The Union Jackal
October 2024

2,561 words

Peter Lynch. Photo courtesy of South Yorkshire Police.

Peter Lynch, RIP

The August rioting across England is being used to snuff out dissent in exactly the same way as the American deep state used January 6, 2021. Absurdly disproportionate sentences have been handed down in the UK for such “crimes” as social media posts and attending demonstrations, and now the Starmer government can congratulate itself on its first kill.

Peter Lynch, now the late Peter Lynch, was a 61-year-old father and grandfather who attended the scene of a riot. He held a placard accusing the police of being “corrupt scum” and shouted the same message at officers. The placard also listed various concerns usually bracketed with globalism, including BlackRock and the “Deep State”. He was also heard to have shouted, “I pray for my children!” and, as we well know, any Christian affiliation in the West automatically makes the believer a target for that same deep state. The Daily Telegraph reports that Mr. Lynch was charged with “violent disorder”, which is confusing given the presiding judge’s summing-up before sentencing.

In sentencing Mr. Lynch, the judge, Jeremy Richardson KC, made it clear to the defendant that although Mr. Lynch had committed no crime of violence, he was obliged to issue a custodial sentence. It’s just as well he hadn’t been violent, because as things stood Peter’s placard and his big mouth earned him a sentence of 32 months, of which he served two before his death last week. It may add context to learn that Judge Robertson has treated a paedophile leniently in the past because he feared for the man’s likely fate in jail. No such leniency was extended to Peter Lynch, a man who did not have pornographic images of minors on his hard drive, and had not attempted to have sex with under-age girls, but rather had yelled at some policemen.

How did Peter Lynch die? Details have not been released, and this is common in high-profile British prison fatalities. There will be an internal investigation by the Prison Ombudsman but, as with the equivalent process regularly carried out by the police via the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission), doubts about the integrity of such internal probity are beginning to be voiced even in the media. Consider the case of Kevin Crehan.

In 2016, Mr. Crehan, 18, was given a year’s jail sentence for placing bacon on the door-handle of a mosque. He served exactly half of his sentence before being found dead in his cell. The timeframe is interesting in itself. It is customary in Britain for a jail sentence to be automatically halved for good behavior, and therefore with Mr. Crehan having served six months of a 12–month sentence, he would have been due for release at the time of his death, given a record of good behavior. Granted that the media enjoy smearing white men of the perceived “far Right”, had Crehan committed further offences while in jail and thus been held to his full sentence, the MSM would have trumpeted the fact. But there is no such record of any further infraction. He must have died just as he was due for parole.

Mr. Crehan’s death was also the subject of an internal investigation, and the resulting verdict was that his death was caused by an overdose of drugs, including methadone. Now, I don’t know if they have a bit of a backlog in the autopsy department up there in Bristol, but even his family did not learn Kevin’s cause of death until 2018, two years after he died. That’s one hell of a post-mortem. Boy, they must have been thorough.

One last point. After the first wave of imprisonments, and gasps of shock at their severity from everyone who isn’t a mainstream journalist, a government spokesman made this rather curious announcement. Unless I am misreading his words, he is telling white people who have been sent to prison after rioting that they will be the target of Muslims once in jail. What he says is curiously worded, and I am no lawyer, but if his short statement is not akin to incitement to violence, it must be a very near miss.

The British judicial system is now a tool of the British deep state (the one Peter Lynch correctly feared) which is in turn a delivery system for globalist concerns. Just as (I believe) The Netherlands was used to test-run the war on small farmers, Ireland was the laboratory for mass immigration into a country with a small population, and Canada was the crash-test dummy for financially demobilising citizen movements following Trudeau’s campaign against the truckers, so too I find the UK judiciary guilty of being the lab rats for a weaponised legal system aimed at eradicating dissent. Hanging’s too good for ‘em.

Hamlet Without the Prince

Last Saturday’s Uniting the Kingdom rally in London was a further example of the mobilisation of the British legal system to serve darker ends than those for which they were intended. The third rally of its type, this is very much Tommy Robinson’s show. Unfortunately, although well attended, Saturday’s march was Hamlet without the prince as Robinson was in jail.

Robinson had arrived back in England a few days before the event expecting to be arrested at the airport. When this did not happen, Robinson waited until Friday and surrendered himself to police. It may be that the deep state, and its provisional wing in the police force, were going to arrest Robinson in public at the event, and he wanted to avoid the trouble this might have caused at the rally, and that the media were desperate for. He attended the Crown Court on Monday morning and pled guilty to contempt of court. He has been sentenced to 18 months in jail, as well as facing another charge stemming from his refusal to give police the PIN number for his phone after his arrest for absurdly trumped-up “terrorism charges”. One way or another, Starmer’s people are going to jail Robinson, who told me over the telephone ten years ago that he fully expected to die in jail.

The rally itself – estimated at 100,000 people – went off without incident, despite provocation from the Crazy Larries of the far Left. We will rejoin it a little later, but just four arrests were made. Two of those were for minor offences by pro-Robinson marchers, the other two for assault by people affiliated with a “Stand Up to Racism” counter-rally.

Robinson is not only the bête noire of the British Left, but many on the Right dislike him. For some, his claim to be a Zionist, plus being photographed with Jewish friends Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, is more than sufficient to damn him. Others may be suffering from vestigial class snobbery. Many on the Right are really quite bourgeois, and they have an ingrained dislike of oiks like Robinson.

If Robinson should die in jail, then an already tense and unstable national mood may become something different. Many people at the march wore Peter Lynch T-shirts, and many more deaths like that might be too much for some. Britain, like America, is moving closer to, rather than further away from, a civil war, whatever form that might take.

Being Charged Twice

As reliably predictable in England as the changing seasons and the turning tides, talk of reparations is blowing through the corridors of power once more. Yes, it’s time for British shareholders to consider putting their portfolio into fried chicken and hair weaves, because it sho’ nuff Reparation Time agin!

This time around the block, it is merely the Caribbean islands who are whining for handouts from the white devil, but King Charles is using all his royal politesse to avoid the subject on his current tour of Commonwealth countries. If the diplomatic grifters of the Bahamas ring the lemons and get some cash out of whitey’s deep pockets, every other country in the old Empire will be jostling for position right behind them. Yelling loudest for a cash payout back in the British House of Commons was, it almost goes without saying, mastermind and affirmative action Foreign Secretary, David “Marie Antoinette” Lammy.

You reach the point with the reparations argument at which you even tire of wheeling out the familiar facts that destroy any such claim, despite being entirely ignored by both the black caucus and the media. Yes, we know that Britain – and particularly England – ended the Transatlantic slave trade two centuries ago. We are all too aware that the Islamic slave trade was far greater and lasted far longer. And we know that the slave traders at source were almost all black Africans who sold their goods on to white men. In fact, blacks should reimburse whites for making us the victims of restrictive trading practices. When it came time to go to market for slaves, the white man paid retail prices and the wholesalers were black. We want some of our money back, brothers. We were overcharged then, and reparations of any sort would lead to us being conned once more.

So far, Britain has paid lip service to the grasping black activists currently posing as leaders in some Commonwealth nations, and Keir Starmer managed at least to kick the can a little further down the road to contrition. There is a weaselly paragraph in a document he signed at a Commonwealth summit which opens the door to negotiations, and Starmer will doubtless try to fudge some cock-eyed program of “debt relief” and “investment” which will in reality be reparations by the back door. It will be interesting to see how much money he can raise that way, however, as one estimate of the final bill for having a few slaves around the place is £18 trillion. You can buy a lot of fried chicken with that kind of money.

The clause in the document Starmer signed, which lets whites know that once they are gone from the summit they will not be forgotten, begins as follows: “[We agree] that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity.”

Translated from the language of darkest Africa, this means, “Give us the wallet, white boy, plus we’ll take the ring and the watch”. It is less taking a stand and more “stand and deliver”.

On a slightly more abstract level, it has not yet been revealed where the sacred law is writ that says that generations of white people should pay for the perceived crimes of their distant ancestors. How far back do we have to go? And who gets to say how far back we have to go? These odd sorts of rules and laws and protocols seem to crop up a lot where black people are concerned. If a black man – and particularly a black woman – says something concerning race (which is currently everything) then it has all the infallibility of a Medieval Papal Bull.

So, it needs saying and saying again. British blacks cost the white British taxpayer a lot of money. They clog up the courts, the Accident & Emergency departments of hospitals, and the jails. None of that comes for free. As for the cultural cost of having black people infesting the place, why not turn to a case study?

Looking for the British George Floyd

Chris Kaba was a young, black trainee architect – and father-to-be – with a promising future ahead of him when he was gunned down by a racist white British police officer in 2016. Oh, my mistake. I was reading the family’s version of Mr. Kaba’s life, the one gleefully and unquestioningly taken up by the blancophobic British media. In short, and to be technically accurate, Mr. Chris Kaba was actually a piece of shit, a man very much in George Floyd’s pug-ugly mould. A drug-dealer who allegedly himself gunned someone down in a nightclub, Kaba had a restraining order in place from the courts to keep him away from the mother of his child. Oh, and he was a drill-rapper, and if you don’t know what that is it’s best you keep it that way. It is a form of “music” prevalent in south London which is ugly, violent, and threatening even by black standards, and most of the “lyrics” deal with the wish of the “rapper” to kill other drill-rappers. What a pleasure it must be to know these people in private life.

Kaba was trying to escape police after a creditable tip-off led officers to believe he was armed and the car he was driving had been present at a shooting. He rammed a police car, refused to show his empty hands as requested by officers, and generally broke every one of the rules laid down by black comedian Chris Rock in his skit, How not to get your ass kicked by the police.

Even though Chris Kaba is dead, the BBC managed to enlist his help in their efforts to ignore the march noted above. An organisation called “United Friends and Families Campaign” also attended the march, and their number included members of the late Mr. Kaba’s family. This enabled the BBC to concentrate on a couple of hundred black people venting the usual grievances in Trafalgar Square while apparently failing to notice the tens of thousands of white people doing the same thing.

The fact that there was no violence left the “state broadcaster”, the BBC, without the footage of neo-Nazis sieg-heiling for which they had hoped, and the general personality type of the small “Stand up to Racism” demonstration can be seen from about 1:00 here. The brown-skinned, smiling citizen journalist filming them and being taunted by them is Mahyar Tousi, originally a refugee from Iran. They are chanting “Nazi scum, off our streets!” at him, as well as urging him to commit suicide. You will also see copies of the old Marxist warhorse, Socialist Worker, with the playful and non-inflammatory headline: SMASH FASCISTS OFF OUR STREETS! Charming, as English people of my parents’ generation would say ironically.

This is another of the institutional myths sanctioned by the media and under-written by the government: The “anti-fascist” Left are morally impeccable, everyone voicing concern about immigration is a hate-filled racist. Perhaps it’s hate-filled racists who are required, who can say? The police officer who shot Kaba has just been acquitted of murder (after a miserable two years waiting to come to trial) further enraging a black “community” whose default position is rage.

This is all a tangled web in which Peter Lynch, Chris Kaba, Tommy Robinson and Keir Starmer’s personal police force are intertwined. But it is a web. It has both spider and flies. The common thread that linked the two anti-establishment election results in 2016 – Trump and Brexit – is that the existence of a deep state on either side of the Atlantic was finally revealed. In the USA, it is Donald Trump the deep state is trying to have killed, while in Britain it is Tommy Robinson who is on their deep state’s kill list. Should either or both of these men die unnatural deaths, the response from the white people both deep states despise may signal a new phase in the war.

Rest in peace, Peter Lynch.

The Union Jackal