Washing Away the NAXALT Fallacy

577 words

Do you wash your hands before eating?

We all wash our hands before we eat so that bacteria and physical impurities don’t get into our food, and so that we don’t have to eat our food with sand and dirt, for example. That would be unpleasant and would cause tooth abrasion. No one would dispute, however, that good bacteria or vitamins from previous food could theoretically enter the body. Some cultures have incorporated hand-washing into their religious practice, so it is an important act for them. And not all bacteria is bad; the gut microflora bacterium E. coli is good at preventing the spread of pathogenic bacteria and is involved in the production of some vitamins (e.g. vitamin K), but this bacteria is not good in the mouth. Everything belongs somewhere and non-whites don’t belong in white lands. If you put all the good ingredients – bacon, milk, sausage, honey, spinach, fruit, etc. – into a cake, it’ll make you sick. Some things can’t be mixed even if they’re good on their own. It’s the same with the colours of the rainbow. If you mix them all together you get brown, even though each colour is valuable on its own. If we want true diversity, we have to keep all ethnicities separate from each other as not all ethnicities can be placed together. In a zoo, different animals are kept separately, and if you remove the barriers there will be chaos and the destruction of many species. You don’t get racial diversity, and it’s the same with humans.

In dogs, it is also important to preserve the purity and best qualities of the breed, and no one would cross a pure-bred St. Bernard with a greyhound even if both were good examples of the breeds. It is time to end multiculturalism because it is not working and is leading to the extinction of our race.

Yes, not all blacks are bad, but non-white immigration is destroying our country as these people are non-integrable in the long term. They bully white kids in schools, practice grooming, and have too high a crime rate. Yes, not everyone does it, but we want some grooming or no grooming. We want black kids bullying white kids in schools or no bullying in schools. Either we want high crime or minimal crime. We want quality math and philosophy or we want math and philosophy banned because they are racist. We want to survive as a race and leave this country to our children or we want to be the most hated minority in a racial chaos.

Do we want all of the above to some degree? How do non-whites benefit white countries? Is there a future for white countries with multiculturalism, or will the grooming and bullying of white children in schools only increase with the number of non-whites? The only permanent and correct solution is repatriation, first and foremost of criminals. Secondly, there should be financial incentives for recently arrived non-whites to return to their countries.Thirdly, expropriation of anti-white corporations and businesses must accompany legislation making anti-white subversion a crime.

Our biggest problem is that the NAXALT argument is only used by whites. Elsewhere, each group is working very hard to defend their own interests, and if we want to survive as a group we must also defend our own interests. No one will do it for us.

This article is part of the Counter-Currents NAXALT Contest. Submit yours before the October 2 deadline!