Print this post Print this post

Tyler O’Neil’s Making Hate Pay

2,845 words

Tyler O’Neil
Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center
New York: Bombardier Books, 2020

There’s a moment in the film 300 in which the Spartan defenders at Thermopylae allow their allies, the Arcadians, to take on the Persians. Despite recognizing their weaknesses as soldiers, King Leonidas begrudgingly gives the Arcadians credit for taking part in the fight. This is about how I felt upon reading Tyler O’Neil’s Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. O’Neil doesn’t always use the best arguments, nor does he always offer the greatest insights, but at least he picked the right enemy.

O’Neil makes it clear upfront that he is a conservative Christian. Given this parameter and the fact that the SPLC is known for unfairly targeting both conservatives and Christians, O’Neil is not shy about dishing dirt on his demographic’s indefatigable tormentor. Folks on the Right should be grateful that he crammed into one slender volume as much damning information about the SPLC as possible. Aside from offering historical information on the organization, he puts up a spirited defense of traditional Christianity and presents a convincing case to discredit the SPLC. This and a great title will hopefully make Making Hate Pay useful in the Right’s fight against this odious organization.

O’Neil’s main arguments include the following:

  1. The SPLC is a left-wing, partisan organization that targets the Right, often without a shred of justice, while largely ignoring the Left.
  2. The SPLC practices sexual harassment and racial discrimination in its own offices.
  3. The SPLC raises far more money than it needs, pays its executives lavish salaries, and keeps millions in offshore accounts.
  4. The SPLC exaggerates or fabricates “hate” in America in order to keep the donor dollars coming.
  5. The SPLC does not deserve the influence it has as a supposedly impartial arbiter of hate.

After chronicling the disastrous month for the SPLC that was March 2019 (the firing of founder Morris Dees and the resignations of President Richard Cohen and legal director Rhonda Brownstein, all under a cloud of sexual misconduct and racial discrimination), O’Neil dives into the sordid history of Dees. In a nutshell, Morris Seligman Dees (a white Southerner and not Jewish, oddly enough) had family in the Ku Klux Klan, supported segregation as a young man in the 1950s, cared only about making money in the 1960s, and once aimed a gun at a client in order intimidate the Grand Wizard of the KKK. One former employee referred to Dees as “manipulative, ruthless, [and] autocratic.” Allegedly, he had slept around the office while still married, sexually assaulted his own stepdaughter, was a dedicated swinger, and liked to play weird sexual power games with his wives, girlfriends, and gay men. But because Dees was (and perhaps still is) a brilliant fundraiser, no one on the Left ever cared to shake him off his high perch atop the SPLC.

O’Neil also goes over Dees’ Klan obsession, describing how the SPLC effectively bankrupted the Klan in the 1980s. But like a perverse Don Quixote always looking out for windmills, Dees could not stop reporting on his hooded enemies — just to keep the money flowing in from his clueless Yankee donors. It got so bad that, in 1986, his entire legal team quit in protest.

With the Klan more or less dead by the 1990s, the SPLC went on to more modern pro-white groups such as skinheads and Nazis, but also, to O’Neil’s vexation, conservative, pro-Christian, pro-life organizations:

Eventually, the SPLC married its liberal views with its anti-Klan reputation and added conservative groups to the “hate group” list. There were signs the SPLC might do this in the 1980s, particularly with pro-life activists, but the real movement came decades later, when the SPLC named mainstream conservative and Christian groups “hate groups.” Due to the history of Klanwatch and the SPLC, this arguably equates these organizations with the Ku Klux Klan in an extremely defamatory accusation.

This represents the main thrust of Making Hate Pay: getting conservative Christians out of the crosshairs of the SPLC, while at the very least not defending the pro-white or race realist organizations that the SPLC also disingenuously victimizes. This is not to defend the Klan, which did use violence to resist the SPLC in the 1970s and 1980s. But O’Neil comes across as a little disingenuous when he says almost nothing on behalf of non-violent pro-white activists and organizations that the SPLC also has no compunction in ruining. To be fair, he extends his concern to conservatives, even if they aren’t overtly Christian, such as the Center for Immigration Studies (which seeks to restrict immigration) and the Center for Security Policy (which opposes Sharia law). But that is as far as he is willing to go.

O’Neil gives us a nice review of the SPLC’s battles with conservative Christians over the years. He reviews events such as the Roy Moore-Ten Commandments controversy from 2001 and National Organization for Women v. Scheidler from 2006. He stresses often that most conservative Christians do not hate gay people simply because their religious dogma condemns the practice. As would be expected, O’Neill dedicates many pages to the thwarted terrorist attack on the pro-life Family Research Council (FRC) in 2012. This is a fascinating episode in its own right and represents the best evidence that the SPLC itself supports terrorism.

You can buy Spencer Quinn’s novel White Like You here.

After seeing the FRC on the SPLC’s “Hate Map,” deranged Leftist Floyd Lee Corkins entered the FRC offices in Washington, DC intending to shoot everyone inside. He wounded the building manager and would have done more had he not been apprehended. He later claimed that the SPLC inspired him to do the shooting. Although SPLC spokesman Mark Potok condemned the attack, the SPLC did not remove the FRC from its “hate map.” From this callous lack of regard for the lives of conservatives, O’Neil infers that James T. Hodgkinson’s near-fatal attack on Republican Steve Scalise during a baseball game in 2017 was also SPLC-inspired. Hodgkinson did “like” the SPLC on Facebook, and the SPLC did attack Scalise for a 2002 speech he gave for an organization that had been founded by David Duke. Yes, this is conjecture on O’Neil’s part, but it’s no worse than how the SPLC ruins conservatives for the flimsiest of reasons. For example, O’Neil notes how, since many on the “far Right” oppose transgenderism and repellent spectacles such as Drag Queen Story Hour, the SPLC lumps all people who oppose these things with the “far Right” and then endeavors to ruin their reputations.

O’Neil’s chapter on the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in 2017 is surprisingly informative. O’Neil mostly rehashes the events while keeping his distance from the Unite the Right people themselves. Still, he correctly blames the police and local government for not keeping the protestors and the left-wing troublemakers apart. He’s also quick to point out the violent and thuggish nature of the Left on display that day. Most importantly, he establishes a connection between the SPLC and Antifa:

Megan Squire, whom Wired profiled as “Antifa’s secret weapon against far-right extremists,” works closely with the SPLC, feeding the organization data on white nationalist and other groups. Squire does not consider herself Antifa, but “she is sympathetic to Antifa’s goal of silencing racist extremists and is unwilling to condemn their use of violence, describing it as the last resort of a ‘diversity of tactics.’ She’s an intelligence operative of sorts in the battle against far-right extremism, passing along information to those who might put it to real-world use. Who might weaponize it.”

Extremism researcher Eoin Lenihan mapped the Twitter interactions of Antifa activists, finding strong connections to SPLC reporter Michael Hayden. Cathy Young independently investigated Hayden’s work, specifically more than a dozen Newsweek stories he wrote in 2017 and 2018. “These stories do, in fact, closely fit Lenihan’s description of the work of journalists he labels pro-Antifa: ‘downplaying Antifa violence while advancing Antifa talking points, and in some cases quoting Antifa extremists as if they were impartial experts.’”

While the connection between the SPLC and the left-wing thugs that disrupted Unite the Right is tenuous, the way the SPLC directly benefited from the rally certainly isn’t. O’Neil shows how the organization raked in millions almost immediately after, and then used those millions to go on a deplatforming rampage against the Right.

O’Neil ends Making Hate Pay with a comprehensive list of lawsuits against the SPLC, much of which was covered in my essay from last year, “Suing the SPLC.”  Sadly, most of these are not going well. Two major ones (one by Baltimore attorney Glen Allen and one by the aforementioned Center for Immigration Studies) have been dismissed. Allen is in the appeal process, and the CIS is considering appeal. Gavin McInnes’ lawsuit is still ongoing. So far, the only success has come from Maajid Nawaz, a moderate Muslim whom the SPLC unfairly labeled as extremist, and Craig Nelson, a white boxing club owner who sued the SPLC for knowingly making false statements about him. Most attempts have proven futile, however, simply because when in court the SPLC resorts to what I call “the opinion defense.” When challenged, they claim that their right to smear people is protected by the First Amendment since it’s impossible to prove or disprove whether someone is indeed hateful. Yet, unlike Surgeon General Warnings on cigarette containers, the SPLC does not offer such a caveat on its Hatewatch pages, nor when it conspires to destroy its right-wing enemies.

As informative and useful as his Making Hate Pay is, O’Neil, like most conservatives, refuses to take the steps required to actually defeat the SPLC. O’Neil seems to think that the SPLC is a fundamentally good organization that has been corrupted by greed. He seems to think that rebutting the SPLC’s defamatory charges against Christians and conservatives will be enough to change opinions of those not already on the Right.

It won’t.

In the words of Kevin MacDonald, the SPLC is a “secular-sounding front for Jewish anti-White activism.” No explanation cuts to the quick better than this. The SPLC has engaged in anti-white identity politics for decades, and to oppose it in the belief that either it or its supporters are operating in good faith is naïve, to say the least. At least one person quoted in Making Hate Pay seems to understand this. O’Neil quotes former SPLC paralegal Randall Williams as follows:

Everybody seemed to be against the Klan. We developed a whole new donor base, anchored by wealthy Jewish contributors on the East and West coasts, and they gave big bucks.

O’Neil does not delve into the ethnicity of many of the villains in Making Hate Pay, but it’s obvious that Cohen, Brownstein, Potok, and others are Jewish. When reporting on the Democrats who repeated the SPLC’s anti-Christian talking points while opposing President Trump’s judicial appointments in 2017, O’Neil includes three Jews (Bernie Sanders, Diane Feinstein, and Al Franken), two blacks (Cory Booker and Kamala Harris), one Asian (Mazie Hirono), and zero whites. He never comments on this. Nor does he interview a single white nationalist or identitarian in his Charlottesville chapter. Instead, when discussing “the motivations behind the white nationalists in Charlottesville” he rather unconvincingly calls on a black professor to give us the straight dope.

Meanwhile, O’Neil documents not only the dishonesty of the SPLC, but their stated desire to never act in good faith. He includes Potok’s famous 2007 quote: “Sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring hate groups. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, completely destroy them.” He also demonstrates how Cassie Miller of the SPLC thinks entirely in anti-white racial terms:

“For far-right extremists, the increased visibility of transgender people is a sign of the growing ‘degeneracy’ of the nation, wrought by ‘cultural Marxists,’ leftists and Jews as part of an assault on white, Christian families and strict gender roles. They believe that trans people, like immigrants and non-whites, are hastening the destruction of an idealized white, Western culture,” Miller wrote.

Of course, Miller’s every word is correct; the rub appears when we realize that Miller and the SPLC see these admittedly anti-white changes as good things. It’s what they stand for, you see. Most tellingly, O’Neil relates how the SPLC defamed Craig Nelson simply because Nelson’s boxing gym was “designed to address the specific challenges unique to white males in the United States” yet was open to men of all races. In other words, the SPLC considers it hate if a person wishes explicitly to help white men while not refusing non-white men. Meanwhile, the SPLC has no issue with organizations such as the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Minority Health, which presumably caters to the needs of non-whites. This double standard is pure racism, and it is practiced by people who make a living decrying racism.

Further, by targeting the one group of people most responsible for building modern Western civilization (i.e., white men), the SPLC is proving itself to be dysgenic on the widest possible scale. Anything that explicitly benefits traditional white civilization, it opposes; and anything that explicitly harms traditional white civilization, it supports.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here.

Such an organization is not merely dishonest, hypocritical, unscrupulous, and greedy, as O’Neil demonstrates. It’s also irredeemably evil and dangerous. So are its donors, who are aware of the SPLC’s excesses and do not care. And all the fancy syllogisms and meticulously footnoted observations in the world are not going to change that. This is so because Liberal Diaspora Jews see the SPLC as the lesser evil against what they really are afraid of: traditionalist, nationalist, ethnocentric whites, whom they quite racistly disparage as Nazis. It doesn’t matter if the whites in question are perfectly innocent or oppose violence or have Truth on their side. It also doesn’t matter if the leaders of the SPLC lie through their teeth when they support the most noxious forms of degeneracy. As long as the SPLC opposes anything that could potentially lead to white ethnocentrism (such as traditionalism, nationalism, and, yes, conservatism), those big Jewish bucks will keep rolling in.

I’m reminded of the point Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn makes several times in Two Hundred Years Together: Jews the world over may not have liked the Bolsheviks, but they supported them because they saw Bolshevism as the lesser evil compared to the Czars. It didn’t matter that the Soviets were objectively more violent and oppressive than the Czars. It didn’t matter that the Bolsheviks murdered around 20 million white people prior to World War II in the Holodomor, the Great Terror, and in the Gulag Archipelago. It also didn’t matter that around 1.5 million Soviet Jews were murdered by Stalin’s government. No, what mattered was opposing traditionalistic, nationalistic, ethnocentric white people — as if they’re the root of all evil.

Liberal Diaspora Jews were like this a century ago, and they are like this today. This is a very simple and direct explanation for why such Jews continue to support organizations like the SPLC despite all the evidence amassed by O’Neil. And the only way to beat the SPLC’s anti-white identity politics is through not only pro-white identity politics but anti-Jewish identity politics as well. Of course, I am not advocating violence; instead, I am advocating for whites to be as anti-Jewish as the SPLC and similar groups are anti-white. This, to me, is common sense. With enough whites self-identifying as a racial group and distrusting the SPLC because it is loaded with Jewish money and populated disproportionately by Jews, the SPLC’s influence and power in our society will dissipate overnight. Just as Russian civilization was on the line a century ago, all of Western civilization is on the line today. The stakes could not be higher. Anti-Semitism may be an ugly word for many, but I would rather resist the world-ending degeneracy promised by the SPLC and be considered anti-Semitic than yield to it and be considered philo-Semitic. A stark choice, yes. I do hope it never comes down to that, but I am afraid it will.

Of course, all of this goes right past Tyler O’Neil. He’d rather reform the SPLC than remove it. By refusing to fight fire with fire (or, in this case, anti-white racism with anti-Jewish racism), O’Neil keeps his most potent weapons shelved, while the SPLC shelves nothing in its attempts to “destroy” the Right. This is why I consider conservative Christians to be weak and somewhat untrustworthy allies with the Dissident Right. Yes, it is nice that we share a similar enemy in the Left. And it is nice that Tyler O’Neil wrote this book. But conservative Christians really don’t want to fight the Left. By tacitly accepting the Left’s lie of racial egalitarianism, they wish ultimately to make a separate peace with the Left — and then throw the Dissident Right under the bus.

As much as I appreciate Making Hate Pay for its attacks on the SPLC, I found nothing in it suggesting that Tyler O’Neil would do otherwise.



  1. D.M.
    Posted March 20, 2020 at 7:30 am | Permalink

    This excellent review shows the deficiencies of stopping short of addressing the real, underlying problems (race and ethnicity), as civnats and Christians tend to do.

  2. Headz
    Posted March 20, 2020 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    My best results in the matter of agitation are when you say nothing but agree and encourage the next best radical around. Others will chip in. Bring the snowball to roll and after a while simply agreeing and agreeing with the even lukewarm talking points of lets reform the SPLC you slowly let the cat out of the box “you know i also realy agree with this Kevin McDonald guy”

  3. Utgard Loki
    Posted March 20, 2020 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    This was most informative and entertaining. I see the SPLC as a sort of pod person of the ADL. It performs the functions of the ADL, but there was always this worrisome religious or ethnic character written into the name of the ADL. The SPLC caught on as a way to secularize the institution so as not to draw attention to any potential ulterior motives, and was budded off like a clone. The adl commitment to Zionism creates for some leftists an irreconcilable contradiction in its root. An interesting inquiry would be to look into the interactions of the ADL and SPLC. How do they view one another? Have they ever worked together?

    One thing I find hilarious is when these Hollywood people say they are giving so many millions to the SPLC and the dumb reporters interviewing them always say “that’s a great charity.”

  4. Ambrose Kane
    Posted March 20, 2020 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    “This is why I consider conservative Christians to be weak and somewhat untrustworthy allies with the Dissident Right. Yes, it is nice that we share a similar enemy in the Left. And it is nice that Tyler O’Neil wrote this book. But conservative Christians really don’t want to fight the Left. By tacitly accepting the Left’s lie of racial egalitarianism, they wish ultimately to make a separate peace with the Left — and then throw the Dissident Right under the bus” – Sadly, as a Christian, I can say without hesitation that these words are the Truth.

    Christians today of every denomination are just as duped by multicultural dogma as the general mass of non-believers. They too believe in racial ‘equality,’ ‘there are no races except the human race,’ and all the other mind-numbing nonsense that most westerners believe. But perhaps it’s especially worse for Christians since so many of them are caught up in Dispensational theology which in practice results in an obsession with all things Israel. It also leads to the belief that unless Christians support Jews and the nation of Israel, they will be cursed by God.

    This is an especially hard shell to crack.

    What most people don’t know is that Dispensational theology is relatively new in terms of Christianity’s long history. Many Protestant Reformed scholars shake their head at the sort of lunacy and exegetical gymnastics that dispensationalists engage in to support their position. The point is, not every Christian is duped by the Dispensationalism of Schofield and those of Dallas Theological Seminary (which is the academic headquarters for Dispensational thought).

    More than that, one reading the New Testament fairly will probably not come away with the notion that the Jews are the best thing since sliced bread. Jesus’ condemnation of the Pharisees, including Paul’s admonitions against them, are quite telling. No one carefully studying the Scriptures should ever walk away from it thinking that the Jewish people are such great people. If anything, the Jews are more or less portrayed as a people who serve as an example of what not to do.

    Finally, there is nothing in the New Testament that demands or even suggests that Christians ought to give up their unique racial or cultural identity. Yes, it does call Christians to renounce pagan religious practices that are connected to polytheism and the like, but there is no call to abandon one’s own culture and those customs that make them a unique people.

    Moreover, there is nothing within its pages that urge Christian communities or nations to engage in multiculturalism. One would think that if racial ‘diversity’ were part-and-parcel to God’s will, there would at least be some very explicit passages stating it. But there is not a peep about such notions.

    I agree with the author that while we should not seek to physically harm Jews, we must seek “to be as anti-Jewish as the SPLC and similar groups are anti-white.” As a Christian, I can warn my family and children, including other whites, about Jewish subversion. I can share their history of parasitism and of their constant efforts to destroy Christianity and to bring ruin to white, western countries. I can do all of this and not have an ounce of guilt or remorse as a Christian.

    None of this means that Jews shouldn’t be reached with the Gospel message. They are still accountable for their actions and their collective rejection of the Messiah 2000 years ago. But I will not spend an inordinate amount of time on a people who refuse to learn the lessons of history, who do all in their power to reduce the numbers and influence of my race, and who are bent on seeing themselves as perpetual victims when, in fact, they are the predators of Gentiles. I will shake the dust off my feet and gladly turn to others.

  5. Mac
    Posted March 20, 2020 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    “This is why I consider conservative Christians to be weak and somewhat untrustworthy allies with the Dissident Right.”

    If I were to be exceptionally charitable towards them I’d say they were controlled opposition but, outside of that artificially sugar coated framing, my view of them is much more dim. If I had a nickel for every time a conservative christian lied by omission, downplayed the negative influence of or made bold faced lies about jews I would be a multimillionaire right now. If the LifeWay statistic that 46% percent of Americans believe jews are god’s chosen is even remotely accurate then what I said is not an exaggeration in the slightest. Until christian judeophilia is the exception in America, instead of the norm it currently is, I will continue to view them as nothing more than useful idiots for jews & their religion as the Golem OS.

  6. Alexandra O.
    Posted March 22, 2020 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    I am furious with Christians for sending quadrillions of our dollars overseas to support missionary efforts to save the souls of the heathens and save the lives of the children playing in the mud along the Congo, all cheered on by Jewish groups to make themselves look good. What a lopsided, insane world we have.. I am glad yet another book has been published that points out this mess. Everything that undermines “The Plot” against our lives helps.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace