145 words / 1:52:30
Matt Parrott joined Greg Johnson on this episode of Counter-Currents Radio. It is now available to download or listen to here.
Topics include:
2:04 – The new policy on H1B visas.
14:24 – Who in the Trump administration talks sense to the President?
19:58 – A history of Indian migrants in America.
24:25 – Listener question on Trump’s mental sharpness.
31:45 – The reaction of Nick Fuentes and other online right talking heads to Charlie Kirk’s death.
50:50 – The future Turning Point USA and cracking down on Antifa organizations.
58:38 – Question about Pam Bondi’s comments on hate speech.
1:08:38 – Should territorial Russia be reduced to an ethnostate of European Russians?
1:16:47 – Thoughts on Bolsonaro’s conviction.
1:24:21 – Has Greg watched M. Son of the Century?
1:32:20 – Question on the Weather Underground’s desire for white genocide.
1:39:14 – Is Trump trying to start World War Three?
1:49:59 – Farewells.
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
24 comments
Please don’t think for a second that Ramswammy is a shoe in for governor here in Ohio. The next time you’re on X and you see a Vivek post read the comments. They’ll warm your hearts.
The West is a Confederacy not an Empire
Indians, when scamming our grandparents over the phone, utilize the tactic of FUD, “Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt”. They aggressively threaten the elderly with what -could happen- if they don’t give the Indian access to their computer through Anydesk, or give access to their bank account.
When Indians start to perceive rising white racial consciousness, they likewise default to the tactic of FUD. “If you don’t take us in, China will outcompete you”, “You need us, you can’t survive without us, we do all the jobs you don’t do”, etc. They dangle the threat of western decline in front of our eyes and start to fearmonger about what -could- happen if we don’t let in an infinite amount of them and their co-patriots.
And like with a phone scam, the casual mechanism can never be explained. India itself is incapable of developing a tech industry, and the Gulf States, Israel and South Korea all have restrictive immigration policies and get by fine. All three bringing people in at their pleasure, segregating them off, and then deporting them when there’s no further use. Try to float this idea and you’ll still be met with more fear about how our “international reputation” will suffer. That’s basically like a child on the playground saying “nobody will be your friend anymore if you don’t let me play your Playstation!”
Whites are uniquely susceptible to FUDding it seems, maybe it’s because we’re more likely to take what they’re saying at face value. All through the cold war third world countries exploited this with both the Soviet Union and the United States. Foreign aid wasn’t really done entirely out of compassion, thirdie countries played up both sides and stirred the pot of FUD to make both the United States and the Soviet Union compete for giving out gibs. Egypt being the prime example, it’s how they managed to weasel their way into billions of dollars of patronage buxx “foreign aid” to this day.
It might be something that’d be worth further investigation, Indians and FUDing. God knows we’re going to have this conversation every six months from here on out, and it’d be useful to make people aware that what they’re doing is a scam tactic. The same scam tactic they utilize on our elderly. Reframing the conversation this way helps people perceive the issue correctly.
No longer using the “podcast” tag?
I have difficulty with this negative talk against East Indians. They are not like that at all. Perhaps I am not of the white nationalists. Perhaps I am of the gooks.
😱
I don’t have anything against them other than getting a call center in Hyderabad whenever I need to call technical support for some reason.
Once in the 1990s, I went to pick up my late Uncle, then a programing engineer at the Motorola corporate office in Phoenix (now being torn down and probably a superfund cleanup site) to go to dinner at the end of the day ─ nice Indian restaurant across the street ─ so I was waiting outside the door and literally all of the Motorola engineers leaving for the day were Pajeets.
The idea of putting a steep bounty on H-1B visas that corporations must pay for the privilege of importing cheap labor from overseas should work wonders at reducing it.
Also, the New American University model of importing Chinese and Indian students for the school’s earnings from their tuition must be ended too. Firms like Motorola were actually subsidizing the educational costs for their foreign workforce.
Nobody is giving subsidies to the White local kids who are trying to make it through college and medical school and competing with diversity hires. The locals are ethically supposed to pay their exorbitant student loans. How is this a meritocracy? No, White Replacement is what it is.
🙂
Agree, change the hostile incentive structure and most will leave of their own accord. No need for unnecessary demagoguery. For example the Sikh that caused the wreck was awful, but that is not a general trait of the group. Whites cause lots of wrecks and are often drunk at the wheel, like the guy Adrian mentioned. I thought the things we said were supposed to be based in reason.
Russia might be a multiethnic or multi-racial Empire dating from Soviet or Tsarist times, but if the non-European parts of the empire East of the Urals were ever cut loose, how could those territories be prevented from being gobbled up by Red China seeking land, resources, and fresh water?
I guess the Mongolians, etc. could be left with some nukes, but that seems like a very risky prospect.
As far as International Law, I think it is important not to valorize this too much if at all. In reality, there is no such thing as International Law and never has been.
What we call International Law is in reality treaty agreements between sovereign Nation-States living in a natural world where one is in perpetual conflict with all others, until they do form treaty agreements which can be either transitory or develop permanence, depending on what avantages are conferred to each and whatever customs and habits are codified for other reasons.
Theoretically all sovereignties that reciprocally recognize each other are separate-but-equal, although some are always “more equal than others” in reality, so this is not so simple and depends upon a lot of factors. Superpowers always make their own rules, and it takes very strong coalitions or a bevy of other States as de facto Superpowers to oppose them.
After 1919, the victorious Allies, particularly the World Redeemer himself, Thomas Woodow Wilson, sought to create “one-world government,” or at least an international body dedicated to collective security. But the reality is that these efforts were only dedicated to pursuing the geopolitial and economic goals of the Entente, which still had serious war-debts to pay back to its creditor, the United States.
A lasting peace is best when wars are ended with bilateral agreements rather than by unilateral tribute ─ a schoolboy mistake for the enfeebled President, whose everlasting Peace had a War-Guilt clause.
War simply cannot be pontificated away, which is exactly what Kellogg-Briand tried to do in 1928. The Victors and their Vassals tried to put ink to paper renouncing War as an instrument of national policy.
Well, that will never happen so long as Nation-States exist on this Earth, and pretty much all nations do resist being put into the blender by their betters.
Furthermore, conflict can be abrogated to some extent and alternative conflict resolution mechanisms worked through by those who feel it is useful and important ─ but so long as human beings draw breath, the world will never be free from conflict. It will always be with us from the simple to sublime.
The damage of War can sometimes be mitigated, but trying to “outlaw” War is a fool’s errand if there ever was one. We might as well wait for Jesus to return.
The same is true of War Crimes.
Whether high-minded or not, you can have treaty agreements to codify how among certain members things are meant to be done ─ good examples being the Hague and Geneva Convention agreements, which can even be useful more broadly ─ but to say there is such an objective thing as War Crimes outside of these agreement parameters is dubious, even if you choose to call it Crimes Against Humanity.
War itself is immoral or a “crime against humanity” and always will be. This does not undermine the value of diplomacy. Reciprocity is an extremely good motivator and both sides benefit. The only real peace or conflict resolution is when participants jointly agree to respect their mutual interests, and in so doing sacrifice some of their wants which are non-essential needs.
And the longer these agreements are in place and mutually advantagous, the stronger the basis for this comity. The United States and Great Britain have not been at war since the unpleasantness of 1812, and the prospect of an actual war between the two sovereignties is today almost unthinkable.
If on the world stage you have rival states that are close to imminent Superpower status like Germany from 1918-1939, but not so deemed by their competitor states as “equals before the world bar,” then there will be tremendous conflict and inevitable war.
After 1939, as far as Albion was concerned, they had the “moral duty” to destroy any Nation-State or coalition that did not completely leave the European continent balkanized so that England could freely pursue their overseas colonial interests. It did not have to be Germany, either; the “existential threat” had historically been France, and Spain before that. In the day, the Albionese press had dubbed Napoleon Bonaparte as the Antichrist.
So after the new Antichrist was defeated in 1945, the new messiahs of the victorious powers thought that a “United Nations” of the world could be created with more ink on paper that would now have a collective security enforcement arm. The modern Global Policeman was born.
But the UN proved to be another folly of cat herding ─ and even with a new gadget called the Atomic Bomb in play, this new supreme diety and “destroyer of worlds” in reality only maintained a strategic loss from the last famous victory. A policeman’s work is never done.
The Marxists and Liberals in the partnership all wanted the Gadget to be tucked away in the steamer trunks of all of the big players, not just Roosevelt/Truman and Churchill, to include also Stalin and later Mao. For all practical purposes other than for strategic deterrence, this effectively rendered the big superweapon practically useless.
Anyway, Internationalism is only a little less fraught with problems today as it was the better part of a century ago, when the Eastern Liberal elites were true believers until called out by people like Senator Joe McCarthy.
Since the founding of the Republic, the only authentic American foreign policy is one of Nationalism, where the country minds its own affairs and “seeks not monsters to destroy” as John Quincy Adams put it, avoiding “entangling alliances,” as the founding President once counselled, and concentrating instead on the country’s own authentic national interests, judiciously using its powerful weapons, and its mighty military host, sparingly.
Otherwise, at some time the American Nation-State will simply not be able to support the costly imperial “wars that never end.”
🙂
How has Mongolia not been gobbled up by China?
Truth is, given the present course, all of that territory will fall to China in one fell swoop.
Some Chinese expansion might be inevitable.
Lake Baikal is North of the Mongolia border in SE Siberia. It has more fresh water than all of the Great Lakes combined, over 20 percent of the freshwater supply on the Earth’s surface. The Chinese need that water. They see a milkshake and they will bring a long straw.
Should the Chinese be allowed to have it? I don’t know.
I do like the idea of European Russia more closely associated with the European West. It would defuse a lot of the “pseudomorphic” Asiatic development in the “Russian soul” that Spengler talked about.
🙂
Most people I know would not choose to be enemies with Russia. But sometimes your enemy chooses you.
… and then Charlie Kirk got assassinated and the mass media forgot about Iryna Zarutska …
Not me though. Not any White with a decent attitude. We won’t forget our sisters and our brothers who are being violently victimized every day.
We must learn from the example of the murder of Iryna Zarutska. She was killed by blacks – not only the perp, but also the politicians, judges and prosecutors. All (or most) of them are black. We are in a race war. Racial segregation is one way to handle this problem.
About the criminally insane; It always seems odd to me, that someone being insane is considered a defense. I understand that the idea is, that a person who cannot understand that what he is doing is wrong, cannot be held accountable for his actions.
But such a person is actually far more dangerous than one who does understand the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. For he cannot be controlled except through physical force.
If they are found criminally insane, the liberals will acquit them and release them from the nuthouse as soon as they can get away with it. Liberals want them to kill again. The correct solution is to execute them, without undue delay.
Yeah, the logic is that they will now be put into the mental health lockup indefinitely as an unaccountable danger to themselves and others. True mental illness is rarely cured.
I don’t know if the mental institution is really an easier life than supermax prison. But I don’t understand the logic of a Life sentence without parole or a sentence of hundreds of years.
For crimes of this seriousness, the Death Penalty is the only answer.
The animal that stabbed Iryna Zarutska on the Light Rail and the Charlie Kirk assassin should both be put down permanently.
🙂
There are cases in which a diminished responsibility defense makes sense.
Consider McNamara’s morons, or Project 100,000. In the 1960’s and to shovel more human meat into the Vietnam War the United States government instituted a project to recruit soldiers who would previously have been below military mental or medical standards. One effect of this was to place deadly weapons and equipment in the hands of morons, and tell them to do things like stand sentry duty, without the ability to distinguish reliably between friend and foe, or even the ability to fully understand the nature of their duty and that shooting people in the wrong uniforms and speaking English was BAD. Unfortunate incidents followed.
Friends of soldiers slaughtered by their own side sometimes thought the bloody morons should have gotten death, and sometimes they enforced that, legally or not. But in these cases a reasonable view is that these men didn’t have the ability to avoid disaster in the situations they were in, and it was the fault of the U.S. government for putting them in those situations. In cases like these, society really is to blame.
That’s not what’s happening now.
The short clip of the Weather Underground’s talk about killing White babies was an excerpt from a six part television series on PBS from 1991 called “Making Sense of the Sixties.” The “last above ground convention” of the Weather Underground mentioned by the sociology professor was the Flint War Council held in Flint, Michigan in late December 1969. (I think I mistakenly said it was the mid-70s in my original post, which was incorrect.) This is the full episode. The sociology professor appears at the 21:50 timestamp toward the end of the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGeFPzFNkQg
Start chanting Gas the Joos! Gas the Joos!
Then I’ll bet the talk about the White Race being “the cancer of history” (((Susan Sontag))) ends quickly, with all the Shlomos scrambing for the exits.
The flag is high; the ranks are closing in. LOL.
🙂
How long before a federal judge overrides this?
Probably not long, but the judges have been moving in a better direction if the momentum can continue.
🙂
Does anyone know where the video is of the “Professor/WeatherUnderground/Murder plot” mentioned in the audio? Thanks in advance!!
Scroll up to comment #9 by Eva Stoughton. She explains where the video came from and the timestamp it can be found on in that video. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.