1,914 words
What started as an immigration raid at a Los Angeles Home County Depot last week has now escalated into a simmering civil war. Thousands of rioters in Los Angeles have been blocking traffic, throwing rocks at law enforcement, setting cars on fire, committing arson, looting businesses, smashing windows, surrounding the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center, and launching explosives at law enforcement, all the while waving Mexican flags. I’m sure anyone who’s turned on a television set or glanced at their phone in the past few days is fully aware of not only what’s going on, but what the mainstream media and their leftist enablers want you to believe is going on.
At first, they went with the threadbare “mostly peaceful” story, which was false on its face, and directly contradicted by California law enforcement. Some even claimed there wasn’t a riot goin’ on at all. Then they blamed it all on Trump for enflaming the situation by deputizing the California National Guard and deploying 700 marines to restore order—as if things weren’t enflamed already. As of June 10, after four days of rioting, less than 100 people had been arrested. This may seem like a small number; then again despite many injuries no one has been killed (yet), and so I can understand the patient approach by the feds. Why escalate things further when they may still de-escalate on their own?
Five years ago, the rioting mob’s casus belli was the fentanyl overdose of apprehended career felon George Floyd. Today it’s President Trump’s standing deportation order of illegal aliens, especially criminal illegal aliens. Clearly, Trump has learned his lesson from his first term and is taking these disturbances more seriously this time. He acted swiftly and assertively as soon as possible to stop the riots. He also has the backing of the American public. Hence our simmering civil war—two armed factions of the American elite stand opposing each other in the streets.
This is unlike the Summer of Floyd in which the left ran rampant across a number of American cities. Back then Trump, I believe, was preoccupied with COVID as well as with his numerous political imbroglios and didn’t know what to do. And the right, still reeling from the disastrous Charlottesville rally, didn’t even show up. It was a successful flex for the left. These days, however, thanks to Trump’s acquisition of a backbone, the leftist threat isn’t quite what it was.
According to independent journalist Anthony Cabassa, a local city councilman witnessed ICE agents set up a staging area outside of a Home Depot in Paramount, California. He posted video online, and told his followers to come out and peacefully protest. Things then escalated quickly from what may have been a spontaneous display of First Amendment rights to a destructive riot perpetrated by organized groups of leftist thugs, including Black Lives Matter, the Party of Socialism and Liberation, and the Democratic Socialists of America. Local teachers unions have also been distributing masks, food, and water to the rioters. And the left has been closing ranks over this. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, Representative Maxine Waters, and Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum all spoke out in favor of the “protests.” California governor Gavin Newsom opposed Trump’s actions and even dared Border Czar Tom Homan to arrest him. But the escalation into chaos was suspiciously quick, as if the rioters had big money pulling the strings behind them. They weren’t merely demolishing pavement to produce chunks concrete to hurl at police—no, there are reports that bricks had been shipped to riot locations on pallets. There’s even footage of high-grade tactical gear, including bionic masks, being dispersed among the rioters.
The Gateway Pundit suspects that lefty propagandist and billionaire Neville Singham is funding much of this. National Conservative suggests that communists Leah Greenburg and Ezra Levin of the organization No Kings are also behind the riots, as well as the upcoming nationwide demonstrations which are supposed to take place on Saturday, June 14. Others are pointing to Christy Walton of Wal-Mart. Oddly, National Conservative is not finding many Hispanic organizations funding the riots—it’s mostly blacks or Jews. The House Oversight Committee along with online autiste sleuths like Data Republican have been following the money from the rioters back to their sources. Singham has been asked to appear before Congress and has been threatened with a subpoena if he does not comply. Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will be deploying tactical units to five blue-state cities, hopefully to head No Kings off at the pass.
Of all reporting on these events, I have found Ed Dutton’s the most persuasive and profound. As would be expected, the Jolly Heretic took the “evolutionary perspective” and described the riots as “inevitable” and as the “South Africanization of the United States.” And of course, it all boils down to race.
Hispanics have essentially set up a separate society within Los Angeles and within California. A separate society. There is no integration. They have maintained their own language. They have maintained their own customs. They have maintained their own food. They have maintained basically […] a Mexican or more broadly at least a South- and Central-American enclave within the United States, in which there is no integration.
When you’re a minority anywhere it tends to elevate your sense of ethnocentrism. The things that elevate ethnocentrism are stress in particularly mortality salience, but also feeling excluded from the broader society these elevate ethnocentrism and they elevate religiosity the two being related to each other. So there ends up being a strong feeling of camaraderie among fellow Mexicans in this place, and among just fellow Hispanic Americans whatever you want to call it. Latin Americans.
Now, send people in to what they regard as their area as their enclave to take away fellow Latin Americans and you can see that the result is to perceive this as an attack on them, as an attack on all Latin Americans. It’s a very basic evolutionary response. And one of them, a city council woman, who, of course, was Hispanic, actually said that that if you attack one of us you attack all of us. And they don’t care about the fact that these people have broken the law. They don’t care about the fact that these people are in the country illegally. The point is these people are part of their ethnic group. As far as they’re concerned the white Americans are dominant. The white Americans are a kind of an invader, really.
Dutton goes on to describe how rallying against Trump’s deportations and waving the Mexican flag raises the self-esteem of low-income Mexicans. This is in spite of the obvious inconsistency of professing loyalty to the nation you fled from and hostility towards the country that takes you in. The math is inescapable. If the Anglos can deport some Mexicans, they can potentially deport any number of them. This will ultimately depopulate Mexican dominated areas in the United States and lead to the loss of territory. For any self-identifying ethnic group, this is death. Resistance becomes primal, tribal, and ecological. It’s why blacks vote Democrat despite how the Democrats make life objectively horrible for them. Democrats allow blacks to ruin their own neighborhoods through crime, poverty, drug abuse, corruption, and neglect so that non-blacks stay away. Thus, black neighborhoods remain black.
Except when the Mexicans come in. It’s not often reported on, but for the past several decades, Mexicans gangs have been ethnically cleansing blacks from their neighborhoods in Southern California—often in violent fashion. The Southern Poverty Law Center has even reported on it. So it makes perfect sense that these Mexicans take umbrage at Trump’s immigration policies. They feel that their neighborhoods belong to them. After all, they won them fair and square in clashes with blacks, to say nothing of the reconquista dreams of those of them erudite enough to know basic history.
Dutton concludes by stating how humans naturally divide into groups based on shared ancestry, and then claim territory. Trump, as the representative of Anglo-American interests, is attacking Mexican territory, territory which is de facto Mexican despite still being politically part of the United States. He’s basically giving them a choice: fight and remain alive as a distinct people, or submit and face oblivion through assimilation or deportation. Of course, from an evolutionary standpoint, only the former option is viable.
Taking Dutton one step further, we must now ask all white Americans if this is what we want. Trump may seem radical with his immigration stance, but he’s radical only when compared to his predecessors—including, sadly, Ronald Reagan, whose shortsighted amnesty of 2.7 million Hispanics in 1986 arguably kicked off the Latinization of America. By objective standards, however, Trump is not radical at all. He’s actually quite mild. He’s sticking to the law and prioritizing the deportation of illegal criminals, such as gangbangers, drug dealers, and human traffickers—which would presumably make Mexican neighborhoods safer. He doesn’t care if you came here from Mexico, as long as you came here legally. There is nothing chauvinistically white in any of his rhetoric. Yes, he implicitly represents white interests, but he also represents the interests of non-whites who can live up to historic Eurocentric standards of civilization. This is where Trump diverges from the Dissident Right, despite the right-wing avenger persona he has taken on since dodging a bullet one year ago.
So if this is the way Mexicans react to mild and reasonable immigration pushback, there really is no pleasing them, is there? They haven’t the slightest concern about white interests or the desires of whites to have a safe, orderly, crime-free country. To them whites are outsiders and not worth considering. Thus, the only way to settle accounts with them is to become every bit as unreasonable as they are, and—I hate to say it—fight them tooth and nail in the streets. Is this what we want? Do we really want to engage in zero-sum power struggles, caveman style, with the country’s largest ethnic minority? Today it might not seem so bad when we have a president willing to deploy the military to stop them. But what about in twenty years when we don’t, and they will be in the absolute majority? What then?
This multiracial model of civilization cannot be maintained. Sooner or later urban disturbances like the Summer of Floyd and the LA ICE Riots will start happening with greater regularity, and in red-state cities to boot. Eventually, whites will have nowhere to run and nowhere to hide, and will have to face the same dilemma that Mexicans in LA are facing today: fight and survive, or submit and die. Is this future that we want?
Or perhaps we can avoid such a future by simply ceding parts of Southern California and Arizona to the Mexicans now. How can they say no when they wave Mexican flags? How can they say no when Mexican leaders in Mexico are proposing to annex part of the United States? Of course, such an action would be a boon for whites because it would kick off a cascade of blue-state secessions once California is effectively removed from the Electoral College, ultimately achieving the ultimate goal of Red State Secession. When the dust settles, the redrawn maps will reveal a whiter, stronger, core United States, one that could more easily be slow cleansed into a white ethnostate.
All of this starts with Calexit. And it cannot happen too soon.
34 comments
Land is cheap, racial security is valuable. In general I’m very in favour of balkanisation of large multi-ethnic states like America, Russia, Brazil, China, etc.
The issue here is that that’s not what the protesters are asking for, even if Dutton’s argument is correct. What you’d get with an actual Calexit secession therefore is an abandonment of whites in those lands and an increase in chimpouts like this in the rest of America due to emboldened minorities. If it were an amicable racial split like Marcus Garvey used to campaign for then sure.
I think we should crush them. Drive them out. Let’s have a real conflict that has some value for White America. California is one of the greatest places in the world. Ceding it to darkies would be a tragedy. And it won’t fix the problem. We’ll just end up with another alien ethnic state on the North American continent to go along with the de facto alien enclave para-states (NYC, Baltimore, Detroit, Atlanta, etc) that will be an even bigger problem down the road.
Stop kicking the can.
Agreed. Keep California.
Let’s take Baja California, too.
Correct. We have to kick them out, and by force. After all, that’s what the mestizo monsters and Amerindian savages openly say they want to do to us Whites – as if they could ever carry on with any kind of advanced, modern civilization without Whites.
Growing up in L.A. I’ve had a front row seat when it comes to witnessing the savagery and yes, downright stupidity that typifies 90% of “hispanics” – and that includes a good portion of so-called “white hispanics”. These people as a group are useless and dangerous.
I’m afraid that by the time a critical mass of American whites have the committed mindset to go Gaza on Southern California it will be too late, too late to prevent a long and bloody war. Yes, I would love to keep CA, but ceding the southern parts of it which are dominated by Mexicans now is at least politically possible and much less outlandish than mass ethnic cleansing. It’s a peaceful solution, which in itself might outweigh its drawbacks.
Of course, ceding territory like this would be worthless if the resulting red state America does not have a whites only immigration policy and language insisting upon a white supermajority on page one of its constitution.
“It’s a peaceful solution, which in itself might outweigh its drawbacks.”
Spencer Quinn, I fear that the “peaceful” part would only be temporary, if there were any peace to be had at all. As other comments noted, Mexicans/Hispanics/ (browns — whatevers) around the country would be emboldened and probably attempt to seize even more territory. I don’t know the solution. I only know these invaders do not want peace with us; they want us gone.
Well, okay. But such unilateral actions would mean civil war, and most nonwhites would side against us. Do we have a critical mass of whites right now with the appropriate mindset and resources to prosecute such a war? I don’t think so. If we did, then yes, maybe mostly undoing the last 40 years of hispanic immigration in our southwest would be justified, like you describe. (I’m guessing 20 to 25% if them are white enough to assimilate).
In either case, however, it would require a civil war which likely would be as devastating as the last one. I would like to avoid that. Instead we cede enough territory today to lose the majority of Hispanics, blacks, white liberals, and Muslims, and then fight like hell politically to keep what’s left white in perpetuity.
That’s basically my logic for supporting red/blue state secession. It’s by no means a perfect solution, but it would entail the least amount of bloodshed, especially considering that in the war you propose, we could possibly lose.
In this particular scenario, all of these groups would probably fight each other over territory. The exception would be the white liberals. They would attempt to emigrate to a white ethno-state, but would still cling to their beliefs regardless of the reality of the situation.
“It’s by no means a perfect solution, but it would entail the least amount of bloodshed, especially considering that in the war you propose, we could possibly lose.”
Spencer Quinn, I’m not proposing any kind of war; as I said in my comment, I don’t know what the solution is. I do know that there is no appeasing enemies who want us disempowered, and preferably dead. On the trajectory we are on, we going to lose. I’m certainly not attempting to argue you out of your position, just pointing out something that I thought of in response to it.
I want this entire planet. Let the coloreds have semi-sovereign micro statelets like Fiji, San Marino, or Liechtenstein depopulated to Amish or Eskimo numbers. We’re not giving shit away to them anymore. How much longer are we going to duck and dodge the inevitability of violence as the only solution to deal with these fucking people? That’s all they’re about, and it’s the only thing needful Whites refuse to their own deaths to be about.
In the movie Death Wish the character played by Charles Bronson asks his son-in-law what it means when people cut and run at the first sign of conflict. The son-in-law responds: that we are civilized? To that Bronson just shakes his head and says: no.
Haven’t seen Death Wish but I’d add: what does it say when those in the face of open anti-you racial genocide not only refuse before running but either support and forgive their destroyers cause the scary R-word lurks above ready to pounce on intimidated White minds? As the most heavily armed population in the world in the social media age, high on sloganeering bluster as subbing for action. “From my cold dead hands (too often suicide), these colors don’t run (White flight), Don’t mess with Texas (see Californians and mexico), Freedom and Liberty (like covid?), and the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of…(that means against the police, your heroes cuz BlueLM)…yawn…as the nose behind the curtain laughs and mocks.
”…as the nose behind the curtain laughs and mocks…”
That is a brilliant metaphor for jewish machinations. 🙃
Death Wish I (1974) is a must-see classic.
🙂
Douglas Mercer: June 13, 2025 In the [1974] movie Death Wish the character played by Charles Bronson asks his son-in-law what it means when people cut and run at the first sign of conflict. The son-in-law responds: that we are civilized? To that Bronson just shakes his head and says: no.
I cannot speak to the recent Jew-produced remake of Death Wish but I always enjoyed the original where Bronson’s White protaganist character hunted down and violently dispatched the niggers who had raped his daughter and murdered his wife. The NY Times review of that movie at the time contained this pearl:
…Joseph Delon, 30, of Brooklyn, an Oriental who described his occupation as “bum,” shouted so people entering the theater could hear: “This is the worst picture I’ve ever seen in my life. A white man can get away with anything in America. I’ve never seen so much racism in a nloyie —six blacks get killed for every wiiite.”
His 30‐year‐old black wife, Vonnie, who was carrying their month‐old daughter, Nia, added, “This picture stinks. I wish we had our $8 back.”
One quibble here. Deportation is NOT death for these guys. They have countries to go back to, where they’re already citizens in fact. Every normal country protects its borders, and these dears are upset that we’ve begun to protect ours again at long last.
It is an easy temptation for those on the right to ditch California. They cite the bad demographics of the state, the lunatic ideas that come out of its cultural producers, and the crime and other problems. This is wrong. California is not lost, and the state is worth fighting for.
Amputation is only a viable treatment if the cut removes the cause of the problem. In the case of Calexit, the cut won’t remove the underlying problem. The problem isn’t immigrants, legal or illegal, it is the presence of Third World populations in First World America, regardless of immigration or citizenship status. This problem affects every part of the nation. Maryland’s Eastern Shore has Mexican laborers, Minnesota has Somali, Connecticut has Guatemalans, and this is a simplification of a very complex problem. Should Calexit become the solution, what about expelling some part of Iowa that got a garbage truck load of refugees in the early 2000s? Iowa is in the center of the country; it is simply not viable to create new nations there.
The next problem is what part of California should exit? All of it? Should that be the case, large chunks of good land with a population of Old Stock Americans will go to a newly independent California.
What is the viability of a newly independent California whatever its final shape and size? It is entirely likely that an independent California which has a large Third World population and a group of leftist utopians in charge will go off the cliff. Property rights will very likely vanish. That is the end goal of “land acknowledgements” – they aren’t just empty slogans. The Third World post-Calexit population will be unable to maintain the current standard of living. California’s utility companies provide services to customers who can’t or won’t pay the bills, thereby losing money. The state is heavily taxed to pay for all those Third World people. The situation is fiscally unsustainable.
An unstable area like post-exit California invites foreign intrigue, a Chinese or Russian hypersonic missile base in independent Los Angeles will be a problem that requires a military response. In such a case, the entire Cali-America relationship could come full circle, a new war will be required to reconquer what was once ours.
While researching one of my articles I ran across some literature from a prominent white advocate from the 1980s, who referenced t the Third World status of Washington D.C. in one of his publications. I’d forgotten how bad D.C. was in the 1980s. It was notorious. There was a time with the capital district was almost entirely sub-Saharan. The government was corrupt, every time a poor Negro who dindunuffin died resisting arrest, the fires and rioting would follow. Crime was rampant. One could by crack a block from the White House. It’s not that way anymore.
Perhaps the only good thing George H.W. Bush did as president was turn around the situation in Washinton D.C. It started when he ordered the FBI to “get” Marion Barry, the sub-Saharan mayor. They did so, arresting him smoking crack with a hooker in a setup. Then there was a call to get Congress to directly rule D.C. – no local (sub-Saharan controlled) government or self-rule to resist. With Barry gone, the Federal Government slowly started getting blacks out of the district with Section 8 housing vouchers. Then housing projects were condemned, its Third World residents removed, and the land was repurposed by things like parking lots and hotels. Blacks suspected a plot, called The Plan, to remove them. They were probably right, nonetheless, D.C. is much whiter now and it is far safer.
Demographics can change. It isn’t a one-way street of nice and white to Third World. The part of Missouri called Little Dixie had a large black population, that’s gone. South Carolina was mostly sub-Saharan until the early twentieth century. Kentucky had large black populations across the state. Much of this is due to changing farming technology, but yes, IT CAN HAPPEN. The only thing we need to do now is study what worked in the past and then extend the final removal location to a zone outside the United States.
And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
The same thing that happened to Jackson, MS a few years ago during the water crisis that city had. When they can’t get any water, they will blame it on white flight or some type of racism. It would really get bad if they had another wildfire season in the future.
Broadreach: June 13, 2025 And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
Good question, one our folks rarely ask.
Wars have many levels of tactics. One guerilla sabateur tactic I’ll always remember, using “economy of force,” since our side is so outnumbered, was in a conversation I enjoyed with Tom Metzger 30 years ago. Tom had lived in Fallbrook, California, near San Diego, until he eventually became the last White man in his formally White neighborhood and the GD SPLC stole his house; He relocated to Indiana to be near family there.
Tom has suggested, bomb the dams; flood southern California and thirsty invasive Mestizos will scatter back to their own homelands like roaches at night when the lights are turned on. How would that affect White Californians? We don’t know.
Collectively, dams in the Colorado River basin can hold four to five times the river’s annual flow, generating hydroelectricity and supplying irrigation and municipal water for over 35 million people.
Dams can be rebuilt but slowly, the way California’s failed high-speed rail project has progressed. See how WikiJews describe that mess, here: California High-Speed Rail – Wikipedia
Hamburger Today: June 12, 2025 I think we should crush them. Drive them out. Let’s have a real conflict that has some value for White America…
—
You and what army, Wimpy?
Will Williams: June 13, 2025 at 7:46 pm
I have experienced some difficulty lately with quickly editing a comment once submitted and noticing misspellings, etc. But this comment, below, did not appear at all when submitted. Fortunately, I save C-C comments in my email Drafts in case this happens, so I resubmit it now, thanks:
Broadreach: June 13, 2025 And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
[…]
This duplicate comment that did not appear when submitted has been removed.
Will Williams: June 13, 2025 at 5:03 pm
Broadreach: June 13, 2025 And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
This duplicate comment that did not appear when submitted has been removed.
Will Williams: June 13, 2025 at 5:03 pm
Broadreach: June 13, 2025 And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
[…]
”…despite many injuries no one has been killed (yet),…”
That is because the government only uses lethal measures on white people. 🙃
Like Ashli Babbitt. January 6th 2021 she was shot by a black Capitol officer Michael Byrd. He got away with it. Liberals and blacks didn’t give a damn, in fact they probably celebrated her death. When just one black palooka gets shot (often for legitimate reasons) by police, liberals and blacks are outraged and seek riot and revenge. When Whites get shot, it is just an individual that was shot. No reason for outrage. No grounds for riot and hard feelings. Mainstream, normie Whites are far too complacent and easygoing. That doesn’t help. That kind of attitude actually invites more contempt and violence.
Oh, those pesky jews are at it again; the jews will not stop until every white man, woman, and child are raped, beaten, butchered, killed, and erased from history. 🐍
And the raceless normies will still be talking of peaceful remigration, pay-to-leave schemes, ethnopluralism, ceding territory to muds-anything but fire fought with inferno brutality against a conquering enemy. How are they any different from some gullible White college girl giving humanitarian aid post-hurricane in haiti, gets raped and beaten into a coma by savages, then wakes up only to forgive her violators? “This wasn’t a racial incident (yes it was), god luvs us, we mustn’t give in to hate…”
I think it would be funny to see the looks on Lefty faces when, after Calexit, the population votes to join Mexico.
…and then deports THEM!
I don’t care if California goes; my only concern would be the giant Redwood, and Douglas Fir forests—non-whites would destroy them out of spite. 🙃
They can’t manage ecosystems or forests, just like they can’t manage infrastructure. Hati is good example; it has a lot of environmental degradation. The wildfires they had earlier in the year is another example. They let the fuel build up in the brush and vegetation, while the equipment and infrastructure to fight fires were in disrepair. I doubt that they learned anything.
I have experienced some difficulty lately with quickly editing a comment once submitted and noticing misspellings, etc. But this comment, below, did not appear at all when submitted. Fortunately, I save C-C comments in my email Drafts in case this happens, so I resubmit it now, thanks:
Broadreach: June 13, 2025 And what will happen to future ill-run Southern California when its supply of northern fresh water is cut off?
—
Good question, one our folks rarely ask.
Wars have many levels of available tactics. One guerilla saboteur tactic I’ll always remember, using “economy of force,” since our side is so outnumbered, was in a conversation I enjoyed with Tom Metzger 30 years ago. Tom had lived in Fallbrook, California, near San Diego, until he eventually became the last White man in his formerly White neighborhood and the GD SPLC stole his house. Not to be defeated, he relocated to Indiana to be near family there and continued his work for our race until his last breath.
Tom had suggested, bomb the dams; flood southern California and thirsty invasive Mestizos will scatter back to their own homelands like roaches at night when the lights are turned on. How would that affect White Californians? We don’t know.
Collectively, dams in the Colorado River basin can hold four to five times the river’s annual flow, generating hydroelectricity and supplying irrigation and municipal water for over 35 million people.
Dams can be rebuilt but slowly, the way California’s failed high-speed rail project has progressed. See how WikiJews describe that mess, here: California High-Speed Rail – Wikipedia
—
Hamburger Today: June 12, 2025 I think we should crush them. Drive them out. Let’s have a real conflict that has some value for White America…
—
You and what army, Wimpy? ;o}
I have lived in California my entire life, and have just finished packing for a relocation across the country. Countless other friends and family have elected to join with me.
I describe California as a successful experiment. The system experimented with what would happen if Communism, unregulated non White immigration, corrupt politicians, public drag queen events, etc. were allowed to run free and control a state. The system is planning and actively working on our extinction and they just confirmed that the ” California Model” works. It is a waste of precious time to attempt and fix California and other states like it. No truly Pro-White community can have success in California as countless laws, and importantly the culture is geared against Whites.
Racial Separation is the key to our victory, California is not conducive to this goal. The beautiful hills of Tennessee, where the National Alliance calls home is more than suited for White living space. The National Alliance is now building a real-world White community whose goal is not only explicitly White living space, governed by ourselves alone, but also a spiritual revolution that will make that community progressive — and eternal.
You can learn more about the Alliance’s goals and consider joining here: NATALL.com
Excellent comment Dillon. I wish you well in your new endeavor, I know you are going to do great and make a real difference.
Presumably no matter what solution we come up with, most white people in America will be Christians. So presumably that would be reason enough for you to naysay any possible solution. This is you, painting yourself into a corner.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.