56 words / 3:02:07
Greg Johnson welcomed a panel of guests including Kevin Deanna, Roger Devlin, Kevin MacDonald, Tim Murdock, Mark Weber, and Frodi Midjord, to discuss the year that was 2025. The episode is now available to download or listen to here.
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
5 comments
I’m glad Kevin DeAnna sees how it is in the trades. You can weld your pipes all you want, it says nothing about the overarching societal problems. You don’t see women in these jobs, because they’re considered low status, not because women are incapable of doing them. Women are equally incapable of political and stem jobs, yet we have seen a massive increase of them in these fields in the last two-three decades.
As to the declining standards he mentioned, ten to twenty years ago the regulation standards were a lot higher. You did have a lot of bureaucrats with clipboards walking around major sites. There were also hypocritical aristocratic attitudes where they could wear high heels and flaunt safety standards while pulling others out on them. I’ve seen over the years many companies just lose hundreds of thousands in contracts based on the arbitrary whim of some of these people. Pretty much any construction project which goes through a local or national government has all the same people taking jobs off young white men still holding power, and still earning more money. The business owners that have to deal with them haven’t escaped it, it’s just more out of sight for the workers.
When people get hit with a fine, it can be devastating, I heard of one worker getting done for $5,000 for not wearing his helmet on a quadbike on a farm. Imagine being in the middle of nowhere, doing as you’ve always done, and out of the blue some government bureaucrat earning 3x your salary, takes one month of salary right off you. And they yell at you like you’re a peasant as they do so. I honestly think this has declined due to both the great replacement and the fact there’s actual fiscal problems in western countries now. The past managerialism was a luxury good that’s becoming too unaffordable.
The final annoying thing about the “Muh trades” crowd is it’s being used by browns and certain feminists to vindicate their anti-white male perspective. Because they themselves see blue collar work as being for losers, they see whites doing those jobs as proof that whites are dumb and stupid. Indians with their caste mentality think this right away. Going to the trades is floated as a solution by these groups, not because they think it’s good for whites, it’s because they are happy for white men to remove themselves as competition to the white collar jobs they themselves want. They’re classist themselves and see it as suckering their outgroup into accepting a worse position. The last thing they’d want is for white men to organize as a collective and push for good opportunities. When the jews were persecuted historically, they clung desperately to their niche in cognitive work. They didn’t give it up and become like the gypsies doing trade skills. Which minority diaspora group holds power today and which doesn’t?
Epic podcast
It must be difficult for a podcaster to resist the temptation to monopolise the conversation when a guest on another podcast. With multiple guests it can have the effect of not allowing the others to have a fair say.
Great discussion, but why use the feminist term spokesperson? Spokesman makes the point without throwing a sop to our enemies.
Other than that, you guys are doing a great job.
What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. — TS Eliot, from The Wasteland.
Best regards,
Stephen M McMillen
God Jul & Merry Christmas team CC
A few thoughts on the stream roughly in order of as they came up.
Greg you have my utmost respect for the work you have been doing for so long but I have to disagree with your take on Tucker Carlson. You come across naïve and giving him the benefit of the doubt. Tucker is not doing some tactic like your friend used to do on Facebook. Tucker is an OPERATIVE and a lot of people seem to be falling for it. I saw Warren Balogh carrying water for Tucker on his telegram channel recently. https://t.me/warrenbalogh88/12892
In my opinion, the Tucker Operation is basically that he is there to maintain status as one of the top thought leaders whilst managing the rise of White Nationalism. However, we can still use him for our aims. E.g. by using his credibility in the eyes of normie conservatives and sharing clips where he says the correct talking points. Ultimately he is not our guy.
However despite all that, I do think its wise for you to maintain a publicly neutral stance towards Tucker because there is a chance that he could bring you on for an interview at some point in the future. In that scenario, he would be having you on to gain credibility in the eyes of WN but it would still be a definite win-win.
People like Tucker and Vance might be trying to run out the clock. It sounds incredibly cynical of me to say that but I think its worth considering.
I agree with what you all said about the ‘learn a trade’ psyop. Obviously for some people it is their natural path in life and that’s great but its being used to deter young White man with high IQs to avoid college and in doing so miss out on being more influential in society/politics. I’ve even felt tempted myself at times, but I’m glad I did get my degree.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.