2,561 words
My interest in events in Russia and Ukraine centers on their impact on white survival and Jewish power. By “Jewish power” I mean the totalitarian Left generally, including the US and other governments of the ex-West. In other words, the term encompasses cooperative and loyal goyim of every race, even though the motive force is Jewish. Anything that harms white survival or advances Jewish power and totalitarian globalism is bad. What follows are some observations about recent developments in the region from such a perspective.
The 2014 revolution in Ukraine, a top-down one, was driven by Jewish interests and the Left-wing governments and cosmopolitan elites associated with them—globalists. Ukraine is right on Russia’s doorstep. The presence of authentic white nationalists among the Ukrainian revolutionaries does not negate this.
White Power
There are genuinely pro-white individuals and groups in both Ukraine and Russia. At present they appear to be much more systematically suppressed in Russia than Ukraine. But that could change quickly (i.e., be suppressed in Ukraine as well). A mere ten or fifteen years ago there was a significant pro-white, anti-Jewish movement in Russia. It has since been crushed.
Putin’s Russia is as anti-white as any European state, using government and criminal law to suppress speech, association, and democracy for whites, Holocaust revisionists, and others. It is a crime to possess a copy of Hitler’s Table Talk, a historical work, though, to my knowledge, the works of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, and other Communists collectively responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of human beings are not banned. In other words, it’s like the West.
Such behavior is a gross violation of human rights, and toxic to our race.
Nevertheless, white nationalists remain bit players in Ukraine, as elsewhere. They are harbingers of our future, if we have one, but their influence must be kept in perspective and properly related to larger forces.
According to a Russian news report, Right Sector leader Dmitry Yarosh, a candidate for the presidency of Ukraine, met privately with the Governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Igor Kolomoisky. Kolomoisky is a multibillionaire Israeli-Ukrainian dual citizen, president of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine, and comrade of Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Vadim Rabinovich, also a candidate for the presidency in the May 2014 elections. The Right Sector leader denied receiving political contributions from oligarchs: “We’re not using oligarchs’ money in politics, but when a war is on, we do not object to their funding the army,” he said.
Jews and government have a long history of “allying” themselves with, funding, training, arming, and manipulating their opponents, including militant Arab Muslims, in pursuit of other objectives. Such behavior is not new. If you’re going to lie down with rattlesnakes, at least be aware of the risks, including the massive disparity of power, and try to retain your principles.
It is salutary to participate in current events, but essential to keep in mind Margaret Mead’s dictum that “An educated person has a sense of time, of sequence and simultaneity of events; a sense of place, where he is in relation to the rest of the world.”
The dynamics of the situation inevitably highlight and exacerbate old-style petty nationalism: Ukrainian versus Russian and Russian versus Ukrainian. It would be better if we could think as whites.
Tightening the Noose
With Russia, Iran, North Korea, Syria and, formerly, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the multitude of states destroyed in the so-called “Arab Spring” and “color revolutions,” we observe the progressive destruction of one nominally independent state after another.
The events in Ukraine are part of the same design, which, over the long term, may signify the replacement of a fragmented by a unitary world order.
Thus, events in Ukraine should be viewed as part of a continuous, directed process encompassing decades. Jews have a much longer time horizon than whites. For example, the persecutions of Ernst Zündel, John Demjanjuk, Robert Faurisson, David Irving, and countless others are incredible to contemplate. Measured purely in terms of years consumed, they devoured massive portions of their victims’ lives.
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a shadowy neoconservative outfit funded by the US government, has continuously interfered in internal Ukrainian affairs since 1988. Consider, too, that a whole decade has already passed since Ukraine’s “Orange Revolution” of 2004-2005. The late Jewish oligarch Boris Berezovsky heavily financed it. Also in the thick of things were the U.S. State Department, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the International Republican Institute, Freedom House, and billionaire Jew George Soros’s Open Society Institute.
Long-term operations such as those in Ukraine, or legal and domestic-terrorist campaigns against writers, do not materialize magically out of the ether, or finance and carry themselves forward spontaneously.
An example of a regularly-occurring formal gathering associated with the changeover in Ukraine is the Yalta European Strategy (YES), an international organization founded during the Orange Revolution to promote Ukraine’s entry into the European Union. It is the primary high-level “private” Ukraine-EU forum pushing integration. Attending recent summits have been such influential Jews as Paul Krugman, Shimon Peres, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and Larry Summers, as well as Gentile luminaries including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Tony Blair, Štefan Füle (look him up), and Alexei Kudrin, from 2000-2011 Russia’s (yes, Putin’s Russia) Minister of Finance (= Secretary of the Treasury), among many others.
YES is the brainchild of multibillionaire Ukrainian Jewish financier Viktor Pinchuk, who runs hedge funds and owns industrial firms, four television channels, and a popular tabloid. In 2010 Time magazine named him one of the world’s 100 most influential people. He married the daughter of Leonid Kuchma, longtime Communist Party functionary (1960-1991) and former Prime Minister and President of Ukraine. (De-Communization was deemed unnecessary by the West because Communists are fraternal twins of so-called “liberal democrats.”)
Pinchuk spent more than $6 million on his 50th birthday party in Courchevel, a ski resort in the French Alps. Among other extravagances he had the Cirque de Soleil flown in for entertainment. He was a guest at Bill Clinton’s 60th birthday party in New York City. A member of the Ukrainian Parliament from 1998 to 2006, he belonged to the Labour Ukraine Party.
The Big Picture
Russian sovereignty is the target. Despite the fact that Russia is anti-white, it is better to have competing power centers in the world than a single monolithic order.
From 1989 to 1991, under Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia withdrew its troops and tank armies back to the Urals, and the Soviet Union was dissolved into 15 nations. Russia lost Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. In the space of three years the USSR surrendered an empire, a third of its territory, and half of its people.
In the 1990s, under corrupt Russian President Boris Yeltsin, US hustlers colluded with local oligarchs, mostly Jews, to steal the industrial plant, natural resources, and mass media of the Russian people.
The “West” pushed NATO right up to Russia’s borders, swallowing Communist Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and the former Soviet republics of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. The decadent, totalitarian European Union expanded in a similarly belligerent, threatening manner. European objections were all that prevented NATO war guarantees from being granted to Ukraine and Georgia.
Eastward expansion of NATO (military)
Eastward expansion of the European Union (economic, social, political)
Besides overthrowing the government of Serbia in what amounted to a military attack on Europe in 1999, neoconservatives conducted “color revolutions” in Russia’s former republics—the Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan in 2005, and Ukraine’s own Orange Revolution in 2004.
Meanwhile, incessant meddling by Jews, politicians, bureaucrats, foreign intelligence agencies, bipartisan NGOs, financiers, the mass media, and academics stirred up trouble throughout the region. Politics and attitudes could not develop through a natural process of give-and-take. Everything was subject to continuous manipulation conducted in a furtive, underhanded manner.
Putin’s recent seizure of Crimea, loudly decried by the West, is a non-issue. Russia’s Black Sea Fleet is headquartered there. Although Crimea has belonged to Russia for most of the modern era, and has a Russian-speaking majority, Putin’s action had little to do with political philosophy or ethno-nationalism. Was he to sit idly by while the enemy grabbed his key naval base? The move was driven by strategic necessity.
Even a less than objective Establishment neoconservative grudgingly concedes that “the Black Sea Fleet is not currently much of a force, consisting of about forty aging vessels dating primarily from the 1970s.” But it is what Russia has.
Vladimir Putin: Strongman or Straw Man?
Western governments and media portray Putin as a strongman, a Nazi, a new Hitler governing a rogue state. But concocting and repeating outlandish lies does not make them true.
It is a bizarre consequence of living under a tightly controlled rather than a free press that bit players can be billed as major stars, and audiences hoodwinked by it.
The racialist movement in North America is utterly destitute and powerless, yet there isn’t a politician, cop, secret police agent, prosecutor, or judge anywhere who doesn’t seriously think white racialists pose a massive, hidden threat to the System. As far as they’re concerned, there’s a Nazi under every bed. If a lone white man buys some lots in a ghost town in North Dakota every Jew, government official, and jackbooted thug in the world flies into a complete frenzy. God knows what they would have done to the Pilgrims.
In the same way, it is easy to be misled by the noisy anti-Russian, anti-Iranian, and like blather constantly churned out by the press.
North and South Korea at night. The splash of light in the lower right is southwestern Japan. The lights to the north are in China (Manchuria). The speck of light near the country’s west coast is the capital, Pyongyang.
To illustrate: everyone knows that North Korea is a fearsome component of a colossal, nebulous Axis of Evil. The ruling class propagates the myth without batting an eye. The truth, however, is different.
Russia is economically weak and strategically surrounded. Even if it harbored imperial ambitions it could not implement them.
I cannot imagine a scenario where Russia, which does not fundamentally differ from the “West” on core ideological principles, would employ whatever antiquated, inadequate nuclear arsenal it has against the states representing the enemies of mankind.
After all, Putin is not some crazed fanatic like the ADL or Israel. Like white South Africa, he lacks the will to employ nuclear weapons, and Jews would unhesitatingly atomically destroy Russia if he did (through proxies such as the United States and Great Britain, of course). Millions of white people would be incinerated.
The concentrated aggression against Russia since Putin came to power is predicated on the assumption—I believe, knowledge—that no nuclear danger exists. I take it for granted that the West monitors every conversation that occurs in the Russian government, and behaves accordingly.
According to a recent news report there was a forum where President Putin answered questions, and American whistleblower Edward Snowden, who exposed the unconstitutional spying by the US National Security Agency (NSA) on all private communications, was among those who posed a question. Snowden queried whether the Russian government spies on its citizens’ telecommunications. The revealing part of Putin’s response was that Russia could not afford such a program.
A number of economic sanctions have been imposed on powerful Russian and Jewish individuals (Putin maintains a large circle of Jewish oligarchs, government officials, and community leaders) and corporations, and Russia has been expelled from the Group of 8 (G8) industrial nations (the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Canada, Italy, and Japan).
Further sanctions are doubtless in the works. Jewish libertarian economist Milton Friedman used to argue that economic sanctions are ineffective, but this is clearly not the case. Jews use them all the time, and sanctions were key to destroying Rhodesia and South Africa. Economic isolation, theft of foreign assets, and similar measures are lucrative and effective for pirates.
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services recently cut its rating on Russian sovereign debt to BBB-, the lowest investment grade, and gave it a negative outlook, citing $51 billion of capital outflows in the first three months of 2014 versus $57 billion annually on average over the past five years (57 x 5 = – $285 billion—more than a quarter trillion dollars). The credit downgrade makes it more difficult and expensive to borrow money, exacerbating an already difficult financial situation.
Ukraine’s plight is even worse, despite billions of dollars of promised subventions from Western taxpayers. In early April 2014 Moody’s downgraded Ukraine’s sovereign debt from “extremely speculative” to “default imminent with little prospect for recovery.” To put it mildly, that is very bad; our politicians are likely throwing money down a rat hole.
So, the question is, does Putin have the power to respond effectively to the tightening cordon around his country? Is Russia, under any imaginable scenario, a genuine match for Jews and the West? Is there anything the country can really do?
Second, does Putin or anybody else in the leadership possess the will to oppose, in a determined manner, the forces arrayed against Russia? Since the leaders are not dedicated champions of the historical West, Europe, Christianity, white people, or even old-style Communism, it is hard to discern any principled grounds for zealous resistance. Yet, they are confronted by fanatics.
To be blunt, in terms of racial prejudice (anti-white), commitment to Jewish dominance, ideology (Left totalitarianism), corruption, and even values, Russia, Ukraine, and the West don’t seem all that different.
Ungovernable Appetites
Nowhere are whites powerful enough to assert their racial interests. If the US and EU maintain their foothold in Ukraine, or force Russia into full submission, Ukrainian nationalists will be swept aside and the power of Jewish globalism significantly augmented.
If, instead, alien forces suffer a temporary setback, they will continue their assault without letup through economic sanctions, manipulation of world opinion against Russia, agitation for “democracy,” “civil rights,” decadence (Pussy Riot, pornography, feminism, homosexuality), and sow permanent chaos and penury through economic sanctions, intelligence agency skullduggery, NGOs, multinational corporations, organized crime, repression, state-sponsored terrorism, and assassinations.
They will continue their machinations until they get what they want, or are destroyed. Since there is no serious counterforce on the horizon, the odds remain in their favor.
Their appetites are unquenchable. If they possessed self-control they wouldn’t recklessly import their rampaging destruction from the Middle East into Europe, which is already wobbling dangerously (like their main base of operations, the United States) from gross fiscal irresponsibility, crude repression of white activists, free speech, and democratic political movements, extreme decadence, and the manic destruction of indigenous white “Christian” populations through birth control, feminism, and replacement migration.
Indeed, far and away the most significant aspect of the Ukrainian “revolution” may be the continued mainstreaming of high-level political destabilization in Europe. The phenomenon could spread, not only there, but to neo-Europes overseas, creating genuine opportunities for revolutionary change.
Hopping perilously from ice floe to ice floe, Jews are making a high risk grab for world hegemony, gambling that they’ll be able to reach the other side before the frozen crossway breaks apart completely and they fall into the river and drown. Like countless criminal gangs before them they lack the will to limit their insatiable greed, lust, and sadism.
Caution and prudence they do not have. Ultimately, if no one else does, they will destroy themselves.
18 comments
Mr. Hamilton wrote:
Hopping perilously from ice floe to ice floe, Jews are making a high risk grab for world hegemony, gambling that they’ll be able to reach the other side before the frozen crossway breaks apart completely and they fall into the river and drown. Like countless criminal gangs before them they lack the will to limit their insatiable greed, lust, and sadism.
Caution and prudence they do not have. Ultimately, if no one else does, they will destroy themselves.
Question: What do we do to speed up this process for them (& hopefully increase our chances for white survival)??
Of course it’s tempting to imagine ourselves into the situation, as if we could shape it somehow by taking sides. As individuals living in the West we can’t, but as the article points out, there are white nationalists participating in the developing situation. My question is what should they do? Should Right Sector disband rather than accept their money and risk control by Jewish oligarchs? How will our side ever win if we don’t join in the game when opportunities, however flawed, present themselves? I keep thinking of the Taliban as it developed in Afghanistan in the 1980s, strategically CIA funded but ultimately beyond its control.
“Hopping perilously from ice floe to ice floe, Jews are making a high risk grab for world hegemony, gambling that they’ll be able to reach the other side before the frozen crossway breaks apart completely and they fall into the river and drown. Like countless criminal gangs before them they lack the will to limit their insatiable greed, lust, and sadism.”
Much the same could be said for the British empire and it’s successor the US.
If Russophiles are truly concerned about “Western” (i.e Anglo-American) aggrandizement the solution is simple: closer strategic relations between Russia and Europe (i.e the EU). Putin has fouled those waters pretty thoroughly however.
A massive European armaments expansion (including nuclear) may be our only remaining hope.
The jews are manipulating both sides of the conflict, their powerbase is the Anglo-American sphere but Russia is too important to be left alone:
Can’t get through a article in the NYT, without tripping over some jews.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/world/europe/ukraine-turns-to-its-oligarchs-for-political-help.html?_r=0
A pair of oligarchs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Pinchuk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ihor_Kolomoyskyi
And the new Prime Minister, who claims to be Ukrainian Greek Catholic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arseniy_Yatsenyuk
And a kicker: The mayor of Kharkov, too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hennadiy_Kernes
Who was for the Orange Revolution until he was against it, finding the way up the greasy pole easier by way of his pro-Russian, and Jewish, patron:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Dobkin
It’s like a trail of breadcrumbs.
As a reminder, the English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s “200 Years Together” never was published.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together
Hoo boy, Theresa Heinz’s husband is travelling to Kiev Tuesday to nail US prestige to an independent Ukraine.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/1.577502
What do you make of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, Mr Hamilton? He is half-jew and turned the Russian WN movement into a joke according to some.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Zhirinovsky
I don’t know much about Zhironovsky. He was talked about quite a bit in the 1990s, when I bought his book, My Struggle (1996), which had been translated into English and published by Jewish publisher Lyle Stuart’s Barricade Books. It is not long, but I never got around to reading it.
We need to secure nukes then we can secure our own states
In geopolitics, there are points when it has to be evaluated as to which side / option presents less scope for long term evil / damage. Perhaps this is one such. You only have to trawl through the pages of Weekly Standard and National Review to determine that.
Yes, the Jews really are playing for keeps. They always have been. Just look at the damage that they have inflicted in the 20th Century alone; and the wealth and power that they have gained in the process. Their greed, however, is hopelessly insatiable, as is their schizoid, innately demented paranoia. They will, like true parasites, eventually destroy themselves. Let’s help them do just exactly that, in any subversive way that we can.
My curiosity was piqued by the first word in your e-mail address. Does it have any special significance for you?
Mr. Hamilton:
I read all your writings with interest and learn a lot from them, thank you.
Not all of them have the same quality — you seem to be at your best talking about the German matters. But now that you ventured into the Russian ones, I have to be blunt with you: you have no clue about what you are talking about and should be ashamed of this article.
Not surprisingly: Russia is a big, complex country and you can’t possibly understand what’s going on there and around without a true immersion in some sort of its “culture”, including a full command of the language — obviously, not achievable for you. Otherwise, you will interpreting the interpreters, most likely multiplying the source’s non-sense.
Let me point out a few items in what you’ve just written. (Doesn’t mean that I disagree with all the points you made.)
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a shadowy neoconservative outfit funded by the US government, has continuously interfered in internal Ukrainian affairs since 1988.
And to the same extent in the Russian affairs, right? 1985 — “Gorbachev’s Perestroika” in the USSR begins. 1991 — the Soviet Union ends. If NED was present “there” in 1988, it was present in the USSR — I can’t see how it could be dealing with Ukraine only. The same applies to the other actors of the period you mentioned: they were working across the whole USSR, Russia not excepted.
Despite the fact that Russia is anti-white, it is better to have competing power centers in the world than a single monolithic order.
Only if the competing power center meets certain minimum qualifications. Have you thought about them? Would Russia meet them?
From 1989 to 1991, under Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia withdrew its troops and tank armies back to the Urals, and the Soviet Union was dissolved into 15 nations
What a sheer nonsense.
First, not necessarily “back to the Urals” — many if not most, to the European Russia.
Second, some if not most of the withdrawal happened after 1991, under Yeltsin, if I remember correctly.
Third, and most important, the Soviet Union “dissolved into 15 nation” against the strong resistance by Gorbachev, who fought it and Yeltsin tooth and nail — the process started in the December 1991 and went on in 1992, when Gorbachev was left to preside over the shrinking pool of the non-key Soviet republic.
(Where do you take your facts? Do you check them?..)
Russia lost Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia,
Russia didn’t lose anything: Russia was the most subdued of the Soviet Republics and got its independence from the ruling Communist clique, which had brought uncountable sufferings and losses to it. Russia didn’t own the Baltic Republics, in particular.
In the space of three years the USSR surrendered an empire, a third of its territory, and half of its people.
Don’t confuse “Russia” and “the USSR”.
“Russia” wanted to get rid yourself of the yoke of its resource-hungry “brethren”, especially in the Asia. “The USSR” — a faceless body of bureaucrats similar to the EU (a Gorbachev’s brain child) wanted to preserve itself — its power and privileges. None of the 15 members of the Union wanted to stay in the Union but “the Union” wanted to keep them all. Does that make sense to you?
In the 1990s, under corrupt Russian President Boris Yeltsin,
In order to label Yeltsin as “corrupt” you need to:
a. Show that he was corrupt (I don’t think so.)
b. I “a” is true, show that he was substantially more corrupt than at least one other Russia’s or the USSR’s ruler.
And who would that “less corrupt leader” be, Mr. Hamilton? Looking forward to a name from you, with explaining why you thing he was less corrupt than Yeltsin. (Your best shot would be Andropov. That might lead to an interesting conversation.)
The “West” pushed NATO right up to Russia’s borders, swallowing Communist Poland,
And if Poland wanted to be in the “West”? If they had good reasons to fear their big Russian “brother”? You know about the 1939-1940 events there, don’t you? And the after-WWII history, too?
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
Do you know how these three were merged into the USSR? (You should.)
Do you know what the Soviets did to these beautiful countries, their beautiful people? And they should have been stuck with their oppressor, you think?
To illustrate: everyone knows that North Korea is a fearsome component of a colossal, nebulous Axis of Evil. The ruling class propagates the myth without batting an eye. The truth, however, is different.
Would be interesting to know your views on the truth you meant here.
Russia, which does not fundamentally differ from the “West” on core ideological principles,
The core principles like what? Freedom of speech, perhaps? What else?
According to a recent news report there was a forum where President Putin answered questions, and American whistleblower Edward Snowden… The revealing part of Putin’s response was that Russia could not afford such a program.
Without being able to watch and understand the event, without knowing the history and the organization of these “forums”, you are playing somebody’s fool, Mr. Hamilton.
I’ll stop here; the article’s drivel seems to be without an end.
Can you write shorter, Mr. Hamilton? Can you write about what you do know? Can you check your facts? Now I have to doubt everything I have read from you — very regretfully.
(On Russia and Ukraine specifically: stay back. Leave them alone and things will settle as they are destined. There is no “better development” for you or me there.)
Like many people who comment anonymously on the Internet, you could profit by reading Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography. It is not long.
You make two very big mistakes. You assume that I am ignorant about the history of the Soviet Union and its depredations, and that I excuse the crimes that were committed by it under Communism.
I am knowledgeable about, and a harsh critic of both.
Anthony Hamilton, your articles are constantly of very high level. Both honest and informative.
I rarely comment, as I mostly read the articles with considerable delay, but I feel obliged to (finally) give you props.
Thank you. I greatly appreciate it.
There’s one big difference between Eastern Europe and the West: the people are much less prone to brainwashing.
I myself am part ‘Slav’ and part ‘Nordic’, grew up mainly in Belgium, and know both regions (East/West Eur) and their populations very well. There’s no doubt in my mind that both populations differ significantly in certain areas, and that those differences have a genetic basis. Groso modo:
– Nordics/Western Europeans: inborn self-discipline, eagerness to work/be productive, altruïstic, very concerned about social standing/what others think of them, high abstract intelligence, non-confrontational, socially relatively stiffled, terribly naive both socially and politically
– Slavs: relatively lazy, stoïc, confrontational, less concerned about how they’re socially perceived, higher verbal intelligence
etc…
The above is obviously a big generalization, but it’s really merely illustrative of the fact that there are considerable (biological) differences.
What matters here is the fact that Slavs are certainly less prone to be brainwashed by phony abstract principles like equality a.s., which seems also to be the case for many non-White populations like Blacks and Arabs. I am often absolutely baffled how some seemingly intelligent Nordics, for example professors, who display obvious brilliance in certain narrowly defined field, can be so incredibly naïve when it comes to macro-politics, as not even to notice obvious contradictions.
Also, Nordics are much more prone to be controlled by buzzwords, such as ‘racism’, ‘democracy’ etc. Their value judgement regarding these issues is much more attached to the words/labels as such, analogous to Pavlov’s dog.
That’s something one encounters much less with Slavs, who seem to be much closer to the immediate realities of our existence. I often pondered about the reason for that difference, and think that the thinking in both groups is just structured differently.
I disagree a little. I think what marks the farthest reaches of northwestern european man is a certain individualism, opposed to the community, and only willing to serve the community in what is perceived to be enlightened self-interest. And secondly a certain inquisitiveness, a quest to analyze, get to the bottom of things.
In this sense, european man is truly tragic. In the end, he is destined to be outbred, and thereby outcompeted, by groups that have a stronger communal ethic (jews, arabs, chinese, as examples), and he will fail in his quest to get to the bottom of things, because there is no bottom.
The obvious point is that before a Putin can form an alliance with white nationalists, there has to be a serious WN movement in existence. Such a WN movement would have to be able to mobilize political power, cash, agitprop, and people in the streets. But none appears to be in existence, at least not in the USA. Is it any wonder the Putins out there are looking elsewhere for allies?
Still…
The racialist movement in North America is utterly destitute and powerless, yet there isn’t a politician, cop, secret police agent, prosecutor, or judge anywhere who doesn’t seriously think white racialists pose a massive, hidden threat to the System.
The fear that the Establishment shows towards white nationalists just might mean something. The fear is all out of proportion to the apparent reality.
To use one small example: the swastika is being increasingly purged from the public view. This has gone as far as deleting decals from Luftwaffe plastic model kits. They sure weren’t doing that when I was a kid! But the further we go from 1945, the more Naziism must be brought to battle and defeated, so it seems. What’s the deal that today that any symbol of the Third Reich in particular or white people in general is being sent down the memory hole?
Maybe it’s the final consolidation of the multicult’s political power.
Maybe.
But maybe it’s because despite decades of Establishment propaganda and indoctrination and repression, there is a stratum of white nationalism just below the radar. Counter Currents frequently points out that the truth is with the racialist view of humanity. Things just may be waiting to break through. It might require the right leadership, or a WN movement which makes use of emerging information warfare tactics–or perhaps there is something deeper, metaphysical in the wings.
Regardless, this point bears more analysis.
Regarding the fear of white racialism in Western nations, there is a huge latent anger among the white populations in the increasingly multicult West. The regime knows this and they are rightfully fearful that one little leak in their anti-white damn will lead to more leaks and then a flood release of this anger.
The Sterling NBA story is an example of how the regime maintains control of the white populations as they are dispossessed in their own nations. The regime knows that there can be zero instances of any white person (in this case a jew but 90% of Americans don’t even know that), waving their nose at the political correct edicts related to race (or gender to a lesser extent), without being utterly DESTROYED.
Whites are like the kidnapped sailors on a British warship, kept in line through a system of intimidation and publicly administered punishments. The elites are more than happy to sacrifice one of their own to maintain this zero tolerance policy towards the race question. If whites were able to organize as whites for their own interests, the entire power structure of the West would collapse, because EVERY SINGLE one of their plans, programs and processes is harmful to white people. All of it. Throwing a Sterling under the bus is nothing compared to what they stand to lose once the average white person no longer fears being called a racist.
Once the first high profile articulate successful white person thumbs their nose at the PC racial commandments and SURVIVES the following gauntlet of liberal attacks and shaming, their game is OVER and they know it. They are indeed very fearful of even the slightest insubordination on the HMS White Genocide. Once it begins, the mutiny can’t be put back in the bottle.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.