Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 342
Greg Johnson, Millennial Woes, & Fróði Midjord

8 comments

1. Branson Cleary says:

   May 11, 2021 at 11:20 am

   Download link giving previous episode, just fyi.

   1. Niels Ebbesen says:

      May 11, 2021 at 12:08 pm

      I have the same issue.

      1. hen_ogledd says:

         May 11, 2021 at 3:23 pm

         me three.
2. Dr ExCathedra says:

   May 11, 2021 at 11:22 am

   Having trouble linking the listing of topics with the actual podcast. Something out of sync, I think.
3. Dr ExCathedra says:

   May 11, 2021 at 5:08 pm

   On half-Jews in the ethnostate. It’s a very theoretical question now, but I think there is more to it. The problem of the next generation. You find it with Third World and especially Muslim “migrants” into the White sphere, where the arrivals, experiencing what drove them out and how much better the new land is, produce children who are at home neither here nor in the old country, neither grateful nor attracted. If I am not mistaken, a great number of murderous jihadis are second generation.

   And you have the phenomenon of the descendants of conversos (forcibly or opportunistically baptized Jews who, with typical crypsis, maintain their old Semitism).  This blood link, even over generations, does provoke, if not reconversion, then a transfer of allegiance from the Gentile nation to the older DNA.

   And because Hollywood is a great place to be a Jew and that could influence the choice, how many “early life” actors, etc. with only one Jewish ancestor, even a single grandparent, will claim to be part of the Tribe?

   So even if one of the parents is very low on the ethnocentric scale, you can’t predict their offspring.
4. DarkPlato says:

   May 14, 2021 at 4:22 am

   It was a pretty good talk.  I too would like someone with whom to enjoy travel, movies and books.  It’s hard to find people with an earnest love of movies, who have a modicum of discrimination.

   I agree about Richard Dawkins. Basically Dawkins assiduously panders to the ruling elite. It’s interesting to contrast him with EO Wilson. Both probably think the same thing in their personal views in their private minds. However, the presentation in their popular books is different. Dawkins hawks an aggressive form of atheism to humiliate and abash simple Christians, whom the ruling elite want to attack.  While, personally in my mind I’m a stone atheist, I agree with Woes thatReligion and Christianity have immense value for the less intellectual castes.  This is also clearly evidenced in Richard Dawkins his hostility to Islam. His militant anti Islamist reveals kowtowing to neocon interests.  Also his sub text is full of evolutionary explanations for defenses of the “IT”, for the various cognoscenti or it worshipers here.  But he defends it on evolutionary grounds in the sense that elite could somehow be wiped out if they did not do this, rather than Kevin McDonald type explanations relating to the continuity or unity of ethnicity.  Wilson on the other hand in his books focuses on ecology, environmentalism, and sociobiology with it racial implications, which probably enrage the elite.

   Hitchens’s literary essays, while sometimes informative, are very derivative of Lionel trivers and Edmund Wilson.  He basically takes things they say and applies them to other writers. For example, in the essay on Chesterton, he looks at his oeuvre and declares that Chesterton‘s poetry is his greatest form, that he’s a true poet. There’s a Lionel trivers essay where he says the exact same thing with Robert Graves. This is probably true of Robert Graves, but not so much Chesterton, who is more of a prose writer in my mind.

   1. DarkPlato says:

      May 14, 2021 at 4:29 am

      Chesterton is a good poet, but his prose is every bit the equal of his poetry I would say rather
5. Dr ExCathedra says:

   May 14, 2021 at 7:30 pm

   On the rap issue. Blacks used to produce wonderful pop music, all of which was a version of White musical forms. HipHop and Rap have none of that. The biggest difference for me is not the form but the spirit. What past Black music had, and which was promoted and required by the beauty of the forms, was joy. Joy.  HipHop is utterly joyless.

Comments are closed.