112 words / 1:56:25
In the latest edition of Counter-Currents Radio, Greg Johnson and David Zsutty discussed the Trump administration’s foreign policy moves. It is now available to download or listen to online.
Topics include:
2:12 – Greg’s views on American foreign policy vs MAGA Americans’ views
8:29 – What David thinks are more important things for Trump to focus on
16:25 – On Greenland
24:35 – American politics seems to run on contrarianism
39:43 – The Signal chat group leak
49:40 – Does the United States want to exit NATO?
1:00:31 – The judges and lawyers opposing Trump at home
1:19:23 – Listener questions
1:25:55 – European rearmament
1:38:20 – Summer riots on the way?
1:46:45 – On tariffs
To listen in a player, click here or below. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
8 comments
Greetings!
This was a very good show. Hard hitting stuff.
Thanks!
I thought it was great too. David is quickly becoming one of my favorite interlocutors.
Too many thoughts to state, but regarding Greenland, it’s an interesting theory that they are looking ahead to changes in Greenland that may come with global warming. Actually, Greenland was called green originally because when the Vikings got there, it was supposedly during the medieval warm period and at that time the ice sheet only covered a small portion Greenland, so it was actually green, and so may become quite habitable in the not so distant future. Even so, if there was some rational goal or if Trump merely wanted Greenland for some legacy or ego reason, wouldn’t it make more sense for him to concentrate his political capital on the purpose of Greenland rather than p*ss off everyone else with talk of annexing Panama and Canada? Of course as wignat, I think it has to do with Israel and enabling Israeli expansion. A sort of diplomatic cover.
Great podcast. If only Our men were in charge there would be muscular statesmanship as only European man can practice it. We must have faith.
It is critical that we don’t advocate for tariffs and autarky without making clear that the invaders are going home – all tens of millions of them. Already the tribe has divided and Con Inc. has “former” leftists like Joel Kotkin and David Goldberg making the case for amnesty of the “only” 8 million who came under Biden. It must be made clear that America went bankrupt paying Americans not to work or to pretend to work. That is changing and the Protestant work ethic is coming back on this continent led by those who conquered it.
Trump has it all set up interestingly enough. Mass deportations to undo the decades of foreign predation. Expulsion of aliens from our government must be a part of that. DOGE and the government efficiency project should be a part of the autarky project. He must make clear that welfare bums and people being paid to commit treason has nearly destroyed us. That is ending and anyone who is a legitimate American, that is here before the treason of the ’65 immigration act, will no longer be paid to not work nor to destroy us.
The good news is there will be many jobs available that are productive. If Bari Weiss, and Joel Kotkin, Ben Shapiro … … don’t want to do them, they can go back to the foreign domicile that we have created for them out of the goodness of our hearts. They can, like our forefathers did, defy greater powers and forge from a hostile environment a nation of their own from their own and for their own.
I digress. The main point is that autarky and tariffs must be interwoven with demographic restoration and with ending mass sinecure and welfare patronage. They go together. If not, the perfidious are already making their case for a mass amnesty in order to fix a labor shortage that can and must be filled with the abundance of able bodied Americans who must become productive again. We know that amnesty will be a disaster and finish us off. Statesmanship demands that we tie this all together and put the words on the lips of Trump.
Great episode.
As far as I’m aware America offered to buy Greenland in the 1800s but after Seward’s Folly (the Alaska purchase) the American people were against it.
Later, in the 1930s the Technocracy Movement included Greenland in their dream of a unified North America reaching as far down as northern South America https://theconversation.com/a-1930s-movement-wanted-to-merge-the-us-canada-and-greenland-heres-why-it-has-modern-resonances-252587
While I can imagine a Fortress North America that includes Greenland I can’t imagine in today’s climate the inclusion of Central and parts of South America.
Europe is not just a vassal of USA, Europe is a vassal of the Blue American Empire.
This difference was really hammered home during Trumps first term in office, and it only seems fair to assume it would continue.
Since Trump is in opposition to the previous power structure in USA, that means that he per default is in opposition to the power structure in Europe. Even before he started the 51st Canada state, Greenland affair and the tariffs the European elite was against him.
This naturally raises the questions that if he is able to secure his hold of power in USA, can the vassals of his opposition be trusted to hold power over places like Greenland that is naval and aerially strategically important?
There are many pro white arguments against Trump since he is the personification of MAGA fulfilling liberalism. But that is not the same as claiming that there is no reason for the Greenland issue, and that it just seems like a realtor buzz talked scammed him into it. That just seems like a Buzzfeed level of Trump commentary, and I honestly expects more from Counter Currents. (Although perhaps I shouldn’t, it seems like the brains of the right collectively melted after the election. After Millenniyule it has been hard to find anything that can go 10 minutes without either low tier takes or veering into “actually the mainstream media or deep state is right”).
P.S. Denmark is as far as I see it a matter of luck of circumstance.
The Danish Peoples Party was for a long time the only party opposed to immigration and considered to be “unclean”.
After a while they got influence as a supporting party, and when the Social Democrats got tired of losing elections because of them, then they adopted their immigration stances (which did indeed lead to horrible elections for the Danish Peoples Party). However by the time the Social Democrats got the control back, then the problems of mass immigration across Europe was just to obvious but I have no doubt they would have carried out the same policy as the Sweden if it hadn’t been a matter of timing.
The large parties in danish politics are subsidiaries of international political parties, so it would be foolish to assume that they wouldn’t do the same as the sister parties in other countries given the chance.
This started off as an interesting comment, then you had to spoil it by being an asshole. Grow up, learn some manners, and you might actually contribute something.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.