Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 588
The Future of the Movement, Part 2
Counter-Currents Radio
158 words / 1:15:29
In the second half of our latest broadcast, Greg Johnson and David Zsutty (Counter-Currents, Telegram, Twitter) of the Homeland Institute (website, Telegram) turned to a more general discussion of politics, current events, and Counter-Currents’ recent movement poll. The recording is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:00:59 Question on black-pilling and the demographics of Counter-Currents readers
00:17:23 The human body as a metaphor for race relations
00:21:00 Would white people be better off if Donald Trump loses?
00:33:38 Results of the Counter-Currents movement poll
00:38:06 On the political potency of White Nationalist polling
00:43:13 Using personality psychology to target rogue elites
00:45:55 Trump was a class traitor
00:47:37 What’s sacred in America is Jews
00:49:35 Question about White Nationalist women
00:55:43 Why don’t Asian countries have mass immigration?
01:01:45 Why did the white elite turn on us?
01:05:00 Are Counter-Currents readers psychopaths?
01:07:27 Question about Right-wing Jews
01:11:34 Reader comments
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
5 comments
Mobilization. Political pressure groups. Radicalization. Now we’re talkin’.
Interesting discussion when it comes to the military takeover.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity_movement
While counter-currents draws people in and has our backs it leaves a lot of people out that are allied in some ways but not in others , i.e., the UK Conservatives . In doing that I believe it will lose any streetwise momentum to get these needed changes going. It will divide.
We’re a magazine commenting on politics and culture, not a political coalition.
Thank you. A valuable online magazine C-C is. It is not an organization, however.
Nationalvanguard.org ( NV) is the online magazine of the National Alliance organization (NA) that has been around for 50 years. NV began as a print tabloid back in the 1970s, not as interactive like our online magazine is today, though its editor, NA founder and chairman William Pierce, would respond selectively to occasional readers’ letters in the print versions of NV to establish or explain NA policies.
Some NV readers are not NA members or even supporters which is reflective of the nature of the Internet, but they are steered to NA’s, the organization’s, sites where they can join NA if they agree with its ideology and program and pledge to support them. My point: NV.org is not an organization, though some ‘Netizens believe it is.
Greg, I enjoyed listening to this show, but I take issue with one of your statements: “You do not make a movement stronger by making it smaller.”
I may have misunderstood you, but a successful movement will begin with a vanguard core group that has a winning strategy that everyone in the core is in agreement with. There’s that word again.
We are not in revolutionary times yet. The greater racial nationalist movement will grow around that serious vanguard when the time for assembling without compromising on fundamentals comes. We’re not talking about the GOP certainly, nor the MAGA crowd that is all over the board and only marginally pro-White. Many MAGA types will come our way, but not now, not until their personal situations becomes more desperate.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.