Counter-Currents
Podcast with Robert Wallace & Gregory Hood
Time for White Identity Politics
Counter-Currents Radio
51 words / 1:24:16
Counter-Currents’ own Robert Wallace was host Gregory Hood‘s guest on American Renaissance’s Left, Right, and White podcast, where they spoke about building institutions, some white pills about the state of white identity politics, and the need for “patrons” to step forward to ensure victory. Click here or use the player below.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
11 comments
Such a pity about the clarity of sound…really hard to listen to .
That would be your audio, brother. 65 comments on AmRen and not a single one about sound quality. I’m using a Rode mic. I’ve listened to it a couple of times and it’s pretty much pristine.
Fantastic conversation. It’s a waste of time for me to listen to people dumber than me. This was the opposite.
Shalom, sir! We’re looking forward to a great conversation with you next week 😉
I thought it was an interesting episode. And it’s true: The left has no ideas and little talent but a lot of money. The right has the ideas and talent but compared to the left almost no money. Maybe people on the right in general are too individualistic and want to do eveything themselves? We are selfmade and are not used to submitting to the flock or in this case an institution. But we are gonna have to learn quickly because we are easy to strike down one by one. It makes sense that we should build institutions and community instead of doing something brave but shortsighted one by one. Maybe Ashli Babbitt would still be here if she hadn’t been so brave and strongwilled? These are obviously in most cases good qualities but not if you charge into danger recklessly. And that is what a lot of good people did that day, God bless them all.
It isn’t that we “should” have institutions. We “must” have specific types of institutions.
We need a policy institute (P.S. – we’re building it) to map out our positions with Ph.D/J.D. detail. We won’t be “shit-posting.” Then we need a legislative action lobby to twist lawmakers’ arms into passing those reforms. We need the institutions every successful interest group has. And we need to popularize, and therefore channel donor support, for white identity politics into these institutions. We need to develop comparable wealth to the NRA etc. to win. Notice these are “needs,” not shoulds. The value of the podcast is that G.H. know what we need due to our hard experience in the non-profit world, which is the world that matters in American politics. We are not “commenters,” we are experts. That is not “bragging.” It is being blunt. Plain-speaking (not pussyfooting) is the culture of heavyweight organizations and it’s how to get shit done generally.
Thanks for listening, AAAA. I’m glad you got something out of it.
FYI, Robert Wallace: Medici is correctly pronounced MAY-dee-chee, not muh-DEE-chee.
Cool story, bro
FYI, Robert Wallace, I know whereof I speak. If you doubt me because I’m the unknown, random commenter, take a moment to verify my claim with a proper Italian speaker.
Here’s an observation about why Conservatism, Inc, lacks the confidence to win…
On more than one occasion I have seen recommendations made to conservatives that they get involved in street activism: protest marches, flash demonstrations, counter-marching leftist actions, perhaps even a sit-in or two. Conservatives generally reject such tactics, often quite vehemently. The usual litany of excuses starts off with “activism does not accomplish anything.” Instead, the path to conservative victory apparently includes: (a) generating a list of high-falutin’ principles; (b) running real conservatives as candidates for office; and (c) writing position papers which nobody reads.
But…one unsung advantage of street activism is that it brings the real leaders to the front. These are the people full of that passionate intensity required to push through a movement to victory. Often, such people go unnoticed in the rarefied world of Beltway cocktail parties. But when you have a hundred rightist demonstrators out on the main drag in a face to face confrontation with a leftist mob, these activists are the ones who stand their ground to carry the day. And these are the ones who have the confidence to take on the Regime, whether in the streets, the boardrooms, or the halls of the legislature.
This is probably the reason that the Regime takes such pains to suppress rightist street activism, from Charlottesville ’17 to the recent Patriot Front adventure in Idaho. The Regime wants to knock out the people who would form the cadre for a militant nationalist-populist movement.
If a movement wants to advance, it might identify those street activists and then mentor them through positions of responsibility.
Conservatives do not have heroic actions in their nature. I agree with your points in theory but we cannot engage in confrontational activism now or in the foreseeable future. For example, what NJP has done has not been confrontational. It’s still risky, but so far, their demonstrations have been prudently executed.
But fighting the most powerful police state in the world in the streets is a dumbass strategy. Leftists are the shock troops of that police state. That people are still doing this after Charlottesville is incredible. Conservative, e.g., pro-life protests are not false flagged like Charlottesville because abortion is low on the elite’s priority list. Supreme Court? Enough said. So are all of the other conservative hot-button issues. Ours will invariably be false flagged and the repression of productive institutions will be the result.
It’s true that activist lads can be good candidates for mentorship. They’re dedicated. Problem is, that we don’t have the resources to hire them, or anybody else, really. Impatient young guys want to go out in the street to fight the good fight but the need is philanthropy, and they should focus on their careers instead. If they get doxxed, Godspeed with that. Activism is easier than the daily grind of career-building. And we don’t need street fighters, we need talented, skilled pros in IT, finance, marketing, development, law, etc. How do I know this? Because every influential institution has these people because they need them to be successful.
Conservatives also don’t do activism because activism has almost nothing to do with power in American politics. The power lies in non-profit revenue, period. That most people are not aware of this shows they don’t know their ass from their eyebrow. I don’t mean to be condescending but movement soldiers need to get this through hyperthick skulls. You could say “conservatives are useless though.” But they are not useless in what they actually take seriously, e.g., “free markets.”
Believe me, if street protests were advantageous today, I’d be the first man to enlist. But we need to be more like Odysseus than Achilles in the years ahead.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.