Counter-Currents
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 531
Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson & Pox Populi
Counter-Currents Radio
153 words / 1:35:41
The second half of the latest broadcast of Counter-Currents Radio was an Ask Me Anything with Greg Johnson and Pox Populi (Telegram, YouTube), and it is now available for download and online listening.
Topics discussed include:
00:00:30 Question about James Burnham and liberalism’s parallels to Marxism
00:07:25 Francis Parker Yockey and Kerry Bolton’s defense of Stalin
00:09:41 “The problem with Marxism is that it’s revolutionary”
00:11:04 On race-mixing
00:20:10 Are religious taboos against pride and vanity healthy? (see Greg Johnson’s essay “Wallflower Psychology“)
00:32:40 Should convicted criminals have to do the jobs Americans won’t do?
00:34:11 Would Marx have been woke?
00:37:00 What’s your favorite film franchise?
00:44:10 What are some of your favorite film endings?
00:51:17 On the latest drama between Nick Fuentes, Milo, and Ali Alexander
01:11:45 If a White Nationalist is going mainstream, shouldn’t we lay off the criticisms?
01:29:48 What is “identity politics”?
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
9 comments
If I were on Twitter my responses to Peterson would be:
All hail Jordan Peterson, the great defender of Western Civilization. A rabid, anti-white Pakistani stands in Scotland’s most august body and denounces it for being too white. Peterson runs to the anti-white, Pakistani subervisive’s defense. Bravo!
All hail Jordan Peterson, a leading intellectual (sic) of our time. A Pakistani Muslim renounces Scotland’s government, not as an individualist citing policy concerns or on ideological grounds, but for being too white. Peterson is as confused as an American Supreme Court Justice and scolds the white people for rightly taking offense and expressing outrage and tells them, ‘That brown, Muslim Pakistani guy is as white as an Irishman.”
All hail Jordan Peterson, a leading theologian (sic) of our time. Searching so deeply for a ritual’s meaning he can’t see that he is being mocked. A man so thoroughly broken he has 13th stepped himself yet again. Sounds like he needs to go back to the first rule.
Mr. Peterson, go clean your room. The task of defending The West and the people who comprise it, is one for men who have long since moved past learning to make their beds and stand straight.
That was soooo interesting! Yeah, the Milo-Fuentes-Kanye molecule was so unstable it had to fly apart within nanoseconds.
In Unbreakable in the train station, I think it’s the other people whose sins he sees. One of the young guys hit the guy with the bottle. But then he recognizes the “can I come in” guy has real hostages—that’s something he can do something about. I actually think shamylan is on our side, more or less, from little quips here and there.
Off topic a bit, I was watching Out of the Blue per fire walk with lee’s rec. it’s about a tomboyish girl who goes around talking to people. I got the impression that this film was a big influence on Jarmusch, particularly Permanent Vacation, in which a boy has similar experiences. Both main characters are into music and poetry, etc. Then I realized that both films are from 1980! I.e. one couldn’t have influenced the other, but rather they share some common origin. They are about one of these “guys” the Illuminati are after. He is from a low class broken family, into punk music, and probably gay, as implied by the lesbian female cgaracter, as such a high percentage of them are.
It’s similar to matrix and dark city: both movies are basically the same underlying story. We live in a fabricated reality created by malign entities, aliens or AI, or some group in our real world. A dark haired guy resists them and transcends to fight them in their own abilities. It’s one of these guys they are after, I think the same as “big brain on brad” guy from pulp fiction, actually. He wishes he could do the things they do to him back to his persecutors! Strong willed. Basically, it would seem that the stories come down from some sort of chief Kabbalist on high, and each artist expresses them in his own way. Fascinating.
A contender for ‘favourite film-ending’ is the climax of Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood. Tarantino’s wish-fulfilment fantasy in which Manson family members get their comeuppance was completely unexpected. It worked so well as we’d been inwardly bracing ourselves for Sharon Tate’s bloody demise.
This was sad to listen to. Gottfried was spot on.
“They chose to be our enemies.” (1:28:30)
That statement gives new meaning to their motto “The Chosen”.
I enjoyed this conversation, especially the section about films. I hope Greg Johnson will write a whole book reviewing Western films.
I was thinking about liberalism in the movement.
I recall someone telling me that when White people on the left begin to organize collectively, then things are going to happen. The left side of the political spectrum is filled with activists. So when those liberals finally figure it out and say to themselves, “hey we didn’t mean White genocide when we said we will include everyone,” they will fight back.
Also, the liberals I know are not keen on Jews. Or, I should say, they are aware of the JQ.
I think there’s some truth to this opinion. White Identity may go mainstream once the liberals turn that corner. They are at heart activists.
-To all Africans in European Homelands, please depart our homelands. Reason? Irreconcilable differences.
-In 1862, President Abraham Lincoln addressed several African leaders at the White House:
“You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated.”
-Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.”
On the greatest journalists, I never miss a column by Jim Goad. He is tremendous. And although I know very little about Mencken, since so many people I respect say he is tremendous, I accept that. But the best journalist as far as I can see, is Sam Francis.
Did he actually say “He has no chest” when listing the shortcomings of young men? The preoccupation with big muscles on the Right is embarrassing. And furthermore big chests are a female concern.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment