The confluence of the Trump administration’s sudden reluctance to release the Jeffrey Epstein files and the MAGA base’s understandably hostile reaction has sadly brought out the worst in Donald Trump. His response so far has been to double down, deny that there is anything of interest in these files, and then lash out at his supporters for challenging him. Such irascible tone-deafness amounts to bad politics and is what you get with a leader who thinks only about himself. Instead of canned, inoffensive, committee-approved rhetoric, we get unfiltered freestyling from a billionaire who fancies himself the smartest guy in the room.
So far during Trump 2.0 this has been a good thing. Trump does think outside the box, he knows how to push leftists’ buttons, and he also knows what’s best for America—which, whether it’s deliberate or not, is also best for white Americans. Leftist strongholds such as NPR, PBS, and the Department of Education are now on the chopping block. LGBTQ propaganda is being marginalized, birthright citizenship is on its way out, Boer South Africans are now refugees, USAID has been dismantled, the border is secure, and deportations are moving forward, including self-deportations. All this and Alligator Alcatraz. I can go on and on with Trump’s victories, which so far have been both political and metapolitical. He has stretched the Overton window far to the right, further than I ever thought possible. We are indeed living in remarkable times.
However, such freethinking has a downside in that it won’t prevent Trump from laying the occasional egg. That’s what he did during his spat with Elon Musk. That’s what he did with his recent attack on Iran. And that’s what he’s doing with the Epstein files right now. In the first two instances, one can downplay Trump’s transgressions somewhat. It seemed to me that in their feud, Musk was the more undignified party. As for the attack on Iran, it came off without a hitch, few if any were killed, and it didn’t go nearly as far as Israel or the neocons would have wanted. It’s as if Trump did the bare minimum to fulfill his commitment to Israel. Yes, these are not good things, but they could have been worse.
The Epstein fiasco, on the other hand, cannot be spun like that. Trump and his people were all clamoring to release the famous pedo-pimp’s client list, and then suddenly they weren’t. “Part 1” of the files, which they released a few months ago, had been redacted; the prison footage they released more recently had been doctored. And if this wasn’t sketchy enough, they then began offering lame excuses and expecting their MAGA base to buy it. So the files are boring, are they? Nothing really happened, huh? Jeffry Epstein really did kill himself, did he? And we are not worthy of the great Donald Trump’s leadership if we believe otherwise?
Oof.
This is not good. Perhaps it’s not as disastrous as one would think, given that the Democrats aren’t eager to release those files either, despite their present posturing, but fractures among Republicans could prove pesky during the midterms if they can suppress enthusiasm or if Musk’s American Party gains any steam. Time will tell, of course. Until then we can only hope that this Epstein mess will either resolve or blow over.
But what to make of the issue itself? Is it a betrayal by Trump? Can it be chalked up to cowardice and mendacity? Or is it a good thing to keep Epstein’s secrets under wraps? (Note that the possibility of the Trump administration actually telling the truth isn’t even an option.) Being an outsider to all this, I naturally have no idea and can only speculate. However, it would help to put things in perspective if we could organize our thoughts on the matter. Either Trump has good reasons to suppress the files or he has bad reasons. If he has good reasons, then MAGA needs to lay off of him and accept realistically that they are not going to get everything they want out of his otherwise excellent presidency. I’m sure many of us would gladly remain ignorant of everything Epstein did if it meant continuing mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, and keeping the border secure.
On the other hand, if Trump has bad reasons, then we need to keep up the pressure to get those files released. After all, Jeffrey Epstein was a vile man who committed vile crimes and enabled other vile people to commit vile crimes as well. But what would constitute bad reasons? One would be that Trump’s personal fortune is somehow at stake. Another would be that he is somehow implicated in all of this. Another would be to protect the shadowy globalist ring of oligarch pedophiles who control things behind the scenes because he is their poofy-haired golem-lackey. So he’s either greedy, corrupt, evil or a combination of all three. I think this basically runs the gamut of bad-reason possibilities. If any of it is true, Trump should be impeached forthwith, and Trumpism should then be carried forward on the shoulders of JD Vance. We could do a lot worse.
None of this passes the sniff test for me though. For one, while Trump has many flaws, nearly all of them are obvious—and this is one reason why I like him. What you see is pretty much what you get with Trump. He’s a philandering, overbearing, egotistical, abusive, and erratic attention hound. And we knew this before he ran for president in 2015. Has he really changed much since then? If so, it’s only been for the better. Yes, Americans—especially white ones—had reason to feel somewhat disappointed after his first term because he had made plenty of mistakes and blew off more than a few of his promises. However, in hindsight we can chalk much of that up to political inexperience and the fact that some of Trump’s own people were conspiring against him. This all came to light during the 2024 campaign. In his second term, Trump has really made an effort to keep his promises. So the idea that he’s doing something truly insidious in suppressing the Epstein files seems a little farfetched for me.
Another reason I’m not sold on the bad reason thesis is that not one of Trump’s people has resigned in protest—Dan Bongino and Kash Patel in particular. For years, these guys have been clamoring for the Epstein files. This was an important thing for them; they are on record saying so. Because of that I have a hard time believing that they would meekly give that up because Trump doesn’t want his fortune to dip below $2 billion or because wants to keep a lid on some long-forgotten ignominious escapade he had had with an underaged girl. Even if Trump gave no reason at all for ordering such an about face, I still would not expect so many people to go along with it. Epstein’s crimes were too stomach churning for that, in my opinion.
Finally, Trump himself would not have run for president by promising to release the Epstein files if he had bad reasons not to release them. Bad reasons imply complicity and that Trump is protecting himself or whoever pulls his strings by keeping us in the dark. Why run at all if you’re so vulnerable? And if you’re vulnerable to begin with, why make yourself more vulnerable by promising to release the Epstein files?
The bad reason thesis just doesn’t add up for me.
This means then that Trump has good reason not to release the Epstein files. No, he doesn’t have good reasons to gaslight and insult his base. But that’s just Trump being Trump. We know he can act this way. Just ask Rosie O’Donnell or Jeb Bush. There is a reason why people hate him so much. I think his base should simply not take Trump seriously when he plays the highhanded prima donna like this. In the software business, a bug isn’t a bug if the manufacturer makes everyone aware of the bug ahead of time. That Donald Trump can act like an abusive asshole is a bug. But it’s a bug we all know about. So it’s not really a bug, is it?
As for the good reasons Trump is holding back the Epstein files, your guess is as good as mine, and they all involve some apocalyptic scenario. Some say he or his family have been credibly threatened. Others say that faith in the government would utterly collapse if people knew the truth. For all we know, someone in Tel Aviv is threatening to leak highly sensitive state secrets to the Chinese if the Epstein files were to ever see the light of day.
If Trump has good reason not to release the Epstein files, wouldn’t we need better reasons to override these good reasons if we want them released? If so, what would these better reasons be? Justice for Epstein’s victims who have already received millions in compensation? Some of these crimes are over two decades old, and it’s not like Epstein is going to commit any more of them. Yes, justice is a good reason to release the files, but is it better than Trump’s reasons not to? Trump apparently doesn’t think so, and I trust him a lot more than I would Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, or Barack Obama.
Another better reason could be to bring the real perpetrators to justice—the shadowy, super rich figures who most likely used Epstein to trap and compromise world leaders and influential people in order to control them—a global mafia with the ability to assassinate people in prison while making it look like suicide. Yes, it would be great if we would bring such people to justice. But what if such people control the justice system? Then what? Are they going to incarcerate themselves? What if they could launch a coup or an insurrection somewhere and really destabilize things? What if they could initiate a world-wide depression or unleash bioweapons? What if they have access to nukes?
For all we know, Trump has excellent reasons to keep us in the dark over Epstein.
What it boils down to is that something happened. At some point a few months ago, the Trump people finally realized that they had made a big mistake by including Epstein on their to-do list. After this, they were forced to awkwardly backtrack while rotten eggs and tomatoes splattered against their smiling faces. I’m sure it wasn’t fun. But whatever happened spooked them. People must have realized that there are forces at work which are greater than the President of the United States, and that whatever the Trump administration could gain from airing Epstein’s dirty laundry would not be worth the hell that would come their way if they did. I can’t think of a better explanation.
If this is true, then who or what has the kind of ruthless, murderous, international power to control US presidents, even one as recalcitrant as Trump? Obviously, it’s Israel along with the upper echelons of the Jewish diaspora. These are the only people we can point to who have such power; Lord knows, gentiles have been talking about such things for about 150 years now, certainly since Jacob Schiff helped finance the Japanese war against the Russians in 1905, and then later the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. And Epstein’s plethora of links to the Israeli elite through his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell makes such connections all too tempting. So sure, we can fight the power and demand the files anyway. But what makes any of us think that we’d win the fight if Trump doesn’t think we’d win the fight? Trump knows a lot more about this than we do. What if the Epstein files are so crucial to Israel’s power and influence that they would commit atrocities outside the Middle East to keep them from being revealed? What would you expect Trump or any sitting president to do if someone working on behalf of the Mossad were to present him with such an ultimatum? What would be the path of least resistance in such a scenario? Running his mouth about Epstein anyway and risking serious carnage or shutting up? Trump obviously picked the latter option, and I am not convinced he was wrong.
Now, it doesn’t feel good to come down on the same side of an issue as Ben Shapiro. Both he and I want us to move past Epstein, it’s true. But Shapiro does it dishonestly because he secretly cares most about Israel, and likewise wants us to swallow the Trump administration’s lies. I, on the other hand, do it honestly (albeit, pseudonymously) because I think letting Epstein slide would be better for North American whites in spite of the Trump administration’s lies. Why? Because Trump is already doing a great job for white people. Giving him grief over Epstein will only impede him moving forward. If this were any other president since Ronald Reagan, I would say burn it all down. But not Trump. He’s making so many of the right decisions, he’s choosing all the right enemies, and he has the clout this time to make it all stick. If we hamstring him over Epstein and lose seats in Congress in 2026 as a result, we would be pulling defeat from the jaws of victory.
Is this what we want?
Or maybe we should just take the L on Epstein and let Trump keep doing what he’s doing.
I’ll let you go with one final scary thought. I’ve seen the venom aimed at Trump and his people coming from the right over all of this. Some of it is utterly vicious. This is the kind of vitriol we should be leveling at the left, the people who wish to hasten the demise of the white race worldwide. Instead, however, we’re leveling it at Attorney General Pam Bondi because she’s prioritizing America’s fentanyl problem over Jeffrey Epstein—as if fentanyl overdoses weren’t already a major problem for American whites. Again, is this really what we want? Because if it is, then we shouldn’t be surprised when Donald Trump takes the hint one day and decides to stop enforcing the border and deporting illegal aliens—just to spite us. If his base turns on him, why wouldn’t he turn on them right back? We know he’s erratic and egotistical. Can we really trust him not to do that?

103 comments
The MAGA base needs a big purge of its Q-tards.
How best to do this exactly, I don’t know, but hopefully it gets worked out before the Midterms.
The Left and the Democrats are running with the nonsense narrative that Trump has suddenly lost all his support and that there is blood in the water now that things are getting done on immigration, the courts, etc.
Trump is right to double-down, and his lieutenants seem to get it. He is the one who is and who needs to be in charge of his agenda.
In digital logic, Nothing precedes Something. The “null hypothesis” means that, lacking real evidence, a nothing-burger is more likely than an imagined something-burger.
It means that before you can realistically have a festively-clad pizza and bagel conspiracy of Joos operating in limitless underground caverns lurking amongst telepathic alien reptiles and greasy pedophiles, you have to establish this with more evidence than hypothetical files that are somehow never released.
How many JFK shooters, again? How many do we need to sell the next story?
Sometimes the correct answers are not necessarily the most salacious ones.
🙂
I honestly never thought I’d see commenters at CC running cover for Israeli Mossad blackmail rings that specifically targeted underage White girls but here we go.
You do realise that Trump can release the Epstein files and do the other stuff he promised? It’s not an either or.
There are many people for whom their only ideology is “Trump supporter.” Electorally, we need these people because circumstance often makes them fellow travelers to many WN goals. In terms of intellectual engagement, it’s best just to ignore them when they start telling you Trump isn’t releasing the Epstein files to save America or that the H-1B program is secretly based.
If Trump can accomplish remigration and mass deportations and continue to shift the Overton window in a positive direction, it will justify having put up with his unsavory personality, many policy shortcomings, and the segment of his base that maintains this embarrassing cult of personality around him.
Who’s running cover for Mossad?
If you can prove that case, please do so.
If not, then no amount of wishful thinking is going to put a second shooter at the Grassy Knoll with Mossad or CIA fingerprints all over it.
Imaginary files is not how evidence works.
🙂
Scott: July 19, 2025 Who’s running cover for Mossad? If you can prove that case, please do so. Imaginary files is [sic] not how evidence works.
—
The Epstein files are not imaginary, Scott. Those who have the evidence give cover to the guilty by always saying:
On the advice of counsel, pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, I respectfully decline to answer your question because should answer I and others who cover for the Mossad would be in deep doo doo.
First of all, it is the Q-tards who are the ones who say things like “trust the plan” and back Trump no matter what he says or does. They’re not the ones calling for the release of the files; it’s the true-believer crowd that rejects any criticism of Trump.
Second, the claim that “you have to establish this with more evidence than hypothetical files that are somehow never released” is deliberately obfuscating. The files are not hypothetical; the circumstantial evidence that they exist or existed is overwhelming. The very people calling them into question now were heralding their existence just a short time ago. The FBI has files on every Joe Blow who ever sent a mean tweet; what would they have on an operation like Epstein’s? And the reason we want the full files is because they will likely provide some of the proof we desire; it is very likely they will add to the mountain of evidence that there is excessive Jewish involvement in our government. To say that we’re somehow irrational to want the government to release evidence that supports our theory because we haven’t proven our theory yet is downright twisted.
And mocking the very harmful Jewish influence in the US as “festively-clad pizza and bagel conspiracy of Joos operating in limitless underground caverns lurking amongst telepathic alien reptiles and greasy pedophiles” is pretty darn insulting to those of us who are aware of this influence and wish to counter it.
Charles Lindbergh had the right idea when calling out the warmongers in 1941 before Pearl Harbor. He put a lot on the line.
I’m happy to see Diaspora Jews purged from U.S. public influence, especially for ample good cause and their innately-divided loyalties; that is the only way to beat Zionism, in fact.
A certain Austrian-born statesman explained much of this in a book written about a century ago.
But what set of imaginary files will do this?
The Truth is vitally important, but in spite of the Bible, George Lincoln Rockwell observed that the Truth alone will never set you free. (Rockwell was drawing inspiration from another source than John 8:32 but not quite so old.)
The Truth is that George W. Bush did not need real WMDs to invade Iraq and actually depose Saddam, which his father forgot to do and probably cost him the 1992 reelection. Everybody knew that the WMD issue was phony in 2003, but for some reason it mattered less than Clinton getting impeached earlier for lying about wagging his dog.
Israel provides the Diaspora Jews with the cover of national Sovereignty.
Thus, Israel’s atomic bomb is not “illegal” because that “sh*tty little country” does carry the flag of Sovereignty, and no other nations that do have diplomatic relations with it have (so far) successfully held them to signing any nuclear non-proliferation agreements ─ so Netanyahoo and crew can official deny their nuclear arsenal all they want and nobody will call them out.
That should change ─ and it does not require hypothetical files that will ultimately go nowhere, just somebody unimpeachable like a Lindbergh making an America First case. Maybe I am wrong, but I do not think that Q-tards have the chops.
So the best way to reduce nuclear tensions in the Middle East is to actually get the Israeli nuclear program itself onto the diplomatic table and NOT go straight to smartbombing Iran, which will ultimately fail if the goal is really to keep the Mullahs from owning nuclear technology.
It would not take much nuking to destroy Israel, and other wild cards like North Korea probably could assist Iran with obtaining nukes if they really wanted to. So small nuclear states walk a fine line here, with the superpowers still calling the shots.
The fact that with Trump’s fortunate reelection, Jews are NOT scrambling for the nearest planes, trains, boats and automobiles to hide in Israel like gangster Meyer Lansky when caught, is proof enough that Trump is NOT our guy. (Neither was JFK, but that’s another subject.)
I don’t see how imaginary intelligence files changes any of that nor puts “our guy” into power.
JFC, some people think that all you have to do to win this thing is to call out Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein as Joos (duh) and show up for the Latin Rite mass once in awhile.
Don’t blame me, but that is exactly what will NOT work, and I think a certain Austrian-born statesman understood this.
🙂
The files are not imaginary. A couple of them have been leaked, and they’re embarrassing as hell to dozens of celebrities, politicians, and greasy oligarchs. Some may have innocent reasons for associating with Epstein, but the rest have good reason to squirm.
What’s most apposite to this story is what Sydney Pollack told Tom Cruise in Eyes Wide Shut: you have no idea who you are dealing with and if you did you’d be very scared. To be more powerful than whoever runs the New York Prison System is to be pretty powerful indeed. I know Scott said he hung himself on a doorknob but I for one am not buying it.
Pretty much anybody who is anybody in Hollywood or the Davos-set deserves to “squirm,” but we already know that. We’ve known it for decades in fact.
What we don’t have is actionable evidence nor any proof that Trump is sitting on anything useful.
We already knew that Nixon had conspired with the Watergate burglars, but he was no longer the President regardless of his reasons or lack thereof.
Maybe there is a secret file somewere that actually slays the JQ dragon, but so far that is only wishful thinking and goes nowhere.
🙂
He’s not ‘in charge of his agenda’, the jews are. That’s the reason why Trump has to humiliate himself over this. Either that or he’s a completely ill-informed idiot who never bothered to find out whether there was anything substantive that could be released all while he pimped release as an agenda item.
Trump’s situation is not the he won’t release the Epstein material, it’s that he’s not allowed to release the Epstein material because Epstein and Maxwell and Dershowitz are all jews and all the non-jews are famous and need to be kept in check.
The power of blackmail over a blackmailed subject ends when the blackmail material is released.
Releasing the Epstein material would end the power of that dossier over the people the jews have cultivated as asset over many decades.
Epstein was a flunky. He worked for – and received assistance from – figures who are only hinted at in his public history. Trump is just another flunky for the same people. Everyone around him is either a jew or a Zionist non-jew.
“The joos” or “the jooz.”
That’s lame. Anyone who writes joos or jooz is implying that those who pronounce “jews” that way are some ignorant yahoos, despite that any dictionary you consult would give jooz or joos as the phonetic of “jews.” You’re implying that there is another way, the real sophisticated way, to pronounce “jews” other than jooz or joos. Ok, what is that pronunciation? “Throat wobbler mangrove”?
It is lame; childish, even. Whenever I see someone write “joos” (or even more cringe, “duh joos”) and studiously avoid at any point writing the actual word “Jews”, the impression I get is that the writer is either too timid to use the actual word or is in complete denial of Jewish power and influence.
‘duh’ is retardspeak but joos! is a lame and possibly failed attempt at mockery a group who get off on us seeing them as Darth Skynet Magneto Ultron Vader, which they’re not. We don’t deny or diminish their power, just mock them as two inches tall. I’ve picked up Yockey’s habit of never capitalizing names of groups or people one holds in total contempt, like jews, blacks, or muslims. Never Whites. And they absolutely notice.
That’s fair enough, Uncle S! I was looking at it from a different angle. I read a forum regularly where a frequent commenter/troll makes fun of people who bring up jewish (you’ve already converted me to lower-case!) influence as some kind of crazy-eyed, low-IQ, swastika-tattooed tinfoil hat wearers. He/she/it writes “duh joos”, as if WNs have some kind of bizarre affliction and are seeing “jews” in their morning cornflakes. I’ve always used uppercase for “White”, as in people, and switched a few years ago to lowercase “black”, for negroes, after it became the stylistic standard to do the reverse. Thanks for your insight and I always appreciate your very pointed commentary.
We’re only six months into his term. People anymore have the attention spans of gnats. The Epstein debacle will be long forgotten by the time the midterms roll around. Rumor has it that Trump is going after Brennan and Comey. I’ll believe it when I see it, but if he does Epstein is in the rear view mirror.
Nothing has staying power like salacious sex scandals. Nothing. But the jews who run Trump don’t care. It doesn’t matter who wins the mid-terms, Whites lose and jews win. The only genuinely White choice is nullification, autarky and walking of the judeo-darkie plantation.
I think that only works if you walk entirely off the plantation. If you obey their laws and pay them taxes then they won’t care if you withdraw from voting.
My guess is that behind the scenes, some sort of deal was arranged to drop it. Anyway, the unredacted Epstein black book and the unredacted Epstein flight list aren’t exactly a secret. They’re out there for anyone who knows where to look for leaked documents like that. I don’t believe that everyone named in them is dirty – no doubt there are some exceptions – but questions should be asked, and the whole thing stinks to high Heaven. Sunshine is the best disinfectant. I’ll add that Bongino is quite livid and has threatened to resign.
And finally: Cleaned Slate – StoneToss
Sex with nearly-legal and barely-legal prostitutes isn’t pedophilia.
The blackmail victims could have been surreptitiously administered inhibition drugs. If anyone possesses such a thing, it would be Mossad and this type of operation would be when such a drug would be used.
The only pertinent meaning of the Epstein Affair is that it indicates America and the West are enslaved by “Israel.” The evident combination of world class blackmail, extortion and bribery has facilitated this. Netanyahu, the first foreign visitor to the White House, openly extorted Trump and Vance with gold and silver pagers. Iran was bombed. He pays a second visit to be gifted a cover-up that would expose the method America came to be enslaved by his people.
Meanwhile, Israel has an illegal nuclear weapon program which makes funding Israel illegal. They have nuclear weapons aimed at European Civilization in the ultimate act of extortion, The Samson Option, but Trump orders a (very) preemptive strike on Iran.
The same coercion that orders Trump to cover up the ultimate Mossad blackmail operation is responsible for the ongoing genocide by racial replacement occurring to the global White population. It is responsible for other subversive genocidal actions such as the promotion of miscegenation, homosexualization, and the sterilization of children in Western nations.
We also have the expansion of Greater Israel that includes the mass ethnic cleansing of Ukraine, mass death in the Middle East and the real and growing possibility of WW3.
If this intolerable source of accumulating and unprecedented evils isn’t put to rest, we will be.
“Another would be to protect the shadowy globalist ring of oligarch pedophiles who control things behind the scenes because he is their poofy-haired golem-lackey.”
That’s right.
President Trump has said that Israel used to control the Congress of the United States of America totally, and rightly so.
That was not just a statement about power; that was a moral statement. This is where Donald Trump stands. Jewish power over the goyim should be absolute. The Jewish state rules, and to the extent of a difference of interests any gentile state, including the United States of America, drools.
The Epstein conspiracy, including the continuing cover-up that President Trump is part of, was and is a Jewish conspiracy to corrupt and dominate Whites.
From the Jewish supremacist moral viewpoint of President Trump. that Jewish power structure must be protected. President Trump is protecting that power structure.
“At some point a few months ago, the Trump people finally realized that they had made a big mistake by including Epstein on their to-do list.”
Virginia Giuffre, the best known accuser of Epstein, died on April 25, 2025, following a traffic accident that occured on the 31 of March (or a few days before). About 1,400 people die from traffic accidents in Australia per year [1]. Given a population of about 28 million people, this means a rate of roughly 5 per 100,000 – or a probability of 1 to 20,000. Over a 20 year period, the probability would still only add up to 0.1%.
—
Another weird facet is this: https://nitter.poast.org/disclosetv/status/1945254920568873156#m
The man standing next to Trump and apparently finding the former’s gaslighting of the American public incredibly funny is billionaire Howard Lutnick, current Secretary of Commerce and a former neighbour of Epstein [2].
—
Lastly, I can only recommend reading one of those older Trump biographies that detail his father’s NYC business connections through which Trump build his corporate empire. I can only conclude that Donald Trump has been “in bed with the goblins” (as Alex Jones would say [3]) since day one. Oh well
[1] https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/injury/transport-accidents
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20211218160818/https://www.crainsnewyork.com/real-estate/unraveling-web-jeffrey-epsteins-manhattan-real-estate
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kAEoCHANYY
You know, I am beginning to believe that the whole Epstein affair is something of a nothing burger. I’m beginning to think that Epstein appeared as he wanted to appear. He wanted to be this. He wanted to be the shadowy underworld figure connected with Mossad and blackmailing people, but he really wasn’t. I was reading a little bit about his background during all of this discussion the other day, and do you know that he was hired at Dalton school without a math degree or an undergraduate degree of any sort? One of his former students, a doctor with a Jewish name, said that they really learned no math in his class and they just had fun and everybody got an A. I believe that Epstein was a person with no real abilities, and a very big ego complex. This is a pattern in Jewish society, which we glimpse from time to time. Basically, Jews, particularly in the northeast, have a very rigid status structure and they’re very internally competitive. Other exemplars might be Madoff and Stephen glass of the movie shattered glass fame. They said that in Stephan glass’s little enclave in Long Island, if your child was not a doctor or a lawyer, you close the curtains, it was as if they were dead. There’s an immense pressure for status among these people, and people who are average without exceptional abilities, are often tempted to fake eminence in order to win approval. The problem is, that the Jews promote one another. They will make you into what you want to be, so much as they are able. So we have someone like Glass writing nonsense for a major magazine for decades, and no one fact checked or did anything about it till there was pressure from the outside. (And then they make a movie implicating blond aryan looking youth, lol.) Similar with Madoff. He was always a complete hoax, but he was promoted and the SEC wouldn’t investigate because of what he was. Epstein falls into this pattern. He wanted to be this figure, to have this image, and they made him into this. Similar to the others, he got too big or too dumb and the bubble popped.
but it shows you how easy it is to succeed as a Jew. He got a position at Dalton school, a highly elite private school, without even the requisite credential of a undergraduate math degree! How easy it would be with that sort of promotion or wind behind your sails.
-you say Epstein was nothingburger
-you say Epstein got away with being a pedopimp to the rich famous and powerful due to being a deicider, as do other deicider criminals and deicider societal stringpullers all over the world
Which is it?
I mean, that it was only Larping, sort of like hamburger said. That there was never a real threat of force or blackmail involved in any of this. I mean I’ve only really just now come around to this strain of thought. I objected strongly when Travis Leblanc argued that Epstein was not blackmail operation. I decided this in reading about how Epstein didn’t have a college degree, and he failed ant basically every pursuit endeavored upon. he seemed to have more in common with Stephan glass and Madoff and SBF or people like that that they blow up or whatever. he just doesn’t seem like evil genius material.
If Epstein was a fraud, there’s no reason not to release complete unredacted material on his imaginary empire. But they’re not. So that would indicate he wasn’t just LARPing as an international pimp to the powerful.
Well no sort of client list or anything like that exactly exists. You could release names of people showed up at his places or whatever, but then you’d be releasing private information about people who are not demonstrably involved in criminal activity. I mean, I’m not saying nothing is going on. The whole thing is sordid, that there’s so many high placed people and politicians who would be intimate with somebody involved in this kind of activity, that is under age sex or inappropriate conduct. it doesn’t speak well to the dignity or character of these people at all.
‘Well no sort of client list or anything like that exactly exists.’
How do you know? Do you have some insider information?
Trump embarrassing himself over the Epstein files is a great thing for all critics of Jewish power. It makes it obvious who’s really pulling the strings. The decision to bomb Iran, while unpopular, had the same effect. Yes, these are tremendous errors on the part of Trump, but they are opportunities for us. He has done quite a bit to unintentionally aid our cause.
I agree with Hunter Wallace’s take over at Occidental Dissent:
First, if Trump had lost in 2024 and Kamala Harris had been elected president, she probably wouldn’t have attacked Iran for Israel. Democrats wouldn’t be demanding the release of the Epstein Files. The issue would have gone nowhere and would have been dismissed as a fringe rightwing conspiracy theory. It would have been a footnote. Instead, Trump’s subservience to Israel and his Zionist donors and his decision to dismiss the “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax” has backfired and created enormous public interest in the issue. It is bringing real scrutiny to a topic which otherwise never would have happened.
Second, we knew that Blumpf would probably be back and would be subservient to Israel when we voted for him. We voted for him on the basis of immigration and other issues, not because of what he would do about Jews or Israel. We didn’t expect to prevail on this issue until the 2030s at the earliest because elderly people are too supportive of Israel. Young people on the Left and Right are critical of Israel. Congress is a gerontocracy. The fact that this issue has reached a boiling point now in 2025 with the taboo on the Jewish Question collapsing on the populist Right in spite of Trump is a welcome surprise.
Trump attempted to shut down the discussion of Jeffrey Epstein and impose a litmus test on his base. He failed. That is huge. It shows that his handlers have lost containment.
Good take. Tho i would add that aiding isreal against Iran and Palestine (the latter of which started under PedoJoe and would have still went on under Kabbala), jewy moves as they were, arent as important as the Epstein episode. For after all, those two conflicts are over Mideast sand far away from these shores, and the deiciders’ opponents are a bunch of retarded somewhat less heathen sandniggers (barring exceptions). Which is why the far left is conveniently blaming only the “evil nazi zionists” and distracting from the fact that the problem is the evil deiciders worldwide, not only their evil deicider ziostate. The Epstein coverup meanwhile shows a prime example of a worldwide jew conspiracy and its consequent “shut it down oy vey” moment by ziondon and those in power in the uniparty all across the political spectrum (neither gop nor dems want to release files either). Added to this is the great other moves that ziotrump is doing for the dissidence (perhaps as a distraction from the mishaps so as to keep his numbers up, but still better than nothing), and we get the best of both worlds – some positive action on some fronts, some acceleration towards change in other fronts there is no positive action. Let the fire keep rising, while also not getting burned.
You’re not getting mass deportations, Trump has already confirmed he will be giving green cards to all the illegal farm/hotel/construction workers. Plus you’re getting infinity H-1B Indians to become the new elite. You’ll be lucky to get 1 million leave per year. Alligator alcatraz will be a black site for dissidents in the future once the Dems get in.
He’s also continuing the war in Ukraine and dragging America into a new one against Iran. Plus ramping up crackdowns on anti-Semitism.
But yes, let’s ignore the Epstein files and the Mossad blackmail ring controlling the American Congress.
Terrible take from Quinn here.
Certainly we’re being shown up by others on deportations. Iran reportedly deported 500,000 people in a mere 16 days, and we’ve managed only about 200,000 in six months despite much greater resources and a much larger pool of targets? C’mon, we’re on track to deport maybe 10% of the people that came in during just the prior four years…
Given that Iran has 92 million inhabitants while the US has 340 million, this would correspond to the US deporting 1,850,000 foreigners over a 16 day period.
At that pace, it would theoretically only take 95 days to deport all 11 million illegals.
This highlights how much things hinge on political will and how little on logistical feasability.
I also didn’t like the fact that I had a similar view as Shapiro, that is, this is kinda boring. But then I thought the longer names like Epstein and Weinstein are associated with dirty deeds and remain in the headlines, it could have an impact on the public somehow.
Our supreme duty is to oppose White genocide. Therefore we must not react blindly out of disgust and anger. We must exercise reason and moderation. We must focus on the big picture.
The need to be calm and focus on the big picture should not tempt us to redefine the Epstein conspiracy and President Trump’s betrayal of basic morals so that the situation is not disgusting and not infuriating. We should see things as they are. The situation is disgusting, and it is infuriating, and it is a big deal.
Bribed, corrupted, and blackmailed kiddie-effers cannot have the strength and the spirit needed for self-rule. They will be ruled by others, likely by the suppliers of their vices.
Can you figure out what that implies? The Jews can. They have been playing various forms of this sick game for millennia, and winning it to our great cost.
The situation is not only disgusting and infuriating but it is really important.
We have to stick to our main duty anyway.
I half agree with you. It is disgusting and a big deal, but precisely because we must focus on the big picture, we must be willing to temporarily overlook certain flaws due to our precarious position. In particular, it is better that Republicans maintain a majority in Congress than that Democrats take it and scupper Trump’s last two years. We should be willing to say that “Trump is awful, but we have to make sure the deportations continue and Trump’s good executive orders get encoded into law while we still can, and we have to try to get someone better than Trump elected in 2028.” (Of course, I completely expect the Republicans to drop the ball no matter what else happens.)
I think it’s entirely possible that there really isn’t anything to release because 1) the government didn’t collect the most damning evidence (e.g. I don’t think we took the videos or the computers), and 2) what evidence was collected has had plenty of time to be destroyed or “misplaced”.
Bart: There’s no Epstein client list.
Homer: There’s no Epstein client list anymore.
Also, talk of a “client list” specifically seems silly. I doubt there ever was a list of just the “bad guys”. That was in Epstein’s head, and on the video tapes, not helpfully compiled into a single list on paper. And we may lack the evidence to construct such a list, for the aforementioned reasons.
Of course, Trump is still alienating his followers for no good reason because he’s an extremely flawed character. He could instead say “Look, I’ll be honest with you. We looked and there was nothing left. Maybe the documents were destroyed before we got in. I donno… I know some people won’t believe me. It’s very sad that all those criminals will get away with it. But what else can I say? Very sad…” No need to blast his “PAST supporters” as “weaklings” and “stupid people”.
All indications is Epstein worked for the jews as a handler of jewish assets and facilitator of perversion to create more assets. That’s what’s being hidden. The jews that run Trump don’t want him to think he’s got a say in what he does so they’re forcing him to humiliate himself.
Whatever Epstein was doing, it’s still going on. Somewhere there’s a jew or a jewish asset operating as a panderer of young White flesh.
I agree with Trump that Epstein’s in the past. But Trump wants MAGA etc to then pretend that means the ‘case is closed’. But it’s not. The jews are still running White girls to perverts right now.
I expect you’re right, but there might legitimately be nothing to release, not because Epstein is innocent, but because they destroyed or hid whatever evidence was collected. But yes, the system that produced Epstein is still going strong.
I didn’t say there’s nothing to release. I said that time would be better spent looking at active crimes right now, something which neither the DNC or the GOP seem interested in.
The ‘posterior orientation’ of ‘conservatives’ is one of our enemy’s greatest assets. They can always get ‘conservatives’ to get all lathered up about the past where, quite literally, nothing can ever change.
The Epstein Files are Trump’s equivalent to Clinton’s Waco fiasco.
He’s never going to live this down.
Good. Trump is not enough. We have to ensure he becomes a stepping stone to something greater, rather than our last hurrah.
The way this Epstein thing has unfolded is the greatest thing since sliced bread. If the truth comes out it will show Jewish Power in all its gory details. And if Trump stonewalls then finally MAGA will the difference between Trump and Trumpism, if they have not already. All of this can only be to the good for us.
I wish it were not so, but the only winner here is the mainstream media which is punching up the angle of “Trump is divided from his populist base. Run with it!”
If Q-tards have something actionable, great.
But going after imaginary carnivorous invisible elephants hiding in the basement that might visit us in our sleep, does not get us there.
It is an unfortunate distraction to the JQ and actionable-evidence or arguments that actually could pay off for us politically.
We need to discriminate better and not go for any slop that might happen to stick on the wall.
🙂
I’m kind of torn on this one. Epstein was a bad man and he is dead because of it. I’d say there’s no possible way he killed himself but we won’t know for sure who did. I do think Trump has hurt his relationship with his supporters by flipping on this one. Tell us why you flipped and give us good reasons to believe you. Protecting innocent family members? Whatever reasons you have, give it to us straight so we can move on. And those who have flipped out over this might want to moderate a bit too. Do you need a perp walk for Clinton or a Prince to feel better? I don’t. They have to live with themselves. Let’s focus on deportation and reducing government. Help Trump keep his eye on the prize and his social media fingers in check.
Aside from the good reason thesis and the bad reason thesis there is the stupid reason thesis.
Trump, being a shallow idiot and fake aristocrat who doesn’t read books, probably thought that the Epstein list only implicated a few Republicans. Then he discovered that it implicated large numbers on both sides of the aisle- Epstein isle was highly bipartisan, as bipartisan in fact as Zionism.
And that’s the issue, Trump discovered that it would implicate most of the US government, Hollyweird, big business, Israel, and jews in general. Trump then decided to put jewish interests ahead of American interests and justice and is now hoping he can roll out firmware updates like the Left because he doesn’t understand how politics works.
This makes a lot of sense in the context of July 2025 – with the carnage in Gaza, the 12 day war and the mainstreaming of AIPAC awareness (most notably by Tucker Carlson), the last thing Trump’s “friends” want is public confirmation of Mossad blackmail operations involving minors. Narrative control is at stake.
The Epstein affair gets us about as far now as beating the dead horse on Watergate ─ which is why President Ford was right to end it decisively.
Trump has already agreed to release anything that might be actionable but it is hard to evaluate something that for all intents and purposes is imaginary.
Now if you have additional evidence of more wrongdoing that does need to be addressed, great. But apparently Bondi and Trump don’t think so.
The Leftists and the Democrats of course would not agree ─ no more than they did in 1974.
🙂
Darryl Cooper & Scott Horton provide extensive background information on the Epstein case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XroiqG7lPzM
Main takeaways:
a) Epstein was definitely a money-launderer for very rich people and intelligence agencies
b) Ghislaine Maxwell’s father didn’t earn the nickname “Israel’s superspy” for no reason
c) the Epstein nexus is but one piece of a bigger puzzle. There’s only 1-2 degrees of separation to things like the NXIVM scandal or the Jewish mafia
What I like about Cooper and Horton is that both are very intelligent, well-read and fundamentally fact-based. They strictly separate fact from extrapolation and reject fanciful speculation.
What did he do to earn that title? I love the level of gaslighting and pilpul shapiro and former Israeli PM Bennett are using to deny Epstein was Mossad. What is next with Jewish chutzpah? Your eyes are anti-Semitic for seeing Ehud Barak entering Epstein’s mansion with the collar of his coat untucked to cover his face?
I agree with everything you’ve said but ‘[Trump] doesn’t understand how politics works’.
Trump knows how ‘American politics’ works.
He knows that you’re either a whore for the jews or you’re in their crosshairs or you’re making war on them.
MAGA deserves to die on this hill because Trump doesn’t give a crap about MAGA.
He cares only about his fortune and the jews. Two things that are inextricably mixed.
Btw, “Maga” means “contact” in Hebrew (written: Mem-Gimel-Ayin), hence “Krav Maga” = “contact combat”.
Main translation: “touch ; contact”
Overall: “contact, touch, feel, impact, intercourse, contiguity”
The high-brow meaning would be establishing contact with the hearts of Red State America in a way that no president since Reagan did, but I’m pretty sure it’s also a dirty in-joke for scr*wing over Conservative whites.
This actually vibes very well with Neoconservativism, which was abbreviated as “Neocon” i.e. a new con. Another example of this sort of thing is the think tank “Friends of Europe” whose acronym reads “foe”.
Why make such in-jokes? Because you can (the thrill of making a deception obvious and still getting away with it) and because you believe that the words used to refer to something have inherent power over that thing (which is the Cabalistic mindset).
I honestly think anti-semitic occult conspiracy buffs make jews look more clever than they actually are. The jews have victory over Whites because Whites don’t resist.
This. Might be wrong, I thought this was the fellow who was anti-conspiracy theories. He’s a ‘secret-coder’ ? I’m confused. Jews get what they get because they do stuff and they keep doing it. Their ‘magic’ is they attack and exploit natural junctions and inconsistencies in human nature which they see as weak spots to get ahead. Antisemitism is the nature cure, so they have worked hard to ‘ban’ it.
I don’t know what to offer on the subject of Epstein. I’m for full disclosure at this point.
@Hamburger Today – the reason most ppl have a dislike of “occult conspiracy” stuff is that most of it sounds overly paranoid and highly implausible. But what if you got one or two elites groups in your society for whom Cabalistic number codes are basically part of their religion? Christians will make the sign of the cross and call on Jesus, Cabalists will embed a “33” somewhere as a nod to the Great Architect of the Universe.
@Vagrant Rightist – what’s the point of being pro- or anti-conspiracy theories in general? Some of those theories will be dead wrong, others will be substantially correct. Most conspiracy theories on the internet are BS because the people who came up with them were schizophrenics or ideologically driven and no rational methodology was followed. Doesn’t mean that the truth isn’t out there.
@Dark Plato – Oh yes; “I shouldn’t even get into it” [Alex Jones]
911 ?
If this is true, then who or what has the kind of ruthless, murderous, international power to control US presidents, even one as recalcitrant as Trump? Obviously, it’s Israel along with the upper echelons of the Jewish diaspora.
Great article! I agree, the last time an American president butted heads with these assholes, he was assassinated in Dallas! 🙃
It was a great article, but the JQ has exactly nothing to do with what happened at Dallas in 1963.
JFK was even less our guy than Trump is. And less is still less.
Everything bad about the 1960s was a Libtard germ inside Jack’s little head before it suffered a cowardly assassin’s bullet.
🙂
The author’s “good reason” explanation sounds like a more sophisticated version of “trust the plan” or “he’s playing 5-D chess.” How about the KISS explanation: he’s either covering for himself or he’s covering for Israel. All roads lead to Israel. If we are ever going to deal with the Israel problem, we will actually have to deal with it, not continue to sweep it under the rug or kick it down the road like the author seems to suggest. If Trump’s family is threatened to the point it is affecting his decisions, he needs to be out of office now. If Israel is going to give secrets to China that will hurt us, maybe we should force their hand instead of submitting to blackmail. Maybe the time to deal with our Israel problem is now, rather than in the future when our enemies have had even more time to reduce us to impotence and make us insignificant minorities in our own lands.
At the very least, the Epsten problem should be kept front and center as a lever to hold Trump’s feet to the fire on white issues such as immigration. “Moving past Epstein” is just business as usual as it has been for the past 60+ years. How’s that worked?
We know so little of what’s going on behind the scenes that I cannot share your confidence, Derek. It could very well be that such a shitstorm would come our way if those files were released that it wouldn’t be worth it. That is a possibility we must consider and hardly copium on the level of Q’s trust the plan.
Spencer: how could a shitstorm come our way from releasing the files? Seems like if anyone is clean as a whistle on this it’s us. If the price of proving our main contention (ie, there is a Jewish Cabal) is that Trump goes down or people totally lose faith in our elites then more than so be it—have at it.
I don’t know. But there is a clear difference between my line of reasoning and Q’s. Q would have us look into the unknown and assume the best (Trump 1.0 has it under control). Whereas I look into the unknown and assume the worst (Trump 2.0 will lose control if he unleashes the files).
And since I generally approve of what Trump has been doing thus far and want him to continue doing it, I’d prefer we’d move with great caution when it comes to the Epstein files. In the end I could be wrong about assuming the worst, but I don’t think that I’m wrong for urging a sense of caution.
Spencer: We’re already being gradually ground into extinction by an evil cabal, with the majority of our people lulled into acquiescence by propaganda and temporary comfort. What, pray tell, can Israel do that will be worse than that? China and Russia are run by smart people who do not want an open war with the US., and they are unlikely to be manipulated by Israel into attacking us. Our greatest threat is within. L’Affaire Epstein is an opportunity to lift the veil of secrecy and expose the meddling in our government, winning some number of our people over to our view. That’s the only way we’re going to reverse things.
Derek, thanks for your response. I hope you’re correct. But what if the CIA is just as deep in this as Israel? What if revealing the files would result in high level assassinations and a coup a la October 1917 with the 2 nefarious entities above pulling the strings and BLM and Antifa on the streets? Then what? Hope we’ll win the ensuing Civil War?
My point is that Trump is doing good work and he overlaps with our interests 85-90% of the time, which is far more than any president since before the depression. The best thing we can do is let him continue doing his job and maintain his popularity so that when JD Vance gets reelected in 2032 California secedes, followed by Oregon, Washington, New England, and other lefty enclaves. Red state secession in other words. Then we’ll have a shot at our ethnostate, without a Civil War.
Shitting on Trump over these mysterious Epstein files is one way to jeopardize this possibility.
Spencer: I voted for Trump and I would possibly hold my nose and vote for him again. But I think your 85-90 percent estimate is a bit high. Yes, it’s great that he shut the border. But the deportations are going slow (despite all the media uproar), he has not used his power to push E-Verify, and the flood of bogus visa holders continues.
I love DOGE and the way NPR got cut. But instead of using it to cut back on the debt (another form of enslavement), he is increasing it. On foreign policy, he’s been a nightmare. Remember how he was going to end the Ukraine war on day 1? It was so easy to do, but he has bungled it badly. He’s been even more Israel-first than expected. And the rest of the world is running to join BRICS and ending the dollar’s run as the world currency because the US seems so unhinged.
I have no better hopes for Vance, who is a Peter Thiel puppet with a Pajeet wife. There’s a good chance he will lead us down the merry path to the point at which Palantir tells us when to crap and when to hold it in.
And yes, the CIA is definitely involved and has been joined at the hip with Israel since the 1950s when James Jesus Angleton was its main driver. We are not in a good place. The sad truth is that our approved politicians will not get us out of this situation. The only thing we can do is continue to “disinfect with sunlight” to win more of our own people to our cause. By exposing various truths, we have shifted the Overton Window in the last decade or so–and that is the way forward. Anything else is kicking the can down the road to a time when we are even weaker.
Derek, I think this has more to do with driving the Left up the wall than anything positive Trump and Vance can do. I suspect Trump derangement syndrome won’t survive another 8 years of America First, imperfect as it is. Trumpism is our last chance, despite the flaws of the people who carry its banner. The Epstein files could potentially bring down Trumpism. That is what scares me.
Well, Spencer, there was something like Trumpism long before Trump came down the escalator in 2015. I’m a geezer (I prefer that to “boomer”); in my life I remember Nixon’s Silent Majority, the Reagan Democrats, Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, and the TEA Party. And there will be something like Trumpism after Trump; as one person I know put it, Trump merely saw a big parade, jumped in front of it, and became the leader. Given that we now have much better information sources, that America First helped redefine the right, and that much of the white rights movement’s foundation has already been built, it is likely the next version will be even better.
I’m seeing signs that our numbers are growing, and the quality of people is growing as well. When I was young, the visible racial right had a few intellectual oddballs and some unsophisticated guys with negative images. Recently, I saw a picture of the national leaders from the Identitarian Conference in Milan. They were all fit, handsome, well-dressed, sophisticated, and intelligent. Some of them had already suffered in their own lives for their beliefs. From such young men powerful movements are built. I’m too old to see what will eventually happen, but I would not count our people out. With or without Trump.
Musk is an immature adult pretending to be autistic, so I would give Trump a pass. But the Epstein thing looks very suspect, already.
If there’s nothing in the files, then there’s no harm in releasing them. If there is something in the files that mentions specific names and the material is merely embarrassing, one thinks such folks could hire PR managers and deal with it. There’s no reason to sit on them. Trump is just being treated like every other jew pawn in history: He’s having his nose rubbed in his own shit in order to prove it can be done.
And Trump isn’t doing anything for White people that White people wouldn’t have done for themselves if the Federal authority didn’t engage in open violence very time he did.
Trump isn’t there to help White people not even as a side-effect. Trump’s job is to make it look like there’s improvement when there isn’t one. If you’ve be sliced by a big butcher knife, a single stitch isn’t going to staunch the bleeding. That’s what Trump and his policies amounts to: A single stitch on a gusher.
Trump is not ‘our guy’ and he’s not a ‘solution’ or even a part of a ‘solution’ for White Nationalists.
Everything he does is for the jews and darkies.
No, he’s not our guy. But it could be a lot worse. I don’t see anybody else on the track.
🙂
You don’t see anybody else ‘on track’? If the only choice on the menu was rotten chicken guts, would that make it an acceptable dining choice? The fact that we have no choices is a tribute the fact that ‘white power’ activism has been counter-productive for 70+ years.
George Lincoln Rockwell made exactly that same point, over sixty years ago when the choice was LBJ or AuH2O. It was like dining at the garbage dump.
Trump is not one of our guys and I get tired of restating the obvious.
But some progress is probably better than no progress or negative progress ─ although I could be wrong. That is why I am here, as one basically cannot discuss and debate such things anywhere else.
Some people think that nothing can possibly change without a global thermonuclear war and radioactive mutant zombies roaming the lands ─ or some sort of eschatological equivalent. Then we can have an ethnostate or whatever kind of society we want, I guess.
I don’t think that’s true, but I might be lacking in imagination.
🙂
Fine, defend Trump if you think there’s anything for us in it. But, I’m through. He at least suggested that he was going to end the forever wars. Within six months of inauguration, he’s bombing Iran for Israel. Now he’s taking up “Biden’s war” in Ukraine for Lindsey Graham and the Neocons. He said that he was going to release the information on Epstein, and, more generally, expose the intelligence state. A visit from Netanyahu, and all of a sudden there’s nothing to release, and anyone who says that there is is a loser. Eff Donald Trump and eff the horse that he rode in on. No, scratch that. Don’t eff the horse. It’s guilty of nothing. Just eff Donald Trump. He’s not our guy.
… the shadowy, super rich figures who most likely used Epstein to trap and compromise world leaders and influential people in order to control them—a global mafia with the ability to assassinate people in prison while making it look like suicide. Yes, it would be great if we would bring such people to justice. But what if such people control the justice system? Then what?…
—
But, but, but, despite the facts, Scott says Epstein is a nothingburger, so there you have it. Case closed! We’ll see. It could well be Trump’s undoing. Then what?
Spencer, you know, and I sure know that (((such people))) control the justice system, Congress, the media and so much more in this country, and in what’s left of the White world — including Donald Trump and his crew of Zionists.
I’m encouraged by the comments under your article. The jig is nearly up for organized Jewry if this attitude by long-suffering goyim reaches critical mass. Trump’s military support of Jewry’s bombing the shit out of Iran and Gaza has a growing list of at least 30 nations protesting, at least for what he’s been doing against Palestinians.
Hague Group announces plans to hold Israel
accountable for Gaza genocide in Bogota summit
Thursday, 17 July 2025
The Hague Group has announced steps to hold the Israeli regime accountable for the genocidal war against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip that has been going on for over 21 months.
Led by South Africa and Colombia, delegates from some 30 countries and UN officials such as the rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, gathered in the Colombian capital to take part in a summit on July 15 and 16.
The Hague Group announced plans on Wednesday to exert pressure against “Israel’s violations of international law” in a war that has already claimed nearly 58,600 lives.
Among the measures announced in the six-step plan by the group are the denial of arms shipments to Israel, and a review of public contracts for possible links to companies reaping profit from the Israeli war on Gaza.
“Palestine has changed global consciousness, drawing a clear line between those who oppose genocide and those who accept it or are part of it,” she added.
The Hague Group, made up of twelve countries, including South Africa, Colombia, Bolivia, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, was formed in January in the Dutch city to bring together countries from the “Global South.”
Source: Hague Group announces plans to hold Israel accountable for Gaza genocide in Bogota summit http://www.presstv.co.uk
It’s the UN and these aren’t White nations, but the more that join against the US/Jewry Alliance, the better.
I don’t care about Trump. In a few years he will be irrelevant anyway.
However, the Left undoing Trump means that they have undone everything that got him elected twice.
That means: illegal immigration, ending birthright citizenship, braking hard on globalization, threatening protective tariffs, etc. These once-taboo ideas are now popular with Trump supporters and you could see it at every one of his political rallies.
Not long ago the elites were touting how much Mandarin they had learned. That is not the case any longer.
No, Trump is not “our guy” and not even close.
But Trump is the only one whose head bobs above the horizon silhouette, and the mainstream media knows it.
Like the YoYos who shot Pat Tilman in an act of friendly fire, the Q-tards need to stop a minute and realize that it is already dusk in Afghanistan and that they are no longer literally walking point (there could be friendlies farther ahead). Posthumously promoting Tilman laterally from Spec-4 to Corporal does not change the facts on the ground.
Epstein is dead in an almost-certain suicide. Ghislaine is in prison and will be there until she is at least in her late 70s.
If anybody has any more actionable evidence, that is great.
Otherwise, this does not address the JQ. Not even close.
It also assists deflecting and discrediting what the Establishment really does fear about MAGA, which is why the mainstream media is running with it ─ and they are hardly letting anything on X set or mitigate their anti-White agenda.
🙂
The PR cost of doing this is massive, so if there was nothing damaging in the files, the obvious play would have been to release them. For the sake of your argument let’s say there are no files at all. In that case, Trump and his team created this crisis by repeatedly hyping up non-existent files. He repeatedly discussed them on social media and the campaign trail. His attorney general said the files were sitting on her desk. So even if we say there’s nothing to see here, he still cynically manipulated this story and idiotically created a completely self-inflicted communications crisis.
So the question this scandal raises is do you prefer to think of Trump as immoral or retarded? I think immoral would be the better outcome, because maybe then he could still get some things done. If he’s just retarded, as he would have to be in the scenario you’re suggesting, I think it’s pretty hopeless.
Recently the AG confidently said she had files on her desk and that they were going through them.
Well, presumably that has been done ─ and like the “unreleased JFK files” it’s a nothing-burger. I’m sure there is major dissapointment but the best policy is to get ahead of the tempest in the teapot.
If I were to fault them, maybe they should have been more cautious in playing up to their “Q-tard base.”
I disagree that the PR cost to Trump has been “massive,” and it seems to be winding down already.
I think they can also be faulted perhaps for not fully appreciating how much they would disappoint the conspiracy theorists ─ but this is not really Trump’s base, regardless of what the Leftist corporate media says.
To the Establishment elites, it is absolutely intolerable that salt-of-the-Earth White people really do like Trump.
I’ve seen quite a few of the rallies that Trump has held, and the kinds of White people who come out to them from 2016 to 2024. Most of these people do not wear tin foil hats to Faraday Cage their lizard brains.
The Libtard media elites writing articles in the Atlantic and elsewhere have been uncomfortable with politically-active “reactionary” White people for as long as I can remember. They seem mostly to be troubled that Darkies almost never go to Trump rallies (or at least not the ones that I have been to in the Phoenix area).
What I can guarantee, however, is the given that the Democrats and the anti-Trump coterie, who despise MAGA and whatever it does, or that they think it does, stand for ─ and who particularly loath some of the things that elected Trump twice, like criticism of open borders and immigration ─ will seize ANY excuse to beat a dead horse.
For Trump’s many faults, one of them is not that the mass-media viscerally and fundamentally hate him.
It was the same after Nixon’s resignation over Watergate in 1974. The Democrats did not want to let it go because it was just too good to be true. They even blamed Nixon for the Vietnam War itself, which is truly blinking at reality.
If AG Bondi had released a bunch of Epstein crap for “full disclosure,” the usual suspects would still be blaming Trump and calling it a coverup, and doing the same flogging of ripe horseflesh.
The AG is now calling to release the Epstein Grand Jury information, which is almost unprecedented. If approved, and that might be interesting to say the least, it will have to be redacted to “protect the innocent” as Sergeant Joe Friday used to say in a TV show from the 1960s. So the Q-tards will still be big butthurt.
If this matter prunes some of Trump’s MAGA deadwood before the 2026 midterms, so much the better. Regardless, nothing is going to ever put a second shooter on the scene in Dallas.
So will the Democraps be able to continue their perfunctory Trump flogging? I don’t know; they will always try.
But the real story is not Jews like Epstein and Ghislaine that got caught, but the claim of the media elite that there is serious dissention in Trump’s base, and I think that is overstated. Yeah, they wish.
It should not be underestimated that before Trump it was impossible to even seriously mention in the mainstream things like Birthright Citizenship and H-1B visas. Yeah, this is not Deutschland Erwacht! but it is not nothing either.
🙂
Scott: July 19, 2025 I don’t care about Trump. In a few years he will be irrelevant anyway.
—
Interesting response that can apply to everybody about everything
—
Trump is the only one whose head bobs above the horizon silhouette, and the mainstream media knows it... It also assists deflecting and discrediting what the Establishment really does fear about MAGA, which is why the mainstream media is running with it.
—
You do know that the word media is plural for medium, right? I’ve noticed lots of professional media “journalists” apparently never learned that. “Mainstream media is this, mainstream media is that,” they say, but never “mainstream media are controlled by Jews.”
Yeah, I do prefer saying that the media is rather than the media are because they act more like a Kosher corporate collective rather than a bunch of scrappy reporters who are each plying their intrepid trade as lone ciphers, always hungry for something besides Spin.
I suppose, for example, that it is more grammatically correct when describing a music band like the Beatles or Iron Maiden as the Band are rather than the Band is, but that has always sounded awkward to me becauses a musical group is a collectve by definition. (Not that I read a lot of Rolling Stone, nor do I pay a lot of attention to Gonzo writing styles.)
It is on the level of saying that the Data show rather than the Data shows. Since the Latin etymology of data is the plural form of datum (a fact given), the former is actually correct. But I don’t really like it since data is/are grouped, and language does evolve (or at least it did so before the Internet and AI came along).
AI is starting to make YouTube content unwatchable in my opinion because the “narrators” are starting to sound like affectatious hipsters (or what AI thinks that youthful affectatious hipsters would sound like). Fingernails scratching the chalkboard. So you start hearing endless atrocities like Great Briddon in narrations now, rather than Great Britain, as an adult White man would probably say it.
Anyway, if Mr. Goad were around for grammatical advice, we could ask him how he prefers to handle such things like We Wuz Kangs once, and young.
🙂
Scott: July 19, 2025 Yeah, I do prefer saying that the media is rather than the media are because they act more like a Kosher corporate collective rather than a bunch of scrappy reporters who are each plying their intrepid trade as lone ciphers, always hungry for something besides Spin.
—
To each his own, but to a grammarian the terms “media” and “medium” have distinct meanings:
Media: Refers to multiple communication outlets or channels, such as television, radio, newspapers, and the internet.
Medium: Can mean a single communication method or channel
In summary, media is the plural form encompassing various channels, while medium is the singular form that can refer to one specific channel or method.
—
AI is starting to make YouTube content unwatchable in my opinion because the “narrators” are starting to sound like affectatious hipsters (or what AI thinks that youthful affectatious hipsters would sound like)…
—
I suppose Jew-owned YouTube has value as a near monopoly video channel. I haven’t looked on YT for years on principle, since those Jews would ban National Alliance material. Occasionaly a trusted friend tells me I should watch something there, but as a rule, I ignore social media altogether, unless C-C is considered a social medium.
I leave AI to our National Alliance Media Director, Kevin Strom, who is a trained broadcast engineer like you, Scott, and very adept at using AI and all grades of electronic contrivances about which I do not give a whit. But let’s get back on the subject you say is a nothingburger.
On today’s weekly American Dissident Voices broadcast of 19 July, Kevin features “Epstein and Jewish Power Redux, part 2” available at nationalvanguard.org. In this second part, that should be read in full, is this from Kevin’s coverage of the Epstein’s rape ring of young White girls TEN AND 1/2 YEARS AGO — no nothingburger, to say the least:
[Jeffrey Epstein’s] “little black book” reads like a Who’s Who of elite Jews and their Gentile figureheads, along with a list of dozens upon dozens of girls, listed by their first names and telephone numbers only, who were available to provide “massage services” for Epstein and his wealthy friends in the Virgin Islands, in Paris, in New Mexico, in Florida, in New York City, and other locations. A couple of months ago, just before the Epstein case exploded in the headlines again, Rodriguez died. He was 60 years old.
Not including the much-discussed Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, here are just a few of the well-known names in Epstein’s contact book:
Dr. Elie Wiesel, professional Jewish “holocaust survivor”; the late Senator Ted Kennedy, author of so much anti-White immigration and other legislation; the Jewish “advisor” to — and handler of — Presidents since the 1960s, Henry Kissinger; the Jewish senior Clinton adviser Ira Magaziner; Fox News founder and hyper-Zionist Rupert Murdoch; Wall Street vulture and Jewish billionaire Ronald Perelman; Jewish comedienne Joan Rivers; ultra-wealthy Jewish bankers Edouard de Rothschild and Evelyn de Rothschild; the late Jewish banker Edmond Safra; Saudi Prince Solman; the late Jewish actor, director, producer, and neocon Ron Silver; the son of uber-oligarch George Soros, the wealthy Jew Peter Soros — whose name was circled, and Epstein had no fewer than ten contact numbers for him; the Black governor of the US Virgin Islands, Charles Turnbull; two different governors of New Mexico, where Epstein owned a huge estate, Bruce King and Bill Richardson; convicted Jewish insider-trader Sam Waksal; the late Jewish TV journalist Mike Wallace; Jewish TV personality Barbara Walters; Jewish Hollywood mogul Bob Weinstein; Jewish media “sex expert” Dr. Ruth Westheimer; Israeli leader Ehud Barak (whose name was circled; and for whom eight contact numbers were listed); hyper-aggressive Zionist lawyer Alan Dershowitz (whose name was also circled, and for whom 15 contact numbers were given); Jewish media mogul and former head of Disney Michael Ovitz; David Rockefeller; Donald Trump (whose name was circled and for whom 17 methods of contact were listed); Jewish businessman Les Wexner (whose name was circled and for whom an impressive 71 ways of contact were given); Jewish publisher Mortimer Zuckerman, whom Epstein could contact in any one of 21 different ways; and many, many more. You can read them at nationalvanguard.org…
While you learn more about Epstein, today and in the coming days and months, remember who it is who has told you the truth about this horrific abuse of our girls and woman, and of our nation and people, who has told you the truth from the very beginning: the National Alliance.
This seems to me like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to burn into the brains of every white under the age of 50 the truth about who rules them and how that rule is maintained. So I say maximum pressure to achieve as full a disclosure as possible, followed by the full prosecutions of every boomer rapist that can be identified.
If not now, when? And how? And by whom? Every single thing Trump has done can be undone by a successor. And there is still plenty of time for him to be bluffed or bullied into further stupidity (a real war with Iran, for example).
If it can be even partially demonstrated that Jews blackmailed American citizens with the knowledge and cooperation of the security and judicial apparatus, it will flush the boomer truth regime down the toilet forever and take a lot of superannuated dead-end losers in the pro-white camp with it.
OK Zoomer.
🙂
Always be on the lookout for this JEWISH TALKING POINT. It can appear in many variants but invariably takes this general direction: “Epstein wasn’t a pedophile, as he only had sex with girls who were barely under-aged and legal in many places in the world.”
All cheekiness aside, Will, I am not defending Epstein or Ghislaine.
One killed himself and the other got a twenty years prison sentence.
I am not sure what more should be (and can be) done to serve the course of justice.
Aside from some Zoomers who are perennially butthurt about “Boomers,” I have not heard too many ideas.
It seems like more 911 Truther B.S. and a big distraction from real issues like Immigration and Birthright Citizenship.
If they do release the Grand Jury transcripts on Epstein, as the Administration has now called for, that might be interesting, but it might also milk the matter further ─ which is something Trump probably wants to avoid but that the Democrats dearly want.
And by my way of thinking, they are far more hostile to White people than the Kosher Convservatives and the moronic GOP budget hawks. The Democrats still try to define themselves by Freedom Riders and Watergate even to this day, and they are idiots.
So bottom line. I think the Trumpers made the right call, but I have no insider access to the “Epstein information” such that there is, and I am in the dark as much as anyone else.
How can we improve the course of justice here?
🙂
Scott: July 20, 2025 All cheekiness aside, Will, I am not defending Epstein or Ghislaine.
I am not sure what more should be (and can be) done to serve the course of justice….
How can we improve the course of justice here?
—
You’re asking me? I’ll try to put aside cheekiness.
You say, “we,” but we have no authority or power to change the Judaized status quo by fucking around anonymously on Faceberg, Instagram, Telegram, etc., or even X that we do not control. We need an entirely new consciousness and new order.
I saw that one of the guiltiest Jew liars in the Epstein controversy, Alan Dershowitz, was to appear this morning on one of the Jew-controlled Sunday TV news shows to deny, deny, deny, while quoting Constitutional law. Is that how “we” get to the truth of the matter about his old friend and client Epstein –by his claiming Attorney/Client privilege, (confidentiality) to protect his long dead kinsman? Seriously?
Dershy wrote his defense of Epstein associations, claiming in the NY Times best-selling book six years ago, claiming he is entirely innocent of the sexual misconduct accusations against him, while suggesting a roadmap for how such allegations should be handled in a just society: “Guilt by Accusation: The Challenge of Proving Innocence in the Age of #MeToo”
“Just society,” he says. Ha! Note these reviews of Dershy and his book on Amazon:
“The truth has no greater defender than Alan Dershowitz.”—Benjamin Netanyahu
“The fearless, peerless Alan Dershowitz.”—Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi, Great Britain
“Alan Dershowitz speaks with great passion and personal courage.”—Eli Wiesel
“There are great legal minds; there are those who can also communicate well on television; then there is Dershowitz. The professor is uniquely capable of arguing a position, while putting a premium on legal and ethical legitimacy, not its popularity. Bravo, Dershowitz!”—Chris Cuomo, Anchor And Reporter, CNN
It’s going to take aan uncompronising racial statesman — not a politician, nor an academician, nor controlled media spokesmen, nor some dipshit rabbi with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews — certainly not a corrupted court of law. It will take a team or inquisators, headed by a no nonsense Grand Inquisitor like Torquemada who puts race preservation (not the Catholic Church) ahead of all else,
WWHD to get to the bottom of things? I’m guessing he’d first remove Jews from media control, and close other checks to truth like unsealing past incriminating investigations and grand jury secrets, sealed to protect the guilty — then force identifiable guilty anti-White weasels who hide behind a big loophole to finding the truth: invoking the “Constitutionally protected” Fifth Amendment, “on advice of counsel.”
Crooked anti-White counselors should be the first to be threatened with whatever it takes to get them on the right side of history. How about Nuremberg-like show trials ending with defendants going to either re-education work camps or the gallows? A precedent was set for this 80 years ago.
In other words, forget mass democracy and the current failed system of electoral politics, and think revolution beginning with racial separation — eligible Whites withdrawing our consent to be governed by the thoroughly Judaized System.
I laughed out loud when you quoted those top Space Lizards singing the praises of Dershy. And Elie the Weasel is in Epstein’s black book! What an upstanding guy – he almost makes Martin Luther King seem like a preacher!
Beau Albrecht: July 20, 2025 I laughed out loud when you quoted those top Space Lizards singing the praises of Dershy. And Elie the Weasel is in Epstein’s black book! What an upstanding guy – he almost makes Martin Luther King seem like a preacher!
—
It would be laugh-out-loud hilarious, Beau, if it wasn’t such a serious matter. Read the rest of that about Epstein’s little black book and about the lying Shylock, Dershy, here: “Epstein and Jewish Power Redux, part 2” at nationalvanguard.org
…One of Epstein’s friends told New York magazine writer Philip Weiss that “[Epstein] thinks there’s an anti-Semitic conspiracy against him….” Epstein’s fellow Jew, close friend, and, according to at least one witness, co-participant in sexual abuse, Alan Dershowitz — also sees it that way. And so do Dershowitz’s supporters. One commenter at the Jewish Daily Forward, Rabbi Bernhard Rosenberg, puts it bluntly: “Alan Dershowitz is a scholar who has fought for Jews and Israel and for preserving the memory of the Holocaust. There is no truth to the accusations against him… I have never claimed to be G-d’s voice… but I know the anti-SEMITES and Anti-Zionists are enjoying this accusation, which will be proven in a court of law to be false. We Jews should speak up for one who defends Israel and the Jewish people.”
Dershowitz has claimed on television that he will seek the disbarment of the attorneys working for the victims in this case, and that he never saw anything improper, never met or saw any underage women at Jeffrey Epstein’s estates or on his airplanes, and that he only visited Epstein while in the constant company of his wife. But just yesterday, the passenger manifests of Epstein’s aircraft were released, and they show Dershowitz as a passenger on several occasions, without being accompanied by his wife, and on the same flights in which several female passengers were, curiously, listed only by their first names — “Hazel,” “Claire,” “Tatianna,” and others…
This sounds about right. It’s difficult not to notice the very public, pivotal presence Dershowitz is on this, first as the preferred in house Mr fixit representing Epstein in that ridiculous deal he got, then trying to shape public opinion in a certain direction all time, looking for a particular outcome, even against the difficult picture of his own entanglement with Epstein. It’s like there’s no pause for thought. He’s now calling for Maxwell to be free.
Whoever Dershowitz advocates for, expect it’s the guilty. Whatever he dismisses, is where he doesn’t want it to go.
It’s also difficult not to notice the heavy Jewish networking at all stages.
Oh, I’ve never had any illusions about the guy. I’m not surprised by this latest development, except for one thing. That would be his uncharacteristically clumsy efforts to lie his way out of it; one would expect better from a lifelong highly-paid professional. Anyway, to call him a sick rat bastard would be an insult to convalescent rodents without a father.
What makes me crack up, though, are all the big-name professional yiddlers who vouch for that character like he’s some kind of saint. Do they have any idea how stupid it makes them look?
Crooked anti-White counselors should be the first to be threatened with whatever it takes to get them on the right side of history. How about Nuremberg-like show trials ending with defendants going to either re-education work camps or the gallows? A precedent was set for this 80 years ago. I suggest a Unit 731 2.0 and an Inquisition Legion crueler than Vlad the Impaler in his worst moods, and a ruthless proWhite cheka to deal with these monsters that lurk among us. As our people and the animal kingdom has suffered for millennia because of their devilry, true equality returned is more than appropriate.
You make good points, Will. I too wish that we could pass Go and start sending subversies directly to their just desserts.
🙂
Derek Stark: “Well, Spencer, there was something like Trumpism long before Trump came down the escalator in 2015.”
Good points all, Derek. Indeed, Trumpism is just straight up Buchananism (no wars, tariffs, stop immigration). Indeed, when he heard Trump’s speech on June 16 2015 Buchanan said he nearly fell out of his chair. And let’s not forget Duke as well from the early 1990s along with Buchanan and Perot.
But Buchanan or Duke never tweaked or Trolled the Left like Trump does. That is a crucial component of trumpism, and one that drives our enemies mad. That might make a difference in the end.
Buchanan was pretty good at driving the left to distraction, his 1992 Convention speech caused Molly Ivins to say it was better in the original German. At bottom though I think that if our supposition is correct, that Israel has blackmailed a big swath of the elites, and we can get a majority of Americans to know that, anything that is a result of that, even Trump’s fall, it will be worth it. Whatever else Spencer, your article is very thought provoking and spurred a lively conversation, the commentariat has been out in force!
Yes it has, and I am very grateful for it. Thank you, Douglas!