2,546 words
Recent news reports about the ongoing, systematic physical brutalization, prostitution, rape, and sexual exploitation of at least 1,400 white, underage English girls in the city of Rotherham in northern England over many years by South Asian immigrants from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and elsewhere, has prompted the “explanation” that police, politicians, social service workers, and other state employees let it happen because they were “afraid” of being called racists if they tried to stop it. It is true that everyone in totalitarian states knows the Party Line and adheres to it. But that does not mean that they are secret dissenters from it.
In Rotherham the System performed according to specification, consistent with the beliefs and values of both rulers and functionaries. They are de facto revolutionaries whose job is to transform society and commit genocide. They are not “afraid.” They are not moral, good, or trying to do what is right. Their mission is to transform society and exterminate “racism.”
Rotherham, a city of about 258,000 people, is part of the Sheffield metropolitan area of about 641,000. The non-white (and anti-white) population of Sheffield imported by Labour and Tories for the purpose of permanently replacing—biologically and culturally wiping out—English whites has exploded in the 25 years since 1990. Newcomers include Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Somalis, Ethiopians, Black Caribbeans, Black Africans from Zimbabwe, Kenya, Nigeria, the Congo, Burundi and Liberia, Chinese from China, Malaysia and Singapore, Iranians, Kurds, Yemeni, and others.
The vast majority of victims are white girls, with most perpetrators being men of Pakistani descent. A “moderate” anti-white writer observed, “Although taxi drivers of Pakistani descent were central to the grooming and abuse of girls in care, the only taxi driver to have been banned from transporting the girls on suspicion of being a paedophile was white.”
Surprise, surprise.
The independent investigation into the crimes on behalf of the Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, which was conducted by Alexis Jay, Scotland’s former chief social work adviser, says that 1,400 (the report calls this “a conservative estimate”) children were sexually exploited in Rotherham by immigrant men between 1997 and 2013—a period of 16 years extending from the beginning of Tony Blair’s (Labour) premiership to last year (the government of Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, who is one-eighth Jewish).
According to the executive summary of the Jay report:
It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated. There were examples of children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators.
This abuse is not confined to the past but continues to this day. (Alexis Jay, Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham, 1997-2013, August, 21, 2014, 159 pp.)
The authorities and press euphemistically refer to these crimes as “grooming.” Newspeak is an important tool in advancing the Left-wing agenda.
One girl told the British press she was sexually exploited daily between the ages of 12 and 15 by hundreds of men in total; sometimes she was gang-raped by 5 men at one time. As a 12-year-old white, it is obvious from her story that she had no racial consciousness. That has been systematically and thoroughly eradicated from the young in all of our cultures—a major reason why the present demographic catastrophe is far worse than usually depicted.
Although the girl reported the rapes to police when she was 13 and 14, the authorities did nothing. According to the Jay report, police treated white victims “with contempt.” From a racial perspective, police everywhere, including white ones, are oppressors and destroyers of our race. This girl’s victimizers still live free in Rotherham.
In a number of cases children and young girls had pregnancies, miscarriages, and terminations. Quite a number of births also occurred. This is the classic case invariably invoked to justify abortion: “victims of rape and incest.” But now the Left has taken the opposite tack, saying that many white girls wanted to have and keep their mixed race offspring. The Jay report says some girls suffered the “further trauma” of having their babies removed by social services and contact with the children stopped.
Here we have the spectacle of society condoning, indeed slyly encouraging, the mass rape, sexual exploitation, prostitution, and promiscuous impregnation of white children by foreigners resulting in the birth of mixed-race children—and the ruling class and Left subsequently posturing about the “right” of the girls to keep and raise their hybrid offspring!
From the beginning, the “collective failures” of politicians and police “were blatant” according to Jay. “Stark evidence” in three reports from 2002, 2003, and 2006 known to the local Police and Council was suppressed.
It is true that Alexis Jay’s official report notes that “several staff” refused to identify the race of the perpetrators for fear of being thought “racist,” and the press picked up on this. Ordinarily omitted is the finding that some staffers received clear direction from managers not to identify the race of criminals.
Jay added that “Several councillors interviewed believed that by opening up these issues they could be ‘giving oxygen’ to racist perspectives that might in turn attract extremist political groups and threaten community cohesion. To some extent this concern was valid, with the apparent targeting of the town by groups such as the English Defence League.” (Jay report, p. 93)
This is not “fear,” but cover-up.
Do not jump to the unwarranted conclusion that those supposedly “fearful” of the racist label, or following explicit orders to remain silent, opposed what was happening or sympathized with whites, even if they were white themselves. There is no reason to believe this, and the pervasiveness of official “anti-racism” ideology strongly suggests otherwise.
I strongly suspect that the overwhelming majority of people in media and government do not give a damn about the white victims. In fact, what we see every step of the way is media and government complicity.
The Conservative Party-linked Spectator (UK) magazine informs us: “Rotherham Council’s children’s services last made headlines when it removed three eastern European [i.e., presumably white] children from their Ukip-supporting foster parents. [Ukip is the moderate, non-racialist UK Independence Party, viewed as unacceptably “right-wing” by anti-democratic elites in Britain and abroad.] One of its functionaries [a local government official] explained it was concerned about Ukip’s opposition to the ‘active promotion of multiculturalism’.”
The Spectator writes, “We don’t hold out much hope that anyone in a position of authority will be going to jail, nor even that anyone will lose their pension.” (Emphasis added.)
Indeed, Rotherham Council Chief Executive Martin Kimber, who is white, says that no council officers will even face disciplinary action. What does this suggest about the racial priorities and values of the British state and ruling class? That its apparatchiks are “horrified” by what happened? Hardly! The Politically Correct crimes are entirely consistent with state policy and interests. Whites are hated, and that hatred is institutionalized.
The Spectator said of Rotherham Council leader Roger Stone (also white), who resigned over the affair: “Roger Stone OBE, leader of the Labour-run council for the past 11 years, has ‘stepped down’, saying that he would be taking responsibility. There was no mention of the 71-year-old Mr Stone ceding his pension, and neither did he show much in the way of contrition.”
The Labour MP for Rotherham during the entire period the crimes were being committed was a corrupt (he was convicted and jailed) parliamentarian named Denis MacShane. MacShane is tightly allied with Jews, and strongly promoted Jewish measures to deprive whites of legal rights in Britain and Europe. He is also a Zionist (promotes Israel’s crimes against humanity). Reportedly the son of an Irish mother and a Polish father, his birth name was Denis Matyjaszek. MacShane was his mother’s maiden name.
MacShane has candidly stated that one reason he did nothing is that he was “a true Guardian reader and liberal Leftie.” The Guardian is an Establishment Left-wing newspaper for which MacShane was a columnist. He cared more about promoting Jewish power in Britain and overseas than he did about stopping, or even interfering with, the most evil crimes against whites.
MacShane’s replacement after he went to jail, current Rotherham MP Sarah Champion (Labour; ethnicity unknown), had this to say: “Some babies born to the victims as a direct result of such horrific abuse were taken away, and never seen by their mothers again . . . In my eyes, this is one of the most upsetting parts of the report.” (Emphasis added.)
Does anyone seriously think the British System—politicians, cops, prosecutors, judges, academics, journalists, or social workers—cares about what happened to the white children? How much of the supposed “horror” is feigned? There is no genuine sense of outrage. Indeed, how many people privately think, and even say to one another, “Good. Whites deserve it.” The entire System let these things happen, and even perpetuated and covered up the crimes.
The System is the way it is because it mirrors the racist values of the people who run it. Their hatred for whites is expressed daily in a multitude of despicable ways. Rotherham is entirely consistent with the thoughts, words, and deeds of governments and ruling classes everywhere. The acquiescence of officialdom was necessary for the crimes to occur year after year regardless of evidence and the power of a totalitarian state to easily stop them if it desired to.
Reproductive Effects
Rotherham furnishes evidence and insight into the nature of the sexual and reproductive boundary, the “frontier” along which white racial reproduction either does or does not occur. In the present environment it requires only one racial cross to biologically destroy the next generation of white children in any given line of descent. Unmixed white girls capable of producing Aryan children constitute a disintegrating demographic.
The Rotherham syndrome involves the systematic recruitment and sexual exploitation of young white girls and women by non-white men. In Rotherham many of the girls were actually children as young as 11.
This is the population which, in a racially healthy society, would soon constitute the next generation of wives and mothers. The likelihood of the very large number of white girls being interracially exploited at present (including industrial-scale pornography, prostitution, and widespread casual early sex) reproducing white children in a stable family environment is next to nil. Indeed many, eventually most, offspring will be interracial.
Whites of reproductive age appear to have a skewed or reversed racial consciousness at best. When it comes to sexual intercourse and childbearing, white females either do not “see” race, or have been socially programmed to actually favor non-whites. Non-whites are culturally glorified; white males are ridiculed, belittled, and denigrated. The former are also sexually aggressive and confident in comparison with beaten down, feminized, softened, intimidated white men and boys.
Also crucial is political correctness. This can be seen in the case of a white, Left-wing Labour MP named Ann Cryer, who tried to draw attention to the problem of sexual exploitation of underage girls as early as 2002. Whether she pushed as hard as is now claimed is questionable, but at any rate she was completely ineffective. She now says, “To tell you the truth I don’t give a damn. I’m nearly 75 now, I’m out of it all.” What still rankles, however, is that she was accused by government officials and parliamentarians of being “racist.”
The facts are essentially the same as in Rotherham, though Cryer’s constituency was Keighley in West Yorkshire County, bordering Greater Manchester. The crimes in question involved a different group of foreigners, the Rochdale sex trafficking gang in Manchester.
In 2002 Cryer was approached by seven white mothers desiring help rescuing their daughters from the clutches of the abusers. Extremely important to Cryer was the fact that, in her words, these were “enlightened [sic] mothers, members of the Labour party, women who I would never in a million years have described as racist.” (Emphasis added.) One suspects that if a white constituent had said something negative about the racial aspect of the crimes, they would have been rewarded with contempt, intense hostility, indifference to the plight of their children, and possible criminal charges.
In Manchester (again, not Rotherham) age was the only factor considered by MP Cryer and the seven “enlightened” mothers who approached her. According to Cryer:
They said the girls were being used for sex by them [young Pakistani men] and handed around—not as prostitutes, but were being handed around the families of these lads. This was underage sex. These girls were well below 16. The mothers said, “We understand it’s a criminal offence even if it’s consensual”, which I said was quite right. [This implies that at least some of the white girls “consented.”] And they said to me, “Why is it that West Yorkshire police won’t do anything about it, social services won’t do anything about it, when we have given them the names and addresses of the men abusing our daughters?” (“Rotherham report ‘reduced me to tears’, says MP who exposed abuse decade ago,” The Guardian [UK], August 30, 2014) (Emphases added.)
The sole concern of media and government in these cases, to the extent there is one, is the age of the exploited girls (the age of consent in England is 16). If white females are racially and sexually exploited in an identical manner once they turn 16, and “consent” to the treatment (“consent” in race cases such as these would be loosely interpreted by authorities), there will be no publicity or legal action. Since many women age 16 to 30 (the prime reproductive years) are sexually attractive, exploitation must occur beyond the age of 16 as well, just as it does in pornography and prostitution. This is of vital importance from the standpoint of group reproduction, since these young women should be having white families.
Thus, things are worse than the Rotherham horror indicates. Furthermore, investigations over the last four years have revealed parallel exploitation of underage girls by non-whites in areas including Rochdale (alluded to in the Cryer case), Derby, and Oxford.
There was also a Telford sex gang: “A group of seven men who preyed extensively on pre-teen and under-age teenage girls in Telford, England . . . There were accounts concerning men who would ejaculate and then urinate in children’s mouths, violating them in every orifice, as well as gang-rape by queues of men while girls were held hostage for hours, sometimes days.”
Again, these cases are distinct from Rotherham.
I would be surprised if pornography rather than traditional South Asian culture, much less Islam, wasn’t the primary inspiration for such acts. They are precisely the things Establishment pornography routinely depicts. The Jay report makes no mention of this, but I doubt police even look.
If the cases instead involved peaceful, noncriminal white writers, activists, or Holocaust revisionists, police, prosecutors, and judges would certainly examine and publicize the defendants’ computer files, reading matter, and writings—as well as enormously increase the length of criminal sentences meted out for practicing free speech by utilizing the “hate crime” “enhancement” provisions drafted by Jewish organizations.
But in Politically Correct crimes such as those in Rotherham, in which the Establishment itself is a participant, pornography and race hate would be ignored.
26 Comments
Things like this, and worse, are going to happen everyday unless we do something about it.
A very good article.
But only a dying people and nation could permit and tolerate this. Can you imagine the generation that fell at the Somme, putting up with this? Never! But decades of bad breeding and welfare state, has created an underclass people only to ready to lie down and die.
Here in the U.S., with the “white priviledge” groups stirring up hate, the leftist anti-white blog sites, like the massive Huffington Post, the constant anti-white brainwashing of the U.S. leftist media, (all major media in the U.S. is leftist, all big name reporters are democrats) and last but in no way least, Hollywood, that leftist factory of anti-white images and words——will assure that what is happening in England with these young white girls, will soon happen here unless sanity prevails.
If this is the attitude of White English people in authority positions to their brethren’s own daughters, then the English deserve to perish.
Not an ounce of tribalism of loyalty to be seen in these people, even a crazed vigilante a la Breivik has boundless degrees more virtue and honor than these weak sycophants who look the other way as their children are mass-raped by the most vile of people.
“. . . then the English deserve to perish.”
This sort of reasoning is very common among pro-white whites, but you should think it over carefully before embracing it. I personally believe it is fallacious, and have explained why: “’The White Race Does Not Deserve to Survive’ (White Version)” https://counter-currents.com/2014/01/the-white-race-does-not-deserve-to-survive-white-version/
It is wiser to hate the oppressors rather than the oppressed.
I am going to have to take a break from the internet. Articles like this make me physically ill and the fact that I live in the United States and I am powerless to do anything about it makes it even worse. The situation for whites truly horrible and the worst thing about it is that most white people I know do not give a shit about what is happening to the white race. They would rather watch sports and Honey boo boo.
The anti-White establishment in the UK is mainly white itself. That is the case in most other white countries too. Name me one race on earth that is capable of such behavior. We WN shouldn’t care anymore about “saving the whole White race”, only worthy Whites should be saved, those who are indifferent or hostile should perish.
Gold in the Furnace.
“only worthy Whites should be saved, those who are indifferent or hostile should perish.”
Sure. But we still need to march through the institutions before we truly can reckon who is worthy, and who can not be reasoned with. If we settled the score now, we would number so few that we would be squashed in a second. But indeed a big portion of the english population have prostituted themselves to the cultural hegemons. They are literally traitors to their people. Luckily, lampposts are numerous all over England too..
I don’t think the behavior of white elites is different from other races. Whites are an occupied people, with every majority white country in the world under Jewish rule. As with any occupied people, there are opportunists and traitors willing to do the bidding of the occupier for personal gain. A notable example is the Egyptian military leadership, which is aligned with Israel and America against their own people. Iraqi’s and Afghan’s collaborating with America are another example, as are Palestinians who spy for Israel. What is different for Whites is that the Jews are not content to just dominate Whites, but want to eliminate them.
We are occupied by those that deal out favors like a decent job and a decent income, the rest of the working class has been shoved off a cliff. The leverage is the money, without the Jew invented fiat currency and their control of it, these people would still be shop keepers. You have to get at the root of the problem then you can deal with the betrayers.
Your, “betters” sold you out 70 years ago, now it is just a mop up situation.
The hidden factor here is that most middle class white brits cannot empathise or sympathise with working class white brits. Class stratification is still a real thing in Britain. The kind of people who reside in the south of Britain and voted for Cameron think in terms of ‘us’ and ‘them’. What is happening to the working class is no concern of theirs.
It is not only the fear of being called racist which made those social workers and police officers to look the other way. The middle class of Britain considers itself a different nation from the British working class.
Exactly. The Eloi hate the Morlocks. And it’s so deep seated that is has become an unconscious reflex – one that can often be seen in British White Nationalist from the middle class. They also hate the vast majority of White Americans for the same reason.
I don’t know if there is a white working class per se anymore. Steady working class occupations tend to yield middle class incomes and lifestyles. But there seems to be a larger white lumpenproletariat of lowly-educated, unskilled workers, vagrants, alcoholics, small-time drug users, and petty criminals than ever before. Such people are only sporadically working class. Many are on welfare.
The middle class itself has lost much of its cohesion. Marriages and families are not solid, and except for government employees like those in Rotherham, they do not have much in the way of economic or job stability.
Notably, the middle class is prey to the ills of Jewish, multiracialist societies. My guess is that large numbers of the girls exploited in Rotherham and throughout England, and in pornography and prostitution, are from middle class backgrounds. One of the girls I read about said this explicitly. She was not from a broken home or a bad background—even though many middle class homes are broken now. My impression of the “enlightened” Labour Party mothers who sought help from Ann Cryer is that they were middle class as well.
Exactly what I was thinking. The British white working class has been so derided and put down that outrages such as this are – amazingly – not regarded as horrific. That the so called Left is massively implicated shows just how degraded and degenerate it is
This is just one of the many benefits of living in a christian, democratic society. Is it not amazing how much two thousand years of christianity has enriched us. Where are the christian clerics marching at the front of angry crowds of white people to remedy this?
The humiliation of colonisation.
“I was only following orders under penalty of death” has been replaced with “I was scared of being called something, like racist, and maybe getting written up, and maybe losing my job, or something I imagined, to excuse my need to do something; but I’m really a good person. Really.”
The British race has always had a leadership and bowed down to the symbols of authority . The leadership in general has been pretty good to the people whether it was the Arthur of legend or Caratacus before him. Noblesse Oblige had its roots in fact. The old aristocracy which was an organic part of the people was basically swept away in the Industrial Revolution and perhaps in the the Reformation before that. Today’s “aristocrats” have no connection to the race and love only money. The people still respect the symbols and can’t really believe they have been betrayed. Most of them get up in the morning and do their bit, whether it be driving the bus or maintaining the plumbing. They expect their social betters to do their bit too. The rot started in the church and I guess the cleansing will start their too? Wherever it begins it will, for that is just the way it is.
Here is a warning from March 23, 1942, from Rome radio, Ezra Pound Speaking……Titled……. BUT HOW ? SECOND ITEM.
It was not the present speaker, but an Englishman, believe an absolutely loyal Englishman, a sort of Royalist, not Mr. Eliot, but at any rate a King’s man, and so far as I recall a man who had no Fascist or Nazi sympathies, who on May 11th, 1939 uttered the statement I am about to repeat to you. Get the date, May eleventh,1939.
“There is NO mystery whatsoever about the disappearance of Mr. Litvinov from the political scene. The Soviet Foreign Minister vacated his office because he failed to deliver “the goods” demanded by the masters of Wall Street and Moscow. New methods to secure these “goods” will now assuredly be given trial. What are these “goods?” Nothing other than Great Britain, captive and in chains. Great Britain stripped of her empire, above all Great Britain, ruined financially by the collapse of the Pound Sterling and the system called “barter trading” which is based on that money.”
There, gentle Briton, you have it. Your own heroes have told you. And your own true men you have heard NOT. You have not heard your own true speakers. You have lain down and died in the gutter because you would not hear your OWN friends; your own loyal speakers.
Now as I keep on tellin’ you, my friends and /or acquaintances in England, were not of any one group. There were a few of ’em Fascists; but the most of ’em were IDIOTICALLY anti-fascist. They were most of ’em plum stupid about the Italian regime. I am not offerin’ you the ideas of a sect, I am as the strength is vouchsafed to me trying to remind you or tell you of a few home truths, that you COULD have learned not only from me, but from dozens of Englishmen.
Seems like it must have been more like HUNDREDS of Englishmen, trying to tell you for the past twenty-two years.
Now WHY did you not listen? Well, if that implies retrospect, bring it down to the true British question: W’ere do we g’ae frm ERE? I ask you.
I ask you still more HOW do you (go) from here. I can’t see that any other white race in Europe is going to be very anxious about Anglo Saxon survival. I belong to what is usually regarded as a branch of that race. Racially, English went to America along sometime after 1600. 1632-38, along up till 1700.
I think you lose by not thinking about this problem as RACIAL.
Yes, I know I went at it from the economic part of the picture. Brought up on American principles; no prejudice against any man for race,creed, or color.
Waaal, the chemist is not suppose to have any prejudice against any particular chemical; in the laboratory some stink and some do not. Some explode and some do not-chemist’s business-chemist in American sense, not the man in the drug store; say the chemical experimenter or chemical engineer is supposed to look at different chemical elements with a fair eye and mind.
So I don’t reckon to go along my road as with prejudice, I have tried to see the thing straight.
Birth control, bad national health, neoMalthusian preaching’ , scarcity economics, all working’ Britain’s downfall. Question is: Ain’t you fallen down about FAR ENOUGH?
Can’t you stop somewhere at least near the TOP of the dung heap, without having the whole midden flop over on top of ye?
And HOW are you going to do it? That is what I ask: How are you going to do it?
You certainly are NOT going to do it by abolition of all ARYAN ownership, and the mortaging of all England to a half hundred Kikes in New York. That is not going to give you a new British order.
CAN you understand, can any of you understand, that a few of you must club together, and at least try to find out what you BELIEVE?
You do NOT believe in the abolition of ownership? You do NOT believe that you should be ruled from abroad by Kuhn, Loeb, and Warburg, of the dregs of the ex-ghettoes of Europe, now planted on the neck of the American people.
I can’t write any more at the moment but HE said it, Ezra Pound spoke to the UK and the USA from 1941 until 1943 when Italy went chicken and surrendered, not the Fascists but let me say the Democrats. And he was tried for treason in the USA. And Pound could see the future because he knew the past and understood the kikes.
The blood of just men will boil at hearing the news that our girls were and are being raped.
But the rapes will go on, And on, And on. Because this is a orcastrated war against our people.
The blood is dripping off their hands.
Bit it should be dripping from their throats…
A theory I have seen kicked around various Dark Enlightenment websites is that there is some weird psycho-sexual thing going on in the Western world. I have no idea if this has any connection to the Rotherham situation. But, how much of this case is a foreign race staking out its genetic claims on the island by diluting the bloodlines of the indigenous people? And testing the willingness of the indigenous to resist them?
Look at the reports of immigrant-on-white rape epidemics in Scandinavian countries. And these were once the countries which produced Vikings, Rus and Gustavus Adolphus. Today? There was a video posted online of a Norwegian policewoman rationalizing away the assaults as a symptom of people coming from “traumatized” countries.
Same phenomenon. Just as we massive amounts of black-on-white rape from Boer farms to America’s cities. And a general taboo in force against naming blacks as the perpetrators.
Significantly, we rarely see the system rise to the defense of its female citizens. If anything, the system works to criminalize indigenous resistance (like the English Defense League). This is given ideological justification by claiming that bringing the crimes to light would be “racism.” Is the ideology a symptom of something deeper? i.e., the rationalization of a failure of the will.
Feminism is part of the problem, of course. By destroying the traditional “role” of men, it removes the warrior caste and replaces it with a general wussiness. Who is going to win in a fight, a sensitive new age male getting in touch with his inner woman, or a warrior band of men?
Also interesting is that feminists are largely silent about these attacks. Feminists know their place in the multicult feeding chain. They are literally handing over their daughters for sexual exploitation rather than think about racial purity thoughts. “Racism” is a far greater thoughtcrime than is “sexism.”
There might be some clues in here on how the pernicious elements of feminism can be smashed.
It just may come back to the feeding chain. Homo sapiens looking up towards those with the greater predatory instinct. Females want to reproduce with the conquering warriors, not the conquered. The Asian and African immigrant rioting in ancient European cities is the new wave of barbarian invasions, again duly rationalized away as part of the struggle against “racism.” Who knows, maybe the Rotherham establishment secretly envies the berserkers?
Anyway, all this needs to be explore more.
I will say that white nationalists need to push the warrior meme. If the system won’t protect its citizens, then it’s time for warlord bands to do so.
I liked your comment, in fact here is some more insight on the point you made:
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1300
“I will say that white nationalists need to push the warrior meme. If the system won’t protect its citizens, then it’s time for warlord bands to do so.”
The only problem with this is that the average White man has his head so far up his own butt that the second you try to do any meaningful networking with them then they just want to go off and do their own thing, never to be held accountable to anything, it’s that whole “I’m ok you’re ok”, idiot baby-boomer mentality. Like grazing cattle about to be packed onto the truck, and just as dim.
You might want to try the free ebook at Manhood Academy (manhood101.com), they cover the dynamics of relationships and authority very well.
Please provide a direct link or tell us what it’s called.
Thank you
Where is the female outrage? Do women not care about women any more? Seriously, I never thought I would miss the Musings of the fat, obnoxious, Jewess Andrea Dwarkin, but I do miss her now more then ever!! Seriously, where is the female outrage? Really. A bunch of angry bitches shouting and marching and being down right hysterical is FUCKING SCARY, YO. Come on girls wake up……
Yes weesa can!