1,875 Words
In a free society people should be free to make bad choices—within reason. Innocently enjoying a cigarette on your neighbor’s back patio during a Super Bowl party certainly qualifies as reasonable. If a person wants to risk dying of lung cancer in his mid-fifties, that’s his decision. Smoking is an example of a destructive and annoying habit, which, when practiced in the privacy of one’s home or in pre-designated public spaces, should not be banned. It perfectly demonstrates the leeway libertarians will allow a person to do something bad, as long as the only victim is the person himself.
But smokers do not form an identity group. Yes, smokers often do feel kinship and may draw comfort in having company when lighting up. But these are loose and temporary bonds. Furthermore, smoking tends to be a guilty pleasure. Most smokers know they shouldn’t smoke, yet do it anyway.
But what if smokers did form an identity group—a militant, self-righteous identity group? What would that look like? Well, they would protest loudly over non-smoking areas in public spaces. They would obnoxiously violate such areas—even to the point of being arrested. They would hold marches and other displays proudly exhibiting their smoking habit. They would constantly complain about anti-smoking discrimination through various forms of propaganda. They would proselytize to increase their numbers. And when their numbers became large enough, they would start suing businesses that ban smoking, offering legal protection for pro-smoking activists, and financially backing political candidates who will fight for smokers’ rights. In some cases, they may even physically intimidate anti-smokers and call for punitive measures against anyone who resists their agenda.
Then, if they’re ruthless enough, they would do everything possible to get children addicted to cigarettes, that way ensuring their group’s growth—something all identity groups must strive for. The fact that smoking is grossly unhealthy means nothing in comparison. And if a justifiably enraged smoker shoots up a hockey arena because his wife divorced him over his habit, well, that’s too bad. Maybe we as a society should reevaluate our anti-smoking bigotry and be a little more enlightened and tolerant over divergent lifestyles.
You see where I’m going with this, don’t you?
Under such circumstances, we would be perfectly justified in banning smoking because the victim becomes society, not just the smokers themselves. A pro-smoking identity group has no right to lead all of society off a demographic cliff in a gray, nicotine-infested haze, regardless of their personal freedoms. So if we can agree on banning smoking in such an alternate reality, there is no reason we should not ban transgenderism in our current reality—because transgenderism is what I was really writing about all along. And it is far worse than smoking.
You can order Alain de Benoist’s Against Liberalism here
For one, it’s permanent. Once you surgically change your sex, you can’t return to your original state. Yes, a person can do permanent damage to themselves if they smoke long enough. But this takes place over many years and effects some people differently than others. Bertrand Russell, for example, was an inveterate smoker yet lived into his nineties. Furthermore, people always have the option to quit smoking and mitigate the damage they do to themselves. Not so with transgenderism. And transgender regret is real.
Secondly, unlike smoking, transgenderism destroys a person’s ability to reproduce. It’s funny how the Left has no issue with sterilizing untold numbers of transsexuals with these complex procedures, while simultaneously clutching their pearls over eugenics from a century ago. At least eugenics, for all its flaws and abuses, had the goal of improving society through Darwinian selection—something that can be measured through psychometrics and crime statistics. What is the goal of transgenderism? Treating the amorphous and medically dubious condition of “gender dysphoria?” And studies suggest that it doesn’t even succeed at that.
In any event, if enough people become trans, then a society will not be able to reproduce itself. And that is a cliff much higher and steeper than the one smokers would lead us off of.
Third, it can be argued that transsexuals are mentally ill and that transgenderism is nothing more than surgical snake oil meant not as a curative, but as a way to make this particular mental illness socially acceptable. This, in turn, would encourage others to become transgender when they otherwise wouldn’t, thus growing the perverse transgender identity group. Obviously, this is galaxies apart from smoking.
With two mass shootings caused by transsexuals in the past week, it is tempting to describe them as especially likely to commit this sort of atrocity. There have been seven mass shootings caused by transsexuals in the United States and Canada since 2018. These include the following:
- February 2026, Pawtucket, Rhode Island: Robert Dorgan killed 2 (1 adult and 1 child) at a high school hockey game.
- February 2026, Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia: Jesse Van Rootselaar killed 8 (2 adults, 6 children) at a residence and at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School.
- August 2025, Minneapolis, Minnesota: Robert Westman killed 2 children at Annunciation Catholic Church and School.
- March 2023, Nashville, Tennessee: Audrey Hale killed 3 adults and 3 children at the Covenant School.
- November 2022, Colorado Springs, Colorado: Anderson Lee Aldrich killed 5 adults at a gay night club.
- May 2019, Highlands Ranch, Colorado: Alec McKinney killed 1 child at the STEM School.
- September 2018, Aberdeen, Maryland: Snochia Moseley killed 3 adults at a Rite Aid Warehouse.
With all the complexity surrounding mass shooting data, it’s easy enough to massage it to make transsexuals seem more or less bloodthirsty than they really are. For example, if one counts all mass shootings in North America—including inner-city, black-on-black and gang-related ones—then transgender shooters would be greatly underrepresented according to their proportion of the population (which one estimate has at 0.5%). Then again, according to The Violence Prevention Project, there have been 372 K-12 school shootings between 2000 and 2024. Within this timeframe, the two transgender school shootings above amount to almost exactly 0.5%. How about that? Yet, is it fair to include data going back to 2000 when transgenderism was much less prevalent than it is today? Arbitrarily going back one decade, there have been 214 school shootings since the start of 2016 according to the Violence Prevention Project. This puts transgender responsibility at 0.9%.
Then again (again), there have been 30 school shootings from 2000 to 2024 caused by what is known as an “active shooter,” (i.e., a lunatic who indiscriminately shoots up a place for no discernible reason) as opposed to belligerents who shoot known victims for cause. Of these 30, 17 occurred since 2016. So now your percentages rise to 6 or 11% depending upon how charitable or uncharitable you’re feeling towards transsexuals. And this is not counting the two transgender school shootings which occurred since 2024.
I bring all this up to show how murky it is to use mass shooting data to prove how hinged or unhinged transgender people really are. Here is a much clearer finding from 2023:
A new study from the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds that 81% of transgender adults in the U.S. have thought about suicide, 42% of transgender adults have attempted it, and 56% have engaged in non-suicidal self-injury over their lifetimes.
Now, there is a chicken-and-egg aspect to this issue. Are transgender people suicidal because they feel oppressed? Or do they feel oppressed because they are suicidal? The authors of the paper seems to feel that the answer is the former. And not only do transsexuals feel oppressed, but:
A lack of societal recognition and acceptance of gender identities outside of the binary of cisgender man or woman and increasing politically motivated attacks on transgender individuals, increase stigma and prejudice and related exposure to minority stress, which contributes to the high rates of substance use and suicidality we see among transgender people.
And this, of course, is why we need more gender-affirming care.
“Evidence-based interventions are needed to mitigate the risk of serious mental health outcomes among transgender people,” said lead author Jeremy D. Kidd, Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Columbia University. “This might include increasing access to gender-affirming care, or improving transgender community connectedness, which are related to lower rates of suicidality.”
The problem here is that in the 2020s, societal recognition and acceptance of transgenderism is at an all-time high. This study was published during the Biden administration when they were flying rainbow flags from government buildings and threatening parents for resisting the trans agenda. Thus, we should expect suicidal ideation and the like from transsexuals to go down during this time, not up. Yet it’s the other way around. It’s becomes a vicious cycle. Increased recognition and acceptance leads to greater suicidal ideation, which in turn requires more recognition and acceptance. Rinse and repeat. If the cause and effect described by Dr. Kidd above were true, then the appallingly high numbers listed in his study would have been much higher thirty years ago, when there was almost no recognition and acceptance of transgenderism at all. If so, then why didn’t the so-called transgender community wipe itself out in 2005?
Furthermore, if “societal recognition and acceptance” is a cure for suicidal ideation, does that mean that the opposite of “societal recognition and acceptance” is a cause for suicidal ideation? That seems to be what Kidd is implying here. And if he is, then he would have to explain why Jared Taylor, Greg Johnson, and Kevin MacDonald—and their thousands of dissident followers—aren’t also tempted to off themselves with Pepe-flavored Kool-Aid. The Dissident Right has its problems, no doubt. But threatening to morph into a hysterical Jonestown suicide cult because we’re exiled from mainstream America isn’t one of them.
Anyone who thinks they can cure suicidal ideation among transsexuals by showering them with recognition and acceptance—as well as plying them with hormones and cutting off their private parts—is not looking at the facts. Transsexuals who are fixated on suicide and self-harm are mentally ill—just like non-transexuals who are fixated on the same thing. If a person sincerely believes he’s Eleanor Roosevelt, we don’t pat him on the back and then perform plastic surgery on him until he resembles Eleanor Roosevelt, do we?
Since the Surgeon General declared that smoking was hazardous for your health in 1964, the anti-smoking pushback has been both powerful and popular. People recognized the dangers of smoking, and over time, began eschewing cigarettes. Of prime concern during this pushback was—and still is—protecting children. They are banned from buying cigarettes and—at least when I was a kid—are subject to anti-smoking propaganda. By targeting children in this way, the overall numbers of smokers over time could only shrink—which even many smokers would tell you is a good thing.
Because transgenderism is far worse than smoking, we should have a far stronger pushback against it to the point of banning it entirely. It’s more permanent than smoking, it’s dysgenic, and it enables mental illness. Further, because transgenderism forms an identity group, it must expand as all identity groups do. This means proselytizing among children. This means sabotaging the future of civilization. A libertarian might override his distaste for transgenderism for the sake of adults who can pay for their own transitions. But such respect for personal freedom is shortsighted, because any society that accepts and promotes transgenderism in the name of preventing suicide, will ultimately commit it.
55 comments
It is time to ban trangenderism. We must offer White people a better future. A better future cannot be one in which militantly insane perverts dominate and abuse normal people
Transgenderism is a psyop of the worst kind. As a once- and still- socialist millennial I watched it rear its ugly head within the last few decades, apparently from nowhere, but always pushed by very specific agents from strategically important hubs within online places of the liberal left and of youth. This is to me another obvious Talmudic conspiracy to destroy the left, the youth and society by extention, and one so preposterous and stupid I refuse even today to take it seriously, yet it’s grown beyond what I thought possible. There’s no logic to any of its ideology, and it’s even less logical that ascribing to it would automatically mean hating whites and embracing open borders. It just doesn’t follow, it makes zero sense, but that’s how this game is designed, to break children and funnel them into a lifelong state of psychosis and serfdom to Big Pharma. Much has been said about the rise of transgenderism coinciding with the aftermath of Occupy Wall Street, and its easy to see as a form of ritual humiliation of the anti-capitalists, smearing them in clown makeup and taking away their balls via chemical castration, a cruel and unusual punishment by those who wish to replace us.
I welcome the arrival of the trans goon (troon) as they are putting this insanity on full display, no longer hiding behind sob stories and platitudes. These are not your gays of yesteryear who bat their eyelashes on television pleading for social acceptance, these are a social class of permanently online Manchurian Candidates willing to engage in political violence at the drop of a hat. Since troons are so brainwashed into believing their own good that they will excuse any kind of behavior if it is expressed by a trans person, even pedophilia and murder, this is quickly turning them to death-worship. Their glorification of murder, as seen in the case of Charlie Kirk and the other victims of trans shooters, is deep, real and masturbatory among these people. Notice how a lot of these victims include children. This is terrible optics for them, but they’re too far gone to care; a slight against their odious world view means blood must flow. Since the vast majority of troons are on the anti-white spectrum of things, their downfall is ultimately good for us and for humanity, but is ultimately meaningless if we don’t understand where they came from and who orchestrated their rise as a political class. They are, after all, only a symptom of modernity, and the beast that animates it.
So true.
“But this takes place over many years and effects some people differently than others.*
This should be changed to “affects some people differently than others.”
But overall, this is a fantastic article.
There are some middle age and older people who have regretted becoming trans and having the surgery. They don’t get a lot of mainstream media coverage. A few of them are ant-trans activists.
Walt Heyer had the surgery to transition to a female. He lived as a woman for eight years. He mainly speaks to religious groups and churches.
Chris Beck is another individual who regretted being a male to female trans. I’ve mentioned him before. He is a retired navy seal and former seal team six member. He got a lot of press coverage when he decided to transition. Oprah and Dr Phil each had a show about his transition. He regrets the decision and has told people to disregard all the interviews that he gave while transitioning. He has only received a fraction of the media coverage he once got now that he has decided to detransition.
Chris Beck and Walt Heyer are unfortunate losers. Good for them to warn others about their experisnce. The Media will refuse to cover it, because it contradicts their pervert agenda and the Jews control the Media.
It’s unbelieveable that anyone could fall for such a obvious scam as transsexualism. A financial scam like that of Bernie Madoff or Sam Bankman-Fried – maybe. But not this! Not allowing a “doctor” to perform castration “surgery”, with lots of dangerous drugs. It’s suicidal. There is something fundamentally wrong with any society which tolerates transsexualism.
Sorry, posted wrong location.
🙂
I say bring back smoking. I grew up in a time where everyone smoked. When was the last time you saw a cigarette vending machine? They were fifty cents a pack. I don’t smoke now, but I consider what the government did to the great American tobacco industry was a disgrace of epic proportions. Just a massive money grab.
Couldn’t disagree more. I’m old enough that I remember when only Mormons and Seventh-Day Adventists didn’t indulge. And they were better off for it. Second-hand smoke was also a big deal too. Every old timer that I ever knew, dragging an oxygen tank around, said stuff like they started in the Army and that the best way to quit was never to have started. The Nazis were right to have discouraged smoking.
🙂
Bring back chain-smoking Jackie Gleason in The Toy where his spoiled brat White son buys a black guy and nobody made a stink back then just to see their heads explode now.
Cigarette vending machines used to be in a lot of restaurants. If I had to guess, I would assume that most of them wound up in landfills.
Trannies are mentally ill. You separate the mentally ill from the whole of society, and treat them. If the treatment does not work, you keep them separate for the time being.
You do not glorify mental illness. You do not make mental illness the norm of a society. You do not promote mental illness in media and movies.
It is that simple.
I think the trans movement has gone too far–children should not be exposed to this movement. I don’t have a problem with transvestites as they have always existed. As for hermaphroditism, I think corrective surgery should be an option if desired. The key word is dysphoria. If someone wants to go to drastic lengths and change their gender (as much as possible), then they need to try anti-depressants or anti-anxiety meds IMO.
Passive second-hand smoking is harmful. Pregnant women shouldn’t be allowed to smoke. Correct me if I’m wrong but Germany knew about the dangers of cigarettes for a long while and Hitler even banned women from smoking. But then again, NS care about the health of their people.
Just by existing the trans movement has gone too far.
Yeah, I know what you are saying. Even from my armchair I can figure out that you can’t change your chromosomes. I haven’t studied the origins of the movement. I know the daughter of the Prime Minister of Canada is “non-binary”, so it’s pretty widespread. I just assumed that Western medical science was trying to “fix” things with chemicals and surgery. That is wrong-headed.
Side note: smoking per se isn’t unhealthy, rather it’s the chemical additives in the cigarette paper. Tobacco nicotine is moderately healthy by boosting testerorone levels and decreasing dementia for elderly. Rolling your own cigs or even growing your own tobacco is fairly safe. Pipe smoking for example has a casualty rate of zero. Non filter cigs aren’t made much anymore, but usually have better paper.
As for being “annoying” cmon Spencer, smokers look cool aesthetically. Otherwise, good article
Utter nonsense. My Grandfather only rolled his own or smoked a pipe with Prince Albert in a can. He was a salt-of-the-Earth kind of outdoorsman and prospector and home builder, the type of Everyman that Woody Guthrie might have sung songs about. I remember him as a kind Grandfather who knew a lot of cool things, but he was practically a basket case of health problems. He died of a massive event while brewing a morning cup of camp coffee ─ long before his time, a couple of months before being able to collect his first Social Security check.
🙂
I mostly agree with you. Tobacco is a herb, a potential medicine, not necessarily a poison all the time. I recall reading that at one time in Japan (maybe still today?) any pregnant woman whose husband was much larger than she, risked having a too-large fetus and a difficult birth so she was prescribed cigarettes, which would decrease the growth rate of the fetus’ bones. Apparently tobacco is an accumulator of soil cadmium, which is antagonistic to calcium if I remember right. Also, schizophrenics are improved by smoking. It’s all about the dose, too.
Moderate or occasional smoking of naturally grown and processed cigs (American Spirit, e.g.) is probably harmless for most people, though some should never partake. Some people have a bad response to ginseng, too, or any other herb you can name. But if you are growing your own tobacco, be careful how you cure and process it. It can be poisonous if you don’t get it right. Which is why I decided to not grow my own.
Has anyone noticed how self-righteous people are against smokers? Jabbering away with condemnation whilst they suck back on their deceptively “healthy” artisanal wines. SMH.
I agree with the author. We must outlaw this nonsense in its entirety, even for consenting adults – even for Jews. Of course, Jews would fanatically resist any attempt to ban such loony idea as transsexualism.
Like all other perversions, transsexualism has been promoted mostly by Jews, from Magnus Hirschfeld and his so-called “Institute for Sexual Science” (sic) in Germany, to Jeffrey Epstein financing “research” to work on medical techniques to mutilate male child into a mock female. Jews think that’s funny. They make money from it. And it’s a great way to destroy the White race. This is another reason Jews and their tools want to suppress the Epstein files.
One thing that’s noteworthy about mtf shooter Robert Dorgan is that he had SS tattoos:
https://www.thetimes.com/imageserver/image/%2F8ef51c2d-0fc1-4d60-9fb3-8b94322b5fdb.jpg?crop=640%2C853%2C0%2C0&resize=618
This strikes me as yet another example of attention-seeking behavior on the part of a transsexual.
It also goes to show that, in modern America, NS symbols are more or less completely divorced from their historical meaning. It’s a bit like how Germans will have “Indianer” events where they dress up as American Indians. The people attracted to these things want attention.
Interesting. I recall that in the movie “Silence of the Lambs”, the psycho killer cross dresser Buffalo Bill was portrayed as a White nationalist. But it was done in a way that you had to be paying attention. He had a racist poster on a wall in his house.
Yeah, and that actor has now renounced his performance as being anti-trans.
And he was a jew. Michelle Pfeiffer should’ve gotten the Clarice role and kudos to the late Q Lazzarus for her hauntingly beautiful rendition of Goodbye Horses.
That was Ted Levine. Any relation to “Rachel” Levine? They sure look a lot alike.
Great article! I say we “smoke” the transgenders. 🙃
I don’t think we should be discussing transgenderism in any serious or intellectual manner. That only validates their wicked, anti White “concept”. Any discussion of transgenderism from our side should always be had in an unserious, mocking way going no deeper than “Chicks don’t have dicks” all the while treating the “concept” with the unabating contempt it deserves.
We should discuss transgenderism seriously as a form of enemy action.
You are completely right. This trans issue is a deadly psychological weapon of mass destruction that is growing like cancer. I am surprised by how few have effectively exploited the fact that Mark and Diana Carney have raised and publicly supported a tranny daughter, especially after globalist banker gangster Mark visited the province of B.C. in the wake of the latest tranny time-bomb school shooting to offer his phony condolences. This thing has gone way beyond niche sexual preference or sexual disorder. It is purposely weaponized.
We’ll never completely ban transmania, so long as there are trans billionaire$ ”’in high places.”’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Pritzker
According to Wikipedia, in the Early Life section: “Pritzker is Jewish.
I shocked that this freak happens to be of Jewish heritage.
Yep, & “s/he” is cousins with current Jewish Democrat Illinois Gov., JB Pritzker.
Why would you be shocked, do you consider jews to be morally superior to Whites? I have always thought that degenerate jews were financing, and promoting homosexuality, and transgenderism! 🙃
https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3154039/7-richest-transgender-millionaires-and-billionaire-ranked
My favorite is Marthine Rothblatt. Though Pritzker ‘s countenance is something to behold.
Also:
Martine Rothblatt – Wikipedia
Formerly Martin, but the bio doesn’t tell you that. The bio from a few years ago was more revealing about other things too.
You are correct.
“Bina Rothblatt is a prominent figure known for her relationship with Martine Rothblatt, who created the humanoid robot BINA48 modeled after her…”
I can easily see these characters deciding to grant robots/machines human rights. Dealing with evil & crazy makes grounded, skeptical people become more philosophic by necessity.
The book cover reminds me of the old pipe tobacco Dutch Masters. I have had conversations with trans women and they come in varying degrees of militancy. Some hate their current form and want permanent alterations. Others are more likely to be feminine gay men. Essentially harmless to society in general except for wasting the opportunity for procreation. It does seem that psychological problems are far more prevalent among them and it leads to very little tolerance from their part for dissenting opinions. Banned? I don’t know. I’m not big on banning anything. But I do believe in getting people treatment when they recognize the need.
I don’t read this as Spencer Quinn advocating banning people from cross dressing or claiming to be the opposite gender. I read it as banning the medical practice of surgically and chemically castrating people. I don’t think it is legal for a surgeon to needlessly amputate people’s limbs because someone wants to be handicapped. That surgeon would have his license revoked by the medical board and I’d assume go to jail. I don’t think anyone has a problem with banning THAT, do they? If someone wants to identify as a cripple, they can just go buy a wheel chair and play pretend.
100%
But then they would get the best parking spots? I do believe the doctors should be refusing these requests, but they are subject to the temptation of charging exorbitant fees to alter bodies. I think it’s unethical and should be subjected to shunning for enabling the damage. I still hesitate to ban much of anything unless it’s targeted towards our children. This should be the redline. I would bring back Joe Camel though. 😎
When I was ten or so, I was completely decked out in Camel gear. My dad was a Camel smoker and I collected the Camel Cash that came with a pack. I had Joe Camel hats, watches, shirts and even a duffel bag, and nobody had a problem with me wearing it at school.
“The book cover reminds me of the old pipe tobacco Dutch Masters.”
Good observation. Some of those 17th century types do look a little bit non-binary or ambiguous.
🙂
Here’s an ad from 1928:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/Dutch_Masters_cigar_ad_1928.jpg/500px-Dutch_Masters_cigar_ad_1928.jpg
I’d say that what we have here is a lot of very troubled, very suggestible people who’ve fallen into the hands of “therapists” who’ve swallowed this nonsense about being “born in the wrong body.” Kind of like “recovered memories.” Anybody remember those?
When this blows over, I anticipate an avalanche of lawsuits against surgeons, therapists and whoever else persuaded the victims of this mad idea to mutilate themselves.
That is what happened to Chris Beck who I have mentioned a couple of times. He wasn’t gay. He was basically a male cross-dresser; in other words, he liked to wear women’s clothing. He was also confused and had problems with anxiety. A female psychologist that was treating him convinced him that he was a woman in a man’s body and to have the surgery. Psychologists like that should face legal consequences. From what I’ve read, psychologists used to treat them by sending them to support groups and recommending that they don’t go out in public dressed as women. That way they would avoid negative attention and not be a distraction to others. Now they are demanding that everyone accept it. If I were going to use a starting point, it would be The Drag Queen Story Hour, where they attempted to indoctrinate children into this mindset.
I hope people can recognize the rhetorical opportunity here. A good chunk of liberals abhor smoking and fully support its suppression (cigarettes, not pot, oddly). If we can impress on them that transgenderism is worse than smoking, it will force them into the uncomfortable position of defending cracking down on one and not the other, especially when it comes to children. If enough liberals have to do this, I predict we can shave off a decent number of people from the trans train.
I see what you did there with the shave off quip.
And what’s with the furry thing these days? Humans are animals, but you can’t change your species. (Unless somewhere they are trying to create chimeras, hahaha.) You can’t change your racial dna (oh, I forgot, race is a social construct for liberals). Sexual identity is on a spectrum, but you can’t change your x or Y chromosomes. These are facts and I guess liberals don’t like facts.
As for tobacco, I am opposed to all of the harmful chemicals they add to it. The actual raw plant smells nice.
These are some very strange people.
The Failure of Rainfurrest – YouTube
Send in the Dr. Who daleks. Exterminate, exterminate!
This cultural rot runs deep and has affected different types of institutions such as K-12 and higher education. Quite often I cite examples in the military of this ridiculous trans mindset. These people should not be trained how to use military weapons and hardware. Recently, retired General McChrystal criticized President Trump for removing trans service members. He even attended a ceremony for five, trans service members who have been forced into retirement. I’ve mentioned him before because I find it ironic that he lied about Afghanistan and ran his mouth to a Rolling Stone reporter, which caused him to be relieved of his command. There is an article about it at npr.org. It’s titled Former top general calls military’s removal of trans troops a costly mistake.
Really, it’s pretty simple. If a guy thinks he’s a cat, that doesn’t make him a cat; it makes him delusional. (There are, in fact, people who think they’re cats. Then there are the “otherkin” – oh boy!) The concept is extensible, of course.
Then there are complicating factors. For some, it’s a strange sexual fetish. There are all the young people who were confused and listened to the wrong influencers. Then politics got into it. They hitched their wagon to the cultural Marxism train. Then this ridiculous thing became some sort of imperative that society must accommodate.
I can’t wait for a battalion of trial lawyers to go after people who misled all those kids.
Spencer: Unlike smoking, transgenderism destroys a person’s ability to reproduce…. if enough people become trans, then a society will not be able to reproduce itself…
—
If we’re speaking of White people, who constitute the subgroup of humanity we’re concerned with preserving, the National Alliance has not only effectively banned transgender freaks already by making them ineligible to join our organization or our community, but other freaks claiming to be so-called LQBT are also ineligible to join.
Being serious racial separatists/preservationists, ineligibility also goes for Jews and other non-Whites; those with non-White dependents, alcoholics, drug addicts, and others of low character. They have their own communities. We do not want them in ours.
Our eligibility requirements may seem mean to some at C-C, but NA members like it that way. We have to draw lines somewhere.
However, those Whites who are addicted to unhealthful tobacco can still be Alliance members, though that nasty habit is frowned upon for good reason.
I was curious about Cosmotheism and watched those introduction videos on your website a while back. Frankly it seemed very science and tech oriented which I found dry and beyond my comprehension. But I remember Dr.Pierce saying something about what was coming in the future was beyond race. It struck me as being related to transhumanism.
Gam: February 22, 2026 I was curious about Cosmotheism and watched those introduction videos on your website a while back. Frankly it seemed very science and tech oriented which I found dry and beyond my comprehension. But I remember Dr.Pierce saying something about what was coming in the future was beyond race. It struck me as being related to transhumanism.
—
Thanks for your interest, Gam. “transhumanism?” That’s a new one on me so I looked it up:
Transhumanism is a movement and philosophy that advocates for using advanced technology—such as AI, genetic engineering, and biotechnology—to fundamentally enhance human mental and physical capabilities. Its goal is to overcome limitations like disease, aging, and death, aiming to evolve humanity into a “posthuman”
Well, isn’t that nice? “Advanced technology such as AI”? no thanks. I’m interested in what the transhumanist has to say about the JQ. Do you know?
Sounds like philosophical double-talk to me. Cosmotheism can be considered advanced Pantheism, but for White “humans,” not for all humans or for “posthumans.” It’s the non-Semitic spiritual foundation for a new White preservationist Cause — biological but not “technical,” like I suppose transhumanism is. The word sounds too close to the word transsexualism for my tastes.
Perhaps Cosmotheism sounds “science oriented” to you because Pierce, a bonafide philosopher himself, a tenured professor of Physics, at 30, prior to dedicating his life to racial truths, interpreting the laws of Nature for Whites, as a scientist. See his speech “Our Cause” at nationalvanguard.org that he made to his followers 50 years ago! Nothing has changed since then except our race is 50 years closer to replacement by non-Whites and closer to eventual extinction.
…Now we need a philosophical and spiritual basis for our political struggle. A basis, of course, which tells us why we must fight and what we are fighting for. But we also want a basis which will tell us how to build a whole new world after we have won the political struggle. In other words, we are not building a basis to use for a month, or for a few years, but a basis which will last a thousand years and more. We are building a basis which will serve not only us, but also countless future generation of our race. And it is high time that we did this. We have drifted without any sense of direction, without any long-range perspectives, for far too long. It’s time that we stopped fixing our sights on next year, or the next election, and fix them instead on eternity…
Or, perhaps you’ll gain a better understanding of Cosmotheism from long-time National Alliance member and Cosmotheist Fred Streed’s explanation, here, “Fred Streed: A Cosmotheist Dialogue” at nationalvanguard.org
Q: Why doesn’t the Alliance stick with Christianity and try to reform it?
A: Superstition passed off as religion is not a real option. If it were reformed to the point where it did not violate the laws of Nature, or resort to spiritual terrorism, it would no longer be Christianity anyway. Christianity needs to be realistically scrutinized, not reformed.
Q: My interest in Cosmotheism, such as it is, is in understanding why Dr. Pierce believed it to be necessary.
A: It is necessary because it is reality. It is necessary because Whites have a strong need for purpose in life. That need gets subverted by superstitious claptrap like Christianity. Cosmotheism is an understanding that our lives are lived in this physical world, not some otherworldly, pie-in-the-sky-when-you-die foolishness. Our one purpose is to advance life.
Q: Cosmotheism is okay, but the name is ridiculous — Scientology-level ridiculous — but there’s a lot of good stuff there.
A: Dr. Pierce didn’t invent the name; it was already in use. Call it Pantheism or Panentheism if it bothers you that much. Or invent a new name. It will still be Cosmotheism by the accepted definition. Dr. Pierce also didn’t invent most of the concepts embodied in it. It’s more a discovery of what is true than an invention of anything. Some seem Hell-bent on the idea that Cosmotheism is some kind of cult religion. It’s not. Some evidently understand neither what it is nor its purpose. Others, I suspect, deliberately pretend it is a cult of made-up hokum like Scientology or Mormonism because they have an agenda of their own — and that agenda isn’t the preservation and advancement of the White race.
Cosmotheism defined, according to Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2d edition; 1934: “[cosmo-+-theism.] Ascription of divinity to the cosmos; identification of God with the world. Compare: PANTHEISM”
Q: Strictly speaking, Cosmotheism isn’t a religion, in much the same way as Buddhism — or ancestor-worship — devoid of folk beliefs and the like, isn’t a religion.
A: I would disagree with you there. I would say Cosmotheism is a true religion — and Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are not religions, but superstition operating under the cover of religion. I don’t know how many times I have had some Christian tell me to “look up on a starry night and then try to deny there is a God.” Truth is, I do experience a religious feeling of awe when I look at the Milky Way and reflect on the vastness of the Universe, the beauty, the grand scope of it all. But that doesn’t make me think there has to be some transcendent Hebraic spook behind it all. There is an irony in a Christian tapping into a bit of genuine religion to justify his Bible-based nonsense.
Cosmotheism is simply a religious world-view based on a scientific understanding of Nature, at least to the extent we do understand reality. Scientific advances that alter our understanding of reality also help us achieve the one Purpose of life, which is to advance to higher states of consciousness and understanding. That is what Cosmotheism is. Contrast that with the dogma of the Christian churches, which resists changes in our understanding.
Q: If you really want to find religious elements in the National Alliance, just look at the way Dr. Pierce is treated nowadays. He was probably the most significant person in American racial nationalist thought, and was a great leader (let’s face it, making intelligent and willful White folks pull together is about the hardest thing that a man can do), but where is the evolution of thought, and of the movement, that he started? It seems to have stopped when he died.
A: Nothing has stopped. His ideas are standing the test of time rather nicely. He is still widely read and quoted; his ideas still inspire.
Q: Where does the Jew fit into this Cosmotheist world view?
A: Life, at least life on this planet, as we all know, advances by becoming better adapted to its environment — it evolves new forms to take advantage of new or changed environments. Less adapted, less fit, life forms cannot compete, and are displaced and die out. Much environmental change has been random, a throw of the dice if you will, yet has served well to challenge and advance life to ever-higher states. The asteroid or comet that struck the Earth 65 million years ago and wiped out most of the then-existing species, including most or all of the dinosaurs, was one of those random events.
That event opened up ecological niches that had once been occupied by dinosaurs and other now-extinct animals. The small furry creatures who were the ancestors of all of today’s mammals — including us — were able to diversify and exploit those niches, something they could not do while they served as dinosaur food. There have been several of these “extinction events” in the half billion years or so since complex multicellular life began; the one that wiped out the dinosaurs being the most recent.
The point of all that is that advancement in the complexity and fitness of life came about as a result of competition and the overcoming of adversity. That is where the Jew comes into the picture. The Jew is destruction incarnate. He is parasitism and degeneracy and chaos, toxic to all life. He is self-selected for this role. His purpose is to winnow the chaff from the grain, metaphorically speaking. The Jew brings rot and decadence. His personality is toxic. This shows in the Jews’ preference for scatological humor, their championing of the sick, the weak, the base. But nowhere is it more clear than in their attacks on human sexuality, that most sacred of all our drives. The Jew poisons our reproductive urge with his promotion of homosexual sex, abortion, interracial sex, feminism, “gay” marriage, and endless further combinations of filth and degeneracy. He counters our art with anti-art, he counters our high culture with trash cinema and boob-tube debauchery, he counters our sacred genome with the promotion of mixing with Congoids and Mestizos.
At some level the Jew knows exactly what he is, subconsciously or consciously. That is why he is so extremely sensitive to any resistance to his destructiveness. It also explains his fascination with the “Holocaust” that didn’t happen. He is obsessed with the idea that some day he will be called to account for his depredations. He knows that truth cannot be covered up indefinitely and that justice cannot be evaded forever.
The Jew, of course, springs from the same Creator/universe as we do. His purpose is to weed out the weak and degenerate among us. That doesn’t mean he is not evil: If we understand evil to be anything that hinders the One Purpose, which is ever higher levels of consciousness, then he is indeed evil. He is an integral part of a duality that is actually different manifestations of the One, which is the all. The Jew exists for us to defeat. If we do not defeat him, we will die — and, in fact, will have proved ourselves unworthy of life. To fail at that task will consign our race to the grave forever, and probably will mean the extinction of life on this planet.
I included Fred’s straightforward dialog in our 260-page Bible, Cosmotheism: Religion of the Future. available here: https://cosmotheistchurch.org/product-category/books/our-titles/
Thank you for your response. I believe in evolution. I also agree that Christianity needs to be scrutinized, not reformed. I don’t know how the Jewish problem can be resolved when they already have an undisclosed number of nukes. Part of me thinks we have already lost the game, but it doesn’t hurt to remain engaged until it’s over.
Gam: February 22, 2026 Thank you for your response. I believe in evolution. I also agree that Christianity needs to be scrutinized, not reformed. I don’t know how the Jewish problem can be resolved when they already have an undisclosed number of nukes. Part of me thinks we have already lost the game, but it doesn’t hurt to remain engaged until it’s over.
—
You’re almost there, Gam, if you’ll remain engaged and consciously shitcan the defeatism.
I cannot explain Cosmotheism any better than what I provided from its founder and from devotee Fred Streed.
Our smartest people have scrutinized Jewish Christinsanity long enough. We don’t worship our racial enemy’s mythical tribal deity. Eliminate it; replace with something more suitable for our people, something our racial enemies cannot defeat.
When you discover a belief system more suitable for our race’s survival, advancement and preservation, let me know. I’ll quit promoting Cosmotheism and start promoting whatever you have found that will help us prevail against the Jew and other races.
As for the JQ , our people outnumber Jews 30:1, but almost all of our kinsmen are so thoroughly Judaized, asleep, and waiting to be awakened, aroused and organized — or, mostly not. That is a fact. Most of our people will perish. That’s just the way Nature works. Those subspecies that fight to preserve themselves stand a chance to live on, those who don’t won’t.
It’s irrational to fear Israeli nukes. Should they use ’em, their world finally crashes.
Why fear Jews? All they can do to you for exposing their perfidy truthfully is lock you up or kill you. They are not doing well with either if you’ll notice.
You can switch to wearing panties but you can’t change your genes.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.