884 words
Eugenics, the science of improving human genetics through selective breeding and genetic technologies, has been unfairly maligned due to its historical associations with racism and coercion.
However, modern eugenics—rooted in voluntary genetic screening, embryo selection, and gene editing—offers a path toward healthier, smarter, and more prosperous populations. Despite this, white liberals have dominated the discourse, framing eugenics as inherently oppressive while ignoring its potential benefits for marginalized groups, particularly black communities.
Contrary to liberal assumptions, many black individuals recognize the role of genetics in racial disparities and support using biotechnology to uplift their communities. They understand that intelligence, health, and physical prowess are heritable traits that can be enhanced through scientific intervention. Yet, philanthropic organizations and policymakers, influenced by left-wing taboos, refuse to fund genetic programs that could reduce suffering in black populations. Instead, they pour billions into ineffective foreign aid for Africa, exacerbating overpopulation and migration crises.
This article argues that voluntary eugenics should be subsidized for those who need it most—particularly black Americans and Africans—to close genetic gaps. It also critiques Western media outlets like The Guardian and New Statesman for smearing eugenics, thereby denying minorities the tools to overcome their biological disadvantages.
Many assume that black communities uniformly reject eugenics due to its association with white supremacist policies. However, in private conversations, numerous black intellectuals and working-class individuals have expressed interest in genetic technologies that could improve IQ, reduce disease susceptibility, and enhance physical traits. One black college student I spoke with said: “If we could use CRISPR to make black kids smarter and healthier, why wouldn’t we? We already know there are genetic differences between races—why pretend otherwise? If white liberals really cared about racial equality, they’d support genetic upgrades for black people instead of just giving us welfare and affirmative action.”
Another black entrepreneur remarked: “The elite already use IVF and genetic screening to have better children. Why shouldn’t poor blacks have the same opportunities? If philanthropists really want to help, they should give vouchers for genetic services instead of just food vouchers.”
These perspectives reveal a pragmatic approach to biotechnology—one that prioritizes results over ideological purity. Unfortunately, white liberal gatekeepers in media and academia suppress such discussions, fearing that acknowledging genetic differences will fuel racism. In reality, denying biological realities prevents meaningful solutions.
Black Americans, on average, suffer from higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, and sickle cell anemia—conditions with strong genetic components. They also score lower on IQ tests, a gap that persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. While environmental factors play a role, ignoring genetics ensures that disparities remain unresolved.
Hence philanthropic organizations should subsidize:
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) – Allowing parents to select embryos with higher IQ potential and fewer disease risks.
- CRISPR Gene Editing – Correcting genetic mutations linked to low intelligence and poor health.
- Fertility Incentives for High-IQ blacks – Encouraging educated, healthy blacks to have more children. For example, scientific foundations could give more grant funding to applicants who have children.
Voucher programs could make these technologies accessible to low-income families, reducing inequality at the biological level. Instead of pouring money into failed social programs, philanthropists should invest in genetic upgrades that yield permanent improvements.
Africa’s Genetic Crisis and the Failure of Foreign Aid
Africa remains the world’s poorest continent, with soaring birth rates and stagnant development. Traditional foreign aid—focusing on food, healthcare, and infrastructure—has only worsened the problem by increasing fertility rates without corresponding economic opportunities. The result? Mass migration to Europe and America, straining Western societies.
If Western governments and charities truly want to help Africa, they should:
- Fund Genetic Research – Identifying and editing genes linked to low intelligence and disease susceptibility.
- Promote Contraception and Selective Breeding – Encouraging higher-IQ Africans to have more children while reducing dysgenic fertility trends. Instead of sponsoring businesses for women or minorities in developing countries, international organizations could create grant programmes for STEM entrepreneurs with children.
- Replace Aid with Biotechnology Grants – Shifting funding from food handouts to genetic enhancement programs.
Investing in sanitation and healthcare alone is counterproductive because it allows low-IQ, high-fertility populations to grow uncontrollably. A smarter approach would combine humanitarian aid with eugenic incentives, ensuring Africa produces a more capable workforce rather than an endless stream of unskilled migrants.
Publications like The Guardian and New Statesman routinely attack eugenics, equating it with Nazi atrocities. Yet their moral posturing ignores key facts:
- Modern eugenics is voluntary, not coercive.
- People already practice “soft eugenics” by choosing intelligent, attractive partners.
- Opposing genetic enhancement condemns minorities to preventable suffering.
By demonizing eugenics, left-wing media denies black communities the chance to overcome genetic disadvantages. If CRISPR could eliminate sickle cell anemia or boost cognitive potential, why should ideological dogmatism stand in the way?
The outdated notion that eugenics is inherently racist must be discarded. In reality, the most racist policy is denying black people access to genetic improvements that could elevate their potential. Therefore, philanthropists should subsidize genetic services for those who need them most, and African aid should prioritize biological enhancement over unsustainable population growth. White liberals, in their zeal to appear anti-racist, have become the biggest obstacle to black progress. It’s time to reject their paternalism and embrace a future where biotechnology liberates all races from the constraints of bad genetics. Voluntary eugenics is not oppression—it is empowerment.
8 comments
It’s not a bad long term aim, especially if blacks fund this themselves, but so long as the US is controlled by Israel I don’t believe eugenics will be practiced.
I don’t have a problem with humans using traditional means or advanced scientific means of practicing healthy, ethical eugenics. Mate selection, done with intelligence, is eugenics.
I do have a problem with giving more subsidies to blacks. We’ve been bled dry. Jared Taylor, years ago, argued correctly that welfare paid for by whites and given to blacks is in effect mass cuckholdry. That is undeniably true. The entirety of American White society was forced to give resources to black families – which is the essence of cuckholdry – forcing other men to expend their resources raising genetic heirs that are not his. Seen this way as it is proper to do so is to see that this is an outrage – a genetic crime against an entire people.
I would much prefer that White Nationalists argue, that Whites, ethnic Europeans, keep our resources to ourselves and use them to improve ourselves. Of course, if blacks in America can increase their resources they can invest them in better genetics. Given 75+ years of Whites being plundered to help blacks, in a program of mass cuckholdry is the last thing any White advocate should argue. Let’s improve our own genetic stock. Let’s also remember that taking criminals out of the gene pool through harsh punishment has likely been a reason why we commit far less crime than blacks.
I for one, am done with looking out for everyone else but me and my kind. Eugenics for me and mine and ours using our resources. What a tragedy if Bill Gates handing his entire fortune to Africa was used to make blacks genetically superior to our posterity because the resources Gates acquired on the backs of our high-trust, low crime, high work ethic and high IQ society of ethnic Europeans was handed to Africa. No more. Enough is enough.
Re: “Let’s also remember that taking criminals out of the gene pool through harsh punishment has likely been a reason why we commit far less crime than blacks.”
AM, I couldn’t agree more. I can’t be described as a “pro-lifer” because although I’m anti-abortion, I am very pro death penalty. Not only does it make society safer by stopping violent criminal genetics from continuing to propagate in an unfettered fashion, it’s also the only effective crime deterrent for many super violent criminal predators. Interestingly, years back, I saw where serial murders on death row, were committing suicide. (How does this make sense? Death penalty sentences are just that distressing to the conscience.)
In less Westernized countries, punishments for crimes like theft are particularly severe. What Americans might consider to be totally unwarranted/unconscionable, is what is required to keep order among groups of people whose men are much more ruthless.
You are devilishly sarcastic! Why don’t we just give blacks “Carte Blanche” in all western countries; why don’t we set blacks on a pedestal wherever they roam; why don’t we let them kill white children, and rape white women, whenever they want to—without repercussions! Wait we already do that! 🙃
CRISPR gene editing is a very, very dangerous path to go down. A species can rely on natural selection for a trillion years and they’ll always know that they’re adapting to their environment. But outsource your genetic code to an AI/government/corporation for a few generations and your descendants might be a disaster.
Mass gene editing would be very costly. Practically speaking, this calls for a cultural solution. The basic problem is that those who are the least able to support children and raise them properly are having the most children. (It’s a problem noted in the White community too, even a century ago by figures like Madison Grant. Society has gone pretty far downhill since then!) I’ve seen some Black spaces in the Manosphere discussing how young women usually overlook any guy who has his act together and gravitate towards those with the worst prospects.
“denying minorities the tools to overcome their biological disadvantages.”
Natural African genetics is what’s best for Africans in Africa. They have lots of kids in their homelands, because several will die young. This is their innate natural survival strategy. (For those of European lineage, their long-term survival strategy has been to have far fewer kids, and to invest more time, attention, and instruction into rearing each one.) I don’t know this for a fact, but it would not surprise me if Europeans naturally had poorer eyesight, & were more dependent on eyeglasses than Africans. In Africa, nearsidedness could prove fatal due to hungry lions on the prowl.
“We already know there are genetic differences between races—why pretend otherwise? If white liberals really cared about racial equality, they’d support genetic upgrades for black people instead of just giving us welfare and affirmative action.”
It’s a complete joke to believe that the wealthy, control-freak, highly Israel-first tribal, ”’White liberals”’ care about anyone besides themselves, and using AI to help them manage large populations for worldwide totalitarianism under their leadership.
“Unfortunately, white liberal gatekeepers in media and academia suppress such discussions, fearing that acknowledging genetic differences will fuel racism.”
acknowledging genetic differences ̶w̶i̶l̶l̶ ̶f̶u̶e̶l̶ ̶r̶a̶c̶i̶s̶m̶.̶ will awaken White racial consciousness, which will eventually sound deep alarms to those willing to fight to the death to put an end to the totalitarian takeover of White Western countries.
“[Blacks] also score lower on IQ tests, a gap that persists even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. While environmental factors play a role, ignoring genetics ensures that disparities remain unresolved.”
So, ‘low-IQ’ is something you say you’d really, earnestly, like to fix. This is most likely because you’ve been formally indoctrinated to always compare African-Americans to White Americans, and not shoot for the highest average IQ, of say, far East Asians.
“Fertility Incentives for High-IQ blacks – Encouraging educated, healthy blacks to have more children. For example, scientific foundations could give more grant funding to applicants who have children.”
Allow me to please pick myself up off the floor here– Are you seriously suggesting we must bribe smart blacks who are already totally pampered, & catered to, in modern Western societies to sow their seed more??
“If Western governments and charities truly want to help Africa, they should…”
It should be obvious by now, our hijacked Western governments do not care to be “helpful to Africans” but instead want to be hurtful to racially conscious White gentiles who have the grit and strength to give these anti 1A & anti 2A genocidal control freaks the fight of their lives.
Even within America, Vincent James has shared research by the Obama Admin & HUD proving that not only does dense black low-income racial integration forced upon White suburbs, not help blacks At All, but it actually ends up making them even more dependent on government assistance; and as an added bonus, it destroys the cultural integrity and safety of the former White suburban neighborhoods, and the real estate values in those areas, from which there is usually no recovery ever.
“Nazi atrocities…”
? Please study uncensored history to learn to distinguish truth from war propaganda. http://www.codoh.com
Is Goad coming back or not? He’s been gone since February. He’s had a long enough break. Couldn’t even give the CC audience the heads up of if he’s ever coming back?
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.