Dylann Roof’s Manifesto
The following text purports to be Dylann Roof’s 2,440 word “manifesto” from the website lastrhodesian.com. It was saved under the name “rtf88.txt.” I am reprinting it unaltered, typos and all. It seems unlikely that this manifesto is fake, since Roof is alive and could expose it if it were.
It turns out that Roof is a White Nationalist, aware of the racial and Jewish problems. He makes it clear that he was awakened by the Trayvon Martin affair. I imagine many people were, because calling George Zimmerman a white man — and sticking to it — is the most elegant proof possible that the establishment wishes to whip up black hatred against whites by creating the utterly false impression that blacks are disproportionately the victims rather than the perpetrators of interracial hate crimes.
The media had to consciously lie to sell that story, right down to editing the tape of Zimmerman’s 911 call. And they knew that, by triggering resentful and impulsive blacks, whites blood would flow. They considered that justice. And they also knew that black blood would flow when police showed up on the scene. But they considered that acceptable collateral damage. They also knew — indeed, they hoped — that whites would strike back, further polarizing the races. It took a while, but Dylann Roof did just that. It was a predictable and desired consequence of the Trayvon Martin operation, which was the template for subsequent black agitation in Ferguson, New York City, Baltimore, and eventually everywhere there are blacks who run afoul of the law. So I blame the Left.
It goes without saying that choosing to shoot 9 people at a Bible study in Charleston was a stupid and evil. It is a shame that when journalists lie, other people die. (James Foley being an exception.) But maybe Roof’s choice of target was not random. It will be interesting to see if that particular church, with its long history of civil rights agitation, played a role in the Trayvon Martin op as well.
The whole world will soon be reading this manifesto, and the establishment will respond with predictable lies, distortions, evasions, and emotional blackmail. Thus I am issuing a crowdsourcing appeal to our readers. In the comments below, please post links to reputable sources for every documentable factual claim that Roof makes in his manifesto. I will then choose the best of them and issue an annotated version.
I was not raised in a racist home or environment. Living in the South, almost every White person has a small amount of racial awareness, simply beause of the numbers of negroes in this part of the country. But it is a superficial awareness. Growing up, in school, the White and black kids would make racial jokes toward each other, but all they were were jokes. Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.
The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?
From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries. Again I found myself in disbelief. As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there. From here I found out about the Jewish problem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.
I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have the most real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans.
Niggers are stupid and violent. At the same time they have the capacity to be very slick. Black people view everything through a racial lense. Thats what racial awareness is, its viewing everything that happens through a racial lense. They are always thinking about the fact that they are black. This is part of the reason they get offended so easily, and think that some thing are intended to be racist towards them, even when a White person wouldnt be thinking about race. The other reason is the Jewish agitation of the black race.
Black people are racially aware almost from birth, but White people on average dont think about race in their daily lives. And this is our problem. We need to and have to.
Say you were to witness a dog being beat by a man. You are almost surely going to feel very sorry for that dog. But then say you were to witness a dog biting a man. You will most likely not feel the same pity you felt for the dog for the man. Why? Because dogs are lower than men.
This same analogy applies to black and White relations. Even today, blacks are subconsciously viewed by White people are lower beings. They are held to a lower standard in general. This is why they are able to get away with things like obnoxious behavior in public. Because it is expected of them.
Modern history classes instill a subconscious White superiority complex in Whites and an inferiority complex in blacks. This White superiority complex that comes from learning of how we dominated other peoples is also part of the problem I have just mentioned. But of course I dont deny that we are in fact superior.
I wish with a passion that niggers were treated terribly throughout history by Whites, that every White person had an ancestor who owned slaves, that segregation was an evil an oppressive institution, and so on. Because if it was all it true, it would make it so much easier for me to accept our current situation. But it isnt true. None of it is. We are told to accept what is happening to us because of ancestors wrong doing, but it is all based on historical lies, exaggerations and myths. I have tried endlessly to think of reasons we deserve this, and I have only came back more irritated because there are no reasons.
Only a fourth to a third of people in the South owned even one slave. Yet every White person is treated as if they had a slave owning ancestor. This applies to in the states where slavery never existed, as well as people whose families immigrated after slavery was abolished. I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive. One sticks out in my mind where an old ex-slave recounted how the day his mistress died was one of the saddest days of his life. And in many of these narratives the slaves told of how their masters didnt even allowing whipping on his plantation.
Segregation was not a bad thing. It was a defensive measure. Segregation did not exist to hold back negroes. It existed to protect us from them. And I mean that in multiple ways. Not only did it protect us from having to interact with them, and from being physically harmed by them, but it protected us from being brought down to their level. Integration has done nothing but bring Whites down to level of brute animals. The best example of this is obviously our school system.
Now White parents are forced to move to the suburbs to send their children to “good schools”. But what constitutes a “good school”? The fact is that how good a school is considered directly corresponds to how White it is. I hate with a passion the whole idea of the suburbs. To me it represents nothing but scared White people running. Running because they are too weak, scared, and brainwashed to fight. Why should we have to flee the cities we created for the security of the suburbs? Why are the suburbs secure in the first place? Because they are White. The pathetic part is that these White people dont even admit to themselves why they are moving. They tell themselves it is for better schools or simply to live in a nicer neighborhood. But it is honestly just a way to escape niggers and other minorities.
But what about the White people that are left behind? What about the White children who, because of school zoning laws, are forced to go to a school that is 90 percent black? Do we really think that that White kid will be able to go one day without being picked on for being White, or called a “white boy”? And who is fighting for him? Who is fighting for these White people forced by economic circumstances to live among negroes? No one, but someone has to.
Here I would also like to touch on the idea of a Norhtwest Front. I think this idea is beyond stupid. Why should I for example, give up the beauty and history of my state to go to the Norhthwest? To me the whole idea just parralells the concept of White people running to the suburbs. The whole idea is pathetic and just another way to run from the problem without facing it.
Some people feel as though the South is beyond saving, that we have too many blacks here. To this I say look at history. The South had a higher ratio of blacks when we were holding them as slaves. Look at South Africa, and how such a small minority held the black in apartheid for years and years. Speaking of South Africa, if anyone thinks that think will eventually just change for the better, consider how in South Africa they have affirmative action for the black population that makes up 80 percent of the population.
It is far from being too late for America or Europe. I believe that even if we made up only 30 percent of the population we could take it back completely. But by no means should we wait any longer to take drastic action.
Anyone who thinks that White and black people look as different as we do on the outside, but are somehow magically the same on the inside, is delusional. How could our faces, skin, hair, and body structure all be different, but our brains be exactly the same? This is the nonsense we are led to believe.
Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior. If a scientist publishes a paper on the differences between the races in Western Europe or Americans, he can expect to lose his job. There are personality traits within human families, and within different breeds of cats or dogs, so why not within the races?
A horse and a donkey can breed and make a mule, but they are still two completely different animals. Just because we can breed with the other races doesnt make us the same.
In a modern history class it is always emphasized that, when talking about “bad” things Whites have done in history, they were White. But when we lern about the numerous, almost countless wonderful things Whites have done, it is never pointed out that these people were White. Yet when we learn about anything important done by a black person in history, it is always pointed out repeatedly that they were black. For example when we learn about how George Washington carver was the first nigger smart enough to open a peanut.
On another subject I want to say this. Many White people feel as though they dont have a unique culture. The reason for this is that White culture is world culture. I dont mean that our culture is made up of other cultures, I mean that our culture has been adopted by everyone in the world. This makes us feel as though our culture isnt special or unique. Say for example that every business man in the world wore a kimono, that every skyscraper was in the shape of a pagoda, that every door was a sliding one, and that everyone ate every meal with chopsticks. This would probably make a Japanese man feel as though he had no unique traditional culture.
I have noticed a great disdain for race mixing White women within the White nationalists community, bordering on insanity it. These women are victims, and they can be saved. Stop.
Unlike many White naitonalists, I am of the opinion that the majority of American and European jews are White. In my opinion the issues with jews is not their blood, but their identity. I think that if we could somehow destroy the jewish identity, then they wouldnt cause much of a problem. The problem is that Jews look White, and in many cases are White, yet they see themselves as minorities. Just like niggers, most jews are always thinking about the fact that they are jewish. The other issue is that they network. If we could somehow turn every jew blue for 24 hours, I think there would be a mass awakening, because people would be able to see plainly what is going on.
I dont pretend to understand why jews do what they do. They are enigma.
Hispanics are obviously a huge problem for Americans. But there are good hispanics and bad hispanics. I remember while watching hispanic television stations, the shows and even the commercials were more White than our own. They have respect for White beauty, and a good portion of hispanics are White. It is a well known fact that White hispanics make up the elite of most hispanics countries. There is good White blood worht saving in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and even Brasil.
But they are still our enemies.
I have great respent for the East Asian races. Even if we were to go extinct they could carry something on. They are by nature very racist and could be great allies of the White race. I am not opposed at all to allies with the Northeast Asian races.
I hate the sight of the American flag. Modern American patriotism is an absolute joke. People pretending like they have something to be proud while White people are being murdered daily in the streets. Many veterans believe we owe them something for “protecting our way of life” or “protecting our freedom”. But im not sure what way of life they are talking about. How about we protect the White race and stop fighting for the jews. I will say this though, I myself would have rather lived in 1940’s American than Nazi Germany, and no this is not ignorance speaking, it is just my opinion. So I dont blame the veterans of any wars up until after Vietnam, because at least they had an American to be proud of and fight for.
To take a saying from a film, “I see all this stuff going on, and I dont see anyone doing anything about it. And it pisses me off.”. To take a saying from my favorite film, “Even if my life is worth less than a speck of dirt, I want to use it for the good of society.”.
I have no choice. I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.
Unfortunately at the time of writing I am in a great hurry and some of my best thoughts, actually many of them have been to be left out and lost forever. But I believe enough great White minds are out there already.
Please forgive any typos, I didnt have time to check it.
Revolution with Full Benefits
Enoch Powell, poslední tory
An Open Letter to Scott Adams
New Video! Why Do White Nationalists Sabotage Their Own Movement?
White Fragility & The White Nationalist Manifesto: A Comparative Analysis
New Video! “American” Is an Ethnicity!
PUA vs. White Nationalist Perspectives on Mating
Against White Unionism
In an earlier comment I said we need writers and thinkers not assassins. Having read his statement I see that Dylann Roof was an instinctive writer – what a pity that he wasted his talent.
Yes, we need even more writers and “thinkers”. The alien elites will read our essays, like them, and let us have our own country.
The aim of the “alien elite” is to control the world, with all kinds of people under their rule. So you really think they’ll allow us Whites to have our space?
I think we need some more writers, but only if they are good writers. Both academics and writers who can reach more broad audiences.
But we more than anything need more organizers and leaders willing to show their faces publicly. People who are willing to risk their reputation and social status, in order to attain political goals. The alternative right being stuck as a mainly fringe internet phenomena will accomplish little.
But there are some encouraging signs in Europe. Political grassroots groups are organizing, and it looks like CC and other metapolitical groups have had some influence on this development.
But I agree that lone wolf assasins like Roof or the notorious Breivik will accomplish little.
You are the first person I have come across whose thoughts about Dylann are similar to my own. “…instinctive writer.” He most certainly is. He is a 21 y/o kid who has not attended a university and has not completed high school. Yet the intellectual potential is there in this sincere and raw manifesto. He is a diamond in the rough, in my opinion. Had he had a more advantaged situation and circumstance minus the alcohol and drugs, he could have developed his thoughts and contributed something really worthwhile. Maybe he can still accomplish that if he does not get the death penalty. I will look forward to reading the world wide comments on young Dylann’s thoughts. My heart goes out to this kid. I believe something good will eventually come from his writing,
This is so sad. He knew what was going on. He is very articulate. That he thought it was up to him to save the white race is so very white. His inner turmoil must have been huge. This is why white men need to bond together, instead of being rugged individuals or chasing skirts. All for one and one for all is better than I can do this myself. This kind of isolation will kill off our men one by one. He is a new kind of lone wolf. He needed a pack. And where are the Christians who will call him son? The ones I checked are busy distancing themselves.
If I had a son, he would look like Dylann Roof.
I hope you are not being facetious. I am pretty sure Obama was, as in a semantic game.
No, although no son of mine would have that haircut.
Greg, According to this site most of these young shooters had the same haircut http://www.naturalnews.com/050138_mass_shootings_bowl_cuts_hair_styles.html which would explain the wild lost look in their eyes.
This is dreadful, Greg. You are one of the people who predicted this unravelling. It will come to the UK soon, unless we push back against our elites, who are fomenting this.
This is no crazed rant. Just a white kid who sees what happens to our people on a daily basis. Too bad kids like him have nowhere to turn in their frustration. Where is our NAACP?
Fine, these are insights and experiences many normal people have. And now smeared by the taint of another useless mass murder. Congratulations! Sometimes I really believe the Devil himself is against us…
If the devil is against us, then God is on our side. After all Yahweh was not exactly opposed to the murder of his son.
Reading the manifesto, seeing the corresponding image of him looking down, thinking about the gruesome fate that now awaits this young White man, against the backdrop of our state as a People, I nearly teared up at the colossal tragedy of it all.
Despite his counterproductive methods this was clearly a well-meaning young Man, with good, sound instincts, but without proper leadership, willing to sacrifice for a People who’d despise him because of it.
Let this tragedy light a fire under our backsides to urgently create productive outlets for White boys, girls, men & women to effectively fight for our People in a meaningful way, besides just talking – as has been alluded to in some comments on a related article.
The antiwhite establishment caused Dylann to snap. I am very saddened that he threw his life away and I am very sad that that the fall of segregation has resulted in tensions between whites and blacks, tensions which have resulted in there having been tragedies experienced by both whites and blacks.
Ultimately I blame the system and its collaborators for what has happened. And it is heartbreaking to see the barrage of hatred directed at Dylann who was simply a victim of the system. My sympathies also go out to the black families who have suffered losses as well. This incident demonstrates that we need to reinstate segregation for the sake of both whites and blacks.
Just like Breivik, Roof appears to be intelligent and well informed. But just like Breivik he committed an act that is as immoral as it is counterproductive.
This young man should have gone into (local) politics, or at least into activism, such as Angelo Gage is doing.
There are still constructive avenues to channel frustration into, but lone wolf terrorism is not one of them.
I think you SHOULD go visit him in jail and tell him that.
This event may result in making it harder for the right in Europe to address the African immigration problem
Reminds me of Breivik in a way, though this kid is closer to the money. He acknowldges the JQ but then calls them “White,” says the USA was A-OK till Vietnam… Clearly he still had some reading to do. Anyway, as with Brievik, this shows that ideological “extremism” is far from motivating such acts. People flip because of personal experiences and psychological make-up, not because of Hitler or Holohoax revisionism. It also means that mainstreamers will have one less leg to stand on. By the time WN goes mainstream, Hitler will be fully rehabilitated and everyone will be cursing Jews without reservation.
Although it lacks the intelligence of the posts and comments on Counter-Currents, I would say that his ideas are largely consistent with the opinions expressed here. Of course, his violent actions are not.
I found this item from Roof’s Manifesto curious:
“…To take a saying from my favorite film, ‘Even if my life is worth less than a speck of dirt, I want to use it for the good of society.'””
The quotation is from the 2012 Japanese film, “Himizu”. Any of our resident film theorists familiar with this rather obscure picture? As the film has no popular following among White Nationalists (New or Old Right) my guess is that Roof was also a fan of Japanese Anime and Manga–he obviously admired Eastasians and saw them as potential allies.
Here’s the film’s IMDb page: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1900893/ and Wiki entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himizu_%28film%29
Thanks, I will include this in the annotated version.
There is a meme going around that he was a Manchurian candidate. The only person I think that qualifies for that is John McCain. However, when this comes from the new right, I have to wonder just what they are smoking. That a bright young man cannot figure out that he is being jerked around by the media and those who are supposed to be looking after his best interest becomes a fantasy we are in big trouble. The only thing I can think of is that he did not write this. That is what I want to know. Who knows what medications they have put him on now. So Dr. J. your proposal is very good.
Dylann Roof is alive, and eventually he will be able to testify about whether the manifesto is his work or not. Given that, it seems quite unlikely it is a fake.
Beyond that, if it were a fake, concocted for propaganda purposes, it would not be as moderate as it is.
He seems like a bright kid led to despair. His article brilliantly sums up all the major points we face as a race.
Sometimes I feel desperate seeing all the insanity going on around us, and I feel even more desperate seeing our people being so eager to continue on the path of the collective suicide.
But what can be done? When the real changes will finally happen?
I have to admit – I must wear a Liberal mask in my daily life for fear of losing my job. Oftentimes I say things I dont mean just to get along with people.
Im so tired of constantly having to play this “endorse the diversity” game. But what can I do? What can any of us WNs do when the whole might of the government apparatus is aimed at us?
One slip of a toung, one honest thought and your life could be ruined forever.
You got that right. Try living out here in delusional San Francisco. If you are a Minority (preferably female) LBGT, Tech worker or Bike coalition member, you’ve got the red carpet rolled out for you! Hell, a 2007 proposition passed by the city was just given approval by the wacko Supreme court that says all gun owners must have their guns locked in a safe or on trigger locks. Imagine having to suddenly use it in the middle of the night to protect your life and property when seconds count!
Face it people, we really are losing control of this country. The words “A government for the people, by the people and of the people” sounds meaningless today. Roof commited an evil act, but his heart and brain were trying to say and do the right thing. This makes him truly a most tragic figure.
As others have noted, this is sad. We need some way to get disgruntled, bright guys and push them through the kind of training a good high school would have given them in past. Classics, philosophy, standardized test prep. Being in a system that caters to dindus, jews, and women must take a toll on guys with crappy family arrangements.
Here is a hilarious video that illustrates the decline of standards in schools:
This young man was welcomed into a church by people who didn’t know him and was extended hospitality by these folks which he repaid with an unspeakable act of evil. What civilization in human history could condone let alone praise such an act ?
This rhetoric is becoming tiresome, Jeff A. Marlatt. Your post amounts to a preposterous straw man, as does your earlier absurdity regarding the strangling of babies, as if anyone here is condoning, let alone promoting any such nonsense.
Give it a rest.
That church has been a Marxist staging ground against white society for over 75 years, I will cry about the victims as much as the dindu’s cry when white people are attacked, murdered, and raped by their people.
Someone’s probably going to want to watch that Japanese film Himizu.
IMDB says: “Sumida and his schoolmate Keiko are 14 year old school kids living a dystopian existence where each of their parents’ hopes and encourages them to die. Set in tsunami-hit areas of Japan about May 2011, which is used as a backdrop, the story follows roughly that of the manga of the same name wherein Sumida fights frequently with his father, is abandoned by his mother and tends to reject friendly advances of others. Eventually, he kills his father and then, assuming his life is ruined, attempts to improve society by killing “bad” people. Although not immediately obvious, what instead happens is that he attacks psychotic and violent characters, while he instead learns from Keiko and the Yakuza and people who befriended him that he himself has become “sick”, eventually breaking free of the cycle of violence, but without a complete resolution of the issues raised during the movie before its end.”
Seems clear to me that there might be some parallels there with what Roof at least thought he was doing.
Hello Dr. Johnson,
Maybe this isn’t the kind of “sourcing” you were looking for, but it came to mind while reading so I thought I’d drop it in the comments for you to look at anyways. It is regarding the positive experience of slaves that Mr. Roof spoke of
There are hundreds of these slave narratives. The vast majority of them are positive reflections of the experiences blacks had as slaves.
I don’t think this is very wise of you.
“A tsunami can appear in a number of ways. If the first part of a tsunami to reach the coast is a trough, rather than a wave crest, the water along the shoreline is dragged back dramatically, exposing parts of the shore that are normally underwater and stranding many marine creatures.”
A curious crowd forms on the exposed seabed, completely unaware of the unforgiving calamity that awaits.
Perhaps he wanted to accelerate the conflict of races that he saw as inevitable. He may have thought that if the conflict did not start soon, there would be no White people left who would be willing to fight it at all.
His actions certainly did accelerate things. Whites are now seeing that their politicians are pandering traitors. With the Mitt Romney, the vibrant repug Nickey Haley, and the fabulous warmonger Lindsey Graham calling for the removal of the confederate flag. The left is also calling all white people terrorists, I think the lefts overreaction to this event is going to wake a lot of people up. They are denouncing white people all over the MSM and are forcing whites to confront the reality of how much Europeans are hated…
The quote that the media have latched onto is “they are raping our women”. I didn’t see reference to rape in his alleged manifesto (did I miss it?), so i’m not sure if this is of use to you, but I still think it’s important:
According to table 42 of that document, there are 0* cases of white on black rape but >20,000 cases of black on white rape. The * appended to the o indicates that the actual number could be at most 10.
I’ve been linking to that document in comments section, trying to frame Roof’s rampage in the same way the left frames black peoples’ rampages (he was a troubled teen who was trying to make a point about injustice, etc).
The left gets infuriated when I link that document, but conservatives are intrigued by it.
I believe this is the same table David Duke referred to in an interview one time about black on white crime. The black female interviewer almost couldn’t handle it. If I am not mistaken, these are victim survey data, not from actual convictions. With a crime like sexual assault I am inclined to think victim surveys are a more valuable source as they are often not successfully prosecuted or the suspect is not identified.
I remember looking at trustworthy data by the DOJ, from 2005, stating the number of BM o WW sexual assaults (which doesn’t persé equal rapes) at around 37.000 per year. WM on BW was indeed less than 10 per year.
I’ll look it up, and will link to it, if still available, at latest tomorrow.
These are good observation. This is why it is necessary that serious statistics is done regarding immigrant/minority crime. It is a good thing that it is being done in some European countries.
In regards to black crime and Hispanic crime, roof seems to think that blacks are a much bigger problem. He is correct about this.
Ron Unz, who runs the Unz Review, wrote an article that showed that the violent crime rate of a city is correlated more so with blacks (i.e., how many blacks live in a city) than with poverty. But Unz also found that Hispanics are about as much correlated with violent crime as whites, which is sort of what Roof was saying.
Just FYI Sean Last has a good rebuttal to Unz’s results in regards to Hispanic crime: http://therightstuff.biz/2013/06/18/the-true-colors-of-race-and-crime/
This backlash from Europeans should come as no surprise, we under attack in our own Nations, the Main Stream Media (MSM) never talks about Black on White crime in our Nations.
Here in the States according to Government statistics, 90% of all interracial crime is black against white.
Europeans have endured many hardships and have been misled by our own governments; we have many obstacles to overcome, not the least of which was given up our own identity.
Europeans were told that it’s improper and even immoral to think of ourselves as a group.
Those days are over; we have stopped apologizing and began to think collectively, but it’s still difficult for some Europeans accept that they have been deceived by the cabal, however they are slowly waking, to the nightmare foisted upon them.
Europeans will likely be scared badly for several generations to come.
No other race on earth as had to endure the attack on their collective identity, nor forcibly made to favor of other races.
There definitely is a media conspiracy on the subject of Black on White Crime. Just like Roof says, I too experienced a rude awakening when I first discovered this matter years ago. What I’ve seen and read about it online has shaken me terribly! My theory is that the media blackout on this subject is that they may believe that if the majority really knew about this, there would be a rise in White vigilante attacks on Blacks. Could there be another more plausible explanation?
As far as Europe is concerned, yes they probably have it worse than we do. They don’t just have massive Black on White crimes, they have to contend with a rising tide of crimes by Muslims! Their Justice system is also a joke. Mass murderers for example can only be held for 21 years. After that, they must be released. Does anyone know if this law has been repealed or amended?
Regarding his claim that “Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals.”
(1) Lynam D. et al. 1993. Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 187-196.
Black boys (12- and 13-year-olds) have a greater delinquency rate, compared to white boys. The authors explain this via environmental (e.g. school) influences, although we know self-control is (A) one of the main factor that produces delinquency, and (B) it is very heritable:
(2) Wright J. P. et al. 2005. Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children – a genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s Theory of Low Self-Control. Criminology, 43, 1169-1202.
(3) Wright J. P. et al. 2008. Evidence of negligible parenting influences on self-control, delinquent peers, and delinquency in a sample of twins. Justice Quarterly, 35, 544-569.
Also, blacks have smaller frontal lobes, and these structures are involved, among other things, in planning and impulse control:
(4) Bean R. B. 1906. Some racial peculiarities of the Negro brain. American Journal of Anatomy, 5, 353–432.
(5) Rushton J. P. 2000. Race, evolution, and behavior: a life history perspective (3rd edition). Charles Darwin Research Institute.
(6) Levin M. 2005. Why race matters. New Century Books.
Adult blacks also have a lower capacity for delaying gratifications (a measure of self-control):
(7) Mischel W. 1961. Preference for delayed reinforcement and social responsibility. he Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 1-7.
…and tend not to form monogamous relationships. For example, see:
(8) Draper P. 1989. African marriage systems: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Ethology and Sociobiology 10, 145–169.
(9) Broman C. L. 1993. Race differences in marital well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 724–732.
(10) Philbrick, J. L. et al. 1988. Sex differences in love attitudes of black students. Psychological Reports, 62, 414-414.
…and have a greater number of sexual partners:
(11) Finer L. B. et al. 1999. Sexual partnership patterns as a behavioral risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 228–236.
(12) Valois R. F. et al. 1999. Relationship between number of sexual intercourse partners and selected health risk behaviors among public high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 328–335.
…given the fact that, in primates, a larger brain is associated with monogamy:
(11) Schillaci M. A. 2006. Sexual selection and the evolution of brain size in primates. PLoS ONE, 1, e62.
Lastly, it seems that blacks have a “faster life history” strategy: they mature faster, are more impulsive and aggressive, begin their sexual life faster, and have more children. These effects are largely mediated by their big score on the anti-social personality (the former psychopathic personality):
(12) Lynn R. 2002. Racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 273-316.
(13) Lynn R. 2003. Race differences in psychopathic personality: a reply to Skeem and Zuckerman. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1471–1477.
Blacks and whites have the same amount of testosterone, but blacks have a greater estrogen level:
(14) Rohrmann S. et al. 2007. Serum estrogen, but not testosterone, levels differ between black and white men in a nationally representative sample of Americans. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 92, 2519-2525.
Others claim that blacks have a greater level of testosterone, and this generates their tendency towards (A) a greater number of sexual contacts and (B) aggressiveness:
(15) Templer D. I. 2010. Can’t see the forest because of the trees. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 102-103.
He should have read a book by William Gayley Simpson. “Imperium” I recommend too, although I know Yockey is not for everyone.
Roof’s comments are sound on Negroes, mixed on Jews and Hispanics, and dead wrong on Asians. Where’s the real world evidence for any “alliance” with East Asians? Derbyshire’s bedroom? Meanwhile, in the real world:
The “game” PUA spin on Roof:
“Dylann Storm Roof (dat fuckin wigger name), the Charleston church shooter, looks like the even more soulless twin of Adam Lanza, Sandy Hook school shooter. Same misshapen omega male face, minus a score of IQ points.”
Well, remember, as the gamesters tell us, don’t worry about any of this and just sit poolside (albeit not in McKinney Texas). Men who worry about race and civilization, “they don’t get any poosy.”
Seeing as almost all angles have been covered here; let me just post an excerpt from a mgtow character called Barbarossa.
“You rape our women, and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go,”
This is why I believe racial nationalists of all stripes to be the pathetic gynocentric whiteknights I suspect they are. In this, we see the claim that there is some sort of epidemic of black men raping white women, and this Roof character felt the need to don his cape and shoot what were mostly middle aged or elderly black church-goers in retaliation.
Can’t say I disagree regarding the gynocentrism. The “black rape epidemic” is used–quite cynically I might add–by many WN groups to emotionally get young men hooked in. So damn right WN shouldn’t abandon him… they created him and led him to believe that “blecks” were the reasons why no White woman gave him the time of day, that he can’t find worthwhile employment as a White man and that his potential future is worth less than a speck of dirt.
The “manosphere” offers some valid critiques and observations about modern gender relations and feminism. However, just like feminism it seems to try to drive a wedge between white men and white women. Rather than encouraging white men and women to form partnerships and start families, white men are told that all white women are fat and neurotic and should be shunned. While there is undoubtedly a cultural problem that whites are facing, there are still virtuous white women left. Furthermore, White Knighting is when a man submits to a woman’s poor judgement in order to get laid. Being concerned about your people getting raped is not white knighting. And it is a fact that nonwhites are commit rape of women at a higher rate than white women. Just look at Sweden or Rotherham. MGTOW weakling Barbarossa is not worthy of that name.
So the “black rape epidemic” is some kind of propaganda tool? What about the disproportionate black crime in other area, including white color crime? I think the rape statistics are just being used to make the point that the races are different in their behavior patterns. Maybe this Roof thought he was saving the white women. People like to use the angle that white men are jealous of blacks and that is the real reason they join up with right-wing movements. In some cases that might very we’ll be true, but that doesn’t mean there is not a real problem for whites, and thus a real obligation to take action in some way that would actually help.
So we are supposed to be MGTOWs and not rescue white women? What about white men sexually assaulted by blacks in the prison system? I don’t know if there is this “white privilege” or not but whites are definitely a target. And they are targeted because they are white.
Free Dylann Roof! Blacks Always try to free perps if these are brought in court. Let us whites do the same for Dylann. A few years in prison serves justice enough, use the fact that victims have forgiven him. Save his ass, no death penalty for Dylann, secure his future.
Blacks are significantly less intelligent and more sociopathic than whites. So why, exactly, should we model our behavior on theirs?
Because of five reasons:
1. it is noble and good to stand by your own people
2. Activism is more effective if you limit your goal and message to something appealing
3. You can give a face to evil (i.e. the governor, Nikki Haley, who demands the death penalty)
4. Many ‘good’ people oppose the death penalty, so they should choose your side
5. As it has shown to be an effective way to foster racial solidarity among blacks, it will also work for whites.
1. White people look down on our criminals. Blacks and browns stand by them.
2. Not sure what you find appealing in this mess.
3. Most of us support the death penalty. I am not going to pretend otherwise for cheap political theater.
I hope he goes with a public defender.
“I hope he goes with a public defender.”
Are you saying you hope he’ll get the least competent defence possible and get the death penalty?
I hope that the system, not our movement, foots the bill.
1. Racial solidarity doesn’t imply moral universalism, people aren’t equal, some whites are criminal, some whites are nice, but it should always be: “good or bad, my white brother”. That’s a noble cause.
2. It’s very appealing and a very good cause to depict yourself as someone who wants to forgive a young man and who pleas for his future.
3. Death penalty is all right in other cases, like people who murder out of greed or evil perversity, but in this case we see a young man in despair, a white young man who thought about his future, found that he had no future, because his whiteness is considered a reason to oppress him. Perhaps he was mistaken, he is so young, he deserves a future.
OK, I’ll do as many as time allows tonight. Great article by the way.
1) “Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it. ”
The study is behind a paywall but it’s consistent with most studies in this area as far as I know, to quote from the abstract: “African Americans obtained significantly higher ethnic identity and self-esteem scores than the other 2 groups [American hispanics and Whites].”
2) “I saw that the same things were happening in England”
I think the best piece on the farcical Lawrence case and the proceeding MacPherson inquiry is at TOO: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/08/doreen-and-karen-a-tale-of-two-mothers/
“The discrepancy in the treatment of the two cases can only be understood through the prism of the victimhood hierarchy. While Mrs Lawrence is the mother of a Black teenager, Mrs Downes and her daughter both belong to the despised White working class.”
3) “The other reason is the Jewish agitation of the black race.”
In the past: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p-91_Grubach.html
“Jews, emerging from the catastrophe of the Second World War, their recent past shaped by their experience of anti-Semitism in the United States and the legacy of Eastern European socialism, latched onto a political agenda which, they believed, would ensure their success in America: Society should not make distinctions based on race or religion. That was good for blacks — but it was good for Jews, too.”
“Jews wrote most of the checks that bankrolled the fights of Martin Luther King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC); of SNCC, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and the Freedom Rides of James Farmer and CORE (the Congress of Racial Equality). Ever since the early years of the NAACP more than fifty years before, with a Jewish president and, a few years later, a black national organizer, leading Jews on the board of directors, and a vocal black membership, blacks and Jews were linked in the fight to end racial discrimination.”
And today: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/10/aipac-rabbi-calls-for-militant-nonviolent-resistance-to-racial-injustice-in-st-louis/
“Susan Talve is the progressive rabbi in St. Louis who has been active in racial justice issues in Ferguson while supporting Israel’s occupation of Jerusalem and its onslaught on Gaza during her Israel lobby-sponsored trip to the Jewish state last summer.”
4) “But of course I dont deny that we are in fact superior.”
A sticky issue, But Dr Levin approaches the question from a purely empirical basis and I think he comes up with the right answer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAon55ggtcw
(We know who he really thinks is superior but I think it’s a comeplling argument none the less)
5)”I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive.”
“Freedom is all right, but de niggers was better off befo’ surrender, kaze den dey was looked after an’ dey didn’ get in no trouble fightin’ an’ killin’ like dey do dese days.”
” Young children and infants were there, with very respectable colored nurses—young women, with bandanna and plaid cambric turbans, and superior in genteel appearance to any similar class, as a whole, in any of our cities.”
6)”Anyone who thinks that White and black people look as different as we do on the outside, but are somehow magically the same on the inside, is delusional. How could our faces, skin, hair, and body structure all be different, but our brains be exactly the same? This is the nonsense we are led to believe.”
Thanks. This is a big help.
Here’s another one pertaining to Jewish agitation of blacks, with scumbag George Soros almost single-handedly keeping those riots going:
“In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.”
Charleston Mother Emanuel AME Church Shooting – Discussion Thread…
“…the AME church network is the most politically -and racially- connected network of affiliates in the nation. The AME network is the faith based power structure for the professional Black Grievance Industry.”
As usual in cases like this, some weird stuff is coming to the surface…
“Everybody’s making him out to be racist, but here I am in front of you today as a Black man and telling you I look at him no different today than what I looked at him last week, because he never said anything racist to me, never treated me any different than he treated Justin [the other (White) friend].”
I don’t find this surprising. He grew up around a lot of blacks. He is bound to have had black friends, which he probably had not shed yet, even given his developing racialist beliefs.
By the way, regarding the question of why he chose the type of target that would alienate so many potential sympathisers:
He wanted to kill as many people as possible and get away unharmed (though he seems to have had no plan of permanently escaping detection). If he had gone and shot up some place where black criminals congregate, he’d have been jumped on and beaten into a coma after the first couple of shots, or one of them might have shot back and killed him. Also, he obviously wanted there to be no uncertainty about the political nature of the killing. Given his prior arrest for drugs, if he had shot at black criminals, there would always be the suspicion that it was a drug deal gone wrong, or some other criminal dispute.
I’m not normally to conspiratorially minded, but his indulgent pictures wherein he looks like a KKK lampoon are perhaps even more curious than his actions and choice of target. They look exactly like something the Daily Show might design (wardrobe, hair, props, etc) for a bit to make fun of nationalists. They couldn’t have been more perfectly designed for maximum media impact against white interests. That, in combination with his actions and target, are just too perfectly aligned to work against his supposed goals.
The Manifesto is a curious mix of astute mirroring of mid-tier nationalist concerns, and completely missing obvious insights – the largest one of all would be knowing that such a mass shooting would only lead to harm for his cause.
For example, his insight into institutionalized White feelings of superiority and Black feelings of inferiority, illustrated with analogy, reflects an exceptional level of intelligence. Though, I’m not sure that I completely agree with it. In comparison, the Jewish Question is not that complex and yet, even knowing that his Manifesto would be widely read the world over, he cops out by stating that he does not understand them and that they are an enigma. To recap, he gives lip service to arguably the most pressing nationalist complaint that is needed for credibility, but fails to explain anything about it to the world in the vein that he more or less does with Blacks.
In the end, killing a bunch of Church ladies to further White nationalism is like killing a bin of Golden Retriever puppies. It only brings hate, which i understand is a plausible motivation for him as he likely believes that the conflict will be won through attrition. However, it should be apparent to anyone who speaks to this cause that the war is a moral war. WN’s need to enforce this paradigm to prevent events like this from occurring. Anyone who violates its spirit needs to be rejected as an ally. By virtue of ignorance or subversion, they are not. This includes all “marching organizations”. The Jews win without them, and because of their internal culture. We should be building culture that builds group political power, not fanaticism. We cannot win a war of attrition. That is not how modern wars are fought. Modern wars must always be first morally defensible if they are to be won. The Jews beat us and continue to beat us because they engineered the moral milieu to be against us. The world must be convinced of the morality of our cause if we are to win, or perhaps the Media arbiters of this hostile and foreign morality need only to be dismantled for the majority to be free to stand up. Either way, the moral high ground must be fought for and protected as much as possible even beyond any hypothetical future victory. War is war and killing occurs, but it must occur through a moral lens.
The same issue applies to Weev’s recent appearance over at TRS. His bullshit should have been anticipated a mile away. He should not have been let on as he cannot be trusted given his allegiance to a Troll ethic. We should take all assistance from him that is actually helpful, but keep people like him and Justine Tunney at arms length precisely because they are vague in their loyalty or otherwise have proven themselves to have a penchant for making damaging comments. Saying what he said on the only website to be successfully walking the hair-width line toward actually deconstructing much of the language and narrative of the core of the left is absolutely unforgivable. He took their satire and made it real. Furthermore, those guys should have realized it and edited out the remarks. They damage anyone who has been associated with the site, to include Greg Johnson. Fuck Weev and all others who knowingly or unwittingly damage our cause. We need either much more disciplined control over our discourse or we need actual leaders who can reign in and deal with subversives. I have much more antipathy toward them than I do our claimed enemies.
I do wonder who took the photos, because actually, some of them are well-composed. I disagree, though, that they seem calculated to inflict maximum damage on the cause. They are certainly not a Leftist’s parody of the Right. Consider this picture, for instance:
It seems half-hippie/flower child to me.
The same is true of the manifesto. If it were written to inflict maximum damage, why is it moderate on so many points? E.g., women, East Asians, Hispanics, even Jews.
Frankly, all the anomalies of this case point to its genuineness, not fakery.
As for Weev: the TRS leadership regretted their invitation and have adopted tougher standards. Any defender of sociopathic personality traits sets off alarm bells for me.
We stand for the restoration of racially and ethnically homogeneous, high trust white societies. To do that, we much exclude not just non-whites, but also sociopathic outliers in our own community. If that is the kind of society we want to create, then we need to make our movement a microcosm of it in the present. Wouldn’t it be nice if the White Nationalist community were as wholesome, savory, and high-functioning as, say, the Mormons? Wouldn’t it be nice if someone like Dylann Root could have reached out to a local White Nationalist who was also an upstanding member of the community? He might have had a better life and been able to contribute something positive to the cause.
I agree in full, re: your last paragraph.
One has to study the enemy (or merely your envied culture of choice) and how it wins, on all fronts. The enemy wins because of the specific structure of its culture. Mormons are a great example of an enviable Kosher gentile community, but not the best example for emulation. Why? Because they were not able to retain their ethnocentric protection, the core of any group’s political power. They were impressively able to keep it through the 1970’s. However, they had a cultural weakness that was exploited. I believe that their priesthood culture simply was not strong enough and self-protected enough. In contrast, Jews have been able to retain explicit racial chauvinism in the face of all criticism. This is because of the nature of their Orthodox. The culture is effectively impenetrable to outside influence.
That being said, your thoughts are precisely on target for what indigenous Europeans need. The most effective route would be an Orthodox culture that was structurally parallel to but did not interact with Judaism. This would politically nullify their effect, if it could survive all onslaught. The second best option would be to convert to Judaism but keep a measure of Aryan chauvinism and Semitic exclusion. This is effectively what they do to us. This is what the Jews fear most, and it is a primary reason why they are so hesitant to take converts or to trust them. It has the most potential to ruin their political strategy and structure.
Any culture that breeds family values and can act as an ethnic shelter would be psychologically healing for Whites. It would also, by definition, breed a certain amount of political power. Though, nothing is as powerful as the structure of Judaism. Hence, my strategic suggestions. Though, I would advocate for something that rejected their materialism for a more Aryan compatible metaphysics. We would just need to inoculate it against pathological altruism. I admire Mormonism, but in the end it is a Sci-Fi novel mixed with Freemasonry and Judeophilia. It’s a hollow apple that ultimately elevates and supports our primary adversary. Despite their support for the Jews, their culture was attacked and compromised likely when it was deemed that Israel would survive with or without their support (my conjecture).
Greg, your picture is way too big! I can see a slice of this guy (I see part of his right arm/leg -that’s it). I am unable to view the picture in whole. 🙁 Please downsize it.
Modern wars must first be morally defensible to be won? Does that apply to Israel?
Greg, just as an aside, Andrew Anglin’s paranoid reaction to this event seems to indicate you were spot on about him using amphetamines. Good pick-up.
His writing style, grandiosity, and bad logic strongly smack of stimulants. And he himself has alluded to them. But for all I know, he lives on coffee or Red Bull.
I fear that the terrorist act of this Storm-Roof character has been mishandled by America’s political establishment (which means we may live in “interesting” times quite soon.)
1. Roof is a person on the margins of society that is acting out on a serious problem happening in the core of society. Problems at the core play out in the margins. The Algerian FLA started with marginal, Roof-like human capital and then moved on to snap up core members of their society. The core-margin problem here is that there are undeniable terrible racial tensions which have been building up since the Obama Campaign and the MSM highlighted the Trayvon Martin fiasco. No one with an objective brain can see that affair, and the ones after it, as something other than half-baked Soviet propaganda from the Brezhnev Era. The “Civil Rights” movement lost all moral credibility in 2012 and the results of that are playing out right now.
Obama used Trayvon to help get elected but in doing so unleashed social forces he can’t control. It’s happened before-remember that Henry VIII just wanted a divorce.
2. Attacking the church was an amoral act of terrorist genius. Black churches are light on actual morality, ethics, and serious theology but heavy on politics. When I first heard about this I figured that a husband was getting revenge on the minister for having an affair with his wife. When I realized it was terrorism with the symbology it carried-Rhodesia, Charleston, and a manifesto I knew this was something more. The black political victories of the 1960s “Civil Rights” area played out from a religious, off-limits safe zone. That safe zone is now gone. All black churches are now stuck with a bunker morality. To use the Algerian example-the police stations must be sandbagged and surrounded with razor wire and no Algerian Arab can go to a Pied Noir beach or cafe. To blacks, as we discovered in the Trayvon Martin fracas, all whites (or non-blacks) look alike. In future, a delegation of “justice”seeking white Quakers may be “asked to leave” a politically active black church for “security reasons.” Everything looks different from the view behind the sandbags.
America’s senior politicians have recognized what this crisis is and have tried to lessen its impact. President Obama tried to steer this to the safe topic of gun control and Jeb Bush tried to make it an issue of the Culture War just passed-secularists attacking “people of faith.” Nothing to see here folks move along. Remember the GWOT has been going on more than a decade and there are a million vets of that conflict. The Senior Politicians have learned something. However junior politicians in South Carolina have just handed Roof a greater victory by stirring up a controversy over the Rebel Flag in Charleston. Now every Civil War enthusiast, Southern Activist, and history buff in the South has been put metaphorically on Roof’s team. The British did the same sort of thing in response to Easter 1916. Remember that the Irish booed Padraic Pearce. Meanwhile, the racial conflict at the core has not been addressed.
One more thing-what happens when there is tit-for-tat retaliatory violence from an angry, impulsive black. That’s coming for sure.
Hurricane Roof has made landfall in South Carolina. Full scope of the damages are yet to be seen.
I recently taught in school districts with student bodies that are 100% white. I experienced such an enthusiastic and warm reception at each of these schools that it was quite embarrassing. It appeared that I was embraced by the students because I satisfied a hunger in these high performing schools for intellectual stimulation. They liked to be challenged with my endless collection of brain teasers, and really appreciated the way I taught math, training them as better thinkers and learners along the way and embracing the onus to convince them of the validity of the concepts imparted. They in turn, through their performance and their response to me, reinforced my belief that a teacher really has the best job in the world. As I read Dylan’s writing, I couldn’t help wishing that I had him as a student. He is clearly a thoughtful person and I believe both the other students alluded to and I would probably have influenced him for the better.
Hello from Italy
these few words just to say that this boy should have nothing to do with any kind of “traditional” or “nationalist” world-view. He was a drugged, selfish and sociopatic subject, the product of the american capitalist system and nothing more.
His views on race, society etc. are childish and based simply on internet wanking. Why he did not get involved in a political group?
I don’t see no greatness, no light, no strenght in here, just psychic problems, jealousy etc.
This has nothing to do with confederate heroes who died bravely and nothing to do with european heritage.
Despite the overwelming racial problems, I think the best response is to build something beutiful, to be an example, not to drug yourself, isolate and go rampart.
Grow a family, go to public debates, create a clan or…
That said, I feel no sorry for those deaths.
His views on race, society etc. are childish and based simply on internet wanking
He dropped out of high school, never learned how to use an apostrophe, and sometimes misspells simple words. But he is more insightful — far more insightful — than most of us were at his age.
It’s well and good to condemn his violence. We should all condemn it. But his intelligence shouldn’t be denied.
I wish with a passion that niggers were treated terribly throughout history by Whites, that every White person had an ancestor who owned slaves, that segregation was an evil an oppressive institution, and so on. Because if it was all it true, it would make it so much easier for me to accept our current situation. But it isnt true. None of it is. We are told to accept what is happening to us because of ancestors wrong doing, but it is all based on historical lies, exaggerations and myths. I have tried endlessly to think of reasons we deserve this, and I have only came back more irritated because there are no reasons.
He does have more insight on race than 99 per cent of his coevals. It stems from curiosity and the will to do the necessary research. I don’t deny his innate intelligence and perspicacity, but this insight can be acquired by anyone of modest intelligence who has an Internet connection and is willing to learn.
I agree with Roscommonguy.
The fact he may say something of any interest does not change the fact his thought are childish and in the end based mainly on abstraction, on internet-nerd-life. Not real life. Not a political life.
As a mature man you can’t use a child point of view for your political fight, isn’t it? If not, any child, any boy, could give you an “intelligent insight” on almost anything. But the fact is that real life experience, growing into a real situation, bonding with other people makes you a man, closing you in a room writing your crazy isolated philosophy is usually seen as a medical matter.
Watch at “classical” racialists and you will see “men of their time”, deeply rooted in political struggle and in historical reality.
Despite defending anything about this boy – I say forget him forever – I think the good and strong battle is a symbolic one: put the confederate flag in it’s place, say the truth about it and history on the streets, on conferences etc. Impose a talk on truth that any man of european descent can understand in the southern states of US. That’s a good battle, in my eyes.
Let me join Irmin in calling complete BS on Francesco (Roscommonguy’s comment, I’ll simply ignore since he produces words without actually saying anything).
Not only was Roof clearly very intelligent and insightful, his positions on Jews and Asians, deemed as largely incorrect by most on our side, are more than anything a clear sign of an independent thinker. While he may have been in the wrong on certain issues, it was by conscious disagreement. He knew what the generally held opinions were on these issues in our Movement, but he didn’t adopt them as long as he wasn’t personally convinced himself (would’ve been just a matter of time obviously).
In a way, this is even more impressive than if he’d just parrotted all the ‘traditional’ views.
Bottom line it all comes down to this. The establishment has the power to choose which stories get attention and which don’t, which details are emphasized and which are omitted, which incidents we’re repeatedly reminded of and told to draw moral conclusions from, and even lie. Much as I deplore how Roof’s actions played into the hands of anti-Whites, and wish desperately that he had had someone to counsel him out of such a stupid act, it’s seems to me that it is statistically inevitable that sooner or later some White man would have done something that played into the establishment’s hand. That’s simply how the system works. After all, as many people pointed out here, if we were to objectively look at all racial hate crimes in the West, we would already be overwhelmingly on the high ground, but unfortunately we don’t get to choose what people are exposed to.
Every single thing Dylan Roof stated in his manifesto is correct. I agree with all of it. It’s as if I wrote it myself.
I’m a East Asian and I think its the time my white Brother and sisters
come together to fight against the black.I think the white race is a powerful race they can make a change I will loved to be allies of a powerful race.
I came here to find the facts and I was not disappointed. Lots of thoughtful insights. I was a little surprised that no one mentioned the issue of cognitive dissonance and it’s negative psychological effects. Anybody care to enlighten me? I awakened at a late age and I have a lot of catching up to do. Thanks.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment