The Union Jackal
May 2025

2,148 words

Black fatigue UK

Not all imports from America to the UK are healthy, but there is one which is definitely welcome in beleaguered Britain, tariff or no tariff: black fatigue. This construction has gone viral in the US, and British commentators are beginning to follow suit. It’s an interesting little buzz-phrase, “black fatigue”, because it means two totally different things at the same time. The term has cognitive dissonance.

Feed it into Google, and you get a page summed up in the words of a woman who supposedly came up with the phrase, someone called Mary-Frances Winters. Black fatigue is defined as follows: “The chronic exhaustion Black [sic] communities endure from systemic racism”.

Ho hum. So far, so much black protectionism. Now, however, the script has been flipped, as black fatigue has been claimed by Whitey, at least in the US, where black fatigue doesn’t need to be dressed up in the language of faux academia, as with Critical Race Theory (CRT). It conveys a simple message: “Hello, black people. White people here. We are sick of your shit.” This attitude is just beginning, at glacial speed, to become a reality, and we must hurry it along in any way we can. But how will it fare in the UK, a collection of nations which supposedly has, as its Prime Minister lyingly told J. D. Vance and President Trump in the Oval Office, “a long tradition of free speech” he intends to maintain?

Over thirty people a day, according to Britain’s Free Speech Union, – and that statistic is from a paywalled Times article – are now being arrested in the UK for “online hate speech”, and this statistic alone will retard the use of the phrase “black fatigue”. Blacks and Muslims are both protected species in Britain, and any criticism of either on social media will bring you to the attention of the police, unlike, say, your house being burgled. But the arrival of the genetically modified version of “black fatigue” coincides with an interesting shift in language usage in some right-of-center quarters over the last year.

From the two main right-of-center news channels, GB News and Talk TV, down through the online guild of YouTubers and social media commentators, awareness of blancophobia has hit town. Again, this happened first in the US but, nervously and tentatively over the last 12 months, British political observers are starting to use the term “anti-white racism”. Ex-MP Rupert Lowe, recently thrown out of Reform UK for offending Nigel Farage’s narcissism and Caesarism, was the first politician to use the phrase, as far as I am aware. Of course, from the perspective of the Left, this is a phrase that has no meaning. It is a central tenet of CRT that it is not possible for non-whites to be racist towards whites. There is no justification for this ex cathedra statement, but there doesn’t need to be. The black caucus has spoken, and that is enough. We whites just have to respect that. The word “respect” made its way into the limited black vocabulary long ago along with its antonym, “disrespect”. Yet respect is the one thing they fail to show to white society, that from which many of them leech. We would just like to say to blacks, with all due respect, that we have had enough of you, we’re tired of your antics and ingratitude. We’re up to here with the whining, the false claims about your history, the street crime, the positive affirmation, the whole black deal.  We are all suffering from black fatigue, and your time may be up.

A race war looks more likely in the US than the UK, which has fewer blacks per capita and its own set of social problems, but it is long overdue in both. Sooner would be preferable to later, and the immediate adoption of the phrase “black fatigue” – in its white sense – can only hurry things along. So, use it as much as you can.

Ukrainian firestarter

For someone so utterly devoid of human personality, Keir Starmer has attracted some of the most bizarre media stories ever attached to a British Prime Minister. The latest involves arson. Two properties and one vehicle with definite links to Starmer were torched in May, and three arrests have been made, at the time of writing, in connection with these alleged arson attacks.

When I first saw this story, my immediate reaction was that there was a false flag on the horizon. This, thought I, is going to be pinned on the chimerical British “far right”, a faction which simply does not exist. I should know. I’ve researched it enough and spoken to some of the people branded with this ideological cattle-mark. But no, the alleged perpetrators of these three attacks are two Ukrainians and a Ukrainian-born Romanian. Diversity, as our leaders often remind us, is our strength, at least when it comes to setting things on fire.

The first thing that pulled on my coat was how some amateur Baader-Meinhof copyists could find three locations legally tied to Britain’s Prime Minister. Hey, British security forces, when you’ve finished your donut and your DEI pamphlet about how black people are better than you, any chance of getting back to work? Secondly, let’s have a look at the bad boys currently under lock and key for this flameout. The first one is a white, English, right-wing fascist. Just kidding. He probably is a genuine fascist, though, given his country of origin. He’s from our favorite country, the one that let a million Twitter avatars bloom. He’s Ukrainian. He’s also gay and a male model, as is the Romanian, to whom we will return.

Now, if the Ukrainian had a political motive connected with his country’s war against Russia, it does seem a tad ungrateful to burn down the PM’s property. What’s wrong with the Russian Embassy? Starmer has been one of Zelensky’s fanboys from the start of his tenure as PM, and has signed away a lot of British taxpayers’ money to his country. Is this a political demand, as this kind of attack often is? What does this firestarter want? For Starmer to guarantee financial support to Ukraine for 100 years, or something? Oh, wait. This just in…

This is from The House of Lords Library, explaining that Starmer signed a deal guaranteeing financial support to Ukraine for a full century. It’s one of those stories – and they are increasing in number – which makes me check it again the day after I read it, taking care in case I dreamt the whole thing. No, I didn’t. Starmer has signed away money to Ukraine – which no one knows if the UK will have – for 100 years. So, if the Ukrainian wants more cash for his country, why firebomb the man who is giving money away like a shore-leave sailor? There must be another reason., and the internet is awash with rumor, much of which concerns the PM’s sexual preferences.

Two of the men arrested for these arson attacks are gay. It’s funny, actually, in the UK at the moment. Ordinary people are bombarded with the word “queer” down every leafy avenue, but if a straight, white, male says it, pearls are clutched and cocktails are spilled. So, “gay” it is. For some time, however, there has been a gathering storm-cloud of rumor that Keir Starmer is not as straightforwardly heterosexual as his marriage, late in life as it was, would suggest. His Jewish wife is rarely seen in public, and doesn’t look too sunny when she does make an appearance.

If Starmer bats for the other team, what of it? It’s all the rage now, and a gay MP – let alone a gay PM – would be seen as an asset to the globalist enterprise Starmer was hired to run the British chapter of. There will be a trans MP before long, you mark my words. The whole thing is beginning to be reminiscent of a political scandal from Britain’s past involving homosexuality, the Jeremy Thorpe affair. Older British readers may remember Norman Scott, a homosexual man whose liaisons with the former Liberal MP caused the resignation of a British Prime Minister. As with Watergate, it wasn’t the misdeed that caused the problem, it was the cover-up. Is this happening again in the UK? The British MSM have treated this story much as a person would have treated a leper in, say, 1500. They are not touching it with a long pole, something which always makes me pay attention to any story. They report the bare bones, but have no inclination for old-fashioned investigative journalism.

George Galloway is a rogue British politician who is astute and intelligent despite his rabid Socialism. This is from a social media post of his which touches the parts the British MSM won’t:

How did a Ukrainian male-model aged 21 with limited skills in English locate three properties [it’s actually two] and a car currently or formerly owned by Keir Starmer and allegedly firebomb them? And why? Do we have any journalists left in Britain?

That’s a very good question. The average British MSM hack nowadays is more activist than journalist.

Black lies matter

A book entitled Brilliant Black British History is the latest instalment of the historical inaccuracies currently active in British classrooms, and which claim black people more or less built Britain by themselves. The author is described as “a Nigerian-born British man”, which sets the scene adequately. The ancient monument of Stonehenge is the latest piece of unquestionably white history to be blackwashed, and was apparently built by blacks 7,000 years before the white man showed up.

Black enablers have been rather clever here, in terms of social engineering. That’s probably because those enablers are white liberals. They know that white people over, say, 40 years of age, will not buy any of the crap about a black Anne Boleyn and black Romans and a black-built Stonehenge and so on. But kids? Sponges. They will soak up any old nonsense if it comes from teacher. Funny how some vestigial authority remains in the teaching profession – provided it is useful to the deep state. So, these kids will grow up believing that blacks have not only always been around in Britain, from Druid to Roman to Tudor, but that they created the nation. Once again, it is outlier commentators who highlight the absurd deceit behind all this, with the MSM nowhere to be seen other than basic reportage. The country that created one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen no longer works properly, and blacks certainly have some input there.

Lucy inside with diversity

Lucy Connolly reminds me of the severed heads on pikestaffs that used to be displayed outside the Tower of London, pour encourager les autres. Ms. Connolly is a 30-year-old mother who lost her first child to illness and was, until her recent incarceration, looking after her very sick husband, along with her second child. She is now in jail, and has just lost an appeal against her sentence. Her offence? She posted on X, during the Southport riots last year, that she wouldn’t care if “every effing mosque in the country” was burnt down. (Those Ukrainian lads would have come in useful). Having calmed down a few hours later, she deleted the post, but it was already too late. She was arrested in front of her family, tried with epic dispatch, and sentenced to 31 months in jail. She had no criminal record and a spotless character, her errant post aside. For context, a Muslim man who was convicted of having sex with very young children recently had his sentence reduced to 30 months, one less than Ms. Connolly.

Katie Hopkins is an interesting character. Her piece here on Lucy Connolly makes a very interesting point. Lucy is not a prisoner, Hopkins says. She is a hostage of the British state. Tommy Robinson is exactly the same. It has just been announced that he is going to be released early from jail. Immediately, he is to be re-arrested on another charge relating to alleged harassment of journalists who pursued him and his family on holiday in Cyprus, photographing his children. This is pure taunting, the same goading of the white British that has been a feature of the Starmer administration. A black Labour politician who suggested what should be done with the “far right” by making a throat-slitting gesture on TV last year has yet to come to trial. The phrase “two-tier justice”, and the PM’s epithet, “two-tier Keir”, has aggravated the government so much there has been talk of putting it on the proscribed list, along with any mention of Muslim grooming gangs or immigration. The fact that it obviously exists is no defense. Reality now is no longer the real, but what the left say it is.

This is how it’s gone on in the Union Kingdom.
The Union Jackal.