Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 484 New Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson
Counter-Currents Radio
157 words / 1:02:12
Greg Johnson did a new solo Ask Me Anything on the latest broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio, and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
01:52 On the universal immorality of population replacement
06:15 Do you have any updates on your court case related to your detainment in Norway?
08:14 What are your thoughts on the royal family?
27:49 What is your favorite British cuisine?
29:08 Should we propagate the idea that refugees spread disease?
30:53 Do you have any hobbies?
32:31 What European cities would you recommend for vacation, and have you been to South America?
35:54 Listener comments and commentary on white supremacy
43:02 Should we defend colonialism?
44:53 Listener comments
46:01 On the influence of Jewish people in the Republican Party
47:34 How do you red-pill people who won’t budge?
55:55 On interracial dating
58:52 On the psychology of black reproductive strategies
59:46 On interracial dating in media
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
3 comments
Americans insist upon their country being “number 1” because without a proper understanding of race and nation as biological categories, they have no other reason to love their country. When you only love your country because it is the “land of opportunity” then you will abandon it when there is better opportunity elsewhere.
I never noticed that white women who race mix tends to be overweight. Those female race mixers I know are rather good looking and sexually attractive but with not very high intelligence and dominated by primitive, animalistic instincts. These women could easily get white men but were attracted to the primitive strength they sense in Negroes and Arabs. Society and culture must encourage women to appreciate and be attracted to intelligent and civilized men otherwise their instincts will draw some of them to men of lower quality, including non-whites.
It’s true that despite all propaganda interracial relationships are relatively rare, but it still occurs, and one should also keep in mind that although few white women would mate with a completely black African there are far more who doesn’t pay attention to if someone who is 50% or 25% black. Such people looks sometimes not much darker than Southern Europeans. Thus black genes gradually gets mixed into the white gene pool.
Greg described fat women as “defective”, and I sensed some contempt in those words. To be overweight is of course not ideal but some genetic flaws is a part of nature. You can be fat and still have predominantly good and useful qualities. Not necessary to express contempt for people because of superficial flaws.
I described fat people as defective, which is not controversial, for obesity is in itself a defect. Beyond that, it is a defect that is rooted in choices and habits, which can be changed. When you see people suffering from defects that they have chosen to acquire and maintain, it is natural to look down on them. Just as they look down on themselves. As I said, my contempt for fat people is nothing compared to their own contempt for themselves, which is an added burden of fatness, beyond the fact that it is ugly and unhealthy.
Of course fat people can have other good qualities. I never denied that.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.