Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X that it would only take one phone call for President Donald Trump to end Israel’s attacks on Iran:
If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential. Israel must halt its aggression, and absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue. It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu. That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy.
If only it were that simple. The power of the Israel Lobby makes the prospect of the United States distancing itself from Israel extremely difficult. If Trump followed the Iranian foreign minister’s advice, picked up the phone, and confronted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, it would be a powerful signal that Trump was different from the Washington establishment beholden to Israeli interests. It remains to be seen if Trump has the strength to take on the lobby and Jewish power.
According to Professor John Mearsheimer, the Israelis set a trap for President Trump. While negotiations were taking place between the United States and Iran, the Israelis launched their strike. Kevin MacDonald offers readers an astute synopsis and paraphrase of Mearsheimer’s interview with Andrew Napolitano about the attack:
Trump was trapped by [the] Israelis—once [the] attack happened (against the president’s expressed wishes) the forces for war (Israel Lobby, etc.) were too much, so that he would have a political disaster if he disowned Israel. As I noted, “Trump is likely unhappy with what Israel did but will make the best of it and will defend Israel if it comes to that.” It has come to that.
Chris Hedges is convinced that war with Iran is folly. Hedges cited the neoconservative push that precipitated the disastrous wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya as proof that the loss of thousands of lives and the squandering of approximately $8 Trillion USD is evidence enough. Similarly, Tucker Carlson spoke with Steve Bannon about the prospect of US involvement in a direct war on Israel’s behalf with Iran and he speculated that it would end the Trump presidency and bring about the downfall of the republic. In recent months, Carlson has been critical of warmongering commentators on FOX News and in other parts of American Conservative Inc.
On Tuesday June 17, 2025, sources in Iran reported widespread internet disruption. Also on Tuesday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he expected an unconditional surrender from Iran. It reads, in all-caps, “Unconditional Surrender!” Commentators assumed he was referring to the Iranian regime. An anonymous White House official informed the press that President Trump decided to convene his National Security Council on Tuesday as well to address the current Iran-Israel war.
Benjamin Netanyahu publicly stated that regime change in Iran is a strategic goal and that the assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei would end the war. The notion that decapitation strikes will solve Israel’s problems is far fetched.
Initially, President Trump was ambivalent about the extent to which the United States would become involved in the Iran-Israel conflict. On Wednesday June 18, when meeting with reporters outside the White House, Trump addressed the prospect of the United States conducting air strikes on Iran. Trump responded with “I may do it, I may not do it. I mean nobody knows what I’m going to do.”
Although Trump ultimately did give the order for strategic bombers to hit the Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan during the night of June 21 and 22, 2025, there is a ray of hope piercing the darkness that is Jewish power. Trump is not on board with what Israel and the lobby really want: the destruction of the current Iranian regime, which is euphemistically referred to as regime change. It is a testament to the power of the Israel Lobby when a sitting president has to bomb a country to get them off his back, but that is the reality. He kept the Israel Lobby from crucifying him publicly and bought himself time and ruled out any sort of regime change via ground invasion and a full-scale deployment of American forces for a combined-arms attack on Iran.
President Trump was forced into the airstrikes by the Israel Lobby. Kevin MacDonald, like John Mearsheimer, emphasises the power of the Israel Lobby. MacDonald writes “Basically the Israelis trapped Trump because of Netanyahu’s pre-emptive strike and the power of the Israel Lobby in the GOP and the media, making it politically non-viable to oppose Israel.” Even though Trump’s resistance to the wishes of the Jewish state has been hesitant there is the hope that he will find ways of incrementally wresting power from the gnarled clutches of neoconservative and Israeli lobbyists.
As a result of these attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Americans were warned that their lives might be in Jeopardy in Qatar; American military personnel were attacked by Iranian missiles; among other events. According to Insider Paper’s Telegram account:
Trump administration was anticipating Tehran would retaliate after US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, and the president does not want more military engagement in the region, a senior White House official told CNN today.
Interestingly, though, Iran made President Trump aware that their retaliatory strikes would be limited in scale and designed to minimize damage and potential casualties.
On Monday June 23, President Trump wrote about the ceasefire on Truth Social:
CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!
In the same post, Trump continued:
During each CEASEFIRE, the other side will remain PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL. On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, “THE 12 DAY WAR.”
Predictably the Israelis attempted to violate the ceasefire shortly after it came into effect, which prompted a frustrated reaction from President Trump. During a brief media scrum interview on the White House lawn on Monday June 24, a visibly irritated president swore on camera. Trump said “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.” Despite these difficulties, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran has remained in place since June 25.
John Mearsheimer maintains his assertion that the latest US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, contrary to the narrative being pushed in the legacy press, will ironically ensure that Iran does indeed acquire nuclear weapons. Why would that be? Because every state that did not have nuclear weapons or gave up their nuclear programs were attacked by those beholden to the Zionist war hawks. Countries will push to acquire nuclear weapons in order to prevent invasion and destruction. Furthermore, air attacks alone will not eliminate the Iranian nuclear program.
Israel has been running amok in the region for decades confident that it can do whatever it wants. The absolute stranglehold that the Israel Lobby has on American politicians of the Left and the Right vis-à-vis the United States’ Middle East foreign policy has been acute for decades. In its hubris, the Jewish state has conducted genocide in Gaza, engaged in reckless military misadventures against nearly all of its neighbors, and precipitated the invasion of Europe and the wider west with unprecedented migrant outflows. The sooner Israel is brought to heel by a strong American president, the better it will be for United States and the Western world.

17 comments
I think one reason for the aggressiveness of Israel could be that they fear losing their foreign policy influence in the United States. As we know from surveys, the younger generations are more anti-Israel and do not (especially the colored ones) care about the antisemitism and nazi cards.
The Israelis might see this as their last opportunity to knock out their rivals and create a Greater Israel while they still have US on their side. I think after fully occupying Gaza they will start aggressively expanding their settlements and military presence in the West Bank.
The main counterweigh to Israel will likely be Turkey as Iran and its axis got wrecked and most of Syria is now in Turkey’s sphere of influence.
Instead of a counterweight to Israel, the Sunni powers (Turkey, Gulf States) are Israel’s defacto allies.
Israel’s long term strategy seems to be alliance with the Sunni states against Palestinian nationalism and its allies: secular Arab nationalism (Saddam Hussein, Qaddafi, Assad), Shiite Islamists (Iran, Hezbollah, Houthis), and Russia.
For many centuries Jews were loyal subjects of the Umayyad Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire, and they enjoyed a privileged status within these empires.
Shiites and Christians, on the other hand, were persecuted by the Umayyads and the Ottomans.
Shiite Islam, unlike Sunni Islam, has a tradition of antisemitism.
Shiite powers such as Safavid Persia have often allied with European powers against the Ottoman Empire.
Every Muslim invasion of Europe has been the work of Sunnis powers such as the Umayyads and Ottomans, not Shiites.
Every Muslim terror attack in Europe and America in the post-Cold War era has been the work of non-Palestinian Sunni jihadists – not Shiites, not secular Arab nationalists, and not the Palestinian resistance.
Before America and Europe free themselves from the control of the Israel Lobby, Jewish supremacists hope to establish a firm alliance between Israel, neo-Ottoman Turkey, and Salafist (Wahhabi) Saudi Arabia & Qatar. This alliance will fill the void left by the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, and will similarly function as the Great Enemy of the West.
This is the vision behind the Abraham accords. Jared Kushner has positioned himself to become very wealthy as a conduit of Saudi investment in Israel.
Nationalism, Shiite Islam and Orthodox Christianity are the West’s natural allies within the Middle East against the Jewish / Sunni Axis of Evil.
The regime change wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Yemen and Iran have not only served no American interests, they have been actively contrary to American, European and Christian interests.
Not only are Iran, Russia and China not the enemies of the American people, they are our natural allies against our real enemies, Jewish supremacy, Sunni jihad, and the left.
Russia, Iran, and China all supported BLM. They are not allies of white Americans.
A “natural ally” is someone whose rational pursuit of their own fundamental goals does not clash with your own rational self interest.
Jewish supremacy, Sunni jihadism and leftism all claim universal jurisdiction, and as such they all fundamentally clash with our aspirations. Ever since they came into being, these forces have always sought the subjugation of the European nations.
Chinese nationalism/imperialism, Russian nationalism/imperialism, and Iranian nationalism/Shiite theocracy, on the other hand, all claim limited jurisdiction, and as such do not fundamentally clash with our aspirations. These forces have usually been accepting of coexistence, albeit with clashes over spheres of influence.
We are the only ones who can ever be expected to take our side.
But there is a big difference between those who are fundamentally hostile to our existence as a free people, and those who are fundamentally indifferent to our existence as a free people (but who will strike out, sometimes stupidly from the point of view of their own goals, when they face hostility from the US government – stupidly supporting BLM in an attempt to spite ZOG, for instance).
Before 10/7/23, there was broad agreement among the three forces hostile to the existence of free White nations. All three supported mass immigration in Europe and the White settler nations, all three supported regime change wars such as Syria, all three supported German & American tribute payments to Israel, and all three supported culture war as long as the targets are Whites and Christians.
But October 7th weakened that coalition, at least temporarily. Sincere leftists and Sunnis hate what Israel is doing, while most Jewish supremacists support Israel.
Our task, as I see it, is to perpetuate this split and use it to advance our own liberation. We should isolate the single most dangerous adversary, Jewish supremacy, while not unnecessarily antagonizing lesser adversaries (leftists, Sunnis), and completely end counterproductive antagonisms with “natural allies” (foreign enemies of ZOG, Black nationalists etc.).
Foreign policy is a great sphere for activities along these lines. White Americans and Palestinians, for instance, face the same dilemma – in order for either nation to enjoy a dignified existence in their country of ethnogenesis, Jewish supremacy in the USA must end. We are two peoples who have been utterly propagandized to hate each other, and yet from a rational point of view we are “natural allies”. There is probably nothing which a Jewish supremacist fears more than an intelligent White American and an intelligent Palestinian having a polite conversation about their respective rational self interests. Fox News is not our friend, and the Frankfurt School is not theirs.
You are presenting a fantasy scenario in which China, Russia, and Iran are rational actors and are not actually engaged in anti-white propaganda and anti-American espionage.
The boot on my neck isn’t a Russian boot, or a Chinese boot, or an Iranian boot, or a Palestinian boot.
The boot on my neck is a Jewish supremacist boot. The boot on my neck is the ADL, the SPLC and Antifa. They are the ones who subject nationalists and conservatives in America and Europe to a regime of surveillance, stalking and harassment.
Pardon my skepticism of anyone who advocates the exact same same Jewish supremacist foreign policy as Alan Dershowitz, Jonathan Greenblatt, Chuck Schumer, Antony Blinken, and other passionate supporters of the ADL and Antifa.
The smoke I saw from my house rising for weeks after 9/11/01 wasn’t from a Russian, Chinese, Iranian or Palestinian attack. That smoke was from an Al-Qaeda terror attack – and now President Trump is shaking hands with and praising the Syrian leader appointed by Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Bin Laden’s second in command and successor as leader of Al-Qaeda.
Jewish supremacists and Al-Qaeda jihadists are not my friends. Russians, Chinese, Iranians and Palestinians are not my enemies. This isn’t a theory – this is a statement of fact, based on actions I’ve personally experienced.
You don’t get to choose your enemies. Sometimes your enemies choose you. You’d like to focus entirely on Jews and Sunnis for some reason, so you hand wave away the fact that Russia, Iran, and China have put you in their cross-hairs. But the truth is: they are your enemies too.
Relating all to your own personal experience is just a variation of navel-gazing rhetoric like “No mullah ever called me honky.” Sadly, of course, that’s not true. The Mullahs root for BLM. But even if it were true, again, geopolitics is bigger than your backyard. Sometimes, your enemies choose you.
The Wesr still nominally controls the Americas, Europe & Australasia with perhaps 500 million Whites. Our continued existence as the former hegemonic power, especially now that we are clearly so vulnerable (as Whites) & simultaneously so entrapped in the Zionist world strategy, makes us a target for subversion by all rational actors. Weakening the West is bad for White people & Jews. If we insist on fighting with both hands behind our backs by furthering Jewish nationalism rather than our own, can others be blamed for contributing to our decline, which is in their interests.
I like your comment, especially the thought and work that went into it, but I think it’s simpler than that.
What saved Iran in the recently completed phase of the Jewish war against it wasn’t that Iran was embedded in an array of well-chosen confessional alliances. It was that when many brave and patriotic men in senior positions were assassinated equally brave and patriotic men promptly stepped up to replace them, and when other men were attempted to be intimidated they refused to be intimidated, and the masses of people who were supposed to act like stupid traitors and call for the downfall of their own government instead rallied around their leaders.
With the right spirit, and enough of it, victory is possible. Without it, we will become like Syria, and no one would be able to help us even if they were inclined to, which I doubt they are.
I had that thought too. If the future of US government is AOC/squad types and the New York mayor guy, which may be inevitable in an electoral democracy, Israel might think that it’s now or never for achieving its long term objectives, ie ethnic cleaning of Gaza and West Bank, fragmentation of Syria and Iran, etc. Israeli power in the US may be in the final stages of its apogee. What would they do when there are 20 or 30 squad types in Congress? What happens when one gets in the executive?
As early as the 1980s, the Israelis were predicting that America would go down the tubes, therefore Israel needed to destabilize all their neighbors. The unwritten corollary was “…with American military power while it’s still available to us.” This is what the Oded-Yinon Plan was all about. America’s history from the 1990s on were all planned out for us, isn’t that cute? Starting trouble with Iran was part of the program, so this latest business was simply a resumption of the plan.
Basically it’s an acceleration of it. Smart people, though you have to hand it to them.
…retaliatory strikes would be limited in scale and designed to minimize damage and potential casualties.
…Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!)…
Great article! I find those two statements very odd! 🙃
That is an interesting observation that the attack occurred during negotiations. Was it literally during a meeting or simply during the time period? From what I gather, the attack was shortly before the 6th round of talks were supposed to start.
I was under the impression that Trump was sort of in on the ruse. He’s pretty chummy with Netanyahu. Mearsheimer and MacDonald seems to think otherwise, that Trump was serious about the negotiations and that this surprise attack did not help matters.
Unlike most in the “dissident right” or “whatever we are calling this thing” as Jim Goad put it, I’m actually for the most part well-disposed towards Jews and Israel. I will also admit, though, that Jewish behavior is often a cause of anti-Semitism; anti-Semitism is sometimes not some ex nihilo phenomena of baseless hatred against Jews. I may get a lot of crap for saying this, but I think whites interested in forming an ethnostate may find inspiration in Zionist Jews creating their own ethnostate which has done quite well for itself these 70 some years. INB4 it gets all this foreign money and donations. Okay, so what? Look what they do with it. Lots of science and technology coming out of Israel, more so than say Gaza.
That being said, I think this was a blunder on Israel’s part. I think Iran will eventually do a surprise attack of its own sometime in the next couple of years and then cynically say it’s up to Israel not to escalate the situation as God knows whatever disaster strikes. The timing is also very suspect. Netanyahu has been selling this war for 30 years now. For 30 years Iran has been months, weeks, days away from getting a nuke. When does Netanyahu finally strike? Two days after his government survives a no confidence vote by 2 votes. Yes, Netanyahu is that conniving and Machiavellian. I forgot where I saw this, may have been on here, that if someone tries to stab you and you survive you win. I feel like that is what happened here. I don’t see this having any long-term benefit for Israel.
Talking about Trump vs the Israel Lobby is like talking about Pontius Pilate versus the Jews. With whatever degree of reluctance, the former served the latter.
The non-Jewish official who does the bidding of the Jews is part of the extended Jewish phenotype, part of the historic culture of the Jews (including “the court Jew”), and part of the Jewish religion, in The Book of Esther and in the annual celebration of the feast of Purim.
The Jews have well-practiced methods of ensuring that it continues to work this way. (These means include planting Jews in the families of politically important non-Jews.)
We Whites have no doctrine, no regular, proven, and well-practiced methods of seeing to it that our politically important figures do not get influenced by the Jews.
Is it surprising that the team that plays this game of subversion and influence beats the rabble that doesn’t play?
I think it’s interesting that the scions of almost all the major political families are intermarried with Jews. The Trumps, the Clintons, the Bidens. Are the bushes? It’s almost as if they understand the importance of this in a way that we don’t.
It is true that they have a stubborn, resistant, religious history and character. They have displayed more illogical, fanatical extremism in their history than most of their Arab / Muslim neighbors, to the point of killing their own people. Going back to the Romans, their neighbors sadly at first accepted forced Roman rule with a sense of logic. Roman governor’s worked with their religious leaders to maintain peace for the sake and survival of their positions under the eye of Rome. They were not bought off by lobby’s since Rome had plundered their wealth repeatedly after every rebellious incursion (Josephus). Unlike other colonies, their dogged resistance lead to their destruction and forced expulsion for 2,000 years. Israel’s new state has not been around very long. Although our recent past government’s and Trump has allowed and fueled this old madness to metastasis once again for personal bribery, history does in fact repeat itself for fanatical governments, as for bad emperors (sometimes even good emperors).
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.