
Nathan Perlman, the Jewish New York Congressman who teamed up with Jewish organized crime to take down the German-American Bund in the 1930s.
1,444 words
The expression “Punch a Nazi” originated in early 2017 when then White Nationalist figurehead Richard Spencer was sucker-punched by some cowardly antifa goon while giving an interview. For many months after, the Left crowed about all the glory that comes with punching Nazis while fretting ever so slightly about things such as free speech and freedom of assembly.
It was a pretty sick time that I’m sure many on the Right would prefer to forget, but shortly after that incident, a handful of articles appeared which discussed a time in American history when punching Nazis in the streets was actually a thing. A good thing, according to these articles.
In 1936, Jewish New York Congressman Nathan Perlman was getting annoyed at the success of the newly-formed German-American Bund. Founded that year by naturalized US citizen Fritz Kuhn, who was a German war veteran, the Bund promoted Hitler’s policies, staunchly opposed Communism, and supported American neutrality in the impending war in Europe. They enjoyed growing popularity, especially among German-Americans who vividly remembered the discrimination and abuse they had received from their countrymen during the First World War. Very soon the Bund had 25,000 dues-paying members and was holding rallies across America, especially in the Jewish stronghold of New York City. They looked the part, too, with sharp, military-style uniforms and an insistence upon loyalty and discipline. They were also quite outspoken about the disproportionate control Jews wielded over Christian America.
It’s understandable why Perlman was getting annoyed, but there was little he could do, since the Bund was also very patriotic and law-abiding. Like any other American group, they had every right to march in the streets, give speeches, and distribute propaganda.
And then Perlman got his big idea: Punch a Nazi.
Perlman paid a visit to Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky, a high-IQ lowlife for whom he had great antipathy since Perlman had recently helped to end Prohibition, which had been Lansky’s bread and butter for many years. But as one boychik to another, they got along well enough for Perlman to offer Lansky a job: “Disrupt the meetings and rallies of the Nazi finks and beat ‘em up using whatever weapons you need: clubs, bricks, bats . . . You know the drill. Just don’t kill any of ‘em. We’ll pay you nice for your efforts and give you protection in the courts if you need it.”
Lansky turned down the cash and did the job anyway. He was a mensch that way, apparently. Lucky Luciano and the Italian mafia offered to help, but Lansky turned them down, too, saying that this needed to be a “Jewish fight.”
I don’t know if “fight” is the right word to describe heavily-armed criminals and tough guys ambushing innocent, unsuspecting Americans exercising their First Amendment rights. You be the judge. From All That’s Interesting:
Lansky enlisted fellow mobsters Bugsy Siegel and Mickey Cohen to deploy their men to those locations where Nazi Bund rallies were held. They mainly focused on New York City and attacked Bund leaders and foot soldiers at the rallies, and spread enough fear in other Nazis to foster a reluctance to attend similar events in the future.
The mobsters would even place their attackers in strategic locations before a big speech; after the featured Bund leader or associated speaker began, the attackers would bum rush the stage and bludgeon all of the speakers in front of the crowd.
At the same time, Nazi-punchers would surround the meeting grounds, and then burst in through back entrances or climb fire escapes and beat up stunned members in the crowd. Lansky and Siegel even formed a training organization to teach people how exactly to make these efforts successful.
One of Lansky’s men reported the following incident (from the same article):
The Nazi scumbags were meeting one night on the second floor. Nat Arno and I went upstairs and threw stink bombs into the room where the creeps were. As they came out of the room, running from the horrible odor of the stink bombs and running down the steps to go into the street to escape, our boys were waiting with bats and iron bars. It was like running a gauntlet.
Sadly, these strongarm tactics worked in the short term. What was the Bund to do? Recruit members of the non-existent German mafia to clobber members of the Anti-Defamation League? Perhaps readers can enlighten me in the comments, but I have not found much online on how the Bund responded to this violent anti-German abuse. And all of the sources I’ve found portray the Bund as nothing less than sinister, and therefore deserving of such treatment.
This article reports that some Bund members resorted to relatively low-level violence, as well as to some truth-telling when it came to Jews:
At a meeting at the Germania Club in Lincoln Park that drew 1,000 participants in February 1938, William Kunze, the head of the Bund’s publicity office, declared that Jews, representing 4 percent of the population, controlled the press, radio, movie studios, schools, courts, and finance. Asked how the Bund proposed “to eliminate the Jews,” Kunze urged that legislation could be passed along the lines of those that excluded Asian immigration to the United States, adding that this might not be necessary “if the Jew learns his lesson.” During the meeting, a storm trooper from Glenview smashed a reporter’s camera. Two students were assaulted when they refused to salute the Nazi flag.
The article goes on to describe how Bundists defensively beat protesters whenever they crashed their rallies — and nowhere could I find instances of the Bund sabotaging other rallies in the way Lansky and Perlman did to theirs. In one case, Bund members “violently attacked a Jewish-American protester who charged to the podium as Kuhn was speaking.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eq9yst4W-6c
If this is the worst the Bund can be accused of, then compared to Lansky and his Jewish goons, they come out smelling like a rose.

You can buy Greg Johnson’s New Right vs. Old Right here
Sadly for the Bund, in 1939 New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia conspired with then District Attorney and future presidential candidate Thomas Dewey to investigate the Bund’s taxes and — lo and behold! — they found that Fritz Kuhn was embezzling money from the Bund. But of course they did. I don’t care to speculate on the veracity of the prosecution’s case, because if a government is capable of hiring vicious mobsters to violently undermine the First Amendment rights of innocent Americans, then it is capable of framing the high-profile Bundesführer Kuhn. Maybe he was guilty, maybe not. In either case, he was convicted and tossed in jail. After the Second World War, which spelled the end of the German-American Bund, Kuhn was deported back to Germany, where he died in obscurity in 1951.
The injustice that was perpetrated against the German-American Bund is even worse in retrospect when considering the time period. It all happened before the Second World War. The Third Reich had not committed even a fraction of the crimes against humanity that the Soviet Union had. By 1939, the Soviets had already murdered 15 to 20 million of their own citizens in terror famines and the Great Terror. They had unjustly imprisoned millions more in their ghastly gulag system as well. Did Perlman and Lansky conspire to bust heads at events held by the pro-Soviet Communist Party of the United States of America? Did La Guardia and Dewey care to investigate the finances of Congressman Samuel Dickstein, the man who headed the House Committee on Un-American Activities and who harassed German-Americans while on the payroll of Stalin’s murderous secret police, the NKVD? Those people were much greater threats to America than the German-American Bund. The Bund merely opposed anti-Christianity, Communism, war, and the disproportionate Jewish control of America, the latter of which was leading their country toward all of these things during the 1930s. For this, they were attacked and brought down.
We’d like to think that the story ends there, but we know it doesn’t. With the state’s inexcusable malfeasance on display during the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, during the Summer of Floyd in 2020, and again during the January 6, 2021 protest in Washington, DC, we know that the United States government is still perfectly willing to collaborate with thugs in order to quash any form of white identity wherever it appears. But other forms of identity are celebrated, especially the anti-white kind.
The press today blithely ignores this crass double standard as it digs through history for instances of Nazi-punching — while conveniently failing to report that the people who did the punching were much, much worse than their victims.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Related
-
The Captivity Narrative of Fanny Kelly
-
Plastic Patriotism: Propaganda and the Establishment’s Crusade Against Germany and German-Americans During the First World War
-
Race and IQ Differences: An Interview with Arthur Jensen, Part 2
-
The Unnecessary War
-
Marx vs. Rousseau
-
The Worst Week Yet: September 10-16, 2023
-
A Deep Ecological Perspective on the Vulnerability of Eurodescendants
-
Field of Dreams: A Right-Wing Film?
7 comments
I think that punch was a very pivotal moment because it certainly knocked Spencer off his axis and transformed him into a neoliberal shill.
They used the same tactics in the Eastern block after the soviet troops had occupied those countries, but before communists came to power as a result “free elections”. They would beat up people attending rallies for any other party and also had significant influence during the actual voting.
This reminds me of how our modern political elites use antifa against even the most milquetoast conservative rally. As infuriating as it is, it could never happen without the implicit consent of the ruling class. This supports the hypothesis that street action has limited success, if there is not a critical mass of political power already in place.
Exactly. The very concept of the “grassroots rebellion” is a complete fabrication, at least as far as the US is concerned. The “civil rights” movement of the 50s and 60s are a great example (although hardly the only one) of an “uprising” that was completely sanctioned and funded by the ruling class and has been propagandized as coming from the bottom up ever since then. Any genuine grassroots street activism that actually could end up threatening the establishment is quickly and efficiently suppressed. See Charlottesville and almost anything ever attempted by the WN 1.0 crowd.
Agree with both. Thanks.
What’s interesting is how antifa was nowhere to be seen on Jan. 6th. That of course was supposed to be the big event with all those Trump supporters. Presumably, it would have been open season what with it being DC and a DC jury pool. Jan. 6th could have been a mass culling of Trump supporters by the above reproach antifa as a sacrifice to the gods to usher in Biden’s reign. But that didn’t happen. They were miraculously allowed to “do their thing.”
If we can find out where Osama bin Laden is then there is no reason how Jan. 6th could not have been prevented. All it would have taken was one patsy Trumper getting his skull cracked in by a cop in riot gear and they all would have retreated. Instead they were let in and there’s unindicted co-conspirators listed in the court filings.
“The idea that Judge Perlman would conspire with Jewish mobsters to harass the Bund and protect them from persecution is a classic anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.” Rimshot!
History repeats itself. I recently read an article by the wife of the Jewish Mayor of Charlottesville about the rally who of course played the anti-Semitic conspiracy card (https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-lies-that-stoked-charlottesville-violence-and-threatened-my-husband-endure/). All the fact check sites says there was no stand down order but the facts on the ground say otherwise. Lots of fighting and the cops did nothing. I read from one source that said the exact opposite, that no arrests could be made without approval of the mayor. Even more brazen was her claim of “disinformation” regarding her husband’s Jewish identity, which is a matter of public record.
What’s on the nose is how Jews get all defensive about the idea that Jews have power. It’s beyond hyperbole at this point when the wife of a Jewish former mayor has to play the anti-Semitism card to defend him.
With all that out of the way, I do have the Hoppeian view of “forceful removal, if necessary.” The people of Charlottesville did not want these wignats in their liberal utopia complete with subversive Jew mayor. Frankly, I wouldn’t want these people in my neighborhood either. I think Gavin McInnis put it best, if the mayor initially refuses to issue a permit for your rally and is now doing so because of a court order, then he’s going to orchestrate a riot to make your side look bad. To his credit, IIRC, Signer did vote to keep the Lee statue but was in the minority. Probably all kabuki theater if you ask me. To his discredit, Signer and Charlottesville want the city to be welcoming except when it sues to keep “Nazis” out of the city. Sure, there is the first amendment and all that Jazz, but as we see with Perlman and decades later with Signer and Charlottesville, ingroup/identity politics trumps constitutional ideals. Even Perlman and Lansky were able to set aside their grievances to teach the goyim a lesson. They did not want the Bund operating in their community and the judge used his position in a subversive way to discourage them being in their community. Jews, being masters of artifice and subversion, are often very successful at this and when the ruse is finally found out the anti-Semitism card is there for the rescue. Hence my deadpan first sentence.
Gregory Hood put it best in a podcast, “how do you subvert subversion?” I’ve posted this before, but I think one such way is to do the same legal harassment that’s being done to Trump on the federal level to federal officials on the state level. DeSantis could easily have a county sheriff pull over Bruce Reinhardt, break his taillight, tell him Broward County and the State of Florida does not take kindly to his subversion of federal office. Maybe edit the audio/video footage and make it seem like Reinhardt says, “what kind of filthy goy do you think you are to pull over a federal magistrate!” as insurance for the inevitable anti-Semitism play. The ace of course would be to say that the idea the sheriff broke the judge’s taillight is a baseless conspiracy theory and that no one, not even a federal judge, is above the law.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment