From WhiteDate.net
1,965 words
The defining characteristic of twenty-first-century social interaction is the movement from in-person human contact towards moderated interaction online, increasingly manipulated as if human beings are livestock in a laboratory experiment. One of the most frightening aspects of this Big Brother scenario is that our digital overlords in Left-wing Silicon Valley seem to have a definite opinion about our racial dating preferences. They really do not want white people to meet each other and fall in love when they can be having someone else’s babies.
Is this a crazy conspiracy theory? Why don’t you try a few experiments at home? If you have an iPhone, open the app store and search “dating apps for blacks.”
Now try replacing blacks with “Latinos,” “Jews,” and “Asians.”
All good so far, right? Now try replacing it with “Whites.” Suddenly Apple wants you to think about trying “interracial dating” instead.
In contrast to Big Tech’s promotion of apps for Latinos, Jews, and other groups to meet each other online, WhiteDate.net, a site created specifically for white people looking to date other whites, has been banned on Big Tech sites like Google, YouTube, Instagram, Coinbase, and Reddit.
Typical example of banned WhiteDate.net content
Let’s try another, similar experiment. Go to Google and image search “pregnant black woman.” We get a number of extremely accurate, normal depictions:
Are you ready to try “pregnant white woman”? Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
If you Google image search “white dating,” five out of six images depict interracial relationships, and the sixth image is from a VOX hit piece on how racist a dating website aimed at white people is:
In a recent Google search for “happy white woman,” I found that eight out of 12 results in a typical sample depicted white women with black boyfriends or babies:
These search results are not the outcome of happenstance, but the direct consequence of the biases programmed into the algorithms by human beings in Silicon Valley. Greg Coppola, a former senior software engineer at Google turned whistleblower, told Project Veritas:
I have a PhD, I have five years’ experience at Google, and I just know how algorithms are. They don’t write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do. . . . And I think more generally we have to just decide now that we kind of are seeing tech use its power to manipulate people. It’s a time to decide, you know, do we run the technology, does the technology run us?
Google internal e-mails were leaked in 2018 detailing discussions around using “ephemeral experiences,” or short-lived manipulative tools like search recommendations, to transform public opinion and behaviors at the level of whole populations.[1]
You can buy Greg Johnson’s It’s Okay to Be White here.
Robert Epstein, the Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, has conducted rigorous controlled experiments around about a dozen forms of online manipulation by Big Tech companies like Google. He’s found that exposure to these manipulation tools can shift things like the voting preferences of undecided voters by as much as 80% in certain demographic groups.[2]
Of course, no one in academia is going to connect this kind of research to manipulating preferences for interracial dating because they wouldn’t be able to admit that doing such a thing would be a social ill. But it is clearly applicable nonetheless.
For years, Left-wing media articles have decried the “racism” of online dating apps, particularly those which allow users to filter matches by ethnicity the way that they allow women to discriminate against short or poor men, and men to filter out older women and single mothers.[3]
Many of these articles were inspired by a paper authored by radical Leftist researchers at Cornell University titled, “Debiasing Desire: Addressing Bias and Discrimination on Intimate Platforms.” The mission statement of the paper stated, “Dating platforms have the opportunity to disrupt particular social structures (emphasis added), but you lose those benefits when you have design features that allow you to remove people who are different than you.”
To descramble the coded Left-wing language, white couples being able to meet and fall in love with one another is a “social structure” (aka white supremacy) that must be “disrupt(ed)” by forcing them to consider interracial partners on dating sites against their will.
The paper is careful to clarify that it would be “inappropriate” for algorithms to prevent Jews and other non-whites from dating within their race. Only whites are a “categor(y) palatable for such intervention.”
The researchers went on to advocate that dating apps remove the “ethnicity filters” which give users the ability to limit results to the race of the partner they want to date.
During the 2020 Floyd riots, Left-wing neo-eugenics professors Vikram R. Bhargava and Suneal Bedi advocated invasive manipulation of dating app algorithms to derank users who don’t select black partners:
Are users who swipe left on every black profile the kind of users dating apps want? Dating apps already ban users for sending unsolicited sexual content — why not implement measures to discourage bigoted swiping? This does not mean that bigoted users must be banned, but the algorithms could at least deprioritize such users in their match algorithms. [emphasis added]
The professors advocate exploiting technology’s manipulative potential to remove racial preferences in the dating population altogether:
Some might think that we have made a large assumption in that excluding black people from sexual consideration is bigoted. That could just be a personal preference? Preferences, however, are neither immutable, nor insulated from critical scrutiny.[4]
Dating apps with ethnicity filters appear to be in the minority, with free apps like Bumble, Tinder, and Badoo disallowing the option. Only a few free apps allow ethnicity filtering, such as Coffee Meets Bagel, Plenty of Fish, and Hinge. OkCupid allows the feature, but only for premium subscribers. Paid service Match.com also allows ethnicity filtering.
We have seen that Big Tech is only too willing to enable everyone except white people to look for love amongst their own group. The reason for the moral panic is that data has suggested that most white people tend to prefer dating within their race, and that white men are the most desired race of men by all types of women except black women. Black women are, for the record, the least desired female racial group.[5]
Thus, despite the ubiquitous pseudo-intellectual opinion pieces and academic papers on how threatened society is by black male sexuality, it is actually white male sexuality that has Silicon Valley, academia, and the mainstream press twisted up into knots.
One minute we are using our white privilege to score all the ladies at the expense of non-white men, and the next we’re rage-filled incels, depending on which narrative attack is preferred that day.[6]
The public deserves to know that Left-wing social engineers, academics, and intellectuals are devoting considerable time and effort to conducting behavioral experiments on white people to discover with scientific precision how to control their in-group preferences so they will birth the rootless global mulatto consumerist race of the future.
For instance, a study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology in 2016 titled “Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time” was apparently so important that it was authored by 29 different researchers who “tested 9 interventions . . . to reduce implicit racial preferences over time.” Other studies in this hugely-resourced field include “Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias,” “The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias,” and “Reducing implicit racial preferences.”
If you don’t think the Silicon Valley honchos are using dating apps to conduct experiments on human subjects, maybe you haven’t read the blog of OKCupid founder Christian Rudder where he proclaimed, “We experiment on human beings . . . That’s how websites work.”[7]
There is some dispute about whether racial preferences in dating have changed since 2014, when we had our last good batch of data from OkCupid. Apparently the percentage of users who strongly preferred to date someone of their own race was trending down, according to this chart from Rudder’s blog:
Rudder, who has since shut his blog down, is a white Obama voter in an interracial marriage with an Indian woman, Reshma Patel.[8]
Here’s another important metric to keep in mind. One-in-seven, or 14%, of infants born in the United States were multiracial in 2015, compared to just 5% in 1980, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data. That is an increase of nearly 300%.[9]
Whites have dropped precipitously as a percentage of the US population between the 1950 and 2020 censuses. In 1950, whites were 89.3% of the population, compared to just 58% in 2020. That’s a decrease of 31.3% in less than a century.[10]
While skeptical of its overall value, Ryan Wade, an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois-Champaign School of Social Work, admitted to Rolling Stone that “removing ethnicity filters does implicitly promote the idea that race should not be a criteria for partner selection.”
In actual terms, what this means is that white users of most of these apps are forced to scroll through thousands of overtly sexual advertisements from partners of “diverse racial backgrounds” because of the app provides’ manipulative racial agenda.
Almost all of the most popular dating apps have expressed support for and donated to the radical anti-white Black Lives Matter movement. This includes OkCupid, Badoo, and Tinder.
Behavioral psychologists have already explored the implications of things like conditioning and the persuasive efficacy of advertising. Justin Lane is an Oxford University-trained artificial intelligence (AI) expert who co-founded the international data analytics company, alan. He therefore knows something about the intentionality and bias of the algorithms programmers are creating to manipulate the population:[11]
They’re being actively manipulated in the sense that anyone who’s ever turned on a TV or a radio has been manipulated. Marketing exists to manipulate us by ensuring that the moment we need something, we’re going to need a specific brand [emphasis added]. That’s the genius of advertising. It’s just scalable to a level we’ve never imagined with the data that social media has, and the number of people engaged on a single platform.
At the same time, there’s also passive manipulation, which has to do with what a company allows on their site — how they are producing and changing, algorithmically, the information that we see.
The increasing dystopia we are witnessing where whites are being driven into persecuted minority status in our own nations is not an accident, but the direct result, in part, of nightmarish social engineering experiments conducted on us by tech oligarchs, exacerbating the effects of the open-borders agenda.
Jason Kessler (e-mail him) is a journalist and civil rights activist with bylines at VDARE, Daily Caller, and GotNews, as well as his own site, JasonKessler.us. Follow him on Telegram, Gab, and Twitter, and subscribe to his news and opinion show Happenings on Odysee and Rumble.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
Notes
[1] John D. McKinnon, “Google Workers Discussed Tweaking Search Function to Counter Travel BanWall Street Journal, September 20, 2018.
[2] Robert Epstein, “Google Is Shifting Votes On A Massive Scale, But A Solution Is At Hand,” Daily Caller, November 6, 2022.
[3] Lester Fabian Brathwaite, “Why Dating Apps Are Racist AF — With or Without Ethnicity Filters,” Rolling Stone, August 21, 2020.
[4] Vikram R. Bhargava & Suneal Bedi, “OPINION: Are online dating companies swiping left on Black Lives Matter?”, Reuters, June 13, 2020.
[5] Ritchie King, “The uncomfortable racial preferences revealed by online dating,” by Quartz, November 20, 2013.
[6] Conor Lynch, “Angry young white men, the ‘incel rebellion’ and an age of worldwide reaction,” Salon, May 12, 2018
[7] Taylor Wofford, OkCupid Co-Founder: “We Experiment on Human Beings . . . That’s How Websites Work,” Newsweek, July 28, 2014.
[8] Liz Robbins, “How Christian Rudder, a Founder of OKCupid, Spends His Sunday,” The New York Times, February 13, 2015.
[9] Gretchen Livingston, “The rise of multiracial and multiethnic babies in the U.S.,” Pew Research Center, June 6, 2017.
[10] Sam Levine, “US’s white population declines for first time ever, 2020 census finds,” The Guardian, August 12, 2021.
[11] Joe Allen, “Artificial Intelligence Expert Explains How Big Tech Manipulates What You Think,” The Federalist, March 12, 2021.
33 comments
Fantastic article Jason! Also worth mentioning is the constant barrage of interracial couples in every single commercial you see on television these days. What’s funny is you never see one with the most common interracial couple out there; the nice white woman with a tattooed, dreadlocked thug that treats her like dirt. Always some nerdy white dude with a strong sistah or my favorite, the one I saw of an Asian man with his Nubian princess. That’s like seeing a sasquatch riding a unicorn.
When it comes to marriage stats at least, the most common interracial couple is a white guy with an Asian woman: https://thoughtcatalog.com/jim-goad/2014/05/2-cute-handy-charts-on-interracial-marriage-divorce/
that’s disgusting
You make it sound like white men are the purveyors of this. White men default to yellow fever because they are passed over by white women. A white man never chooses a nonwhite over a white woman.
John Derbyshire unavailable for comment at this moment.
I think Mr. Derbyshire would be quite surprised to be referred to as a race traitor.
Some people just have bad taste and/or are race traitors
producing non-white offspring is race treachery
“A white man never chooses a nonwhite over a white woman.”
Link?
What’s both sad and hilarious here is that you have a contingent of extremely online meme zombies who’ve been so brainwashed into blaming white women for ALL of their problems, they’ll blame white women even when a white guy chooses a nonwhite woman. And they never pause to consider that maybe it’s their attitude toward white women that contributes to their lack of success with them. Blaming white women for EVERYTHING is an antiwhite psyop that may ultimately lead to fewer white babies than interracial dating sites. Don’t fall for it.
“Yeah, let’s have a pro-white movement that relentlessly demonizes white women more than it defames any other group! THAT’S the ticket toward demographic victory!” For fuck’s sake, pull your heads out of your memes.
Idk if he meant to blame white women, but as a matter of fact white men who are incapable of attracting white women default to non-white females. That’s a fact, and I’m blaming the men.
I’m not sure how you got all that from my comment because I love white women, I love my people and I even love you.
https://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on-dating-apps
But there’s no getting around this fact. Women are far more judicious, especially white women. So what do you expect these white incels to do? Have unrequited loyalty and allow their bloodlines and sex lives to end simply because white women have decided they aren’t worthy, even over other races?
I also question your source too because there are way more blacks and Hispanics in this country than Asians. WM/AF outnumbering BM/WW just doesn’t add up. Even if it did, why would that suddenly excuse them?
I’m against miscegenation insofar as reproduction of hybridized monstrosities, but if leftover and passed over white men want to conquer nonwhite women, which let me remind you has always been a demoralization campaign as part of all wars, why should they put on the glinting armor of a white knight, which let me also remind you has never worked, to defend the ‘honor’ of white women not choosing them?
White men with nonwhite women is a tactical loss, but a strategic victory for the white race, whereas the inversion is a strategic loss and tactical loss.
There has always been a biological bottleneck, but these days it is entirely uncompromising. I would even say that white people are winning in the long run because nonwhite women all follow the lead of white women in dithering away their reproductive years, spawning this ubiquitous demographic winter across all regions, like a long European winter or a year without summer, which Europeans are best built to withstand. But that’s still a tough sell for the legions of white men who are losing out. That’s all I’m saying. If pointing this out is all it takes to scare away white women from procreating with white men, then what are we to do?
If I would stand before an option of having kids with cute and intelligent north-east asian woman, or not having them at all, I would prefer the first option.
“A white man never chooses a nonwhite over a white woman.”
But what happens to a White man who’s choices are so limited he cant get any woman at all – be they White, black, yellow, red. brown – or if they’re necrophiliacs – turquoise?
I’m sure its hard for guys in their early 20s doing dating apps. Women and men are in no rush to settle and they are all looking for the 1% because they feel they deserve it. There is that famous OK Cupid report that women on the site rated 80% of the men unattractive. Dating sites by nature are also the ‘leftovers’ of both genders. Aside from the obvious reasons, many are still single for being disproportionately picky, and they want to scour a million options in hopes of landing the cream of the crop.
If you ask a nubile white woman to draw a picture of what she envisions her dream child to look like, chances are it will look like her (including skin tone). But if you bring in a reporter and turn the cameras on, then she will probably start saying, “Oh, but I don’t know about the skin color, because you never know…I see where you might be going with this. I am open to marrying any race! Please don’t ruin my life!”.
There’s a point when her peer group starts to pair off and settle down, and that’s when the young guys will have better odds. You better have decent job prospects by then or you’re fucked… well, technically not going to be fucking. Learn how to be funny and entertaining, don’t be a whiner, and remember the world is 50% women. And for those who haven’t done much dating, get practice. You’re being forced into an arranged marriage after some coffee.
Well said, Mr. Goad.
By saying these white men are “passed over” (i.e., incels and so on) by white women and so “default” to non-white women you are implying that it is white men of “lesser value” who go for nonwhite women. Therefore, in a sense, you are justifying the current situation (of both sexes dating interracially) by presenting the situation as being one where “high quality” white men DO get with white women whereas “low quality” white men don’t (therefore, going for nonwhite women). However, this is not (always) the case. Increasingly, white women are rejecting white men regardless of “quality” – that is, you can be entirely successful and “high quality” as a white man in every aspect and still find it very hard to date white women simply BECAUSE you’re a white man.
Increasingly, in the United States, a young white woman would rather date a nonwhite man of equal or often even of LESSER quality (by many societally measured standards) than a white man (and the nonwhite doesn’t have to be and, in fact, usually isn’t black, can be hispanic, asian, arabic, even many mediterranean and southern Europeans, etc.). So, the issue is not so much, as you present, one of “low quality” white men not dating white women and “high quality” white men continuing to do so (which would, as I said above, to some extent actually justify the current situation) – it is, in fact, simply an issue of the overall disappearance of the white race in the United States, this being reflected in the exponentially decreasing number of white couples, regardless of the “quality” of the male (and, increasingly, even “in spite of” the quality of the male).
Just stop using online dating apps. Seriously.
Male users are at least double than female users on these apps, but the ratio can go much higher, even 5:1. This means that unless you’re a chad, the dynamics of these apps are already very much against you, even without shenanigans such as described. Just don’t do it, the old ways are much better.
Companies do respond in part to demands of the market. If enough people are dissatisfied with the trend the companies will switch it up, likely quietly. Especially paid platforms. But if things are allowed to worsen, how long till users are assigned a public ‘score’ on whether they are diverse enough in their preferences? Would a data leak spill this information for leftist condemnation?
I think women can be enlisted to this cause by insisting that they show increased preference for men who make substantially less money. Once that happens, all this may go away quickly.
Recommended is the documentary “The Creepy Line”, a pretty good expose of some of the sneaky things search algorithms and rankings are up to.
“Give the indigenous people part of Australia [of USA, Canada, NZ) to live among themselves.
With no White inventions or White technology.
Create the same environment they had before the White man came, after a couple of hours, they will be running back to the other side, the racist White side.”
This is another example of why we are in our destructive trajectory, we do not want to go our own way, we do not want to break away, to completely 100% separation. The correct course is to break away completely & in perpetuity. If we do not think this way, then, we are doomed, we will go extinct.
Just for the record, the dating app Hinge does allow for filtering by Ethnicity and you can select White/caucasian. Not saying this should be the app of choice, use White Date. But it was interesting to see them add that functionality.
Interesting that the Tech Tyrants are doing psychological experiments on people involving manipulation without their knowledge. Did they perchance run it by a review board first? If not, they’re in violation of the Nuremberg Protocol.
Since Greg Johnson wrote affirming that White genocide is a fact, the evidence has continued to show that not only are White genocide policies in force but they are adopted for antiwhite motives. This article provides more evidence that supports that conclusion.
Replying to Whites Unite above, Jim said MARRIAGE stats, not dating stats or baby mama stats.
@Hector at that point, it’d be better to not have any kids at all or adopt some
Just out of curiosity but what was Hitler’s thoughts on feminism?
What did he have to say about the movement? I know it was smaller in those days than it is now but still was somewhat forceful.
I don’t recall that he said anything about it. I do recall that there was a Reich women’s minister; she was pretty trad. Also, they emphasized motherhood, which was a good point, because babies don’t really come from a cabbage patch. I recall reading this snotty British propaganda book which made the Reich’s emphasis on motherhood out to be some kind of moral failing.
Just this week I received a dating request from an out-of-shape Black dude that just sent a dick pix. Of course I refused. Note that I’m white, a guy and looking for white women, not guys. This is on a free social meeting site which also does dating.
Up until last year (’22) I subscribed to 3 paid dating sites, each for 1 year. These were Bumble, Fitness Singles, and Adult Friend Finder. I’m a little older, physically fit, and had professionally taken photos. Was looking for women in my age group.
To make a long story short, after one year I found only one somewhat date-able woman, although we didn’t have many common interests. Women friends, have shown me their profiles and said that they get 300 responses per day. Thus the ratios of men to women are huge; maybe 5,000 to 1.
“Private equity giant Blackstone is to acquire a majority stake in MagicLab, the parent company of the dating and social networking apps Bumble and Badoo, among others…”
I think it’s in paid dating sites’ interest to keep white guys single and subscribing to their services, rather than to match them up with anyone and take them off the market.
There was an online webinar given by a premium dating site; it may have been Ashley Madison. They charge around $19,000. for a membership. But the webinar was run by two women, they only talked about women’s’ issues, and they only fielded questions from women.
I agree with many of Mr. Jim Goad’s comments that we shouldn’t castigate women on a men’s’ White Identitarian site {does Counter-Currents even allow women?}. But just labeling all white guys as “incels” misses the point & is not usually helpful. There is something going on in the white dating world and it is genuinely difficult for white men to find white women. This is less important for an older guy like me but is so for younger guys who are trying to find someone to marry and have a family with.
Perhaps C-C could run some articles on the practical aspects of dating for men?
Who labeled all white guys as incels?
“I consider that the tiny sliver of politically-active men who voice a concern about white demographics seem to hate white women more than even black women hate white women…”
“They act as if it’s women’s fault, rather than their own charmlessness and lack of physical desirability, for why they can’t get laid. “
“I’d be happy as a clam never talking to another guy for my entire life, …. but once I discovered pussy, it was like, “Who needs guys?””
These are taken from your article “Hey, Where Are the White Women At?”, 8/12/21.
You should realize that while there are undoubtedly some guys who do fit the descriptions in your article there are also many guys that do not. These may have difficulty in meeting women for all sorts of reasons. An example are professionals who work in an oil town. Here you simply don’t find many attractive young single datable white females drilling for crude.
Until times change, w.i. sites like CC and AR will never get a lot of women. This is just the nature of things I think. Many women are comfortable following social trends and not revolutionary political concepts. If you’re really good at attracting single women for relationships, perhaps some advice for the younger single guys on C-C would be helpful?
Actual women {not Trans, nor biological males currently identifying as a woman} might even be enticed or begged to offer up some advice in the comments section?
There is the well known quote attributed to criminal Willie Sutton. Why do you rob banks? “Because that’s where the money is.” One certainly has better odds being in a populous metro area than a remote male dominated oil town. The same is said for dating sites too. There are a million of them and many are reputed to be filled with fake female profiles. Best to use the ones with the most members. A site where the women and men have to pay for membership is going to skew to those more serious about meeting someone and not extremely picky people being entitled. Hookup websites are famously long odds for meeting a woman given the safety concerns. You would have better odds being at a bar at closing time. There are innumerable free blogs for guys on dating and ‘game’ and a number are worth a read. The paid courses seem like a waste. They are basically ‘practice’ you can get on your own with some casual dates by relaxing your standards. Practice small talk, engaging stories, building your confidence so you are ready when what you are looking for comes along. Consider mixing up the professional photos with casual ones.
Absolutely needed exposition of how the Left is managing our lives, including our most intimate dating and reproductive lives. My take on their objectives is quite simple: I think this all harks back to the “PEACE MOVEMENT” of the Sixties, and their thinking that Whites are primarily the cause of all wars (not to mention slavery and holocausts). Therefore, if Whites were cut out of the picture, we would have everlasting ‘peace’. And if all races were nicely interbred, then there would be no more inter-racial squabbling, let alone atomic wars. We’d all be peaceful brown lumps singing ‘CumByYah’ all day and sharing chitlins and lobster.
“And if all races were nicely interbred, then there would be no more inter-racial squabbling, let alone atomic wars. “
The long term goal is for Whites only to be submerged out of existence via inter-breeding with other races. Africa will still have its native population as we recognize it today as will Asia and the rest of the so-called developing world, but Europe along with its outposts in the Americas. Australasia and Southern Africa will be bereft of the people who created it.
Of course, the logical extension to this is that the other races would be incapable of sustaining an advanced & altruistic civilization. Without whites things would go back to tribalism and fighting over resources: water, land, food, and energy.
Yes, there’d be no nuclear wars. But there would also be no nuclear energy and instead just burning trees, coal, & gas for fuel. There would be no space exploration, despite the fact that NASA is training up scores of Black Astronauts for future missions.
The Chinese would probably extend a hegemony over the rest of the world and rule as an Eternal and Unchanging Empire of Zookeepers over a menagerie of squabbling monkeys.
Academia had gotten in on this propaganda. Some sociologists refer to white people preferring to date, marry, and procreate with other whites as sexual racism. Other academics pathologize it.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.