1,092 words
I got lot of pushback last year when I declared that Donald Trump has always been the weakest link in the Trump movement. I am genuinely grateful for the good things that Trump has done. But recent events have only confirmed my judgment that he is a weak, foolish, and unprincipled man.
First, there are the California riots against immigration enforcement. Immigration is the most important issue facing America. Nothing else matters if America continues to decline into a non-white, anti-white dystopia. It is make or break, do or die, a matter of existence for the American people. We need mass deportations of illegal immigrants, then we need a general policy of remigration directed at non-whites who are here legally. Without this, it is only a matter of time before the Left gets back into power. The Left will then permanently crush any real opposition, and white genocide will kick into overdrive. That’s why millions of nonwhites were brought here in the first place: to establish a one-party Leftist state.
This is also an existential issue for Trump and everyone around him. If the Left gets back into power, Trump, his family, and people like J. D. Vance, Stephen Miller, and Elon Musk, will end up in prison or exile.
Given the stakes, Trump’s response has been astonishingly weak. He should have authorized the use of lethal force on Day One. Then there would not have been Day Two. Now protests (read “riots”) are planned for up to 2,000 locations around the country on Saturday, June 14th.
Trump can’t plead ignorance here. He was president on May 26, 2020, when the first George Floyd riot engulfed Minneapolis. Because the riot was not suppressed forcibly on Day One, protests and riots spread to more than 1,600 cities and towns in all fifty states. Between 19 and 25 people were killed, with up to two billion dollars damage to property and livelihoods. If on Day One, 15 rioters had been shot dead, it would have saved lives, homes, and livelihoods if it had quelled further violence.
The first night of riots is the fault of the rioters. Every subsequent night is the fault of Trump for being weak.
Second, while Los Angeles was burning over immigration enforcement, Trump took to Truth Social to emit an astonishing “Boomer post” on immigration:
This is a disaster, akin to Trump’s betrayal on immigration last year, when he declared that he was only concerned with deporting criminal illegal aliens, not the people who are somehow needed for the economy. Newsflash: all illegal aliens are criminals, because they broke the law to get here. Moreover, none of these aliens are “needed” by the US economy. Employers simply prefer to have them here, because they undercut American wages. It is laughable to suggest that people picking lettuce and changing sheets are irreplaceable. These are low-skilled jobs that anyone can do. The only thing employers fear is having to pay their workers more. If Trump is not going to enforce immigration laws for scabs undercutting American wages, then he might as well declare a mass amnesty right now.
Trump was elected on a nationalist and populist program. Assenting to mass illegal immigration in order to undercut American wages is neither nationalism nor populism. It is Republicanism at its foulest. This is a disgusting betrayal of the 77 million Americans who voted for Trump.
Fortunately, as with the H1B visa debate in December of 2024, there has been widespread pushback from the increasingly nationalist, populist, and openly racialist Right, including figures like Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk. Arguments formerly made on sites like Counter-Currents, VDare, and American Renaissance are now being echoed by Republican influencers with huge audiences. It never would have happened, however, without our movement and its platforms.
Last year’s betrayal was due to pressure from Elon Musk and big tech. This year’s betrayal seems to be due to pressure from agribusiness and the hotel industry. But America is not an economic zone. It is a nation, the homeland of the American people. Private enterprise is a fine thing. But whenever there is a conflict between business interests and the common good of the nation, the nation must always prevail. Until oligarchs begin to fear the wrath of the people, these betrayals will continue.
Third, Trump compounded his betrayal on immigration by announcing that he has agreed with China to allow up to 500,000 Chinese students to study at US Universities, a huge increase from the approximately 275,000 currently studying in America, in exchange for China exporting more magnets and rare-earth minerals. Apparently, Trump has come under pressure from the automotive and other industries to cut a deal.
This is another disastrous betrayal: even more white Americans will lose educational opportunities to the Chinese. Beyond that, many of Trump’s policies are being driven by the security threat of China. This deal simply exacerbates that threat. It prolongs American economic dependence on Chinese products while opening America to even more Chinese spies and saboteurs. Even setting aside the race-replacement angle, this is terrible.
All of this illustrates that the battle of ideas is not over. We must constantly rehash the basics of white identity politics to an ever-increasing audience of normies. Moreover, the establishment is out in full force to deflect people away from white identity politics into various color-blind globalist dead ends.
A case in point is the disgraceful performance of UK Reform Party politician Richard Tice, who when confronted with white demographic displacement in Britain tried every deflection in the book to avoid talking about the only essential group in Great Britain, the white people who constitute the English, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish peoples. Tice spoke of “British born” people, which of course can be of any race. He spoke of Britain as a “Christian nation,” but Christians can be of any race. And, when pressed on the issue, simply said that it isn’t his problem because he will be dead long before whites become a minority. It would disqualify any politician if he said he were indifferent to the extinction of a snail or salamander. It should be even more disqualifying for him to be indifferent to the extinction of his own race.
Relax Richard. We White Nationalists are playing a very long game. Things are breaking our way faster than I ever imagined, but remigration will take a very long time. Our white homelands will only be restored long after you are dead. So it is nothing to fear. Just golf, grill, and die snug in your bed. But don’t get in our way.
* * *
There are many ways to help, but the easiest is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.
You can explore all your donation options on our newly redesigned Donate page.
Thank you!
44 comments
“Trump was elected on a nationalist and populist program. Assenting to mass illegal immigration in order to undercut American wages is neither nationalism nor populism”
Up here in the 51st State undercutting wages is for amateurs. We go all the way. BC Ferries just signed a contract to have it’s next four ferries built in China. Tax payers money leaving the country, the loss of skilled jobs here, the lost opportunity for businesses to supply our decaying shipyards, the loss of tertiary jobs and so on . Trumps okay.
This is one of the best articles you’ve put out this year, Dr. Johnson. Hard-hitting, straightforward, and succinct.
Well said.
I think this categorization of Trump nicely complements what Greg wrote three days ago re Trump being a “big, beautiful narcissist”. So the Don will be utterly fearless and even foolhardy when his personal brand is at stake, but rather lukewarm when he feels that it’s not.
On a different note – and I apologize for getting rather esoteric now for a political topic – the timing of these scheduled nation-wide mass protests may have a special meaning from a Cabalistic perspective.
Let me unpack a bit: In order to understand what ideology and which group rules the western world, I started researching both the so-called “international bankers” and Freemasonry a couple of years ago. What came out of this research is that Freemasonry is based on Cabalism and that the international bankers have a specific ethnic background and (naturally) an even greater affinitiy for Cabalism. The Cabala of course is Hebrew mysticism, and revolves around the “power” of words as revealed by their numerical value (Gematria), certain “magical” practices and – and this is not widely known at all – also astrology [1].
In the late morning of June, the 15th EST, the planets Jupiter and Saturn will “square” each other as astrology buffs like to say i.e. stand at exactly 90 degrees from each other on the Zodiac. This only happens twice every 20 years and in a sense closes a period that began in 2020, when the two planets approached each other closely (culminating in the so-called “Great Conjunction” of December 21, 2020 [2]). There’s more to this “squaring” from an astrological perspective, making June the 15th a fairly special date to anyone who believes in astrology (as both Gentile Masons and Jews in power do), which is why I think it’s not unlikely that the day before this date was chosen for the largest mass protests in the US in quite a while.
I caution against drawing too conspiratorial conclusions from this possibility though. If correct, it would simply reveal the importance of the Cabala to current elites which would mean that they’re more superstitious/esoterically-minded than most people think.
[1] see the Sefer Yetzirah, and for deeper historical background the (unfortunately hardly known) topic of Biblical/Jewish Astrology:
https://www.bible-bridge.com/the-eyes-of-the-lord/
https://kockuvonstuckrad.com/downloads/download03.pdf
[2] https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/the-great-conjunction-of-jupiter-and-saturn/
It should be quite the cosmic day, what with the US Army celebrating its 250th Anniversary and it being Flag Day. Will see if the optic mongers get the anti-immigrant rabble to put down their Mexican Flags and instead wave Old Glory.
Good point! I believe Occultists seek the “synchronistic” confluence of as many different factors as possible.
Yesterday’s Israeli suprise attack on Iran probably also had such a background:
a) Jupiter entered what Chaldaean astrology called the “Silver Gate” on the 11th, so the 13th was inbetween Jupiter entering the Silver Gate and the Jupiter-Saturn square on the 15th. See: https://web.archive.org/web/20120404112614im_/http://www.musterion8.com/galacticalignmentandchrist/sgate.jpg
b) the 13th was the penultimate day before Jupiter-Saturn square
c) holy day of the Moslems (friday)
d) bad luck day of the Templars (they were arrested on friday, the 13th, October 1307)
e) Gematria value of the date (13.06.2025) means “Israel”: 13+6+20+25 = 64, while in Hebrew, “Israel” is written “Ishral” i.e. Yod-Shin-Resh-Aleph-Lamed = 10+21+20+1+12 = 64
I believe that high-ranking political and military people in Israel consult their Cabalists, and those do their math and assign each date a certain overall “score” based criteria like the above – and that score is dependent on there being as much important stuff going on as possible – and yesterday apparently fit the bill, as it was quite the confluence as you can see above.
Are you an expert on the occult? The reason I am asking is because I think we need an occult contributor on this site to review movies. For example, Stanley Kubrick’s, The Shining has been reviewed here, but I think it is lacking in in the occult interpretation. I have my own ideas about it, but I am no expert, nor do I want to be. Then there are all the David Lynch films. 🙃
Peter: On Youtube you can find a video essay called “The Shining, Stanley Kubrick And The Merchants Of Fear” by Wyatt Stagg. It’s from a White rather than an occult perspective. I take it that some think Stagg’s voice is sort of creepy but to me it just seems suitably ominous. In any event I think his piece on The Shining quite good.
Kubrick himself is open to an occult interpretation as Eyes Wide Shut amply demonstrates. For what it is worth Stephen King took the title The Shining from a Lennon lyric “we all shine on.” In the movie (released May 23 1980) Shelley Duvall’s character is shown reading The Catcher in the Rye and we all know how that book worked out for Lennon some months later.
I would be interested to know what your thoughts on The Shining Are.
No, I reluctantly became an expert on certain aspects of Cabalism to be able to understand the Masons. I find “Occultism” distasteful and inferior. What I am truly interested in is esoteric knowledge and understanding, and that constitutes a different domain than Occultism as far as I’m concerned.
Furthermore, when you really get into Greek mythology or Egyptian esotericism they’re so much more insightful and spiritually valuable than anything the Ca-ba-la and its deranged Occult offshoots have to offer!
My question was for Dominic Fox (he was crunching all those numbers), but I like your input. In The Shining it all boils down to the last scene where we are given a close-up of the photograph showing Jack Nicholson with his right arm up, and his left arm down—the pose of Baphomet. I think Stanley Kubrick was trying to tell us that we are ruled over by a (((power elite))) whom worship Baphomet. 🙃
The arm position you describe probably refers to the Hermetic maxim “As above, so below”. We see this embedded into, for example, the magician card of the Rider Waite Tarot: https://de.pinterest.com/pin/rider-waite-tarot-deck-en-2023–1130544312686930796/
Regarding Kubrick in general, what I can say is that:
a) he was really into the Cabala, particularly the astrological aspects thereof, and embedded some of that knowledge into 2001 – A Space Odyssey
b) he was no friend of the Right or of America’s white majority population, as the characters in Dr. Strangelove highlight
Regarding the elites, well, they don’t worship Baphomet – they worship JHVH and no other god (not surprizing, since the Cabala is essentially the “Mysteries of JHVH” and JHVH is the jealous god of monotheism). The idea that they would worship some sort of Pagan entity is almost entirely the product of Christian and Jewish imagination (more on the former: https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/counter-currents-radio-podcast-no-639/#comment-1856143).
Dominic: What Cabala did Kubrick put in 2001–A Space Odyssey?
I’m unfamiliar with this topic but the power of words as a form of dark manipulation magic is evidenced by all the classics of “racism, White supremacy, hate, antisemite, and holocaust denier”, though all have lost their intimidation power after a few trillion times of chronic overuse. Doesn’t sting like it used to.
Amen, and amen!
I like to think of Counter-Currents as a preview of what people like Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk will sound like five years from now.
I am not an extremist, I am a mainstream Republican from 2030.
I would prefer something catchier ─ something that captures Nationalist, Racialist, and Progressive (without the Marxism) leanings.
Hmmm, one thing that the term “National Socialist” (or Nazi if you prefer) has going for it is that it already has the raycism and the anti-Semitism baked into the cake and therefore hard to disavow.
This is necessary and vital because Jews as a wordwide movement always support race-mixing and undermining all nationalism except for Israel.
And as Hitler said in Mein Kampf on Zionism: it is always about the Diaspora, and nearly all of them will never live in Israel nor want to. Plus, any Nationalist or Rightwing movement will never be successful as long as Jews are either funding it or ensconced in its leadership positions.
Now, maybe someone can come up with a Krinklejammer with less baggage than the N-word that can scoot under the radar somehow, but that sort of defeats the purpose of bold activism that stakes the territory and then aspires to make it so.
I don’t have all the answers ─ but I hope that in the future we can find something better for White people than the Party of Lincoln.
🙂
I agree with you that we can do better than “Republican.”
Honestly, I don’t mind the term “fascist.” When we have dysgenic freaks running around calling themselves “antifascists” and declaring that everything healthy, orderly and wholesome is a form of fascism, the accusation sounds like a compliment.
In my opinion, we should also use the term mattoid more often to describe these dysgenic freaks. I’ve had normies and regular republicans ask me what that term means when I’ve used it. Without going into detail about it, I’ve explained to them that they are basically dysgenic freaks and spiteful mutants who are lashing out at society.
When we finally exit the dark rift out of this terrible time into sweet victory, we are changing both the name and flag of this horrid place. The stars and bars means nothing now except antiWhite, israel-only, and glorification of a most repulsive treason. The embarrassment of that 250th anniversary military parade didn’t help, either. If Gaul became France, what’s the successor to post-amerika?
The immigration policy regarding Homan simply reminds me of JE Hoover spitefully ensuring Charlie Chaplin lost his residency rights after doing a film promotion in the UK. Sooner or later he’ll be dragging Prince Harry out of Malibu muttering about Brits this and Brits that.
The irony.
king George III happily became great white father to the injuns on the borders of the white colonists. If anything Kings can be a curiously cosmopolitan force. In a Denmark they protected Dutch migrants from Danes who settled the Island just on the southern harbor of Copenhagen. The Kings also protected French immivasion into England after 1066. Kings like to be kings of diverse peoples too.
Yes, absolutely. Every king thinks there something even grander to aspire to: being a king of kings, an emperor, and that means their sense of prestige leads them to embrace conquest and diversity.
Although of course Kings can be connected to an ethnicity in such a real way that the King is the expression of the folk. Against emperors, would be kings of kings, popes, pirates, crooks etc. if the King is a Hobbesian Leviathan figure it’s all good. So “King” is a neutral term. “No Tyrants” would be a little more useful.
“If anything Kings can be a curiously cosmopolitan force.”
Theodore Roosevelt used the term Aristocratic Government rather than Kings but he agreed and put it this way:
“Nineteenth century democracy needs no more complete vindication for its existence than the fact that it kept for the White race the best portions of the New World’s surface, temperate America and Australia. Had these regions been under aristocratic government Chinese immigration would have been encouraged precisely as the slave trade is encouraged of necessity by any slave-holding oligarchy, and the results would have been far more fatal to the White race. But the democracy, with the clear instincts of race selfishness, saw the race foe and kept out the dangerous alien. The presence of the Negro in our Southern states is a legacy from a time when we were ruled by a transoceanic aristocracy. The whole civilization of the future owes a debt of gratitude far greater than words can express to that new democratic polity which kept the New World as a priceless heritage for White people. ”
I checked out that video on YouTube that you recommended. What a load of dog shit (and that’s an insult to dog shit) it is; it is nothing but white bashing tripe; I watched about two minutes, and quit in disgust. I am only interested in an interpretation that indicts the jew. Thanks anyway. 🙃
Peter: That’s not what I took from it at all. Sorry you did not like it.
The Plantocracy were not aristocrats. They were slave drivers. Mostly common. The American republic proved fatally vulnerable to diversity. Roosevelt may have been right up to his point, but he was not correct 100 years later. Kings can be a driver of diversity but they can be useful vehicles for re-establishing independence in a sovereign People. Rome got rid of Kings and re created itself as a Republic-citizenship processing Center that spread like a cancer.
” If anything Kings can be a curiously cosmopolitan force. In a Denmark they protected Dutch migrants from Danes who settled the Island just on the southern harbor of Copenhagen.”
It’s funny you should mention that, I have actually used that very example, to demonstrate that even in the best of cases immigration is going to be cause hardship to the natives. But there are some things that should be considered here; At the end of the 1200s, Denmark begins lagging behind what is now Northern Germany and the Netherlands, and a good deal of the efforts of the Kings of Denmark in the 15- and 1600s were different ways of trying to catch up. Christian II brought the Dutch in for a very specific reason, namely to bring with them more advanced agricultural techniques. Supposedly he wanted to the Dutch settlement to be a kind of ‘open air demonstration’ of what could be accomplished by the reforms he intended to enact across the entire realm, if he had not been deposed. At any rate I am sure that none of those facts did much to comfort the Danes who were displaced to make room for the incoming Dutchmen. But the Dutch weren’t just brought in for the sake of diversity.
“The Kings also protected French immivasion into England after 1066.”
It’s probably worth mentioning there, that the kings who protected the French immivasion were themselves part of the immivasion. I don’t think you can reasonably find fault with Norman kings securing their power in a newly conquered, hostile land, by installing their own countrymen as holders of power. I am not saying that the Norman invasion wasn’t a complete disaster for the English people -as far as I can see it certainly was, but it’s not like Harold Godwinson woke up one day and decided to replace the entire aristocracy just because he wanted to be a “king of diverse peoples too.”
The French as opposed to strictly speaking the Norman Barons and their host of knights though? I’m related to Adam DeBertholet who was the first invader to be granted land by William. Perhaps this missed the point though. And of course Harold was trying to defend his own kin and folk from Norman predation. He’d just fought off Hardrada and his own bro Tostig.
back to the point…A great deal of ordinary French moved into London in the decade and century well after the Normans arrived. It was an immivasion by that point. The Angevins were more thoroughly colonising England than the Normans, who decapitated the Aristocracy and garrisoned their castles. Later the Kings were favouring foreigners over the natives at many points. Though we’re not strictly speaking about the Gens Normans themselves when we discuss Ze French. This is a pretty complex topic but it does indicate that Kingship drifts around various concepts as you have good and bad kings. kings that lose and kings who win. Kings who protect their own people and kings who seek out the exotic.
Back about fifteen or so years ago when the Reconquistas were protesting in Arizona, which was kicking off the modern anti-immigration movement, the protesters looked just like the viral photo of the shirtless Chollo waving the Mexican flag from the recent riots in L.A. with the “unrest” in the background.
With the rise of WN militia movements and retired and rapidly-passing Seniors as a votng bloc dedicated to protecting the Saguaro state and its sacred borders, the Communist PR department knew that they needed to rebrand their image.
So the Reconquista handlers then had the protestors fly the American flag and selling margaritas and hot dogs on the street instead of putas and molotov cocktails, and the Democrat politicians now talked about “uniting families” and so forth.
Some anti-immigration laws were passed on both state and federal levels, and some border enforcement done, but some of the key loopholes applied to businesses, who were positioned for passive non-compliance to protect their blessed cheap labor.
So employers now had to check identification and papers to fill out I-9 forms and it had to be an official weasel in the HR department or under the rubber stamp of the corporate general counsel. And there was also an e-verify form to streamline and check the documentation, but little teeth in the matter was manifest when things slipped through the gates. If Paco wasn’t actually a drug trafficker, then not much got done.
All that would have been required was some sharper teeth aimed against the GOP businesses wanting the cheap labor and the Democrat operatives wanting the Third World voters.
I agree that Trump should have acted more decisively calling out the National Guard and the Marines for the rioting in Los Angeles. Nobody credibly believes that his actions were “provocative” and inciteful compared to doing nothing, and neither Gov. Newsom nor the municipal Negress opposing this deployment of troops have any credibility whatsoever as their streets burned.
Yes, it is time for Trump to double down. He was elected twice on an anti-immigration platform that remains popular in Red States. He is not a young man; he can’t run for reelection and has nothing to lose.
🙂
Down with the peasant and down with the merchant, let the petty “anarchist’s” neck meet with the Arch-anarch…the sword. We NEED Kings and Heroes.
Good piece. Although I saw good signs early on, I feared this would happen, that the second there’s a test of Trump you’d get a rerun of Trump 1 and all of that bs. All you’re left with is bluster, hot air, useless conservative symposiums by that pillow guy and a plate of empty nonsense. Nothing.
Trump’s way out the latest left chimpouts seems to be to hope to make some ‘conservative’ economic case. And unfortunately Trump hasn’t learned the left smell blood at that point. The best you can say is these riots remind everyone of what’s going on and reality, the fault lines and the totally fake society people live in.
Trump isn’t getting younger, he should just have gone all out and gone down as doing everything he could.
“This is also an existential issue for Trump and everyone around him. If the Left gets back into power, Trump, his family, and people like J. D. Vance, Stephen Miller, and Elon Musk, will end up in prison or exile.”
I genuinely believe that. Possibly as early as 2028, there will be a Democrat or “centrist” Republican back in the White House. When that happens, they are not going to wish Trump a happy retirement at Mar-a-Lago. He will need to think seriously about putting his entire family on a plane to a country with no extradition treaty with the U.S. The Left doesn’t just want him out of office, they want him in prison, or dead.
I believe that’s why Elon jumped on the Trump train – he knew that if Trump lost he’d be put down.
Trump always wants to please everyone so they’ll view him as A Great Guy but that just means he has no true convictions and his promises change depending on who’s in the room with him (and to Hell with the people who put him into that room…)
I have to be among the first to admit, that Truth Social tweet really deflated me. While lettuce pickers and sheet changers are not as threatening to me as Pajeet “engineers” and the Indian Patel hotel cartel that owns 40% of the industry in the US, Trump would be wise to not so flippantly dismiss the voters in favor of the oligarchs in those industries.
Here’s a perfectly sensible solution: Create a “seasonal foreign worker visa” program that allows low skilled laborers from Mexico to live in employer furnished labor camps, where they have access to the essentials (clean water, electricity, three hots and a cot) and allow them to pay whatever wage these people are willing to work for, but have this program be directly overseen by ICE, with ICE agents in charge of keeping a daily track on every last one of them. For this, the transient workers are permitted to work for so many months at a time and then busses drive them to the border to return to their homes with their earnings.
No citizenship, no integration with our society, no car accidents with aliens who have no car insurance. Everything completely controlled by an agency that manages the movement and accommodations for these people, (read foreign contractors) but whose purpose is also to keep them segregated from our society.
To a thinking person, I don’t think anyone can say there is anything morally wrong with this, if those Mexicans are entering into a contract where they understand the rules. I enlisted in the Armed Forces when I was 20 years old, and I understood that I was giving up my rights to be “owned” by Uncle Sam during my enlistment, and when it was over there would be a tangible benefit (skills that I learned, experience). For these Mexicans, there is a benefit to having money to bring back to Mexico every few months to give to their families. If a contractual military enlistment isn’t immoral, than such contractual transient labor from foreigners shouldn’t be considered immoral either, as long as it is voluntary.
But this will never fly, because our modern morality is completely effeminate and all practicalities be damned.
Your idea sounds like the bracero program negotiated between Mexico and the US in the 1940s, 50s, and early 60s. I just read about it in the excellent book Operation Wetback by Juan Ramon Garcia (Greenwood Press, 1980). Despite his mestizo name, Garcia showed very little if at all antiwhiteness or anti-Americanness. His main criticism of Operation Wetback is that the INS claimed to have deported almost a million Mexicans in just three months. Garcia says these numbers seem to be rough estimates, if not fantasies, not backed up by documentation, and that the real number of deportations was much lower. So many interesting things in that book, not the least of which is that if any American in the Southwest during that time had been publicly against having Mexican farmworkers instead of American ones, he would be viciously accused by the powerful growers via the papers they owned of being a Communist and unpatriotic!
Agree, sadly, that Mr Trump is the worst imaginable ambassador for his own movement. If I were his chief of staff my absolute first order of business would be to take away his dammed phone, banish him from social media, and forbid him to make public statements unless carefully vetted by me or his press secretary first.
Strongly and emphatically disagree that he should have violently quelled the riots. Why would he want his fingerprints on the deaths and injuries of all the honor students, aspiring rappers, future astronauts, good boys who were turning their lives around, hardworking family men, and college students with bright futures and smiles that could light up a room?
Better to repeatedly and clearly offer federal help to the governors of those states, but make it clear that you need their permission to get involved, and that if they refuse federal assistance that is their prerogative. How about a brief nightly press conference addressing the rioting and subsequent damage and loss of life, ending each night with a heartfelt offer to send federal assets, a reminder that you need permission to do so, and a firm reminder that so far your involvement has been rebuffed? Let reporters shove microphones into Mr Newsome’s face asking why he is letting his cities burn instead of accepting help?
Chess, not checkers.
Sorry, but the reason we have a chief executive is to be the guy who puts his fingerprints on orders to quell riots with violence. The idea that he would not get involved and just use this as an opportunity to grandstand and own the libts is, frankly, an abdication of responsibility to low partisan points scoring. Basically what he is doing now on social media.
If the media were not rabidly partisan anti-American anti-White zealots, if the Democrats weren’t the same, perhaps I’d agree. But gunning down D’Ontavious and Hector because they are looting a fucking Nike outlet is bad optics and bad politics. You call my idea “owning the libs”. I call it forcing the libs to own their failed policies and the devastation that follows. Newsome is a loathsome, coiffed insect who has gotten a free pass for far too long. Putting him in a vise, forced to very publically choose between siding with Trump or siding with arsonists, might hasten his political demise and usher in a more moderate and competent state government.
You make a fair point ─ an excellent point ─ but we remember Chief Executives for their decisiveness and (bloodthirsty) conviction and not necessarily for their oratory and equivocation.
With the 2020 elections near, I assumed that Mr. Trump did nothing during the Summer of St. Floyd because he correctly sensed a trap, with the corporate news media in full and eager compliance ─ like a Watergate scandal on steroids. Now I wish that Trump had “seen the elephant” and acted (very) decisively against the mob.
I’m no fan of Mr. Lincoln, but he understood that you could not just keep kicking the can down the road indefinitely.
🙂
Awesome take; nothing extra nothing missing
…the Chinese alienated some of them by stealing their intellectual property, and in so doing, prevented them from cashing in on the labor arbitrage globalization promised. If that wrinkle is ironed out, Trump will have no plutocrat allies at all and that will be the end of him.
I think there’s a lot of truth to this.
The Chinese are blatantly copying everything from electric car designs to medical devices, and it’s definitely irritating Western elites. It’s not an American example, but both of China’s top electric car manufacturers – BYD and Xiaomi – copied the Porsche Taycan. Now Porsche is shutting down 30% of Chinese dealerships and considering a full phase out.
This is also an existential issue for Trump and everyone around him. If the Left gets back into power, Trump, his family, and people like J. D. Vance, Stephen Miller, and Elon Musk, will end up in prison or exile
I think they might go after both his core circle and, in some cases, even those who are “peripheral” to him. I’ve seen Leftists post memes about arresting RFK Jr. I don’t exactly know why they’re mad at him, other than the fact that he supports Trump, although I did notice that the European media went after him quite aggressively when he shared his thoughts on chemtrail conspiracies.
Very good article, Greg. the US is too far gone for Trump to do anything about it with his weak measures that protect racial aliens in our living space: whether wanting more Chinese students in our midst or non-White farm workers and those making beds and cleaning rooms in the so-called great hotel and leisure businesses, etc. — none of whom who can make White babies.
What to do? What to do?
THINK RACIALLY – ACT LOCALLY Control what we can, not what we cannot.
Our great farms do not need to feed the world, dependent upon non-White migrants who no longer migrate seasonally. They stay. Pull back from that. Whites need only feed ourselves like we’ve always managed to do. We can make our own beds and clean our own rooms like we’ve also somehow always managed to do for centuries before joining the multiracial global plantation.
We will have to give up a lot of leisure we’ve become accustomed to and take care of our own, or go the way of formally White southern Africa.
Separating our race from others to preserve our own, long-term, will not be easy in this increasingly complicated world, but strict racial separation will be necessary.
—
Scott: June 14, 2025 [O]ne thing that “National Socialist” has going for it is that it already has the raycism and the anti-Semitism baked into the cake and therefore hard to disavow… Jews as a wordwide movement always support race-mixing and undermining all nationalism except for Israel.
[I]t is always about the Diaspora, and nearly all of them will never live in Israel nor want to. Plus, any Nationalist or Rightwing movement will never be successful as long as Jews are either funding it or ensconced in its leadership positions.
—
Exactly.
“Peace president” Trump, Zionist-in-Chief, giving the green light to bomb the shit out of Teheran for the Tribe he puts ahead of his own race, causing mass evacuation, should bring the needed reality check to White America if she could only open her eyes, but she can’t. She’s terminally divided and conquered already. Trump only makes things worse.
Iranians do not control mass media (thus the mass mind) in America any more than dispossessed Palestinians do. Jewish diaspora, whose interests Trump puts first, do. Try to disavoy irrefuatable facts of that, provided here: “Who Rules America 2010” at nationalvanguard.org. Upgrading and revising that powerful expose is a priority project for our side.
The question that should be on the lips of every White American: why must the Jew aka Israel have a nuclear arsonal for decades now and its Middle-Eastern neighbor must not?
It is not just Trump and his Zionist crew that protect Israel and the powerful supremacist Jew diaspora, but controlled media and every federal legislator in both the Democrat and Republican parties. None of them! Cowardly politicians. They cannot ask that simple question and still expect to win their next election. Jewry will see to that as they control the mass democratic electoral process. Fact! We must pull back, withdraw our consent to be governed by that broken system if we are to be serious about preservation of our race.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.