Afghanistan & the Rape of Britain

1,244 words

A Brief History of Immigration and Sexual Assault in the UK

According to the World Population Review, Great Britain had 73,590 cases of rape in 2022, making it even then the rape capital of Europe. This is in contrast to the number of rapes in Britain in 2017 (57,133) according to the same source, and especially the 12,295 rapes in 2002 reported by the Office of National Statistics. In fact, if we just use the data from the Office of National Statistics, between 2002 and 2024, we have seen a staggering increase in rape from 12,295 to 71,227. Almost six times more women are raped than they were twenty years ago.

What caused this? The most staggering increase—of almost 20,000 rapes between 2017 and 2024—coincides with the Boriswave mass immigration period, during which migration increased from 737,000 in 2021 to over one million in 2022, and 1.3 million in 2023. Last year, immigration was down to 948,000, with EU nationals making up only 19 per cent of total immigration, in contrast to non-EU nationals making up 81 per cent (766,000). These non-EU nationals came predominantly from India, Pakistan and Nigeria.

This is important because, according to Reuters in 2020, “One woman report[ed] a rape every 15 minutes in India”. In Pakistan, the conviction rate for rapists lies under 3% due to an endemic culture of blaming rape victims. Meanwhile, according to a 2015 report by the United Nations, the rates of violence and rape against children in Nigeria were so extreme the previous year that before the age of eighteen, “Approximately 6 out of every 10 children experienced some form of violence”; “Half of all children experienced physical violence”, and “One in four girls and one in ten boys experienced sexual violence.” Reports from thirty to ninety years ago do not differ.

Inviting these populations into Britain has led to massive increases in violent and sexual crime unimaginable when Britain’s population was only indigenous. As a 97.7 per cent White city in 1961, London’s rape rate was only 503 that year. This is in contrast to London’s rape rate as a “multicultural” city in 2022, in which 41% of its population were born outside of the UK, which is 9334. The Centre for Migration Control has clarified that between 2021 and 2023, “Foreign nationals were convicted for sexual offences [at] a rate 71% higher than that of the British population, 69% for drug-related crime, 25% for theft, and at 39% for all crime types.”

The Secret Afghan Immigration Scandal

As far as the ongoing Rape of Britain (1967-present day) is concerned, the biggest news is the secret £7 billion resettlement of around 24,000 Afghan soldiers in the UK as well as their families. The resettlement began under Boris Johnson in February 2022, and was only “cancelled” under Keir Starmer’s premiership when the Defence Secretary John Healey revealed that the government had used a superinjunction to stop the issue from being reported on whatsoever. Seeing as the Afghans were entitled to bring their families with them, this could have led to 100,000-150,000 people coming into Britain if the scheme hadn’t been cancelled on Monday. Nevertheless, John Healey admitted in his statement that “to date, 36,000 Afghans have been accepted by Britain through a range of relocation schemes.” One Afghan apparently brought 14 dependents with him; the average might be 8.

Leaving aside the fact that this constitutes the ethnic cleansing of the British people under Article II section three of the UN’s definition of genocide, what does the presence of this foreign army mean for our country? The Centre for Migration Control indicates that Afghans are the group by far the most likely to be convicted of sexual assault (59 per 10,000 people) based on a 2023 freedom of information request. Here German statistics are also instructive: the magazine Junge Freiheit reports that in Germany in 2018, despite making up just “0.3 percent of the population”, Afghan men were “suspected perpetrators in six percent of gang rapes.” This is likely connected to the cultural practise of Taharrush Gamea (or Jama’i) in some Muslim cultures, which entails the ritual humiliation and mass groping of women for daring to appear in public, as was seen in Cologne in 2015, and outside the Duomo in Milan in 2025.

But there is more. In 2007, during the British and American armies’ presence in Afghanistan, the anthropologist Montgomery McFate established a service on behalf of the US military called the Human Terrain System. It was designed to “fill a large operational decision-making support gap” between the local population and Western troops. One of the main purposes of HTS, as McFate admitted to Adam Curtis in 2010, was to provide “cultural relativism” to these soldiers, especially when some of the men at the US base at Khost saw “how Afghan workers on the base disappeared into the bushes outside the base with young Afghan boys every Thursday.”

This is called Bacha bāzī (or boy play), and the HTS team on that occasion “persuaded the base commanders that this was an accepted part of Afghan sexual culture.” From those who I know that fought in Afghanistan, this practice was apparently so common amongst our anti-Taliban allies that they considered shooting some of them. Bacha bāzī is a practice so embedded in Afghan culture that despite it being illegal (whereas “Afghan law does not prohibit the use of girls for prostitution and pornographic performances”), a 2019 report by the US Department of Labor found that the then pre-Taliban government “did not prosecute any government officials for bacha bazi crimes.” Evidently, those tasked with eradicating the rape of young boys also participated in it.

What are the consequences?

Given the anti-White attitude that Muslim predators have taken towards poor English girls in the last twenty years, I expect that when bacha bāzī cases begin decimating Britain, it will be the turn of poor English boys for mass sexual exploitation. Further, seeing as we are paying each Afghan £200,000 if we use Healey’s numbers and £100,000 if we use those of the Financial Times, not to mention benefits, there could well be a situation in the coming months where a father discovers not only his daughter but his son has been raped by one of these men, whose interpreter and legal defense in court his own taxes will have already been siphoned to pay for.

We are far from the patriotic sentiment that motivated Maurice Cowling to write in the introduction to his Conservative Essays (1978), “What it should be the object of British policy to resist is any threat to the independence and integrity of the United Kingdom, and in relation to this, EEC, NATO and the Commonwealth are merely instruments with no permanent claim on loyalty or attention.” Above all, the tyranny that empowers such specimens of modern “democracy” as Mrs. Justice Yip, seems to be embedded in our commitment to the ECHR, whose role it is to extend humanity to those who deserve it least. We must tear up this bill, and in the place of a humanity that includes the dregs of the earth, establish ourselves.

The Casting of the Rebellious Angels Into Hell. William Blake, 1808

It is debatable whether there has been a darker time in our nation’s history. Certainly, the beautifully restored Nagasaki and Hiroshima are in a better situation than our demographically desecrated cities. The fact we are due to become a minority in our own homeland without some radical change is a dismal prospect, as is knowing that what will be left will not be a land of peace but a corrupt, moronic trash heap, utterly unrecognisable to those who used to belong there.

As someone who is in the process of joining the Church of England, my one comfort is knowing that those responsible for what we are going through will burn in Hell.