250 words 
On this latest edition of Counter-Currents Radio, Greg Johnson was joined by Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey to discuss frankly and openly their thoughts on the upcoming presidential election in the United States. It is now available to download or listen to online.
1:40 – Who does Mr. Taylor plan to vote for?
2:30 – Should we write Jared Taylor’s name on the ballot?
3:50 – Why aren’t newspapers endorsing a candidate?
12:53 – Might Trump be better for whites this time?
17:00 – Enter Paul Kersey
22:08 – Trump didn’t actually do anything other than anger the left
24:50 – Back to the newspapers who didn’t endorse candidates
27:16 – Question on the Out of Africa theory
36:42 – Question on the Scottish referendum
38:27 – Jared’s comments on human evolution
40:47 – How many minorities can we have in a white ethno-state?
50:48 – How do you object to meritocratic immigration?
1:03:49 – Should we send our daughters to university?
1:11:48 – Is white society better than Asian society?
1:16:10 – White South Africans are Trumps biggest backers?
1:19:26 – Is Trump more likely to go to war with Iran?
1:24:54 – Will Trump undermine freedom of speech?
1:29:22 – On the Groyper War 2 against Trump
1:33:17 – Are we still “dissident”?
1:36:40 – On JD Vance and Musk
1:40:00 – What are the best moments of Trump’s campaign so far?
1:42:08 – What’s better for Republicans: pandering to whites or pandering to non-whites?
1:48:25 – Which pro-white writers have influenced you the most?
1:52:00 – Whats the worst case scenario if Trump loses?
1:55:50 – On Trump’s legal cases
1:56:50 – Do you wish you had been born sooner or later?
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
26 comments
I plan to cast a write-in vote for Pat Buchanan.
No immigration, no war, no degeneracy.
Why bother?
The same reason the Muslims are voting for Jill Stein.
“What’s in it for the Whites?” ought to be our way of looking at every election. If it isn’t we’ll be out-competed and shoved into the ash heap of history by groups that do look at everything in terms of what’s good for them.
This was a very good episode, and there seemed to be a lot of engagement. It may just be me, but I appreciate these podcasts with outside figures.
I bet a lot of these institutions that are mysteriously endorsing trump have to do with the Zionists wanting trump in. I bet that is the reason.
We don’t need immigrants to have good healthcare. American medicine was considered preeminent in the early twentieth century. For example, neurosurgery started in America with Harvey Cushing and the invention of the cauterizing knife by Bovie.
“The Zionists” back both parties so does this have any explanatory value at all?
It’s true, but they get different things from each party. A hot intervention with boots on the ground is more likely to come from a Republican(eg the bush wars), whereas the dems do this dance of trying to appease both factions. Most of the dems really don’t like the Zionists at heart, but have to obey them anyway, whereas the republicans love and obey. I mean, I think you’re being sort of reductive.
Added later: we could also just bomb Iran into rubble in conjunction with Israel, without putting boots on the ground.
The neocons are Democrats now.
I was reading about Bovie who invented the cauterizing knife. He died poor because he gave his patents away—he worked for the good of humanity. Similarly, in the early twentieth century, Grote Reber invented radioastronomy in his back yard, never with a view to any profit or distinction. It’s jaw dropping what great inventors were among the white race, something clearly just natural to them, yet no one ever talks about them! I feel so much of our patrimony has been obscured from us.
Was there any other race so ingenious and benevolent?
I usually get at least one good laugh per episode of Counter-Currents Radio. Hearing Greg say “Take that, you racist C.H.U.D.s” just made my day.
My importantest teachers on racial awareness were Jared Taylor, Greg Johnson and Kevin macdonald, although I would wedge Duke in there if there were four, for some 1.0 action. Wilmot Robinson, Putnam and Sam Francis were important, but I mainly learned of them through the later commenters, particularly from My Awakening.
Thank you
Great use of the word importantanest!
I would mention the same heroes of the white pill in my case as well.
Perhaps the wrong place to ask this, but is the RSS feed broken? I’ve tried to add it to my podcast app a few times from different platforms and the latest episode is from January 2022.
Great discussion. Got to listen to it all yesterday. It was nice to hear Mr. Taylor’s praise for The White Nationalist Manifesto.
Is it really so puzzling that the LA Times, Washington Post, and Teamsters declined to endorse Harris? I was surprised that you two are so mystified by it, their motivations seem very clear to me.
Firstly, I’d say the case of the Teamsters is a bit different from the other two. Although their leadership may have ties to the Democrat party, their membership overwhelmingly prefers Trump, and I believe there have even been polls done to support this. Even members who may be nominally Democrat have begun to recognize the rapidly growing gulf between their beliefs and those espoused by the party. The Democrats have constructed this constellation of causes that are revolting to the typical down to earth working man. And while Teamsters leadership may have been able to get away with endorsing Democrats in the past perhaps out of momentum, I think the divide has become so pronounced that it would become an absurdity to keep endorsing the Democrats, especially a complete farce like Harris.
The LA Times/Washington Post are different in that their workforce is made up of pesople who are actually ideologically committed to the current Democrat party, and it was the leadership who made a judgment call to prevent them from going down the path of total self-immolation. News media relies on a perception of prestige to be successful. The readership has to believe that the writers and editorial board are intelligent, well-read people who are worth listening to. An endorsement of Harris severely damages that perception.
As I grow older and more speculative (or suggestible!) I think something like 50% of Whites are not in substance White at all even though in appearance they might look it. (They Live). With some it’s almost as if they have a transcendent death wish: to die for a higher cause (but also take lots of others with them). These people are lost and will take you and the rest of society with them if they can.
I don’t think it can be blamed e.g. on Spiteful Mutant syndrome where defectives survive into adult life when in older times they would have died in early childhood. Similar lunacies existed e.g. in the English Puritan/Cromwellian times (and on both sides of the Pond). And you can’t blame that all on the rye bread ergot, lysergic acid and ergotamine.
So setting aside larger issues of substance and strategy, as an incremental step for regaining Whites who are not lost (but are under mind control) I wonder if the following so far as referencing blue light devices bears scrutiny by those who have the chops to critique it with a view to raising awareness.
Possibly implausible source, it goes all over the map, and Kruse [Krasening (sp.?) may be a blagger as well as dropping excessive street-cred f-bombs but he has insights and one of those is addressed around 40:15 (and passim) – delivery of blue light technology through screens as a DARPA mind control vehicle: controlling dopamine reward trac[k]s, dumbing you down and rendering you much more likely to “precondition”. (Also references e.g. the Stanford Marshmallow Experiment).
(Go to the youtube link and see also the Outline time codes. In the audio/podcast only version at least there is an advert around 16m and another in the first 30m iirc but not otherwise impregnated; it’s also on the podcast platforms e.g. podbean, Danny Jones Epi.263).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiBFtwbyv44
2024-09-30
You need only walk the streets for a block or two in any city in any country to see people immersed in the alternate world of their phones. They are not engaged, they are hypnotised. Until that trance state is broken, getting any message out is a lost cause.
(I have a vague recollection that the late Steve Jobs was reported as having said to never let his kids have ‘screens’…..).
That’s true, but this tendency in Europeans goes way back. There is a need in European men of a certain status to attach themselves to some moral principle counter to those around them and flaunt it in the face of one another, as a spiteful point of pride. Take for example the various religious creeds and wars during th reformation—people loved being burned at the stake to stubbornly hold to their variance with one another. Wokeism and white replacement fit neatly into this paradigm, in this post enlightenment world. More than just themselves, they get to sacrifice all of us with them.
Greg and Jared unfortunately speak from a position of ignorance where Scottish ‘nationalism’ is concerned. It’s an incurably anti-white movement which is opposed by all genuine British nationalists.
On the contrary, there are Scottish Nationalists who are very much pro-White. And what is a “British” nationalist, anyway? Is Britian a nation? Or an English empire holding sway over other nations?
The Homeland Party is a British nationalist party whose leader happens to be Scottish. Here’s a recent Tweet from them, to give a bit of real world context:
In an age where the Labour Party has abandoned the working class, where the Tories have elected a Nigerian as their leader after they’ve had an Indian at the helm, where the Greens are more interested in the LGBT than anything natural and where the Scottish Nationalists are essentially globalists, many many people will feel politically homeless. They will feel that no mainstream party puts them or the land around them first. They will feel that the priorities or these parties are simply wrong. We know exactly how they feel. This is why the Homeland Party exists and why it’s growing at such a rate. To quote one of our conference speakers, we are the last, best chance for our people.
https://x.com/Homeland_Party/status/1852702266173649252
And by the way, when you say things like ‘what is a “British” nationalist, anyway? Is Britian [sic] a nation?’ you sound like the enemy.
It’s a simple question: Is Britain a nation or an empire?
It’s not a simple question! If a time ever comes when sanity is restored and the forces of antiwhiteism are defeated, then we can try to answer it if it still seems relevant. But to make a cause of Scottish or Welsh secessionism when we’re faced with demographic replacement strikes me as rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic (particularly given the ultra-left/antiwhite nature of those movements). Our enemies would, no doubt, be happy for us to expend our energies that way.
If we only have 50 men like Jared Taylor, we’ll take everything back.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.