Silicon Valley’s Anti-White Racial Dysgenics Program

1,965 words

The defining characteristic of twenty-first-century social interaction is the movement from in-person human contact towards moderated interaction online, increasingly manipulated as if human beings are livestock in a laboratory experiment. One of the most frightening aspects of this Big Brother scenario is that our digital overlords in Left-wing Silicon Valley seem to have a definite opinion about our racial dating preferences. They really do not want white people to meet each other and fall in love when they can be having someone else’s babies.

Is this a crazy conspiracy theory? Why don’t you try a few experiments at home? If you have an iPhone, open the app store and search “dating apps for blacks.”

^[3]

Now try replacing blacks with “Latinos,” “Jews,” and “Asians.”

^[4]

 

All good so far, right? Now try replacing it with “Whites.” Suddenly Apple wants you to think about trying “interracial dating” instead.

^[5]

In contrast to Big Tech’s promotion of apps for Latinos, Jews, and other groups to meet each other online, WhiteDate.net ^[6], a site created specifically for white people looking to date other whites, has been banned on Big Tech sites ^[7] like Google, YouTube, Instagram, Coinbase, and Reddit.

Let’s try another, similar experiment. Go to Google and image search “pregnant black woman.” We get a number of extremely accurate, normal depictions:

^[9]

Are you ready to try “pregnant white woman”? Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

^[10]

If you Google image search “white dating,” five out of six images depict interracial relationships, and the sixth image is from a VOX hit piece on how racist a dating website aimed at white people is:

^[11]

In a recent Google search for “happy white woman,” I found that eight out of 12 results in a typical sample depicted white women with black boyfriends or babies:

^[12]These search results are not the outcome of happenstance, but the direct consequence of the biases programmed into the algorithms by human beings in Silicon Valley. Greg Coppola, a former senior software engineer at Google turned whistleblower, told Project Veritas ^[13]:

I have a PhD, I have five years’ experience at Google, and I just know how algorithms are. They don’t write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do. . . . And I think more generally we have to just decide now that we kind of are seeing tech use its power to manipulate people. It’s a time to decide, you know, do we run the technology, does the technology run us?

Google internal e-mails were leaked in 2018 detailing discussions around using “ephemeral experiences,” or short-lived manipulative tools like search recommendations, to transform public opinion and behaviors at the level of whole populations.[1] ^[14]

Robert Epstein, the Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, has conducted rigorous controlled experiments around about a dozen forms of online manipulation by Big Tech companies like Google. He’s found that exposure to these manipulation tools can shift things like the  voting preferences of undecided voters by as much as 80% in certain demographic groups.[2] ^[17]

Of course, no one in academia is going to connect this kind of research to manipulating preferences for interracial dating because they wouldn’t be able to admit that doing such a thing would be a social ill. But it is clearly applicable nonetheless.

For years, Left-wing media articles have decried the “racism” of online dating apps, particularly those which allow users to filter matches by ethnicity the way that they allow women to discriminate against short or poor men, and men to filter out older women and single mothers.[3] ^[18]

Many of these articles were inspired by a paper authored by radical Leftist researchers at Cornell University titled, “Debiasing Desire: Addressing Bias and Discrimination on Intimate Platforms ^[19].” The mission statement of the paper stated, “Dating platforms have the opportunity to disrupt particular social structures (emphasis added), but you lose those benefits when you have design features that allow you to remove people who are different than you.”

To descramble the coded Left-wing language, white couples being able to meet and fall in love with one another is a “social structure” (aka white supremacy) that must be “disrupt(ed)” by forcing them to consider interracial partners on dating sites against their will.

The paper is careful to clarify that it would be “inappropriate” for algorithms to prevent Jews and other non-whites from dating within their race. Only whites are a “categor(y) palatable for such intervention.” ^[20]

The researchers went on to advocate that dating apps remove the “ethnicity filters” which give users the ability to limit results to the race of the partner they want to date.

During the 2020 Floyd riots, Left-wing neo-eugenics professors Vikram R. Bhargava and Suneal Bedi advocated invasive manipulation of dating app algorithms to derank users who don’t select black partners:

Are users who swipe left on every black profile the kind of users dating apps want? Dating apps already ban users for sending unsolicited sexual content — why not implement measures to discourage bigoted swiping? This does not mean that bigoted users must be banned, but the algorithms could at least deprioritize such users in their match algorithms. [emphasis added]

The professors advocate exploiting technology’s manipulative potential to remove racial preferences in the dating population altogether:

Some might think that we have made a large assumption in that excluding black people from sexual consideration is bigoted. That could just be a personal preference? Preferences, however, are neither immutable, nor insulated from critical scrutiny.[4] ^[21]

Dating apps with ethnicity filters appear to be in the minority, with free apps like Bumble, Tinder, and Badoo disallowing the option. Only a few free apps allow ethnicity filtering, such as Coffee Meets Bagel, Plenty of Fish, and Hinge. OkCupid allows the feature, but only for premium subscribers. Paid service Match.com also allows ethnicity filtering.

We have seen that Big Tech is only too willing to enable everyone except white people to look for love amongst their own group. The reason for the moral panic is that data has suggested that most white people tend to prefer dating within their race, and that white men are the most desired race of men by all types of women except black women. Black women are, for the record, the least desired female racial group.[5] ^[22]

^[23]

^[24]

Thus, despite the ubiquitous pseudo-intellectual opinion pieces and academic papers on how threatened society is by black male sexuality, it is actually white male sexuality that has Silicon Valley, academia, and the mainstream press twisted up into knots.

One minute we are using our white privilege to score all the ladies at the expense of non-white men, and the next we’re rage-filled incels, depending on which narrative attack is preferred that day.[6] ^[25]

The public deserves to know that Left-wing social engineers, academics, and intellectuals are devoting considerable time and effort to conducting behavioral experiments on white people to discover with scientific precision how to control their in-group preferences so they will birth the rootless global mulatto consumerist race of the future.

For instance, a study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology in 2016 titled “Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time ^[26]” was apparently so important that it was authored by 29 different researchers who “tested 9 interventions . . . to reduce implicit racial preferences over time.” Other studies in this hugely-resourced field include “Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias ^[27],” “The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias ^[28],” and “Reducing implicit racial preferences ^[29].”

If you don’t think the Silicon Valley honchos are using dating apps to conduct experiments on human subjects, maybe you haven’t read the blog of OKCupid founder Christian Rudder where he proclaimed, “We experiment on human beings . . . That’s how websites work.”[7] ^[30]

There is some dispute about whether racial preferences in dating have changed since 2014, when we had our last good batch of data from OkCupid. Apparently the percentage of users who strongly preferred to date someone of their own race was trending down, according to this chart from Rudder’s blog ^[31]:

^[32]

Rudder, who has since shut his blog down, is a white Obama voter in an interracial marriage with an Indian woman, Reshma Patel.[8] ^[33]

Here’s another important metric to keep in mind. One-in-seven, or 14%, of infants born in the United States were multiracial in 2015, compared to just 5% in 1980, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data. That is an increase of nearly 300%.[9] ^[34]

Whites have dropped precipitously as a percentage of the US population between the 1950 and 2020 censuses. In 1950, whites were 89.3% of the population ^[35], compared to just 58% in 2020. That’s a decrease of 31.3% in less than a century.[10] ^[36]

^[37]

While skeptical of its overall value, Ryan Wade, an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois-Champaign School of Social Work, admitted to Rolling Stone that “removing ethnicity filters does implicitly promote the idea that race should not be a criteria for partner selection.”

In actual terms, what this means is that white users of most of these apps are forced to scroll through thousands of overtly sexual advertisements from partners of “diverse racial backgrounds” because of the app provides’ manipulative racial agenda.

Almost all of the most popular dating apps have expressed support for and donated to the radical anti-white Black Lives Matter movement. This includes OkCupid ^[38], Badoo ^[39], and Tinder ^[40].

^[41]

^[42]

Behavioral psychologists have already explored the implications of things like conditioning and the persuasive efficacy of advertising. Justin Lane is an Oxford University-trained artificial intelligence (AI) expert who co-founded the international data analytics company, alan. He therefore knows something about the intentionality and bias of the algorithms programmers are creating to manipulate the population:[11] ^[43]

They’re being actively manipulated in the sense that anyone who’s ever turned on a TV or a radio has been manipulated. Marketing exists to manipulate us by ensuring that the moment we need something, we’re going to need a specific brand [emphasis added]. That’s the genius of advertising. It’s just scalable to a level we’ve never imagined with the data that social media has, and the number of people engaged on a single platform.

At the same time, there’s also passive manipulation, which has to do with what a company allows on their site — how they are producing and changing, algorithmically, the information that we see.

The increasing dystopia we are witnessing where whites are being driven into persecuted minority status in our own nations is not an accident, but the direct result, in part, of nightmarish social engineering experiments conducted on us by tech oligarchs, exacerbating the effects of the open-borders agenda.

^[44]

Jason Kessler ^[45] (e-mail him ^[46]) is a journalist and civil rights activist with bylines at VDARE, Daily Caller, and GotNews, as well as his own site, JasonKessler.us ^[47]. Follow him on Telegram ^[48], Gab ^[49], and Twitter ^[50], and subscribe to his news and opinion show Happenings on Odysee ^[51] and Rumble ^[52].

* * *

Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)

For other ways to donate, click here ^[56].

Notes

[1] ^[57] John D. McKinnon, “Google Workers Discussed Tweaking Search Function to Counter Travel Ban ^[58]Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2018.

[2] ^[59] Robert Epstein, “Google Is Shifting Votes On A Massive Scale, But A Solution Is At Hand ^[60],” Daily Caller, November 6, 2022.

[3] ^[61] Lester Fabian Brathwaite, “Why Dating Apps Are Racist AF — With or Without Ethnicity Filters ^[62],” Rolling Stone, August 21, 2020.

[4] ^[63] Vikram R. Bhargava & Suneal Bedi, “OPINION: Are online dating companies swiping left on Black Lives Matter? ^[64]”, Reuters, June 13, 2020.

[5] ^[65] Ritchie King, “The uncomfortable racial preferences revealed by online dating ^[66],” by Quartz, November 20, 2013.

[6] ^[67] Conor Lynch, “Angry young white men, the ‘incel rebellion’ and an age of worldwide reaction ^[68],” Salon, May 12, 2018

[7] ^[69] Taylor Wofford, OkCupid Co-Founder: “We Experiment on Human Beings . . . That’s How Websites Work ^[70],” Newsweek, July 28, 2014.

[8] ^[71] Liz Robbins, “How Christian Rudder, a Founder of OKCupid, Spends His Sunday ^[72],” The New York Times, February 13, 2015.

[9] ^[73] Gretchen Livingston, “The rise of multiracial and multiethnic babies in the U.S. ^[74],” Pew Research Center, June 6, 2017.

[10] ^[75] Sam Levine, “US’s white population declines for first time ever, 2020 census finds ^[76],” The Guardian, August 12, 2021.

[11] ^[77] Joe Allen, “Artificial Intelligence Expert Explains How Big Tech Manipulates What You Think ^[78],” The Federalist, March 12, 2021.