The Rise & Fall of Andrew Tate,
Part 1 of 3 (Part 2 here)
The more you retreat from actions into words, the more you will be tempted to lie to get rich. By “actions,” I mean the following: caring for people, engineering things, programming things, fighting off an enemy, and physical labor. And by “words,” I mean making money in more verbal ways. When Andrew Tate retired from kickboxing, he retreated from actions into words — specifically, sales and entrepreneurship. He succumbed to the temptation to lie, and he deceived people as an OnlyFans entrepreneur, a casino owner, and as a pyramid schemer — but through it all, he retained a weird tendency to be candid about his profitmaking activities. Oddly enough, because he makes much of his money from such seedy, secretive activities, he can afford to be honest about masculinity and gender while others enmeshed in polite society cannot. Because of this odd combination of honesty and dishonesty, he is not a typical self-made centimillionaire.
Tate’s combination of good and bad characteristics may be intentional, given that YouTube psychologist Todd Grande claims that he wants 70% of people to like him and 30% to hate him. The unintended effect is that many people both dislike and like him depending on what he’s saying or doing.
Tate is popular with the youth. According to Similarweb, 29% of visitors to his website are Zoomers aged 18-24, which is a high percentage for that demographic. Other Rightist political figures — and Tate is a Rightist — don’t even come close. Tied at 22% are Jordan Peterson’s website, Matt Walsh’s blog, and Mike Peinovich’s The Right Stuff. Tate is way ahead of them in terms of his demographic’s youthfulness.
Tate has a young audience partly because more young men in anglophone nations are non-white, and as a mixed race man, he appeals more to them.
Tate also appeals to Zoomers more because they watch his YouTube shorts and TikTok videos. He doesn’t post those videos himself, however; he lures others into doing it by suggesting that they can be as rich as he is if they join his multi-level marketing scheme called “Hustler’s University,” where he is essentially at the top as “Top G” and everyone else is at the bottom. Thus, it’s really a dual-level marketing scheme.
In contrast to Tate, political commentators who made their names in older forms of media such as television and radio don’t appeal as much to Zoomers. For example, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin attract low percentages of Zoomers to their websites. They get only 9%, 10%, and 11% Zoomers, respectively.
Tate reminds me of Milo Yiannopoulos because he’s an anti-feminist and is charismatic, but he’s a lot more popular than Milo ever was. Milo only had 388,000 Twitter followers before he was banned, whereas Tate now has over 5 million. His rise to fame has been meteoric. It makes one wonder where he came from.
Tate was born to an African-American father and a white British mother in Washington, DC and spent most of his youth in Chicago. His father, Emory Tate, is best known for being a great chess player. As a young man, Emory scored very highly on the US military’s IQ test and was placed in military intelligence. He had an uncanny ability to learn and translate Russian. Emory lost his job, however, because he couldn’t get along with his superiors. Rather than find a way to use his genius talent, they simply wanted to dispose of him. They demanded that he sign a document admitting that he suffered from narcissistic personality disorder in return for giving him a handsome lifelong pension, but he refused, stating that “my sanity is not for sale.”
Emory came to regret his decision after a lifetime of poverty, and tried to get the back pay he was owed in order to pass it on to his kids and their mother, who was struggling with arthritis while working as a dishwasher. According to Andrew, when Emory tried to get the pay, the US government claimed it was too late. Emory’s life experiences seem to have influenced Andrew’s notion that the world is against good people and that desperate acts are necessary to overcome this.
After Emory’s discharge, the Tate family lived in poverty until his parents divorced and his mother moved back to the United Kingdom, taking Andrew and his two siblings with her. While in the UK, Andrew adopted kickboxing and became a four-time kickboxing champion. His Wikipedia page lists his record as 76 wins and 9 losses, but I suspect these numbers are false, because such a record would give him more wins as well as a higher win-to-loss ratio than most of the top-ranked kickboxers, yet his name never appears alongside theirs. Wikipedia accounts for 23 of his wins and 8 of his losses. Another source claims that his actual record may be 43-9. Regardless of which one is correct, his career was impressive, and few men can say they’ve kickboxed professionally, let alone won so many bouts. It would still be nice if he could try to substantiate those alleged 76 wins on Wikipedia, however.
Tate also had a thing for appearing on reality TV shows. On the UK’s Ultimate Traveler, a then 19-year-old Tate tried to deviously divide and conquer his opponents so that he could win the prize at the end, but an eye injury he had suffered while kickboxing became aggravated and he left the competition.
Ten years later, he got kicked off the UK’s Big Brother 17 because of video appearing online that showed him slapping and whipping a woman. The two would later claim it was consensual, but it still looks disturbing. He seems to have a total lack of empathy and inhibitions in striking her. Other footage shows him yelling at a woman who had locked him out of a hotel room because he claims she knew he’d receive a beating for “misbehaving.” (Psychopaths often talk down to people like this.) His voice sounds creepy in these videos, like an African-American pimp from the 1970s or the abusive African-American man in Alice Walker’s The Color Purple. The odd thing is that when he read a poem about a lost lover, his voice took on similarly demented characteristics.
Another reason Tate was kicked off Big Brother is that he made some politically incorrect online posts. One reads: “If I wanted to see black people running, I’d just threaten them with jobs.” He can be very witty.
Perhaps in an effort to seek solace after being kicked off Big Brother, Tate jumped on the Trump bandwagon in 2016, appearing on Alex Jones’ show to proclaim that white Christians were more persecuted than minorities. He seemed to be embellishing things to please the audience.
In a video from January 2019, Tate appears with Uberboyo, an Irish Nietzchean having right-wing leanings. For some background on Uberboyo, he recently appeared on Keith Woods’s channel to debate Nietzcheanism versus Platonism with YouTuber Aarvoll. This is about as right wing as person can get and still be kosher enough for YouTube, so it shows Tate was frequenting fairly right-wing circles. Tate tells Uberboyo that he agrees with Conservative Inc. pundit Candace Owens and InfoWars conspiracy theorist Paul Joseph Watson on most everything. Moreover, he avers support for UK civic nationalist activist Tommy Robinson, claiming that the British were crazy to imprison the man who was trying to help them. He doesn’t merely support civic nationalist individuals but also their positions, opposing migrants and blaming them for terrorist attacks and stabbings in London. He also seems to be a Brexit supporter, because he claims Germany was exerting too much influence over the UK despite the fact that they had fought the Second World War to prevent that from happening. Tate’s views from that time could be summed up as civic nationalist and somewhat conspiratorial, but he tells Uberboyo that he disagrees with Owens and Watson that the West can still be saved, claiming he had given up on the UK and moved to Romania because it is more of a Rightist country.
Tate was humbler and more relaxed in the video with Uberboyo from January 2019 than he is now. He related that he had just had some boxing sparring sessions the previous day, so that may have contributed to it, but overall, he seemed to be a humbler person then. He relates in the video that he makes $30,000 every two weeks, which amounts to $780k per year. At that time he was only worth a few million, but estimates are now that he’s worth $355 million. Perhaps being sort of rich didn’t go to his head, but being ultra rich did. His lawyer, Tina Glandian, claims his current TikTok persona is an act, but even in interviews with, for example, Piers Morgan or Tucker Carlson, he is colder, harsher, and in my opinion less likable than when he was poor and young. In acquiring his fortune, he may have gained the world, but he lost his soul. He also looked whiter in 2017, and in some sense perhaps he acted whiter.
Many people claim Tate is an incel leader, but in the interview with Uberboyo he suggests that many dissatisfied single men are merely ugly guys trying to date women who are out of their league. He does, however, offer the consolation to single men that he isn’t male model material but that he could still get women and suggests other men can improve their game as well and then tries to rope them into his online self-help shtick. People take Tate seriously as a self-help guru because he is ultra rich, but even when he was moderately rich, he was promoting himself as such.
He also admitted that his girl had just left him for a man as rich as Dan Bilzerian, but claimed it didn’t bother him. One wonders whether her going out with a richer man motivated him to try harder to get rich, because he claims in a more recent video that for a man to make a woman regret leaving him, he must not feel sorry for himself but take big actions to achieve big things in order to make her sad.
Tate appears in a video with a manosphere advocate in April of 2019 in which he admits that he has become a cyber pimp. The way he did this, according to one video, is that several years before 2019, he invited four of his former sex partners to come live with him. Presumably they each thought that they would be his only lover, but when they arrived and saw each other, they found out otherwise. Tate then explained that he had a plan to start a webcam business and wanted to make them to work as models for it. Two of them turned down his offer, probably miffed at being deceived, but two stayed and lived with him in his dinky little apartment to try out the venture.
Tate noticed that the women weren’t doing a good job of telling their male clients what they wanted to hear. For example, an old man would ask one of them what her type was, and they’d tell the truth: Prince Charming. Tate told the women to lie and claim they were tired of Prince Charming in order to lead the piteous old man into thinking that he was their type. Using this method, they could extract far more money from their clients. Tate eventually grew tired of trying to coach the women on what to say and gave them a fake keyboard, telling them to pretend to type on it while he would sit out of camera range and type what the man wanted to hear. This was how Tate, in his own words, “raked money out of the Internet.”
Tate claims to be straight, but most straight guys would think that doing this makes a man questionably straight. Assuming Tate is completely straight, then perhaps what enabled him to overcome his sense of disgust is the fact that psychopathic people get more dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, the brain’s pleasure center, when anticipating monetary rewards. Perhaps he simply wanted the money too badly to feel uncomfortable with it.
Tate soon scaled up his OnlyFans operation, recruiting many more women and charging them 50% (elsewhere, he claims 66%) of their earnings so that he could help them extract more money out of their male clients. The way he did this wasn’t always strictly professional. In one video he admits to taking some women into his house as part of an OnlyFans harem. He claims he was doing the women a favor because before joining him, they were only making low wages in jobs such as waitressing, but with him they could earn up to $100 an hour on OnlyFans — while he took a cut of $200.
Tate also expanded his efforts to monitor the women and their efforts to extract money from their clients. Andrew’s brother Tristan, with whom he shares all his resources, reports viewing a camera feed of 40 of their OnlyFans models, in addition to a feed of the men to whom they were speaking. Andrew and Tristan peeping on sexually-aroused men mirrors the conditions Andrew experienced as a contestant on Big Brother, which was modeled on the totalitarian state that keeps all citizens under constant surveillance in Orwell’s 1984. So keep in mind that if you go on OnlyFans and talk to a woman, there may very well be some ghoul like Andrew Tate just off-camera, silently laughing at you.
To translate Tate’s activities into a twentieth-century context, he is a combination of Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy, and Gloria Leonard, a phone sex entrepreneur from the 1970s. The difference is that those two didn’t parade around claiming to be a man of God, as Andrew Tate now does. Being a Hugh Hefner/Billy Graham hybrid requires dodging more scrutiny than a kickboxer requires dodging blows.
Tristan tries to whitewash the nature of their OnlyFans business by claiming the women sometimes helped the men through tough emotional times, serving almost as their counselor or psychiatrist. However, in other clips he admits that they “get their titties out” for the camera. We don’t know how often the women got naked versus offered life counseling, but if the Tate brothers really wanted to help the men, they’d start a non-profit rather than an OnlyFans business.
Doing the math, if Tate’s 75 OnlyFans hoes worked 20 hours a week, generating $200 an hour for the Tate brothers, it means the Tates made about $15.6 million a year on it — and if they had been doing this since, say, 2018, then they would still fall far short of the $365 million he allegedly has. They obviously got some of there money from other means.
Tate used money from his OnlyFans operation to finance other ventures. In the video from 2019, Tate expresses interest in purchasing a casino in Romania. He arranged an agreement with mafia brothers who owned 400 casinos in Eastern Europe, where he’d put up the money to build a casino next to their competitor’s with their branding in exchange for giving them a cut of the profits. They agreed to it, but after opening, business was slow, so Tate, noticing there was a Starbucks nearby, advertised free coffee, and thereby drew not only gamblers but coffee-drinkers to the casino, which he claims was a big success. Tate claims the government shut down his casinos during the pandemic, so they weren’t so lucrative then, but they seem to be up and running again now, there being 15 which collectively take in about $12 million a year. Even with this money and his OnlyFans profits, it seems some of Tate’s fortune came from other activities.
The Tate brothers have money in NFTs and cryptocurrency and seem to have made some shrewd decisions with them. For example, Tristan Tate recalls withdrawing an investment from FTX, a cryptocurrency hedge fund which turned out to be a Ponzi scheme, because its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, fearfully waffled to a reporter as to why he only drove a Toyota Corolla despite being rich enough on paper to afford a Lamborghini. The Tates may now be profiting from wise investments, but the reason they had money to invest in the first place is because they were OnlyFans pimps.
One benefit to pornographers of operating in places like Romania is that they can get attractive white women for a cheap price. White women are the most popular on porn sites, but most of them live in expensive countries like the United States and Norway, where actresses demand high wages.
By luring women to OnlyFans, Tate has become a menace to the women of Romania. Romanian men see a mulatto/quadroon bragging about the wealth he made while turning some of their women into cam whores, and they probably get rather angry. This may be the real reason why the authorities imprisoned him. (Of course, the mafia brothers with whom they own the casinos are probably eager to become the sole proprietors as well.)
Once Tate’s stay in a Romanian prison is over, the authorities should expel him from the nation given he is not Romanian, let alone white. They should also confiscate most of his ill-gotten OnlyFans money and donate it to charities that might help the same sort of suicide-prone men from whom he got it. Ideally, they should keep him under some sort of house arrest to prevent him from using white women to make money via OnlyFans again.
Tate is becoming blacker as he ages, which helps to explain his shift from Right-wing politics to converting to Islam in 2022. Tate may have chosen Islam because he has many Muslim fans, and probably also wants to cozy up to the Muslim rulers of Dubai given that it’s a safe haven for him if he gets kicked out of Europe.
Some Muslims are accusing Tate of being a grifter. It’s a fair accusation, as only a few years ago he was praising Tommy Robinson. Changing one’s beliefs frequently is correlated with attention-seeking, which Tate has spent his adult life doing, both in reality TV and then in his YouTube shorts. If Tate is a grifter, it’s only up to a point, because the reality seems to be that he is a mix of a Right-wing white man and an African-American pimp. Polygamous Islam seems to be his way of reconciling his tendencies.
Tucker Carlson is supporting Tate, claiming that he hasn’t been charged with any crime. I hate to say this, but I agree more with the neoconservative Jew Ben Shapiro’s take on Tate, which is that while his criticisms of our anti-male society are good, his solution of becoming a polygamous OnlyFans pimp is bad. Shapiro instead advocates monogamy and taking a pro-social role in one’s community.
Andrew Tate is in fact a part of the so-called “Matrix” that he pretends to oppose. Elon Musk’s new Twitter allows him to have an account, for example. Likewise, while YouTube may have banned his channel, they allow his followers to post multitudes of his videos — while they are simultaneously and feverishly taking down nearly every videos of Jared Taylor, Greg Johnson, and others of the dissident Right. Racial nationalists and white advocates are the real people who are outside the Matrix. Tate may be very honest regarding some aspects of gender, but he’s not honest enough overall to get himself banned.
People should not admire Andrew Tate. Those who never retreat from actions into words — i.e., those who do useful things for society such as engineers, software developers, scientists, nurses, mechanics, electricians, carpenters, etc. — are far more deserving of respect.
If Tate had laid low and not started casting himself as a self-help guru and social commentator, then perhaps he would still be a cyber-pimp. (There’s a reason why most pornographers lay low.)
Alternatively, if he had never become an OnlyFans pimp and had simply become an outspoken representative of what is politically incorrect, he may have been blackballed from lucrative employment, but he probably wouldn’t be incarcerated right now. Tate’s problem was that he didn’t want to give up the lucrative OnlyFans income or forego being in the public eye. His attention-seeking and greed got the better of him.
Regardless of his wrongdoings, Tate did a great thing in setting up a system that gets people to spread videos across the Internet. It is wrong for him to manipulate people into thinking they can become super-rich in the process, but it is nevertheless an effective way of getting one’s views noticed. People on the dissident Right should try spreading videos in a similar manner — not so much young men who need to focus on getting a good career and relationship, but rather established men who are already set up in life. They should take sound bites from dissident Right figures and try putting them on social media sites. They need to get themselves out there on the platforms that the youth consume, because if they don’t, then the future will belong to those whom the system doesn’t mind letting us see — such as Andrew Tate.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
The Union Jackal, May 2023
Orgasmus coby zbraň? Pornografie jako židovský antifašistický aktivismus a kulturní terorismus, část 1
Do Twitter’s Praetorian Guard Still Serve the Old Emperors?
We Can’t Save the Earth Without Reducing African Birth Rates
Remembering Emil Cioran (April 8, 1911–June 20, 1995)
The Rise and Fall of Andrew Tate, Part 3
The Rise and Fall of Andrew Tate, Part 2
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 528 Karl Thorburn on the Bank Crashes
James, thank you for a well-researched and compelling read. I confess I never paid attention to this guy. He clearly has more red flags than May Day on Red Square. This leads me to question the judgment of the people who defend him. Like Roosh V., he is a non-white selling cuckold porn to an adoring audience of white racists. Astounding!
My take as well. A sober and articulate investigation of a name I’ve encountered (including here at CC), but really didn’t care enough about to research for myself. Tate seems like a NWO archetype. Mixed-race and unusually impressive genetically (I’ve known men both very tough and very smart, but it’s an uncommon combination), but typically spiritually adrift, and thus weak in moral character – the logical end result of atheism in an environment of social atomization and general deracination and rootlessness. Maybe not quite as bad as Brett Easton Ellis’s American Psycho, but of the same “family”.
Looking forward to Part 2.
The fact that many right wing people support Tate was always mystifying. Ironically, while Tate espouses a supposedly “masculine” message; a truly masculine society would drive him out or worse. Kudos to the Romanian authorities for taking their own side.
Shapiro instead advocates monogamy and taking a pro-social role in one’s community.
What good does it do to advocate for monogamy when the agents who have the power to enforce it incentivize women to cheat and leave their husbands? Advocating for monogamy is like advocating for electoral transparency in a state controlled by Democrats.
Regardless of what you think about Andrew Tate, his ideas are grounded in reality. Women do not practice monogamy anymore because they don’t need a husband to care for them. They have jobs, which are provided for them via government programs, and a court system that can strip their husbands of assets and income. They don’t have to worry about accidental pregnancies.
Is Andrew Tate supposed to pretend that we’re living in Mayberry and all women want are good, responsible providers?
I’m not going to deny that Tate says some good things, but he’s a bad role model for most guys because the best they can do is pair up with one woman.
I plan to cover some of Tate’s ideas in the next part of this series in case you’re interested.
the best they can do is pair up with one woman.
In some circumstances it is but if you live in the US, Canada, Britain and pretty much every other Western country you’re putting your faith in a system that doesn’t punish women for infidelity. It rewards them morally (it’s “empowering”) and financially for it. It only punishes men for infidelity.
If Andrew Tate told his audience that the best they can do is pair up with one woman, they would want to know what to do if the woman decides that she doesn’t want to be monogamous. Men can’t discipline women for cheating on them. If a man is wiped clean by his wife, it’s hard to start another relationship with a woman, especially if he’s on the hook for child support and alimony.
That’s what I don’t understand about these tradcons on the dissident right. On the one hand, they can see that the deck is stacked against whites. They can see that whites are held to a higher standard of conduct than non whites, but they don’t receive any perks for it. They can see that the culture preaches anti-white hatred, that whites are passed up for jobs because they are white, that whites are assaulted by blacks because of propaganda and a corrupt judicial system. But on the other hand, when it comes to dating and romance they want men to trust the system even though it does essentially the same thing to men as it does to whites. It’s biased against them.
Tate can’t tell men to be monogamous, unless it is in select circumstances (e.g. if they are getting married in Saudi Arabia, an Amish community, or a place where women need husbands to survive), because there is nothing to check women for being unfaithful.
When you figure out the system is stacked against you, you have two choices. You can keep feeling sorry for yourself, or you can work to create a better system. But realistically, if you work to create a better system, you are not going to be the one who benefits from it, especially if you are at the beginning of a very long struggle. As far as I can see, most manosphere discourse comes from people who realize they are screwed and who divide themselves into two camps: the sociopaths like Tate who want to “get theirs,” thus strengthening the system, and the vast majority who simply continue to feel sorry for themselves, which usually sinks into self-destructive behaviors.
I agree that the odds are stacked against you but then it’s your respondsibilty to adapt to those unjust circumstances so that they become more advantagious for you. For instance you can use surrogacy and have children with great white genes, that no one can take away from you, and as a single “mother” you can get a lot of benefits from the state. Improvise, adapt and overcome.
I live in the US and I’m happily married with two children. I’m not a celebrity or an alpha chad. It is possible if you work on yourself and choose your mate wisely.
There is a place for generalities, obviously (we are, after all, race realists here). But there is also a point at which broad-brush painting of groups is detrimental and reckless.
Detrimental to whom? To decent white (especially young) men who need to find good mates.
It is reckless to tout the “all women are whores” angle because it threatens to derail and demoralize the same men, to deceive them, to waste their time and put them on destructive, hopeless paths.
* * *
Consider the following 2021 statistics…
In 2021, in the United States there were an estimated 32,990,000 women between the ages of 20 and 34. There were 31,460,000 women between the ages of 35 and 49.
That is 64,450,000 women!
Do you honestly believe that among sixty-four and a half MILLION women there are nothing but whores who 1. don’t want a good husband, 2. are incapable of fidelity, 3. are disagreeable, 4. would make terrible moms?
Let’s be super conservative and say that a mere 20% of those women are good ones. That is still 12,890,000 good women who want a good man to start a family with and love and be loved by.
(And that’s just women between the ages of 20 and 49. There were still 32,310,000 more between the ages of 50 and 64.)
* * *
Our guys need encouragement; they don’t need the histrionic memes of bitter edgelords (not that you are one of those). Yes, they must discern and avoid bad apples. But the “women suck, so be a ‘player’” stance just doesn’t add up.
So true – but also why I believe a white preservationist-retheorized and grounded Christianity is our only racial hope. It is absolutely not rational anymore for most young white men (or perhaps men of any age) in secular contexts to marry. Given the preponderance of such contexts, this is an obvious collective racial catastrophe (as demonstrated in collapsing white fertility). But how can we counter it, in one-moron, one-vote mobocracies, such as all white nations (outside of a very few in Eastern Europe) have become?
Essentially, we’re asking white women to give up their narrow self-interest (in women’s “lib” [I’m dating myself, lol!], in family court superiority, in sexual superiority, in personal liberty and economic independence) in order to re-establish the kind of patriarchal social orders on and through which our race and civilization flourished. But doing so is not in their interest, individually understood. Or, more precisely, it might sometimes be in their longer term interest (eg, to have happier and more fulfilling lives overall, especially in old age), but that requires a degree of wisdom increasingly rare in Western nations, and which is certainly not a majority sentiment.
I can only see two options, the same as obtain with every other macro-problem facing the West: reconquest or separation (the latter can be geographical or at least psychological and sociological). Either we somehow reestablish traditional social orders via martial or political conquest, or we re-form ourselves into “communities of racial virtue” where a concern for white natality (which presupposes an anti-feminist agenda) is paramount. I don’t see white nationalist/traditionalist reconquests on the horizon (obviously, if/when there is System collapse, everything comes back on the table; but when that will happen, I have no idea). Separation is our path for now. Our problem here, however, is that it may be a very long time until our people can actually geographically and political separate (assuming no System collapse). Meanwhile, each white generation is increasingly miserable and decreasingly fecund.
So, for the foreseeable future, and if we want our people to have an indefinite future, we need to find ways to persuade as many of our women as possible to “think intergenerationally” – to develop a new racial consciousness and ethics which will inspire them to subordinate voluntarily the exercise of present rights, personal lifestyle preferences, illegitimate power, and feminist privileges, to future collective racial interests. That is a very hard sell. The only major white group many of whose female members (but far from all!) seem to accept it already is the Christians. Unsurprisingly, conservative white Christians also have higher rates of marriage and family creation than white seculars.
This is why I’m increasingly obsessed with demonstrating the moral compatibility between white preservationism and Christianity, and especially, why I so strongly condemn those prowhites who attack Christianity or needlessly harp on points of antagonism between WN and the Faith. I believe many white conservative Christians have sound racial instincts, but are consciously muddled simply by virtue of the non-stop propagandistic regime they live under (I believe progressive Christians are as worthless as secular progressives). We can reach them, as long as we don’t foolishly alienate them. They will put their Faith ahead of their race – if we force them to. That is as much a fact as genes, morphology, history and IQ. But when there is in fact no incompatibility between Christianity and a positive white preservationism, why compel them to have to make any such choice?
And Christianity lends itself to forward, intergenerational thinking, and to the making of sacrifices and the subordination of selfish individual desires. Without such self-abnegation being practiced by a substantial pool of whites, and in light of global conditions (the racial breach of white nations; the Third World population bomb; global communications and transportation; and the Diversity ideology-cum-neopagan-cult), I see no way for our race to win its war for biological perpetuity.
If you think wrapping white preservationism in Christian rhetoric is our only hope, that basically concedes what the most fervent anti-Christians believe: that Christians are bad whites, incapable of working on anything of importance that does not relate to their faith and willing to sabotage such efforts unless they receive constant babying and pandering.
Does this apply with Christians in any other walk of life? Did the US military have to baby Christians to prevent them from deserting or turning coat in wartime, for instance? Do the police have to pander to the Christians in their ranks to get them to do their jobs?
Before any religious identity comes our racial and cultural identity. We must effectively promote and encourage positive identity formation. There was a 4th way school founded by an Irishman named Mervyn Brady. He was a champion of The West and used Western art, culture and great men as a pathway to awakening of the soul. It was very esoteric and not racially conscious. Yet, I believe that idea can be invigorated with a much more masculine, non-esoteric energy and could serve as a basis for our preservation. It naturally preserves, celebrates and studies our cultural heritage. It goes off when it merges with a more Eastern idea of the soul and reincarnation.
In short, we must celebrate our great men in every discipline and inspire our people to understand their greatness by charismatically teaching our history and lifting up our great men who will grow in numbers because they will be inspired.
Paul Waggener has a great recent podcast on this topic at his Call Sign Werewolf gumroad. It is titled Women. We need more men like Mr. Waggener to lead the way. P.S. I would love to see him destroy Tate the anti-white and cheap hip hop video character in a battle.
Positive identity founded in our history and myths and culture supercedes religion. We should be religion agnostic. What is important now is we preserve and develop ourselves and our people. That is our True North.
I was actually pretty happy not knowing who this dude was. I know, I know, I shouldn’t celebrate blissful ignorance but I’m doing it anyway.
I envy your blissful ignorance on this one.
An informative read, Mr. Dunphy. I appreciate people like yourself, gluttons for punishment willing to comb through the minutia of shits like this so the rest of us can get just-the-facts. It’s a real labor of love.
I have a request which is my request and my request alone. If you are married with children or never intend to be such and are on your preferred career track, then you have done your duty with respect to these things and can spare some time with political activism. I request that you share my articles on other websites using anonymous online accounts. Please do not notify me of doing so. Instead, do it silently on your own, and do it in a respectful, law abiding manner. The best way to do this is using a VPN, and, to start the account, a proton mail account, and, if necessary, a fake phone number, which can be usually found for free or or very little money. During the first three days that an article I have written appears on Counter-Currents, I request that you share it with four camps. The first is with Ron Unz and people who follow unz.com because his audience is large and intersects with the mainstream. The second is Nick Fuentes, who gets tons of views on Telegram. The third is Mike Peinovich’s therightstuff.biz because he attracts a big Zoomers following, and the fourth is Thuletide, who posts some good material. After three days, then share it among followers of Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, and Matt Walsh because they attract a lot of Zoomers in addition to followers of the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute because they attract a lot of intelligent people. Of course, you can send it to whomever else you want, and you can use the same method with other articles on Counter-Currents that you like. Finally, make sure you keep a file that lists the web addresses of all your accounts social media followers so that when moderators ban your account, you will have the option to start it up again, perhaps by reminding your followers of a phrase you privately sent them prior to being banned should you need to create another account. You will not get rich doing this, and in fact nobody will get rich doing it, but you may help change the minds of many.
This is smart. I mention CC in some of my postings elsewhere, but this sort of intentional reposting is even better. Let’s drag the Unz folks up a few notches.
I think this is a worthwhile experiment. If any of you want to take part, indicate below. That will give us an idea if we have enough people trying to produce any measurable results. Thanks James, and thanks to everyone who wants to try this.
I have been doing something similar to what he suggests, but on and off.
I get business cards printed with “It’s OK to be White” and leave them around like bread crumbs everywhere I go. Not sure how effective it is, but feels like I’m doing something. It’s also inexpensive. … my next lot will be something like “Immigration destroys home ownership”, or something similar.
This is great. Would you be willing to include web addresses of CC, AmRen, etc. so curious people can follow up?
There is a major issue here. The victory of feminism over white women’s minds is one of the major catastrophes for the White Race in the las 100 years, and perhaps even greater than the loss of the III Reich.
Feminism destroyed the nuclear family, destroyed moral standards in women, destroyed the will to bear and raise children, and thus is destroying the survival of our Race.
Incidentally, and I have to said it: there is something in white womens mind who makes them prone to feminism. And there is nothing we can do to change that.
Feminism didn’t change women, it unmasked them
there is something in white womens mind who makes them prone to feminism. And there is nothing we can do to change that.
Germanic and Celtic women come from cultures where chivalry is practiced. (Yes, non white men also simp for women – Will Smith being a prime example – but white men take it to absurd lengths.) Look at the way white men propose to women by bowing to them like they’re royalty and asking their permission for marriage. The gesture not only pays deference to the woman, it makes her the gatekeeper of marriage. It puts the man in a submissive position and no one ever questions this custom.
Calling a woman an insulting name, or saying something unflattering about her that may or may not be true, is not a crime and is certainly not deserving of violent repercussions by a man. Women do not have honor – they use slander as a weapon because they their character is assumed to be golden and they do not fear violent retaliation from men. There is no “honor” there to defend, but men risk life and limb to avenge a woman’s hurt feelings. All because of chivalry.
It’s beyond ridiculous that white men practice this secular religion because it gives Germano-Celtic women a massive sense of entitlement. That’s where their attitude comes from. It’s also why there is a “racist feminist” squad on Twitter. They know that gynocentrism can’t survive under non white rule. They want to be doted on by white men for existing.
White women have wombs, so they have the same instincts as non white women. They aren’t prone to feminism. The difference is that white men practice chivalry. Giving women “rights” that they did not earn is an act of chivalry.
When I first heard about this guy I thought he was both a sleaze and a creep. Quite a combo.
I will learn to spell my alias correctly. Like, right now.
I’ve yet to see anyone truly impressive coming out of the martial arts circuit. Sure it seems like the perfect breeding ground for stalwart overmen who embrace their masculinity in a healthy way, but the culture around it is barely out of the cage-fighting phase, and has too big of an ungentlemanly, non-white element, promoting wiggerish behavior even in right-leaning white male fighters like Colby Covington. I’d have to say the most respectable looking bloke in the martial arts world would probably be someone like Josh Barnett, but if he has any controversial opinions of his own, he’s keeping them well out of sight.
I have no interest in Tate. I still don’t know who the hell he is and I don’t care. But I noticed this comment on the side.
Agree, one shouldn’t expect too much from professional athletes.
The most interesting person in martial arts has got to be John Danaher. The guy is insanely intelligent, he must be the highest IQ person in the history of sports coaching. I know he studied philosophy before getting into Jiu Jitsu. And I know he’s not fond of political correctness. Even when he’s interviewed by gatekeeping moron Jews like Lex Fridman he still has interesting things to say.
Of course his most famous protégé, Gordon Ryan – ‘grappling GOAT’ is an extremely impressive athlete. He’s heavily influenced by Danaher, and says a few semi-based things of his own from time to time.
I suppose the cage fighting stage is the preferred end stage in its context. Whatever the rule set, competitive fighting is its own thing. Someone doesn’t need to be great human being to be a great champion, regrettably. And a culture where fans elevate the fighter’s status as a fighter above everything else creates its rather skewed value set.
It was Chaturbate, not OnlyFans. While not taking much away from the general message of your article, these sort of mistakes make you look very lazy and ill informed. Listening to a couple of streams about the guy (Brittney Venti’s are surprisingly good) would have clued someone in to the service he used.
A great piece, and I look forward to part 2. From my limited knowledge, Tate seems to me to be a psychopath. Manipulation, false empathy, fits of anger, an attraction to illegality. I have worked for a couple of guys who were psychopaths, and I would bet the farm on that. As for this – “People on the dissident Right should try spreading videos in a similar manner — not so much young men who need to focus on getting a good career and relationship, but rather established men who are already set up in life” – I think you may have a project…
From someone who followed PUA and manosphere thought, what differentiates the greats–Mystery, Roosh, RSD, etc., is that those groups were organic to a generation, a bunch of guys in the 00s, talking about interactions with girls. This then advanced to politics, the JQ and race, coalescing in the Great Meme War and Trump’s campaign. In the aftermath, all of these people were banned and persecuted.
Tate, is a regular conman (multi-level marketer, lol), who uses PUA and manosphere language. But with no competition–everyone else has been banned–and with severe masculine deficits in this current generation, there is no one to fill the void.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.