Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 501 New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson
Counter-Currents RadioGreg Johnson did a new solo Ask Me Anything on the latest broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio, and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:16 On the is/ought problem in ethics
05:54 Comment on Greg’s Graduate School with Heidegger
07:01 What’s the difference between wisdom and knowledge?
13:57 Greg’s new article on “Might, Right, and Sovereignty”
29:38 On modernist elite theory vs. classical political philosophy
32:50 On the occult
34:07 On Jewish cultural power
38:31 On James Dunphy’s new article, “The Ten Scariest Things in the World”
39:02 Should women go into higher education?
41:50 If you had to, what Halloween costume would you wear?
43:09 On hatred of the working class and manual labor
46:13 Does Greg recycle?
47:12 If you had to live in a non-Western country, which would it be?
48:39 On Leftist white advocates
52:54 Listener comments
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Related
-
Plato’s Phaedo, Part I
-
Serpent’s Walk
-
June Is the Gayest Month
-
Three Episodes from the History of Racial Politics
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha Capítulo 2: Hegemonía
-
June Is the Gayest Month
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 535 Ask Me Anything
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 534 Interview with Alexander Adams
7 comments
Here’s a question for you Greg. If one of our like minded brothers were to happen to hit the latest powerball jackpot (over 1 billion) and then started donating huge amounts of money to sites like Counter Currents how long would it be before this country’s intelligence agencies framed him for a crime??
Probably never.
Greg, could we inquire, what is the largest single donation cc has received? Ever.
I believe it was $20K.
Wow!
Hard to answer in the hypothetical, but becoming a high-profile target for retaliation would almost certainly be a concern for would-be wealthy patrons.
1,000 multimillionaires would probably be of greater benefit to the movement than 1 multibillionaire for exactly this reason (larger number of targets=harder to strike out against). It’s more achievable anyway, as the US alone has millions of millionaires but only a few hundred billionaires.
If I had my neighbors kind of money, counter currents would not be doing fundraisers anymore!
to answer the question, I don’t think they’d directly attack the person, rather they would attack his or her money. That kind of money would have to be in the system somewhere. Suddenly, there would be some big financial shakeup like 2008, and the government would bail out every bank but the one where their money happened to be, like with Lehman brothers. I think that’s how they do that.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment