee — our state’s current 1st Congressional District, comprising the former secessionist State of Franklin, covers 11 and 1/2 counties that are still around 85% White, including its cities. At some point we can join with other contiguous White counties/districts in neighboring states in mostly White southern Appalachia. On the other hand, our state’s 9th Congressional District is just one county, Shelby, a 10-hour drive from my home here in Johnson County, The 9th District is more like 85% non-White.
The map of US states in Spencer’s 2021 “On Red State Secession” essay is actually fairly realistic, showing a dozen or so other states split racially.
This site, here, has a revealing map of Memphis’s demographics by race, but the numbers of “self-identified” claims Blacks and Whites are each 44.7% ot its population: Race, Diversity, and Ethnicity in Memphis, TN | BestNeighborhood.org
That’s nonsense. Jews and all manner of non-Whites, including racial mongrels, will self-identify as White. Can they validate their claim? Many cannot. Non-Whites are actually more like 85% of Shelby County, Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District, of which Memphis is the county seat.
Were I able to subject these so-called self-identified Memphis “Whites” to the simple three-second face test, at least half of them would come out classified as Jews, other non-Whites or mixed-race wannabe Whites. Some would still claim to be Cherokee, which isn’t even a demographic category at this site.
—
Crypsis*, however, means that among red state secessionists of all races, White Nationalists will have to avoid rocking the boat. It means practicing discretion when talking about race-realism, the Jewish Question, and other touchy topics — sort of like what many of us do now among normies.
—
“Of all races”? That is not racial separation. At least I’ve learned a new word.
*cryp·sis – noun, the ability of an organism to conceal itself, especially from a predator by having a color, pattern, and shape that allows it to blend into the surrounding environment.
“Thank you. This White boy will always be separating racially, not seceding.”
Secede first, separate second. That’s the best plan.
Spencer Quinn: June 25, 2025 Secede first, separate second. That’s the best plan.
Whatever secures a future for our race is what’s best. Who knows what plan will make that happen? Secession of red states seems to me to be the most popular plan here at C-C presently. It shouldn’t be the only plan.
I don’t see secession happening except through various multiracial state legislatures, meaning through the broken electoral process, by politicians. Maybe I’m wrong, but we do not control that anti-revolutionary process at all.
What we do control is our ability to voluntarily separate from the multiracial mess, starting at the family level, then the community level in an existing all-White area, and expand outward from there. Beginning now! That’s what I mean by separating first, ahead of states seceding from hopelessy Judaized, racially-mixed states.
Be community organizers who will follow the same sound plan. THINK RACIALLY – ACT LOCALLY.
Spencer: Donald Trump launched this attack on behalf of Israel…
Now with the entry of the United States in the war between Israel and Iran, the news has become quite terrifying. What makes it worse is that I don’t know what sources to trust…
I quit looking for sources to trust, especially in controlled news media or among social media, I trust this straightforward, no nonsense source: “No More Wars for Israel” at nationalvanguard.org.
… [W]e have totally unnecessarily made the Muslim world into enemies.
It isn’t Muslims who own the lying “mainstream” media. It isn’t Muslims who push globalism on us. It isn’t Muslims who insanely profit from the fractional reserve banking system. It isn’t Muslims who are the big Wall Street vultures and pharma exploiters. It isn’t Muslims who are promoting transgenderism, homosexuality, childlessness, and a hundred other birthrate-cratering degeneracies on our young people. It isn’t Muslims who dominate the porn industry. It wasn’t Muslims who lied about “weapons of mass destruction” and got us into a quarter century of horrific, needless war. It wasn’t Muslims who relentlessly pushed for open borders for half a century and created the 1965 immigration act that opened them, and the parallel legislation that “coincidentally” opened the borders of the entire West around the same time.
We all know who is guilty of all the above crimes against humanity, against all peoples. But, in the “free” West, if you name the Jews, you will be pursued and persecuted and hated beyond measure. What we need are men who aren’t afraid, who will tell the truth about the Jewish power structure no matter how much the Jews hate and persecute them. Men who will organize effectively to end our slavery to that power structure…
Bottom line: our race’s war is not with Islam, nor Iran, nor even with Israel, but with oeganized Jewry that is responsible for all that’s liated above. Fact!
Our race is certainly capable of effectively organizing toward the goal of long-term preservation with the best of our eligible people. First, we must have the courage to name our enemy with open and honest racial spokesmen and leaders, not poliiicians.
Do right and fear no one.
Bottom line: our race’s war is not with Islam, nor Iran, nor even with Israel, but with organized Jewry that is responsible for all that’s listed above. Fact! The Europeans would disagree with that line about islam. Muslims are absolutely an enemy who seek a global caliphate and Europe has been targeted as dar al-harb, a territorial house of war to be conquered by pisslam. Blacks and browns are worse in your personal space, the Canadians would swear indians are the worst, Californians would say amerind-mestizos, and Australians probably the maori and chinese. There are 7 primary problems of color but jews and goodgoy antiWhite traitors are the worst of the lot.
Let me sit back and smile with sarcasm.
90 years ago, we – allow me to say ‘we’ when referring to National Socialism – pondered how the White race could survive the danger represented by Jews in our societies.
The solution was ‘secession’: Jews were encouraged to emigrate (in peace time, and were considered enemies in war time).
The Jewish reaction was “how could they do this to us?”.
A century later, we – allow me to say ‘the White Race’ – are exactly at the same point – with roles inverted: WE emigrate/secede, the Jews subvert our original countries.
Spencer raises a good point about how Israel will react to the creation of a White ethnostate in North America. This makes it essential that we secure ALL of nukes in the USA prior to this. It is not out of the question that Israel and diaspora Jews would use nukes against us – a righteous nuclear holocaust to prevent another holocaust. I do believe collective Jewry is that crazy.
I think we already saw this play out, of course, in the 1930s. That was the first step.
There is just so much scum on this planet and kollective jewry is just the bloody tip of the goldberg. If the communists were so adamant about targeting the religious, the ‘bourgeoisie’, the intellectuals, the tutsis for the hutus, and the past for the Italian futurists, why not just do away with subhumanity entirely and sever the criminal element of barbarism to the void that does not port with bare-bone standards of civility and yes, the best of the newly risen White Powers should be the final authority on what’s acceptable or deathworthy on this cursed planet. No, every people does not deserve their own country and being born is not some infallible universal right to be granted to any mattoid malefactor around here.
Again, things are not as they appear in Jew-controlled media. Believe this, or not
—
Israel Suffered Extensive Damage
by Larry C Johnson
Jun 26, 2025
Despite the arduous efforts of Israeli censors to hide the devastation Iran inflicted on Israel with its barrage of ballistic missiles during the 12-Day War, information is emerging that destroys the myth that Israel had an impregnable air defense. The map at the head of this article reveals the sites targeted by Iran. Based on the videos of strikes in Haifa and Tel Aviv, I think this map accurately portrays the massive scale of the Iranian attack. For the first time in its history, Israel took a major beating.
According to various Israeli media reports, damage spanned residential buildings, scientific infrastructure (e.g., labs at the Weizmann Institute in Rehovot), the Israeli Defense Ministry complex, and commercial hubs like the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Iran also struck a military target near the Soroka Medical Center in Be’er Sheva. The medical center was hit by the blast wave, which caused extensive structural damage, a chemical leak, and dozens of injuries…
Iran also struck the following residential areas, reportedly targeting Israeli military and intelligence officials:
Bat Yam: 9 killed, ~200 wounded; high-rise apartments destroyed.
Ramat Gan: Nine buildings destroyed, hundreds displaced.
Haifa and Tel Aviv: Strikes near military HQs (“Kirya”) and civilian neighborhoods.
Iran also caused extensive damage to the Port of Haifa and the Port of Ashdod (note, I had no information on the latter when I posted yesterday), as well as the refineries at Haifa and Ashdod. Israel has maintained a complete blackout on the damage to its military and intelligence facilities, but the sites identified on the map above indicate that Iran likely enjoyed similar success as that observed in Haifa and Tel Aviv.
See the map of these successful Iranian bombings of Israel, here: Israel Suffered Extensive Damage – by Larry C Johnson
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.