1,979 words
Originally published by the Homeland Institute: https://homelandinstitute.org/polls/ice-and-mass-deportations/
- Despite thinking that ICE is too aggressive and that the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti were unjustified, white voters still overwhelmingly support mass deportations.
- Despite nominal opposition to policies which may be necessary to restoring order such as invoking the Insurrection Act and suspending habeas corpus, respondents still overwhelmingly agree that failing to restore order will encourage more violence in the long-term.
Minneapolis, Minnesota has become a flashpoint between immigration enforcement and anti-ICE protestors. In response, we polled 815 respondents who are politically and demographically representative of white, non-Hispanic American registered voters between January 28 and February 8, 2026. The margin of error was plus or minus 3%.
1. Attitudes towards ICE and Deportations
We began by asking whether they want the rate of deportations to increase or decrease:
| Q.1 Since January 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claims to have accomplished 675,000 deportations and 2 million self-deportations. Do you want the deportations of illegal immigrants to: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Greatly increase | 25.6% | 2.0% | 23.0% | 48.1% |
| Increase | 17.3% | 3.6% | 13.2% | 32.7% |
| Stay about the same | 15.3% | 11.3% | 20.6% | 14.1% |
| Decrease | 20.5% | 41.5% | 21.0% | 2.4% |
| Greatly decrease | 16.4% | 35.9% | 15.6% | 0.7% |
| I don’t know | 4.8% | 5.6% | 6.6% | 2.0% |
Overall, there was more support for increasing rather than decreasing deportations. This was at odds with how respondents tended to think that ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has been too aggressive in Minneapolis and overall:
| Q.2 In conducting deportations overall, do you think that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Too aggressive | 53.6% | 95.6% | 58.0% | 14.1% |
| About right | 31.9% | 2.4% | 26.8% | 61.3% |
| Not aggressive enough | 12.3% | 0.8% | 12.5% | 22.2% |
| I don’t know | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Q.3 In conducting deportations in Minneapolis, Minnesota, do you think that (ICE) has been: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Too aggressive | 57.9% | 97.2% | 61.1% | 21.2% |
| About right | 25.5% | 1.6% | 23.7% | 47.8% |
| Not aggressive enough | 12.8% | 0.4% | 10.5% | 25.6% |
| I don’t know | 3.8% | 0.8% | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Additionally, aside from Republicans, respondents tended to think that the killing of Renee Good and Alex Pretti were unjustified, despite ample evidence to the contrary:
| Q.12 Was the ICE killing of Renee Good: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Completely justified | 19.9% | 0.8% | 15.2% | 39.7% |
| Mostly justified | 19.8% | 0.8% | 20.6% | 35.4% |
| Unjustified | 10.3% | 7.7% | 16.3% | 7.1% |
| Completely unjustified | 41.1% | 88.7% | 37.7% | 4.0% |
| I don’t know | 9.0% | 2.0% | 10.1% | 13.8% |
| Q.13 Was the Border Patrol killing of Alex Pretti: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Completely justified | 13.5% | 0.4% | 10.1% | 27.9% |
| Mostly justified | 14.1% | 0.4% | 11.7% | 27.6% |
| Unjustified | 9.2% | 5.6% | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| Completely unjustified | 46.4% | 90.3% | 48.6% | 7.7% |
| I don’t know | 16.8% | 3.2% | 18.7% | 25.9% |
This paradox deepened in the next question, in which respondents, including Independents, tended to agree that it is illogical to claim to support mass deportations but then fold under pressure when people resist, thereby necessitating coercion:
| Q.4 Which of the following best describes your opinion of this statement: | ||||
| “It is illogical to claim to support mass deportations but then fold under pressure when people resist, thereby necessitating coercion.” | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly Agree | 17.7% | 8.9% | 17.5% | 25.6% |
| Agree | 28.0% | 15.3% | 24.5% | 41.8% |
| Neutral | 18.4% | 16.9% | 18.7% | 18.5% |
| Disagree | 12.8% | 16.5% | 16.7% | 6.1% |
| Strongly Disagree | 9.1% | 21.8% | 5.4% | 2.0% |
| I don’t know | 14.1% | 20.6% | 17.1% | 6.1% |
One possible explanation is that voters want things without wanting to pay for them in a classic case of wanting to have their cake and eat it too. Another more generous explanation is that the mainstream media has partially succeeded in defaming ICE but not in shaking voters’ support for mass deportations or law and order, which was their main objective behind defaming ICE.
2. Law and Order
There was high support for aggressively prosecuting fraud linked to immigration, with even more Democrats supporting rather than opposing such a course of action.
| Q.5 Which of the following best describes your opinion on aggressively prosecuting fraud linked to immigration? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 43.2% | 11.3% | 43.6% | 69.7% |
| Support | 28.3% | 31.9% | 28.8% | 25.6% |
| Neutral | 14.7% | 28.6% | 16.0% | 2.4% |
| Oppose | 6.0% | 13.3% | 5.1% | 0.7% |
| Strongly Oppose | 4.3% | 8.1% | 3.1% | 1.3% |
| I don’t know | 3.4% | 6.9% | 3.5% | 0.3% |
There was also high support for prosecuting CNN anchor Don Lemon for disrupting a church service, with opposition mainly being driven by Democrats. Note: Don Lemon was charged along with eight other defendants on or about January 30, near the start of this poll.
| Q.6 On January 18, in Saint Paul Minnesota, CNN anchor Don Lemon led a group of anti-ICE protestors in disrupting a church service and intimidating the church goers. They allegedly blocked parents and children from reaching each other and yelled at children. | ||||
| However, the Department of Justice formally withdrew its request for arrest warrants against Lemon and four others due to multiple judicial setbacks. | ||||
| Which of the following best describes your opinion on aggressively prosecuting Don Lemon and the other individuals who disrupted the church service for conspiracy to deprive rights, or similar? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 35.6% | 4.0% | 31.9% | 65.7% |
| Support | 21.0% | 13.3% | 25.7% | 23.2% |
| Neutral | 8.3% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 3.4% |
| Oppose | 11.3% | 23.4% | 10.5% | 2.0% |
| Strongly Oppose | 17.9% | 38.7% | 13.6% | 3.7% |
| I don’t know | 5.9% | 9.3% | 7.0% | 2.0% |
There was a similar pattern in support for prosecuting individuals in Signal chats which coordinated impeding ICE operations for insurrection and conspiracy to riot, along with prosecuting those who aid and abet “de-arresting” including those who provide funding and training.
| Q.7 Independent journalist Cam Higby infiltrated several Signal group chats which were organized for protesting and impeding ICE operations. Around January 24, release the message logs. It was revealed that the Lt. Governor of Minnesota, Peggy Flanagan, is one of the administrators of the Signal chats. | ||||
| Which of the following best describes your opinion on aggressively prosecuting Peggy Flanagan and other individuals in the Signal group chats for conspiracy to riot, insurrection, or otherwise? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 34.1% | 4.4% | 28.0% | 64.3% |
| Support | 17.1% | 7.7% | 20.2% | 22.9% |
| Neutral | 9.1% | 8.5% | 13.2% | 5.4% |
| Oppose | 11.7% | 22.2% | 12.5% | 2.4% |
| Strongly oppose | 21.8% | 46.8% | 20.2% | 1.7% |
| I don’t know | 6.3% | 10.5% | 5.8% | 3.4% |
| Q.8 The group “MN ICE Watch” had materials training their activists to “de-arrest” people detained by law enforcement officers through tactics like pressuring, swarming, and assaulting officers. The training materials also described each de-arrest as a “micro-intifadah.” Most jurisdictions generally treat assaulting law enforcement as a felony. | ||||
| Which of the following best describes your opinion on aggressively prosecuting those who aid and abet “de-arresting,” to include those who provide funding or training? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 40.5% | 3.6% | 38.1% | 73.1% |
| Support | 17.8% | 17.3% | 19.5% | 17.2% |
| Neutral | 11.5% | 17.7% | 13.6% | 4.4% |
| Oppose | 11.4% | 25.0% | 10.5% | 1.0% |
| Strongly oppose | 13.9% | 27.4% | 12.8% | 3.0% |
| I don’t know | 4.9% | 8.9% | 5.4% | 1.3% |
There was more opposition than support for invoking the Insurrection Act to restore order, and there was even lower support for suspending habeas corpus, including among Independents. However, this does not mean that these are not valid or even necessary measures.
| Q.9 The Insurrection Act authorizes the President to deploy military forces to suppress insurrections, rebellions, domestic violence, or to enforce federal/state laws when ordinary enforcement is impracticable. It has been invoked about thirty times. | ||||
| If it proves impossible or unreasonably difficult to prosecute and convict anti-ICE rioters and co-conspirators due to biased judges, juries, and prosecutors, which of the following best describes your opinion on invoking the Insurrection Act? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 23.4% | 0.4% | 19.8% | 46.1% |
| Support | 18.2% | 3.6% | 17.1% | 32.0% |
| Neutral | 9.1% | 5.2% | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Oppose | 12.3% | 16.5% | 14.4% | 6.7% |
| Strongly oppose | 32.9% | 71.0% | 30.4% | 2.7% |
| I don’t know | 4.2% | 3.2% | 6.6% | 3.0% |
| Q.10 Habeas corpus allows a person detained by the government to challenge the lawfulness of their imprisonment or detention in court. | ||||
| If it proves impossible or unreasonably difficult to prosecute and convict anti-ICE rioters and co-conspirators due to biased judges, juries, and prosecutors, which of the following best describes your opinion on suspending habeas corpus? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 10.3% | 4.4% | 9.3% | 16.5% |
| Support | 12.6% | 5.6% | 12.8% | 17.8% |
| Neutral | 15.5% | 5.6% | 15.2% | 23.9% |
| Oppose | 15.3% | 11.3% | 15.2% | 19.2% |
| Strongly oppose | 40.2% | 69.0% | 41.6% | 14.5% |
| I don’t know | 6.0% | 4.0% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
However, respondents were more likely to see the legal system as biased against conservatives than against liberals, including Independents.
| Q.11 In America, is the legal system generally: | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Biased against conservatives | 26.9% | 1.2% | 23.7% | 51.5% |
| Mostly fair to conservatives and liberals | 41.8% | 42.3% | 47.1% | 38.0% |
| Biased against liberals | 19.0% | 44.0% | 13.2% | 2.4% |
| I don’t know | 12.3% | 12.5% | 16.0% | 8.1% |
Despite nominal opposition to policies which may be necessary to restoring order, respondents still overwhelmingly agreed that failing to restore order will encourage more violence in the long-term, with disagreement being primarily driven by Democrats:
| Q.14 Which of the following best describes your opinion of this statement: | ||||
| “Failing to restore order in Minneapolis and Minnesota will encourage more violence in the long-term.” | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly agree | 45.3% | 12.9% | 40.9% | 76.4% |
| Slightly agree | 18.4% | 16.9% | 19.8% | 18.5% |
| Neutral | 7.6% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 1.3% |
| Slightly disagree | 7.9% | 14.1% | 9.3% | 1.3% |
| Strongly disagree | 18.4% | 41.5% | 15.6% | 1.3% |
| I don’t know | 2.5% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 1.0% |
3. Exploring Alternatives
We next explored various alternatives to ICE raids in blue cities which voters might be more comfortable with.
Support for mass deportation sweeps of the agriculture and hotel industries was not particularly high outside of Republicans:
| Q.15 Which of the following best describes your opinion on conducting mass deportation sweeps without exemptions for the agriculture and hotel industries? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 20.7% | 3.2% | 19.5% | 36.7% |
| Support | 20.6% | 2.8% | 19.1% | 37.0% |
| Neutral | 8.7% | 2.8% | 10.9% | 11.8% |
| Oppose | 15.7% | 21.4% | 17.5% | 9.1% |
| Strongly Oppose | 30.3% | 66.5% | 28.0% | 1.7% |
| I don’t know | 3.9% | 3.2% | 5.1% | 3.7% |
However, there was widespread support for aggressively prosecuting business owners who employ illegal immigrants and for making use of E-Verify (which is free) mandatory:
| Q.16 Which of the following best describes your opinion on aggressively prosecuting business owners who knowingly or recklessly employ illegal immigrants? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 28.3% | 8.1% | 27.2% | 46.5% |
| Support | 27.9% | 16.5% | 27.2% | 38.4% |
| Neutral | 12.3% | 14.9% | 15.2% | 8.1% |
| Oppose | 13.5% | 23.0% | 13.2% | 5.1% |
| Strongly Oppose | 16.4% | 35.9% | 15.2% | 0.7% |
| I don’t know | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Q.17 E-Verify is a free web-based system provided by the government that allows employers to check the immigration status of their employees. It is mandatory for certain types of employers in 24 states. | ||||
| What is your opinion on a federal law making E-Verify mandatory for all employers nationwide with stiff criminal penalties for failing to use it? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 34.4% | 9.1% | 31.6% | 59.8% |
| Support | 27.4% | 22.0% | 31.6% | 31.3% |
| Neutral | 14.5% | 25.3% | 15.6% | 5.2% |
| Oppose | 9.4% | 18.7% | 9.6% | 2.4% |
| Strongly Oppose | 11.8% | 24.9% | 11.6% | 1.4% |
| I don’t know | 2.6% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 2.1% |
4. Immigration Levels
Overall, there was extremely high support for deporting illegal immigrants with criminal records, even among Democrats. This means that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s and others’ attempts to shield “the worst of the worst” (who are showcased on a searchable Department of Homeland Security website) are seriously against the grain of public opinion.
| Q.18 Which of the following best describes your opinion on deporting all or almost all illegal immigrants with criminal records? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 56.1% | 18.2% | 55.5% | 90.5% |
| Support | 24.0% | 41.7% | 26.6% | 8.2% |
| Neutral | 10.2% | 23.1% | 9.8% | 0.3% |
| Oppose | 5.8% | 12.0% | 5.5% | 0.7% |
| Strongly Oppose | 2.7% | 5.0% | 2.7% | 0.3% |
| I don’t know | 1.2% | 2.5% | 0.4% | 1.0% |
| Q.19 Which of the following best describes your opinion on deporting all or almost all illegal immigrants, regardless of whether they have criminal records? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 23.2% | 2.8% | 22.7% | 40.8% |
| Support | 20.9% | 2.4% | 21.2% | 37.4% |
| Neutral | 10.6% | 5.7% | 11.4% | 14.3% |
| Oppose | 17.1% | 26.8% | 21.6% | 5.4% |
| Strongly Oppose | 27.5% | 62.2% | 23.1% | 2.0% |
| I don’t know | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Q.20 Which of the following best describes your opinion on reducing the amount of legal immigration? | ||||
| Results by Party | ||||
| % All | Democrats | Independents | Republicans | |
| Strongly support | 12.9% | 2.8% | 12.1% | 22.2% |
| Support | 15.5% | 8.5% | 14.0% | 22.2% |
| Neutral | 22.8% | 15.7% | 21.8% | 29.3% |
| Oppose | 25.0% | 31.5% | 28.0% | 17.8% |
| Strongly Oppose | 22.3% | 40.3% | 22.2% | 7.1% |
| I don’t know | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.3% |
There was close to equal support for and opposition to deporting all illegal immigrants regardless of whether they have criminal records, including among Independents.
Aside from Republicans, there was low support for reducing the amount of legal immigration. However, that does not mean that those who want less legal immigration cannot form a cohesive voting bloc which can make demands.
5. Key Takeaways
- The mainstream media may have succeeded in defaming ICE as too aggressive and in framing the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti as unjustified. However, this has not translated into opposition to mass deportations or other forms of immigration enforcement.
- Respondents, including Independents, tend to at least claim to understand that it is illogical to support mass deportations but then fold under pressure when people resist, thereby necessitating coercion.
- Despite nominal opposition to policies which may be necessary to restoring order such as invoking the Insurrection Act and suspending habeas corpus, respondents still overwhelmingly agreed that failing to restore order will encourage more violence in the long-term, with disagreement being primarily driven by Democrats.
- There is high support for aggressively prosecuting fraud linked to immigration, even among Democrats.
- There is high support for prosecuting CNN anchor Don Lemon for disrupting a church service as part of an anti-ICE “protest,” individuals in Signal chats which coordinated to impede ICE operations, and those who aid and abet “de-arresting” including those who provide funding and training. Opposition to such prosecution is mainly being driven by Democrats.
- There is widespread support for aggressively prosecuting business owners who employ illegal immigrants and for making use of E-Verify (which is free) mandatory.
- There is very high support for deporting illegal immigrants with criminal records, even among Democrats.
- There is about equal support and opposition for deporting all illegal immigrants regardless of whether they have criminal records.
- There is low support for reducing the amount of legal immigration except among Republicans. However, that does not mean that those who want less legal immigration cannot form a cohesive voting bloc which can make demands.
9 comments
These results align with what I’ve observed anecdotally. When someone supports deportations but opposes ICE, I have to wonder what they expected deportations to look like. Every migrant just peacefully saying “Ah shucks, you caught me. Take me away, officer.”
Fine analysis. Did leftists really believe this was going to go down differently? They knew the president ran on this and won decisively. Aliens, like typical criminals, know they’re criminals and yet don’t surrender peacefully or turn themselves in. The main aspect I don’t believe the feds were prepared for was how well funded and organized this idiotic resistance scheme was. They need to expose the criminals among the aliens as aggressively as the left expose the young parent less children. Arresting more resisters and trying to get a legal buffer zone enforced would seem advantageous. It would be great if they could work without interference, but the judges can’t seem to get their law enforcement caps on these days. Maybe it will require suspension of habeas corpus to get this really moving. A federal level Prop 187 would certainly help.
Good information and analysis. This is exactly as it should have been predicted long ago, since before Trump came down the escalator.
Instead of putting pedal to the metal, however, the usual suspects have waffled and now they are backing off instead.
We need to think in dialectical terms. The throttle is either On or it is Off.
We should have expected the Left to react badly to ICE enforcement in Sanctuary Cities, and the response of the Administration ─ our response ─ should have been a crushing blow to the jugular of AntiFa WITHOUT MERCY.
But we can’t seem to do what is necessary. Instead of holding Trump’s feet to the fire to keep him focused on what he promised ─ what we elected him for ─ the best that we can do is watch our great White hope, Comrade Massie attend Congressional hearings playing Trump Derangement Syndrome RINO wannabe and delivering the bacon for his Bible-based constituency back home.
Instead of actually destroying AntiFa, we are left pontificating about billionaire prostitution rings in lieu of any actionable evidence. The host of distractions are legion.
This is how we LOSE and this why we have always LOST, and this is why we will CONTINUE to lose. I suppose we deserve it richly, too, since we can’t seem to do anything else but dither. To say that we have become “too Bourgeois to fight” is laughable at this point.
We need to take no prisoners and to hold that all illegal aliens and their dependents be deported to their ancestral homelands immediately. Those who resist or who call it unjust need to dealt with as Terrorists.
We need to ruthlessly enforce the Voter ID standard. If anybody says that any of this is Racist, then they are not long for the lampost. They are not one of us, but the enemy. They must be treated accordingly. Racist? Double down. Double down.
There are two camps here: The Left and the Right. Pick one, Whitey. There is no straddle.
🙂
At least, someone says that the Epstein circus is a diversion.
This “diversion” talk presupposes that we are all so ant-brained that we can’t pay attention to more than one thing at a time.
I think the last time a “Hey, look at the DOW hitting 50,000”-style diversion worked on me was when I was six years old.
Third try. Lost LONG posts each time. I should compose in a word processor instead of the comment software.
The gist of it was that in the United States, not the President but the corporate mass-media tries to set the political agenda. This has been true for as long as I can remember, with few exceptions like Newt Gingrich’s “Contract With America.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America
Longtime Speaker of the House Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill (D-MA), who was mentored by the elder Joe Kennedy himself, observed in his ghostwritten memoirs that the President-elect James Earl Carter had to be immediately disabused of the notion that the U.S. Congress could be dealt with like the Georgia State Legislature. Washington, DC is a completely different political animal entirely.
That is why the Epstein fuss is so valuable right now to the Never Trump faction of the GOP and to the Democraps. If there were any actionable evidence to the matter, then the Democrats would have used it already. The TDS faction would simply not have been able to resist.
All this really does is serve as red meat to salivate over for Pavlov’s dogs of the Evangelical, Libertarian, and Tax Patriot wing of the GOP, the core “anybody but Trump” undertow that is joining the Democrats and lauding the idea that ICE is pulling out of Minnesota with a scolding finger-wave.
For these people, all is right with the Republic as long as we have cheap immigrant labor, low capital gains taxes, and plenty of Bible.
And we are always just one verse away from normalizing cannibalistic pedophile human sacrifice, and a complete Satanic takeover.
This is why the Right always loses and always will LOSE.
What is needed instead is an existential digust reflex to the very idea of Third World immigration ─ let alone Somali welfare fraud. I mean, a “Day of the Rope” kind of disgust. Traitors be on notice.
What we get instead is Tampon Tim now declaring victory with the current ICE pullout in Minnesota, and the notion that immigration enforcement is somehow heavy-handed by definition, and that Voter ID is inherently racist. I wish.
The Nattering Nabobs are routinely referring to the slain Lesbian AntiFa activist Renee Good and the martyred pugilist Alex Pretti, who might as well be a ringer for the Happy Merchant meme, as a mother and an ICU nurse respectively ─ both needlessly victimized by zealous Fascists in the course of Trump’s wicked immigration enforcement.
The corporate mass-media did the same “deadly” framing with James Fields at Charlottesville, who was attacked in 2017 by an armed Communist mob ─ and the Negro felon George Floyd, who overdosed while resisting arrest during the 2020 “unrest” in Minneapolis.
In Trump’s first administration, he had very little practical political experience in how to deal with the corporate mass-media, who almost to a man were and are more than just the political opposition. They are the existential enemy, and they simply cannot be reasoned with.
The President seemed to think that allowing the opposition dogs into his Big Tent of peace to live in perfect harmony ─ lying about, sipping the free Bubble-Up and eating that Rainbow Stew ─ Trump somehow thought that these scumbags would refrain from urinating inside the cosy enclosure, LOL.
In his second term, Trump has been a little more savvy on how to deal with the Nattering Nabobs. This does not mean that he has not had other issues, as we know.
If the Donald could only focus, focus, focus on the ruthless elimination of illegal immigration, and something simple and effective like mandatory Voter ID, much progress would be made for White interests.
🙂
Great article! The people in the “evil party” need to wake up, and smell the coffee. There is no nice way of getting rid of these parasites. 🙃
In pretty much all the responses, there’s a deep ideological divide. I have to wonder what the heck is the matter with the great majority of Democrats and why they can’t put two and two together. Nobody has the right to move into another country without obtaining permission. If I (or anyone else, for that matter) sneak into China and decide to stay permanently, then when I get caught, they’ll put me on the next plane back home – and that’s if I’m lucky. Other than that, the more Third World hard luck cases colonize our country, the more we resemble the country they came from. Even when I used to be liberal (which fortunately I outgrew when I was 14) I knew they didn’t belong.
AntiWhite reprobates are just a crazier version of the Westboro Baptist Church. ‘Racist, fascist, Nazi, transphobe, hate speech!’ are just their ‘god hates fags, you’re going to hell’ looniness whose crank religion is antiWhite negrophilia (hating Whites who they’re totally dependent on and welcome infinity shitholians, but not in my backyard. Only in your home, not an open house in their home).
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.