Note: The core of this article was published in 2017. The occasion was the cyberbullying of several female video commenters who eventually left the movement. The article was republished in the first edition of my book Toward a New Nationalism. I dropped it from the second edition, because the figures it referenced are no longer relevant. But the central arguments remain as relevant as ever. Thus I decided to remove any dated references and make it more perennial in tone.
Many people leave the White Nationalist movement because of endemic drama, including online bullying by obnoxious people. I favor an easy entry, easy exit policy. But you should have good reasons for leaving. Here are some reasons not to go.
Everyone in this movement inevitably finds himself wondering, “If the cause of White Nationalism is so good, why are the people so bad?” But we have to remind ourselves: “Despite the fact that the people are so bad, the White Nationalist cause still remains good.” (I am paraphrasing an argument from Harold Covington.) The point is to see that, ultimately, the core of the movement is an idea, not a set of people. The people are there just to serve the idea, and that includes us.
Whenever your enthusiasm for the cause wavers, remind yourself that you are doing this because, first and foremost, you think this is right. White Nationalism is about putting the common good of our race over individual interests whenever they conflict. That includes our own interests. A true idealist also acts out of duty rather than personal pleasure, whenever the two conflict. Yes, this cause is often joyful, and a successful movement has to offer personal rewards and pleasure. But in the last instance, we do what we do because it is right, not because it is fun. Which is how we stick to it when it isn’t fun.
None of us may live to see free white homelands. So our activism is, at its core, sacrificing ourselves for the common good, for the future of our people. There’s a saying that a society becomes great when people plant trees so their descendants can enjoy shade. White Nationalism is about creating a world in which our race has a future, even if we do not share in that future.
But we can share its greatness today. And that greatness shines most brightly when we endure the hard times, sustained by idealism alone. Of course the movement has to offer more than idealism and sacrifice. But they are the bedrock upon which it is built, and it will fail without them. Our race dies a little every time we choose self-indulgence over duty, the present over the future, private interests over the common good.
No, the idea cannot triumph without attracting good people. And every bad person who clings to this cause repulses a hundred better ones. So we have to understand why there are so many bad people and figure out ways of attracting better ones. But the White Nationalist idea is absolute. The people are fungible, and if good people are quitting while stupid, crazy, and evil ones are running amok, the movement is going to fail. When decent people listen to their feelings of disgust and start thinking of quitting, they are letting the bastards win.
You can’t do that. You’ve got to listen to your idealism instead, and you also need to turn up your disgust a notch. If someone is behaving in a manner so disgusting that you are thinking of abandoning all that is good and holy, perhaps you should feel a bit disgusted with yourself as well.
Beyond that, if someone is disgusting enough to drive you from the battle, aren’t they also disgusting enough for you to want to crush them? Because that’s the spirit we need.
Of course, once you go beyond the beatific vision of crushing your enemies and ask yourself exactly how it can be accomplished, it dawns on you that we can’t really get rid of these people. We can’t kill them. We can’t throw them in prison. We can’t get them off the Internet. We can’t track down every donor and supporter. We can’t shame and silence every shill. We can’t revoke some sort of membership in the movement. We can’t “purge” them.
But they can’t do that to us, either.
White Nationalism is a decentralized, pluralistic, largely virtual movement. There are plenty of cliques and groupuscules and scenes. But there is no absolute inside and outside. There is no king, pope, or dictator. No arbiter of who is in and who is out. We can’t even rid this movement of doxers, embezzlers, con artists, miscegenators, drunkards, druggies, chronic failures, and controlled opposition. But somehow, some of us have made a science of driving away decent people. That has to stop. The closest thing we can do to purging all the bad elements is simply to leave them alone. Let them have their little cliques and cults. Let them serve as an abscess into which all the poisons drain.
Recognize that all the power is in your hands.
Nobody can make you leave this movement. Only you can do that. So don’t.
If only you can make you leave the movement, your enemies depend entirely upon you to hand them a victory. Which makes bullying extremely stupid. Nobody can remain a leader for long if he fails repeatedly. That goes for online lynch mobs as well as political movements. The best way to avoid failure is to choose goals that you can actually accomplish. The more the outcome depends on your actions and the less it can be controlled by your opponents, the greater the chance of success.
In the case of bullying, however, success depends entirely on the victims. If the targets of bullying just hold firm, they win, and their enemies look incredibly weak and foolish. This sort of strategic stupidity is why the movement keeps lurching from one self-induced defeat to another.
Manage your expectations.
There will never be a movement without destructive infighting, and it is unreasonable to expect otherwise. Even if we could convert or drive out the worst elements in the movement, the establishment that opposes us would simply create replacements. In short, these people — whether they know it or not, whether they intend to or not — are doing the enemy’s work. Their goal is to create a smaller, weaker, poorer, more marginal, but “purer” movement — a movement with a madhouse atmosphere that repulses the normal and the superior — a movement that has zero chance of resonating with the masses, changing the course of history, and saving our race from extinction.
Well, that is the goal of our enemies as well. So if the troublemakers did not exist, the enemy would find it necessary to create them. Note that I am not accusing anyone of being an enemy agent. I am actually accusing them of being something far more contemptible: people who do the enemy’s work for them, for free. Their motives ultimately don’t matter. Controlled opposition or not, the results are exactly the same.
But if these people will always be with us, then they cannot constitute an argument for quitting, for then the movement will simply fail. Indeed, they only constitute an argument for working harder.
Remember who your real enemies are.
Imagine that it were possible to completely extirpate movement infamy. If you try it, you will discover that it will quickly consume all your time and energy and prevent you from being able to do any positive work.
But our positive work is what will change the world, and we cannot let ourselves be deflected from it.
Ultimately, the best way to defeat one’s opponents is simply to ignore them and focus on making constructive contributions to the movement. Always remember that we are in the business of slaying dragons, not swatting flies.
Count your blessings.
I love this cause, and even with all the bad aspects, I would not trade my life for anything. As I put it in one of my essays:
There have been times when I wished that I had never gotten involved with White Nationalism. I tend to focus on the negative and forget about the positive. Sometimes I brood over the fact that the craziest, crookedest, most loathsome people I have ever encountered have been White Nationalists — forgetting that the finest people I know are White Nationalists as well.
My complaining finally angered a good friend, a secret agent who does as much as he can for the cause. He told me that I lead an enviable life, that I work full time for the most important cause in the cosmos, that I can speak the truth as I see it for the rest of my days. Then he reminded me of the basic premise of Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Buffy has super-powers and is part of a secret initiatic society doing battle with the forces of evil. Night after night, she is literally saving the world. And yet . . . all she wants to be is an ordinary high school cheerleader.
Well, when you put it that way, I choose to fight evil and save the world.[1]
Don’t allow yourself to burn out.
Even though idealism and self-sacrifice must, in the last instance, be what sustains this movement through the trials, if life were nothing but trials we would burn out and become useless to the cause. So do everything you can to build personal rewards into your activism. Above all, do not let yourself become isolated. Cherish the good people and do everything you can to avoid the bad ones.
Up your emotional intensity.
I am haunted by W. B. Yeats’ lines in “The Second Coming”:
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Other things being equal, this differential alone will be enough to bring any movement to ruin.
Don’t lose track of what’s really important.
The substance of our movement is its goal: creating free homelands for all white peoples, which is how I define White Nationalism. You are “in” our movement if you fight for that goal. Everything that we fight about is a side issue.
Note
[1] Greg Johnson, “In My Grandiose Moments,” in Truth, Justice, & a Nice White Country.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
Related
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy Rozdział 2: Hegemonia
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy, Rozdział 1: Nowa Prawica przeciw Starej Prawicy
-
Will There Be an Optics War II?
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy: Wprowadzenie
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy: Przedmowa
-
Notes on Plato’s Alcibiades I Part 2
-
Notes on Plato’s Alcibiades I Part 1
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 582: When Did You First Notice the Problems of Multiculturalism?
9 comments
Captain Codreanu had something to say about this in the Nest Leader’s Manual. The translation here isn’t the best, but the basic idea should come across.
POINT 32. b) There is the Legion “I was upset and leave.”
If you argue with someone with a comrade, legionnaire must reconcile. In any case, can not leave the Legion on this ground, because it can not be mad at the Legion, that the fight for salvation of his country. And if they leave, his mistake is very high compared to all Legionnaires, Legion flag girl and girl of his people.
One can leave the Legion is no longer believed, but not when they get angry.
That is a truly caveman rendering of what must be perfectly cultured Romanian!
On which note, I was prompted to look and have just discovered a full online copy of Charpeleu’s (Prince Michel Sturza’s) La Bete sans Nom , which text I have previously only found as an extract. Thanks to the kind soul who put this in the archive.
“But somehow, some of us have made a science of driving away decent people. That has to stop. The closest thing we can do to purging all the bad elements is simply to leave them alone. Let them have their little cliques and cults. Let them serve as an abscess into which all the poisons drain.
Their goal is to create a smaller, weaker, poorer, more marginal, but “purer” movement — a movement with a madhouse atmosphere that repulses the normal and the superior — a movement that has zero chance of resonating with the masses, changing the course of history, and saving our race from extinction.”
Perhaps part of the reason the movement has tolerated the anti-social elements for so long is due to a “beggars can’t be choosers” mentality which in its turn is borne of a panicked eleventh hour apocalyptic doomsday obsession; “Its so late in the day that we can’t be fussy and must accept whatever help we can, no matter how apparently unsavoury”.
Here in the UK we’ve managed to buck this self-defeating trend with the formation of two well-organised groupings that have proven highly effective in reaching out to the type of ordinary, socially stable people this movement needs in order to succeed and grow: patrioticalternative.co.uk and homelandparty.org
There is no reason that the template provided by both PA and Homeland can’t be replicated anywhere else in the English-speaking world. They have taken their inspiration from contemporary highly successful continental European nationalist organisations that enjoy considerable support from younger, better-informed and well-presented white ethno-nationalists.
Also, has anybody noticed that apostates from this movement who eventually side with Antifa tend to come from the marginalised fringe elements often attracted to costume wearing and general anti-social behaviour?
I found this intriguing. But I’m not sure who or what the author is talking about, but of course he may be reluctant to say for litigious reasons. On that topic, who or which other websites or groups does counter currents endorse? Some sort of blog roll or list would be useful.
People who quit or whatever because of “mean comments” clearly lacked conviction in the first place. Several writers have left Unz review because of the harsh commenters, but I think it was because their ideas couldn’t withstand scrutiny rather.
There’s this quote from Machiavelli that I like, “if anyone would wish to speak evil of the writer, be warned that he too can speak evil, indeed, he excels at it!”
Greg is talking about those social undesirables – and you are aware of them and you know who we are referring to: 1930’s costume fanatics; let’s blame the Jews for everything nut jobs; whining inadequates “I hate black men ‘cos they’re taking all our women and I can’t get a girlfriend” (No, nothing at all to do with black men but because, dear fellow you have no social skills, don’t know how to dress properly or maintain basic personal hygiene and don’t know how to interact with ordinary people), whose presence within the movement puts off the decent, genuine and idealistic people among us who want to make a positive contribution. Also worth remembering – there’s a difference between firstly, switching sides due to apostasy; secondly, leaving the movement permanently because of genuine burnout; thirdly a temporary break be it short or long in order to recharge your batteries.
I have a sonnenrade tattoo on my cheek. This discourse hurts my feelings a little bit, frankly.
If the tattoo is on one of the cheeks of your buttocks, then I can’t see why you’re getting so worked up, as very few people are going to see it and draw conclusions as to its presence and meaning.
Excuse me whilst I change into my SS Leibstandarte parade uniform with stahlhelm – I have a Parent/Teachers Association meeting to attend!
This essay is undoubtedly one of the most inspiring I’ve ever read. Thank you for this excellent and very invigorating text, dear Dr. Johnson!
Thanks so much.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment