2,023 words
Donald Trump addresses the Israeli-American Council in Washington, DC on Thursday, September 19 (screen capture).
Five days after this electoral campaign’s second bungled attempt on his life, Donald Trump—who to my knowledge has yet to address white Americans by name as a voting bloc—spoke before the Israeli-American Council in Washington, DC.
After being introduced by Miriam Adelson (born Miriam Farbstein 78 years ago in Tel Aviv), the widow of mega-billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, Trump palavered for 45 minutes about Israel, America, America’s relationship to Israel, Israel’s importance to America, and the urgent need to snuff out anti-Semitism’s stubborn fires wherever they appear—which, for some baffling reason, is everywhere, at all times, throughout history and into the present…but hopefully not into the future, at least not if he has anything to do with it.
Audio version: To listen in a player, use the one below or click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link/target as.”
About ten minutes in, he said it was Israel’s responsibility to defeat his super-cunty multiracial archnemesis Kamala Harris:
Israel has to defeat her. I really believe that it’s a disaster for Israel…. We’re going to take back our country, and we’re going to make Israel great again, and we’re going to make America great again…. We’ve gathered today to talk about the scourge of anti-Semitism. Tonight, we’re two weeks away from the one-year anniversary of the worst attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust, without question. On October 7th, which would have never happened if I was president, by the way, I have to always preface it by saying it would have never, ever happened. Innocent men, women, children, and babies were tortured, maimed, kidnapped, and killed.
Toward the end, Trump said he’d seen a poll that claimed he was only snagging 40 percent of Jewish Americans’ votes:
That means you got 60 percent voting for somebody that hates Israel…. Forty percent is not acceptable because we have an election to win.… I’m not going to call this as a prediction, but in my opinion, the Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss if I’m at 40 percent…. The Democrats are bad to Israel — very bad….
But if we don’t win this election, Israel, in my opinion, within a period of two to three years will cease to exist. It’s going to be wiped out. That’s what’s going to happen…. And you have 60 percent of the Jewish people essentially voting for them. If I do win, Israel will be safe and secure, and we will stop the toxic poison of anti-Semitism from spreading all over America and all over the world. We’ll get it stopped…. They did a poll in Israel. I’m, like, at 99 percent favorable. I could run for — right now, I could run for any office in Israel…. Everybody loves me. I could run for Prime Minister.
Anti-Semites—who swarm the globe like cockroaches infesting a dumpy Bronx apartment, forcing slumlords to cram their hands into a pair of shoes and frantically run around crushing them—would snigger and say that Trump is basically running to be Israel’s Prime Minister already. Even worse, they’d say he’s running for America’s presidency on behalf of Israel’s Prime Minister.
Despite Trump’s pro-Israel kowtowing, this didn’t stop anti-Trump major news outlets such as The Washington Post and The New York Times from accusing him of…wait for it…anti-Semitism! “Oh, so Trump thinks Jewish people have disproportionate political power?” belched the Post’s headline. “Trump’s Suggestion That Jews Could Cost Him Race Creates Fear of Antisemitic Reprisal,” bleated the Times.
It’s unclear what poll Trump was citing that claimed the Jew Skew was 60-40 in Harris’s favor, but according to a September 9 study conducted by what I’m certain is the entirely unbiased Jewish Democratic Council of America:
Harris leads Trump with U.S. Jews by a 72 to 25 percent margin…. Trump, meanwhile, holds an 83-17 percent lead over Harris among Orthodox Jews.
Speaking of Israel and the emotionally exhausting (for me, at least) forever wars that have plagued the Middle East since 1948 like the world’s longest dysfunctional marriage, last week’s big news involved the strategic detonation of Hezbollah members’ pager devices. I tend to zone out whenever the Middle East is mentioned, but just as they say about politics and race, although you may not care about them, they care about you. It’s a futile wish, but I wish the Middle East thought about me as much as I’m forced to think about the Middle East.
Hezbollah is a Lebanese—not lesbian—nongovernmental self-defense organization that has been increasingly trading fire with Israel ever since last October 7. This past Tuesday, countless Hezbollah members across Lebanon were wounded and several killed when their pager devices began exploding en masse.
Reuters, “Hezbollah pager explosions kill several people in Lebanon”:
Regional broadcasters carrying CCTV footage which showed what appeared to be a small handheld device placed next to a grocery store cashier where an individual was paying spontaneously exploding.
In other footage, an explosion appeared to knock out someone standing at a fruit stand at a market area.
Last Tuesday, the Jewish Press—although some would think the term “Jewish Press” is a redundancy, it also happens to be the name of a singular Jewish media outlet—estimated that over four thousand Hezbollah members were wounded in the attack and that nine were killed outright.
Although it was initially assumed that Mossad had somehow figured out a way to super-heat the pagers’ lithium batteries, experts say that an exploding battery wouldn’t generate sufficient force to kill someone. The likelier scenario is that Mossad planted explosives in a shipment of pagers targeted for Hezbollah members—who, ironically, were using the obsolete cellular devices not necessarily because Lebanese people are primitive sand fleas but because they presumed pagers would be more difficult to track and detonate than smartphones.
Israel upped the ante on Wednesday, targeting solar panels and walkie-talkies. Israel has refused to claim responsibility for the attacks. Then again, Israel still refuses to claim that they have hundreds of nuclear bombs, so I’d take everything they say with a grain of kosher salt.
This wasn’t the first time that an Israeli intelligence agency used telecommunications devices to take out an adversary. In 1996, Shin Bet planted explosives in Hamas bombmaker Yayha Ayyash’s cellphone, killing him. In 1972, Mossad killed a PLO representative “by remotely detonating the explosives packed inside his phone.”
Just as “cult” is a word used to malign religions that haven’t gained enough followers, “terrorism” is a semantically loaded term employed to smear renegade military organizations. If you believe that all governments exist to monopolize the use of violence and intimidation, it’s easy to unshackle the word “terrorism” from its lopsided political implications. Surely the bombing of Dresden was used to psychologically terrorize the Germans. Same applies to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Or the highly theatrical and deeply symbolic targeting of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Or, really, any “shock and awe” tactic used in warfare.
Whatever your views on Jews, you’d be a dimwit to deny they are masters of propaganda. Large swaths of the Western public have been terrorized into submission for fear of speaking, or even thinking, anything negative about them.
This recent targeting of Hezbollah members’ pagers was a masterstroke of psychological terrorism. The silent message was, “We know who you are, where you are, and we can strike you whenever we want.”
Add to this the fact that since people tend to keep their cellular devices in their front and back pockets, many of the victims wound up either neutered or ass-blasted. It’s not entirely schizoid to suspect that this was also a deliberate mass-emasculation psy-op on Mossad’s part.
In a much more comical display of terroristic genital mutilation botched by technological ineptitude, the “Underwear Bomber” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab inflicted second-degree burns to his own genitalia when he attempted to detonate a bomb sewn into his undergarments on a plane in Detroit in 2009.
But enough about Israel, testicle-targeted beepers, and bungled underwear bombs. Anyone reading this is using some sort of digital device through which intelligence agencies can easily track, monitor, and use against you at their whim. Using a screen name—or just scrolling while refusing to ever post anything—does not keep you safe from being watched. As Prophet Ted Kaczynski warned in the 1990s, technology will be the death of human freedom.
And as Senator Frank Church of Church Committee infamy warned about US intelligence agencies in the 1970s:
Now, why is this investigation important? I’ll tell you why: because I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.
In what might (or might not) be pure coincidence, Frank Church died in the year 1984. The same year, the feds honored his death by renaming a remote area in Idaho the “Frank Church—River of No Return Wilderness.”
“What in the Sam Hill does any of this have to do with Donald Trump making a speech before Jewish lobbyists last Thursday evening?” you ask me, one eyebrow arched and one index finger ready to push a button and call a man in a white suit to drive up in a white wagon, capture me in his dogcatcher’s net, and whisk me away for my safety.
It’s a fair question, and I thank you for your concern. In last week’s column I struggled to distinguish between paranoia and skepticism. I believe that most intelligent people realize we’re gradually slipping into a techno hellscape where machines may eventually supplant humans in the next stage of evolution and render humanity extinct at worst or impotent at best. Maybe the line between “paranoia” and “mental health” is that sane people realize there’s no upside to dwelling very long on unpleasant truths. Same applies to death. We all realize we’re headed that way, which is why nearly everything we do is an attempt to think about something else.
That’s why I’ll end this Worst Week with a nugget of what seems like good news, at least for the foreseeable future…
Study: America Is Less Woke Than it Was in 2020—But Still Far Woker Than in 2015
The Homeland Institute’s first-ever poll last year was titled “‘Wokeness’ is Now Almost as Dangerous as ‘Racism’ for Politicians and Businesses.”
Last Thursday, The Economist released its findings in a meta-analysis they conducted regarding the prominence of “woke” beliefs and practices in American life. They titled their article “America is becoming less ‘woke’.” It’s lavishly illustrated with charts and worth a peek:
The Economist has attempted to quantify the prominence of woke ideas in four domains: public opinion, the media, higher education and business. Almost everywhere we looked a similar trend emerged: wokeness grew sharply in 2015, as Donald Trump appeared on the political scene, continued to spread during the subsequent efflorescence of #MeToo and Black Lives Matter, peaked in 2021-22 and has been declining ever since….
Either way, the results are consistent: America has passed “peak woke”.
We examined responses over the past 25 years to polls conducted by Gallup, General Social Survey (gss), Pew and YouGov. Woke opinions on racial discrimination began to grow around 2015 and peaked around 2021. In the most recent Gallup data, from earlier this year, 35% of people said they worried “a great deal” about race relations, down from a peak of 48% in 2021 but up from 17% in 2014…
The Economist cautions readers not to gain too much comfort from their results or to see the recent trends as anything more than temporary:
For one thing, although all our measures are below their peak, they remain well above the level of 2015 in almost every instance. What is more, in some respects, woke ideas may be less discussed simply because they have become broadly accepted…. There is also a chance that Gen Z, the most woke generation, retains this outlook as it ages, which would lead to a gradual increase in woke views among the broader population.
Sigh. Just as life never ends well, good news always seems to come with an expiration date.
28 comments
I saw the following comment on another revolutionary website and had to repackage it here and share: When normies and others ask, “How did they get explosives into the buildings on 9/11 without anyone noticing?” We can now respond by asking, “How did they get those explosives into all those pagers and walkie-talkies without anyone noticing?”
We all noticed the airplanes crashing.
I don’t believe that the Mossad was in any way behind any of the 9-11 attacks. Nor the US Deep State – but they exploited it afterwards, to pass the Patriot Act (2001) and to authorize the invasion Iraq (2003).
However, I do think the Mossad was behind the JFK assassination (1963). They are evil, but they are not omnipotent.
It’s impossible to know whether the Mossad was involved in the 9-11. In the end, the American response turned out to be especially advantageous to Israeli interests. Reports of well-connected dual Israeli citizens not showing up for work that day, as well as the “dancing Israelis” reported by mainstream media makes the question a possibility. Of course, we’ll get the answer right after they release the Martin King and JFK files.
Yes, and Ehud Barak just happened to be in the BBC World newsroom to tell everyone how Al Qaeda was responsible and how important it was going to be to support Israel in light of all. Dancing Israelis, warning pages, the Gelatin art collective on the 91st floor, Larry Silverstein’s fortuitous purchase and insurance of the buildings? Nothing to see here.
I agree with the first paragraph.
However, people overthink the JFK assassination. It is hard for many people to fathom the idea that the guy who gave use “we are a nation of immigrants” and was gunned down and then sainted could have been cruelly killed by a loser. At about 81 meters, the Kennedy kill shot should have been easy for anybody with basic rifle marksmanship training. Most rifles are sighted in at 100 meters, and Oswald made two out of three shots.
Oswald was nothing special, just a guy who brought his surplus rifle to work one day, seriously wounding the Governor and killing the President.
If you live or work near a public or civic venue, you will undoubtedbly see VIPs from time to time, and Oswald had notice of the parade route in the newspapers. At my former work office, the 4th floor window was about the same distance away where Presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama and former President Bill Clinton stood at the lectern to speak on the lawn. The Secret Service did a walk through and said hello, but a big difference then from 1963 was that today Secret Service checks to make sure building windows are closed or can’t open. Oh, and also, I never brought my rifle in to work those days. 🙂
Oswald was interested in Communist Cuban groups where the real revolution was, but they were not in the least interested in him. The kooky “resume” photographs that his wife took of him in his backyard sporting his revolver and his rifle and some Communist newspapers impressed no one with revolutionary inclinations or otherwise. The CIA watched some of these groups but Oswald was never on their radar.
Oswald was only mildly on the FBI radar because he was a former defector who made a trip in October to the Soviet embassy at Mexico City hoping to go back via Cuba, so they wanted to update his address for their files. That is why Agent Hosty visited the home of Ruth Paine in Irving, Texas where Oswald’s estranged wife was staying but not Oswald. Afterwards Oswald made a complaint to the Dallas FBI office about harassment and left a nasty note for Agent Hosty with the secretary.
Oswald had previously taken a potshot at Rightwing politician General Walker at his Dallas home and narrowly missed, but the case immediately went cold. Since Marina Oswald knew of the attempted assassination of Gen. Walker earlier that year, Agent Hosty’s routine visit terrified her but she stayed silent.
Oswald would have preferred to bag a John Bircher “Fascist” like Gen. Walker, but scoring the President or even the Governor would have established his “street cred” for the ages.
Oswald hitched a ride to Ruth Paine’s house on Thursday night from his coworker, Buell Wesley Frazier, who was Mrs. Paine’s neighbor. Oswald said goodbye to his wife and gave her all of that was left of his paycheck except for about $13 in his pocket. On Friday morning, the day of the assassination, Mr. Frazier picked Oswald up to take him to work and noticed that he had retrieved a long package wrapped in brown packing paper. Oswald had retrieved his partially-disasembled high-powered WWII Italian rifle from his stuff that was stored in Mrs. Paine’s garage.
I don’t think Oswald had much of an exit strategy other than bemusement that he just walked away from the Texas School Book Depository in the clamor. Frazier saw him leave after the assassination but assumed that he was just going for a sandwich since he did not pack a lunch. He was the only TSBD employee not available shortly later for a police muster and therefore immediately became the prime suspect. Officer J.D. Tippit had no doubt heard the description go out on the police radio. Oswald bought a bus ticket but nothing was moving in the traffic jam, so he hopped into a cab at the Greyhound bus station and was dropped off near (but not at) his boarding house two miles away for a 99 cent fare.
Oswald was walking briskly hoping to catch a bus and return to Mexico when Police Officer J.D. Tippit pulled his car over by the sidewalk to question him and got shot four times and killed as he exited the police car at 10th Street and Patton. This was seen by numerous witnesses, and Oswald immediately ejected the spent shell casings to reload his modified Smith & Wesson .38 at the crime scene before running off.
Due to a tip from a Hudson’s shoe store clerk on Jefferson Ave. who saw him acting weird, Oswald was shortly afterwards captured hiding in the Texas Theater, which is in the same Oak Cliff neighborhood where Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina had lived and likely gone to many times.
The Dallas Police had Oswald in custody barely a couple of hours after the Kennedy and Connally shootings. When Oswald learned that he had killed the President, he was quite pleased with himself. And we are still talking about him today.
The martyred Jack Kennedy was a Righteous Gentile for down-and-out nightclub owner Jacob Rubenstein (aka Jack Ruby) when he walked down the ramp into the basement garage on the Main Street side of the Dallas Municipal Court House building because of the sudden press commotion when Ruby was returning to his car after visiting the Western Union office at the end of the block. The authorities had actually announced to the media that suspect Lee Harvey Oswald would be moved to another facility that morning.
Ruby happened to be walking by and noticed the buzz. He was used to carrying a snubby .38 Colt revolver when he carried cash. Ruby calmly walked into the crowded garage down the ramp just in time as a smirking Oswald was being brought down to the police car that was moving into position, and Ruby impulsively shot him at nearly point blank range. The bullet almost passed through Oswald’s body as he was handcuffed to escorting Dallas Police Detective Jim Leavelle. The Ruby-Oswald murder went out on live television or pretty close to it (LINK).
Ruby never went there that day to kill anybody; he had left his beloved dachshund Sheba in his parked car when he walked the block over to the Western Union office. Jack Ruby was just a nosy simpleton barely keeping his burlesque club afloat with watered drinks and scantily-clad (but not nude) dancers. He saw the Press and TV crews gathering right then at the court house parking garage, so he went in for a look ─ easily gliding past the lone guard at the ramp entrance (who was busy helping police vehicles get situated).
Sometimes things just happen the way that they do.
🙂
You are a marvel, Scott. Can we have the word counts back please?
On Jesse Ventura’s old TV show, he brought in a professional sniper to simulate the shot supposedly by Lee Harvey. He couldn’t do it. And Lee Harvey was an air conditioner repairman in the Marines, not a sniper. Oswald was a patsy.
I’d say the “professional sniper” was a liar or else the TV show distorted his views. That is what happens with virtually all entertainment talk shows.
Oswald was extremely dyslexic and could barely write a basic business letter, although he read Marxist books and used big words. He was not dumb.
All Marines, even the cooks, focus on marksmanship. Their boot camp lasts 12 weeks compared to Army basic training at 8 weeks, and they spend at least a week more time at the range than we did. An Army infantryman would then go to Fort Benning, GA for AIT (Advanced Infantry Training). I did both Basic and AIT at nearby Fort Gordon, which is the home of the Army Signal Corps. (Yes, I know these forts are no longer named after Confederate generals, but I do not accept the woke reality.)
In any case, any soldier who can not make a head shot at less than 100 meters would “Bolo” instead of qualify with his rifle.
In my unit in 1981 only me (from Idaho and familiar with firearms) plus three other people in the company, two of whom were Rednecks from Arkansas, could actually shoot straight. The inner-city Blacks were the absolute worst, and most of them Bolo-ed without rifle qualification but actually graduated anyway.
Lee Harvey Oswald was a very decent, above-average shooter with his USMC marksmanship scores. Sometimes he took the tests more seriously than other times. Marksmanship may have been the only thing that LHO learned in the Marines. I doubt if he did anything more important than make coffee or carry tools. He certainly did not have access to classified materials.
I used to routinely make head shots at 300 meters in the Army with an M-16, and I was in the Signal Corps not an actual grunt.
When they say that professional shooters could not make a head shot at less than 81 meters with three tries, they are at best being misleading with arbitrary timing criteria per the bolt-action rifle.
Since the Zapruder film had no sound and one of the crucial shots occurred while the limousine was behind the Stemmons freeway sign, we don’t know the exact timing of the shots.
Also, contrary to Oliver Stone, the Warren Commission Report does not hinge around a magic bullet.
The acceptable but minority view on the WC was that Oswald fired three shots and wounded Kennedy and Connally with two separate shots and then hit Kennedy with the fatal third shot.
But the majority view ─ the one that Warren finally adopted, and the correct one in my opinion ─ was that the first (high-deflection angle) shot missed and very slightly wounded civilian James Tague on the cheek with a fragment or debris as he stood downrange while watching the motorcade at the triple underpass.
The second shot (fired when the motorcade was behind the freeway sign with respect to Zapruder) hit Kennedy in the upper right back and came out near his throat, and then hit Connally ─ keyholing through his back, wrist, and thigh, where the bullet lodged in his pant leg.
Kennedy was sitting on the right-hand side of a bench seat that had been raised, and Connally was sitting much lower on a jump seat that was also closer to the center of the vehicle. The bullet trajectory to the two wounded men lines up very well with the Sixth Floor window.
And the third and farthest shot away at 81 meters ─ was also the easiest one because the tree was no longer in the way and the car was no longer moving at an oblique angle and was then almost stopped ─ the bullet hitting the upper-right side of JFK’s cranium and then parts of the car windshield framing, and fragmented in the process. Some bullet fragments were recovered combing the carpet of the vehicle.
If this last shot had been any more high and to the right by an inch or two, it would have missed the President entirely ─ and like Connally, the President might have survived his previous wounding.
Most of the bullshït about the Kennedy assassination was due to muckraking lawyer (((Mark Lane))) who was a complete snake, coaching witnesses, etc. He was another Jew who considered Kennedy to be a Righteous Gentile.
Then in the 1970s, the TV news magazines like Geraldo told stories that went along with the Kennedy hagiography but always left out core important facts. Despite the hearings in Congress in the 1970s debunking most of the nonsense like CIA plots, that was not exactly the way that the TV specials wanted to tell the stories.
By the way, the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza in Dallas is an excellent resource. They have an incredible library of oral histories from anybody who was there, for example.
🙂
I do think the Mossad was behind the JFK assassination (1963)
I do not think so. I would rather suspect Castro.
Kök Böri September 25, 2024 responds to: I do think the Mossad was behind the JFK assassination (1963)
I do not think so. I would rather suspect Castro.
—
You are naive, Kök. You should grasp and believe what Ben Klassen told us more than 40 years ago in his White Man’s Bible:
CREATIVE CREDO No. 38
Russia, Israel and the United States
“…The Mossad, super Spy network. The other Jew spy organization that is of major world-wide importance is the one headquartered in Israel. It is known as the Mossad. It is the central Jewish intelligence gathering apparatus for the entire world. It is the super-supra spy network of all history. Anything the American C.I.A. knows that is useful to the Jews (just about everything) is funneled to the Mossad. Everything the Russian K.G.B. knows that is useful is funneled to the Mossad. Likewise with the intelligence gathering apparatus in Germany, France, Italy and throughout the world, it is all funneled to the Mossad. There is hardly anything of significance that happens anywhere in the world but what it is, is shortly catalogued in the massive computers of the Mossad in Israel.
Deadly criminals. But the Mossad goes much further than just spying and gathering intelligence from all over the world. Like the A.D.L., it is virulently aggressive and continually on the offensive. It has well trained assassination squads that run rampant in most of the countries of the world, especially in the United States. It sets up para-military organizations like the Jewish Defense League, or Jewish gun clubs trained to skillfully kill Gentiles. The members of Mossad have the run of the United States with little or no opposition from “our own” law enforcement agencies while they will tap telephones, bug embassies, foreign diplomats, even the White House and any and every branch of the United States government. In short, not only the United States, but the whole world is their undisputed territory, and the White Man, (their main victim) not only gives them no opposition, but pays the bill and hardly knows they exist.
Runs Rampant over World Governments. Undoubtedly the Mossad is the most dangerous, cruel and blood-thirsty gang of international criminals the world has ever known, running rampant and roughshod over all laws and governments throughout the world, with little or no opposition. Like the C.I.A., it is world-wide and parallels many of its operations with this difference: Whereas the C.I.A. is headquartered in the United States, the Mossad is headquartered in Israel; whereas the C.I.A. is manned by a mixture of Jews and Gentiles, the Mossad is all Jewish; whereas the C.I.A. freely shares its information with the Mossad, the latter gives nothing to the C.I.A. It is strictly a one-way street, all leading to exclusive Jewish supremacy and tyranny over the “goy” of the world…”
Good news: (180) Palestinians & Friends Attack Israeli Occupiers – Page 35 – White Biocentrism.com
JohnUbele wrote: Wed Sep 25, 2024
In a first, Hezbollah targets Mossad
Headquarters in Tel Aviv with Qader 1
Ballistic Missile
“…The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon – Hezbollah announced Wednesday morning that its fighters launched a Qader 1 ballistic missile targeting the Mossad headquarters in the suburbs of Tel Aviv.
According to the group’s statement, the HQs is responsible for the assassination of Resistance leaders and the waves of pagers and walkie-talkies explosions, which killed dozens and injured thousands of people across Lebanon.
Hezbollah said the operation was “in support of our steadfast Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and their valiant and honorable resistance and in defense of Lebanon and its people”.
The attack is unprecedented, as it marked the first time the Lebanese Resistance group targeted Tel Aviv suburbs with a missile, cementing “the strike for strike” and “Tel Aviv for Beirut” equation…”
I am disturbed by the thought that all this is made possible by the design of our own government and the money interest minority which control it, and for benefits which they personally reap. Nothing in this little wasteland could stand on its own two feet if its main artery from D.C. was cut. To publicly preach peace at yesterdays UN meeting while increasing weapon shipments (for the intended purpose of defense no less!) is an insult to the intelligence of every UN representative who sat in attendance.
I would read what Dr. Revilo P. Oliver had to say about the JFK Assassination. He even testified at the Warren Commission. I don’t believe Ruby aka Rubenstein just happened to shoot Oswald on a whim nor do I believe that it was cohencidence that Abraham Zapruder shot the best film of the assassination. Jews are such a small minority in the US, even more so in 1963, yet two Jews are right there in the thick of the assassination. Dr. Oliver surmised that if Oswald wasn’t caught the plan was to blame the assassination on “right wingers” and patriotic Americans like General Edwin Walker and members of the John Birch Society, Christian Voters & Buyers League, etc. Out of all the books and articles written about the assassination Dr. Oliver and Michael Collins Piper explain it best.
Oy Vey! He’s totally mashugana.
Frank Church was right. His 1975 Senate committee investigation was prophetic. We have indeed crossed over “the abyss from which there is no return” – just as he feared.
Now I learn that in 1984, the Feds renamed an area in Idaho, the “Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness”. I thought it was a joke, at first, until I did an Internet search. Now I suppose puts me on the Fed’s database. However, I use a VPN – that might protect me.
I like the “White Pill” at the end of this article. The Homeland Institute conducts some useful & interesting soundings of public opinion.
Senator Frank Church was a blowhard Democrat and I could barely stand him, but I don’t agree with those Conservatives who think that his Hearings compromised national security in any way.
Btw, the “River of No Return” has always been called that, although the wilderness used to be called the Primitive Area. Frank Church’s Republican colleague in the Senate, Jim McClure got the Wilderness Area named after him. Senator McClure was very good on the 2nd Amendment. McClure’s campaign commercials showed him hiking trails with a high-powered rifle slung over his shoulder.
In Idaho, you see Mountain Lions quite a lot and one of them made a snack out of my Mom’s cat. For years the government has been reintroducing wild animals like wolves and bears, and it seems like every year now hikers and hunters are getting mauled by Grizzlies, which have a particularly nasty mean streak in the area. I’ve heard it’s because it gets too hot for them in the Summertime.
A few years ago when I visited Idaho, I came across a Grizz in the middle of the road chomping on some carrion bones and splashing around in a big puddle of water. It’s a good idea to keep the 10mm within reach on such excursions because bear spray does nothing. But this guy couldn’t care less about me and even moved out of the way of my car.
Even in Arizona not very long ago, a guy was killed by a Black Bear while he sat reading the newspaper at a picnic table. About the same time, my friend from the Bisbee area came home one evening and found his cat hiding and a giant Mojave rattler snoozing in the shed like it owned the place. But that wasn’t why the cat was spooked. Shining the flashlight out into the bushes, there were some glowing eyes. A Mountain Lion was just sitting out there eyeing things.
🙂
used telecommunications devices to take out an adversary
We need to push back on this “brilliant Israeli scientific geniuses” trope (not that you are promoting it, Jim!). Hezbollah was entirely correct to think that “primitive” pagers were more secure, in terms of electronics. All the Jews did was intercept the shipment and plant explosives. This wasn’t Elon Musk creating Space X. They could do the same thing to CRT TVs or vinyl records. “Ha ha, all those anti-Semites buying Karajan’s Ring Cycle got what they deserved!”
Yeah, I agree. It’s not rocket science.
I used to be a Broadcast Engineer and have worked on a lot of two-way radios and have an Extra Class Amateur Radio License and a lifetime membership in the American Radio Relay League. Remote-controlled devices are not that hard to make.
It would be pretty easy for state actors or any experts to rig up equipment like this for the command-detonation of explosives with fake battery cells or whatever that would not be easily noticed by sleeping Dindus X-raying things at the insufferable TSA queue.
I don’t know about the pagers, but the walkie-talkies in question were Icom IC-V82 handheld 2-meter band Ham radios (LINK) that were made about 2005-2010 and are no longer supported by Icom, which is a Japanese electronics manufacturer and they make excellent Amateur Radio stuff.
According to Ray Novak, Amateur call sign N9JA, who is the Icom national sales representative and a familiar face at various trade shows, Icom did not provide these radios. I’m guessing that they must have been from a batch that had been obtained somehow and then stored for some contingency, which hints at a state actor being involved.
I presume that the radios were modified to use the VHF business band instead of the 2-meter Amateur Radio band, but regardless, they will receive from the top of the AM aircraft band at 137 MHz to 174 MHz FM, and they will transmit in both Analog and Digital modes. There are various ways to use them to make telephone calls, and it is not going to work like Big Brother in your pocket in the manner that your cell phone does because they don’t ping cell towers.
My understanding is that booby-trapping consumer equipment or toys is against International Law agreements and therefore a War Crime, but as Israel does not even acknowledge their nuclear weapons arsenal, good luck with that.
🙂
My, The Donald is going above and beyond the call of duty here…
Cheerio, Jim, your British accent is absolutely spotless. 😊😊
Church was an anti-White democrat who supported forced integration. He was a typical communist who opposed intelligence agencies when they supported the interests of White Americans, but wholeheartedly supported depriving White Americans of their right to free association.
A story as old as Time – the magazine that is not the non-spatial continuum….
It’s just the usual kosher sandwich of milquetoast affirmative action, never look back “conservatism” laced with ultra-Zionism on the one hand and rabid anti-White Jewish international socialism hiding behind a paper screen of anti-colonial “standing up to Israel” on the other. The same thing is on the electoral menu, although for lower stakes, down under. I guess the difference this time is the promise from both slices of the sandwich to curtail freedom of speech pertaining to Jews.
Not Trump’s funniest off the cuff remarks, but par for the course Trump to brag he would be elected president of Israel. I know there are many on this site who cannot stop going on about anything Jewish (not recognizing there are a lot of hard right leaning Jews). But strong stances on that issue have been nothing but trouble for white identity movements. And not only that, it has been ineffective.
In less than a year of this latest Palestinian-Israel war, a bunch of non-white groups have been far more effective in their cultural critiques. Arabs and Farsi groups, Antifa, and plenty of Blacks, too. Ta Nehisi Coates is even joining in. It is a circular firing squad about to happen. Grab a self licking ice cream cone and watch, but don’t participate.
james Smith: September 26, 2024 I am disturbed by the thought that all this is made possible by the design of our own government and the money interest minority which control it, and for benefits which they personally reap. Nothing in this little wasteland could stand on its own two feet if its main artery from D.C. was cut…
—
James, forget the UN or NATO for controlling the (((money interests))) of the globalists who won WWII. We know now that Russia, the U.S., and UK lost that war as did Germany that was targeted for destruction by those Jew-led Allies (Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill). See “The Measure of Greatness” at nationalvanguard.org.
Jewry won that war. It’s unfortunate that Wolf’s informed position as a dedicated Russian racial ethnic nationalist has not received wider recognition among pro-White communities as it has. But his essays are archived at WhiteBiocentrism.com in the Words of Wolf Stoner subforum. Read this one subtopic there for the truth from Wolf two years ago about Putinists and the Kremlin for more about the ethnic makeup of Russia today, especially of Chechens:”(180) Victory Frenzy” at WhiteBiocentrism.com:
…Yes, you are absolutely right. There is a widespread misunderstanding in the West about Russian internal interethnic relations. The mainstream people in the West simply don’t know the whole complexity of this question in Russia. There is even no differentiation in English between ethnic Russians (Russkie) and citizens of Russia (Rossiyane). The first are the real Russians and the second are all other holders of RF [Russian Federation] passports.
The share of ethnic Russians in RF is constantly diminishing. In two decades of Putin’s rule about 20 million of Asians were brought in under pretext of economic needs. The ethnic composition of some cities has changed beyond recognition. For example, in the city where I live (in central Russia) the share of Asian migrants (mostly Uzbeks and Tajiks) is above 30%; their share among young people is more than 50% [compare to America’s JOG-backed influx of non-White invaders]. There are some local kindergartens and primary schools where Russian children are in minority. This trend has passed the point of no return; there is no peaceful solution of this problem. Putin’s system was instrumental in creating this situation.
Few words about Chechens. Definitely, they have nothing to do with White Race. First of all because of their awful mentality. They are beasts, not humans. They are probably the worst tribe on Earth in terms of savagery and bloodthirstiness. America had an opportunity to acquaint itself with Chechens through Tsarnaev brothers. Chechens turned out to be a veritable plague for Russia. They are not especially numerous (about 2 million) but they constitute the backbone of all the most influential criminal organizations in the country. It would not be an exaggeration to assert that their very tribe works as an extended criminal syndicate. For centuries the main business of this tribe was to plunder surrounding nations and to hide in mountains when just punishment comes. They succeeded in this business excellently.
Yet one of the unforgivable crimes of Putin’s regime was to elevate Chechens to the unofficial status of a Praetorian Guard of the regime. Putin’s system heavily relies on Chechens in its suppression of dissent in Russia. Chechens and other North Caucasus tribesmen are widely used in riot police units.
Chechens were the first who supported Bolsheviks in 1917. They at once started to massacre local Russian population even before the wider Civil War started. They were loyal to Soviet power throughout Civil War in 1917-1920. But after the Civil War ended, they rebelled against the new system too because they hate any orderly society. Before it, they fought against Russian empire for more than a century.
The origin of Chechens is not known precisely. But there is a hypothesis that they are the remnants of Khazars, whose state encompassed North Caucasus region, lower Don and Volga rivers.
In modern times Chechens had become especially notorious for their morbid predilection to bloody executions of their victims. They massacred hundreds of innocent people on camera for only reason to intimidate other Russians. In 1990es they ethnically cleansed the whole Russian community in Chechen republic. 300 thousands Russians were chased out of there or killed. No one left; from then onward Chechnya has become an ethnically pure territory in Russian Federation.
In 1990es Chechens openly practiced slavery and slave trade; they kept thousands of Russian slaves whom they exploited mercilessly, tortured and killed. Chechen gangs roamed other regions of Russia, robbed businessmen, took hostages for money, racketeered, stole cars. The quasi-independent Chechnya had become a criminal hub where the whole economy consisted of all kinds of illegal activities (wholesale narcotics import into other Russian regions, processing of stolen cars, slave trade, printing of fake money, explosives and guns production).
Chechen way of torture and executions is especially nasty; they are as cruel as American Indians. They try to inflict as much pain as possible to their victim. They cut fingers, ears, disembowel when a victim is yet alive. Especially they fond of cutting off heads; not rapidly chopping off, as it is usual among other tribes but to do it in slow fashion with a knife, enjoying the process. There are multiple videos of such executions. It should be stressed that those atrocities were not detached actions of some criminals but this behavior was widely supported by the whole Chechen community. It is normal and even commendable for them. They glorify those perpetrators as “national independence fighters”….
Read more at the above WB link. Know that English is Wolf’s second language.
I refer to these “globalists” you mention as financially and now politically powerful Oligarchs or simply businessmen. I believe the wars now being fought are not primarily between different political philosophies, flags or nationalities, but oligarchs who are competing for the final prize economic and military world dominance. Thugs like Netanyahu and Ben G. are simply trolls who are locally rewarded for their part in a bigger game. Thank you for providing the Chechen history and perspective information.
J Webb: September 25, 2024 …[P]ar for the course Trump to brag he would be elected president of Israel.
—
If it’s true that Donald quietly converted to Judaism in 2017, he’s probably eligible to become President of Israel. He is a Zionist who loves Israel, after all, and has said that “anti-Semites should get the death penalty” once he’s re-elected. See: “Trump Converted to Judaism in 2017 – by Anthony James Hall” at substack.com. Can someone here confirm or deny this? Regardless I’ll still cast my vote for him over Kalama (((Emhoff))) because his election may buy us some time.
—-
I know there are many on this site who cannot stop going on about anything Jewish (not recognizing there are a lot of hard right leaning Jews). But strong stances on that issue have been nothing but trouble for white (sic} identity movements. And not only that, it has been ineffective.
In less than a year of this latest Palestinian-Israel war, a bunch of non-white groups have been far more effective in their cultural critiques. Arabs and Farsi groups, Antifa, and plenty of Blacks, too. Ta Nehisi Coates is even joining in, but don’t participate.
—
Don’t worry, J, I won’t be joining with any of those allegedly “effective” non-Whites who support Hamas Semites against their Jew occupiers.
Pray tell, who are these “hard right leaning Jews”? I’m not in this so-called “hard right leaning white (sic) identity movement.” As a biological race-thinker I do not associate or compromise with racial Jews (including Ronald Unz, Brother Nathanial, etc.). Count me in with uncompromising White racial nationalist/separatists. You will not be changing my mind or changing the subject from the JQ, thanks.
Let’s All Drink to the Death of a Clown: October 27, 2024 I would read what Dr. Revilo P. Oliver had to say about the JFK Assassination… Out of all the books and articles written about the assassination Dr. Oliver and Michael Collins Piper explain it best.
—
Yes, a good way to find what RPO had to say about the JFK assassination is to simply put ‘Oliver JFK’ in the search block at the NV site as I just did. Up popped these three essays about the subject by Dr, Oliver.
“Killing Kennedy” at nationalvanguard.org. |
“Spiced Crambe” at nationalvanguard.org.
“Cinematic Résumé” at nationalvanguard.org.
Those pieces by Dr. Oliver, though illuminating for our side, are rather dated. An updated piece about Jewish participation in the assassination is offered by Hadding Scott, here: “Basic Facts About the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy” at nationalvanguard.org.
Another even more recent piece, by the excellent researcher and former C-C writer, Andrew Hamilton, is: “Jews and the Assassination of JFK” at nationalvanguard.org. He provides links to Dr. Oliver’s earlier writings on the assassination with this:
…The Warren Commission even subpoenaed Revilo Oliver to testify because he had written a two-part article, “Marxmanship in Dallas,” for the John Birch Society’s American Opinion magazine shortly after the assassination. (A different version, from an original Oliver manuscript, can be read online here.)
I was so fascinated by the fact that the Commission had done something so stupid, irrelevant, and time-wasting that I looked up the transcript in the full report. (You now have the luxury of reading it online if you wish.)
The Feds assiduously tracked “news items and newspapers published in Washington, D.C., Illinois, Mississippi, Arizona, Texas, Colorado, California, and other States” containing “reports of lectures and speeches made by” Oliver in which he “repeated, elaborated upon, or added to the charges and claims made” in the American Opinion article!
Interestingly, Mr. Hamilton is critical of Piper’s Final Judgment in his piece.
The JFK murder aside, it’s good to see another piece that exposes Trump as the Judeophile that he is.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.