1,055 words 
Donald Trump easily carried both the popular vote and the Electoral College in this last election. He was aided by three trends that the GOP should understand well if they wish to have what the Democrats had from 1932-1952, an era of total dominance in federal elections. Firstly, the neglect of the older generations in favor of the hyper-politicized white youth–a very risky strategy. Secondly, white asperationalism among white-adjacent minority groups, especially Hispanics. And finally, what few seem to be addressing, a consistent growth in popular support since 2012 for Republicans in the face of stagnant popular support amongst the Democrats (assuming we write off 2020 as a stolen election that has very little useful data). These trends can be long lasting if they are fostered and bode well for a Republican-dominant era.
Let us first look at voting by age in this election. While Trump did better with older voters than younger voters, he closed some of his gap among the young while Harris closed some of her gap among the old. This is a highly risky strategy, as the old have a higher voting turnout. But it is likely to bear long-term fruit, as the youth are the future. The Left understands this and plays the long game. In recent years the Left has not only relied on nonwhite immigrants but has created a whole new demographic of, pardon my French, unfuckable women who have bought into a sort of bioleninist, self-destructive ideology, essentially becoming nuns of the state, in a way reminiscent of one of the Democrats’ traditional client groups: black women. The reaction to this new demographic of Leftist basket case young women is the rise of what some have called the “zoomerwaffen,” rightwing Gen Zers who are antifeminist and often tribalist. These young men (and to a lesser extent women) are high propensity voters, despite being young because they are hyperpoliticized by the Internet. They are the right-wing answer to the left-wing college brat. Despite Gen Z still voting minority Republican, this generation is only going further to the Right, as is the trend with all generations.
Trump underperformed with the elderly, which reflects the Right’s new branding: “the kids are alt-right.” While no one wants to lose votes, it’s clear from Cthulhu “swimming to the left” for decades, perhaps centuries, that securing the young and idealistic over the old and static is the correct long-term strategy for any movement that wishes to actually exert its will on the world. What we are seeing is the embrace of a right-wing futurism being installed unwittingly by those too old to understand the cultural revolution that they will help usher in. I suspect that the silent generation neocon, the MAGA boomer, and Gen X Qtard will have little lasting impact on spirit of this age.
The second trend that carried Trump to victory was of course the Hispanic vote. In spite of the infamous Puerto Rico joke at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally, Trump actually won the male population of this demographic and didn’t do horribly with the women either, certainly in comparison to black women who voted for Trump in the single digits. Commentators have explained this as working-class people voting on kitchen table issues, but a few have been brave enough to bring up the metapolitical elephant in the room which is white aspirationalism. The Hispanics who wish to assimilate into white society are turning to the Republicans as the white normative party (a fact that everyone but whites recognize) while those who associate with their home island, urban blob culture, or even black ghettoized culture, side with Democrats as the party of the “other.” They, like most minority groups in the US, are happy to sit at the kids’ table under the tutelage of elite East Coast urban whites and Jews.
Pundits who have no understanding of race have rung alarm bells for years about the danger of embracing white identity politics because of the increasing size and power of minority populations. It turns out this may not actually be true. In fact, I suspect that the GOP giving some time to explicit white interests would not only increase the white turnout but possibly also the turnout of white adjacent minority groups who actively wish to ally with the core American native population. It has been said that Hispanics often simply prefer the strong horse, and whites exerting themselves politically is certainly stronger than the status quo.
Luckily for Republicans, the two demographics that they have a potential advantage in, whites and Hispanics, also happen to be by far the largest demographics in the US. Through explicitly embracing white identity, the Republicans can have their cake and eat it too.
Finally, if we inspect the popular vote, the Democrat share has been relatively static since 2012 while the Republican share has been consistently increasing by millions every presidential election cycle. I am omitting the 2020 election from our dataset for obvious reasons. As white progressives have been weeding themselves out of the gene pool, Democrats have relied on replacing the native white population to memetically continue their social project. This has clearly had little effect on voter turnout as, again, their vote share is stagnant. Meanwhile Republicans have easily kept up, leading to Republicans winning the popular vote for the first time since the post 2003 surge of patriotism in the 2004 election. One wonders how heavily the political disparity in birthrates play in these numbers. At this rate, and factoring in the fact that Trump’s increasing popularity can be explained by his gradual rehabilitation in the normie public mind, could we expect continued popular vote blowouts until the Democrat Party is unviable and forced into a complete realignment?
These new trends, if capitalized on by the GOP, could spell the long-term defeat of the Democrats under a coalition which spans from centrists to white identitarians, led by a counter elite of New Right fellow travelers. It turns out that most sane people, or at least most sane white people, want pretty much the same thing. All roads lead to Rome, whether that be the preservation of culture, meritocracy, geopolitical stability, an efficient government, a lucrative economy, or a healthy environmental and agricultural system. Whether the GOP has the courage to take advantage of this potential is something that is yet to be seen.
3 comments
This is good news but what comes of it if the Republican Party remains antiwhite?
Joe Gould: November 15, 2024 This is good news but what comes of it if the Republican Party remains antiwhite?
But, what if?
The GO’s landslide victory against the crazy Democrats certainly is a good sign, if temporary, while Trump drains parts of the swamp, but there will be much resistance from nearly half of sick America to his effrts in “our” terminally corrupt system of government.
The GOP will remain anti-White because Trump’s picks for his cabinet, ambassadors and advisors are solid Israel-Firsters. He and they are in the Jews’ pockets and will remain pocketed as long as their masters control the purse strings, which they will.
Wolf Stoner, our ethnic Russian National Alliance member and experienced racial nationalist, has this unique view of President-elect Trump, combined with what President-for-life Putin — both anti-White — will eventually succeed in doing to present global politics, racially speaking.
I fully agree with your position about the elections. Trump is a Jew-puppet but he is perceived as a de-facto pro-White candidate. The whole Trumpist movement is an expression of the latent racial identity feelings among mainstream Whites. Definitely, Trump will not save America and will not be able to “make America great again” but the whole Trump phenomenon has triggered social changes that, eventually, will destroy the Zionist-American Empire.
Putin and Trump, despite being the part of the system, have become the icebreakers that mercilessly destroy the post-WW2 anti-White system. It doesn’t mean that they want it. On the contrary, they ardently wish to preserve it, but their very ardor only accelerates the process of destruction. I hope that this couple will wreak global havoc of unprecedented scale in the coming years.
I have a lot of agreement with this article, save for one thing. Right-affiliated dissidents really need to stop the generational name calling and blame game. It turns so many people off who otherwise agree with most, and often everything, we talk about, even if not always openly (this is people of all ages groups).
But this isn’t the main thing I want to address. The main thing I wish to address is the very real, very obvious fact that White Democrats have anchored themselves to this obsessive pity-love of a single demographic, black people, and it has become their albatross. Blacks wield tremendous power in local metropolitan government in many cities, but they have very little power in national politics. They have relied on the guilt of white people for national interests, and there is evidence that this guilt is withering away. Young white people who have grown up watching their black counterparts coming to school wearing $300 sneakers, $100 weaves, weekly visits to nail salons, smoking expensive cigars and driving European luxury cars, and watching black athletes and rap “musicians” making millions upon millions. They don’t see the little pickaninny with matted up hair using the “blacks only” water fountains from the 1940s. Because that has never existed in their eyes.
So the Democrats have anchored themselves to an ultimate dead-end…but they also anchor themselves to these very same young white (and black, and Hispanic, and Asian, and Indian etc) women that the article cited. The battle lines that the Democrats work to draw are gender based, and that’s why 2 of the last 3 nominees have been women.
I suspect that the strongest glue that continues to hold the White Democrats together is gender and sex based. Urban, affluent white women LOVE homosexual men (of all races). They LOVE the gender-fluidity stuff. They LOVE pretending to be something other than “straight” themselves, because there’s little to be sacrificed for women, and sometimes much to be gained, by being touchy-feely with other women in front of their desired men. And when they get angry and frustrated with men, they’re able to satisfy their social nature by engaging with the gay and lesbian “community.”
So the future strength for Democrats is going to be drawn from the indulgent, narcissistic, dysgenic, reprobate nature of urban women and homosexuals. This is why the blue islands are urbanized wastelands.
So yes, the Republicans do have an opportunity to focus on young white men and women who don’t have face tattoos, excessive piercings, and purple hair, but who also envision their own lives being traditional, family oriented, monogamous, children, no divorce, comfortable middle class home, stable roots etc. And yes, these “aspirational” people will gravitate toward what has always been, and away from the ever-greater freak show that the left has become.
This is, and always has been, a divide oriented around the “kinds of people” who gravitate one way or the other. I hate leftists because of who they are. I always have.
Oh one more thing. If I can’t have a wholly white ethnostate, I’d rather have Hispanics than blacks. Just today I saw an Oreo cookie commercial with a black Santa Claus. I’m so sick of our people’s heritage, our myths, our traditions, our European identity, being wiped away and replaced, for no reason other than misplaced guilt, and weakness. I don’t see Hispanics demanding this from us. I think they respect European culture, because for many, their roots are a blend of Europe, Christianity, and native mezzo-American history. There isn’t an embedded hostility on the same way as blacks feel it.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.