Tag: circulation of elites

1,142 words

“Gentlemen, despite the heroic efforts of Michael Tracey, Richard Hanania, Patrick Casey, Nick Fuentes, and others among you, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor fell today, a victim of CHUD moralism. We must redouble our efforts to quash this moral panic. As you go forth, always remember that we are fighting for the most vulnerable. Politicians, bankers, and crowned heads are counting on you. Not one of the Q-tards we fight is ever troubled by the question, ‘What kind of world are we leaving for Goldman-Sachs?’ That’s what makes us better than them.” (more…)

Frédéric Delavier

4,603 words

Frédéric Delavier is a French author of books on bodybuilding, who also became a philosopher. His book Guide to Bodybuilding Movements was first published in 1998 and was a worldwide bestseller, with over two million copies sold. It has been translated into more than thirty languages. He is also known as an educational and critical videographer on his YouTube channel. He recently published a treatise on philosophy, The Awakening of Consciousnesses (L’Éveil des Consciences), which is awaiting translation into English.

(more…)

1,188 words

Steven Brill’s Tailspin is cant and claptrap, less important for what it says than what it avoids.

There’s an old Twitter joke, or meme, called “Fellow White People.” It plays off how Jews in the media will call themselves “white” when it’s time to browbeat the goyim about racism, xenophobia, whatever. But when they want to talk mainly amongst themselves, and bang on about how they’re a special minority—well then! White people are the other, the enemy.  (more…)

J. P. Morgan

2,244 words

One of the more exciting prospects for the Dole-Clinton presidential contest should have been the “presidential debate,” which, ever since the Kennedy-Nixon slugfest of 1960, has titillated the mass electorate with the delusion that the voters actually have a real choice between two different viewpoints. The only reason a Dole-Clinton debate ought to have been exciting, however, is that it should have been interesting to see what the two participants could possibly disagree about. What exactly were they supposed to debate? (more…)