Maniac
Psychotic Joker Antecedent Probes the Unsettling Line Between Romance & Murder
Jason Kessler
A recent viewing of the 2012 movie Maniac remake made me question the unsettling parallels between a man hunting for love and one hunting with murderous intent.
The film is very good if you like a giallo slasher in the style of Dario Argento. Producer of both versions, William Lustig, even worked on the Italian master’s excellent Tenebrae. Both versions are about a psychopath with mother issues who murders women and staples their scalps onto his collection of mannequins.
The unique element in the remake was portraying most of the film through the point of view of the serial killer, played by Elijah Wood. With a few exceptions, he’s mostly only visible in mirrors throughout. This aesthetic, forcing the viewer to imagine themselves as the killer, elevates it beyond genre exploitation. Maniac becomes an exploration of the frustrated and perverse sexual impulses of the antagonist and the tragic (albeit somewhat unrealistic) love story at its core. In fact, this version of the film was even screened out of competition at Cannes.
The P.O.V. in film is a very context dependent tool. A cinematographer could evoke gritty realism of the “male gaze” by panning the camera to follow a woman. Are we watching a horror film with the knowledge that some of these women are future victims? Or are we watching a testosterone fueled Miami Vice-style crime noir boastfully showing off the sex of the city?
One of the interesting thoughts that this film provokes is the overlap between the hunt of the serial killer and the normal seduction. When a man sees an attractive woman, he begins tracking her internally, perhaps strategizing whether and how to woo her. She may not welcome his advance, unless she knows he is extraordinarily chariosmatic, attractive, rich, popular, etc.
This means the average-to-below-average man must consciously be willing to transgress her personal boundary. This is why some modern men do not approach women at all: there will never come an ideal situation in which a woman “invites” the man to seduce her. In a society obsessed with microaggressions, some polite men would rather remain silent and alone than risk offense.
In the approach he may scare her, embarrass her, or disgust her and yet he must be prepared to subject her to these things if he doesn’t want to become the perpetual “invisible man.” Not only that, but he must risk the condemnation of onlookers who may judge him as inept or creepy if his well-intentioned come-on misses its mark. The anxious male may look around to see if the coast is clear, like one about to engage in a criminal act.
Whether the man is a movie serial killer or an innocent looking for romance he must play the predator to her prey, in the sense that he must hunt and be willing to harm, even if it is only by being an annoyance. A further parallel is how gazing at a beautiful woman even a second too long can provoked in her a fear response, establishing the natural hierarchy of male physical dominance over the feminine. Any man can be a physical threat to any woman, and not the other way around. Part of the fascination of the serial killer fiction is in how the deranged individual refuses to avert his gaze but actively stalks his prey, how he not only doesn’t care about offending her but neither about explosive acts of violence.
The enduring popularity of these psycho-sexual slasher films exists at least partially due to men and women enjoying a space in which they can experience the fear of going or being taken beyond the boundaries of the normal rules of seduction. In Nietzschean terms, the slave morality of the good man will always cause him to question whether he has gone “too far.” The woman is caught between neglect of the man who doesn’t go far enough and fear of the man who goes too far. Perhaps there is catharsis in giving into our worst fears in the safety of a cinema.
This film is a remake of Maniac (1980) starring Joe Spinell, a bit actor who plays supporting roles in several huge films in the 1970s like Rocky, Taxi Driver, and The Godfather I and II. The original film used the traditional 3rd person point of view but has many of the same narrative beats as the remake, until some substantive changes in the final act. Both versions feature antagonist Frank Zito, developing a relationship with an attractive photographer in the midst of his psycho-sexual killing spree. However, Elijah Wood is more believable in this situation since Spinell, by contrast, was old, overweight, greasy and acne scarred.
My primary criticism of both versions is that it’s hard to suspend disbelief at the forwardness of the women towards the deranged psychopaths. For instance, one of female victims in the remake begs Frank, under the pseudonym of “TimidMan” on an online dating site, to not be so shy and send her a photo (since his profile didn’t have one). In real life, no woman would give a thought or response to a profile without a picture.
Despite thematic similarities to the so-called “incel film” Joker (and Taxi Driver besides), Frank is not an incel. Two attractive women are bizarrely into him. Yet there is still the through-line of the quiet, loner struggling to contain volcanic emotional impulses within until they explode all over the screen.
Anna, the “last girl,” is friendly and flirtatious with shy Frank when they meet in his mannequin restoration shop. She goes on dates with him: to watch The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and a romantic stroll through the park, despite having a boyfriend. When Frank arrives at the art gallery where Anna is featuring an exposition of her mannequin photography, Anna dismisses herself from her boyfriend to assertively greet him with welcoming eye contact. In a real world situation, a quiet man who stands alone without initiating conversation would be viewed at best as an awkward loser and, at worst, a creep.
I was shocked that the actor cast to play the boyfriend of beautiful blonde Anna was a black man. Although the boyfriend is a jerk and we do not empathize with him, it creates a bit of a troubling subtext about the quiet white boy being a secret psycho when, in reality, black men are much more likely to commit domestic violence against women. The unfortunate casting choice introduces a distracting, and hopefully unintentional, racial theme which detracts from the whole. Yet he is a minor character with few scenes.
Overall, if you’re a cinephile who gets down with blood and guts horror, you’ll like this one. The changes that this film makes stylistically and thematically, make it a stronger film than the original, a rare, if not unprecedented, feat for a remake.
Jason Kessler is the author of Charlottesville and the Death of Free Speech, available now from Dissident Press. Follow him on Telegram, Twitter, Odysee, and Gab. Also follow Dissident Press on Twitter/X. We follow you back!
Maniac%0APsychotic%20Joker%20Antecedent%20Probes%20the%20Unsettling%20Line%20Between%20Romance%20andamp%3B%20Murder%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
American Caesar: Trumpism in the Eternal Cycle of European Politics
-
They Don’t Make ‘Em Like They Used To: Part Two
-
The Dead Don’t Give a Damn: Elem Klimov’s Come and See
-
Of Pure Blood
-
Woody Allen Without Woody Allen, II: Blue Jasmine and Coup de Chance
-
Muad’Dib Shrugged: In a Year of Bad Movies, Francis Ford Coppola Says: “Hold My Beer.”
-
King Arthur: Knights, Action, and Colonization
-
Woody Allen Without Woody Allen: Midnight in Paris & Vicky Cristina Barcelona
7 comments
What a weird coincidence. My friend and I watched The Last Horror Film last night, starring both Joe Spinell and Caroline Munro from the original Maniac. After watching it, I was reading about this remake and thought it actually sounds worth while, which is rare for me when it comes to more recent remakes of classic horror films. I will give it a watch.
Fun fact. Joe Spinell was one of the highest paid actors from the original The Godfather. He only had a bit part, but he made a deal with Francis Ford Coppola that he would work throughout the entire filming of the movie on any and every aspect of work behind the scenes, for which he was paid the daily actor rate even if not appearing in the day’s scenes. Until his untimely death in 1989, he was receiving huge royalty checks.
Sometimes the bit actors in supporting roles can be very fascinating.
I have a more European mentality than American in a lot of ways, including in niche area of film casting.
Of course, we like to look at beautiful people but the European cinematic willingness to cast imperfect looking actors in lead roles to this day makes for a wider, more realistic, range of expression.
Maniac (1980) was from a era where normal looking people, with flaws, could be actors, rock stars, etc based on their talent.
Spinell, of course, even then was not handsome enough to be the lead in anything but horror films. Yet, his unique machismo obviously made him a beloved yeoman to many of the best filmmakers of all time.
I have to respectfully disagree with Mr. Kessler regarding the remake being better than the original. The remake felt a little too…I dunno, gimmicky or something. It was an entertaining slasher flick, sure, but while watching it, I never forgot that I was watching a slick, Hollywood production. The 1980 version had that 70s style grittiness that made you feel like you might be watching an actual snuff film. And Spinelli’s lack of physical appeal amplified that to a large degree—plus his eyes have an undeniably creepy (an overused term, to be sure, but one that definitely applies here) and psychotic glare to them.
I get where you’re coming from. The retro shoestring look has an authenticity for sure.
And you have to credit the original for bringing most of the ideas to the table. I just feel like the remake took those ideas and fleshed them out in a substantial way.
woles togel woles togel woles togel
My spouse and I stumbled over here from a different page and thought I might as well check things out.
I like what I see so now i’m following you.
Look forward to checking out your web page repeatedly.
Glad you enjoyed it, bud!
I haven’t seen the remake but I’ve always liked the original Maniac. Genuinely creepy and suspenseful.
(youtube.com)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p96Pr5M7O4A
I’m a huge fan of character actor Joe Spinell who gave memorable performances in some of the best films of the 70s and 80s, including five with his friend Sly Stallone.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.