3,139 words
Ever since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, conspiracy theories have been the talk of the Internet. One of the most interesting phenomena in relation to the pandemic has been witnessing conspiracy theories evolve into “science,” and vice versa.
Mass confusion became so rampant that the establishment’s Department of Propaganda (i.e., Big Tech) was forced to step in and become the arbitrator of truth, establishing a non-negotiable narrative that silenced all dissenters. This resulted in an Orwellian-style censorship campaign used to combat COVID “misinformation,” which consequently divided the public into two camps: conformists and non-conformists.
Those who weren’t devout disciples of authoritarianism came to realize that this suppression of speech wasn’t actually about “misinformation,” it was about control of the narrative. Anyone could post all the “misinformation” they desired as long as it didn’t stray from groupthink standards. Even experts and their empirical data were censored if their science didn’t endorse the system’s science.
The establishment’s response to the pandemic proved to be a complete fiasco, which highlighted a level of systemic incompetency that no amount of damage control by the Department of Propaganda could possibly repair. Censorship never fixes problems; it always creates them. The whole of Western Civilization (perhaps excluding Sweden) illustrated to the world that neoliberalist leadership — a system based on emotions and feelings — is incompatible with logic and reason.
Maybe that’s what they wanted. Maybe the powers-that-be (PTB) have been coopted by accelerationists who see the West as a dying empire, and they hope to speed up the process with the intent of building back better. That would explain the blatant ineptitude of those making the decisions. Nonetheless, it’s almost impossible to analyze the last two years rationally without going down some type of conspiracy-driven rabbit hole.
One of the more popular COVID conspiracy theories has been the idea of population control. Whether it is in relation to the mRNA vaccines, the “novel” virus, or a combination of both, there are literally millions of people who believe the pandemic was a “plandemic.” In fact, according to a recent poll, one in five people think the COVID pandemic is a “depopulation tactic”:
Amid a disturbing rise in the number of conspiracy theories taking root in the US population, a new poll has found that nearly one in five people believe that the coronavirus pandemic is a “depopulation tactic”.
Conspiracy theorists cite things such as the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset plan to “build back better,” Bill Gate’s 2017 admission that vaccines are designed so governments can depopulate the world, or that the virus itself was man-made and intentionally released from a Chinese lab with the purpose of killing millions of people as references to justify their theories.
Regardless of how you feel about the pandemic and/or the conspiracy theories that surround it, there is no denying that there are powerful people who believe the Earth is overpopulated. That is essentially the underlying agenda of the “climate control” crowd. Obviously, they aren’t going to come out explicitly as depopulationists, any more than diversity advocates are going to openly endorse white genocide. But where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Anyone who believes humans are destroying the planet is going to be a de facto depopulationist to some degree.
In practical terms, the concept of depopulation is a process of implicit actions resulting in explicit changes that are factored exponentially over a period of time. Assuming the official COVID numbers are accurate, we are currently at six million deaths (80% of those having been over 65) on a planet with seven billion people. This means that 0.08% of the planet’s population died from COVID over a two-year period. Yet, during that same time period, 280 million people were born. This illustrates the mathematical complexity depopulationists are faced with. But that doesn’t necessarily invalidate the concept from a eugenics perspective.
The fear that has driven the pandemic has been the notion that nobody knows who will get a serious case of the disease. Some people get the sniffles while others are placed on a ventilator. But just because the reasoning for this isn’t known to the public (or even the “experts”) doesn’t mean that the reason isn’t known. If this virus was created in a lab — most think it was –, it could have been designed to attack a specific genetic sequence while appearing to infect people randomly, when in fact it doesn’t.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The Year America Died here.
Some naysayers might respond that if the elites wanted to implement population control measures, they could just start another world war and kill off many more millions of people. The only way that could happen is in a nuclear war, and all parties involved know that’s suicide. Technology and nuclear weapons have eliminated the possibility of large-scale ground wars. The idea that the world could just deploy armies of men on a battlefield and have them shoot at each other until 100 million die in today’s world is completely irrational. If there is ever another world war, it will be the last war. All future conflicts will remain in the realm of fourth-generation warfare, which will be technological, biological, and asymmetrical. This type of warfare will be more efficient, controllable, eco-friendly, and profitable (the world’s ten richest men doubled their wealth during the pandemic).
From an ethical point of view, it should be noted that this idea that the PTB wouldn’t release a bioweapon capable of killing millions of people on the premise that “they care about us so much” is both disingenuous and naïve. The people in a position to make these kinds of decisions are primarily comprised of two personality types: sociopaths and justifiers. These are the same people who have sacrificed the lives of hundreds of millions of young men for the “greater good” in a multitude of meaningless wars. In fact, in the twentieth century alone 123 million people died in wars. Thinning the herd of a few million “useless eaters” in order to save the planet is no different than sacrificing the lives of millions of young men for “Communism” or “democracy.”
Given this, the conspiracy theorist would then posit that when conventional warfare becomes obsolete, as it has, unconventional warfare will become conventional. After all, warfare is just a means to an end. Let’s assume that humans really are putting a huge strain on the planet’s resources and causing climate change that will inevitably become catastrophic. Combine that with the technological revolution that has transformed humans into “useless eaters”: consumers who don’t produce. If the PTB believe this to be true, are we to assume that they wouldn’t consider drastic measures? If they think the fate of the planet lies in their hands, are we to believe that these gods would sacrifice millions of lives for “freedom,” but not to save the planet?
Motive needs to be established to make an argument in a court of law. Motive is defined as “the cause that moves people to induce a certain action.” If the Earth is in an existential crisis, is there a motive to institute population control measures?
Let’s ask a few members of the elite what they think:
Stephen Hawking: “In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9% per year. If it continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder.”
Albert Einstein: “Overpopulation in various countries has become a serious threat to the health of people and a grave obstacle to any attempt to organize peace on this planet.”
Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Isaac Asimov: “Democracy cannot survive overpopulation.”
Prince Philip: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
Bill Maher: “Shouldn’t we be against procreation at this point in time? With overpopulation and the strain on the resources on this planet? Shouldn’t we reward people who don’t spawn?”
Bill Gates: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”
Doug Stanhope: “When you consider the overpopulation in this world . . . homosexuality is completely underrated in this society.”
Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals, and schools.”
Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class.”
Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”
Jacques Cousteau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die.”
Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”
Based on the above, I’ve developed the following thesis using the Hegelian Dialectic (problem, reaction, solution): The PTB have scientifically reached the conclusion that human overpopulation has placed the planet in an existential crisis. They’ve determined that if drastic population control measures aren’t enacted soon, irreparable damage to the planet and its ecosystem is inevitable. They intend to address this issue in three phases: 1. socially-engineered sterilization, 2. technological escapism, and 3. space emigration. We are in Phase 1 and are on the verge of entering Phase 2.
Socially-engineered sterilization is systemic collusion amongst establishment entities that actively promote the breakdown of the family unit in order to discourage reproduction. The primary methods used are feminism and homosexuality.
The socially-engineered sterilization aspect of the depopulation effort has already been successfully implemented. The United States’ birthrate has frequently been below replacement numbers (2.1) since 1971, and has been consistently below it since 2007. In 2020, the US hit a record low at 1.6 births per woman. The breakdown of the traditional family as the result of radical feminism is the biggest contributor to the reduction in birthrates.
With regard to homosexuality, there has been a sharp rise in those who identify as LGBTQ, particularly among millennials. According to a recent poll, 5.6% of adults identify as LGBT, up from just 3.5% in 2012. Among millennials, data suggests that 20% identify as LGBTQ, compared to 12% of Gen X and just 7% of baby boomers. Homosexuality as a cause is social, but as an effect it’s evolutionary.
The entirety of the West has not only endorsed feminism and homosexuality, but are vehemently enforcing them. People get stuck in the mud moralizing about these behaviors instead of rationally processing them. When a person is able to escape their feelings and analyze homosexuality and feminism critically, and from an evolutionary perspective, they are able to see these behaviors for what they really are: crypto-eugenics implemented by the state.
The next phase of depopulation is the one we are currently entering: technological escapism. This is the concept of replacing — or fusing — biological reality with virtual reality (VR). Like it or not, the Metaverse is the next stage in the evolution of the Internet. This technology alone will lower birthrates below one. People will simply not leave their homes anymore. All of their relationships will be virtual, and reality will become a social construct.
Companies are literally spending millions of dollars as we speak buying up “property” in the Metaverse:
CNBC reports that since Facebook made the move towards becoming Meta, prices of digital plots have gone up by as much as 500%. One company reported spending over $2.5 million USD on land in Decentraland, a metaverse based around crypto complete with its own currency where every piece of content in the game is owned, completely autonomously, by the players. Another firm revealed spending $4.3 million buying a plot of land in Atari’s The Sandbox metaverse.
Metaverses, in the current zeitgeist, refers to these niche virtual worlds which in most cases, look a lot worse than your average videogame. Celebrity appearances and shows are becoming fairly common, a bit like the Fortnite concerts, and some like Snoop Dogg and Paris Hilton even own property in these worlds. Having celebrities onboard naturally is helping to drive up the price, with the house next to Snoop’s planned mansion going for $4.3 million.
You Can buy F. Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power here.
Another suspicious circumstance surrounding the COVID pandemic is its timing. Right as this virtual reality technology is ready to be rolled out, society gets put into a perpetual state of nihilistic despair, glued to their phones in isolation. Everyone is miserable and depressed (77 million people in the US are currently on psychiatric drugs). Drug overdoses have reached all-time highs, with 93,000 people dying in 2020. Roughly 50,000 people commit suicide annually. Then, out of nowhere, this new technology appears that will allow people to escape their living hell and create a better reality in a virtual world. It seems rather convenient — but it’s probably just another weird coincidence, of course.
In a recently-published article, an Australian professor of philosophy wrote that “virtual reality is genuine reality, and we need to embrace it.” Not only that, but he wrote that virtual reality will become a safe haven from things like “environmental collapse, pandemics and nuclear wars.” He even says that living in physical reality will eventually be viewed as a type of fetish:
It is hard to imagine humans spending their lives in virtual reality when the experience amounts to waving your arms about in the middle of the lounge with a device the size of a house brick strapped to your face.
But this is where humanity is heading, says the philosopher David Chalmers, who argues for embracing the fate. Advances in technology will deliver virtual worlds that rival and then surpass the physical realm. And with limitless, convincing experiences on tap, the material world may lose its allure, he says.
“A common way of thinking about virtual realities is that they’re somehow fake realities, that what you perceive in VR isn’t real. I think that’s wrong,” he told the Guardian. “The virtual worlds we’re interacting with can be as real as our ordinary physical world. Virtual reality is genuine reality.”
But where does this leave the physical world? “In the short term we’re pretty clearly going to be based in physical reality and I certainly wouldn’t recommend abandoning it,” Chalmers says. “But in the longer term, it’s possible to imagine people spending most of their lives inside virtual reality.” The pursuit of the physical may come to seem a novelty or a fetish, he adds.
Writing in the book, he describes numerous draws that will pull people in to VR. These are worlds in which people can enjoy superhuman powers, possess other bodies, experience new sensations and explore environments with different laws of physics. With almost unlimited space, everyone can have a virtual mansion, or even a virtual planet. And if the physical world becomes dangerously degraded – by environmental collapse, nuclear war or an interminable pandemic — VR could offer a safe haven, he says.
So, for the majority of “useless eaters,” the options are going to be: a) remain single and overweight, addicted to porn and opioids, while being suicidal and on antidepressants; b) buy some property next to Snoop Dogg and Kim Kardashian in the Metaverse using worthless crypto and imagine yourself to be a handsome superhero with a private jet who gets all the chicks; or c) be an outlier.
That leads us to Phase 3: space colonization. Last year alone, investors put a record $14.5 billion into space-related stocks. That’s 50% more than was invested in 2020. Colonizing the final frontier might sound like a thing of fantasy, but it’s going to happen — and probably sooner than you think. After all, exploration and conquest are the essence of European Man.
By the time space colonies are established, we will be in the midst of the sixth extinction, and the human population will have been considerably reduced. Earth’s ecosystem will be in recovery and will become a nature reserve that the elites living in space use as a vacation resort:
Amazon Founder and space explorer Blue Origin owner Jeff Bezos, recently forecasted that Earth will soon become a “natural resort.”
According to a WION report Bezos said, this planet will soon turn into a natural resort because only a few “will be allowed to stay here in the future.”
During the annual Ignatius Forum in Washington DC, the billionaire also said, the Earth is special and “we cannot ruin it.”
Talking about Blue Origin, his new firm, Bezos explained the experts are aiming to make sure that millions of people get to not only work in space but be born and call space as their first home, as well.
Bezos also explained millions of people will move from Earth to space over time. More so, it is the vision of Blue Origin to make millions of people work in space.
For hundreds of years, he added, most, or many of the people “will be born in space.” It will be these humans’ first home. More so, they will be born in these colonies, not to mention, they will live in such colonies.
These people may visit this planet the way one would visit a national park, forecasted Bezos. He believes the space colonies in the future will have forests, wildlife, and rivers of their own, a similar Republicworld.com report said.
Describing his prediction, Bezos said this planet can support, for example, 10 billion people to a certain level. He elaborated they’d have to work quite hard to find out how to do that without degrading the Earth. Ge added the solar system can “support a trillion people.”
Even though the billionaire is relatively positive about taking humanity to space and keeping this planet for a selected few, he was uncertain about claiming who is to decide who’s staying on this planet.
It’s not a conspiracy theory when the richest man in the world is publicly telling everyone that this is what the future will look like. The only way his vision won’t become reality is if it’s impossible to achieve.
Ask yourself how many things you experience or witness every day would have been considered impossible by practically everybody a century ago. Once you do, you’ll realize there’s only one unknown variable in the equation: time.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
27 comments
It’s obvious that at least some members of the elite are thinking along these lines, or about something similar (Klaus Schwab being one who wasn’t mentioned). However, as the author points out, we don’t know yet whether these things are actually possible in reality. VR facilities vast enough to maintain most of the Earth’s population in dreamworld most of the time (which would require unheard-of amounts of electricity, by the way), as well as space colonies capable of hosting millions, are still entirely theoretical. And even if they can indeed be realized, it will be many decades or centuries before they could be built on such a scale, no matter how much money is thrown into them. It’s also entirely possible that there will be some sort of historical shift away from such a future (the majority of people might simply decide it’s not desirable, or develop new forms of living), or that the Earth’s resources will be exhausted or that there will be some other form of catastrophe before we get to that point, also. The last couple of centuries are littered with fantastic designs for the future that were eventually abandoned and seem laughable to us today; visions such as Bezos’ might very well end up on the same scrapheap as those. I certainly hope that is the case, since if it really is just a matter of time before that’s what the world will become, then it’s the best argument against having children — and against the Right’s entire worldview, for that matter — possible.
Including Pentti Linkola in a list of ‘elites’ that support depopulation is dishonest, and you know it. William Luther Pierce said in his broadcast ‘A White World’ that he would like to see the total population of North America brought down to around fifty million. Was he a globalist elite too?
The earth is overpopulated. Look at the desertification of the Sahel and tell me with a straight face that African women having seven children each isn’t a problem. This isn’t a narrative that the elites are pushing, it is something so obvious that even they can’t ignore it, so they get out in front of it and use it to push their own agenda—the Great Replacement. Instead of telling white people that we should end all foreign aid to and forbid any immigration from any country with a positive rate of population growth, they tell us that we, already reproducing at even lower than replacement levels, need to stop having so many children, while providing a release valve for the overpopulating third world through immigration. They use the idea of depopulation, which is a good one, to push policies that have the exact opposite effect, and towards a singular goal—the Great Replacement. Everything else is misdirection and a distraction.
Correct. The depopulation agenda is actually the White genocide project, with Whites being discouraged from thinking about who is being gotten rid of.
Slandering Linkola as some kind of elite on the level of Bill Gates?
Pretending depressed acerbic ‘comedian’ Doug Stanhope has as much influence as Richard Branson?
I expect better articles from Counter-Currents authors.
Life is not a Tom Clancy novel, this depopulation idea from the Rainbow Six novel is not new.
You couldn’t have put it better.
A lot articles have been written about the amount of time that teenagers are spending on social media, to the point it is replacing traditional, face to face socializing. A lot of them wake up and check social media and then check it again before they go to bed. Dating is done online and now a lot of jobs can be done online without leaving home.
I think the Coronavirus was invented not to decimate people (on the big scale), but to scare them and to make them easier to obey. This is not a weapon to kill, but a tool for the social control.
I agree. And it’s also decimating our financial system, so people don’t have the security of a solid job or being able to ‘save for the future’. And our dreams for retirement or just having a lovely two-week cruise or vacation once every 2 to 5 years –all that’s finished. As an art lover, I find it difficult to go to museums with my mask clouding my vision. Small things like that.
These ideas are interesting, though I’m not sure I buy that many elites are truly against overpopulation. At least, they desire overpopulation in the third world, but not among western, white people.
And unlike most right-wingers, I’m personally willing to put far more blame on economic conditions, “intergenerational theft,” and the loss of middle class living standards when it comes to the destruction of the nuclear family. This is true in America at least, and I consider the baby boomers responsible for this.
This isn’t to say that culture and social norms aren’t important. Radical feminism, less obviously obnoxious, is probably far more destructive than LGBTQ, since its turned an entire generation of otherwise healthy women against men and away from marriage and starting families. Only a small minority of people are truly homosexual, despite these surveys that include large numbers of heterosexuals that find it fashionable to identify as “other than straight” or have ever had deviant thoughts regarding sex and gender.
Isaac Asimov: “Democracy cannot survive overpopulation.”
And capitalism cannot survive underpopulation…
Occupy Wallstreet got into bed with the Corporations.
How? Likely by convincing them that the people currently buying their products have a 1.8ish fertility rate and thus have no long term future. If you want to sell widgets you need to raise the wealth of the the third world so that they have disposable income. Black Lives Matter, and since they do, you won’t mind bringing a few 10s of millions of them into West. They will take out your trash (most of the time), they will wipe your butt when you’re in a nursing home (most of the time), they will make your food and won’t spit in it (most of the time). They will buy Corporate widgets with the money they make from the menial jobs and government handouts. It’s a win for all involved. You will think it’s wonderful. And if you don’t, well just shut up and pay your taxes. If you do that then you will be left in peace (if you can afford a nice neighborhood) and allowed to live out your days before you die without issue.
Google “US age pyramid” and look at the images. Then Google “Africa age pyramid and look at the images. They are coming…
If the elites are trying to depopulate the world, they sure are doing a piss poor job of it. And I agree, the current economic system requires population growth to sustain itself. If they can get everyone into the metaverse, perhaps they can create a system in which economic growth is decoupled from the physical world. Of course they would still need to feed and house people but it could significantly reduce the environmental impact.
Unrelated to this thread, but I have a question for Mr. Johnson or whoever can answer questions about the Great Replacement Prize. I am interested in submitting original art for the image section of the contest, however, I am unsure if my fantastical allegory style would be considered appropriate for the contest. Are you looking for art that very directly shows the problem, or would fantasy art symbolizing it be equally appropriate? For example, a beautiful medieval art piece of white people being infiltrated by monstrous orcs/goblins?
Another fun conspiracy theory I had, and this is an original I came up with myself: wouldn’t it be fun if there was a pandemic, and a vaccine, and then get all the dissidents to believe the vaccine is dangerous? That way, only those damnable obstinate refusers who voted for Trump and don’t follow the establishment narrative will get sick and die!
If this was indeed a plan, too bad the vaccines didn’t work, and the virus wasn’t as deadly as reported.
Or the current vaccine is not for COVID but rather for a deadly virus they have yet to release. That would be a great way to kill all the problematic people. And it would also wipe out the third world since their vaccination rates are low. It would also make for a great James Bond plot.
All the people listed above talking about overpopulation are Jewish.
Some yes, some not.
Respectfully, your explanation of the conspiracy theory is incomplete. It isn’t isn’t the virus that will reduce the population. Truth be told, I seriously doubt this was much more lethal than the flu, and probably less lethal than some such as H1N1. It seems obvious the numbers of Covid have been inflated by counting “with” along with “from”.
Anyway, the theory is that the virus, and especially the propaganda dealing with the virus, was created to convince most of the world population to take the so called vaccine. That vaccine, not the virus, is what us going to reduce the world population because it will render most of the population sterile. And I must say, there is a lot of compelling evidence for that theory. Such as noted virology doctor (NOT!) Bill Gates, who famously sterilized African youth with his vaccinations, being involved.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi said that anyone who takes this vaccine is “doomed”. His words. Seems he’s a controversial figure in Germany. I don’t know what to make of him. Decide for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucharit_Bhakdi#Political_activism,_antisemitism
As Menken observed, For every complex problem there is a simple, straightforward explanation that is totally wrong. I don’t think Bill Gates was “admitting” that vaccines are designed to depopulate the world. Reader’s time would be better spent reading up on reproductive physiology than Hegel or “gotcha” clues in obscure youtube videos. For decades there has been interest in new methods of contraception, including possibly a vaccine variety directed against various human sex hormones (ex. FSH, not vaccines against viruses). However long acting contraceptives like depo-Provera are cheap enough and fairly reliable (maybe its in your drinking water). Believe me, the lady scientists continue to talk about male birth control pills, but its still much easier to block 1 egg than millions of sperm.
In the 1970’s, talk of world overpopulation was very much a topic of left wing environmentalists. But once people started noticing which continents were disproportionately contributing to population growth, the topic suddenly become racist and verboten, akin to euthanasia for undesirables. But many are looking to ‘migrate’, preferrable to a hospitable place that may give them affirmative action.
Why whites are reproducing less is complex. Conspiracy? No. There are plenty of pregnant sixteen-year-olds all around you that have managed to outwit the conspiracy despite a borderline IQ. I’d agree that the rise of feminism is a major contributor. The problem is not so much the basic tenets of feminism, equal rights, equal pay, etc., but the ladies really see it as a launching pad for expecting more than that. In the 1950s a common scenario was a man married to a less educated homemaker. The feminists generally wont flip that script and she wants her career but still be married to a man who makes more money, etc. There are exceptions, but a disparity exists. These and economic factors make having a big family harder. Plus feminists reproduce later in life. Over 100 years, if one group has a first child at age 33 and another group at 17-21, there will me more subsequent generations and population group for the earlier reproducing group – even if you assume they have 2 kids each.
While there are more LGBTQs among millennials, this alone is not enough to account for the numbers and many will revert back to hetero after their fad 20s are over (akin to women being experimentally lesbian or bi while in college).
Virtual reality at best might include means to introduce people to have real life relationships. But the internet, at large has already been part of this problem. Men and women hold out for “the one” best mate as long as possible. If a dating site has thousands of profiles, participants generally don’t pick from the middle or bottom, but remain ‘optimistic’ that maybe they can play a bit out of their league… women especially so (read up on the 80/20 rule). Evolutionarily, females giving the thumbs up/down to a male approach is where a relationship starts. With so many choices now online and so much career to accomplish, reproduction is later and smaller. The more insightful feminists do see this and want more government subsidies for child care, etc., but I doubt that will make a big dent in the problem. Compare this to Latin immigrants whose family structure looks like a 1950s American family – bigger families than whites.
Space colonization is not happening in our lifetime at any useful scale. Its important to recognize when CEOs talk up bullshit to inspire investors. A lot of such money is really going to technology for improved satellites (and the rockets to get them there), which is very profitable. If you’ve ever met someone who has worked in an Amazon warehouse, do you think a Bezos space station will be any kind of utopia? I’ll move the North Dakota first.
You can parse Gates words if you like but I was referring to this:
https://globalpossibilities.org/abortion-drugs-discovered-in-bill-gates-vaccines-secret-sterilization-program-discovered-in-africa/
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence… lacking here. Facebook and Google cannot keep whistleblowers at bay complaining about microaggressions… you seriously think this could be kept under wraps?
First, sneaking HCG into vaccines would have landed Gates in prison and made him a pariah infinitely beyond Jeff Epstein – not worth the risk especially as he is paying for the pleasure. You can’t exclude an anti-Africa employee sneaking it into vaccines further down the pipeline. But you can be aware of the spotty history of African journalism (see a number of humorous Jim Goad entries). While there has been research into an HCG vaccine to prevent pregnancy, it is preliminary and there are far better anti-fertility drugs to sneak into a vaccine. Also, depending on how its given, HCG is given as injections to IMPROVE fertility in women. Finally the reporting of the evidence, ‘testing positive for the HCG antigen’ – this is some sort of immunoassay or western blot that failed to detail its methodology. If you overload with either sample or detection antibodies, you can test falsely positive for a lot of stuff.
I think a lot of well meaning guys in a movement latch onto this stuff because of anxiety about their own reproduction… why not become a sperm donor. You can even be paid. And they will even test it and let you know if its good seed. Interestingly, these sort of operations quietly seem to have a very non-PC eugenics slant in who they want donating… If you are successful or at least in college/grad school it helps, as well as being in your 20s (men and womens gametes accumulate mutations with age).
The success of any movement depends on clear focus and avoiding silly distractions or illusions.
Absolutely the world is either overpopulated or close to being so, and catastrophically so. Whites, with their 1.2-1.8 children per woman, and this, usually in their 30s, are doing their part. If the other populations dialled their numbers down in a similar manner, we could have a future. But still, in our respective countries. We shouldn’t bring them to our countries because their fertility tends to decrease when they get here. We should make their fertility go down where they are.
No one knows what the future will look like, including Jeff Bezos. One thing we should never forget is that God can intervene anytime in the process.
There is only one conspiracy… Read Kevin MacDonald.
I was born in 1943 when the population was 2.3 billion. So, here’s the math: 2.3 + 2.3+ 2.3 = 6.9 billion. That’s a tripling in 78 years. Tripling 7 billion in 78 years would give us 21 billion in 2100. Enjoy!
The problem, as I see it, is racial. Whites are not even replacing themselves, in either North America or European countries, while the entire African continent is merrily popping out from 4 to 7 kids per woman. The entire ‘Middle East’ — i.e. Moslems — are close behind, as is India. I don’t have enough energy to look up all the Third World islands and banana republics, but it can be easily summed up by just stating the most obvious fact: the three most populous religions in the world are Catholicism/Evangelical Christianity, Islam and Hinduism. Each of these FORBID birth control.
I don’t even believe this ballyhooed ‘Virtual Reality Metaverse’ can survive the coming real reality of overpopulation.
The Biden regime will try anything to keep the dollar’s value afloat while continuing to expand the money supply, an objectively oxymoronic situation. If Covid doesn’t work, than climate change or nuclear war or you name it are definitely on the table. Is the only hope that the beast gives out through its own profligacy? Stopping it through force will inevitably result in mass catastrophe. Putin might be inclined to try—as his overtures to Latin-American American enemies indicates. China and its overwhelming might would inevitably be dragged into any war between the US and Russia. But they might be left as the last great power standing.
Technology and nuclear weapons have eliminated the possibility of large-scale ground wars.
Why? Korea, Vietnam, Iran-Iraq, Near East conflicts were large-scale ground wars enough to kill tens and hunders thousand men and women, incl. civilians. The conflicts in Syria, Lybia, African and Asian local wars are going on and eliminate SOME of the escessive population.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment