Print this post Print this post

At the Call of a False God

Martin Luther King as a saint.

Martin Luther King as a saint.

2,808 words

Several years ago I was introduced to a man whose head was covered in bandages. I asked him what happened. He explained to me that he had recently had surgery through the Veteran’s Administration to remove fragments from a Soviet-made red phosphorous mortar shell lodged in his skull. The man was too old to have served in Iraq and Afghanistan so I inquired as to where he got such a wound — I expected him to say Vietnam, but instead, he said Zaire. He’d been in the US Special Forces and was sent to central Africa as part of an anti-Communist operation to intercept weapons being sent to the African National Congress and other pro-Communist Africans then in conflict in apartheid era South Africa.

This American support for South Africa was the result of the politics of the Cold War and it turned out to be the last of the Cold War’s proxy wars. During the Angola Border War (1966–1989) South Africans and their black Native allies fought against Cubans, East Germans, Soviets, and their black Native allies in the borderlands of Angola and what was then South African-ruled Namibia. The war was notable in that the Communist Cubans fielded a large army thousands of miles from their homeland.

For American veterans of Iraq, the mine-resistant vehicles fielded by the US Army in that conflict were either based on, or modern upgrades to, the mine-resistant vehicles developed by the white South Africans during this conflict.

The South Africans waged and won a victorious campaign in the last conflict of the Cold War, but lost the wider war against Black Nationalism in Africa. The fall of white South Africa is likely often on the mind of many whites in the West especially in these trying times, where African Justice seems to prevail in America, and Europe’s stubborn and foolish rulers have allowed for an Islamic Invasion whose end result is easily predictable tragedy. Since the end of Apartheid, South African art and literature has developed a voice of its own, a voice that tells a cutting truth about the rising tide of color and the disaster of whites yielding power to non-whites.

One such artistic work is the Christopher-Lee dos Santos’ film At Thy Call. This is a movie which tells the tragedy of South Africa — and indeed for the whole white world — in a clear, chilling way. The movie is told by a flashback, and starts with a wounded African SWAPO soldier is surrounded by South African troops, the soldier is terrified and likely to be shot on the spot. The movie then has a jump cut so naturally, the audience is left with a tension. What will happen to the cowering, wounded Negro?

The jump cut takes the audience to the the training of the white South African soldiers. The characters are introduced while standing in platoon formation. The men have just graduated basic training and are now starting advanced infantry training. The trainers of these newly inducted men are Corporal Van Tonder (Flight Sergeant Frikkie Geyser) and Corporal Pienaar (Corporal D. Clark). Both Clark and Geyser were veterans of the SADF and their mannerisms give a realistic feel to that of an NCO addressing new troops. Here one sees one of the problems of white rule in Africa — and indeed, white rule everywhere. Typically, the most dangerous enemy a white will ever face is another white. The enemy, in this case is Nick Smith (Ryan Dittman), an English South African who is antagonistic to the Afrikaner leadership and Afrikaner soldiers in his platoon. We learn that Smith has spent some time in “the DB” or Disciplinary Barracks. He is slack in training and a drain on his young fellow trainee squad leader, Danie Joubert (H. O. Meyer).

The English, as a people, are normally excellent soldiers, but in the South African circumstance it is entirely possible that there would be some antagonism between the English and Afrikaners that won’t bring about the best in non-cooperative, marginal types. A look at internet message boards related to the South African Defense Force of the time implies that there was antagonism ranging from light, American-style ribbing between Northerners and Southerners to more serious conflicts. Some English SADF veterans seemed to have been thoroughly demoralized by the Afrikaners during their National Service.

Sometimes the smallest differences are the hardest to bridge. This Afrikaner and English antagonism grew out of the histories of the British and Dutch Empires. These great rivals were very similar in that they were a racially closely-related people from Northwest Europe who were commercial, Protestant, seafaring powers. They were also comfortable with large, complex financial institutions such as stock markets and central banks. The British gained the colony of South Africa from the Dutch after the Napoleonic Wars and immediately antagonized many of the native Afrikaners by freeing slaves without compensation for their owners unlike British emancipation compensation in the West Indies. This bad start led to a cycle of dysfunction between South Africa’s two white tribes.

During the Boer War (1899 to 1902) the British Army, often employing English South Africans from Natal and the Cape Colony had interred Afrikaner families in concentration camps where many died from disease. South Africa continued on in the British Empire for the better half of the 20th century, but left the Commonwealth in 1961, enraging many of the English — especially in Natal. The movie contains is a reference to the Battle of Cassinga, which took place in May 1978 so one can presume that the timeframe of the story is occurring sometime around 1980–1985. Therefore, the Afrikaners in the movie’s timeframe could have easily grown up hearing firsthand accounts from their elders of being captured and interred by the British, and the English could very easily remember the sting of leaving the Commonwealth.

The Afrikaners and English could have gotten along especially in the face of the black threat. After all, the Dutch of New York’s Hudson River Valley did blend into the larger American English culture in the face of the French and Indian threat during colonial times.[1] However, the English of South Africa were influenced by a vast religious movement — a heresy really — which has as of yet, no name.[2]

Today, the Communism that the South Africans so valiantly fought is gone, other than a few isolated holdouts. There is also no likelihood that Communism will ever again arise. However, the black liberation movement that the South Africans were also fighting in the 1980s has a religious aspect to it and continues to exist today. Whenever a group of blacks in the #BlackLivesMatter movement force a university official to resign after apologizing for some imagined racial slight, one sees this religious heresy on display. Despite the appearance of black strength, the real force for this religious mysticism is internalized in the soul of whites. As long as this religion continues, one will need to put up with African mischief throughout white civilization.

One example of this religion in action is the French existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1908–1980). He was famously anti-religious in a traditional sense, but his preface to Frantz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth is filled with the language of venomous Abrahamic righteousness. A quote from Sartre with my comments follows:

. . . irrepressible [Third World, non-white] violence is neither sound and fury, nor the resurrection of savage instincts, nor even the effect of resentment: it is man re-creating himself.” [Is that being Born Again?] . . . to shoot down a European is to kill two birds with one stone, to destroy an oppressor and the man he oppresses at the same time. . . [Is this smiting the sinners?] When [tribal divisions] remain — as in the Congo — it’s because they are kept up by the agents of colonialism. [Is this because of witchcraft?][3]

Sartre’s writings were the cutting edge of this large religious movement that has elevated blacks to be a sort of god. Indeed, much of the anti-white activity in South Africa was led by religious leaders. Trevor Huddleston (1913–1998) and Graham Charles Chadwick (1923–2007) were both Anglican priests who campaigned against South Africa and Apartheid. Of course, neither chose to say there after Apartheid ended. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s religious organizations across the white world worked against South Africa’s apartheid system and, ultimately against South Africa’s whites.[4][5]

Below are several images which clearly show the religious aspect to this white worship of blacks.

This photograph shows the religious heresy which rules the moral consciousness of many whites. It shows Travon Martin in the place of Jesus’ Manger in a nativity scene. The original caption follows:

This photograph shows the religious heresy which rules the moral consciousness of many whites. It shows Travon Martin in the place of Jesus’ Manger in a nativity scene. The original caption follows: “Rev. Dan Lewis stands by a Nativity scene at Claremont United Methodist Church featuring a depiction of Trayvon Martin. Artist John Zachary sought to draw attention to gun violence.” (Irfan Khan, Los Angeles Times, December 28, 2013)

Made into saints: The memorial to the four girls bombed in the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing.

Made into saints: The memorial to the four girls bombed in the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing.

Martin Luther King as a saint.

Martin Luther King as a saint.

An example of how this sort of white religious support for black endeavors baffled many of the white rulers in Africa. In Portuguese Angola, the colonial authorities had neglected military development in the colony as it had been peaceful for centuries. After five centuries of light rule, the Portuguese government was shocked by the outbreak of vicious hostility in 1961. Portuguese, “Brigadier Martins Soares was candid about his country’s shortcomings and the effect these ultimately had in fostering revolt”:

We’d become accustomed to years of unopposed rule. We also presupposed that when the troubles came, those indigenes in our sphere of influence would rally with us and we’d counter the menace together. After all, we’d ruled effectively for god knows how many generations, though we didn’t take into account how the world had changed after World War II.[6]

The English in South Africa were completely influenced by the Zeitgeist of Negro Worship infecting the rest of the white world. During the Whites Only vote in 1992 where the South African administration of F. W. de Klerk asked South Africa’s whites if he should continue on with his reforms that would eventually lead to black rule, 96% of the English voted that he should continue, while only 46% of the Afrikaners voted yes.[7]

In her book about the end of white South Africa Ilana Mercer wrote of the Protestant failure of will to deal with the aforementioned race-unrealist religion that has taken hold of so many white seekers of moral justice. “The tragedy of the Afrikaner and the American — a function of a shared Calvinist-Puritan ancestry — is the struggle to reconcile Pietism with power: The basic dilemma of Western man is how to reconcile power with justice.”[8] In a later passage she writes that “. . . the ‘exceedingly tough’ Puritan mind was crippled by a correspondingly “tender conscience.”[9]

Thus, within the Corporal Pienaar’s 1980s era SADF infantry training platoon consisting of one malcontent English and many other worried Afrikaner conscripts, the religious-like support for blacks comes to a head when the Corporal attempts to explain, exactly why his men are being sent to the Angola border to fight.

“Many South African soldiers, have stood here proudly, where you now stand. Their pride and history, is in your blood and in your hands. You will be a part of that history.”

The corporal orders the men to hold out their arms.

“The color of your hands, it is your privilege, and that is what this war is about.”

When Corporal Pienaar orders a black worker standing submissively near the platoon to “Fuck off,” Nick Smith attacks the Corporal from the back of formation, knocking to the ground.

“Just back off Danie!” shouts Smith to his mate attempting to stop Smith’s attack, “he’s a human being too, just open your eyes.” Smith is subdued by the other members of the platoon. The black who Smith is defending does nothing to help Smith and remains as passive through the affair.

The fight is illustrative of the lack of the South African, and indeed all civilizationaly competent whites who must effectively manage, civilizationaly incompetent non-whites, especially black Africans, to provide for a moral defense of their power. Admittedly, it is beyond the job description of a non-commissioned officer to formulate a moral response for white defense of their rule. However, in America, university presidents under threat from black sit-ins and other disturbances, are perfectly seated to use the endowments under their control to do so.

Communism is gone, at least in part by the fact that anti-Communist intellectuals were able to shrink Communism’s appeal by pointing out the irrational religious aspects of the movement.[10]


Communists giving their particular salute during the Spanish Civil War. In the 1930s the best and brightest idealists across the European World went to Spain to fight for their ideals . . .

. . . but by 1989, Communism was clearly grey and cold. The illogical portions of its religious idealism had become apparent to all. The religious fire was out. The purpose of the wire and wall was to keep people in the Communist system, not keep others from getting in.

. . . but by 1989, Communism was clearly grey and cold. The illogical portions of its religious idealism had become apparent to all. The religious fire was out. The purpose of the wire and wall was to keep people in the Communist system, not keep others from getting in.

Religious-style movements, especially ones such as Communism without “a god” at its center are ultimately weak ideologies, although for a time these ideologies can grip the minds of intelligent people and fill them with intense devotion. Religious-style movements suffer from the problem that they must put in a new “god” in the philosophical location which was formerly held by the Deity and that new “god” will eventually be shown to be a ridiculous fraud. In order to function, a religion must be able to allow for its adherents to continue on with their faith in things unseen, the future kingdom coming, as the members’ strive for individual piety. One cannot prove that God doesn’t exist, but eventually one can prove that the material prosperity promised by Communism is not existent, and the kingdom is not ever coming. Pious individual support for something like the Soviet System eventually proves to be demoralizing.

For now though, and certainly in 1980 South Africa, the worship of the African remains a solid religion. Private Danie Jobert is influenced by the new religion. Following the fight over the African between the Corporal Pienaar and Nick Smith movie narrative of the movie returns to minutes prior to the opening scene. Danie Jobert and his squad are conducting operations in the bush of Southwest Africa. The men are “clearing” an objective, looking for intelligence from the bodies of the fallen enemies. One enemy escapes, and ends up being wounded. Now the true poison of Nick Smith’s religious devotion to the Africans comes to damage the white South African Soldiers. The men surround the cowering, wounded Negro and Danie Jobert betrays his comrades by interfering with their ability to take him prisoner or shoot him. In his moral signaling Jobert ends up getting another soldier killed. The movie’s end is a damning indictment of the religion of African worship.


1. There nothing quite like a massacre in a Race War to help whites bury their internal differences. The Dutch and English in 1600s North America had an immediate Indian Threat that eventually made families such as the Roosevelts into exemplars of Anglo-Saxonism.

2. When I wrote the first draft of this article there was no name, but one appeared shortly thereafter – blackism.,%20t

3. One can read all of Sartre’s preface at the following link.



6. Al Venter, in his book Portugal’s Guerrilla Wars in Africa: Lisbon’s Three Wars in Angola, Mozambique and Portuguese Guinea 1961–1974 quoted one anti-Portuguese fighter who, “admitted that most of his early support came from the American Committee on Africa and the Ford Foundation, largely as the result of the efforts of the late Eleanor Roosevelt and the former Under Secretary of State Mennen Williams.” (Kindle Location 2329).

7. Kemp, Arthur, The Lie of Apartheid and other True Stories form Southern Africa, Ostara Publications, 2012, Kindle Location 481.

8. Mercer, Ilana, Into the Cammibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa, A Curva Peligrosa Book, Stairway Press, Seattle 2011, p. 207/

9. Ibid., p. 208.

10. A large plurality of philosophers, thinkers, and writers representing different school of thought agreed that Communism was a Christian Heresy. Historian Arnold Toynbee famously said so here, He was not alone, arch-Catholic Hilaire Belloc also mentioned the same in his book The Great Heresies Calvinist Philosopher Francis Schaeffer explicitly said Communism was so powerful because of its religious impulses in his movie How Should We Then Live, for the exact quote go to here: (13:19). In 1988, after the Chernobyl disaster laid bare the crumbling foundation of the Soviet’s Communism Pat Buchanan wrote, “How do we explain this continuing suspension of disbelief, despite the manifest crimes of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Col. Mengistu and Pol Pot? The answer, I think does not lie in a lack of knowledge about the Communist record, but, rather, in the presence of a form of religious belief.”



  1. nineofclubs
    Posted June 9, 2016 at 4:07 am | Permalink

    More recently the US opposition to communism in Afghanistan directly assisted the mujahideen; including Islamist fundamentalists. Ditto the efforts to remove Saddam (‘socialist’ Ba’ath Party). Ditto removing Gaddafi for being less than enamoured with corporate capitalism.
    Fighting communism inveigled Western nations in foolish conflicts that served none but the international money power.

  2. Posted June 9, 2016 at 4:18 am | Permalink

    This vast religious movement—this strange heresy— is nothing new. Revilo Oliver in his ” What We Owe Our Parasites”, noted “The deeper, more important and far more unpleasant question is: What was wrong with the American people that makes them and is still making them willing victims of their enemies?” Oliver states after reading the ranting of the abolitionist that they weren’t motivated by do-gooding for Blacks nearly as much as they were motivated by do-gooding against Whites. He felt that the abolitionist’s motive was passionate envy against the superior qualities of the White southern aristocracy. Oliver called this weird mythology, Liberalism, which is an inversion of values. Helmut Schoeck in his “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior”,believed that envy avoidance(fear of other’s envy of us) is why we go along with this masochism or more accurately that the lack of courage to ignore the envier and a guilty conscience for being envied and making others sin is what is wrong with us.

  3. inspector general
    Posted June 9, 2016 at 5:53 am | Permalink

    Fascinating and well-informed. The religion of “blackism” (as the ultimate target of compassion for the “other”) is indeed a major stream feeding the muddy river of contemporary social life in the West.

    I wonder if you were merely being tactful or genuinely do not know or accept the indispensable Tribal contributions the central banks and “East India Companies” of both England and Holland. You say, “They were also comfortable with large, complex financial institutions such as stock markets and central banks.” as if this is a feature of the landscape, overlooking the work of erosion that has made the landscape what it is…

  4. Abc
    Posted June 9, 2016 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    Man needs hope that he is doing something meaningful. One’s life can’t disappear, here today, gone tomorrow. Gone without a trace. This is impossible to accept emotionally.

    Christianity: One lives eternally. Obviously, problem solved.

    But there are other solutions: Tribalism. One might die, but one’s tribe lives on. And hence one “imprints” oneself into the future after one’s death. This is one of the allures of Judaism (for Jews) and for some on the alt-right, even.

    Worship or veneration of one’s family’s ancestors (I’m thinking of the Chinese) can do the trick. One becomes the ancestor after death.

    Nature worship: This also does the trick, although since the bomb nature doesn’t seem quite as permanent as it doubtlessly once did.

    In the case of liberals: What gives them hope is imprinting oneself into a tomorrow that little by little (or, preferably, all at once) will turn into a utopia. Up, up, and away world. One dies but the beautiful world society one has been part of lives on; one is imprinted onto something meaningful (as opposed to merely a world which muddles by, perhaps often near the verge of an out-of-control catastrophe).

    But what would be required to have an upward-trajectory world? On a basic level, political stability and peace. What would be required for that? No group-level identity conflicts. Because everyone knows these cannot be resolved–almost ever.

    No group-level identity conflicts means all groups must be equal. A group on the bottom is thus lionized to make the situation fit their ideology.

    Ever bowl? Did you ever “push” your bowling ball away from a certain trajectory–after it left your hands?

    Everyone’s looking for meaning/permanence/enduring value.

  5. R_Moreland
    Posted June 10, 2016 at 4:17 am | Permalink

    I was in Southwest Africa back during the 1980s as a tourist. On occasion I’d have to drive my rental car to the side of the road as a column of those mine resistant vehicles rumbled north towards the Angolan border. Aside from that, there was little sign of a war in progress, at least as far north as Walvis Bay and Windhoek. I stopped once to help a (White) woman who had a flat tire and she was packing a pistol; but then again, you might have seen the same in any number of states back in the USA.

    One interesting thing is that the South African government did not publicize the participation of the SADF and SWATF in the Angolan civil war. This was for assorted political reasons, even when it came to large battles such as those in the 1987-88 Cuito Cuanavale campaign. Of course, the communists had no hesitation in making agitprop out of the war in Angola; but for Westerners, you had to read Soldier of Fortune to get an idea as to what was going on.

    This goes back to the basic problem with the White side in the last wave of colonial wars (Portuguese Africa, Rhodesia, SW Africa): a lack of effective agitprop on the international stage. White governments maintained military control in both SW Africa and Rhodesia until the end; and the Portuguese in Angola implemented a fairly successful counterinsurgency until the home government in Lisbon collapsed in 1974. But the Black insurgents held the strategic advantage of an international agitprop apparatus organized by communist fronts as well as capitalist–the latter being in church and corporate foundations with their Orwellians about “liberation” and “majority” rule, screening the reality of insurgent terrorism, one-party African dictatorships and tribal bloodbaths.

    (I wonder how many of those liberal and leftist anti-apartheid/anti-colonial activists have in recent years seen Africans and other third worlders rampage through their cities and sexually assault their children? Do they ever wake up to the reality of their betrayal of White civilization?)

    Anyway, I later became involved in a private initiative to support White ruled South Africa against the movement to impose sanctions over apartheid. The central difficulty was in developing a political line. The two basic themes popular among American conservatives were: (1) anti-communism; and (2) saving South African mineral resources for the fight against the USSR. But few people were willing to stand up and state that the reason we needed to support South Africa was because White people have an interest in standing together. Even in those days a pro-White political line was anathema to conservatives. The best line one could develop was that South Africa was part of the Western world and all Western nations had to stick together. It was this lack of an effective political line which eventually doomed our efforts.

    Africans, of course, never had this problem. They saw all these wars as part of a greater struggle of Black against White Civilization and understood the value of solidarity among Africans. They also, in practice, had little use for one-man-one vote and the rest of the slogans which entranced liberals in Europe and America. To Africans what counted was power. Would that Whites understood the same!

    In the end, White South Africa handed over the power, as Whites had been doing since Harold Macmillan’s 1960 Winds of Change Speech. The results have been largely disastrous. Rhodesia’s Ian Smith summed it all up: “I told you so.”

    Of course, the situation of Whites in South Africa, Rhodesia and the Portuguese colonies is a microcosm of Whites everywhere: White peoples are a minority facing the hordes of the third world, with the latest phase of the struggle taking place in the “refugee” invasions of Europe and North America. This is why the fight of South Africa then is our fight today.

    I’ll note that in recent years numerous books and websites have arisen from South Africans and others about the Border War. There are plenty of good lessons for White soldiers in any future conflict. And next time around, let’s get the agitprop apparatus into action so we can win on the strategic front.

  6. ex South African
    Posted June 12, 2016 at 5:32 am | Permalink

    “The South Africans waged and won a victorious campaign in the last conflict of the Cold War, but lost the wider war against Black Nationalism in Africa.”

    Much of more correct truth is hidden away in the Afrikaans language, not accessible for most people.

    An elite soldier (article in English) ,now old and poor, laments (the people on this website know the truth from the military perspective, all veterans):

    At the end of the day South Africa was sold out by certain spineless members of its own elite, ignoring advice by the South African security forces. So the statement “…lost the wider war against Black Nationalism” is not entirely true. There exists no coherent single document which covers this relative recent historical event, for we are still in the midst of this final chapter of South Africa, and many people are still covering their backsides, trying to justify their traitorous and spineless actions.

    The Bush War was as good as won, but all the gains were given away by the politicians: Rhodesia, Southwest-Africa (UN Resulotion 435), South Africa (National Party).

    These people will still know the truth:

    So will Dr. Louis Bothma:


    ex 1 SSB SADF serviceman in the late 1970’s and beyond

    • ex South African
      Posted June 15, 2016 at 7:20 am | Permalink

      An introduction – the sell-out by the Afrikaner elite, who saw it coming and saw to it that they will not be part of the Boers, who would become the fall guys of the international capitalists, and saw to it that they will not loose out in the process, but ride the wave toward fame and wealth and influence. Here and there some little inaccuracies, but it paints a picture like I experienced it:

      For the ideological context of this documentary – I found it here (private civil preppers):

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    Here’s the Thing

    Trevor Lynch: Part Four of the Trilogy

    Graduate School with Heidegger

    It’s Okay to Be White


    The Enemy of Europe

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace